The application relates generally to gas turbine engines and, more particularly, to a multi-spool engine architecture.
Gas turbine engines are subject to continued improvements. For instance, there is continuing need to improve the thermodynamic cycle performance of engines while providing for compact and lightweight engine installations.
In one aspect, there is provided a multi-spool gas turbine engine comprising: a low pressure (LP) spool; a high pressure (HP) spool, the LP spool and the HP spool being independently rotatable about a central axis, the LP pressure spool comprising an LP compressor and an LP turbine, the HP spool comprising an HP turbine and an HP compressor; and an accessory gear box (AGB) mounted in axial series at one end of the engine, the LP compressor being axially positioned between the HP compressor and the AGB, the AGB being drivingly connected to the HP spool through the center of the LP compressor.
In another aspect, there is provided a multi-spool gas turbine engine comprising: a low pressure (LP) spool; a high pressure (HP) spool; the LP spool and the HP spool being mounted for rotation about a central axis; the LP pressure spool comprising an LP compressor and an LP turbine, the HP spool comprising an HP turbine and an HP compressor; and an accessory gear box (AGB) drivingly connected to the HP spool, the LP compressor being axially positioned between the HP compressor and the AGB and drivingly connected to the LP turbine via a gear train.
In a further aspect, there is provided a turboprop or turboshaft engine comprising: an output drive shaft configured to drivingly engage a rotatable load; a low pressure (LP) spool comprising an LP turbine and an LP compressor, the output drive shaft being drivingly connected to the LP turbine, the LP compressor being drivingly connected to the LP turbine via a first gear train; a high pressure (HP) spool rotatable independently of the LP spool, and an accessory gearbox (AGB) drivingly connected to the HP compressor, the LP compressor being positioned axially between the AGB and the HP compressor, and wherein the AGB has an input axis coaxial to a centerline of the LP compressor.
In a still further aspect, there is provided a reverse flow gas turbine engine, comprising: an output drive shaft having a front end configurable to drivingly engage a rotatable load; a low pressure (LP) spool including an LP turbine drivingly engaged to the output drive shaft, and an LP compressor drivingly connected to the LP turbine via a gear train, the LP turbine disposed forward of the LP compressor relative to a front end of the output drive shaft; and a high pressure HP spool including an HP turbine and an HP compressor drivingly engaged to an HP shaft rotatable independently of the LP spool, the HP compressor disposed forward of the LP compressor and in fluid communication therewith, and the HP turbine disposed aft of the LP turbine and in fluid communication therewith.
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures in which:
The gas turbine engine 10 has an axially extending central core which defines a gaspath 18 through which gases flow, as depicted by flow arrows in
It will thus be appreciated that the expressions “forward” and “aft” used herein refer to the relative disposition of components of the engine 10, in correspondence to the “forward” and “aft” directions of the engine 10 and aircraft including the engine 10 as defined with respect to the direction of travel. In the embodiment shown, a component of the engine 10 that is “forward” of another component is arranged within the engine 10 such that it is located closer to output shaft 16 (e.g. closer to the propeller in a turboprop application). Similarly, a component of the engine 10 that is “aft” of another component is arranged within the engine 10 such that it is further away from the output shaft 16.
Still referring to
The LP spool 20 includes at least one component to compress the air that is part of the compressor section 12, and at least one component to extract energy from the combustion gases that is part of the turbine section 14. More particularly, the LP spool 20 has a low pressure turbine 21, also known as a power turbine, which may include different number of stages (three stages in the illustrated embodiment), and which drives an LP compressor 22 (also referred to as a boost). The low pressure turbine 21 drives the low pressure compressor 22, thereby causing the LP compressor 22 to pressurize incoming air from the air inlet 11. The LP compressor 22 is disposed just forward of the air inlet 11. Both the LP turbine 21 and the LP compressor 22 are disposed along the center axis 17. In the depicted embodiment, both the LP turbine 21 and the LP compressor 22 include rotatable components having an axis of rotation that is coaxial with the center axis 17. It is understood that they can each include one or more stages depending upon the desired engine thermodynamic cycle.
The LP turbine 21 is forward of the LP compressor 22. The LP turbine 21 is also aft of the exhaust outlet 15. The LP compressor 22 is forward of the air inlet 11. This arrangement of the LP turbine 21 and the LP compressor 22 provides for a reverse-flow engine 10 that has one or more LP compressor stages located at the rear of the engine 10, and which are driven by one or more low pressure turbine stages located at the front of the engine 10.
The LP spool 20 further comprises an LP shaft 23 (also known as a power shaft) coaxial with the center axis 17 of the engine 10. The LP turbine 21 is drivingly connected to the LP shaft 23. The LP shaft 23 allows the LP turbine 21 to drive the LP compressor 22 during operation of the engine 10. As will be discussed in greater details hereinbelow, the LP shaft 23 may be drivingly connected to the LP compressor 22 via a gear train to allow the LP compressor 22 to run at a different rotational speed from the LP turbine 21. This can provide more flexibility in the selection of design points for the LP compressor 22 while at the same time allowing to drivingly connect an axially mounted accessory gear box (AGB) to the HP spool 40 centrally through the LP compressor 22, thereby minimizing the engine envelope in a direction radial from the engine axis 17.
It is understood that the LP shaft 23 is not limited to the configuration depicted in
Still referring to
The RGB 31 processes and outputs the rotational drive transferred thereto from the LP turbine 21 via the LP shaft 23 through known gear reduction techniques. The RGB 31 allows for the load (e.g. the propeller according to the illustrated turboprop example) to be driven at its optimal rotational speed, which is different from the rotational speed of the LP turbine 21. The RGB 31 is axially mounted at the front end of the engine. The RGB 31 has an input and an output axis parallel (coaxial in the illustrated embodiment) to the central axis 17 of the engine 10.
In an alternate embodiment where the engine 10 is a turboshaft, the rotational load (which may include, but is not limited to, helicopter main rotor(s) and/or tail rotor(s), propeller(s) for a tilt-rotor aircraft, pump(s), generator(s), gas compressor(s), marine propeller(s), etc.) is driven by the LP turbine 21 via the RGB 31, or the RGB 31 may be omitted such that the output of the engine 10 is provided directly by the LP shaft 23.
The LP shaft 23 with the portions thereof extending forward and aft of the LP turbine 21 provides the engine 10 with bidirectional drive. Modularity criteria for gas turbine engines may require the use of distinct shaft sections in opposed axial directions from the LP turbine 21. The LP shaft sections may be directly or indirectly connected together. Alternately, the LP shaft 23 can be integral with a first segment of the LP shaft extending axially between the LP compressor 22 and the LP turbine 21, and a second segment extending between the rotatable load and the LP turbine 21. Whether the LP shaft 23 is integral or segmented, the LP turbine 21 provides rotational drive outputted at each end of the LP shaft 23.
In light of the preceding, it can be appreciated that the LP turbine 21 drives both the rotatable load and the LP compressor 22. Furthermore, the rotatable load, when mounted to the engine 10, and the LP compressor 22 are disposed on opposite ends of the LP turbine 21. It can thus be appreciated that one or more low pressure turbine stages are used to drive elements in front of the LP turbine (e.g. propeller, RGB 31, etc.) as well as to drive elements to the rear of the LP turbine (e.g. LP compressor 22). This configuration of the LP turbine 21 allows it to simultaneously drive the rotatable load and the LP compressor 22.
Still referring to
In the illustrated reverse flow engine configuration, the HP turbine 41 is aft of the LP turbine 21, and forward of the combustor 13. The HP compressor 42 is aft of the combustor 13, and forward of the LP compressor 22. From this arrangement of the HP turbine 41 and the HP compressor 42, it can be appreciated that during operation of the engine 10, the LP compressor 22 driven by the LP turbine 21 feeds pressurized air to the HP compressor 42. Therefore, the pressurized air flow produced by the LP compressor 22 is provided to the HP compressor 42 and contributes to the work of both the LP turbine 21 and the HP turbine 41. This arrangement provides for a boosted reverse flow engine.
It can thus be appreciated that the presence of the above-described LP and HP spools 20, 40 provides the engine 10 with a “split compressor” arrangement. More particularly, some of the work required to compress the incoming air is transferred from the HP compressor 42 to the LP compressor 22. In other words, some of the compression work is transferred from the HP turbine 41 to the more efficient LP turbine 21. This transfer of work may contribute to higher pressure ratios while maintaining a relatively small number of rotors. In a particular embodiment, higher pressure ratios allow for higher power density, better engine specific fuel consumption (SFC), and a lower turbine inlet temperature (sometimes referred to as “T4”) for a given power. These factors can contribute to a lower overall weight for the engine 10. The transfer of compression work from the HP compressor 42 to the LP compressor 22 contrasts with some conventional reverse-flow engines, in which the high pressure compressor (and thus the high pressure turbine) perform all of the compression work.
In light of the preceding, it can be appreciated that the LP turbine 21 is the “low-speed” and “low pressure” turbine section when compared to the HP turbine 41. The LP turbine 21 is sometimes referred to as the “power turbine”. The turbine rotors of the HP turbine 41 spin at a higher rotational speed than the turbine rotors of the LP turbine 21 given the closer proximity of the HP turbine 41 to the outlet of the combustor 13. Consequently, the compressor rotors of the HP compressor 42 may rotate at a higher rotational speed than the compressor rotors of the LP compressor 22.
The HP turbine 41 and the HP compressor 42 can have any suitable mechanical arrangement to achieve the above-described split compressor functionality. For example, and as shown in
Still referring to the embodiment shown in
According to the illustrated embodiment, the AGB 50 is concentrically mounted axially aft of the LP compressor 22 as an axial extension of the engine envelope. The axial positioning of the AGB 50 allows minimizing the overall radial envelope of the engine as compared to a split compressor or boosted engine having the AGB mounted on a side of the engine and connected to the HP spool via a tower shaft. In the illustrated embodiment, the AGB is accommodated within the envelope of the engine in a plane normal to the central axis 17.
In the illustrated embodiment, the AGB input drive axis is coaxial to the LP compressor centerline and the engine central axis 17. By so aligning the input axis of the AGB 50 relative to the LP compressor centerline, the drive input to the AGB 50 can be provided centrally through the center of the LP compressor 22, thereby eliminating the need for a tower shaft and an externally mounted gear arrangement. However, unlike conventional reverse flow engines (like the well-known PT6 engine manufactured by Pratt & Whitney Canada), which do not include a compressor boost, the presence of the LP compressor 22 axially between the HP compressor 42 and the AGB 50 physically interferes with the connection of the AGB 50 with the HP spool 40. In the illustrated embodiment, this particular problem is overcome by passing the input drive shaft 52 of the AGB 50 centrally through the LP compressor 22. As best shown in
According to the illustrated embodiment, the second gear train 66 comprises a geared shaft 68 comprising a first gear 70 in meshing engagement with a corresponding gear 72 at the rear end of the LP shaft 23 and a second gear 74 in meshing engagement with a corresponding gear 76 on a hub portion projecting axially forwardly from the LP compressor 22. As mentioned herein above, the gear connection between the LP turbine 21 and the LP compressor 22 is also advantageous in that it allows to drive the LP compressor at a different speed than the LP turbine. It can thus allow for overall thermodynamic cycle performance improvement.
According to the illustrated embodiment, the first and second gear trains 54 and 66 are contained in a central cavity 80 radially inwardly of the gaspath 18 axially between the HP and LP compressors 42 and 22. The central cavity 80 is bounded by the compressor inner gaspath wall 82. This provides for a compact arrangement.
It is understood that the first and second gear trains 54, 66 could adopt various configurations. The configuration illustrated in
Also according to a non-illustrated alternative, the HP shaft 43 could extend centrally through the LP compressor 22 directly into the AGB 50. In this embodiment, the AGB input shaft 52 could be viewed as part of the HP shaft 43. The end of the HP shaft 43 would carry a gear in meshing engagement with a corresponding gear at the AGB input end. According to such an embodiment, the LP shaft 23 could also be extended axially rearwardly through the LP compressor 22 and the gear train between the LP shaft 23 and the LP compressor 22 could be provided within the AGB 50 aft of the LP compressor 22.
It can thus be appreciated that at least some of the embodiments of the engine 10 disclosed herein provide a mechanical architecture of turbomachinery that allows for a split compressor system in a compact PT6 type configuration. Such a split compressor engine in a reverse flow or through flow configuration may be used for aircraft nose installations, as well as for wing installations.
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. Modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the appended claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application Nos. 62/363,956, filed Jul. 19, 2016, 62/363,955, filed Jul. 19, 2016; 62/363,952 filed Jul. 19, 2016; 62/363,949 filed Jul. 19, 2016; 62/363,947 filed Jul. 19, 2016 and U.S. application Ser. No. 15/266,321 filed Sep. 15, 2016, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2548975 | Hawthorne | Apr 1951 | A |
2747367 | Savin | May 1956 | A |
2929207 | Peterson | Mar 1960 | A |
2955424 | Hryniszak | Oct 1960 | A |
2984977 | Embree | May 1961 | A |
3152443 | Newland | Oct 1964 | A |
3170292 | Howes | Feb 1965 | A |
3204406 | Howes | Sep 1965 | A |
3209536 | Howes | Oct 1965 | A |
3255825 | Mouille et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
3488947 | Miller | Jan 1970 | A |
3529419 | Reed | Sep 1970 | A |
3762161 | Pennig | Oct 1973 | A |
3874811 | Dennison | Apr 1975 | A |
4030288 | Davis | Jun 1977 | A |
4055949 | Boudigues | Nov 1977 | A |
4141212 | Koschier | Feb 1979 | A |
4251987 | Adamson | Feb 1981 | A |
4498291 | Jefferey | Feb 1985 | A |
4531694 | Soloy | Jul 1985 | A |
4611464 | Hetzer | Sep 1986 | A |
4685286 | Hetzer et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4744214 | Monsarrat | May 1988 | A |
4765135 | Lardellier | Aug 1988 | A |
4815282 | Wilkinson et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4817382 | Rudolph et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4864812 | Rodgers | Sep 1989 | A |
4934140 | Dennison | Jun 1990 | A |
5119624 | McKenna | Jun 1992 | A |
5159808 | Kast | Nov 1992 | A |
5161364 | Bruun | Nov 1992 | A |
5220784 | Wilcox | Jun 1993 | A |
5309708 | Stewart | May 1994 | A |
5473883 | Naudet | Dec 1995 | A |
6041589 | Giffin, III et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6082967 | Loisy | Jul 2000 | A |
6247668 | Reysa | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6606863 | Napier | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6735954 | MacFarlane et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6855089 | Poulin | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865891 | Walsh et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6895741 | Rago et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6901759 | Frutschi | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7055303 | Macfarlane et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7144349 | Mitrovic | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7168913 | Lardellier | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7500365 | Suciu et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7552591 | Bart | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7690185 | Linet et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698884 | Maguire et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707909 | Linet et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7758302 | Linet et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762084 | Martis | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8176725 | Norris | May 2012 | B2 |
8209952 | Ress, Jr. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8220245 | Papandreas | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8350398 | Butt | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8459038 | Lickfold et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8464511 | Ribarov et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8500583 | Goi et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8516789 | Kupratis | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8568089 | Lemmers, Jr. et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8621871 | McCune et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8689538 | Sankrithi | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8794922 | Bart et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8845292 | Lafont | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8853878 | White | Oct 2014 | B1 |
9062611 | Sheridan | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9126691 | Cloft | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9145834 | Frost et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9239004 | Kupratis | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9297305 | Drachsler et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9322341 | Belleville | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9328667 | MacFarlane | May 2016 | B2 |
9341121 | Kupratis | May 2016 | B2 |
9353848 | Blewett et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9512784 | Morgan et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9828911 | Burghardt | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9719465 | Suciu | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9745860 | Haskin | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9752500 | Ullyott | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9752610 | Rousseau | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9784182 | Dhanuka | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9819292 | Thatcher | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9890704 | Speak et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9926849 | Frost et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9932858 | Miller | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10054001 | Beutin et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10072570 | Kupratis | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10094295 | Ullyott et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10125722 | Kupratis | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10132198 | Baba | Nov 2018 | B2 |
20030051483 | Napier | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040065091 | Anderson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050060983 | Lardellier | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060010152 | Catalano | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060137355 | Welch et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070022735 | Henry | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070240427 | Ullyott | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080081733 | Hattenbach | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080138195 | Kern | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148881 | Moniz et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090015011 | Colin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090188334 | Merry | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090288421 | Zeiner | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090322088 | Dooley | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100164234 | Bowman | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100180568 | Sachs | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100212285 | Negulesou | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100281875 | Price | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110056183 | Sankrithi | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110056208 | Norris | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110171030 | Swift | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110284328 | Brandt | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130031912 | Finney | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130056982 | Gozdawa | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130098066 | Gallet | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20120121417 | Lafont | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130139518 | Morgan | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130145769 | Norris | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130186058 | Sheridan | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130255224 | Kupratis | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140069107 | Macfarlane | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140130352 | Buldtmann et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140150401 | Venter | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140250862 | Suciu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140252160 | Suciu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140255147 | Root | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140256494 | Lewis | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140260295 | Ullyott | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140290265 | Ullyott et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140297155 | Chen | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150013307 | Burghardt | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150167549 | Ribarov | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150292544 | Rousseau | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150337738 | Suciu | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150369123 | Hanrahan | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150377125 | Kupratis | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160040601 | Frost | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160090871 | Olsen | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160169118 | Duoung | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160201490 | Scott | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160208690 | Zimmitti | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160215694 | Brostmeyer | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160230843 | Duong et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160245185 | Lamarre et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160290226 | Roberge | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160305261 | Orosa | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160319845 | Molnar | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160333791 | Snyder et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160341214 | O'Toole | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160363055 | Edwards | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170108084 | Chmylkowski | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170122122 | Lepretre | May 2017 | A1 |
20170191381 | Baba | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170211477 | Menheere | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170211484 | Sheridan | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170306841 | Skertic | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170314469 | Roever | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170314474 | Wotzak | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170327241 | Mitrovic | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170356347 | Scothern et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170356452 | Mastro | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170370284 | Harvey | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180016989 | Abe | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180023481 | Lefebvre | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180023482 | Lefebvre | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180045068 | Brinson et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180058330 | Munevar | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180073428 | Morgan | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180073429 | Dubreuil | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180073438 | Durocher et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180135522 | Mitrovic et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180149091 | Howell et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180163640 | Dubreuil et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180171815 | Suciu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180172012 | Plante et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180202310 | Suciu et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180202368 | Suciu et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180208322 | Tantot | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180216525 | Plante et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180223739 | Dubreuil et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180283281 | Veilleux, Jr. et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180291817 | Suciu et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180313274 | Suciu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180347471 | Wotzak | Dec 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2562290 | Oct 2013 | CA |
2970386 | Jan 2018 | CA |
2970389 | Jan 2018 | CA |
2975558 | Jun 2018 | CA |
0103370 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0860593 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1908938 | Apr 2004 | EP |
2226487 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2295763 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2295763 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2320067 | May 2011 | EP |
1959114 | May 2012 | EP |
2728140 | May 2014 | EP |
2728140 | May 2014 | EP |
3032073 | Jun 2016 | EP |
3043056 | Jul 2016 | EP |
3273031 | Jan 2018 | EP |
3273034 | Jan 2018 | EP |
3273032 | Apr 2018 | EP |
3309371 | Apr 2018 | EP |
991975 | Oct 1951 | FR |
1262452 | May 1961 | FR |
1594317 | Jun 1970 | FR |
713839 | Aug 1954 | GB |
1102591 | Feb 1968 | GB |
WO9502120 | Jan 1995 | WO |
2005061873 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO200845068 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO201533336 | Mar 2015 | WO |
20150122948 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO2015122948 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO2017198999 | Nov 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report in relating EP application No. 18154161.6. |
European Search Report dated May 25, 2018 in related EP application No. 17191309.8. |
European Search Report dated May 25, 2018 in related EP application No. 17186249.3. |
European Search Report dated Nov. 30, 2017 in counterpart EP application No. 17182102.8. |
European Search Report dated Dec. 12, 2017 in related EP application No. 17182076.4. |
European Search Report dated Dec. 12, 2017 in related EP application No. 17182096.2. |
European Search Report dated Jan. 31, 2018 in related EP application No. 17185796.4. |
A New Approach to Turboshaft Engine Growth, M. A. Compagnon, General Electric Company, Lynn,Massachusetts pp. 80-41-1 to 80-41-6, May 13, 1980. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/384,959, filed Dec. 20, 2016. |
European Search Report dated Mar. 19, 2018 in related EP application No. 17182087.1. |
European Search Report dated Mar. 21, 2018 in related EP application No. 17182094.7. |
European Search Report dated Apr. 6, 2018 in related EP application No. 17193893.9. |
United Training Corp., PT6 Descriptive Course and Guide to Troubleshooting, Dec. 2016, Pub: United Training Corp., pp. 1-6 (Year: 2016). |
Flight International, PT6: Turboprop Phenomenon, Jan. 31-Feb. 6, 1990, Reed Business Publishing Ltd, pp. 32-36. (Year: 1990). |
Guy Norris, GE Takes on PT6 Engine With Advanced Turboprop, Nov. 17, 2015, Aviation Week Intelligence Network, pp. 1-3 (Year: 2015). |
European Search Report issued in corresponding EP application No. 19193794.5 dated Jan. 3, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180023480 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62363956 | Jul 2016 | US | |
62363955 | Jul 2016 | US | |
62363952 | Jul 2016 | US | |
62363949 | Jul 2016 | US | |
62363947 | Jul 2016 | US |