1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a multi-stack optical data storage medium for recording using a focused radiation beam having a wavelength λ and entering through an entrance face of the medium during recording, comprising:
a first substrate having, on a side thereof:
a first L0 guide groove formed therein, and
a first recording stack L0 comprising a recordable type L0 recording layer, the L0 recording layer having a thickness dL0G in the groove and a thickness dL0L adjacent the groove, and a first reflective layer present between the L0 recording layer and the first substrate;
a second substrate having, on a side thereof:
a second L1 guide groove formed therein, and
a second recording stack L1 comprising a recordable type L1 recording layer, the L1 recording layer having a thickness dL1G in the groove and a thickness dL1L adjacent the groove, said second recording stack being present at a position closer to the entrance face than the L0 recording stack; and
a transparent spacer layer sandwiched between the recording stacks, said transparent spacer layer having a thickness substantially larger than the depth of focus of the focused radiation beam.
The invention also relates to the use of such a medium.
2. Description of the Related Art
An embodiment of an optical recording medium as described in the opening paragraph is known from European Patent Application EP1067535A2, corresponding to U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0063295. The most common embodiment of the medium is a circular disk.
Regarding the market for optical recording, it is clear that the most important and successful format so far is a write-once format, Compact Disk Recordable (CD-R). Although the take-over in importance by Compact Disk ReWritable (CD-RW) has been predicted since a long time, the actual market size of CD-R media is still at least an order of magnitude larger than for CD-RW. Furthermore, the most important parameter for drives is the maximum write speed for R-media, not for RW. Of course, a possible shift of the market to CD-RW is still possible, e.g., because of Mount Rainier standardization for CD-RW. However, the R-format has been proven very attractive due to its 100% compatibility with read-only compact disk (CD).
Recently, the Digital Versatile Disk (DVD) has gained marketshare as a medium with a much higher data storage capacity than the CD. Presently, this format is available in a read only (ROM) and a rewritable (RW) version. Next to the DVD ReWritable (DVD+RW) standard, a new recordable (R), i.e., write once, DVD+R standard was developed. The new DVD+R standard gets increasing attention as an important support for DVD+RW. A possible scenario is that the end customers have become so familiar with an optical write-once format that they might accept it more easily than a re-writable format.
An issue for both the R and RW formats is the limited capacity, and therefore recording time, because only single-stacked media are present. Note that for DVD-Video, which is a ROM disk, dual-layer media already have a considerable market share. A dual-layer, i.e., dual-stack, DVD+RW disk is probably feasible. However, it has become clear that a fully compatible disk, i.e., within the reflection and modulation specification of the dual-layer DVD-ROM, is very difficult to achieve and requires at least a major breakthrough for the properties of the amorphous/crystalline phase-change materials, which are used as recording layers in, e.g., DVD+RW media. Without a full compatibility, the success of a dual-layer DVD+RW in the market is questionable.
