The lateral access approach is frequently utilized to deliver interbody fusion cages to the lumbar spine. In comparison to conventional anterior or posterior approaches to the lumbar spine, the lateral approach is thought to minimize posterior and/or anterior tissue damage as well as reduce surgery time, associated blood loss, vascular damage and infection risk.
When multi-level access to the spine is provided through a single minimal access port, the insertion trajectory to the superior and inferior levels is not parallel to the vertebral endplates at those levels.
In addition, direct lateral access parallel to the L4/5 and L5/S1 levels is not achieved due to the presence of the iliac crest directly lateral to those levels. Accordingly, the angled trajectory required for lateral access to these lower levels risks the cages being implanted at a “malpositioned” angle that prevents balanced loading across the vertebral endplates and spine. This “malpositioned” access, associated endplate damage and device placement can initiate subsidence, loss of correction, collapse of the retracted disc space, and result in spinal instability. This may result in increased surgery time, a higher difficulty in insertion and muscle damage.
US2008-0133012 (“McGuckin”) discloses a spinal implant having a series of sections or units hinged together and a balloon connected to at least some of the sections, the balloon having a curved configuration. The implant has a first delivery configuration and a second curved placement configuration, wherein it has a more linear configuration in the first delivery configuration than in the second curved configuration. The implant assumes the first delivery configuration during delivery to the disc space and maintains the curved configuration after placement within the disc space. The curved configuration can result from filling or expanding the balloon.
US2006-0142858 (“Colleran”) discloses methods and apparatuses for maintaining spacing between neighboring vertebrae, while minimizing the size of the surgical opening required. In one embodiment, an expandable spinal implant is made having movable parts that can arranged so as to have a small maximum cross-sectional width so that the cage can be inserted through a smaller surgical opening and then expanded to a full size assembly between the vertebrae.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,387,130 (“Stone”) discloses a method of positioning a plurality of intervertebral implants in a patient's intervertebral space, comprising: introducing an elongated member into the patient's intervertebral space; and sequentially advancing a plurality of intervertebral implants over the elongated member and into the patient's intervertebral space, the plurality of intervertebral implants each having at least one hole passing therethrough, with the elongated member received through the holes passing through each of the plurality of implants.
US Patent Publication No. 2008-0125865 (Custom Spine) discloses an intervertebral fusion device that articulates in the horizontal plane.
US Patent Publication No 2009-0062807 (Vermillion Technologies, LLC) discloses a method for performing percutaneous interbody preparation and placement of an interbody device from a posterolateral orientation via a cannulated, self-distracting tool with a guide mechanism.
US Patent Application 2011-0125266 (Rogers) discloses lateral cage that vertically flex.
The present invention concerns several fusion devices and methods for laterally inserting a fusion device at an initial trajectory that is not parallel to the disc space. Each fusion device incorporates components that enable flexing, bending or pivoting of the device during its final approach to the prepared disc space.
In one embodiment, these fusion devices may be delivered through a disc space access port having a linear longitudinal axis. Once the distal end of the fusion device is inserted through the linear port and into the edge of the disc space, additional force is applied to the device along the longitudinal axis of the proximal portion of the device. This additional force has the effect of flexing the device in the coronal plane. Continued application of force to the flexed device results in advance of the device into the disc space in an orientation that is parallel to the disc space. Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided) a method of implanting a flexible intervertebral fusion device in a disc space in a patient, comprising the steps of:
t
Alternatively, these fusion devices may be delivered through a port that has an elbow in its distal portion. The elbowed shape of this port enables initial delivery of the cage from an incision location above the iliac crest and lateral to the spine, followed by linear advance of the fusion device in the coronal plane at a downward trajectory that is angled with respect to the disc space, and finally flexion of the fusion device in the coronal plane at the elbow so that it may initially enter the disc space with an orientation that is parallel to the disc space. Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided).
a method of implanting an intervertebral fusion device in a disc space in a patient, comprising the steps of:
In a first embodiment, there is provided a flexible intervertebral fusion device. These lateral devices are provided with one or more upper or lower flexion grooves (that make living hinges) that allow flexing in the coronal plane upon passage of the device into the disc space (or into the elbow of the port). The coronal flexion between the various cage segments allows angled advancement and parallel insertion to be accomplished. Following implantation the cage segments act as one fusion cage comprised of interconnected rigid spacers for spinal correction, graft delivery and fusion of the disc space.
The flexion grooves are typically of living hinge design, are provided in polymer-based cages, and may be customized to provide specific material properties and desired ranges of flexion. Desired ranges of flexion vary from 1 to 45 degrees and are dependent upon the number and location of cage segments. The depth and shape of a groove can sometimes range from 10% to 90% of the cage height, with the width of the groove typically ranging from 0.5 mm to 10 mm.
The leading distal edge of the device may be bulleted upon its upper and/or lower aspects to facilitate the device's initial placement into the disc space.
In some embodiments, the coronal flexibility in the fusion device is made by providing an intermediate, reduced height wall that substantially bisects the proximal and distal end walls of the fusion device. Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a flexible lateral intervertebral fusion device comprising:
In a second embodiment, there is provided an intervertebral fusion device having linked cages.
In some embodiments, the flats of these cages engage each other to absorb the impaction force.
In some embodiments, cage components are linked by an articulating snap means that ensures that the device can have a substantially linear orientation during the insertion and advancement portions of the delivery and a substantially curved orientation during its passage into the disc space (or through the elbow portion of the port). In some embodiments thereof, the proximal end wall of a first cage is connected to the distal end wall of a second cage by an articulating joint (such as a hinge) that articulates substantially in the coronal plane. In some embodiments, the joint comprises a ball-and-socket connection, wherein one of the cages comprises the ball component and the other cage comprises the socket component. In some embodiments, the joint is a hinge that articulates substantially only in the coronal plane.
The articulating snap means interconnects the cage components and allows the cage components to flex upon insertion in a manner similar to the flexible cage invention discussed above. The interconnecting linkage can be a snap fit ball joint that allows for articulation in at least the coronal plane, but may also articulate in all planes. Alternatively, the linkage can be designed to limit motion to the coronal plane, as with a dovetail or tongue-and-groove connection.
The articulating linkage can be fixed by pins that both secure the segments and allow for imaging of the implant. The linked cage also allows for intra-operative selection and assembly of the cage component geometries based upon the desired level of correction or endplate geometry at a specific location. This can be advantageous for scoliosis correction or irregular endplates.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a lateral intervertebral fusion device comprising first and second cages, each cage comprising:
a) an anterior wall,
b) a posterior wall,
c) proximal and distal end walls connecting the anterior and posterior walls
wherein the proximal end wall of the first cage is connected to the distal end wall of the second cage by a joint that articulates substantially in the plane of the posterior wall.
In a preferred second embodiment, there is provided a linked fusion device in which a pair of cages are linked by a flexible tape provided on either an upper or lower bearing surface of the cages. The flexible tapes or wires interconnect the cage segments and provide for flexion of the cage segments upon insertion like that of the flexible cage segments disclosed above. Thus, this flexible tape ensures that the cage components are linearly oriented during linear advance of the device through the linear portion of the port, and flexed during their passage into the disc space (or through the elbowed portion of the port). The function of the tape is to provide a flexible connection between the separately manufactured cages, wherein the connection is capable of flexing upon application of a load. The advantage of using an adhesive tape is that the tape can be applied to the cages during the operative procedure, thereby allowing the surgeon to custom-design the fusion device to meet the needs of the particular patient.
The degree of pre-tension and/or material stiffness of the wire or tape can allow for varying levels of flexion in all planes. Although the tape can be placed on any external surface of a cage, it is preferably placed upon the superior and inferior aspects of the device in order to provide for a controlled amount of flexion in the coronal plane while accessing a non-parallel level.
In some embodiments, the tape or wire can be radiopaque. In other embodiments, the tape or wire can be resorbable to allow for controlled separation of the cage components, as controlled cage segment separation may prevent excessive load transfer in one specific location of the disc.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an intervertebral fusion device comprising first, second and third cages and a flexible band, wherein each cage comprises:
a) an anterior wall,
b) a posterior wall,
c) proximal and distal end walls connecting the anterior and posterior walls,
and wherein the flexible band runs from proximal end wall of the first cage, through the second cage and to the distal end of the third cage.
In some embodiments, the cage components are linked by a pretensioned wire through their centers.
In another embodiment, there is provided an intervertebral fusion device having tethered cage components. The cage components can be tethered together with a cord that passes through the proximal and distal end walls of each cage. The tether can also provide a method of advancing the subcomponents into the disc, which guide cage segments. This tether allows the cage components to assemble into a linear configuration during its initial passage through the linear portion of the port, and into a flexed configuration during its passage through the disc space (or through the elbowed portion of the port). Each cage component further has a portion of a securement means (such as a taper interlock) to fixedly join the cage components together once they have all reached the disc space. Preferably, the tether is selected from the group consisting of a cord, a suture, a wire tie, and a chain. The tether can include both advancement and securement features.
The interconnecting tether or suture can also provide a method to advance the subcomponents into the disc while allowing flexion between the various cage segments. The tether can be a simple cord or a suture, which is tensioned as desired. The tether can also be comprised of a wire tie design, or a chain with snaps that hold the cage components together.
Once all of the cage components have been assembled in situ, the tether can be removed from the patient. In other embodiments, the tether is made of a resorbable material so that it is gradually removed over time.
d-g disclose various views of the stepwise construction of an assembly of the present invention having three taper lock cage components and a wire passing therethrough.
For the purposes of the present invention, insertion or access path that is “substantially in the coronal plane” means insertion +/−30 degrees of an anterior-posterior midline. Preferably, the insertion or access path is between 0 degrees and +30 degrees of the anterior-posterior midline. More preferably, the insertion or access path is between 0 degrees and +15 degrees of the anterior-posterior midline. In some embodiments, the insertion or access path is at about 0 degrees of the anterior-posterior midline.
Now referring to
In order to promote fusion through the flexible device of the present invention, the walls of the device are commonly provided with throughholes. For example, in
In order to promote distraction of the disc space upon entry of the device into the spine, the distal wall of the first cage typically has a bulleted nose 33.
In some embodiments, the proximal wall of the third cage has an attachment feature 34 to allow for threaded attachment to an insertion device.
In order to promote gripping to the opposing vertebral endplates, the upper and lower surfaces of the cages can possess a plurality of teeth 35.
In some embodiments, as in
In some embodiments, as in
Now referring to
First, an access portal from the patient's skin to the target disc is prepared, and a disc space is prepared. This can be carried out in accordance with the procedures described in U.S. Ser. No. 61/358,220, filed on Jun. 24, 2010, and entitled “Instruments and Methods for Non-Parallel Disc Space Preparation”, and to U.S. Ser. No. 61/379,194, filed on Sep. 1, 2010, and entitled “Flexible Vertebral Body Shavers”, the specifications of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Next, the flexible cage of the present invention is inserted into the access portal and carried to the disc space. The flexible cage has a trajectory that is angled with respect to the disc space. As shown in
Although these
Now referring to
In some embodiments, the first cage comprises a projection having an articulating surface, while the second cage comprises a recess having a mating articulating surface.
In some embodiments, the proximal end wall of the first cage comprises a projection having an articulating surface and the distal end wall of the second cage comprises a recess having a mating articulating surface.
In some embodiments, the proximal end wall of the first cage comprises a recess 63 having an articulating surface 64, and the distal end wall of the second cage comprises a projection 65 having a mating articulating surface 66.
In some embodiments, now referring to
In some embodiments, and now referring to
In some embodiments, and now referring to
In some embodiments, as in
Now referring to
In other embodiments, the first and third cages each comprise a projection having an articulating surface, while the second cage comprises proximal and distal recesses each having a mating articulating surface.
