Fluid energy has historically been used to perform useful work ranging from milling grain to land reclamation. More recently, the potential of using moving fluids to produce electric power has begun to be exploited.
Wind or hydrokinetic (water power without dams) turbines both require a device called a generator in order to transform the mechanical power of their rotating blades into electric power.
When the speed of the blades is allowed to change with the fluid speed, more optimal operation of the turbine over a range of fluid speeds is enabled. For example, a widely used measure of how closely a wind turbine can keep up with changing wind conditions is the “tip speed,” which is a non-dimensional ratio of the linear speed of the blade at its tip to the wind speed. The “design tip speed” of the wind turbine denotes the value of the tip speed, for which the energy extraction efficiency of the blades from the wind is maximized. An ideal set of blades will have a relatively small inertia, so that its turning speed can quickly keep up with changes in wind speed and keep its tip speed as close as possible to the design tip speed.
The theoretical maximum power extraction coefficient for wind turbines was first presented by A. Betz in “Wind-Energie and Ihre Ausnützung durch Windmühlen,” van den Hoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, 1926 (in German). According to Betz, the amount of power that can be extracted by a turbine from a horizontal column of wind is proportional to the swept area of the blades, and is further limited to about 59% of the total power contained in the column of wind.
The part of a wind turbine that can yaw with respect to the tower, and which houses the generator and the blade hubs among other things, is called the nacelle. The aerodynamic action of the wind on the blades of the rotor causes lift, which in turn causes the rotor to rotate about its hub. Typical rotation speeds at the blade hub are in the 10-20 rpm range; however, such speeds are generally too low for a generator to efficiently convert the mechanical rotation into electric power, requiring a bulkier generator. Some turbines on the market today utilize direct drive generators due to the simplicity and inherent reliability of a gearless system, but the majority of turbines use speed-up gearing in order to allow the generator to perform more effectively. A further advantage of a speed-up is that the torque on the generator shaft is smaller than that on the blade hub, making it easier to brake the rotor in case of dangerously high winds. The main disadvantages of multi-stage gearing are mechanical losses, complexity, and issues with reliability. Wind loads on the rotor can be highly uneven, with sudden wind gusts causing near shock loading on gear teeth and potentially leading to broken teeth. With so many wind turbines being located in out of the way places, servicing a turbine becomes a significant complication, even ignoring the losses associated with the turbine not producing any power when it is out of commission. Therefore, achieving speed conversion without gears is highly desirable. Despite all the design improvements to date, practical power extraction coefficients for wind
turbines still fall well short of Betz' theoretical maximum of 59%, instead hovering around 40%. This means that nearly ⅓ of the extractable power escapes unused. There are many reasons for this. For one, any set of blades does not fully stop the wind that hits it, instead imparting rotation and a net radially outward motion to it. Furthermore, no matter how optimal the shape of the blade, the linear blade velocity increases from the hub to the tips, such that not every point on the blade can be at an optimal speed relative to the wind at the same time. One possibility that has been proposed to remedy this situation is to use a multi-rotor system. In principle, a second rotor that is placed leeward of the first rotor will extract some more power from the column of wind that has escaped the first rotor, thereby adding to the overall power conversion efficiency of the turbine. It has been estimated that up to 40% of the escaped energy might by captured by such means.
Due to the rotation that is imparted to the column of fluid by the first rotor, the second rotor should have differently angled blades as compared to the first rotor. In this regard, a second rotor that is counter-rotating relative to the first rotor is more advantageous than a second rotor that is co-rotating with (i.e., rotating in the same direction as) the first rotor. Nonetheless, some inventors have demonstrated that a multiplicity of rotors all rotating in the same direction can also be superior to a single rotor. The main advantage of rotors mounted on the same shaft and rotating at the same speed are simplicity and the fact that the blades cannot run into each other as they rotate. However, there also are a number of reasons that favor unequal rotation speeds. For one, similar rotors all rotating at the same speed can lead to sympathetic vibrations and cause premature fatigue failures. In addition, the fact that the fluid has already gone through one rotor will have slowed it down, such that leeward rotors will need to rotate at a slower speed in order to operate near their optimum in terms of extracting power from the fluid. Indeed, generally, having means to adapt the blade speed to the fluid speed in order to extract maximum power is considered desirable.
A further advantage of a counter-rotating arrangement over a co-rotating arrangement is that the net moment load on the support structure is lessened. Each rotor receives a torque input from the fluid stream, which is eventually passed to the support structure. If there is a counter-rotating rotor, then its torque input from the fluid stream tends to cancel out that from the first rotor, allowing a more optimized, less costly design for the structure.
Providing a system that enables the effective rotation of a least two rotors or blades on a wind turbine, hydrokinetic turbine or the like is difficult to obtain. In particular many problems arise in the effective provision of counter-rotating blades on a wind turbine, hydrokinetic turbine or the like.
Fluid energy systems use the energy contained in moving or accumulated fluid in order to do useful work. Most such systems use either air (wind) or water. In the case of water power, the water is either gathered behind a dam (conventional hydropower) or used in its natural moving state without a dam (hydrokinetic power). Hydrokinetic power generation is the use of the kinetic energy of natural currents in order to produce useful power. This is sometimes also referred to as instream power generation. In contrast to conventional hydropower, hydrokinetic power generation requires less infrastructure and can be installed cost-effectively even on small scales.
The main advantages of rotors mounted on the same shaft and rotating at the same speed are simplicity and the fact that the blades cannot run into each other as they rotate. However, there also are a number of reasons that favor unequal rotation speeds. For one, similar rotors all rotating at the same speed can lead to sympathetic vibrations and cause premature fatigue failures. In addition, the fact that the fluid has already gone through one rotor will have slowed it down, such that leeward rotors will need to rotate at a slower speed in order to operate near their optimum in terms of extracting power from the fluid. Indeed, generally, having means to adapt the blade speed to the fluid speed in order to extract maximum power is considered desirable.
The same arguments apply to wind turbines apply to hydrokinetic or non-dam water turbines. Typical installations of such turbines are near river bends or tidal channels where the water velocity is maximized. It is imperative to keep turbines from impeding (or being damaged by) watercraft. However, servicing concerns favor turbines being mounted in close proximity to existing infrastructure. The combination of these aims limits potential sites for hydrokinetic power, making it that much more desirable to extract more power from a turbine by using counter-rotating rotors. It is also true that counter-rotation reduces turbulence downstream from the turbine and adds to its dynamic stability.
Due to the rotation that is imparted to the column of fluid by the first rotor, the second rotor should have differently angled blades as compared to the first rotor. In this regard, a second rotor that is counter-rotating relative to the first rotor is more advantageous than a second rotor that is co-rotating with (i. e. , rotating in the same direction as) the first rotor. Nonetheless, some inventors have demonstrated that a multiplicity of rotors all rotating in the same direction can also be superior to a single rotor. The main advantages of rotors mounted on the same shaft and rotating at the same speed are simplicity and the fact that the blades cannot run into each other as they rotate. However, there also are a number of reasons that favor unequal rotation speeds. For one, similar rotors all rotating at the same speed can lead to sympathetic vibrations and cause premature fatigue failures. In addition, the fact that the fluid has already gone through one rotor will have slowed it down, such that leeward rotors will need to rotate at a slower speed in order to operate near their optimum in terms of extracting power from the fluid. Indeed, generally, having means to adapt the blade speed to the fluid speed in order to extract maximum power is considered desirable.
A further advantage of a counter-rotating arrangement over a co-rotating arrangement is that the net moment load on the support structure is lessened. Each rotor receives a torque input from the fluid stream, which is eventually passed to the support structure. If there is a counter-rotating rotor, then its torque input from the fluid stream tends to cancel out that from the first rotor, allowing a more optimized, less costly design for the structure. Providing a system that enables the effective rotation of a least two rotors or blades on a wind turbine, hydrokinetic turbine or the like is difficult to obtain without the system of syndrives as used in the present invention.
These and other needs are well met by the presently disclosed, compact and highly efficient multi-rotor fluid turbine drive with speed converter. The invention is directed towards the provision of a coaxial arrangement of multiple rotors driving one or more input shafts of the turbine.
More specifically, but not limited to, the present invention provides a multi-rotor fluid turbine, in which all rotors are positioned co-axially for minimum frontal area; allows all rotors to drive the same generator; allows each additional rotor to rotate at an optimal speed, independent of the speed of other rotors; allows both counter-rotating and co-rotating rotors to drive the same shaft; and provides a multi-rotor fluid turbine that minimizes reaction torques on the supporting structure of the turbine.
In one embodiment of the invention, a windward rotor or blade directly drives an input shaft, while a counter-rotating leeward rotor or blade drives the same input shaft through a speed converter. The speed ratio of this converter can be designed, so as to provide a desired relative rate of rotation between the two rotors, including but not limited to equal and opposite rotation speeds. In another embodiment, the speed converter has a primary cam for providing a rotary input in a first direction, and a secondary cam to interact therewith via rolling elements captured within slots of an intermediate carrier. For ease of presentation, these cams, cam tracks or discrete cams are generally referred to as cams. Either the primary or secondary cam has a plurality of cycles, which at times may appear to be tooth-like and may be referred to as cycles, lobes or teeth without distinction.
