Multi-segment gain control system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7496338
  • Patent Number
    7,496,338
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 29, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 24, 2009
    16 years ago
Abstract
Multi-segment gain control system. Apparatus is provided for a multi-segment gain control. The apparatus includes logic to convert a gain control signal to an exponential signal, and logic to map the exponential signal to multiple control signals that are used to control multiple gain stages to produce linear multi-segment gain control.
Description
FIELD

The present invention relates generally to gain control circuits, and more particularly to a system for providing multi-segment gain control.


BACKGROUND

Variable gain amplifiers find widespread use in wireless transceivers. They are used in receivers to compensate for varying input levels and in transmitters to adjust the output power level.


A typical receiver includes a switched-gain low noise amplifier (LNA) and multiple baseband variable gain amplifiers. The switched-gain LNA provides at least two modes—high gain and bypass. It invariably suffers from switching transients that adversely affect the magnitude and phase of the received signal, which can be avoided with an LNA offering continuous gain control.


The receiver is generally characterized by its sensitivity and selectivity. The sensitivity of the radio receiver measures the minimum signal that can be detected and demodulated. This takes into account the noise figure of the radio receiver FT, the bandwidth B of the system, and the performance of the demodulator.


The noise figure of a cascaded radio receiver depends on the gain and noise contributed by each circuit, with the first few stages dominating. The selectivity, or linearity, of the radio receiver indicates the largest interfering signal that can be rejected by the system. These signals create intermodulation distortion products that increase rapidly as the interfering signal level increases and degrade receiver signal quality. As a result, the later stages in the receiver system dictate overall linearity.


The sensitivity and selectivity of the radio receiver create conflicting requirements. It therefore becomes advantageous to adapt the receiver to the operating environment and this requires individual control of the LNA and all the variable gain amplifiers.


A transmitter similarly uses baseband and radio frequency (rf) variable gain amplifiers to set the output power level, which varies dramatically in some systems such as in code division multiple access (CDMA) systems.


The transmitter is generally characterized by its maximum output power, distortion, and efficiency. The maximum output power relates to the range of the radio transmitter. It's limited by distortion, which causes spectral regrowth and interferes with nearby radio channels. In turn, amplifier distortion depends on the input signal amplitude and the operating bias, which ties directly to the efficiency of the system.


The gain of the different variable gain amplifiers directly affects the performance of the transmitter. As such, it becomes advantageous to adjust the transmitter based on its output power level and this requires control of each variable gain amplifier.


An automatic gain control (AGC) network must provide monotonic gain control with some precision; otherwise, problems develop due to feedback. Ideally, the AGC network also displays a linear-dB control response. The resulting linear control signal varies exponentially and greatly magnifies errors plus discontinuities due to segmenting of the gain control response. It would therefore be advantageous to have an AGC network that operates to overcome the above problems.


SUMMARY

In one or more embodiments, a multi-segment gain control system is provided that comprises an AGC system that optimally maps a single control signal to multiple variable gain amplifiers to allow the gain of each amplifier to be adjusted independently resulting in a smooth overall gain response, and thereby achieving greater flexibility and superior performance.


In one embodiment, apparatus is provided for a multi-segment gain control. The apparatus comprises logic to convert a gain control signal to an exponential signal, and logic to map the exponential signal to two or more control signals that are used to control two or more gain stages to produce linear multi-segment gain control.


In one embodiment, apparatus is provided for a multi-segment gain control. The apparatus comprises means for converting a gain control signal to an exponential signal, and means for mapping the exponential signal to two or more control signals that are used to control two or more gain stages to produce linear multi-segment gain control.


