The present invention relates, generally, to systems and methods for ultrasound focusing. In particular, various embodiments are directed to focusing a multi-segment ultrasound transducer array utilizing, for example, magnetic-resonance acoustic radiation force imaging (MR-ARFI).
Focused ultrasound (i.e., acoustic waves having a frequency greater than about 20 kilohertz) can be used to image or therapeutically treat internal body tissues within a patient. For example, ultrasonic waves may be used to ablate tumors, eliminating the need for the patient to undergo invasive surgery. For this purpose, a piezo-ceramic transducer is placed externally to the patient, but in close proximity to the tissue to be ablated (“the target”). The transducer converts an electronic drive signal into mechanical vibrations, resulting in the emission of acoustic waves. The transducer may be shaped so that the waves converge in a focal zone. Alternatively or additionally, the transducer may be formed of a plurality of individually driven transducer elements whose phases can each be controlled independently from one another and, thus, can be set so as to result in constructive interference of the individual acoustic waves in the focal zone. Such a “phased-array” transducer facilitates steering the focal zone to different locations by adjusting the relative phases between the transducers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be utilized to visualize the focus and target in order to guide the ultrasound beam.
To minimize, for a given focus intensity, the intensity experienced by tissue regions surrounding the target, the ultrasound waves preferably come from multiple directions. This may require large transducer surfaces that surround the target as much as possible. Large-area transducers arrays may, however, be difficult to handle, and may complicate beam steering. Moreover, the placement of the transducer may be constrained by anatomical barriers, depending on the particular target location inside the body. For the treatment of different tissues and organs, differently shaped transducers may be desirable. Further, even if the location of the transducer with respect to the target is geometrically optimal, ultrasound waves coming from certain regions of the transducer surface may be blocked by strongly absorbing tissue, such as, e.g., bone, or other internal anatomical barriers. Accordingly, there is a need for focused ultrasound transducer arrays that are adjustable to various anatomical constraints.
The present invention provides, in various embodiments, ultrasound transducer arrangements including a plurality of separate, independently movable segments, and systems and methods for calibrating and driving these segments collectively to generate a common, “global” focus. The segments may be placed around a target in a way that exploits acoustic windows, i.e., beam paths along which the acoustic waves can travel without undergoing significant absorption, reflection, or scattering. In some embodiments, the transducer segments are mechanically coupled, either loosely or strongly, which reduces the number of degrees of freedom of the relative motion. In other embodiments, the segments are mechanically uncoupled.
In typical embodiments, each segment contains a plurality (e.g., tens, hundreds, or thousands of) transducer elements. In operation, the relative phases and/or amplitudes of these elements may be adjusted to steer the ultrasound beam emanating from the respective transducer segment along a desired direction, and create a focus at a desired distance. The required relative phases and/or amplitudes may be computed from information about the geometry of the transducer segment, its location and orientation relative to the target, and relevant material properties (e.g., the speed of sound at the employed frequency) along the beam path (hereinafter collectively referred to as a “sonication model”). Alternatively, they may be determined experimentally, either in the treatment setup itself or in a calibration setup before integration of the segment into the transducer arrangement for treatment, through iterative measurements of the focus quality and phase/amplitude adjustments. In some embodiments, computations based on a sonciation model are advantageously combined with experimental feedback.
Once the segments have been individually focused (so that the outputs of their transducer elements converge at a common location), their respective foci may be brought to overlap. In some embodiments, focusing the individual beams at the target location may suffice to generate the desired global focus. In general, however, the individual foci will be at least slightly displaced from one another, resulting in a blurred global focus. To improve the focus quality, one or more segments may be physically moved to translate and/or rotate the beam, and/or phase shift gradients may be applied across the transducer elements to adjust the beam steering angle(s).
In addition to the co-location of the foci of the various transducer segments, a global focus generally requires that the various acoustic waves arrive (at least approximately) in phase at the center of the global focus. The total phase of an acoustic wave from an individual segment may be adjusted by shifting the phases of all its elements simultaneously by the same amount. The acoustic waves from the different transducer segments may be brought in phase by varying the total phase associated with one segment while keeping the total phases of the other segments constant, and observing the resulting variation in the focus intensity and quality. The phase difference between the variable and constant phases at which the focus intensity in the center is maximized corresponds to the amount by which the total phase of the segment under test should be adjusted to improve the global focus. This procedure may be carried out for all of the segments in turn to achieve constructive interference at the center of the global focus. To reduce the number of sonications needed for this adjustment procedure, the initial settings of the relative total phases of the transducer segments may be based on information, to the extent available, about the relative locations and orientations of the segments.
Various techniques, including, for example, thermal imaging and MR-ARFI, may be used to visualize the focus during the calibration procedure described above. Thermal imaging is not possible in all types of tissues; for instance, it does not work in fat tissue because the resonant frequency of fat tissue is largely independent of temperature in a temperature range suitable for imaging Also, thermal imaging is associated with a local rise in temperature that is desirably avoided in certain tissue types, e.g., in a blood clot, for medical reasons. Magnetic-resonance acoustic radiation force imaging, on the other hand, is applicable to all types of soft tissue. It involves magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of minute material displacements resulting from pressure associated with an acoustic wave. The displacement increases with the acoustic field intensity. Thus, by adjusting the locations, beam directions, and/or total phases of the transducer segments to increase the material displacement, the intensity at the focus and, consequently, the focus quality may be improved. Compared with thermal imaging, MR-ARFI provides sufficient signal strength and contrast at lower levels of energy deposited into the material. Therefore, MR-ARFI may be employed in many situations in which thermal imaging, due to its potential to damage tissue, would be precluded. Further, MR-ARFI may allow a greater number of measurements, and hence a better focus, before the accumulated energy deposit reaches the limit of what is physiologically tolerable.