In some embodiments, there is provided an exploded view of a device in which four cages are sequentially linked by three joints. The lead cage has a bullet nose on its distal end wall and a recess joint component on its proximal end wall. The second cage has a projection joint component on its distal end wall and a recess joint component on its proximal end wall. The third cage has a projection joint component on its distal end wall and a recess joint component on its proximal end wall. The second cage has a projection joint component on its distal end wall and an attachment feature (i.e., a threaded hole) on its proximal end wall.
In some embodiments, and now referring to
In some embodiments, such as the device shown in
In general, the height, width or lordotic angle of the cage be varied across cages within the device. This can be conveniently described as varying the individual silhouettes of the anterior walls of the respective cages within a device.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a lateral intervertebral fusion device comprising first and second cages, each cage comprising:
a) an anterior wall having a silhouette,
b) a posterior wall having a height and a width, and
c) proximal and distal end walls connecting the anterior and posterior walls,
wherein the proximal end wall of the first cage is connected to the distal end wall of the second cage by a joint that articulates substantially in a plane of the posterior wall,
wherein the silhouette of the anterior wall of the first cage is different from the silhouette of the anterior wall of the second cage.
The intent of providing an articulation within the device is to achieve articulation within the coronal plane so as to allow vertical bending of the device during its angled, lateral insertion. Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided a method comprising the step of inserting into a disc space a lateral intervertebral fusion device comprising first and second cages, each cage comprising:
a) an anterior wall,
b) a posterior wall,
c) proximal and distal end walls connecting the anterior and posterior walls
wherein the proximal end wall of the first cage is connected to the distal end wall of the second cage by a joint,
wherein the device is oriented such that the joint articulates substantially in the coronal plane.
In use, the jointed device of the present invention is made by first selecting the appropriate cages desired in the device. Next, the surgeon laterally slides the projection component of a first cage into the recess of its mating cage. Next, the surgeon secures the joint by placing the pins in the vertical throughholes located in the wall forming the recess of the mating cage. This assembly process is repeated until the desired device is constructed.
The device so constructed is then used in a manner substantially similar to the flexible cage discussed above, as shown in
Now referring to
a) an anterior wall 109,
b) a posterior wall 106,
c) proximal 107 and distal 108 end walls connecting the anterior and posterior walls,
and wherein the flexible band runs from proximal end wall of the first cage, through the second cage and to the distal end of the third cage.
Preferably, the flexible band can be pre-tensioned, thereby providing a controlled amount of stiffness of the construct's flexibility.
Now referring to
a) an anterior wall having an upper surface and a lower surface,
b) a posterior wall 115 having an upper surface 116 and a lower surface 117,
c) proximal 118 and distal 119 end walls connecting the anterior and posterior walls,
and wherein the adhesive tape is adhered to the cages along the upper surface of the proximal end wall of the first cage, across the second cage and to the upper surface distal end of the third cage.
In an alternate tape embodiments, there is provided a lateral intervertebral fusion device comprising first, second and third cages and an adhesive tape, wherein each cage comprises:
d) an anterior wall having an upper surface and a lower surface,
e) a posterior wall having an upper surface and a lower surface,
f) proximal and distal end walls connecting the anterior and posterior walls,
and wherein the adhesive tape is adhered to the cages along the lower surface of the proximal end wall of the first cage, across the second cage and to the lower surface distal end of the third cage.
The device so constructed is then used in a manner substantially similar to the flexible cage discussed above, as shown in
In some embodiments, the cages are individually and sequentially introduced into the disc space. Once in the disc space, they are connected to each other by an interconnection means (such as a snap-fit connection) located on their proximal and distal end walls.
Now referring to
In some embodiments, the securement means is a snap-connection 161. In some embodiments, the snap-connection comprises a male component 162 and a female component 163.
In some embodiments, there are at least two tethers that pass through two sets of holes to provide delivery guidance to the cages.
In using the snap cage of the present invention, and now referring to
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of implanting an intervertebral fusion device in a disc space in a patient, comprising the steps of:
The cages of the present invention may be made from any non-resorbable material appropriate for human surgical implantation, including but not limited to, surgically appropriate metals, and non-metallic materials, such as carbon fiber composites, polymers and ceramics.
The interbody devices are preferably made out of PEEK or CFRP or any other suitable material providing adequate strength and radiolucency. However, implantable metals such as titanium or stainless steel components may be required to ensure adequate strength for either the interbody device. In some cases the interbody device can be made as a combination of PEEK and metal. In some cases, resorbable materials such as polylactide, polyglycolide, and magnesium are preferred.
In some embodiments, the cage material is selected from the group consisting of PEEK, ceramic and metallic. The cage material is preferably selected from the group consisting of metal and composite (such as PEEK/carbon fiber).
If a metal is chosen as the material of construction for a component, then the metal is preferably selected from the group consisting of titanium, titanium alloys (such as Ti-6Al-4V), chrome alloys (such as CrCo or Cr—Co—Mo) and stainless steel.
If a polymer is chosen as a material of construction for a component, then the polymer is preferably selected from the group consisting of polyesters, (particularly aromatic esters such as polyalkylene terephthalates, polyamides; polyalkenes; poly(vinyl fluoride); PTFE; polyarylethyl ketone PAEK; polyphenylene and mixtures thereof.
If a ceramic is chosen as the material of construction for a component, then the ceramic is preferably selected from the group consisting of alumina, zirconia and mixtures thereof. It is preferred to select an alumina-zirconia ceramic, such as BIOLOX Delta™, available from CeramTec of Plochingen, Germany. Depending on the material chosen, a smooth surface coating may be provided thereon to improve performance and reduce particulate wear debris.
In some embodiments, the cage member comprises PEEK. In others, it is a ceramic.
In some embodiments, the first component consists essentially of a metallic material, preferably a titanium alloy or a chrome-cobalt alloy.
In some embodiments, the components are made of a stainless steel alloy, preferably BioDur® CCM Plus® Alloy available from Carpenter Specialty Alloys, Carpenter Technology Corporation of Wyomissing, Pa. In some embodiments, the outer surfaces of the components are coated with a sintered beadcoating, preferably Porocoat™, available from DePuy Orthopaedics of Warsaw, Ind.
In some embodiments, the components are made from a composite comprising carbon fiber. Composites comprising carbon fiber are advantageous in that they typically have a strength and stiffness that is superior to neat polymer materials such as a polyarylethyl ketone PAEK. In some embodiments, each component is made from a polymer composite such as a PEKK-carbon fiber composite.
Preferably, the composite comprising carbon fiber further comprises a polymer. Preferably, the polymer is a polyarylethyl ketone (PAEK). More preferably, the PAEK is selected from the group consisting of polyetherether ketone (PEEK), polyether ketone ketone (PEKK) and polyether ketone (PEK). In preferred embodiments, the PAEK is PEEK.
In some embodiments, the carbon fiber comprises between 1 vol % and 60 vol % (more preferably, between 10 vol % and 50 vol %) of the composite. In some embodiments, the polymer and carbon fibers are homogeneously mixed. In others, the material is a laminate. In some embodiments, the carbon fiber is present in a chopped state. Preferably, the chopped carbon fibers have a median length of between 1 mm and 12 mm, more preferably between 4.5 mm and 7.5 mm. In some embodiments, the carbon fiber is present as continuous strands.
In especially preferred embodiments, the composite comprises:
a) 40-99% (more preferably, 60-80 vol %) polyarylethyl ketone (PAEK), and
b) 1-60% (more preferably, 20-40 vol %) carbon fiber,
wherein the polyarylethyl ketone (PAEK) is selected from the group consisting of polyetherether ketone (PEEK), polyether ketone ketone (PEKK) and polyether ketone (PEK).
In some embodiments, the composite consists essentially of PAEK and carbon fiber. More preferably, the composite comprises 60-80 wt % PAEK and 20-40 wt % carbon fiber. Still more preferably the composite comprises 65-75 wt % PAEK and 25-35 wt % carbon fiber.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to its preferred embodiments, those skillful in the art will recognize changes that may be made in form and structure which do not depart from the spirit of the invention.
In other embodiments, the components are made from resorbable materials, such as Biocryl Rapide™, a PLA, PLG, TCP composite marketed by DePuy Mitek, located in Raynham, Mass.
When resorbable materials are selected, Preferred bioresorbable materials which can be used to make the sutures of the present invention include bioresorbable polymers or copolymers, preferably selected from the group consisting of hydroxy acids, (particularly lactic acids and glycolic acids; caprolactone; hydroxybutyrate; dioxanone; orthoesters; orthocarbonates; and aminocarbonates). Preferred bioresorbable materials also include natural materials such as chitosan, collagen, cellulose, fibrin, hyaluronic acid; fibronectin, and mixtures thereof. However, synthetic bioresorbable materials are preferred because they can be manufactured under process specifications which insure repeatable properties.
A variety of bioabsorbable polymers can be used to make the suture of the present invention. Examples of suitable biocompatible, bioabsorbable polymers include but are not limited to polymers selected from the group consisting of aliphatic polyesters, poly(amino acids), copoly(ether-esters), polyalkylenes oxalates, polyamides, tyrosine derived polycarbonates, poly(iminocarbonates), polyorthoesters, polyoxaesters, polyamidoesters, polyoxaesters containing amine groups, poly(anhydrides), polyphosphazenes, biomolecules (i.e., biopolymers such as collagen, elastin, bioabsorbable starches, etc.) and blends thereof. For the purpose of this invention aliphatic polyesters include, but are not limited to, homopolymers and copolymers of lactide (which includes lactic acid, D-,L- and meso lactide), glycolide (including glycolic acid), ε-caprolactone, p-dioxanone (1,4-dioxan-2-one), trimethylene carbonate (1,3-dioxan-2-one), alkyl derivatives of trimethylene carbonate, δ-valerolactone, β-butyrolactone, χ-butyrolactone, ε-decalactone, hydroxybutyrate, hydroxyvalerate, 1,4-dioxepan-2-one (including its dimer 1,5,8,12-tetraoxacyclotetradecane-7,14-dione), 1,5-dioxepan-2-one, 6,6-dimethyl-1,4-dioxan-2-one, 2,5-diketomorpholine, pivalolactone, χ,χ-diethylpropiolactone, ethylene carbonate, ethylene oxalate, 3-methyl-1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione, 3,3-diethyl-1,4-dioxan-2,5-dione, 6,8-dioxabicycloctane-7-one and polymer blends thereof. Poly(iminocarbonates), for the purpose of this invention, are understood to include those polymers as described by Kemnitzer and Kohn, in the Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers, edited by Domb, et. al., Hardwood Academic Press, pp. 251-272 (1997). Copoly(ether-esters), for the purpose of this invention, are understood to include those copolyester-ethers as described in the Journal of Biomaterials Research, Vol. 22, pages 993-1009, 1988 by Cohn and Younes, and in Polymer Preprints (ACS Division of Polymer Chemistry), Vol. 30(1), page 498, 1989 by Cohn (e.g. PEO/PLA). Polyalkylene oxalates, for the purpose of this invention, include those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,208,511; 4,141,087; 4,130,639; 4,140,678; 4,105,034; and 4,205,399. Polyphosphazenes, co-, ter- and higher order mixed monomer-based polymers made from L-lactide, D,L-lactide, lactic acid, glycolide, glycolic acid, para-dioxanone, trimethylene carbonate and ε-caprolactone such as are described by Allcock in The Encyclopedia of Polymer Science, Vol. 13, pages 31-41, Wiley Intersciences, John Wiley & Sons, 1988 and by Vandorpe, et al in the Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers, edited by Domb, et al, Hardwood Academic Press, pp. 161-182 (1997). Polyanhydrides include those derived from diacids of the form HOOC—C6H4—O—(CH2)m—O—C6H4—COOH, where m is an integer in the range of from 2 to 8, and copolymers thereof with aliphatic alpha-omega diacids of up to 12 carbons. Polyoxaesters, polyoxaamides and polyoxaesters containing amines and/or amido groups are described in one or more of the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,464,929; 5,595,751; 5,597,579; 5,607,687; 5,618,552; 5,620,698; 5,645,850; 5,648,088; 5,698,213; 5,700,583; and 5,859,150. Polyorthoesters such as those described by Heller in Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers, edited by Domb, et al, Hardwood Academic Press, pp. 99-118 (1997).
In another embodiment, there is provided an intervertebral fusion device having multiple cage components inserted into the disc space via a guide wire, wherein the cage components are inserted either sequentially or together as an assembly. The first (distal) cage component possesses a bulleted feature (e.g., either a substantially wedged or substantially conical shape) on the leading (distal) face for distraction of the vertebral endplates, and an opening in at least its proximal faces. This cage is fed with a wire (such as a K-wire, cable, tether, or braid) into the disc space, whereby the wire is received in the opening(s) of the cage component. The wire and cage may be assembled just prior to surgery, or they may be pre-assembled, such as through manufacturing methods that use molds, threaded anchors, mechanical interlocks, or adhesives.
An optional intermediate cage component may also be used. It has openings (as throughholes) in its proximal and distal end faces, wherein the throughholes are likewise able to receive and pass the wire.
The opening of either cage component may be a hole in the proximal or distal end faces that allows an end of the wire to be inserted through the component. In other embodiments, the opening may be a slot that allows the cage component to be assembled with the wire from a slot in a side wall (i.e., anterior wall or posterior wall) of the cage component.
This embodiment further comprises a final cage component, wherein the final cage component has an opening in each of its distal and proximal faces for receiving the wire and a mating feature adapted to secure the wire to the final cage component. This mating feature, which is located proximal to the proximal face of this final component, may be a clamp, plug, threaded device, or other mechanical interlock.
The opposing faces of adjacent cage components may be fixedly joined together after insertion via locking means. Some exemplary locking means may include a snap-fit, a taper lock, and other mechanical interlock features that promote rigidity in the assembled device. Alternatively, the assembly may possess articulating interconnections at the interfaces by using joint-making shapes, such as a ball-and-socket joint or a cylinder-and-groove joint, to promote articulation of the device.
The wire may be disengaged from the cage components upon completion of cage insertion. This may be accomplished by turning and removing the entire wire (if the wire is secured by a threaded connection), or by severing the portion of the wire extending proximally from the final cage component.
Also in accordance with the present invention is a surgical instrument for advancing a cage component on a wire, the instrument comprising:
In some embodiments, the cages are individually and sequentially introduced into the disc space via a guide wire connected to the first cage. Once in the disc space, they may be connected to each other by, for example, a snap-fit connection located on their proximal and distal end walls.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an assembly comprising i) an intervertebral fusion device comprising first and second fusion cages and ii) a wire, each fusion cage comprising:
a) an anterior wall,
b) a posterior wall, and
c) proximal and distal end walls connecting the anterior and posterior walls,
wherein each fusion cage has at least one opening passing at least partially through either its distal or proximal end wall, and
wherein the wire passes through the at least one opening in each cage.
In some embodiments, the cages are secured together through connectors such as a snap-connection 161. In some embodiments, the snap-connection comprises a male component 162 and a female component 163.
Distal cage 201 has a distal wall 207 having a bullet nose 209 and a proximal wall 211 having a generally concave shape. It further has an upper wall 213, a lower wall 215, an anterior wall 217, and a posterior wall (not shown), with each of these having a fusion-promoting opening 219 therethrough. Lastly, distal cage 201 has a slot 221 opening upon both its proximal and anterior walls. This slot is adapted to receive the wire of the assembly. Alternative, the slot may be replaced with a partially threaded hole that is unthreaded at its end.
Intermediate cage 203 has a distal wall 227 having a convex shape and a proximal wall 231 having a generally convex shape. It further has an upper wall 233, a lower wall 235, a anterior wall 237, and a posterior wall (not shown), with each of these having a fusion-promoting opening 239 therethrough. Intermediate cage 203 further has a distal throughole 240 opening through its distal wall, a vertical cross bar 238 extending between the upper and lower walls and having a throughole 236 therethrough, and a proximal throughhole 241 opening through its proximal wall. These throughholes 240, 236 and 241 are adapted to receive the wire of the assembly.
Proximal cage 205 has a distal wall 247 having a concave shape and a generally flat proximal wall 251. It further has an upper wall 253, a lower wall 255, an anterior wall 257, and a posterior wall (not shown), with each of these having a fusion-promoting opening 259 therethrough. Proximal cage further has a distal throughole 260 opening through its distal wall, and a proximal throughhole 261 opening through its proximal wall. These throughholes 260,261 are adapted to receive the wire of the assembly.
Distal cage 301 has a distal wall 307 having a bullet nose 309 and a proximal wall 311 having a tapered projection 312. It further has an upper wall 313, a lower wall 315, an anterior wall 317, and a posterior wall (not shown), with each of these having a fusion-promoting opening 319 therethrough. Lastly, distal cage 301 has a slot 321 opening upon both its proximal and anterior walls. This slot is adapted to receive the wire of the assembly.
Intermediate cage 303 has a distal wall 327 having a tapered recess 328 and a proximal wall 331 having a tapered recess 332. It further has an upper wall 333, a lower wall 335, a anterior wall 337, and a posterior wall (not shown), with each of these having a fusion-promoting opening 339 therethrough. Intermediate cage 303 further has a distal throughole 340 opening through its distal wall, a vertical cross bar 338 extending between the upper and lower walls and having a throughole 336 therethrough, and a proximal throughhole 341 opening through its proximal wall. These throughholes 340, 336 and 341 are adapted to receive the wire of the assembly.
Proximal cage 305 has a distal wall 347 having a tapered projection 348 and a generally flat proximal wall 351. It further has an upper wall 353, a lower wall 355, an anterior wall 357, and a posterior wall (not shown), with each of these having a fusion-promoting opening 359 therethrough. This slot is adapted to receive the wire of the assembly. Proximal cage further has a distal throughole 360 opening through its distal wall, and a proximal throughhole 361 opening through its proximal wall. These throughholes 360, 361 are adapted to receive the wire of the assembly.
In some embodiments of the present invention, an intermediate cage is characterized by asymmetry about its midline—that is, the cage has either mateable projections at both ends or mateable recesses at both ends.
In some embodiments, the leading and/or trailing cages of an assembly may be solid (i.e., like a ramp) and thus are not capable of holding bone graft material. Typically, fusion cages are made in a manner so that the internal surfaces thereof are relatively smooth. However, the smoothness of these surfaces may help bone graft fall out from the cage during handling. Therefore, in some embodiments, the cages are adapted to better hold graft material.
Now referring to
Typically, the translating sleeve is made of a flexible plastic that can accommodate a curved, lateral trajectory into lower lumbar discs.
In using the instrument with the cages of the present invention, the surgeon typically performs the following steps:
Therefore, this instrument provides the surgeon with a way of incrementally advancing the cage component to a taper-locked position in the disc space in a safe and controlled manner without having to impact the cage component about the guidewire.
It has been noted that the interior surfaces of interbody cages and vertebral body replacements are typically made of machined or molded surfaces, and these surfaces are typically very smooth. Although the smooth surface provides high strength, it does very little to retain the bone graft material that is often inserted into the cage.
Therefore, it is now contemplated to provide textured surfaces or projections upon the inner surfaces of the cage. These projections project into the graft volume, thus providing a mechanical resistance to graft along the interior face. These projections will help maintain the bone graft material in the cage. This technique could be especially advantageous in cases where there is no side window, such as where a graft window could decrease mechanical strength, or in cages holding a large graft volume.
Alternative inner surface designs having projections or coarse texture could be easily manufactured and require no additional steps to perform during surgery.
In some embodiments, the inner surface of the cage is machined to possess a coarse surface roughness Ra of at least 100 μm, more preferably a coarse surface roughness of at least 500 μm, more preferably a coarse surface roughness of at least 1 mm. These surfaces may be characterized as coarse surfaces.
In other embodiments, the inner surface of the cage has a plurality of teeth molded thereon. The height of such teeth may be in the range of about 0.5 mm to about 3 mm. The shapes of such teeth may include, square, scalloped and triangular. The teeth may run linearly in a parallel fashion to the upper and lower surfaces of the cage, as shown below. Alternatively, the teeth may extend at an angle to the upper and lower surfaces, either in a repeating manner, as shown below:
In such toothed embodiments, it is contemplated that an inner wall may a matrix of teeth characterized by about 2-3 teeth traversing its height and about 4-6 teeth spanning its length.
In some embodiments, the cage may have a first inner wall having either a coarse surface or teeth projecting therefrom, and a second wall that is relatively smooth. In such embodiments, it is preferable that the smooth surface occupy a windowless wall.
In other embodiments, the cage's inner surfaces may have both a coarse texture and teeth.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an intervertebral fusion cages, comprising:
This application claims priority from provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/385,958, filed Sep. 23, 2010, entitled Multi-Segment Lateral Cages adapted to Flex Substantially in the Coronal Plane, and from provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/410,177 filed Nov. 4, 2010 entitled Multi-Segment Lateral Cages adapted to Flex Substantially in the Coronal Plane, the specifications of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. This application claims priority from provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/358,220, filed Jun. 24, 2010, entitled Instruments and Methods for Non-Parallel Disc Space Preparation, and is related to non-provisional U.S. Ser. No. 13/163,471, filed on even date, entitled Instruments and Methods for Non-Parallel Disc Space Preparation, the specifications of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. This application claims priority from U.S. Ser. No. 61/379,194, filed on Sep. 1, 2010, and entitled “Flexible Vertebral Body Shavers”, and is related to non-provisional U.S. Ser. No. 13/163,496, filed on even date, entitled “Flexible Vertebral Body Shavers”, the specifications of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. This application claims priority from provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/397,716, filed Nov. 30, 2010, and entitled “Lateral Spondylolisthesis Reduction Cage”, and is related to non-provisional U.S. Ser. No. 61/397,716, filed on even date, entitled “Lateral Spondylolisthesis Reduction Cage”, the specifications of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. This application claims priority from provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/466,302, filed Mar. 22, 2011, and entitled “Universal Trial for Cages”, and is related to non-provisional U.S. Ser. No. 13/163,397, filed on even date, entitled “Universal Trial for Cages”, the specifications of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4105034 | Shalaby | Aug 1978 | A |
4130639 | Shalaby | Dec 1978 | A |
4140678 | Shalaby | Feb 1979 | A |
4141087 | Shalaby | Feb 1979 | A |
4205399 | Shalaby | Jun 1980 | A |
4208511 | Shalaby | Jun 1980 | A |
4538612 | Patrick, Jr. | Sep 1985 | A |
4834757 | Brantigan | May 1989 | A |
4863476 | Shepperd | Sep 1989 | A |
4995200 | Eberhart | Feb 1991 | A |
5006121 | Hafeli | Apr 1991 | A |
5019082 | Frey | May 1991 | A |
5123926 | Piahsrodi | Jun 1992 | A |
5133719 | Winston | Jul 1992 | A |
5163939 | Winston | Nov 1992 | A |
5169402 | Elloy | Dec 1992 | A |
5171278 | Pisharodi | Dec 1992 | A |
5217475 | Kuber | Jun 1993 | A |
5250061 | Michelson | Oct 1993 | A |
5320644 | Baumgartner | Jun 1994 | A |
5342365 | Waldman | Aug 1994 | A |
5387215 | Fisher | Feb 1995 | A |
5390683 | Pisharodi | Feb 1995 | A |
5454815 | Geisser | Oct 1995 | A |
5454827 | Aust | Oct 1995 | A |
5464929 | Bezwada | Nov 1995 | A |
5522899 | Michelson | Jun 1996 | A |
5540693 | Fisher | Jul 1996 | A |
5554191 | Lahille | Sep 1996 | A |
5595751 | Bezwada | Jan 1997 | A |
5597579 | Bezwada | Jan 1997 | A |
5601561 | Terry | Feb 1997 | A |
5607687 | Bezwada | Mar 1997 | A |
5618552 | Bezwada | Apr 1997 | A |
5620698 | Bezwada | Apr 1997 | A |
5645850 | Bezwada | Jul 1997 | A |
5648088 | Bezwada | Jul 1997 | A |
5658335 | Allen | Aug 1997 | A |
5665122 | Kambin | Sep 1997 | A |
5693100 | Pisharodi | Dec 1997 | A |
5698213 | Jamiolkowski | Dec 1997 | A |
5700583 | Jamiolkowski | Dec 1997 | A |
5725531 | Shapiro | Mar 1998 | A |
5857995 | Thomas | Jan 1999 | A |
5859150 | Jamiolkowski | Jan 1999 | A |
5865848 | Baker | Feb 1999 | A |
5916228 | Ripich | Jun 1999 | A |
5925056 | Thomas | Jul 1999 | A |
5976187 | Richelsoph | Nov 1999 | A |
5980522 | Koros | Nov 1999 | A |
6039761 | Li | Mar 2000 | A |
6045579 | Hochshuler et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053922 | Krause | Apr 2000 | A |
6056763 | Parsons | May 2000 | A |
6066175 | Henderson | May 2000 | A |
6080158 | Lin | Jun 2000 | A |
6106557 | Robioneck | Aug 2000 | A |
6120508 | Grunig | Sep 2000 | A |
6126689 | Brett | Oct 2000 | A |
6139558 | Wagner | Oct 2000 | A |
6176882 | Biedermann | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6241733 | Nicholson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251140 | Marino | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258093 | Edwards | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6296644 | Saurat et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
D450676 | Huttner | Nov 2001 | S |
6332894 | Stalcup et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342074 | Simpson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6387130 | Stone | May 2002 | B1 |
6398793 | McGuire | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409766 | Brett | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413278 | Marchosky | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436101 | Hamada | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447518 | Krause | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6595998 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6610066 | Dinger | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6635060 | Hanson | Oct 2003 | B2 |
RE38335 | Aust | Nov 2003 | E |
6641582 | Hanson | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660004 | Barker | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6733535 | Michelson | May 2004 | B2 |
6746451 | Middleton | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755837 | Ebner | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764491 | Frey | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6835208 | Marchosky | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6840941 | Rogers | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6878167 | Ferree | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6949108 | Holmes | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6966912 | Michelson | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7018415 | McKay | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7060073 | Frey | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7070598 | Lim | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087055 | Lim | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7125424 | Banick | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7226482 | Messerli | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7326248 | Michelson | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7351262 | Bindseil | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7470273 | Dougherty-Shah | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7491237 | Randall | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7503920 | Siegal | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7572279 | Jackson | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7575580 | Lim | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7578820 | Moore | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7601173 | Messerli | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7618458 | Biedermann | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625377 | Veldhuizen | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7625394 | Molz, IV | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7655010 | Serhan et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7666186 | Harp | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7666226 | Schaller | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7670374 | Schaller | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7674265 | Smith | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682400 | Zwirkoski | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7703727 | Selness | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704280 | Lechmann | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7731751 | Butler | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7763028 | Lim | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7771473 | Thramann | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785368 | Schaller | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7799081 | McKinley | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7803161 | Foley | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7828849 | Lim | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837734 | Zucherman | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7850733 | Baynham | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7918874 | Siegal | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7922719 | Ralph | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7938857 | Garcia-Bengochea | May 2011 | B2 |
7942903 | Moskowitz | May 2011 | B2 |
7963967 | Woods | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8007535 | Hudgins | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8012212 | Link | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8025697 | McClellan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8034110 | Garner et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8038703 | Dobak, III | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043293 | Warnick | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8057544 | Schaller | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8105382 | Olmos | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8128700 | Delurio | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8206423 | Siegal | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8216317 | Thibodeau | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8241364 | Hansell | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8262666 | Baynham | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8267939 | Cipoletti | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8343193 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8343222 | Cope | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366777 | Matthis | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8382842 | Greenhalgh et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8403990 | Dryer et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8454617 | Schaller et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8470043 | Schaller | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8579981 | Lim | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8628577 | Jimenez | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8663331 | McClellan et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8758349 | Germain | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8845733 | O'Neil et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8920506 | McGuckin, Jr. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8926704 | Glerum et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8940050 | Laurence et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8961609 | Schaller | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8968408 | Schaller et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9101488 | Malandain | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9101492 | Mangione | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20020138078 | Chappuis | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143399 | Sutcliffe | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165550 | Frey | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030028251 | Matthews | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030135275 | Garcia | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139812 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030191531 | Berry | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040002761 | Rogers et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030387 | Landry | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059337 | Hanson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068269 | Bonati | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083000 | Keller | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087947 | Lim et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102784 | Pasquet | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102846 | Keller | May 2004 | A1 |
20040127990 | Bartish | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040220668 | Eisermann | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050038431 | Bartish | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050096745 | Andre | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119752 | Williams et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149034 | Assell | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165420 | Cha | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165484 | Ferree | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171541 | Boehm | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177173 | Aebi | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050240193 | Layne | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060036244 | Spitler | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058807 | Landry | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064101 | Arramon | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064102 | Ebner | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069436 | Sutton | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074429 | Ralph | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100622 | Jackson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111715 | Jackson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111728 | Abdou | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122701 | Kiester | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129244 | Ensign | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142858 | Colleran et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060167547 | Suddaby | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060189999 | Zwirkoski | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212118 | Abernathie | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229627 | Hunt | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229724 | Lechmann | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235426 | Lim | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253120 | Anderson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060254784 | Hartmann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265077 | Zwirkoski | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293753 | Thramann | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070055264 | Parmigiani | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055272 | Schaller | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067035 | Falahee | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093897 | Gerbec | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093901 | Grotz et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070142843 | Dye | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162132 | Messerli | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070213737 | Schermerhorn | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213826 | Smith | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225726 | Dye | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225815 | Keith | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233130 | Suddaby | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250167 | Bray et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260314 | Biyani | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270957 | Heinz | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270968 | Baynham | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080027544 | Melkent | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027550 | Link | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045966 | Buttermann | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051890 | Waugh | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058933 | Garner | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065082 | Chang | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077150 | Nguyen | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077241 | Nguyen | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082173 | Delurio | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091211 | Gately | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097454 | DeRidder | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108990 | Mitchell | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119935 | Alvarez | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125865 | Abdelgany | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133012 | McGuckin | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140085 | Gately et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147129 | Biedermann et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154379 | Steiner | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080172128 | Perez-Cruet et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080208255 | Siegal | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221586 | Garcia-Bengochea | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221687 | Viker | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234732 | Landry | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234733 | Scrantz | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243126 | Gutierrez | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243255 | Butler | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249628 | Altarac et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255563 | Farr | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255574 | Dye | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269904 | Voorhies | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080312743 | Vila | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030423 | Puno | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090054898 | Gleason | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054911 | Mueller | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062807 | Song | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076607 | Aalsma | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088789 | O'Neil | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112217 | Hester | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090143859 | McClellan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182431 | Butler et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192616 | Zielinski | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090216234 | Farr | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090234364 | Crook | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240335 | Arcenio | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090276049 | Weiland | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299479 | Jones | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100016968 | Moore | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030217 | Mitusina | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076502 | Guyer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094422 | Hansell | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100098 | Norton | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100125334 | Krueger | May 2010 | A1 |
20100174321 | Schaller | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185290 | Compton | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191241 | McCormack | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198263 | Siegal | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211107 | Muhanna | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217269 | Landes | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100234849 | Bouadi | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249935 | Slivka | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256768 | Lim | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274358 | Mueller et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280619 | Yuan | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305700 | Ben-Arye | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100305704 | Messerli | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331845 | Foley | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004216 | Amendola | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110009970 | Puno | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029083 | Hynes | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110029085 | Hynes et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110035011 | Cain | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110106260 | Laurence | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112586 | Guyer | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125266 | Rodgers | May 2011 | A1 |
20110190891 | Suh et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110276142 | Niemiec | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282459 | McClellan et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301712 | Palmatier et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319898 | O'Neil | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319899 | O'Neil | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319998 | O'Neil et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319999 | O'Neil | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320000 | O'Neil | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120035730 | Spann | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120209383 | Tsuang | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120277877 | Smith | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120310352 | DiMauro et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006362 | Biedermann | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023937 | Biedermann | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130035762 | Siegal et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130079790 | Stein | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130109925 | Horton | May 2013 | A1 |
20130110239 | Siegal et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130116791 | Theofilos | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138214 | Greenhalgh et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130150906 | Kerboul | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173004 | Greenhalgh et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130190875 | Shulock | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130238006 | O'Neil | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268077 | You | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130310937 | Pimenta | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140025170 | Lim | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140039626 | Mitchell | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052259 | Garner et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058512 | Petersheim | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058513 | Gahman | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140172103 | O'Neil | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172105 | Frasier | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150032212 | O'Neil | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150094812 | Cain | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150196400 | Dace | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160038306 | O'neil | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10357960 | Jul 2005 | DE |
609084 | Sep 1997 | EP |
1283026 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1405602 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1605836 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1308132 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1829486 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2874814 | Mar 2006 | FR |
2948277 | Jan 2011 | FR |
WO 9214423 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO 9834568 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9960956 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 9963914 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0024343 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0203870 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 03003951 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2004069033 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004080316 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2005094297 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2006072941 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006118944 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006044920 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007048012 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2010011348 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2010075555 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2010121002 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011013047 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO 2011060087 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2012027490 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012103254 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012129197 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2013149611 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US, 5,545,827, Oct. 3, 1995, Aust, Gilbert M., (withdrawn). |
Vandorpe, “Biodegradable Polyphosphazenes for Biomedical Applications”; Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers; 1997; pp. 161-182; Hardwood Academic Press. |
Allcock, “Polyphosphazenes”; The Encyclopedia of Polymer Science; 1988; pp. 31-41; vol. 13; Wiley Intersciences, John Wiley & Sons. |
Cohn, “Polymer Preprints”; Journal of Biomaterials Research; 1989; p. 498; Biomaterials Research Labortatory, Casali Institute of Applied Chemistry, Israel. |
Cohn, “Biodegradable PEO/PLA Block Copolymers”; Journal of Biomedical Materials Research; 1988; pp. 993-1009; vol. 22; John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
Heller, “Poly (Otrho Esters)”; Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers; edited by Domb; et al; Hardwood Academic Press; 1997; pp. 99-118. |
Kemnitzer, “Degradable Polymers Derived From the Amino Acid L-Tyrosine”; 1997; pp. 251-272; edited by Domb, et. al., Hardwood Academic Press. |
Khoo, Axilif address spongy from the caudal approach. Minimally Invasive Correction of Grage I and II Isthmic Spondylolisthesis using AsiaLiF for L5/S1 Fusion, pp. 45-0123 Rev B Sep. 15, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/009,546, filed Dec. 28, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/140,926, filed Dec. 26, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/178,315, filed May 14, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110320000 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61385958 | Sep 2010 | US | |
61410177 | Nov 2010 | US | |
61358220 | Jun 2010 | US | |
61379194 | Sep 2010 | US | |
61397716 | Nov 2010 | US | |
61466302 | Mar 2011 | US |