The field of the invention is multi-stage fracturing where ports are sequentially opened as the borehole below is isolated so that high pressure fluid can be directed to the formation to initiate fractures and more particularly to methods and devices that permit a full bore for subsequent production and remediation.
In typical multi-stage fractures progressively larger balls are landed on a series of ball seats going in a direction from downhole to uphole. The dropped or pumped ball finds its respective seat and pressure that is built up on the seated ball shifts a sliding sleeve to open an adjacent wall port. With the borehole below isolated by the seated ball the fracking through the open port can begin. When the fracking through that port is completed another and slightly larger ball is dropped onto the next ball seat up which effectively isolates the open port below and the process is repeated in stages until the zone is completed. One issue with these systems is that the borehole tubulars can only accept so many different sized balls that have to be stored at the surface very carefully to be sure they get dropped in the right order. Another issue is that the presence of all the ball seats is a flow obstruction to later production. Of course the balls could be allowed to come back to the surface with production but the ball seats remain behind. Another approach would be to mill out the balls and seats before producing but that produces debris that has to be removed and is expensive and time consuming.
More recently, controlled electrolytic materials have been described in US Publication 2011/0136707 and related applications filed the same day. The related applications are incorporated by reference herein as though fully set forth. The listed published application specification and drawings are literally included in this specification to provide an understanding of the materials considered to be encompassed by the term “controlled electrolytic materials” or CEM for short.
Fracking systems that use flappers are illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,909,102; 8,167,048; 7,637,317; 7,624,809; 7,287,596 and 2011/0209873. Some of these techniques use shifting tools or pressure on the closed flapper to shift a sleeve to allow access to a frack port.
The present invention seeks to take advantage of such materials to solve the issues discussed above with prior fracturing techniques. At each fracking location an assembly of a sleeve that can be triggered with a rapidly deployed signal can be moved when desired to not only expose a frack port but to also allow a closure to move to a closed position for the borehole so that fracking can begin from the now closed passage. By making the closure and its associated seat from CEM or another material that can selectively disappear, the problem of subsequent production passage impediments from the seats or the closures are eliminated because the closures and seats simply disappear. The preferred closure is a sprung flapper that can be protected from well fluids until the associated sleeve is operated. Both the flapper and the associated seat can be made from CEM or some other material that over time fails or disappears in well fluids. The sleeve can be held against a bias force that is released with the delivered signal. The signal can be delivered electrically, magnetically or through electro-magnetic pulse or with a ball, dart or other device that sends a signal specific to a given stage in the series of sleeves so that the sleeves get operated in the desired sequence. Using a ball or dart that is dropped and/or pumped gets the signal to the destination quicker. As a result production can start sooner in a string that is not partially obstructed with ball seats so that a higher production rate can be attained and the need for drilling out ball seats is eliminated. Those skilled in the art will more readily appreciate other aspects of the invention from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment and the associated drawing while recognizing that the full scope of the invention is to be found in the appended claims.
Fracking ports are initially obstructed with respective biased sleeves that have an associated release device responsive to a unique signal. The signal can be electronic, magnetic or electro-magnetic pulse and delivered in a ball or dart or other device that is dropped or pumped past a sensor associated with each release device. Each sensor is responsive to a unique signal. When the signal is received the release device allows the bias to shift the sleeve to open the fracture port and to let a flapper get biased onto an associated seat. The flapper and seat are preferably made from a material that eventually disappears leaving an unobstructed flow path in the passage. The method calls for repeating the process in an uphole direction until the entire zone is fractured. The flapper and seat can dissolve or otherwise disappear with well fluids, thermal effects, or added fluids to the well.
The FIGURE illustrates the run in position at a given frack port before the sleeve is shifted.
Referring to the FIG. a tubular string 10 is in a wellbore and has a passage 12 therethrough. Surrounding the string 10 is the formation 14 to be fractured. There may also be cement surrounding the tubular through which the fracturing can take place but such cement is not shown. A frack port 16 is shown and it is blocked by sleeve 18 for running in. The sleeve is biased to the open position by a spring 20 pushing off of shoulder 22 on the string 10. The sleeve 18 can be alternatively actuated with hydrostatic pressure, a shifting tool, stored compressed gas, a stepper motor or other source of potential or other energy. A flapper 24 is in a chamber 26 that is isolated by seals 28 and 30. The chamber 26 can be filled with an inert material 32 to provide a longer period of protection from well fluids once the sleeve 18 is allowed to shift under the bias force of spring 20. The sleeve 18 is released to move when sensor 34 gets a coded signal unique to sensor 34 to release the sleeve 18. An object such as a ball or a dart 38 has incorporated within a signal generating capability such that on close proximity on the way past the sensor 34 the signal is processed to release the sleeve 18 so that it can shift under the bias of spring 20. As the sleeve moves down the port or ports 16 are opened and the flapper 24 is free to rotate counterclockwise until it falls onto seat 38 as the sleeve 18 descends below seat 36. Both the flapper 24 and the seat 36 are exposed to well fluids at this time, however, pressure in passage 12 can be immediately applied to frack the formation through open port 16 before sealing integrity is lost through the dissolving or other disappearing process that makes the flapper 24 and the associated seat 36 ultimately disappear to leave a clear passage 12 for later production flow.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a given string has a series of assemblies as illustrated in the FIGURE and that the process repeats in an uphole direction until the entire interval is fracked. With each higher location or location closer to the wellhead, the already fracked openings 16 that stay open are isolated by a flapper that is above that is triggered with another object giving another unique signal to move the next adjacent assembly as in the FIGURE so the process can continue. With the flapper and seat being preferably of CEM, after a predetermined time of exposure to well conditions or fluids added to the well the flapper and seat break up and fall to the bottom of the hole or are brought to the surface with production. The production flow path 12 is however, free of obstruction from flappers that have to be pushed up and out of the way as well as the seats that restrict flow by presenting a peripheral annular object in the flow stream during the production phase. The length of time for the failure and removal of the flapper and associated seat can vary. It can happened at or after the next flapper in the direction toward the surface has been triggered to close or at a later time when the entire interval has already been fracked up to or after the time production or injection is set to commence. The production fluids or injection fluids can trigger the failure and removal of the flapper and the associated seat.
Although flappers are indicated as the blocking device and are preferred because they are simple in design and very economical, other devices to block the production flow passage are envisioned. For example, the variety of different sized balls or darts that land on seats can be used and made of a material that goes away or dissolves and the same result can be obtained. The balls or darts can have a signal transmitter that is picked up by a sensor to release a biased sleeve to open the fracking port. Alternatively, electro-magnetic pulsing through the tubular string can be used for triggering the sleeve and flapper to close. Alternatively the seat can be integrated with the sleeve so that pressure buildup on the seated object can shift the seat with the sleeve.
The signal type can be radioactive, magnetic, electrical, electro-magnetic or mechanical. The sleeve movement can be driven with different types of bias such as a compressed gas reservoir, hydrostatic pressure either from the passage or the surrounding annulus or different types of springs other than coiled springs.
The sleeve can also be equipped for bi-directional movement so that after the fracking the production or injection can be sequenced or parts of the interval closed off as desired. The sleeve return movement to close the associated port can be done in a variety of ways such as a motor driven rack and pinion system, pressure cycle responsive j-slots or sleeve shifting tools to name a few options. Detents can also be provided to hold the sleeve in the open position after release to open with a signal as described above or to again retain the sleeve in the port closed position after the initial opening.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3264994 | Leutwyler | Aug 1966 | A |
4729432 | Helms | Mar 1988 | A |
4893678 | Stokley | Jan 1990 | A |
5070944 | Hopper | Dec 1991 | A |
6675909 | Cowart | Jan 2004 | B1 |
7287596 | Frazier et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7322417 | Rytlewski | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7350582 | McKeachnie et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7624809 | Frazier et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637317 | Hernandez et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7798229 | Vick, Jr. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7798236 | McKeachnie et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7909102 | Hernandez et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7926571 | Hofman | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8167048 | Hernandez et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
20070272411 | Lopez De Cardenas | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070272413 | Rytlewski | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090065194 | Frazier | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100230109 | Lake et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100243269 | Solhaug et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110136707 | Xu et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110209873 | Stout | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110284232 | Huang | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120085548 | Fleckenstein et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130014859 | Friedlich | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130014941 | Tips et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140041876 | Fleckenstein | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20150114664 | Hulsewe | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2013096100 | Jun 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Baker Oil Tools Advertisement, “What's New From the Leader in Completion Technology”, Apr. 1992, 1 page. |
Hopmann, Mark, et al., “Electronically Enhanced Remote-Actuation Systems Improve Deepwater Completions and Capabilities,” SPE 36995, 1996; SPE Drilling & Completion, Dec. 1997, 224-227. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150114664 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |