Multi-ROV delivery system and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6260504
  • Patent Number
    6,260,504
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 21, 2000
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 17, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A TMS, cage type or top hat type incorporates a deployment frame. The TMS may be operated by a winch from a surface vessel. The TMS delivers a main ROV and a smaller mini ROV. The main ROV is fully functional to accomplish the necessary task subsea. However, in the event there is an operational failure of the main ROV, the mini ROV can be deployed. The mini ROV may have fewer functionalities than the main ROV, but can at least offer video and lighting to allow monitoring of a particular location subsea. All the necessary positioning capabilities are available on the mini ROV.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The field of this invention relates to equipment and methods for deploying remotely-operated vehicles (ROV) subsea.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Typically, when exploration or servicing must occur in deep water, ROVs are used for access to a site and for completion of a variety of different tasks. ROVs are generally self-propelled for proper positioning, and include manipulation linkages to allow such activities as turning valves to be accomplished by the ROV. The ROV typically also has video equipment and lighting to allow personnel at the surface to better direct its movements for proper positioning to accomplish a specific job. ROVs are frequently deployed using structures known as tether management systems (TMS). A deployed tether management system can be either a cage type with the ROV stored inside it or a top hat type with the ROV stored below it. The TMS with ROV is lowered from a vessel at the surface with a winch system. When the TMS reaches close to the seabed, the ROV is actuated to disengage from the TMS, and is thereafter directed to the work site location. The ROV is tethered to the TMS to facilitate its operation by the transmission of power and signals to the ROV from the surface through the TMS.




One of the problems in deploying ROVs is the space required on the surface vessel to house the TMS and ROV. Typically, a surface vessel will include a single ROV with a TMS to accomplish a particular task. If mechanical or other difficulties ensue with regard to the ROV, there can be significant delays before a replacement unit can be brought to the surface vessel. A replacement unit would also require additional deck space.




As previously stated, ROVs accomplish a variety of different functions. In many applications, the purpose of the ROV is really to illuminate and transmit video to the surface for monitoring of particular subsea equipment or condition. It is therefore one of the objects of the present invention to allow the ability to perform certain tasks which require an ROV, even if the main ROV on the surface vessel experiences operational difficulties. This objective of the present invention is resolved by configuring a TMS to not only accept a main ROV, but also a smaller mini ROV, preferably housed directly below the cage type TMS or housed within the top hat type TMS. Accordingly, if problems ensue with the main ROV, certain functions can continue to be accomplished with the mini ROV until a replacement ROV is delivered to the surface vessel. The configuration into a compact package is another objective of the present invention. Depending on the space availability of the particular application, the mini ROV can have some or most, if not all, the capabilities of the original ROV. Practically, in most applications, the mini ROV will have substantially fewer capabilities than the principal or main ROV.




Illustrative of use of ROVs in the prior art are U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,010,619, 4,686,927, 4,721,055 and 5,069,580. These and other benefits of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment below.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A TMS, cage type or top hat type incorporates a deployment frame and is operated by a winch from a surface vessel which delivers a main ROV and a smaller mini ROV. The main ROV is fully functional to accomplish the necessary task subsea. However, in the event there is an operational failure of the main ROV, the mini ROV can be deployed. The mini ROV may have fewer functionalities than the main ROV, but can at least offer video and lighting to allow monitoring of a particular location subsea. All the necessary positioning capabilities are available on the mini ROV.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is an elevational view of the TMS, in this instance the cage type, showing the main and mini ROVs in a stacked relationship inside a deployment frame;





FIG. 2

is a perspective view of the lower portion of the deployment frame shown in

FIG. 1

adjacent the ROV;





FIG. 3

is perspective view of the mini ROV;





FIG. 4

is a top view of the mini ROV; and





FIG. 5

is an end view of the mini ROV.





FIG. 6

is an elevational view of the top hat type TMS showing the relationship of the main and mini ROV's with respect to a deployment frame.





FIG. 7

is an elevational view of an additional embodiment of the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




This invention is designed to operate with a “deployment frame” which is a support structure. It can internally support a main ROV


16


and a mini ROV


26


in which case it is also known as a cage. It can also be a part of a tether management system (TMS) which in a top hat format supports the main ROV


16


from within or underneath while the mini ROV


26


is supported from within.




Referring to

FIG. 1

, the cage type TMS comprises a deployment frame


10


is initially supported on a surface vessel (not shown) and is connected to a boom on such vessel so that it can be swung overboard. A cable attached to a bullet


12


at the top of deployment frame


10


allows for raising and lowering of the deployment frame


10


. The main ROV


16


is a design well known in the art. It typically has a plurality of thrusters


18


as well as manipulators


20


. The position of the TMS can also be controlled with thrusters


22


if the TMS is powered; some TMS types have no thrusters attached. The deployment frame


10


has an open end adjacent the manipulators


20


to allow the main ROV


16


to emerge from the deployment frame


10


. Deployment frame


10


also includes a transformer


24


, integrated into the ROV


16


. Mounted below in deployment frame


10


is the mini ROV


26


which is better shown in

FIG. 2. A

winch


28


is mounted in the deployment frame


10


that allows the mini ROV


26


to be retrieved by its tether. The winch


28


is a tether management system that pays out or takes up the tether to facilitate ROV movements. The cable extends over a pulley


30


which is partially hidden in FIG.


2


and disposed between the winch


28


and the electronics bottle


32


. Also located on the deployment frame


10


adjacent the mini ROV


26


is a bladder


34


and a transformer


36


. Adjacent the transformer


36


is a valve pack


38


. A subframe


40


stabilizes the mini ROV


26


in deployment frame


10


. The mini ROV


26


itself has a frame


42


and a plurality of thrusters


44


so that it can be properly positioned. The thrusters are illustrated in FIG.


5


. The front of the mini ROV


26


is shown in FIG.


3


. It has lights


46


and a camera


48


shown in FIG.


4


.

FIG. 5

illustrates the electronic bottles


50


which house, among other things, telemetry equipment. Adjacent the lights


46


is a pan/tilt control device


52


.




Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the configuration of the mini ROV


26


can be changed without departing from the spirit of the invention. Although shown below the main ROV


16


to accommodate a retrofit to an existing cage, the mini ROV


26


can be placed above the much heavier main ROV


16


to add greater stability to the cage. For example, depending on the configuration of the main ROV


16


and the size of the deployment frame


10


, additional or other features can be incorporated in the mini ROV


26


without departing from the spirit of the invention. A plurality of mini ROVs can also be deployed. Accordingly, the mini ROV


26


could potentially have manipulators for inserting or removing stabs or operating valves. In the particular instance of the preferred embodiment described in

FIGS. 1-5

, the capabilities of the mini ROV are more limited to allowing observation using the lights


46


and the camera


48


. However, certain operations subsea only require monitoring. Accordingly such monitoring activities can continue while a replacement ROV is delivered to the surface vessel, or during the time that repairs are made to the ROV on the surface vessel or at a remote location. Additionally, the mini ROV


26


can be used in rescue operations of the main ROV


16


, or they can complete certain tasks together. For example, while landing a “Christmas tree” or a blow-out preventer, the main ROV


16


and the mini-ROV


20


can operate together. If the tether on the main ROV


16


is tangled, the mini ROV


26


can grapple it and untangle it. The mini ROV


26


can also apply a hook to the main ROV


16


to aid in rescue efforts from the vessel at the surface. The mini ROV


26


can also take corrosion readings on pipes or vessels.




Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that significant down-time can be eliminated without the sacrifice of valuable deck space on the surface vessel. A deployment frame


10


having the same footprint can now accommodate a reserve backup unit or multiple units which can allow certain operations to continue while the main ROV


16


is replaced or repaired.




An alternative embodiment is shown in FIG.


6


. This is the top hat arrangement which includes a tether management system


60


supported in a deployment frame


62


. The main ROV


64


is suspended from the lower end


66


of the deployment frame


62


. The mini ROV


68


is disposed within the deployment frame


62


and has its own tether management system


70


. The deployment frame


62


is supported from the surface vessel by a support cable


72


. Optionally, thrusters can be employed with the deployment frame


62


for positioning subsea. Those skilled in the art will appreciate the distinction using a deployment frame


10


and a deployment frame


62


. In the first instance, both the main ROV


16


and the mini ROV


26


are mounted within the deployment frame


10


. Whereas in the top hat design, employing a deployment frame


62


as shown in

FIG. 6

, the main ROV


64


is suspended below the deployment frame


62


while the mini ROV


68


is housed within the deployment frame


62


.





FIG. 7

shows a further alternative embodiment in which the tether management system


60


′ is supported in a deployment frame


62


′. The main ROV


64


′ is suspended from the lower end


66


′ of the deployment frame


62


′. The mini ROV


68


′ is also disposed underneath the deployment frame


62


′ and has its own tether management system


70


′. The deployment frame


62


′ is supported from the surface vessel by a support cable


72


′. Optionally, thrusters can be employed with the deployment frame


62


′ for positioning subsea. The main ROV


64


′ and the mini ROV


68


′ are housed side by side, under the deployment frame


62


′.




The above description is descriptive but not limiting of the claimed invention. It is merely illustrative thereof. The scope of the invention is to be determined from the attached claims, which appear below, and any and all variants within the range of equivalents of the claims.



Claims
  • 1. A system for deployment of ROV comprising:a single integral deployment frame; a main ROV separate from and supported by said single integral deployment frame; and at least one backup ROV separate from and supported by said single integral deployment frame, wherein the main and backup ROVs are supported by the single integral deployment frame independently of each other.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein:said ROVs are positioned side by side.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein:said ROVs are stacked vertically one above the other, each ROV positioned within or depending from the single integral deployment frame.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein:said main ROV is supported from an underside of said deployment frame.
  • 5. The system of claim 3, wherein:said main and backup ROV's are supported within said deployment frame.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein:said backup ROV comprises lighting and a camera.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein:said backup ROV is operable independently of said main ROV.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein:said backup ROV has some of the capabilities of said main ROV.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein:said backup ROV has all the capabilities of said main ROV.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, further comprising:at least two winches for returning each of said ROVs to said single integral deployment frame, each of the two winches being positioned within the single integral deployment frame.
  • 11. The system of claim 10 further comprising:at least one thruster on said deployment frame independent of said ROVs.
  • 12. The system of claim 10, wherein:said deployment frame is unpowered.
  • 13. The system of claim 10, wherein said winches are positioned one above the other, within the single integral deployment frame.
  • 14. The system of claim 1, wherein:said backup ROV further comprises lighting and a video camera.
  • 15. The system of claim 1, wherein said single integral deployment frame is separate and distinct from a ship from which the deployment frame is deployed.
US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
4010619 Hightower et al. Mar 1977
4686927 Hawkes et al. Aug 1987
4721055 Pado Jan 1988
4740110 Saffrhan Apr 1988
5069580 Herwig et al. Dec 1991