The present invention generally relates to liquid blending systems and methods and, more particularly, to a system that accurately blends two or more liquids together so that solutions having the desired concentrations of components and/or other characteristics, such as pH, conductivity, organic composition, viscosity or optical properties, etc. are created.
A prior art multi-stage accurate blending system and method is illustrated in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 8,271,139 to Bellafiore et al. While the system of the '139 patent performs well and is largely accurate for the purpose and functionality of blending two or more liquids together so that solutions having the desired concentrations of components and/or other characteristics may be created, the hold-up volume of the mixing loop (including sensors in loop) of the '139 patent suffers from a number of disadvantages. These disadvantages include the following:
1) impeding rapid change to the blending solutions (through exponential dilution of the mixing loop volume) thus extending the time to bring the blend products into specification and thereby negatively impacting the efficiency of the system by extending the product to waste,
2) making the system difficult/complicated to accomplish tuning over a broad range of flow (impeding user friendliness),
3) subjecting the sensors to a high flow regime where otherwise calmer conditions would be a benefit to the instrumentation (according to the instrument manufacturers) and allow smaller flow cells to reduce system volume,
4) difficult to eject bubbles that would (from time to time) become entrained in the mixing loop and were likewise subject to exponential dilution,
5) difficult to fill mixing loop upon startup due to the conflict between high point to remove air and drain angle to drain liquid,
6) the connection of the pH tempering liquid to the high flow regime of the mixing loop (although it proves to work well for introducing pH tempering liquids) requires excessive backpressure at the outlet of the skid to stay flow-through of the pH tempering pump (due to venture effects) which in turn make it difficult to prime the pumps including the buffer pump on the current skid,
7) a bubbletrap is required where degassing of liquids is present (when blending organics). In the system of the '139 patent, the bubbletrap would have to be in the mixing loop with the sensors which is ineffective for removing bubbles (due to low residence time)—the sensors should be at the low flow regime before the sensors, and
8) the mixing loop is not scalable to the smaller systems because of lack of suitable centrifugal pump components.
A schematic of an embodiment of the system of the present invention is provided in
With reference to
With reference to
As illustrated in
Automated valves providing adjustable flow rates may be substituted for some or all of the pumps 12, 14 and 16. Indeed, whether pumps or valves are used in the system to perform the metering/dosing is dependent on the application and the user's facility setup.
At start-up, pumps 12, 14 and 16 are activated by controller 18 so that solution containing salt concentrate and water and an acid/base modifier solution are pumped to the shear blender 22 and mixed therein. A purge valve 28 and a delivery valve 32 are closed, while waste valve 33 is open. As a result, solution initially exits the system through waste port 35 so that it may be dumped or directed to a container for recirculation.
Downstream of the shear blender 22 are conductivity sensors 26a and 26b and pH sensor 36.
The conductivity of the solution exiting the shear blender is detected by conductivity sensor(s) 26a and/or 26b and the total flow of the system is detected by flow transmitter 39. As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Only when the target pH and conductivity levels have been attained will the delivery valve 32 open and waste valve 33 close via controller 18 to deliver the output of the process through outlet or product port 38. The liquid traveling through outlet port 38 can be delivered to an existing process or system. The system 10 can be connected to an existing system by means of a single tubing connection or alternatively can be used in a stand-alone way to generate adaptively-controlled liquid blends.
In both the system of
If the pH sensor 36 and/or the conductivity sensor 26 detect(s) that the solution exiting the shear blender 22 has gone out of spec, controller 18 opens waste valve 33 so that the solution is pumped out through purge line 35 so that it may be dumped or directed to a container for recirculation.
As another non-limiting example, the system of
At start-up, pumps 12, 14 and 16 are activated by controller 18 so that solution containing salt concentrate, water and alcohol flows to shear blender 22 and are mixed therein. Purge valve 28 and delivery valve 32 are closed, while waste valve 33 is open.
As noted previously, downstream of the shear blender 22 are conductivity sensors 26a and 26b, In addition, in the place of the pH sensor 36 is a near-infrared (NIR) sensor, illustrated in phantom at 136 in
The conductivity of the solution exiting shear blender 22 is detected by conductivity sensors 26(a) and/or 26(b). As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Only when the target conductivity and alcohol concentration levels have been attained will the delivery valve 32 open and waste valve 33 close via controller 18 to deliver the output of the process through outlet or product port 38. The salt concentrate solution and alcohol addition rates continue to be based on feedback control from the conductivity sensor(s) 26a and/or 26b and NIR sensor 136.
In both of the above examples, the system of
Sensors other than a conductivity sensor, pH sensor or NIR sensor could be used as the sensors illustrated in
In addition, other analytical method(s) may be performed by embodiments of the invention. These include, but are not limited to optical methods such as refractive index (RI). In addition to RI, optical density, UV sensors, turbidity, color sensors, light scattering, etc. may be used.
A “shear blender” is typically used for grinding solids into fine granules which get entrained/homogenized in an externally forced flowing liquid (the blender is not a pump, it is a grinder which requires the solids and liquids to be pushed through it). By unintended design, the cavities between the rotating rings (of the grinder) entrains liquids and moves them in a circle where they are swept by flow through the grinder to transfer (randomly) into a stationary ring and there again swept into a rotating ring to be swept again into a stationary ring several times (5 rings in new design). There is an intense mixing effect at the transition from rotating ring to stationary ring (and vice versa) and a homogenizing effect from the random distribution of liquid from the rotating ring to the stationary ring, creating an excellent liquid mixing device which gives equivalent to better mixing results as compared to a mixing loop, and addresses the problems listed in the Background section above. More specifically, use of the shear blender provides the following advantages over use of a mixing loop:
1) changes the placement of the sensors and potential bubbletrap to downstream of the mixing device (low flow regime).
2) reduces the hold-up volume of the mixer and thereby improves the response, efficiency and tune ability of the system over a broad flow range.
3) brings the pH tempering solution to the common buffer inlet thereby eliminating the venture effect, requiring less backpressure on the system which improves priming of pump.
4) has a flow through configuration which expels air from the top and a drain at the bottom.
5) is scalable in that smaller (laboratory) versions of this device are available.
An example of a suitable shear blender 22 for use in the embodiment of
The shear blender preferably has a variable frequency drive which may provide advantages due to normalizing the tip speed (based on rpm for fixed rotor diameter) to system flow rate.
While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined by the appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/814,647, filed on Apr. 22, 2013, the contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61814647 | Apr 2013 | US |