In one embodiment, a communication device is provided that comprises apparatus for providing a multi-segment gain control. The apparatus comprises logic to convert a gain control signal to an exponential signal, and logic to map the exponential signal to two or more control signals that are used to control two or more gain stages to produce linear multi-segment gain control.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing aspects and the attendant advantages of the embodiments described herein will become more readily apparent by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:



FIG. 1 shows a diagram of a wireless receiver that comprises one embodiment of a multi-segment gain control system;



FIG. 2 shows a diagram of one embodiment of an exponential current generator;



FIG. 3 shows a graph that illustrates the relationship between exponential current and receiver gain;



FIG. 4 shows a diagram a receiver that comprises one embodiment of an AGC system;



FIG. 5 shows a graph that illustrates how, in one embodiment, an exponential current is limited to a maximum value;



FIG. 6 shows a graph that illustrates how, in one embodiment, an exponential current is limited to a minimum value;



FIG. 7 shows a diagram of one embodiment of an AGC mapping circuit that limits the maximum output level;



FIG. 8 shows a diagram of one embodiment of an AGC mapping circuit that limits the minimum output level;



FIG. 9 shows a diagram of one embodiment of a cube circuit suitable for use in one or more embodiments of the AGC system;



FIG. 10 shows graphs that illustrate the response of one embodiment of the multi-segment gain control system;



FIG. 11 shows a diagram of one embodiment of an improved square circuit that is suitable for use in one or more embodiments of the AGC system;



FIG. 12 shows a diagram of one embodiment of an improved square-root circuit that is suitable for use in one or more embodiments of the AGC system; and



FIG. 13 shows a communication network that includes various communication devices that comprise one or more embodiments of a multi-segment gain control system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In one or more embodiments, a multi-segment gain control system is provided that comprises an AGC system that optimally maps a single control signal to multiple variable gain amplifiers to allow the gain of each amplifier to be adjusted independently resulting in a smooth overall gain response.



FIG. 1 shows a diagram of a wireless receiver that comprises one embodiment of a multi-segment gain control system. The gain control system comprises an AGC circuit that controls the gain of multiple variable-gain amplifiers (rf and baseband “bb”) independently (via control signals 102) and thereby maximizes the receiver's performance. The AGC uses a “received signal strength indicator” (RSSI) signal that represents the power of the received signal in dB to adjust the system gain. Since most variable gain amplifiers require linear control, the RSSI signal must be converted from dB to linear format to form a basis for the control signals 102.



FIG. 2 shows one embodiment of an exponential generator that operates to convert the RSSI signal from dB to linear format. The exponential generator may be included as part of the AGC circuit shown in FIG. 1. The exponential generator receives a signal IRX that represents the RSSI signal and operates to generate the current Iexp. Current I1 develops a base-emitter voltage across transistor Q1 that mirrors to transistor Q2 through resistor R1. The resulting loop equation is;

Vbe1=IRxR1+Vbe2

where IRx represents the RSSI signal (and is inversely related to the required gain). This equation can be rewritten as;







I
exp

=


I
1



exp


(

-



I
Rx



R
1



V
T



)








where VT is the thermal voltage. During operation, the transistor loop (comprising devices Q3, Q4 and P1, P2) biases transistor Q1, while transistor N1 provides the base current for transistor Q2. Resistor R2 provides a current source for transistor N1.



FIG. 3 shows a graph that illustrates the above exponential current Iexp as it varies with receiver gain.



FIG. 4 shows a diagram of a receiver that comprises one embodiment of an AGC system. The AGC system comprises the exponential current generator (exp), the rf mapping circuit 406, and the baseband mapping circuits shown generally at 408. The AGC system receives the exponential current Iexp, which forms a basis that maps (via the mapping circuits 406, 408) to form multiple control signals that are input to associated variable gain amplifiers. Since the exponential current Iexp simultaneously controls multiple amplifiers, its required control range shrinks.


For the following description, it will be assumed that the receiver comprises an rf variable gain amplifier 402 and three baseband (bb) variable gain amplifiers, shown generally at 404. During operation, the three baseband variable gain amplifiers are adjusted in tandem, and as a result, the control range is reduced to;







Δ






G
exp


=


G
range

3






where ΔGexp is the range of the exponential current defined as;







Δ






G
exp


=

20






log


(


I
sw


I
min


)








and Grange is the overall gain control range of the system. (The currents Imin and Isw correspond to the exponential currents needed to control the baseband variable gain amplifiers.) This approach advantageously raises the minimum current Imin above the noise floor, while lowering the maximum current Isw and reducing power consumption. As a result, the exponential current Iexp can be mapped to directly control the gain of the baseband amplifiers 404 using the control signals Ibb, where Ibb=Iexp from Imin to Isw.



FIG. 5 shows a graph 500 that illustrates the result of a maximum limit applied to the exponential current Iexp to form the control signal Ibb. As illustrated in the graph 500, the current increases from a minimum Imin to a maximum limit shown at Isw, which occurs at a gain of approximately 75 dB above the minimum gain of the receiver.


Above the current Isw (i.e., above 75 dB of receiver gain), the rf variable gain amplifier 402 takes over. It is preferable that the gain of the rf variable gain amplifier 402 change at the same rate as the tandem of three baseband variable gain amplifiers 404, meaning its gain control signal (Irf shown in FIG. 4) should obey a cube function as expressed by;

Irf=k(Iexp)3

where Iexp ranges from Isw to Imax, and where k is a scaling constant.



FIG. 6 shows a graph 600 that illustrates the result of a minimum limit applied to the exponential current to form the control signal Irf. As illustrated in the graph 600, the current increases from a minimum value Isw to a maximum limit Imax, starting from a point that corresponds to the same gain as where the current Isw is reached in FIG. 5.



FIG. 7 shows a diagram of one embodiment of a mapping circuit 700 that limits an exponential current to a maximum level. For example, the mapping circuit 700 is suitable for use as the mapping circuits 408 shown in FIG. 4. The mapping circuit 700 operates to limit the exponential current Iexp to a maximum value equal to the current Isw as shown in the graph 500. A current mirror establishes the exponential current Iexp in devices N2 and N3. A similar current mirror (transistors P1-P2) sets the current Isw. The diode D1 provides a path for the excess current when current Isw is larger than current Iexp and sets the voltage at the non-inverting input to the operational amplifier 702 (plus the voltage at the drain of transistor N3). When the current Iexp exceeds the current Isw, transistor N2 is pushed into triode region to limit its current to Isw. The operational amplifier 702 forces the voltage at the drain of transistor N3 to follow the voltage at the drain of transistor N2 so that transistor N3 also limits to the current Isw. Degeneration resistors (R1 thru R3) are added to the NMOS current mirrors (devices N1 thru N3) to increase the sensitivity of the network as the drain-source voltage decreases (in triode region). As a result, the output current Ibb equals the exponential current Iexp to a maximum level of Isw, where it flattens out.



FIG. 8 shows a diagram of one embodiment of a mapping circuit 800 that prevents an output current (Irfl), (which is based on the exponential current Iexp) from falling below the current Isw. A set of three current mirrors establishes current Iexp in transistor N2 and current Isw in transistors N4 and P2. The diode D1 remains biased off until the current Iexp exceeds the current Isw, at which point, the excess current Iexp-Isw flows through the diode D1 from the output. As a result, the output current Irf1 follows the current Iexp at high levels but flattens out (to the level of Isw) at low levels of current Iexp.



FIG. 9 shows a diagram of one embodiment of a cube circuit 900 that scales the current Irf1 by the power three to produce a control current Irf, as required by one or more embodiments of the AGC system. For example, in one embodiment the mapping circuit 800 and the cube circuit 900 are suitable for use at the mapping circuit 406 in FIG. 4. In one embodiment, the cube circuit comprises an analog squarer and multiplier based on translinear principles. The current Irf1 is mirrored by transistor P1 to transistor P2 and diodes D1-D2, setting the bias of transistors Q1-Q2 such that;

ID1ID2=IQ1IQ2


The constant current Ik1 flowing through transistor Q1 results in;







I

Q





2


=


I

rf





1

2


I

k





1








which is the square of the input current Irf1. The input current Irf1 is also mirrored to transistors P3 and P4. This forces the input current Irf1 through diode D3 and transistor N1. The current flowing through diode D4 is then Ik2-Irf1, with the current Ik2 constant and greater than the maximum value of Irf1.


The current IQ2 flows through transistors Q3 and Q4 with;

IQ2=IQ3+IQ4

These currents also satisfy the relationship;








I

Q





3



I

Q





4



=


I

D





3



I

D





4








which allows current IQ4 to be rewritten as;







I

Q





4


=



I

Q





3




(



I

k





2


-

I

rf





1




I

rf





1



)


=


I

Q





3




(



I

k





2



I

rf





1



-
1

)







Substituting into the expression for IQ2 yields;







I

Q





2


=



I

rf





1

2


I

k





1



=


I

Q





3




(


I

k





2



I

rf





1



)








which simplifies to the desired cube function to produce the control current IQ3 (Irf);







I

Q





3


=


I

rf





1

3



I

k





1




I

k





2









A fixed current Ik2 flows through diode D5 to set a constant operating point for transistors Q3-Q4.



FIG. 10 shows graphs 1002 and 1004 that illustrate a smooth multi-segment gain control response that results from piecing together the operation of the different mapping circuits provided in one or more embodiments of an AGC system. Referring to graph 1002, the current Imax is set to 100 μA by design, which means the current Imin is 2.6 μA and the current Isw is 46.4 μA. The resulting control currents Ibb and Irf are shown. Referring to graph 1004, the resulting gain response of the AGC system is shown to be smooth and linear.


Other gain control responses (for use with different radio systems and any number of variable gain amplifiers) are possible with similar results provided the basis current Iexp and switching current(s) are shared. In one or more embodiments, the AGC system incorporates a variety of limiting and scaling circuits including, but not limited to, linear, cube, square and square root circuits.



FIG. 11 shows a diagram of one embodiment of an improved square circuit that is suitable for use in one or more embodiments of the AGC system. Diodes D1-D2 plus transistors Q1-Q2 form a translinear loop described by;

ID1ID2=IQ1IQ2


Ideally, the current Ik2 is constant; unfortunately, this is not possible with a standard current mirror. The potential at the emitter of transistor Q1 decreases and nearly vanishes at low current levels (Iin), pushing the current source transistor into saturation (bipolar device) or triode region (MOS device). This differs from the input side of the mirror and results in mismatches. To avoid this, an operational amplifier feedback loop is added. It uses resistor R2 to monitor the current flow through transistor Q1 and adjusts the gate voltage applied to current source transistor N3 accordingly. Current source Ik2 and resistor R1 provide a reference to the operational amplifier 1102.



FIG. 12 shows a diagram of one embodiment of an improved square root circuit that is suitable for use in one or more embodiments of the AGC system. The square root circuit uses operational amplifier feedback to create a constant current source. Transistors Q1-Q4 form a translinear loop where;

IQ1IQ2=(IQ3)2


The input current Iin biases transistor Q1, while a constant current Ik3 is established in transistor N1. As a result;

IQ3=√{square root over (IinIk3)}

which is the desired square-root operation.



FIG. 13 shows a communication network 1300 that includes various communication devices that comprise one or more embodiments of a multi-segment gain control (GC) system. The network 1300 includes multiple network servers, a tablet computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, and an email/pager device all communicating over a wireless data network. Each of the devices includes one or more embodiments of a GC system as described herein. The network 1300 illustrates only some of the devices that may comprise one or more embodiments of a GC system. However, it should be noted that one or more embodiments of a GC system are suitable for use in virtually any type of communication device.


Accordingly, while one or more embodiments of a multi-segment gain control system have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made to the embodiments without departing from their spirit or essential characteristics. Therefore, the disclosures and descriptions herein are intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention, which is set forth in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. Apparatus for providing a multi-segment gain control, the apparatus comprising: logic to convert a gain control signal to an exponential signal; andlogic to map the exponential signal to generate a first control signal and a second control signal; said first control signal and said second control signal provided to independently control a first gain segment and a second gain segment to produce multi-segment gain control; wherein said multi-segment control follows a predefined square law gain characteristic.
  • 2. Apparatus for providing a multi-segment gain control, the apparatus comprising: logic to convert a gain control signal to an exponential signal; andlogic to map the exponential signal to generate a first control signal and a second control signal; said first control signal and said second control signal provided to independently control a first gain segment and a second gain segment to produce multi-segment gain control; wherein said multi-segment control follows a predefined square-root law gain characteristic.
  • 3. Apparatus for providing a multi-segment gain control, the apparatus comprising: logic to convert a gain control signal to an exponential signal; andlogic to map the exponential signal to generate a first control signal and a second control signal; said first control signal and said second control signal provided to independently control a first gain segment and a second gain segment to produce multi-segment gain control; wherein said multi-segment control follows a predefined cubic law gain characteristic.
  • 4. Apparatus for providing multi-segment gain control in a communications device, the apparatus comprising: logic to generate a gain control signal from a control signal, said logic to generate a gain control signal comprising logic to generate an exponential signal; andlogic to map the gain control signal to generate a plurality of gain segment control signals;wherein ones of the gain segment control signals are provided to independently control ones of a plurality of gain control segments to provide a predefined gain characteristic, and wherein said predefined gain characteristic is a square law gain characteristic.
  • 5. Apparatus for providing multi-segment gain control in a communications device, the apparatus comprising: logic to generate a gain control signal from a control signal, said logic to generate a gain control signal comprising logic to generate an exponential signal; andlogic to map the gain control signal to generate a plurality of gain segment control signals;wherein ones of the gain segment control signals are provided to independently control ones of a plurality of gain control segments to provide a predefined gain characteristic, and wherein said predefined gain characteristic is a square root law characteristic.
  • 6. Apparatus for providing multi-segment gain control in a communications device, the apparatus comprising: logic to generate a gain control signal from a control signal said logic to generate a gain control signal comprising logic to generate an exponential signal; andlogic to map the gain control signal to generate a plurality of gain segment control signals;wherein ones of the gain segment control signals are provided to independently control ones of a plurality of gain control segments to provide a predefined gain characteristic, and wherein said predefined gain characteristic is a cubic law gain characteristic.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit of priority from a co-pending U.S. Provisional patent application entitled “System for a Multi-segment AGC Circuit” having Ser. No. 60/533,523 and filed on Dec. 29, 2003, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (125)
Number Name Date Kind
448539 Morris Mar 1891 A
599071 Barr Feb 1898 A
4198675 Moore Apr 1980 A
4263560 Ricker Apr 1981 A
4430627 Machida Feb 1984 A
4769588 Panther Sep 1988 A
4816772 Klotz Mar 1989 A
4926135 Voorman May 1990 A
4965531 Riley Oct 1990 A
4994768 Shepherd et al. Feb 1991 A
5006818 Koyama et al. Apr 1991 A
5015968 Podell et al. May 1991 A
5030923 Arai Jul 1991 A
5289136 DeVeirman et al. Feb 1994 A
5331292 Worden et al. Jul 1994 A
5399990 Miyake Mar 1995 A
5451901 Welland Sep 1995 A
5491450 Helms et al. Feb 1996 A
5508660 Gersbach et al. Apr 1996 A
5548594 Nakamura Aug 1996 A
5561385 Choi Oct 1996 A
5581216 Ruetz Dec 1996 A
5631587 Co et al. May 1997 A
5648744 Prakash et al. Jul 1997 A
5677646 Entrikin Oct 1997 A
5739730 Rotzoll Apr 1998 A
5767748 Nakao Jun 1998 A
5818303 Oishi et al. Oct 1998 A
5834987 Dent Nov 1998 A
5841320 Ichihara Nov 1998 A
5862465 Ou Jan 1999 A
5878101 Aisaka Mar 1999 A
5880618 Koen Mar 1999 A
5880631 Sahota Mar 1999 A
5939922 Umeda Aug 1999 A
5945855 Momtaz Aug 1999 A
5949286 Jones Sep 1999 A
5990740 Groe Nov 1999 A
5994959 Ainsworth Nov 1999 A
5999056 Fong Dec 1999 A
6011437 Sutardja et al. Jan 2000 A
6018651 Bruckert et al. Jan 2000 A
6044124 Monahan et al. Mar 2000 A
6052035 Nolan et al. Apr 2000 A
6057739 Crowley et al. May 2000 A
6060935 Shulman May 2000 A
6091307 Nelson Jul 2000 A
6100767 Sumi Aug 2000 A
6107878 Black Aug 2000 A
6114920 Moon et al. Sep 2000 A
6163207 Kattner et al. Dec 2000 A
6173011 Rey et al. Jan 2001 B1
6191956 Foreman Feb 2001 B1
6204728 Hageraats Mar 2001 B1
6211737 Fong Apr 2001 B1
6229374 Tammone, Jr. May 2001 B1
6234387 Cuthbert et al. May 2001 B1
6246289 Pisati et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255889 Branson Jul 2001 B1
6259321 Song et al. Jul 2001 B1
6288609 Brueske et al. Sep 2001 B1
6298093 Genrich Oct 2001 B1
6333675 Saito Dec 2001 B1
6370372 Molnar et al. Apr 2002 B1
6392487 Alexanian May 2002 B1
6404252 Wilsch Jun 2002 B1
6476660 Visocchi et al. Nov 2002 B1
6515553 Filiol et al. Feb 2003 B1
6525606 Atkinson Feb 2003 B1
6549078 Sridharan et al. Apr 2003 B1
6559717 Lynn et al. May 2003 B1
6560448 Baldwin et al. May 2003 B1
6571083 Powell, II et al. May 2003 B1
6577190 Kim Jun 2003 B2
6583671 Chatwin Jun 2003 B2
6583675 Gomez Jun 2003 B2
6639474 Asikainen et al. Oct 2003 B2
6664865 Groe et al. Dec 2003 B2
6683509 Albon et al. Jan 2004 B2
6693977 Katayama et al. Feb 2004 B2
6703887 Groe Mar 2004 B2
6711391 Walker et al. Mar 2004 B1
6724235 Costa et al. Apr 2004 B2
6734736 Gharpurey May 2004 B2
6744319 Kim Jun 2004 B2
6751272 Burns et al. Jun 2004 B1
6753738 Baird Jun 2004 B1
6763228 Prentice et al. Jul 2004 B2
6774740 Groe Aug 2004 B1
6777999 Kanou et al. Aug 2004 B2
6781425 Si Aug 2004 B2
6791413 Komurasaki et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795843 Groe Sep 2004 B1
6798290 Groe et al. Sep 2004 B2
6801089 Costa et al. Oct 2004 B2
6845139 Gibbons Jan 2005 B2
6856205 Groe Feb 2005 B1
6870411 Shibahara et al. Mar 2005 B2
6894564 Gilbert May 2005 B1
6917719 Chadwick Jul 2005 B2
6940356 McDonald, II et al. Sep 2005 B2
6943600 Craninckx Sep 2005 B2
6975687 Jackson et al. Dec 2005 B2
6985703 Groe et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990327 Zheng et al. Jan 2006 B2
7062248 Kuiri Jun 2006 B2
7065334 Otaka et al. Jun 2006 B1
7088979 Shenoy et al. Aug 2006 B1
7123102 Uozumi et al. Oct 2006 B2
7142062 Vaananen et al. Nov 2006 B2
7148764 Kasahara et al. Dec 2006 B2
7171170 Groe et al. Jan 2007 B2
7215215 Hirano et al. May 2007 B2
20020031191 Shimizu Mar 2002 A1
20020071497 Bengtsson et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020193009 Reed Dec 2002 A1
20020197975 Chen Dec 2002 A1
20030078016 Groe et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030092405 Groe et al. May 2003 A1
20030118143 Bellaouar et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030197564 Humphreys et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040017852 Redman-White Jan 2004 A1
20040051590 Perrott et al. Mar 2004 A1
20050093631 Groe May 2005 A1
20050099232 Groe et al. May 2005 A1
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60533523 Dec 2003 US