In another embodiment, a windward rotor directly drives a shaft, whereas a leeward rotor rotating in the same direction as the windward rotor indirectly drives the same shaft through a speed converter. The difference between this speed converter and that used in the embodiment with the counter-rotating leeward rotor is that this speed converter is direction-preserving, whereas the other speed converter is direction-reversing. Both types of converters use cams and rolling elements captured within slots of an intermediate carrier. The difference in output direction may be due to which element is assigned which function (input, output or ground), or to how many slots and corresponding rolling elements are interposed between the cams. In some embodiments of the invention, a clutch-brake is positioned between the counter-rotating rotors and allows slowing down the blades by braking them against each other. In other cases, a similar clutch-brake is used between ground and a component of the speed converter, so as to allow ground to “slip” and temporarily change the output speed of the speed converter.
Various embodiments of the invention include further speed converters between the rotors and the generator of the fluid turbine, in order to influence the relative speed of rotation of the two rotors, and/or the speed of the generator shaft itself. In one of these embodiments, the rotor and stator of the generator are driven separately and in opposite directions, resulting in an increase of the relative speed between them as compared to driving the rotor alone.
The below description of the design and operation of the speed converters can be applied to various embodiments and should be understood to do so, even though one or the other embodiment is shown or described for ease of presentation. In other words, the following description is provided by way of illustration and not limitation.
In one radial embodiment, the primary and secondary cams are each formed on the lateral face of a primary or secondary disk. Each of the primary and secondary cams has various flank portions. A respective rolling element (ball or roller) in a respective radial intermediate carrier slot is oscillated between a minimum and maximum radius by the primary cam. In one embodiment, the carrier is grounded and the secondary cam is the output element. In other embodiments, the carrier may be an input or output member, while one of the cams is grounded. In yet other embodiments, two elements may be the input and one element the output.
In various embodiments, the slot locations and the slot angles on the intermediate carrier are selected in recognition of the fact that for a rotating primary cam, e. g., clockwise, the carrier must locate the rolling elements such that the rise side of the primary cam interacts with the clockwise side of the cycles of the secondary cam (for clockwise driven rotation) or with the counterclockwise side of the cycles of the secondary cam (for counterclockwise driven rotation). Thus the configuration of the intermediate carrier is changed according to whether a reversing or non-reversing output is desired.
In one embodiment, the primary cam has a driving flank with a contour that varies substantially linearly with angular rotation at a first rate of variation. The secondary cam has a driven flank with a contour that varies substantially linearly with angular rotation at a second rate of variation. These cams are designed according to the cams described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,312,306, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and assigned to the present assignee of this invention. Another patent of interest is U.S. Pat. No. 6,186,922, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and assigned to the present assignee of this invention. Other waveforms, including those based on linear spiral segments and on sinusoidal curves, and others, can be used in practice of the present invention.
A device for changing fluid flow through a pair of blades from a first type of energy to a second type of energy:
a first blade connected to a single shaft to receive the fluid flow and rotate the first blade in a first direction; a second blade connected to the single shaft to receive the fluid and rotate the second blade in a second direction; and the second blade connected to the single shaft by an inner cam that is mounted to the single shaft, an outer cam, a reaction carrier that is grounded and at least one rolling element; the single shaft connected to a generator for transferring the fluid flow into electrical energy; wherein the single shaft rotates in a single direction. Or,
first blade connected to a single shaft to receive the fluid flow and rotate the first blade in a first direction; a second blade connected to the single shaft to receive the fluid and rotate the second blade in the first direction; and the second blade connected to the single shaft by an inner cam that is mounted to the single shaft, an outer cam that is grounded, a reaction carrier and at least one rolling element; the single shaft connected to a generator for transferring the fluid flow into electrical energy; wherein the single shaft rotates in a single direction. Or,
a first blade connected to a first shaft to receive the fluid flow and rotate the first blade in a first direction; the first shaft connected to a second shaft by a first inner cam that is mounted to the second shaft, a first outer cam, a first reaction carrier that is mounted to the first shaft and at least one rolling element; a second blade connected to the second shaft and to receive the fluid and rotate the second blade in a second direction; and the second blade connected to the second shaft by an inner cam that is mounted to the second shaft, an outer cam, a reaction carrier that is grounded and at least one rolling element; the second shaft connected to a generator for transferring the fluid flow into electrical energy; wherein the second shaft rotates in the same direction as the first direction. Or,
a first blade connected to a first shaft to receive the fluid flow and rotate the first blade in a first direction; the first shaft connected to a second shaft by a first inner cam that is mounted to the second shaft, a first outer cam that is mounted to the first shaft, a first reaction carrier and at least one rolling element; a second blade connected to the second shaft and to receive the fluid and rotate the second blade in the first direction; the second blade connected to the second shaft by an inner cam that is mounted to the second shaft, an outer cam that is connected to the second blade, a reaction carrier that is grounded and at least one rolling element; the second shaft connected to a generator for transferring the fluid flow into electrical energy; and wherein the second shaft rotates in the opposite direction of the first direction. Or,
first blade connected to a first shaft to receive the fluid flow and rotate the first blade in a first direction; a second shaft having an inner cam that is mounted to the second shaft, an outer cam grounded, a reaction carrier that is attached to the first shaft and at least one roller element; the second shaft having a reaction carrier, a third shaft having an inner cam that is mounted to the third shaft, the outer cam grounded, a reaction carrier that is attached to the second shaft and at least one roller element; the third shaft connected to a generator for transferring the fluid flow into electrical energy; and wherein the second shaft and the third shaft rotates in the same direction as the first direction. Or,
a first blade connected to a first shaft to receive the fluid flow and rotate the first blade in a first direction; a second blade connected to a first shaft to receive the fluid flow and rotate the second in a first direction; an intermediate element having an inner cam, a reaction carrier that is attached to the first shaft and at least one roller element, a second shaft having an inner cam that is mounted to the second shaft, an outer cam formed on the intermediate element, a reaction carrier that is grounded and at least one roller element; the second shaft is connected to a generator for transferring the fluid flow into electrical energy; and wherein the second shaft rotates in the opposite direction of the first direction. Or,
a first blade connected to a first shaft to receive the fluid flow and rotate the first blade in a first direction; the first shaft connected to a second shaft by a first inner cam that is mounted to the second shaft, a first outer cam grounded, a first reaction carrier that is mounted to the first shaft and at least one rolling element, the second shaft connected to the rotor of a generator; a second blade connected to a stator of the generator and to receive the fluid and rotate the second blade in a second direction; and the second blade connected to the stator by an inner cam that is mounted to the stator, an outer cam, a reaction carrier that is grounded and at least one rolling element; wherein the second shaft rotates opposite the stator. Or,
a first blade connected to a first shaft to receive the fluid flow and rotate the first blade in a first direction; the first shaft connected to a second shaft by a first inner cam that is mounted to the second shaft, a first outer cam, a first reaction carrier that is mounted to the first shaft and at least one rolling element; a second blade connected to the second shaft and to receive the fluid and rotate the second blade in a second direction; and the second blade connected to the second shaft by an outer cam that is mounted to the second shaft; the second shaft connected to a generator for transferring the fluid flow into electrical energy; wherein the second shaft rotates in the same direction as the first direction.
In its various embodiments, the present invention is directed to a provision of a coaxial arrangement of multiple rotors driving one or more input shafts of a fluid turbine. In some other embodiments of the invention, planetary or bevel gear configurations are taught that also offer this in-line transmission configuration.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully understood by reference to the following detailed description in conjunction with the attached drawing in which like reference numerals refer to like elements and in which:
The numerous design features of the various embodiments of this invention provide, but are not limited to, various advantages over past designs, such as, for example: minimum frontal area,
ability of all rotors to simultaneously drive the same generator, ability to choose (and, in some embodiments, actively regulate) the speed of each rotor for optimum power extraction from the fluid,
allowing both counter- and co-rotating rotors to drive the same shaft, and minimize reaction torques on the supporting structure.
For purposes of clarity in understanding the various embodiments of the invention, all components of a wind mill, wind turbine or hydrokinetic turbine? that may be conventional have been omitted, with only those components related directly to the embodiments of this invention being shown and described. For further ease of understanding of the embodiments, many like or substantially like elements may be designated with identical reference numerals. However, in certain instances these substantially like elements may be given different reference numerals to better understand the various embodiments. Also, the terms rotors and blades may be used interchangeably without affecting the basic concept of this invention. The embodiments may be depicted in the context of a wind turbine in the description by way of example and not limitation. A person skilled in the art will appreciate that the same substantial design can be applied to a hydrokinetic or other fluid turbine.
In its various embodiments the present invention provides, but is not limited to, a multi-rotor fluid turbine drive system that utilizes uniquely configured cams and rollers, and that is capable of providing a compact, in-line arrangement wherein the multiple rotors can drive one or more concentric shafts.
Depicted in
Still a further alternative embodiment of the invention in which windward rotor 10 and leeward rotor 11 counter-rotate in response to the wind is shown in
Depicted in
Shown in
Similarly,
Shown in
Likewise, shown in
Although the invention has been described with respect to various embodiments, it should be realized this invention is also capable of a wide variety of further and other embodiments within the spirit and scope of the claimed invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US10/36552 | 5/28/2010 | WO | 00 | 12/1/2011 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61182819 | Jun 2009 | US |