In order to obtain a dual-layer DVD+R medium which is compatible with the dual-layer DVD-ROM standard, the effective reflectivity of both the upper L1 layer and the lower L0 layer should be at least 18%. The term “effective” means that the reflection is measured as the portion of effective light coming back from the medium when both stacks L0 and L1 are present and focusing on L0 and L1, respectively. This implies that the L0 stack as such requires a far higher reflection level of, e.g., more than 50%, preferably more than 60%, because the L1 stack absorbs a substantial portion of the incoming and outgoing light. It should be noted that in this document, the normally used convention of notation of L0 and L1, in which notation L0 is the “closest” stack, i.e., closest to the radiation beam entrance face, has been changed: L0 now is the deepest stack and L1 . . . Ln are stacks closer to the radiation beam entrance face. In EP1067535A2, the following definitions are used: dG1 (corresponding to dL1G in this document) is the thickness of the dye layer in a groove of the first or top information recording/reproduction unit which corresponds to L1, dG2 (corresponding to dL0G in this document) is the thickness of the dye layer in a groove of the second information recording/reproduction unit which corresponds to L0. dL1 (corresponding to dL1L in this document) is the thickness of the dye layer on a land corresponding to L1, dL2 (corresponding to dL0L in this document) is the thickness of the dye layer on a land corresponding to L0. The depth of the grooves corresponding to L1 is d1 but the depth of the grooves d2 corresponding to L0 is defined differently. d2 is the height difference of lands and grooves measured on the dye surface after a dye layer has been coated. dG2, d2 and dL2 are set to approximately 174, 140 and 120 nm. A calculation shows that this corresponds to a groove depth g in the substrate corresponding to L0 of about 194 nm. Measurements by applicants have shown that the inverted L0 stack of the known medium with grooves with a depth of 194 nm has a reflectivity of only 15%-50% of the reflectivity of blank areas (i.e., without grooves). This means that it is impossible to reach the desired 60% reflection level because in order to obtain a dual-layer DVD+R medium which is compatible with the dual-layer DVD-ROM standard, the reflectivity of a light beam focused onto the data track of the lower L0 layer should be sufficiently high (typically >60%, depending on the transmission of the upper L1 layer). From a dual-stack DVD+R production point of view, an inverted L0 layer structure is preferred which means that the recording layer of the L0 stack is present at a side of the reflective layer other than the side of the substrate with groove structure. In EP1067535A2, it is proposed to that dG1 is substantially equal to dG2 and that dL1 is substantially equal to dL2. Furthermore dG1 should be larger than dL1, whereas dG2 should be larger than dL2.
It is an object of the invention to provide an optical data storage medium of the type mentioned in the opening paragraph which has a reflection level of the L0 stack and a modulation level of recorded marks in the recording layer of the L0 recording stack which is compatible with the dual-layer DVD-ROM specification.
This object is achieved in accordance with the invention by an optical storage medium, characterized in that the depth of the first L0 guide groove is smaller than 0.15λ and that dL0L is substantially equal to or larger than dL1G. Shallow grooves are proposed in order to achieve a high reflection value of the L0 stack. According to calculations, grooves deeper than 0.3λ may also achieve a high reflection but are more difficult to manufacture from the point of view of mastering and injection molding. The explanation for the reduced reflection above 0.15λ may be that grooves covered with metal act as a waveguide for the radiation beam, thereby lowering the effective reflectivity due to optical effects. At depths >0.3λ, these effects may again lead to an increase of the reflection. Since the L0 stack is recorded on land, i.e., in between the L0 guide groove generally formed as a spiral, it is required that the thickness dL0L is at least substantially equal to the thickness dL1G. This is because applicants have had the insight that a minimum amount of dye thickness is required in order to have marks recorded which have sufficient modulation. Modulation is defined as the difference of the values of reflection of unrecorded and recorded marks divided by the value of maximum reflection. During recording, the optical properties of the recording layer, e.g., a dye material, are changed due to an increase in temperature. Sufficient modulation can only be obtained if the change in refractive index of the dye (Δndye) times the thickness of the dye, i.e., Δndye×dL0L, is sufficiently large. If dL1G is chosen such that a modulation of at least 60%, as required by the DVD-ROM specification, is obtained in recording layer L1, experiments have indicated that a modulation of at least 60% in recording layer L0 can only be reached if dL0L is at least equal to or larger than dL1G. Usually the recording layer, e.g., a dye, is deposited using spin coating technique, and therefore, when dL0G is made substantially equal to dL1G, dL0L will be smaller than dL1G because the lands of L0 will have a shallower recording layer than the adjacent grooves of L0. When dL0L is substantially equal to or larger than dL1G, this effect is compensated for and a sufficient modulation level of the marks in the L0 recording layer is achieved combined with a high maximum reflection level. The wavelength λ of the radiation beam is substantially 655 nm (DVD) or smaller for future formats.
In an embodiment, dL0G is substantially equal to or larger than 2dL1L. When using an L0 guide groove depth of about ⅕ of the L1 guide groove depth, a relatively high reflection value of the L0 stack is achieved. The L0 stack is recorded on-land (as opposed to in-groove) in order to obtain the proper sign of the modulation (high-to-low recording). This has an additional advantage that the push-pull guide groove tracking signal has the proper sign (“on-land”). The parameter L is defined as:
L=(dG−dL)/G
in which dG is the recording layer thickness in the groove, dL is the recording layer thickness on land and G is the groove depth. This parameter is a measure for the leveling out of the recording layer after depositing on the groove structure. Normally, when having relatively deep guide grooves of 100 nm or more and the recording layer is deposited by spin coating, typically the leveling is between about 0.2 and 0.5. L=0 means that dG=dL and L=1 means that the top surface of the dye is completely flat after depositing on the guide groove structure. But when using a relatively shallow L0 guide groove, a leveling factor of L=1 or close hereto may be assumed. In this case, when dL0G is substantially equal to or larger than 2dL1L, relatively good recording results are achieved.
In another embodiment, the recordable type L0 and L1 recording layers comprise an organic dye. In a preferred embodiment, dL1G is larger than dL1L. When using spin coating for depositing the dye of the L1 recording layer, the grooves will have a thicker recording layer than the adjacent lands. This is advantageous for the recording behavior of the L1 recording layer because in organic dye based recording, the recording process is optimal when the dye volume, in which the data, i.e., marks, are recorded, is confined within the guide grooves present on the surface of the substrate.
In an embodiment, a dielectric layer may be present at a side of the L0 recording layer opposite from the side where the first reflective layer is present. This has the advantage of even a better modulation. The dielectric layer preferably has a thickness in the range of 5 nm-120 nm.
In yet another embodiment, a second reflective layer comprising a metal is present at a side of the L0 recording layer opposite from the side where the first reflective layer is present. Preferably, the second reflective layer has a thickness in the range of 5 nm-15 nm. The second reflective layer preferably mainly comprises a metal selected from the group of Ag, Au and Cu. The second reflective layer has the advantage of an even higher reflection of the L0 stack. Small variations in stack design may be required to reach a good recording performance.
An additional advantage of the use of shallow grooves in an inverted L0 stack is that a wobble of the guide groove is less visible in the reflection of the radiation beam. A wobble is used to modulate additional information in the guide groove, e.g., an address or time signal. When, e.g., using a guide groove with a depth GL0 of 160 nm, a variation of 15% is visible in the signal with the same periodicity as the wobble. At a groove depth GL0 of 35 nm this variation is substantially absent.
The invention will be elucidated in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
a and 4b show the calculated result of a modeling study of a stack design according to the invention;
a and 5b show the calculated result of a modeling study of another stack design according to the invention; and
In
In
In
L1:dL1G=80 nm,
dL1L=30 nm dye/12 nm Ag/UV curable resin(protective layer)
L1 guide groove depth 160 nm;
L0100 nm (ZnS)80(SiO2)20/dL0L=120 nm,
dLOG=150 nm dye/100 nm AG,
L0 guide groove depth 30 nm; and a spacer thickness of 50 μm. The effective reflection from L1 is about 19%, effective reflection (measured through L1) from L0 is about 19%.
The upper L1 stack of a recordable dual-stack DVD disk should have high transparency in order to be able to address the lower lying L0 stack. At the same time, L1 preferably should have a reflectivity of at least 18% in order to meet the dual layer DVD-ROM specification. The stacks proposed here are not restricted to use in DVD+R-Dl and can be applied in any (multi-stack) organic-dye based optical recording medium.
In
Stack 1
30 to 40 nm deep guide grooves in substrate 31a,
an optically closed Ag first reflective layer 39 of 100 nm. Other metals, e.g., Au, Cu or Al, may be used as well,
an azo dye layer, with thickness of 130 nm on land, the refractive index of the dye at a radiation beam wavelength of 655 nm is 2.24-0.02 i which corresponds to a typical DVD-R dye,
80 to 120 nm (ZnS)80(SiO2)20, other dielectrics with n˜2.1 give identical results.
This design combines a high reflectivity and a high modulation of the inverted L0 recording stack for the case of shallow grooves. The stacks should be recorded on-land (as opposed to in-groove) in order to obtain the proper sign of the modulation (high-to-low recording). This has an additional advantage that the push-pull signal has the proper sign (“on-land”). The definition of parameter L is described earlier.
In
In
Experimental results obtained with this stack 1 are: A high modulation of 75% and a higher reflection level of 61%. Modulation is generally defined as (Rmark-Rno-mark)/Rmax in which formulate Rmark and Rno-mark are the reflection levels from the read out laser beam when, respectively, a written mark and no mark is present and Rmax is the maximum reflection. The laser beam power required to write in the L0 layer is only 7 mW, which is favorable in view of the presence of the L1 stack because a relatively large portion of the power will be absorbed in the L1 stack.
In
Stack 2
30 to 40 nm deep guide grooves in substrate 31a,
an optically closed Ag reflective layer 39 of 100 nm, other metals, e.g., Au, Cu or Al, may be used as well,
an azo dye layer, thickness 100 to 130 nm on land, the refractive index of the dye at a radiation beam wavelength of 655 nm is 2.24-0.02 i which corresponds to a typical DVD-R dye,
a 5 to 15 nm second reflective layer of Ag, other metals, e.g., Au or Cu, may be used as well.
Experimental results obtained with this stack 2 are: A high modulation of 75% and a high reflection level of 64%. The laser beam power required to write in the L0 layer is only 7 mW, which is favorable in view of the presence of the L1 stack because a relatively large portion of the power will be absorbed in the L1 stack.
A third stack design is possible which is not shown in a drawings but is described here:
Stack 3
30 to 40 nm deep guide grooves in substrate 1a,
an optically closed Ag reflective layer 39 of 100 nm, other metals, e.g., Au, Cu or Al, may be used as well,
an azo dye layer 35, thickness 90 nm to 160 nm on land, the refractive index of the dye at a radiation beam wavelength of 655 nm is 2.24-0.02 i which corresponds to a typical DVD-R dye,
a 5 to 50 nm layer of SiO2, other dielectrics may be used as well.
The advantage of this third stack design is that it is more easy to manufacture compared to the second stack design.
In
Both stack designs of
It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiment illustrates rather than limits the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be able to design many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claim. The word “comprising” does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those listed in a claim. The word “a” or “an” preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
According to the invention a multi-stack optical data storage medium for recording using a focused radiation beam having a wavelength λ and entering through an entrance face of the medium is described. It has a first substrate having, on a side thereof, a first L0 guide groove formed therein, and a first recording stack L0, comprising a recordable type L0 recording layer. The L0 recording layer has a thickness dL0G in the groove and a thickness dL0L adjacent the groove, and a first reflective layer present between the L0 recording layer and the first substrate. A second substrate has, on a side thereof, a second L1 guide groove formed therein, and a second recording stack L1 comprising a recordable type L1 recording layer. The L1 recording layer has a thickness dL1G in the groove and a thickness dL1L adjacent the groove. The second recording stack is present at a position closer to the entrance face than the L0 recording stack. The depth of the first L0 guide groove is smaller than 0.15λ and dL0L is substantially equal to or larger than dL1G, by which it is achieved that the L0 stack has a reflection level and a modulation level of recorded marks compatible with the dual layer DVD-ROM specification.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
02078573 | Aug 2002 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB03/03760 | 8/14/2003 | WO | 00 | 2/23/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/021336 | 3/11/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5745475 | Ohno et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5764619 | Nishiuchi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6667947 | Maeda et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6709801 | Miyamoto et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6728198 | Fujii et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
20030185143 | Lin et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1067535 | Jan 2001 | EP |
10675335 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1067535 | Jan 2002 | EP |
2002279707 | Sep 2002 | JP |
WO9631875 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO9631875 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 2004107329 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050223402 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |