Multi-segment ultrasound transducers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9852727
  • Patent Number
    9,852,727
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 28, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 26, 2017
    6 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed are systems and methods for focusing ultrasound transducers that include multiple separate, independently movable transducer segments.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates, generally, to systems and methods for ultrasound focusing. In particular, various embodiments are directed to focusing a multi-segment ultrasound transducer array utilizing, for example, magnetic-resonance acoustic radiation force imaging (MR-ARFI).


BACKGROUND

Focused ultrasound (i.e., acoustic waves having a frequency greater than about 20 kilohertz) can be used to image or therapeutically treat internal body tissues within a patient. For example, ultrasonic waves may be used to ablate tumors, eliminating the need for the patient to undergo invasive surgery. For this purpose, a piezo-ceramic transducer is placed externally to the patient, but in close proximity to the tissue to be ablated (“the target”). The transducer converts an electronic drive signal into mechanical vibrations, resulting in the emission of acoustic waves. The transducer may be shaped so that the waves converge in a focal zone. Alternatively or additionally, the transducer may be formed of a plurality of individually driven transducer elements whose phases can each be controlled independently from one another and, thus, can be set so as to result in constructive interference of the individual acoustic waves in the focal zone. Such a “phased-array” transducer facilitates steering the focal zone to different locations by adjusting the relative phases between the transducers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be utilized to visualize the focus and target in order to guide the ultrasound beam.


To minimize, for a given focus intensity, the intensity experienced by tissue regions surrounding the target, the ultrasound waves preferably come from multiple directions. This may require large transducer surfaces that surround the target as much as possible. Large-area transducers arrays may, however, be difficult to handle, and may complicate beam steering. Moreover, the placement of the transducer may be constrained by anatomical barriers, depending on the particular target location inside the body. For the treatment of different tissues and organs, differently shaped transducers may be desirable. Further, even if the location of the transducer with respect to the target is geometrically optimal, ultrasound waves coming from certain regions of the transducer surface may be blocked by strongly absorbing tissue, such as, e.g., bone, or other internal anatomical barriers. Accordingly, there is a need for focused ultrasound transducer arrays that are adjustable to various anatomical constraints.


SUMMARY

The present invention provides, in various embodiments, ultrasound transducer arrangements including a plurality of separate, independently movable segments, and systems and methods for calibrating and driving these segments collectively to generate a common, “global” focus. The segments may be placed around a target in a way that exploits acoustic windows, i.e., beam paths along which the acoustic waves can travel without undergoing significant absorption, reflection, or scattering. In some embodiments, the transducer segments are mechanically coupled, either loosely or strongly, which reduces the number of degrees of freedom of the relative motion. In other embodiments, the segments are mechanically uncoupled.


In typical embodiments, each segment contains a plurality (e.g., tens, hundreds, or thousands of) transducer elements. In operation, the relative phases and/or amplitudes of these elements may be adjusted to steer the ultrasound beam emanating from the respective transducer segment along a desired direction, and create a focus at a desired distance. The required relative phases and/or amplitudes may be computed from information about the geometry of the transducer segment, its location and orientation relative to the target, and relevant material properties (e.g., the speed of sound at the employed frequency) along the beam path (hereinafter collectively referred to as a “sonication model”). Alternatively, they may be determined experimentally, either in the treatment setup itself or in a calibration setup before integration of the segment into the transducer arrangement for treatment, through iterative measurements of the focus quality and phase/amplitude adjustments. In some embodiments, computations based on a sonciation model are advantageously combined with experimental feedback.


Once the segments have been individually focused (so that the outputs of their transducer elements converge at a common location), their respective foci may be brought to overlap. In some embodiments, focusing the individual beams at the target location may suffice to generate the desired global focus. In general, however, the individual foci will be at least slightly displaced from one another, resulting in a blurred global focus. To improve the focus quality, one or more segments may be physically moved to translate and/or rotate the beam, and/or phase shift gradients may be applied across the transducer elements to adjust the beam steering angle(s).


In addition to the co-location of the foci of the various transducer segments, a global focus generally requires that the various acoustic waves arrive (at least approximately) in phase at the center of the global focus. The total phase of an acoustic wave from an individual segment may be adjusted by shifting the phases of all its elements simultaneously by the same amount. The acoustic waves from the different transducer segments may be brought in phase by varying the total phase associated with one segment while keeping the total phases of the other segments constant, and observing the resulting variation in the focus intensity and quality. The phase difference between the variable and constant phases at which the focus intensity in the center is maximized corresponds to the amount by which the total phase of the segment under test should be adjusted to improve the global focus. This procedure may be carried out for all of the segments in turn to achieve constructive interference at the center of the global focus. To reduce the number of sonications needed for this adjustment procedure, the initial settings of the relative total phases of the transducer segments may be based on information, to the extent available, about the relative locations and orientations of the segments.


Various techniques, including, for example, thermal imaging and MR-ARFI, may be used to visualize the focus during the calibration procedure described above. Thermal imaging is not possible in all types of tissues; for instance, it does not work in fat tissue because the resonant frequency of fat tissue is largely independent of temperature in a temperature range suitable for imaging Also, thermal imaging is associated with a local rise in temperature that is desirably avoided in certain tissue types, e.g., in a blood clot, for medical reasons. Magnetic-resonance acoustic radiation force imaging, on the other hand, is applicable to all types of soft tissue. It involves magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of minute material displacements resulting from pressure associated with an acoustic wave. The displacement increases with the acoustic field intensity. Thus, by adjusting the locations, beam directions, and/or total phases of the transducer segments to increase the material displacement, the intensity at the focus and, consequently, the focus quality may be improved. Compared with thermal imaging, MR-ARFI provides sufficient signal strength and contrast at lower levels of energy deposited into the material. Therefore, MR-ARFI may be employed in many situations in which thermal imaging, due to its potential to damage tissue, would be precluded. Further, MR-ARFI may allow a greater number of measurements, and hence a better focus, before the accumulated energy deposit reaches the limit of what is physiologically tolerable.


In one aspect, various embodiments of the invention are directed to a method of focusing an ultrasound transducer arrangement including a plurality of separate, independently movable segments, in which each transducer segment, in turn, includes a plurality of transducer elements. The transducer segments may be mechanically uncoupled or mechanically coupled. Mechanical coupling between two or more segments may eliminate a degree of freedom of relative motion between the segments. The method includes performing the following steps for each of the plurality of transducer segments: (i) driving the segment so as to generate an ultrasound focus; (ii) measuring a total phase associated with the focus relative to a phase of a global focus; and (iii) determining whether the focus is in phase with the global focus and, if not, adjusting the total phase of the focus to a phase of the global focus.


Driving the segment may include setting relative phases between the transducer elements of that segment so as to generate the ultrasound focus. The relative phase settings may be based (at least in part) on a sonication model. Alternatively, the relative phase settings may be determined (at least in part) by (i) driving a selected element of the segment at a variable phase while driving the other elements at a constant phase, thereby varying an intensity of the focus; (ii) determining a phase difference, if any, between the constant and variable phases where the intensity is maximized; and (iii) if the phase difference is non-zero, adjusting the phase of the selected element accordingly. In some embodiments, such an experimental adjustment of the relative phases is combined with the use of a sonication model.


Measuring the total phase of the focus relative to the phase of the global focus may be accomplished by (i) driving the segment at a variable phase while driving the other segments at a constant phase, thereby varying an intensity of the global focus; (ii) determining a phase difference, if any, between the constant and variable phases where the intensity is maximized; and (iii) if the phase difference is non-zero, adjusting the total phase of the segment based thereon. Determining the phase difference may involve imaging the focus, e.g., using MR-ARFI. The total phase of the focus may be adjusted by applying phase shifts of equal magnitude to all of the transducer elements of the segment generating that focus. In some embodiments, the method further includes measuring a location of the focus associated with each segment relative to a location of the global focus, determining whether the focus is co-located with the global focus, and, if not, shifting the focus to the global focus.


In another aspect, a method, in accordance with various embodiments, for focusing an ultrasound transducer arrangement having multiple separate, independently movable segments (wherein each transducer segment again includes a plurality of transducer elements) includes driving each segment so as to generate an ultrasound focus; measuring a location of the respective focus relative to a location of a global focus; and determining whether the respective focus is co-located with the global focus and, if not, shifting it to the global focus.


Measuring the location of the focus relative to the global focus may include imaging the focus, e.g., using MR-ARFI or thermal imaging. Shifting the focus may be accomplished by physically moving the segment or, alternatively or additionally, by applying a phase gradient across the transducer elements of the segment.


In yet another aspect, various embodiments of the invention provide a system for focusing ultrasound which includes an ultrasound transducer arrangement having a plurality of separate, independently movable segments, each transducer segment including a phased array of transducer elements for generating an ultrasound focus; an MRI system for imaging the ultrasound foci associated with the segments; and a control facility in communication with the magnetic resonance imaging system and the ultrasound transducer arrangement. The control facility is configured to (i) drive each segment to generate the associated ultrasound focus, (ii) determine (based at least in part on an image of the ultrasound focus) whether the focus is co-located and in phase with a global focus, and, if the focus of an individual segment is not co-located with the global focus, (iii) adjust at least one of a position, a total phase, or a phase gradient of the segment so as to co-locate and bring the focus in phase with the global focus.


In some embodiments, the transducer segments are mechanically uncoupled. In other embodiments, the transducer segments are mechanically coupled. For example, the transducer segments may form a linkage mechanism with a single degree of freedom. The MRI system, ultrasound transducer arrangement, and control facility may be collectively configured to image the ultrasound foci by MR-ARFI.


In another aspect, the invention provides, in various embodiments, a method of treating a target using ultrasound. The method includes arranging a plurality of separate, independently movable transducer segments (each comprising a plurality of transducer elements) around the target; calibrating the arrangement of the transducer segments; and then simultaneously driving the transducer segments to focus ultrasound into the target, thereby treating the target. The transducer segments may be arranged so as to exploit acoustic windows. Calibrating the arrangement of transducer segments is accomplished by (i) driving each segment to generate an ultrasound focus, and (ii) imaging the ultrasound focus of each segment to determine whether it coincides with a global focus at the target and, if not, adjusting the segment to bring the ultrasound focus in coincidence with the global focus.


Determining whether the ultrasound focus of a particular segment coincides with the global focus may involve determining whether the ultrasound focus is co-located with the global focus and/or whether the ultrasound focus is in phase with the global focus. If the focus associated with a segment is not co-located with the global focus, a position or a phase gradient of the segment may be adjusted. If the focus associated with a segment is out of phase with the global focus, the total phase of the segment may be adjusted.


In a further aspect, certain embodiments of the invention are directed to a control system for operating an ultrasound system including an arrangement of separate, independently movable transducer segments (each transducer segment comprising a phased array of transducer elements for generating an ultrasound focus associated with the segment) used in conjunction with an MRI system. The control system includes circuitry for (i) driving each segment to generate an associated ultrasound focus, (ii) based at least in part on an image of the ultrasound focus, determining whether the focus is co-located and in phase with a global focus, and, if not, (iii) adjusting at least one of a position, a total phase, or a phase gradient of the segment so as to co-locate and bring the focus in phase with the global focus.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of the invention in conjunction with the drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing illustrating an MR-guided focused ultrasound system with a multi-segment ultrasound transducer in accordance with various embodiments;



FIGS. 2A-2C illustrate several MR-ARFI sequences in accordance with various embodiments;



FIG. 3A is an image of material displacements in an ultrasound focus region in accordance with some embodiments;



FIG. 3B is a graph illustrating material displacement in the focus center as a function of the phase of an individual transducer element, as it may be used in calibrations methods in accordance with various embodiments; and



FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating a method of focusing a multi-segment ultrasound transducer array in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 illustrates schematically an exemplary magnetic-resonance-guided focused ultrasound system 100 in accordance with various embodiments of the invention. The system includes several ultrasound transducer segments 102, which are arranged around the torso 104 of a patient and directed towards a target 106 in a region of interest (ROI) inside the patient, e.g., in the patient's liver. The segments 102 may each be affixed to a corresponding housing or support structure. Alternatively, the segments 102 may be mounted on a common housing that has loosely connected movable parts which allow the segments to be translated and/or rotated with respect to one another. In some embodiments, the relative motion between each pair of transducer elements has six degrees of freedom—i.e., three rotational and three translational degrees of freedom. In other embodiments, the relative motion between at least some of the transducers is partially constrained. For example, certain transducers used for the treatment of long bones have multiple segments that form a mechanical linkage or chain. The segments may be mechanically coupled by hinges, rivets, bearings, bolted joins, shafts, rollers, universal joints, or other means that eliminate one or more translational or rotational degrees of freedom. A chain of segments connected by hinges, for instances, forms a single-degree-of-freedom linkage mechanism. Mechanical couplings between segments may be rigid or flexible. Flexible couplings can be provided for a continuum of coupling strengths (approaching rigid couplings at the strong end), and may include elastic elements such as springs. Generally, flexible couplings allow some misalignment between the links.


Each transducer segment 102 may comprise a one- or two-dimensional array (i.e., a row or a matrix) of individually controllable transducer elements 108. In other embodiments, the transducer elements 108 may be arranged in a non-coordinated fashion, i.e., they need not be spaced regularly or arranged in a regular pattern. In still other embodiments, one or more of the segments each include only one transducer element 108. The segments may have a curved (e.g., spherical or parabolic) shape, as illustrated, or may include one or more planar or otherwise shaped sections. Their dimensions may vary, depending on the application, between millimeters and tens of centimeters. The transducer elements 108 may be piezoelectric ceramic elements. Piezo-composite materials, or generally any materials capable of converting electrical energy to acoustic energy, may also be used. To damp the mechanical coupling between the elements 108, they may be mounted on the housing(s) using silicone rubber or any other suitable damping material.


The transducer elements 108 are separately controllable, i.e., they are each capable of emitting ultrasound waves at amplitudes and/or phases that are independent of the amplitudes and/or phases of the other transducers. A control facility 110 serves to drive the transducer elements 108. The control facility 110 may include separate control modules for each of the transducer segments 102. For n transducer elements 108 of a segment 102, a control module within the control facility 110 may contain n control circuits each comprising an amplifier and a phase delay circuit, each control circuit driving one of the transducer elements. The control facility 110 may split a radio frequency (RF) input signal, typically in the range from 0.1 MHz to 4 MHz, to provide n channels for the n control circuit (and additional channels for the other transducer segments). The control module may be configured to drive the individual transducer elements 108 of one segment 102 at the same frequency, but at different phases and different amplitudes so that they collectively produce a focused ultrasound beam. The control facility 110 may also include, for each of the transducer segments 102, an additional amplifier and phase delay circuit, which may be used to adjust the total amplitude and phase of the respective segment.


The control facility 110 desirably provides computational functionality, which may be implemented in software, hardware, firmware, hardwiring, or any combination thereof, to compute the required phases and amplitudes for a desired focus location. The computations carried out in the control facility may be based on sonication models for the transducer segments and/or experimental feedback about the focus quality, as described further below. In general, the control facility may include several separable apparatus, such as a frequency generator, one or more beamformers containing the amplifier and phase delay circuitry for each control module, and a computer (e.g., a general-purpose computer) performing the computations and communicating the phases and amplitudes for the individual transducer elements 108 to the beamformer(s). Such systems are readily available or can be implemented without undue experimentation.


The MRgFUS system 100 further includes an MRI apparatus 112 in communication with the control facility 110. The apparatus 112 may include a cylindrical electromagnet 114, which generates a static magnetic field within a bore thereof. During medical procedures, the patient may be placed inside the bore on a movable support table, and positioned such that an imaging region encompassing the ROI (e.g., the patient's liver) falls within a region where the magnetic field is substantially uniform. The magnetic field strength within the uniform region is typically between about 1.5 and about 3.0 Tesla. The magnetic field causes hydrogen nuclei spins to align and precess about the general direction of the magnetic field. An RF transmitter coil 116 surrounding the imaging region emits RF pulses into the imaging region, causing some of the aligned spins to oscillate between a temporary high-energy non-aligned state and the aligned state. This oscillation induces RF response signals, called the MR echo or MR response signals, in a receiver coil, which may, but need not, be the transmitter coil 116. The MR response signals are amplified, conditioned, and digitized into raw data using an image processing system, and further transformed into arrays of image data by methods known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Based on the image data, the target 106 (e.g., a tumor) is identified. Further, in some embodiments, the position and/or orientation of the segments are determined from MRI markers in the image (e.g., generated by MR coils that are embedded in or affixed to the segments). The ultrasound transducer segments 102 are then each driven so as to focus ultrasound into (or near) the treatment region.


To align the foci generated by the various transducer segments 102 with one another and with the target 106, the foci may be visualized using one of a number of magnetic-resonance-based imaging techniques, such as, e.g., thermal MRI or MR-ARFI. Because MR-ARFI generally requires lower ultrasound energies during alignment and calibration procedures than other methods, and the ultrasound intensity preceding the actual treatment should be minimized to avoid damage to tissue outside the target, MR-ARFI is typically preferred. In MR-ARFI, a transducer is driven so as to focus an ultrasound wave pulse into the body at or near the target. The ultrasound wave exerts acoustic radiation pressure onto the material along its path. At the focus, where the waves converge, this pressure is highest, resulting in a temporary local displacement of the material in the longitudinal direction and/or in shear waves that propagate radially away from the focus. Thus, the ultrasound pressure creates a displacement field that directly reflects the acoustic field. The displacement field may be visualized by applying transient-motion or displacement-sensitizing magnetic field gradients to the imaging region by gradient coils, which are part of standard MRI systems and are typically located near the cylindrical electromagnet 114. When the ultrasound pulse is applied in the presence of such gradients, the resulting displacement is directly encoded into the phase of the MR response signal. For example, the gradient coils and transducer may be configured such that the ultrasound pulse pushes material near the focus towards regions of the magnetic field with higher field strengths. In response to the resulting change in the magnetic field, the phase of the MR response signal changes proportionally, thereby encoding in the signal the displacement caused by the ultrasound radiation pressure.


To achieve high image contrast, the ultrasound pulse, encoding gradients, and RF pulse are precisely timed with respect to each other according to a suitable displacement-encoding sequence. FIGS. 2A-2C illustrate five exemplary MR-ARFI sequences that may be used in embodiments of the invention. These sequence diagrams illustrate the order in which the displacement-encoding magnetic field gradients (thin solid lines), ultrasound pulses (dotted lines), and RF pulses (thick solid lines) appear in time. Three different field gradient sets are shown: two single lobes (a), repeated bipolars (b), and inverted bipolars (c). For gradient set (a), ultrasound may be applied during either the first or the second lobe. Similarly, for gradient set (c), ultrasound may be applied during the first or the second halves of the bipolars. In general, MR-ARFI sequences utilize magnetic field gradients that are synchronized with the ultrasound pulses. In preferred embodiments, a sequence like the repeated bipolar sequence (b) shown in FIG. 2B may be used. The imaging sequence may be programmed into the control facility 110. The control facility 110 may then send trigger signals to the ultrasound transducer modules and the MRI hardware to ensure correct timing between the signals.


An example of an MR-ARFI image of an ultrasound focus region is shown in FIG. 3A. As shown, the material displacement with respect to an equilibrium position varies between about −1 μm and 5 μm. In general, the stronger the acoustic field intensity, the greater will be the maximum displacement at the center of the focus. The acoustic field intensity, in turn, is maximized when the individually controlled portions of the transducer (i.e., the elements within a transducer segments and/or the various segments) emit acoustic waves that are all in phase at the focus position. If a transducer element is out of phase with respect to the others, the focus intensity in the center decreases. This relationship can be exploited to optimize the focus, and thus to map and adjust the transducer elements and/or segments, as detailed further below. Assuming, for example, that all but one of the transducer elements of a segment are properly configured, the correct phase of the last element can be determined by tuning the phase over a full cycle (e.g., between −π and +π), measuring for each phase the displacement in the focus center, and then setting the phase to the value corresponding to the maximum displacement. FIG. 3B depicts the results of such an adjustment procedure. In the illustrated example, the material displacement over the full phase cycle of one element varies between about 4.85 μm and about 5.4 μm. The maximum displacement occurs at about 0.12 rad. Consequently, the focus intensity and quality can be improved by introducing a phase shift of 0.12 rad for the tested transducer element.


In principle, it is possible to adjust the focus of a multi-segment transducer by adjusting each individual transducer element 108, without regard to the arrangement of the elements 108 in multiple segments 102. In practice, however, this procedure may take an undesirably long time, and may not be necessary. Since the transducer elements 108 within one segment are rigidly connected with each other, a-priori knowledge of the surface of that transducer segment may suffice to create a focus of sufficient quality with that segment. Such a-priori knowledge may be obtained in a calibration procedure outside the body, e.g., using a phantom. Suitable calibration procedures are described, for example, in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/251,450, filed Oct. 14, 2009, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.


In brief, mapping of the full transducer array of a segment may be accomplished by varying and adjusting the phase of each element, one at a time, while driving the remaining elements at constant phase, and monitoring the focus quality, e.g., using MR-ARFI. Typically, after each element has been mapped independently, the focus quality has significantly improved. Since the necessary phase adjustments of the transducer elements are all interrelated, however, the focus may not yet be optimal after one iteration. Therefore, in some embodiments, the procedure may be repeated iteratively. With each iteration, the phase adjustments made to maximize the displacement in the focus will, generally, decrease. Thus, a termination condition may be defined by setting a threshold value for phase adjustments, below which further adjustments are deemed immaterial or not clinically necessary. The number of iterations required to reach the termination condition may depend on the order in which the transducer elements are mapped. A mathematical algorithm, for example a “greedy algorithm” as known to persons of skill in the art, may be used to select a mapping order that results in fast convergence of the phase settings.


When a transducer segment calibrated with a phantom is placed into a treatment setup (such as the one shown in FIG. 1), the ultrasound beam may experience aberration due to its passage through tissue that differs from the phantom material. While such aberration may be significant for bones, it is typically less significant, or even negligible, for soft tissues, such as the breast, liver, or prostate. Utilizing a transducer comprising multiple independently movable segments facilitates, in many applications, arrangements in which the beam paths only go through soft tissues. Thus, to achieve the desired global focus, the foci produced by the various segments often need only be properly aligned and phase-adjusted.


In some embodiments, fine adjustments to the relative phases (and, in some cases, amplitudes) between transducer elements of a pre-calibrated transducer segment are desired after integration of the segment into the treatment setup. Further, in certain embodiments, the individual transducer segments are mapped directly in the treatment setup. In both cases, phase adjustments may be based on geometric and/or material parameters of a sonication model (including, e.g., information about the relative arrangement of the segment and target, and/or acoustic material parameters of the tissue(s) between the segment and target), iterative experimental feedback, or a combination of both. For example, transducer elements within a segment may be grouped according to a-priori knowledge about the types and acoustic properties of tissues along the respective acoustic wave paths to the target, and the relative phases between groups of elements may then be adjusted using MR-ARFI. Experimental feedback may also be used to ascertain an unknown parameter of a sonciation model. Further detail about the calculation of relative phases (and, optionally, amplitudes) based on a sonication model is described, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/425,698, filed on Apr. 17, 2009, and further detail about the combination of sonication-model-based computations and measurements of focus quality to efficiently adjust the relative phases of the transducer elements is described in a U.S. patent application entitled, “Efficient Ultrasound Focusing,” filed on even date herewith. Both applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.


A-priori knowledge of the tissues may be obtained, for example, from measurements of the acoustic material properties of the tissues. Information about the location and/or orientation of the segment relative to the target may be known from the design of the treatment setup, and/or measured with sensors, such as MR tracking coils or position sensors (e.g., tilt indicators, ultrasound encoders, or optical encoders) embedded in the segment. Further, if multiple segments are mechanically linked, information about the location and/or orientation of one segment may provide information about the location and/or orientation of another segment. For example, the position of one segment of a linkage mechanism, together with the relative orientations of the joints between the segments, suffices to determine the positions of the other transducer segments, reducing the number of sensors needed.



FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary method for focusing a multi-segment transducer in accordance with various embodiments. In a first step 400, the transducer segments (which may have been calibrated outside the treatment setup) are placed around a target, typically inside an imaging apparatus. The locations of the various segments may be chosen to exploit acoustic windows, e.g., such that absorption or scattering of ultrasound between the segments and the target is minimized. Each segment is then driven to produce an ultrasound focus, and any adjustments to the transducer elements that may be desirable to improve the quality or correct the location of each individual focus is made (step 402). Then, two or more segments are driven simultaneously, and the resulting ultrasound foci are imaged (step 404), e.g., using MR-ARFI, to determine whether they are co-located. If a focus of one of the segments is displaced from the other foci (and/or the target), that segment is physically moved, or the steering of its beam is electronically adjusted, to correct for the displacement. Typically, physical translation of the transducer segment is used first to bring the focus approximately in the right location (step 406), and fine-tuning of the location is subsequently accomplished by adjusting the relative phases of the transducer elements (step 408). For example, to translate the beam laterally while maintaining the focus quality, a linear phase-gradient shift may be applied to the transducer array. The segments may generally be aligned in any order. For example, two foci may first be brought to overlap, then a third focus generated by a third segment may be added and aligned with the other two, and so on. Alternatively, a reference focus may be chosen, and each of the other foci may be co-located with the reference focus individually. The foci may also be generated simultaneously at the outside, and iteratively be aligned with each other.


Once the foci are co-located in a global focus, their total phases are adjusted so that the waves from different transducer segments arrive in phase at a center point or region of the focus. The initial total phases of the transducers may (but need not) be based on information about the relative positions and/or orientations of the transducer segments (which may be available, in particular, for mechanically coupled segments). When all the foci are in phase with each other, the global focus will have an intensity profile in which the intensity decreases monotonously with the distance from a center. Otherwise, when some of the foci are out of phase, a different intensity profile may be observed. For example, assuming that each segment contributes the same amount of energy to the focal region, if half of the segments are phase-shifted by π with respect to the other half, the waves interfere destructively at the center, but form interference fringes (e.g., a ring pattern) in the surrounding region. For the purpose of bringing the ultrasound foci in phase, one transducer segment may be selected (step 410), and the total phase of that segment may be varied (step 412) while the phases of the other segments are held constant. Simultaneously with the phase variation, the global focus may be imaged (step 414), again using MR-ARFI, for example. The intensity at the center of the global focus (and thus, in MR-ARFI, the tissue displacement) will be maximized when the ultrasound wave of the segment under test is in phase with the overall ultrasound field generated by the other segments. Therefore, the total phase of the tested segment at which the intensity is maximized constitutes the phase shift by which the total phase is subsequently adjusted (step 416). The adjustment step is repeated for each transducer segment until all the segments produce ultrasound foci that are in phase with each other. Alternatively, the phase shifts may first be determined for all the segments without adjustments being made, and subsequently, all the phase adjustments may be made at once. Once the transducer arrangement has been calibrated, i.e., the individual foci have been co-located in brought in phase, the transducer segments may be driven simultaneously to treat the target.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific details, it is not intended that such details should be regarded as limitations upon the scope of the invention, except as and to the extent that they are included in the accompanying claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of focusing an ultrasound transducer arrangement comprising a plurality of separate, spaced-apart, independently movable segments, each transducer segment comprising a plurality of individually controllable transducer elements and each transducer element comprising a plurality of piezoelectric elements, the method comprising: (a) for each of the plurality of transducer segments, adjusting relative phases of the transducer elements within the segment so as to create a focus associated with the segment; and(b) following step (a), bringing the foci associated with the segments in phase by measuring, for each segment, a total phase associated with the focus relative to a phase of a global focus; and(c) determining whether the focus is in phase with the global focus and, if not, adjusting the total phase of the focus to a phase of the global focus.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein measuring the total phase of the focus relative to the phase of the global focus comprises (i) driving the segment at a variable total phase while driving the other segments at a constant total phase, thereby varying an intensity of the global focus; (ii) determining a phase difference, if any, between the constant and variable total phases where the intensity is maximized; and (iii) if the phase difference is non-zero, adjusting the total phase of the segment based thereon.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein determining the phase difference comprises imaging the focus.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 wherein imaging the focus is accomplished using magnetic-resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein adjusting the total phase of the focus comprises applying phase shifts of equal magnitude to all of the transducer elements of the segment generating the focus.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 further comprising measuring a location of the focus relative to a location of the global focus, determining whether the focus is co-located with the global focus, and, if not, shifting the focus to the global focus.
  • 7. A method of focusing an ultrasound transducer arrangement comprising a plurality of separate, spaced-apart, independently movable segments, each transducer segment comprising a plurality of individually controllable transducer elements and each transducer element comprising a plurality of piezoelectric elements, the method comprising: (a) for each of the plurality of transducer segments, adjusting relative phases of the transducer elements within the segment so as to create a focus associated with the segment; and(b) following step (a), bringing the foci associated with the segments to overlap by measuring, for each segment, a location of the focus relative to a location of a global focus; and(c) determining whether the focus is co-located with the global focus and, if not, shifting the focus to the global focus.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein measuring the location of the focus relative to the global focus comprises imaging the focus.
  • 9. The method of claim 8 wherein imaging the focus is accomplished using thermal imaging.
  • 10. The method of claim 7 wherein shifting the focus comprises physically moving the segment.
  • 11. The method of claim 7 wherein shifting the focus comprises applying a phase gradient across the transducer elements of the segment.
  • 12. A system for focusing ultrasound, the system comprising: an ultrasound transducer arrangement comprising a plurality of separate, spaced-apart, independently movable segments, each transducer segment comprising a phased array of individually controllable transducer elements and each transducer element comprising a plurality of piezoelectric elements for generating an ultrasound focus associated therewith;a magnetic resonance imaging system for imaging the ultrasound foci associated with the segments; andin communication with the magnetic resonance imaging system and the ultrasound transducer arrangement, a control facility configured to, for each segment, (i) adjust relative phases of the transducer elements within the segment so as to create a focus associated with the segment, (ii) following step (i), based at least in part on an image of the ultrasound focus, determine whether the focus is co-located and in phase with a global focus, and, if not, (iii) adjust at least one of a position, a total phase, or a phase gradient of the segment so as to co-locate and bring the focus in phase with the global focus.
  • 13. The system of claim 12 wherein the transducer segments are mechanically uncoupled.
  • 14. The system of claim 12 wherein the transducer segments are mechanically coupled.
  • 15. The system of claim 14 wherein the transducer segments form a linkage mechanism with a single degree of freedom.
  • 16. The system of claim 12 wherein the magnetic resonance imaging system, ultrasound transducer arrangement, and control facility are collectively configured to image the ultrasound foci using magnetic-resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.
  • 17. A method of treating a target using ultrasound, the method comprising: arranging a plurality of separate, spaced-apart independently movable transducer segments, each comprising a plurality of individually controllable transducer elements and each transducer element comprising a plurality of piezoelectric elements, around the target;calibrating the arrangement of the transducer segments by (i) adjusting relative phases of the transducer elements within each segment so as to generate an ultrasound focus associated with the segment, (ii) following step (i), imaging the ultrasound focus of each segment to determine whether it coincides with a global focus at the target and, if not, (iii) adjusting the segment to bring the ultrasound focus in coincidence with the global focus; andsimultaneously driving the transducer segments to focus ultrasound into the target, thereby treating the target.
  • 18. The method of claim 17 wherein determining whether the ultrasound focus coincides with the global focus comprises determining whether the ultrasound focus is co-located with the global focus.
  • 19. The method of claim 17 wherein determining whether the ultrasound focus coincides with the global focus comprises determining whether the ultrasound focus is in phase with the global focus.
  • 20. A control system for operating an ultrasound system used in conjunction with a magnetic resonance imaging system, the ultrasound system comprising an arrangement of separate, spaced-apart, independently movable transducer segments, each transducer segment comprising a phased array of individually controllable transducer elements and each transducer element comprising a plurality of piezoelectric elements, for generating an ultrasound focus associated therewith, the control system comprising circuitry for (i) adjusting relative phases of the transducer elements within each segment to generate an associated ultrasound focus, (ii) following step (i), based at least in part on an image of the ultrasound focus, determining whether the focus is collocated and in phase with a global focus, and, if not, (iii) adjusting at least one of a position, a total phase, or a phase gradient of the segment so as to co-locate and bring the focus in phase with the global focus.
US Referenced Citations (351)
Number Name Date Kind
2795709 Camp Jun 1957 A
3142035 Harris Jul 1964 A
3559159 Harms et al. Jan 1971 A
3942150 Booth et al. Mar 1976 A
3974475 Burckhardt et al. Aug 1976 A
3992693 Martin et al. Nov 1976 A
4000493 Spaulding et al. Dec 1976 A
4052723 Miller Oct 1977 A
4074564 Anderson Feb 1978 A
4206653 Lemay Jun 1980 A
4211132 Nichols, III et al. Jul 1980 A
4221132 Poole Sep 1980 A
4307613 Fox Dec 1981 A
4339952 Foster Jul 1982 A
4441486 Pounds Apr 1984 A
4454597 Sullivan Jun 1984 A
4478083 Hassler et al. Oct 1984 A
4505156 Questo Mar 1985 A
4526168 Hassler et al. Jul 1985 A
4537074 Dietz Aug 1985 A
4549533 Cain et al. Oct 1985 A
4554925 Young Nov 1985 A
4586512 Do-huu et al. May 1986 A
4616231 Autrey et al. Oct 1986 A
4636964 Jacobs et al. Jan 1987 A
4646756 Watmough et al. Mar 1987 A
4647808 Shibuya Mar 1987 A
4662222 Johnson May 1987 A
4757820 Itoh Jul 1988 A
4817614 Hassler et al. Apr 1989 A
4823053 Mccracken et al. Apr 1989 A
4858597 Kurtze et al. Aug 1989 A
4858613 Fry et al. Aug 1989 A
4865042 Umemura et al. Sep 1989 A
4886491 Parisi et al. Dec 1989 A
4888746 Wurster et al. Dec 1989 A
4889122 Watmough et al. Dec 1989 A
4893284 Magrane Jan 1990 A
4893624 Lele Jan 1990 A
4937767 Reuschel et al. Jun 1990 A
4938217 Lele Jul 1990 A
4957099 Hassler Sep 1990 A
5015929 Cathignol et al. May 1991 A
5143063 Fellner Sep 1992 A
5165412 Okazaki Nov 1992 A
5172343 O'donnell Dec 1992 A
5197475 Antich et al. Mar 1993 A
5209221 Riedlinger May 1993 A
5211160 Talish et al. May 1993 A
5247935 Cline et al. Sep 1993 A
5266863 Nonami et al. Nov 1993 A
5267221 Miller et al. Nov 1993 A
5269307 Fife et al. Dec 1993 A
5271400 Dumoulin et al. Dec 1993 A
5275165 Ettinger et al. Jan 1994 A
5291890 Cline et al. Mar 1994 A
5305737 Vago Apr 1994 A
5307812 Hardy et al. May 1994 A
5307816 Hashimoto et al. May 1994 A
5318025 Dumoulin et al. Jun 1994 A
5323779 Hardy et al. Jun 1994 A
5327884 Hardy et al. Jul 1994 A
5329930 Thomas, III et al. Jul 1994 A
5368031 Cline et al. Nov 1994 A
5368032 Cline et al. Nov 1994 A
5379642 Reckwerdt et al. Jan 1995 A
5388461 Rigby Feb 1995 A
5391140 Schaetzle et al. Feb 1995 A
5413550 Castel May 1995 A
5419761 Narayanan et al. May 1995 A
5435312 Spivey et al. Jul 1995 A
5443068 Cline et al. Aug 1995 A
5474071 Chapelon et al. Dec 1995 A
5477736 Lorraine Dec 1995 A
5485839 Aida et al. Jan 1996 A
5490512 Kwon et al. Feb 1996 A
5490840 Uzgiris et al. Feb 1996 A
5507790 Weiss Apr 1996 A
5514086 Parisi et al. May 1996 A
5520186 Deitrich May 1996 A
5520188 Hennige et al. May 1996 A
5520612 Winder et al. May 1996 A
5526814 Cline et al. Jun 1996 A
5527273 Manna et al. Jun 1996 A
5546360 Deegan Aug 1996 A
5549638 Burdette Aug 1996 A
5553618 Suzuki et al. Sep 1996 A
5573497 Chapelon Nov 1996 A
5582578 Zhong et al. Dec 1996 A
5590653 Aida et al. Jan 1997 A
5590657 Cain et al. Jan 1997 A
5601526 Chapelon et al. Feb 1997 A
5605154 Ries et al. Feb 1997 A
5606971 Sarvazyan Mar 1997 A
5617371 Williams Apr 1997 A
5617857 Chader et al. Apr 1997 A
5643179 Fujimoto Jul 1997 A
5662170 Donovan et al. Sep 1997 A
5665054 Dory Sep 1997 A
5666954 Chapelon et al. Sep 1997 A
5676673 Ferre et al. Oct 1997 A
5687729 Schaetzle Nov 1997 A
5694936 Fujimoto et al. Dec 1997 A
5711300 Schneider et al. Jan 1998 A
5718226 Riza Feb 1998 A
5722411 Suzuki et al. Mar 1998 A
5725482 Bishop Mar 1998 A
5728062 Brisken Mar 1998 A
5739625 Falcus Apr 1998 A
5743863 Chapelon Apr 1998 A
5752515 Jolesz et al. May 1998 A
5759162 Oppelt et al. Jun 1998 A
5762616 Talish Jun 1998 A
5769790 Watkins et al. Jun 1998 A
5769879 Richards et al. Jun 1998 A
5784336 Gopinathan et al. Jul 1998 A
5810008 Dekel et al. Sep 1998 A
5810731 Sarvazyan et al. Sep 1998 A
5817021 Reichenberger Oct 1998 A
5817036 Anthony et al. Oct 1998 A
5823990 Henley Oct 1998 A
5827204 Grandia et al. Oct 1998 A
5873845 Cline et al. Feb 1999 A
5884631 Silberg Mar 1999 A
5885211 Eppstein et al. Mar 1999 A
5891040 Grenon et al. Apr 1999 A
5897495 Aida et al. Apr 1999 A
5904659 Duarte et al. May 1999 A
5922962 Ishrak et al. Jul 1999 A
5938600 Van Vaals et al. Aug 1999 A
5938608 Bieger et al. Aug 1999 A
5947900 Derbyshire et al. Sep 1999 A
5984881 Ishibashi et al. Nov 1999 A
6004269 Crowley et al. Dec 1999 A
6007499 Martin et al. Dec 1999 A
6013048 Podany et al. Jan 2000 A
6023636 Wendt et al. Feb 2000 A
6032675 Rubinsky Mar 2000 A
6033375 Brumbach Mar 2000 A
6036644 Schutt Mar 2000 A
6039048 Silberg Mar 2000 A
6042556 Beach et al. Mar 2000 A
6045777 Church et al. Apr 2000 A
6071239 Cribbs et al. Jun 2000 A
6088295 Altes Jul 2000 A
6106511 Jensen Aug 2000 A
6113558 Rosenschein et al. Sep 2000 A
6113559 Klopotek Sep 2000 A
6128522 Acker et al. Oct 2000 A
6128958 Cain Oct 2000 A
6135960 Holmberg Oct 2000 A
6135971 Hutchinson et al. Oct 2000 A
6142939 Eppstein et al. Nov 2000 A
6156549 Drewes et al. Dec 2000 A
6193659 Ramamurthy et al. Feb 2001 B1
6217530 Martin et al. Apr 2001 B1
6242915 Hurd Jun 2001 B1
6246895 Plewes Jun 2001 B1
6246896 Dumoulin et al. Jun 2001 B1
6263230 Haynor et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267734 Ishibashi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6289233 Dumoulin et al. Sep 2001 B1
6309355 Cain et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317619 Boernert et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322527 Talish Nov 2001 B1
6334846 Ishibashi et al. Jan 2002 B1
6350245 Cimino Feb 2002 B1
6374132 Acker et al. Apr 2002 B1
6392330 Zloter et al. May 2002 B1
6397094 Ludeke et al. May 2002 B1
6413216 Cain et al. Jul 2002 B1
6419648 Vitek et al. Jul 2002 B1
6424597 Bolomey et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425867 Vaezy et al. Jul 2002 B1
6428477 Mason Aug 2002 B1
6428532 Doukas et al. Aug 2002 B1
6433464 Jones Aug 2002 B2
6461314 Pant et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475150 Haddad Nov 2002 B2
6478739 Hong Nov 2002 B1
6503204 Sumanaweera et al. Jan 2003 B1
6506154 Ezion et al. Jan 2003 B1
6506171 Vitek et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508774 Acker et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511064 Phinney et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511428 Azuma et al. Jan 2003 B1
6522142 Freundlich Feb 2003 B1
6523272 Morales Feb 2003 B1
6524251 Rabiner et al. Feb 2003 B2
6543272 Vitek Apr 2003 B1
6554826 Deardorff Apr 2003 B1
6559644 Froundlich et al. May 2003 B2
6566878 Komura et al. May 2003 B1
6582381 Yehezkeli et al. Jun 2003 B1
6589174 Chopra et al. Jul 2003 B1
6599256 Acker et al. Jul 2003 B1
6612988 Maor et al. Sep 2003 B2
6613004 Vitek et al. Sep 2003 B1
6613005 Friedman et al. Sep 2003 B1
6618608 Watkins et al. Sep 2003 B1
6618620 Freundlich et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626854 Friedman et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626855 Weng et al. Sep 2003 B1
6629929 Jago et al. Oct 2003 B1
6645162 Friedman et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652461 Levkovitz Nov 2003 B1
6666833 Friedman et al. Dec 2003 B1
6676601 Lacoste et al. Jan 2004 B1
6676602 Barnes et al. Jan 2004 B1
6679855 Horn et al. Jan 2004 B2
6705994 Vortman et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719694 Weng et al. Apr 2004 B2
6733450 Alexandrov et al. May 2004 B1
6735461 Vitek et al. May 2004 B2
6761691 Tsuzuki Jul 2004 B2
6770031 Hynynen et al. Aug 2004 B2
6770039 Zhong et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788619 Calvert Sep 2004 B2
6790180 Vitek Sep 2004 B2
6805129 Pless et al. Oct 2004 B1
6824516 Batten et al. Nov 2004 B2
6936046 Hissong et al. Aug 2005 B2
6951540 Ebbini et al. Oct 2005 B2
6961606 DeSilets et al. Nov 2005 B2
7001379 Behl et al. Feb 2006 B2
7077820 Kadziauskas et al. Jul 2006 B1
7094205 Marmarelis Aug 2006 B2
7128711 Medan et al. Oct 2006 B2
7155271 Halperin et al. Dec 2006 B2
7175596 Vitek et al. Feb 2007 B2
7175599 Hynynen et al. Feb 2007 B2
7264592 Shehada Sep 2007 B2
7264597 Cathignol Sep 2007 B2
7267650 Chow et al. Sep 2007 B2
7344509 Hynynen et al. Mar 2008 B2
7377900 Vitek et al. May 2008 B2
7429248 Winder et al. Sep 2008 B1
7452357 Vlegele et al. Nov 2008 B2
7505805 Kuroda Mar 2009 B2
7505808 Anderson et al. Mar 2009 B2
7507213 Schultheiss et al. Mar 2009 B2
7510536 Foley et al. Mar 2009 B2
7511501 Wexler Mar 2009 B2
7535794 Prus et al. May 2009 B2
7553284 Vaitekunas Jun 2009 B2
7603162 Danz et al. Oct 2009 B2
7611462 Vortman et al. Nov 2009 B2
7652410 Prus Jan 2010 B2
7699780 Vitek et al. Apr 2010 B2
7819805 Davies et al. Oct 2010 B2
8002706 Vortman et al. Aug 2011 B2
8057408 Cain et al. Nov 2011 B2
8075488 Burton Dec 2011 B2
8088067 Vortman et al. Jan 2012 B2
8409099 Vitek et al. Apr 2013 B2
8425424 Zadicario et al. Apr 2013 B2
8608672 Vortman et al. Dec 2013 B2
8617073 Prus et al. Dec 2013 B2
8661873 Medan et al. Mar 2014 B2
20010031922 Weng et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020016557 Duarte et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020035779 Krieg et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020082528 Friedman et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082589 Friedman et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020095087 Mourad et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020111552 Maor et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020151790 Abend Oct 2002 A1
20020161300 Hoff et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020188229 Ryaby Dec 2002 A1
20030004439 Pant et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030060820 Maguire et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030187371 Vortman et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040030251 Ebbini et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040059265 Candy et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040068186 Ishida et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040082868 Campbell et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040116809 Chow et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122316 Satoh Jun 2004 A1
20040122323 Vortman et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040143187 Biagi et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040147919 Behl et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040210134 Hynynen et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210135 Hynynen et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040236253 Vortman et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040236523 Taylor Nov 2004 A1
20040267126 Takeuchi Dec 2004 A1
20050033201 Takahashi et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050096542 Weng et al. May 2005 A1
20050131301 Peszynski et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050154304 Robinson Jul 2005 A1
20050199058 Danz et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203444 Schonenberger et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050240126 Foley et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251046 Yamamoto et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060052661 Gannot et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060052701 Carter et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060052706 Hynynen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058671 Vitek et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058678 Vitek et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060106300 Seppenwoolde et al. May 2006 A1
20060173307 Amara et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060173321 Kubota et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060173385 Lidgren et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060184034 Haim et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060184069 Vaitekunas Aug 2006 A1
20060206105 Chopra et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060229594 Francischelli et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235302 Grossman et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070016039 Vortman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070055140 Kuroda Mar 2007 A1
20070066897 Sekins et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073135 Lee et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070098232 Matula et al. May 2007 A1
20070167781 Vortman et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167798 Cai et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070197918 Vitek et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070219470 Talish et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070239062 Chopra et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070265560 Soltani et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276237 Li Nov 2007 A1
20080027342 Rouw et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080030104 Prus Feb 2008 A1
20080031090 Prus et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080033278 Assif Feb 2008 A1
20080082026 Schmidt et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103558 Wenzel et al. May 2008 A1
20080108900 Lee et al. May 2008 A1
20080125660 Yao et al. May 2008 A1
20080183077 Moreau-Gobard et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080228081 Becker et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080312562 Routh et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090088623 Vortman et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093721 Katsuyama Apr 2009 A1
20090096450 Roland Apr 2009 A1
20090118619 Oshiki May 2009 A1
20100030076 Vortman et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100056962 Vortman et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100125193 Zadicario May 2010 A1
20100179425 Zadicario Jul 2010 A1
20100268088 Prus et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274130 Anand et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100318002 Prus et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110066032 Vitek et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110094288 Medan et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110130663 Raju et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110137147 Skliar et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110251527 Kushculey et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110270136 Vitek et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120083695 Napolitano et al. Apr 2012 A1
20130077441 Ramamurthy et al. Mar 2013 A1
20140112095 Medan et al. Apr 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (85)
Number Date Country
1744861 Mar 2006 CN
1981708 Jun 2007 CN
4345308 Feb 2001 DE
10102317 Aug 2002 DE
0031614 Jul 1981 EP
151073 Aug 1985 EP
174920 Mar 1986 EP
272347 Jun 1988 EP
0320303 Jun 1989 EP
450334 Oct 1991 EP
462311 Dec 1991 EP
467690 Jan 1992 EP
0558029 Sep 1993 EP
627206 Dec 1994 EP
734742 Oct 1996 EP
1132054 Sep 2001 EP
1582886 Oct 2005 EP
1591073 Nov 2005 EP
1774920 Apr 2007 EP
1790384 May 2007 EP
1936404 Jun 2008 EP
2692999 Dec 1993 FR
2806611 Sep 2001 FR
2019565 Oct 1979 GB
5-92008 Apr 1993 JP
7-184907 Jul 1995 JP
7-231895 Sep 1995 JP
7-313518 Dec 1995 JP
11313833 Nov 1999 JP
00166940 Jun 2000 JP
01516075 Sep 2001 JP
02530145 Sep 2002 JP
2006-503653 Feb 2006 JP
WO-9100059 Jan 1991 WO
9115999 Oct 1991 WO
9119332 Dec 1991 WO
9315415 Aug 1993 WO
WO-95014505 Jun 1995 WO
9717018 May 1997 WO
WO-9852465 Nov 1998 WO
WO-0031614 Jun 2000 WO
0078232 Dec 2000 WO
0143640 Jun 2001 WO
0159337 Aug 2001 WO
WO-0158337 Aug 2001 WO
WO-0166189 Sep 2001 WO
0180708 Nov 2001 WO
WO-0180709 Nov 2001 WO
0180708 Mar 2002 WO
WO-0243805 Jun 2002 WO
WO-0244753 Jun 2002 WO
WO-0258791 Aug 2002 WO
WO-03013654 Feb 2003 WO
03070105 Aug 2003 WO
WO-03097162 Nov 2003 WO
WO-03098232 Nov 2003 WO
2004021044 Mar 2004 WO
2004066856 Aug 2004 WO
WO-2004093686 Nov 2004 WO
2005038745 Apr 2005 WO
WO-200558029 Jun 2005 WO
WO-2006018837 Feb 2006 WO
WO-2006021851 Mar 2006 WO
WO-2006025001 Mar 2006 WO
WO-2006087649 Aug 2006 WO
WO-2006119572 Nov 2006 WO
WO-2007051066 May 2007 WO
WO-2007073551 Jun 2007 WO
2007093998 Aug 2007 WO
2008015523 Feb 2008 WO
WO-2008039449 Apr 2008 WO
WO-2008050278 May 2008 WO
WO-200875203 Jun 2008 WO
WO-2008119054 Oct 2008 WO
WO-2009055587 Apr 2009 WO
2009085466 Jul 2009 WO
WO-2009081339 Jul 2009 WO
WO-2009094554 Jul 2009 WO
WO-2010058292 May 2010 WO
WO-2010082135 Jul 2010 WO
WO-2010119340 Oct 2010 WO
WO-2010143072 Dec 2010 WO
WO-2011013001 Feb 2011 WO
WO-2011024074 Mar 2011 WO
WO-2011045669 Apr 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (90)
Entry
Fronheiser et al., “3D Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Imaging Using a 2D Matrix Array: Feasibility Study,” Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 1144-1147 (Oct. 2006).
Wu et al., “MRImaging of Shear Waves Generated by Focused Ultrasound,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 43, pp. 111-115 (2000).
Heikkila et al., “Simulations of Lesion Detection Using a Combined Phased Array LHMI-Technique,”Ultrasonics, IPC Science and Technology Press Ltd., vol. 48, No. 6-7, pp. 568-573 (Nov. 2008).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 19, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/IB2011/001293 (13 pages).
McGough et al., “Direct Computation of Ultrasound Phased-Array Driving Signals from a Specified Temperature Distribution for Hyperthermia,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 39, No. 8, pp. 825-835 (Aug. 1992).
Botros et al., “A hybrid computational model for ultrasound phased-array heating in presence of strongly scattering obstacles,” IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., vol. 44, No. 11, pp. 1039-1050 (Nov. 1997).
Cain et al., “Concentric-ring and Sector-vortex Phased-array Applicators for Ultrasound Hperthermia,” IEEE Trans. on Microwave Theory & Techniques, vol. MTT-34, No. 5, pp. 542-551 (May 1986).
Chen et al., “MR Acoustic Radiation Force Imaging: Comparison of Encoding Gradients.”
Cline et al., “Focused US system for MR imaging-guide tumor ablation,” Radiology, v. 194, No. 3, pp. 731-738 (Mar. 1995).
Cline et al., “MR Temperature mapping of focused ultrasound surgery,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 628-636 (1994).
Cline et al., “Simultaneous magnetic resonance phase and magnitude temperature maps in muscle,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 309-315 (Mar. 1996).
Daum et al., “Design and evaluation of a feedback based phased array system for ultrasound surgery,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Control, vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 431-434 (1998).
de Senneville et al., “Real-time adaptive methods for treatment of mobile organs by MRI-controlled high-intensity focussed Ultrasound,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 57:319-330 (2007).
Fjield et al, “The Combined Concentric-ring and Sector-vortex Phased Array for MRI Guided Ultrasound Surgery,” IEEE Trans. on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Freq. Cont., vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 1157-1167 (Sep. 1997).
Herbert et al., “Energy-based adaptive focusing of waves: application to ultrasonic transcranial therapy,” 8th Intl. Symp. on Therapeutic Ultrasound.
Huber et al., “A New Noninvasive Approach in Breast Cancer Therapy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focussed Ultrasound Surgery,” Cancer Research 61, 8441-8447 (Dec. 2001).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2004/001512, dated Dec. 8, 2005.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2004/001498, dated Aug. 31, 2004.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2005/002273, dated Dec. 20, 2005.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2005/002413, dated Nov. 22, 2005.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2006/001641, dated Sep. 25, 2006.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2006/003300, dated Feb. 14, 2008.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2007/001079, dated Dec. 10, 2007.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2007/002134, dated Dec. 13, 2007.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2007/002140, dated Dec. 29, 2008.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2008/003069, dated Apr. 27, 2009.
Jolesz et al., “Integration of interventional MRI with computer-assisted surgery,” J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 12:69-77 (2001).
Kohler et al., “Volumetric HIFU Ablation guided by multiplane MRI thermometry,” 8th Intl. Symp. on Therapeutic Ultrasound, edited by E.S. Ebbini, U. of Minn. (Sep. 2009).
Kowalski et al., “Optimization of electromagnetic phased-arrays for hyperthermia via magnetic resonance temperature estimation,” IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., vol. 49, No. 11, pp. 1229-1241 (Nov. 2002).
Maxwell et al., “Noninvasive thrombolysis using pulsed ultrasound cavitation therapy—Histotripsy,” Abstract, U.S. Natl. Lib. of Med., NIH, Ultrasound Med. Biol. (Oct. 23, 2009).
McDannold et al., “MRI evaluation of thermal ablation of tumors and focused ultrasounds,” JMRI vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 91-100 (1998).
McDannold et al., “Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging,” Med. Phys. vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 3748-3758 (Aug. 2008).
Medel et al., “Sonothrombolysis: An emerging modality for the management of stroke,” Neurosurgery, vol. 65, No. 5, pp. 979-993.
Mougenot et al., “MR monitoring of the near-field HIFU heating,” 8th Intl. Symp. on Therapeutic Ultrasound, edited by E.S. Ebbini, U. of Minn. (Sep. 2009).
Partial International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2007/001079, dated Sep. 25, 2007.
Vimeux et al., “Real-time control of focused ultrasound heating based on rapid MR thermometry,” Investig. Radiology, vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 190-193.
Vykhodtseva et al., “MRI detection of the thermal effects of focused ultrasound on the brain,” Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 871-880 (2000).
Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IL01/00340, dated Feb. 24, 2003.
Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IL02/00477, dated Feb. 25, 2003.
Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB03/05551, dated Sep. 10, 2004.
“How is Ablatherm treatment performed?” http://www.edap-hifu.com/eng/physicians/hifu/3c—treatment—treat-description.htm, accessed Jan. 3, 2003.
“What is HIFU? HIFU: High Intensity Focused Ultrasound,” http://www.edap-hifu.com/eng/physicians/hifu2a—hifu—overview.htm, accessed Jan. 3, 2003.
“What are the physical principles?” http://www.edap-hifu.com/eng/physicians/hifu/2c—hifu—physical.htm, accessed Jan. 3, 2003.
“How does HIFU create a lesion?” http://www.edap-hifu.com/eng/physicians/hifu/2d—hifu—lesion.htm, accessed Jan. 3, 2003.
“Prostate Cancer Phase I Clinical Trials Using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU),” Focus Surgery, http://www.focus-surgery.com/PCT%20Treatment%20with%20HIFU.htm, accessed Jan. 3, 2003.
“Abstract” Focus Surgery, http://www.focus-surgery.com/Sanghvi.htm, accessed Jan. 3, 2003.
Exablate 2000 Specification, InSightec, Ltd. (2 pages).
FDA Approves Exablate 2000 as Non-invasive surgery for Fibroids, Oct. 22, 2004.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2010/000189, dated Jun. 1, 2010.
International Search Report for PCT/IB03/05551 dated Mar. 2, 2004 (5 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion in Internation Patent Application No. PCT/IB2010/000971, dated Jul. 29, 2010 (9 pages).
McDonnald et al. “Usefulness of MR Imaging-Derived Thermometry and Dosimetry in Determining the Threshold for Tissue Damage INduced by Thermal Surgery in Rabbits,” Radiology, vol. 216, No. 2000 pp. 517-523 (2000).
Suprijanto et al. “Displacement Correction Scheme for MR-Guided Interstitial Laser Therapy,” Ellis RE, Peters TM (Eds.): MiCCAI , LNCS 2879, pp. 399-407 (2003).
Shmatukha et al. “Correction of Proton Resonance Frequencey Shift Temperature Maps for Magnetic Field Disturbances Caused by Breathing,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 51, No. 18 pp. 4689-4705 (2006).
De Senneville et al., “An Optimised Multi-Baseline Approach for On-Line MR-Temperature Monitoring on Commodity Graphics Hardware,” Biomedical Imaging, pp. 1513-1516 (2008).
Vigen et al., “Triggered, Navigated, Multi-Baseline Method for Proton Resonance Frequency Temperature Mapping with Respiratory Motion,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 50, pp. 1003-1010 (2003).
“Body Sculpting/Liposuction”, available online at<http://www.cosmeticdoctor.com/sculpting.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-3.
“For Ultrasonic Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.ultrasonic-liposuction.com/index.html>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, 1 page.
“Glossary”, available online at <http://www.lipoinfo.com/glossary.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-14.
“Internal, External Ultrasound Aids Liposuction”, available online at<http://surgery.medscape.com/IMNG/SkinAllergyNews/1998/v.29.n03/san2903.46. 01.html> retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-3.
“Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.swmed.edu/home.sub.-pages/library/consumer/liposuc.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, 1 page.
“The Lipo Symposium”, available online at <http://liposymposium.com/details/History/>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, 1 page.
“Trends in Cosmetic Surgery: Lipoplasty (Liposuction)”, available online at <http://www.wrc-gbmc.org/4rd.html>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, 1 page.
“Ultrasonic Liposuction; Body Contouring”, available online at <http://www.drloomis.com/serv01.htm,>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-2.
“Ultrasonic-Assisted Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.liposymposium.com/details/procedure/techniqus/UAL/>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-2.
“Ultrasound Assisted Lipoplasty”, available online at <http://www.plasticsurgery.org/surgery/ual.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-4.
“Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.drhobar.com/ual.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-4.
“Ultrasound Liposuction or Ultrasound Assisted Lipoplasty—UAL”, available online at <http://www.ultrasonic-liposuction.com/InformationD.html>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-2.
“Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.providence-hospital.org/technology/lipo.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, 1 page.
“External Ultrasonic Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.lipoinfo.com/chap14..htm.>, retrived on Mar. 17, 2000.
“Liquefying the Fat: Ultrasound Expands Score of Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.swmed.edu/home.sub.-pages/new/liquilip.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-2.
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2004/001512, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 7, 2004, 7 pages.
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2010/002757, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 17, 2012, 10 pages.
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2010/002757, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 7, 2011, 15 pages.
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2010/002265, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 22, 2011, 16 pages.
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2010/002265, Partial International Search Report dated Mar. 11, 2011, 4 pages.
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2011/001293, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 8, 2012, 9 pages.
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2011/001375, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 10, 2011, 12 pages.
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2011/001375, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 8, 2012, 9 pages.
Examination Report in Chinese Patent Application No. 200680029730.8, dated Apr. 29, 2010, 7 pages.
Examination Report in Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-536968, dated Oct. 21, 2013, 18 pages.
Examination Report in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980153997.1, dated Apr. 15, 2014, 18 pages.
Examination Report in Chinese Patent Application No. 201080011633.2, dated Oct. 8, 2013, 19 pages.
Bates, B, “External Ultrasound's Liposuction Role Debated”, Available Online at <http://molecularmedicine.medscape.com/IMNG/SkinAllergyNews/19 . . . /san3003. 06.02.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-2.
Daum et al., “Thermal Dose Optimization Via Temporal Switching in Ultrasound Surgery”, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 45, No. 1, Jan. 1998, pp. 208-215.
Eisenhauer, K, “6/24—Ultrasound Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.channel6000.com/health/health-990624-191707.html>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-2.
Fjield et al., “Low-Profile Lenses for Ultrasound Surgery”, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 44, No. 7, Jul. 1999, pp. 1803-1813.
Hynynen et al., “Principles of MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound”, Chapter 25, pp. 237-243.
LIPOINFO.COM, “Glossary 70 words”, available online at <http://www.lipoinfo.com/glossary.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-14.
Nigro, D M., “Ultrasound Assisted Lipoplasty (Liposuction)”, available online at <http://www.drnigro.com/dennis.htm,>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, 1 page.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110270075 A1 Nov 2011 US