In one aspect, various embodiments of the invention are directed to a method of focusing an ultrasound transducer arrangement including a plurality of separate, independently movable segments, in which each transducer segment, in turn, includes a plurality of transducer elements. The transducer segments may be mechanically uncoupled or mechanically coupled. Mechanical coupling between two or more segments may eliminate a degree of freedom of relative motion between the segments. The method includes performing the following steps for each of the plurality of transducer segments: (i) driving the segment so as to generate an ultrasound focus; (ii) measuring a total phase associated with the focus relative to a phase of a global focus; and (iii) determining whether the focus is in phase with the global focus and, if not, adjusting the total phase of the focus to a phase of the global focus.
Driving the segment may include setting relative phases between the transducer elements of that segment so as to generate the ultrasound focus. The relative phase settings may be based (at least in part) on a sonication model. Alternatively, the relative phase settings may be determined (at least in part) by (i) driving a selected element of the segment at a variable phase while driving the other elements at a constant phase, thereby varying an intensity of the focus; (ii) determining a phase difference, if any, between the constant and variable phases where the intensity is maximized; and (iii) if the phase difference is non-zero, adjusting the phase of the selected element accordingly. In some embodiments, such an experimental adjustment of the relative phases is combined with the use of a sonication model.
Measuring the total phase of the focus relative to the phase of the global focus may be accomplished by (i) driving the segment at a variable phase while driving the other segments at a constant phase, thereby varying an intensity of the global focus; (ii) determining a phase difference, if any, between the constant and variable phases where the intensity is maximized; and (iii) if the phase difference is non-zero, adjusting the total phase of the segment based thereon. Determining the phase difference may involve imaging the focus, e.g., using MR-ARFI. The total phase of the focus may be adjusted by applying phase shifts of equal magnitude to all of the transducer elements of the segment generating that focus. In some embodiments, the method further includes measuring a location of the focus associated with each segment relative to a location of the global focus, determining whether the focus is co-located with the global focus, and, if not, shifting the focus to the global focus.
In another aspect, a method, in accordance with various embodiments, for focusing an ultrasound transducer arrangement having multiple separate, independently movable segments (wherein each transducer segment again includes a plurality of transducer elements) includes driving each segment so as to generate an ultrasound focus; measuring a location of the respective focus relative to a location of a global focus; and determining whether the respective focus is co-located with the global focus and, if not, shifting it to the global focus.
Measuring the location of the focus relative to the global focus may include imaging the focus, e.g., using MR-ARFI or thermal imaging. Shifting the focus may be accomplished by physically moving the segment or, alternatively or additionally, by applying a phase gradient across the transducer elements of the segment.
In yet another aspect, various embodiments of the invention provide a system for focusing ultrasound which includes an ultrasound transducer arrangement having a plurality of separate, independently movable segments, each transducer segment including a phased array of transducer elements for generating an ultrasound focus; an MRI system for imaging the ultrasound foci associated with the segments; and a control facility in communication with the magnetic resonance imaging system and the ultrasound transducer arrangement. The control facility is configured to (i) drive each segment to generate the associated ultrasound focus, (ii) determine (based at least in part on an image of the ultrasound focus) whether the focus is co-located and in phase with a global focus, and, if the focus of an individual segment is not co-located with the global focus, (iii) adjust at least one of a position, a total phase, or a phase gradient of the segment so as to co-locate and bring the focus in phase with the global focus.
In some embodiments, the transducer segments are mechanically uncoupled. In other embodiments, the transducer segments are mechanically coupled. For example, the transducer segments may form a linkage mechanism with a single degree of freedom. The MRI system, ultrasound transducer arrangement, and control facility may be collectively configured to image the ultrasound foci by MR-ARFI.
In another aspect, the invention provides, in various embodiments, a method of treating a target using ultrasound. The method includes arranging a plurality of separate, independently movable transducer segments (each comprising a plurality of transducer elements) around the target; calibrating the arrangement of the transducer segments; and then simultaneously driving the transducer segments to focus ultrasound into the target, thereby treating the target. The transducer segments may be arranged so as to exploit acoustic windows. Calibrating the arrangement of transducer segments is accomplished by (i) driving each segment to generate an ultrasound focus, and (ii) imaging the ultrasound focus of each segment to determine whether it coincides with a global focus at the target and, if not, adjusting the segment to bring the ultrasound focus in coincidence with the global focus.
Determining whether the ultrasound focus of a particular segment coincides with the global focus may involve determining whether the ultrasound focus is co-located with the global focus and/or whether the ultrasound focus is in phase with the global focus. If the focus associated with a segment is not co-located with the global focus, a position or a phase gradient of the segment may be adjusted. If the focus associated with a segment is out of phase with the global focus, the total phase of the segment may be adjusted.
In a further aspect, certain embodiments of the invention are directed to a control system for operating an ultrasound system including an arrangement of separate, independently movable transducer segments (each transducer segment comprising a phased array of transducer elements for generating an ultrasound focus associated with the segment) used in conjunction with an MRI system. The control system includes circuitry for (i) driving each segment to generate an associated ultrasound focus, (ii) based at least in part on an image of the ultrasound focus, determining whether the focus is co-located and in phase with a global focus, and, if not, (iii) adjusting at least one of a position, a total phase, or a phase gradient of the segment so as to co-locate and bring the focus in phase with the global focus.
The foregoing will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of the invention in conjunction with the drawings, wherein:
Each transducer segment 102 may comprise a one- or two-dimensional array (i.e., a row or a matrix) of individually controllable transducer elements 108. In other embodiments, the transducer elements 108 may be arranged in a non-coordinated fashion, i.e., they need not be spaced regularly or arranged in a regular pattern. In still other embodiments, one or more of the segments each include only one transducer element 108. The segments may have a curved (e.g., spherical or parabolic) shape, as illustrated, or may include one or more planar or otherwise shaped sections. Their dimensions may vary, depending on the application, between millimeters and tens of centimeters. The transducer elements 108 may be piezoelectric ceramic elements. Piezo-composite materials, or generally any materials capable of converting electrical energy to acoustic energy, may also be used. To damp the mechanical coupling between the elements 108, they may be mounted on the housing(s) using silicone rubber or any other suitable damping material.
The transducer elements 108 are separately controllable, i.e., they are each capable of emitting ultrasound waves at amplitudes and/or phases that are independent of the amplitudes and/or phases of the other transducers. A control facility 110 serves to drive the transducer elements 108. The control facility 110 may include separate control modules for each of the transducer segments 102. For n transducer elements 108 of a segment 102, a control module within the control facility 110 may contain n control circuits each comprising an amplifier and a phase delay circuit, each control circuit driving one of the transducer elements. The control facility 110 may split a radio frequency (RF) input signal, typically in the range from 0.1 MHz to 4 MHz, to provide n channels for the n control circuit (and additional channels for the other transducer segments). The control module may be configured to drive the individual transducer elements 108 of one segment 102 at the same frequency, but at different phases and different amplitudes so that they collectively produce a focused ultrasound beam. The control facility 110 may also include, for each of the transducer segments 102, an additional amplifier and phase delay circuit, which may be used to adjust the total amplitude and phase of the respective segment.
The control facility 110 desirably provides computational functionality, which may be implemented in software, hardware, firmware, hardwiring, or any combination thereof, to compute the required phases and amplitudes for a desired focus location. The computations carried out in the control facility may be based on sonication models for the transducer segments and/or experimental feedback about the focus quality, as described further below. In general, the control facility may include several separable apparatus, such as a frequency generator, one or more beamformers containing the amplifier and phase delay circuitry for each control module, and a computer (e.g., a general-purpose computer) performing the computations and communicating the phases and amplitudes for the individual transducer elements 108 to the beamformer(s). Such systems are readily available or can be implemented without undue experimentation.
The MRgFUS system 100 further includes an MRI apparatus 112 in communication with the control facility 110. The apparatus 112 may include a cylindrical electromagnet 114, which generates a static magnetic field within a bore thereof. During medical procedures, the patient may be placed inside the bore on a movable support table, and positioned such that an imaging region encompassing the ROI (e.g., the patient's liver) falls within a region where the magnetic field is substantially uniform. The magnetic field strength within the uniform region is typically between about 1.5 and about 3.0 Tesla. The magnetic field causes hydrogen nuclei spins to align and precess about the general direction of the magnetic field. An RF transmitter coil 116 surrounding the imaging region emits RF pulses into the imaging region, causing some of the aligned spins to oscillate between a temporary high-energy non-aligned state and the aligned state. This oscillation induces RF response signals, called the MR echo or MR response signals, in a receiver coil, which may, but need not, be the transmitter coil 116. The MR response signals are amplified, conditioned, and digitized into raw data using an image processing system, and further transformed into arrays of image data by methods known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Based on the image data, the target 106 (e.g., a tumor) is identified. Further, in some embodiments, the position and/or orientation of the segments are determined from MRI markers in the image (e.g., generated by MR coils that are embedded in or affixed to the segments). The ultrasound transducer segments 102 are then each driven so as to focus ultrasound into (or near) the treatment region.
To align the foci generated by the various transducer segments 102 with one another and with the target 106, the foci may be visualized using one of a number of magnetic-resonance-based imaging techniques, such as, e.g., thermal MRI or MR-ARFI. Because MR-ARFI generally requires lower ultrasound energies during alignment and calibration procedures than other methods, and the ultrasound intensity preceding the actual treatment should be minimized to avoid damage to tissue outside the target, MR-ARFI is typically preferred. In MR-ARFI, a transducer is driven so as to focus an ultrasound wave pulse into the body at or near the target. The ultrasound wave exerts acoustic radiation pressure onto the material along its path. At the focus, where the waves converge, this pressure is highest, resulting in a temporary local displacement of the material in the longitudinal direction and/or in shear waves that propagate radially away from the focus. Thus, the ultrasound pressure creates a displacement field that directly reflects the acoustic field. The displacement field may be visualized by applying transient-motion or displacement-sensitizing magnetic field gradients to the imaging region by gradient coils, which are part of standard MRI systems and are typically located near the cylindrical electromagnet 114. When the ultrasound pulse is applied in the presence of such gradients, the resulting displacement is directly encoded into the phase of the MR response signal. For example, the gradient coils and transducer may be configured such that the ultrasound pulse pushes material near the focus towards regions of the magnetic field with higher field strengths. In response to the resulting change in the magnetic field, the phase of the MR response signal changes proportionally, thereby encoding in the signal the displacement caused by the ultrasound radiation pressure.
To achieve high image contrast, the ultrasound pulse, encoding gradients, and RF pulse are precisely timed with respect to each other according to a suitable displacement-encoding sequence.
An example of an MR-ARFI image of an ultrasound focus region is shown in
In principle, it is possible to adjust the focus of a multi-segment transducer by adjusting each individual transducer element 108, without regard to the arrangement of the elements 108 in multiple segments 102. In practice, however, this procedure may take an undesirably long time, and may not be necessary. Since the transducer elements 108 within one segment are rigidly connected with each other, a-priori knowledge of the surface of that transducer segment may suffice to create a focus of sufficient quality with that segment. Such a-priori knowledge may be obtained in a calibration procedure outside the body, e.g., using a phantom. Suitable calibration procedures are described, for example, in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/251,450, filed Oct. 14, 2009, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
In brief, mapping of the full transducer array of a segment may be accomplished by varying and adjusting the phase of each element, one at a time, while driving the remaining elements at constant phase, and monitoring the focus quality, e.g., using MR-ARFI. Typically, after each element has been mapped independently, the focus quality has significantly improved. Since the necessary phase adjustments of the transducer elements are all interrelated, however, the focus may not yet be optimal after one iteration. Therefore, in some embodiments, the procedure may be repeated iteratively. With each iteration, the phase adjustments made to maximize the displacement in the focus will, generally, decrease. Thus, a termination condition may be defined by setting a threshold value for phase adjustments, below which further adjustments are deemed immaterial or not clinically necessary. The number of iterations required to reach the termination condition may depend on the order in which the transducer elements are mapped. A mathematical algorithm, for example a “greedy algorithm” as known to persons of skill in the art, may be used to select a mapping order that results in fast convergence of the phase settings.
When a transducer segment calibrated with a phantom is placed into a treatment setup (such as the one shown in
In some embodiments, fine adjustments to the relative phases (and, in some cases, amplitudes) between transducer elements of a pre-calibrated transducer segment are desired after integration of the segment into the treatment setup. Further, in certain embodiments, the individual transducer segments are mapped directly in the treatment setup. In both cases, phase adjustments may be based on geometric and/or material parameters of a sonication model (including, e.g., information about the relative arrangement of the segment and target, and/or acoustic material parameters of the tissue(s) between the segment and target), iterative experimental feedback, or a combination of both. For example, transducer elements within a segment may be grouped according to a-priori knowledge about the types and acoustic properties of tissues along the respective acoustic wave paths to the target, and the relative phases between groups of elements may then be adjusted using MR-ARFI. Experimental feedback may also be used to ascertain an unknown parameter of a sonciation model. Further detail about the calculation of relative phases (and, optionally, amplitudes) based on a sonication model is described, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/425,698, filed on Apr. 17, 2009, and further detail about the combination of sonication-model-based computations and measurements of focus quality to efficiently adjust the relative phases of the transducer elements is described in a U.S. patent application entitled, “Efficient Ultrasound Focusing,” filed on even date herewith. Both applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
A-priori knowledge of the tissues may be obtained, for example, from measurements of the acoustic material properties of the tissues. Information about the location and/or orientation of the segment relative to the target may be known from the design of the treatment setup, and/or measured with sensors, such as MR tracking coils or position sensors (e.g., tilt indicators, ultrasound encoders, or optical encoders) embedded in the segment. Further, if multiple segments are mechanically linked, information about the location and/or orientation of one segment may provide information about the location and/or orientation of another segment. For example, the position of one segment of a linkage mechanism, together with the relative orientations of the joints between the segments, suffices to determine the positions of the other transducer segments, reducing the number of sensors needed.
Once the foci are co-located in a global focus, their total phases are adjusted so that the waves from different transducer segments arrive in phase at a center point or region of the focus. The initial total phases of the transducers may (but need not) be based on information about the relative positions and/or orientations of the transducer segments (which may be available, in particular, for mechanically coupled segments). When all the foci are in phase with each other, the global focus will have an intensity profile in which the intensity decreases monotonously with the distance from a center. Otherwise, when some of the foci are out of phase, a different intensity profile may be observed. For example, assuming that each segment contributes the same amount of energy to the focal region, if half of the segments are phase-shifted by π with respect to the other half, the waves interfere destructively at the center, but form interference fringes (e.g., a ring pattern) in the surrounding region. For the purpose of bringing the ultrasound foci in phase, one transducer segment may be selected (step 410), and the total phase of that segment may be varied (step 412) while the phases of the other segments are held constant. Simultaneously with the phase variation, the global focus may be imaged (step 414), again using MR-ARFI, for example. The intensity at the center of the global focus (and thus, in MR-ARFI, the tissue displacement) will be maximized when the ultrasound wave of the segment under test is in phase with the overall ultrasound field generated by the other segments. Therefore, the total phase of the tested segment at which the intensity is maximized constitutes the phase shift by which the total phase is subsequently adjusted (step 416). The adjustment step is repeated for each transducer segment until all the segments produce ultrasound foci that are in phase with each other. Alternatively, the phase shifts may first be determined for all the segments without adjustments being made, and subsequently, all the phase adjustments may be made at once. Once the transducer arrangement has been calibrated, i.e., the individual foci have been co-located in brought in phase, the transducer segments may be driven simultaneously to treat the target.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific details, it is not intended that such details should be regarded as limitations upon the scope of the invention, except as and to the extent that they are included in the accompanying claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2795709 | Camp | Jun 1957 | A |
3142035 | Harris | Jul 1964 | A |
3559159 | Harms et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3942150 | Booth et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3974475 | Burckhardt et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3992693 | Martin et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4000493 | Spaulding et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4052723 | Miller | Oct 1977 | A |
4074564 | Anderson | Feb 1978 | A |
4206653 | Lemay | Jun 1980 | A |
4211132 | Nichols, III et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4221132 | Poole | Sep 1980 | A |
4307613 | Fox | Dec 1981 | A |
4339952 | Foster | Jul 1982 | A |
4441486 | Pounds | Apr 1984 | A |
4454597 | Sullivan | Jun 1984 | A |
4478083 | Hassler et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4505156 | Questo | Mar 1985 | A |
4526168 | Hassler et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4537074 | Dietz | Aug 1985 | A |
4549533 | Cain et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4554925 | Young | Nov 1985 | A |
4586512 | Do-huu et al. | May 1986 | A |
4616231 | Autrey et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4636964 | Jacobs et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4646756 | Watmough et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4647808 | Shibuya | Mar 1987 | A |
4662222 | Johnson | May 1987 | A |
4757820 | Itoh | Jul 1988 | A |
4817614 | Hassler et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4823053 | Mccracken et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4858597 | Kurtze et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4858613 | Fry et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4865042 | Umemura et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4886491 | Parisi et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4888746 | Wurster et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4889122 | Watmough et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4893284 | Magrane | Jan 1990 | A |
4893624 | Lele | Jan 1990 | A |
4937767 | Reuschel et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4938217 | Lele | Jul 1990 | A |
4957099 | Hassler | Sep 1990 | A |
5015929 | Cathignol et al. | May 1991 | A |
5143063 | Fellner | Sep 1992 | A |
5165412 | Okazaki | Nov 1992 | A |
5172343 | O'donnell | Dec 1992 | A |
5197475 | Antich et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5209221 | Riedlinger | May 1993 | A |
5211160 | Talish et al. | May 1993 | A |
5247935 | Cline et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5266863 | Nonami et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267221 | Miller et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269307 | Fife et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5271400 | Dumoulin et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5275165 | Ettinger et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5291890 | Cline et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305737 | Vago | Apr 1994 | A |
5307812 | Hardy et al. | May 1994 | A |
5307816 | Hashimoto et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318025 | Dumoulin et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5323779 | Hardy et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5327884 | Hardy et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5329930 | Thomas, III et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5368031 | Cline et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368032 | Cline et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5379642 | Reckwerdt et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388461 | Rigby | Feb 1995 | A |
5391140 | Schaetzle et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5413550 | Castel | May 1995 | A |
5419761 | Narayanan et al. | May 1995 | A |
5435312 | Spivey et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443068 | Cline et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5474071 | Chapelon et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5477736 | Lorraine | Dec 1995 | A |
5485839 | Aida et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5490512 | Kwon et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5490840 | Uzgiris et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5507790 | Weiss | Apr 1996 | A |
5514086 | Parisi et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520186 | Deitrich | May 1996 | A |
5520188 | Hennige et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520612 | Winder et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526814 | Cline et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527273 | Manna et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5546360 | Deegan | Aug 1996 | A |
5549638 | Burdette | Aug 1996 | A |
5553618 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5573497 | Chapelon | Nov 1996 | A |
5582578 | Zhong et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590653 | Aida et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5590657 | Cain et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601526 | Chapelon et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5605154 | Ries et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606971 | Sarvazyan | Mar 1997 | A |
5617371 | Williams | Apr 1997 | A |
5617857 | Chader et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5643179 | Fujimoto | Jul 1997 | A |
5662170 | Donovan et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5665054 | Dory | Sep 1997 | A |
5666954 | Chapelon et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676673 | Ferre et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687729 | Schaetzle | Nov 1997 | A |
5694936 | Fujimoto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5711300 | Schneider et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5718226 | Riza | Feb 1998 | A |
5722411 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725482 | Bishop | Mar 1998 | A |
5728062 | Brisken | Mar 1998 | A |
5739625 | Falcus | Apr 1998 | A |
5743863 | Chapelon | Apr 1998 | A |
5752515 | Jolesz et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759162 | Oppelt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5762616 | Talish | Jun 1998 | A |
5769790 | Watkins et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769879 | Richards et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784336 | Gopinathan et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5810008 | Dekel et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810731 | Sarvazyan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817021 | Reichenberger | Oct 1998 | A |
5817036 | Anthony et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823990 | Henley | Oct 1998 | A |
5827204 | Grandia et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5873845 | Cline et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884631 | Silberg | Mar 1999 | A |
5885211 | Eppstein et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891040 | Grenon et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897495 | Aida et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904659 | Duarte et al. | May 1999 | A |
5922962 | Ishrak et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5938600 | Van Vaals et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938608 | Bieger et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947900 | Derbyshire et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5984881 | Ishibashi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6004269 | Crowley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007499 | Martin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013048 | Podany et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023636 | Wendt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032675 | Rubinsky | Mar 2000 | A |
6033375 | Brumbach | Mar 2000 | A |
6036644 | Schutt | Mar 2000 | A |
6039048 | Silberg | Mar 2000 | A |
6042556 | Beach et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045777 | Church et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6071239 | Cribbs et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088295 | Altes | Jul 2000 | A |
6106511 | Jensen | Aug 2000 | A |
6113558 | Rosenschein et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6113559 | Klopotek | Sep 2000 | A |
6128522 | Acker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128958 | Cain | Oct 2000 | A |
6135960 | Holmberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6135971 | Hutchinson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142939 | Eppstein et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156549 | Drewes et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6193659 | Ramamurthy et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6217530 | Martin et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6242915 | Hurd | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246895 | Plewes | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246896 | Dumoulin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263230 | Haynor et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267734 | Ishibashi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289233 | Dumoulin et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309355 | Cain et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317619 | Boernert et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322527 | Talish | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334846 | Ishibashi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6350245 | Cimino | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6374132 | Acker et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392330 | Zloter et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397094 | Ludeke et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413216 | Cain et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419648 | Vitek et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424597 | Bolomey et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425867 | Vaezy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428477 | Mason | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6428532 | Doukas et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433464 | Jones | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6461314 | Pant et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475150 | Haddad | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6478739 | Hong | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503204 | Sumanaweera et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506154 | Ezion et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506171 | Vitek et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508774 | Acker et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511064 | Phinney et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511428 | Azuma et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522142 | Freundlich | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523272 | Morales | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524251 | Rabiner et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6543272 | Vitek | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554826 | Deardorff | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559644 | Froundlich et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6566878 | Komura et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6582381 | Yehezkeli et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589174 | Chopra et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599256 | Acker et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6612988 | Maor et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6613004 | Vitek et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6613005 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618608 | Watkins et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618620 | Freundlich et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626854 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626855 | Weng et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629929 | Jago et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6645162 | Friedman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652461 | Levkovitz | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6666833 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676601 | Lacoste et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6676602 | Barnes et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6679855 | Horn et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6705994 | Vortman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719694 | Weng et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6733450 | Alexandrov et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6735461 | Vitek et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6761691 | Tsuzuki | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770031 | Hynynen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6770039 | Zhong et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788619 | Calvert | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6790180 | Vitek | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805129 | Pless et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6824516 | Batten et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6936046 | Hissong et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6951540 | Ebbini et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6961606 | DeSilets et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7001379 | Behl et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7077820 | Kadziauskas et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7094205 | Marmarelis | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7128711 | Medan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7155271 | Halperin et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7175596 | Vitek et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7175599 | Hynynen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7264592 | Shehada | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7264597 | Cathignol | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7267650 | Chow et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7344509 | Hynynen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7377900 | Vitek et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7429248 | Winder et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7452357 | Vlegele et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7505805 | Kuroda | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505808 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7507213 | Schultheiss et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510536 | Foley et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511501 | Wexler | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7535794 | Prus et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7553284 | Vaitekunas | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7603162 | Danz et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611462 | Vortman et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7652410 | Prus | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7699780 | Vitek et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7819805 | Davies et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8002706 | Vortman et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8057408 | Cain et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075488 | Burton | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8088067 | Vortman et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8409099 | Vitek et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425424 | Zadicario et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8608672 | Vortman et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8617073 | Prus et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8661873 | Medan et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20010031922 | Weng et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020016557 | Duarte et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035779 | Krieg et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020082528 | Friedman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082589 | Friedman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095087 | Mourad et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111552 | Maor et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020151790 | Abend | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161300 | Hoff et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020188229 | Ryaby | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004439 | Pant et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030060820 | Maguire et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030187371 | Vortman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040030251 | Ebbini et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059265 | Candy et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068186 | Ishida et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082868 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040116809 | Chow et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122316 | Satoh | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122323 | Vortman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143187 | Biagi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147919 | Behl et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040210134 | Hynynen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210135 | Hynynen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236253 | Vortman et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236523 | Taylor | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267126 | Takeuchi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033201 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050096542 | Weng et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131301 | Peszynski et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154304 | Robinson | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050199058 | Danz et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203444 | Schonenberger et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240126 | Foley et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251046 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060052661 | Gannot et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052701 | Carter et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052706 | Hynynen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058671 | Vitek et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058678 | Vitek et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060106300 | Seppenwoolde et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060173307 | Amara et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173321 | Kubota et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173385 | Lidgren et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184034 | Haim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184069 | Vaitekunas | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206105 | Chopra et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229594 | Francischelli et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235302 | Grossman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070016039 | Vortman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070055140 | Kuroda | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066897 | Sekins et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073135 | Lee et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070098232 | Matula et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070167781 | Vortman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167798 | Cai et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070197918 | Vitek et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219470 | Talish et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239062 | Chopra et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265560 | Soltani et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276237 | Li | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080027342 | Rouw et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030104 | Prus | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080031090 | Prus et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080033278 | Assif | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082026 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103558 | Wenzel et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080108900 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125660 | Yao et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080183077 | Moreau-Gobard et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080228081 | Becker et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080312562 | Routh et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090088623 | Vortman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090093721 | Katsuyama | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090096450 | Roland | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118619 | Oshiki | May 2009 | A1 |
20100030076 | Vortman et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100056962 | Vortman et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100125193 | Zadicario | May 2010 | A1 |
20100179425 | Zadicario | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100268088 | Prus et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274130 | Anand et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100318002 | Prus et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110066032 | Vitek et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110094288 | Medan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110130663 | Raju et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137147 | Skliar et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110251527 | Kushculey et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270136 | Vitek et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120083695 | Napolitano et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130077441 | Ramamurthy et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140112095 | Medan et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1744861 | Mar 2006 | CN |
1981708 | Jun 2007 | CN |
4345308 | Feb 2001 | DE |
10102317 | Aug 2002 | DE |
0031614 | Jul 1981 | EP |
151073 | Aug 1985 | EP |
174920 | Mar 1986 | EP |
272347 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0320303 | Jun 1989 | EP |
450334 | Oct 1991 | EP |
462311 | Dec 1991 | EP |
467690 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0558029 | Sep 1993 | EP |
627206 | Dec 1994 | EP |
734742 | Oct 1996 | EP |
1132054 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1582886 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1591073 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1774920 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1790384 | May 2007 | EP |
1936404 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2692999 | Dec 1993 | FR |
2806611 | Sep 2001 | FR |
2019565 | Oct 1979 | GB |
5-92008 | Apr 1993 | JP |
7-184907 | Jul 1995 | JP |
7-231895 | Sep 1995 | JP |
7-313518 | Dec 1995 | JP |
11313833 | Nov 1999 | JP |
00166940 | Jun 2000 | JP |
01516075 | Sep 2001 | JP |
02530145 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2006-503653 | Feb 2006 | JP |
WO-9100059 | Jan 1991 | WO |
9115999 | Oct 1991 | WO |
9119332 | Dec 1991 | WO |
9315415 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO-95014505 | Jun 1995 | WO |
9717018 | May 1997 | WO |
WO-9852465 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO-0031614 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0078232 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0143640 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0159337 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0158337 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0166189 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0180708 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-0180709 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0180708 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-0243805 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-0244753 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-0258791 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO-03013654 | Feb 2003 | WO |
03070105 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO-03097162 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO-03098232 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004021044 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004066856 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO-2004093686 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005038745 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO-200558029 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO-2006018837 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2006021851 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006025001 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006087649 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO-2006119572 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2007051066 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2007073551 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007093998 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008015523 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO-2008039449 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO-2008050278 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-200875203 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO-2008119054 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2009055587 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009085466 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009081339 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009094554 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2010058292 | May 2010 | WO |
WO-2010082135 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO-2010119340 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO-2010143072 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO-2011013001 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO-2011024074 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO-2011045669 | Apr 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Fronheiser et al., “3D Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Imaging Using a 2D Matrix Array: Feasibility Study,” Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 1144-1147 (Oct. 2006). |
Wu et al., “MRImaging of Shear Waves Generated by Focused Ultrasound,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 43, pp. 111-115 (2000). |
Heikkila et al., “Simulations of Lesion Detection Using a Combined Phased Array LHMI-Technique,”Ultrasonics, IPC Science and Technology Press Ltd., vol. 48, No. 6-7, pp. 568-573 (Nov. 2008). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 19, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/IB2011/001293 (13 pages). |
McGough et al., “Direct Computation of Ultrasound Phased-Array Driving Signals from a Specified Temperature Distribution for Hyperthermia,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 39, No. 8, pp. 825-835 (Aug. 1992). |
Botros et al., “A hybrid computational model for ultrasound phased-array heating in presence of strongly scattering obstacles,” IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., vol. 44, No. 11, pp. 1039-1050 (Nov. 1997). |
Cain et al., “Concentric-ring and Sector-vortex Phased-array Applicators for Ultrasound Hperthermia,” IEEE Trans. on Microwave Theory & Techniques, vol. MTT-34, No. 5, pp. 542-551 (May 1986). |
Chen et al., “MR Acoustic Radiation Force Imaging: Comparison of Encoding Gradients.” |
Cline et al., “Focused US system for MR imaging-guide tumor ablation,” Radiology, v. 194, No. 3, pp. 731-738 (Mar. 1995). |
Cline et al., “MR Temperature mapping of focused ultrasound surgery,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 628-636 (1994). |
Cline et al., “Simultaneous magnetic resonance phase and magnitude temperature maps in muscle,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 309-315 (Mar. 1996). |
Daum et al., “Design and evaluation of a feedback based phased array system for ultrasound surgery,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Control, vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 431-434 (1998). |
de Senneville et al., “Real-time adaptive methods for treatment of mobile organs by MRI-controlled high-intensity focussed Ultrasound,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 57:319-330 (2007). |
Fjield et al, “The Combined Concentric-ring and Sector-vortex Phased Array for MRI Guided Ultrasound Surgery,” IEEE Trans. on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Freq. Cont., vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 1157-1167 (Sep. 1997). |
Herbert et al., “Energy-based adaptive focusing of waves: application to ultrasonic transcranial therapy,” 8th Intl. Symp. on Therapeutic Ultrasound. |
Huber et al., “A New Noninvasive Approach in Breast Cancer Therapy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focussed Ultrasound Surgery,” Cancer Research 61, 8441-8447 (Dec. 2001). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2004/001512, dated Dec. 8, 2005. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2004/001498, dated Aug. 31, 2004. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2005/002273, dated Dec. 20, 2005. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2005/002413, dated Nov. 22, 2005. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2006/001641, dated Sep. 25, 2006. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2006/003300, dated Feb. 14, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2007/001079, dated Dec. 10, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2007/002134, dated Dec. 13, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2007/002140, dated Dec. 29, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2008/003069, dated Apr. 27, 2009. |
Jolesz et al., “Integration of interventional MRI with computer-assisted surgery,” J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 12:69-77 (2001). |
Kohler et al., “Volumetric HIFU Ablation guided by multiplane MRI thermometry,” 8th Intl. Symp. on Therapeutic Ultrasound, edited by E.S. Ebbini, U. of Minn. (Sep. 2009). |
Kowalski et al., “Optimization of electromagnetic phased-arrays for hyperthermia via magnetic resonance temperature estimation,” IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., vol. 49, No. 11, pp. 1229-1241 (Nov. 2002). |
Maxwell et al., “Noninvasive thrombolysis using pulsed ultrasound cavitation therapy—Histotripsy,” Abstract, U.S. Natl. Lib. of Med., NIH, Ultrasound Med. Biol. (Oct. 23, 2009). |
McDannold et al., “MRI evaluation of thermal ablation of tumors and focused ultrasounds,” JMRI vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 91-100 (1998). |
McDannold et al., “Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging,” Med. Phys. vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 3748-3758 (Aug. 2008). |
Medel et al., “Sonothrombolysis: An emerging modality for the management of stroke,” Neurosurgery, vol. 65, No. 5, pp. 979-993. |
Mougenot et al., “MR monitoring of the near-field HIFU heating,” 8th Intl. Symp. on Therapeutic Ultrasound, edited by E.S. Ebbini, U. of Minn. (Sep. 2009). |
Partial International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2007/001079, dated Sep. 25, 2007. |
Vimeux et al., “Real-time control of focused ultrasound heating based on rapid MR thermometry,” Investig. Radiology, vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 190-193. |
Vykhodtseva et al., “MRI detection of the thermal effects of focused ultrasound on the brain,” Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 871-880 (2000). |
Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IL01/00340, dated Feb. 24, 2003. |
Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IL02/00477, dated Feb. 25, 2003. |
Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB03/05551, dated Sep. 10, 2004. |
“How is Ablatherm treatment performed?” http://www.edap-hifu.com/eng/physicians/hifu/3c—treatment—treat-description.htm, accessed Jan. 3, 2003. |
“What is HIFU? HIFU: High Intensity Focused Ultrasound,” http://www.edap-hifu.com/eng/physicians/hifu2a—hifu—overview.htm, accessed Jan. 3, 2003. |
“What are the physical principles?” http://www.edap-hifu.com/eng/physicians/hifu/2c—hifu—physical.htm, accessed Jan. 3, 2003. |
“How does HIFU create a lesion?” http://www.edap-hifu.com/eng/physicians/hifu/2d—hifu—lesion.htm, accessed Jan. 3, 2003. |
“Prostate Cancer Phase I Clinical Trials Using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU),” Focus Surgery, http://www.focus-surgery.com/PCT%20Treatment%20with%20HIFU.htm, accessed Jan. 3, 2003. |
“Abstract” Focus Surgery, http://www.focus-surgery.com/Sanghvi.htm, accessed Jan. 3, 2003. |
Exablate 2000 Specification, InSightec, Ltd. (2 pages). |
FDA Approves Exablate 2000 as Non-invasive surgery for Fibroids, Oct. 22, 2004. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2010/000189, dated Jun. 1, 2010. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB03/05551 dated Mar. 2, 2004 (5 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in Internation Patent Application No. PCT/IB2010/000971, dated Jul. 29, 2010 (9 pages). |
McDonnald et al. “Usefulness of MR Imaging-Derived Thermometry and Dosimetry in Determining the Threshold for Tissue Damage INduced by Thermal Surgery in Rabbits,” Radiology, vol. 216, No. 2000 pp. 517-523 (2000). |
Suprijanto et al. “Displacement Correction Scheme for MR-Guided Interstitial Laser Therapy,” Ellis RE, Peters TM (Eds.): MiCCAI , LNCS 2879, pp. 399-407 (2003). |
Shmatukha et al. “Correction of Proton Resonance Frequencey Shift Temperature Maps for Magnetic Field Disturbances Caused by Breathing,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 51, No. 18 pp. 4689-4705 (2006). |
De Senneville et al., “An Optimised Multi-Baseline Approach for On-Line MR-Temperature Monitoring on Commodity Graphics Hardware,” Biomedical Imaging, pp. 1513-1516 (2008). |
Vigen et al., “Triggered, Navigated, Multi-Baseline Method for Proton Resonance Frequency Temperature Mapping with Respiratory Motion,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 50, pp. 1003-1010 (2003). |
“Body Sculpting/Liposuction”, available online at<http://www.cosmeticdoctor.com/sculpting.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-3. |
“For Ultrasonic Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.ultrasonic-liposuction.com/index.html>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, 1 page. |
“Glossary”, available online at <http://www.lipoinfo.com/glossary.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-14. |
“Internal, External Ultrasound Aids Liposuction”, available online at<http://surgery.medscape.com/IMNG/SkinAllergyNews/1998/v.29.n03/san2903.46. 01.html> retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-3. |
“Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.swmed.edu/home.sub.-pages/library/consumer/liposuc.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, 1 page. |
“The Lipo Symposium”, available online at <http://liposymposium.com/details/History/>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, 1 page. |
“Trends in Cosmetic Surgery: Lipoplasty (Liposuction)”, available online at <http://www.wrc-gbmc.org/4rd.html>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, 1 page. |
“Ultrasonic Liposuction; Body Contouring”, available online at <http://www.drloomis.com/serv01.htm,>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-2. |
“Ultrasonic-Assisted Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.liposymposium.com/details/procedure/techniqus/UAL/>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-2. |
“Ultrasound Assisted Lipoplasty”, available online at <http://www.plasticsurgery.org/surgery/ual.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-4. |
“Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.drhobar.com/ual.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-4. |
“Ultrasound Liposuction or Ultrasound Assisted Lipoplasty—UAL”, available online at <http://www.ultrasonic-liposuction.com/InformationD.html>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-2. |
“Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.providence-hospital.org/technology/lipo.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, 1 page. |
“External Ultrasonic Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.lipoinfo.com/chap14..htm.>, retrived on Mar. 17, 2000. |
“Liquefying the Fat: Ultrasound Expands Score of Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.swmed.edu/home.sub.-pages/new/liquilip.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-2. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2004/001512, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 7, 2004, 7 pages. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2010/002757, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 17, 2012, 10 pages. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2010/002757, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 7, 2011, 15 pages. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2010/002265, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 22, 2011, 16 pages. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2010/002265, Partial International Search Report dated Mar. 11, 2011, 4 pages. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2011/001293, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 8, 2012, 9 pages. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2011/001375, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 10, 2011, 12 pages. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2011/001375, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 8, 2012, 9 pages. |
Examination Report in Chinese Patent Application No. 200680029730.8, dated Apr. 29, 2010, 7 pages. |
Examination Report in Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-536968, dated Oct. 21, 2013, 18 pages. |
Examination Report in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980153997.1, dated Apr. 15, 2014, 18 pages. |
Examination Report in Chinese Patent Application No. 201080011633.2, dated Oct. 8, 2013, 19 pages. |
Bates, B, “External Ultrasound's Liposuction Role Debated”, Available Online at <http://molecularmedicine.medscape.com/IMNG/SkinAllergyNews/19 . . . /san3003. 06.02.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-2. |
Daum et al., “Thermal Dose Optimization Via Temporal Switching in Ultrasound Surgery”, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 45, No. 1, Jan. 1998, pp. 208-215. |
Eisenhauer, K, “6/24—Ultrasound Liposuction”, available online at <http://www.channel6000.com/health/health-990624-191707.html>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-2. |
Fjield et al., “Low-Profile Lenses for Ultrasound Surgery”, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 44, No. 7, Jul. 1999, pp. 1803-1813. |
Hynynen et al., “Principles of MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound”, Chapter 25, pp. 237-243. |
LIPOINFO.COM, “Glossary 70 words”, available online at <http://www.lipoinfo.com/glossary.htm>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, pp. 1-14. |
Nigro, D M., “Ultrasound Assisted Lipoplasty (Liposuction)”, available online at <http://www.drnigro.com/dennis.htm,>, retrieved on Mar. 17, 2000, 1 page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110270075 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |