The field of this invention is an equalizing pressure feature for subterranean or downhole valves and more particularly a way to equalize trapped lower pressure in a ball or plug of a valve without having to run a tool in the valve.
Downhole valves are used to isolate portions of the wellbore for a variety of reasons such as for safety systems or to allow building a long bottom hole assembly in the wellbore, to name a few examples. Such valves have featured a rotating ball with a bore through it that can be aligned or misaligned with the path through the tubing string where the valve is mounted. The ball is surrounded by a sliding cage that is operated by a hydraulic control system from the surface. One such design features opposed pistons actuated by discrete control lines. This design was concerned about a pressure imbalance on an operating piston and provided a passage through the piston with two check valves 54, 76 in series to allow pressure equalization across the actuating piston with the ball in the closed position.
What can happen in this type of a ball valve that has upper and lower seats against the ball in the closed position is that pressure from downhole can rise, which leads to a pressure differential between the passage inside the ball and the downhole pressure. This pressure differential can distort the ball and make it hard or impossible for the piston actuation system to operate the ball back into the open position. One way this was solved is described in a commonly assigned application Ser. No. 12/366,752 filed on Feb. 6, 2009 and having the title Pressure Equalization Device for Downhole Tools. The solution described in this application was to use a tool that goes into the upper sleeve that hold a seat against the ball and separate the seat from the ball while providing pressure from the surface at the same time to equalize the pressure on the ball before trying to rotate it to the open position. The problem with this technique was that it required a run into the well with coiled tubing, latching and shifting the upper sleeve and associated seat enough to give access into the ball for equalizing pressure. One of the downsides of this technique was that the pressure admitted to try to equalize the pressure in the ball could be high enough to unseat the lower seat from the ball so that the higher pressure below the ball would get to above the ball. This technique also took time which cost the operator money and required specialized equipment at the well location, which could be remote or offshore and add yet additional costs to the effort to operate the ball when subjected to high differential pressures that could distort the ball enough to make it hard for the hydraulic system to rotate it.
In flapper type safety valves such as U.S. Pat. No. 5,564,502 the preferred method to get pressure equalization on a closed flapper was to simply apply tubing pressure on top of it to reduce the differential before using the control system to try to rotate the flapper. Of course, the flapper is built to rotate open with pressure applied above so that this technique did not equalize pressure around the flapper when it was closed but simply built up pressure above it when it was closed. Other equalizer valves mounted in the flapper were actuated by the hydraulic system moving down a flow tube that impacted the equalizing valve before the flapper was engaged by the flow tube as seen in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,848,509 or 4,478,286.
The present invention manages to equalize pressure by simple application of pressure from the surface that can communicate to inside the ball in the closed position for pressure equalization. That pressure communicated through a passage in the housing that selectively communicates the zone above the closed ball to the isolated passage within the ball when the ball is in the closed position. That communication preferably occurs through a check valve assembly that preferably has a series redundant feature and screens to assure that on removal of the applied pressure that the check valve passage will reclose allowing for normal ball operation to open the ball with the hydraulically actuated operating piston or pistons. These and other features of the present invention will be more readily appreciated by those skilled in the art from a review of the specification and associated drawings while understanding that the full scope of the invention is to be found in the appended claims.
A downhole valve that operates on turning of a member having a passage through it with a control system also features a passage from above an uphole seat for the member which communicates to the isolated passage within the member when the valve is closed. The passage features a check valve assembly that preferably has redundant sealing features and filters to prevent debris entry. Pressure applied from above the closed member gets through the check valve assembly to equalize the higher pressure below the ball with the pressure raised in the ball from pressure application at the surface. Removal of the applied pressure reseats the check valve or valves to allow the hydraulic system to rotate the member while the member is no longer subject to a high differential pressure.
The basic components of the valve of
The present invention addresses how to equalize ball 10 when subject to a high differential pressure before trying to move it. While the preferred embodiment is a 90 degree ball, the present invention is applicable to other downhole devices that because of their configuration can become exposed to pressure differentials that need equalization to prevent actuation system damage or damage to the element to be operated by the actuation system. The present invention allows the use of tubing pressure from above to equalize pressure so that the member or ball can then be rotated or operated in the normal manner without damage to any components.
Generally speaking, a bypass passage starts at an inlet 42 and continues to an outlet 44. Inlet 42 is in housing component 13 and is not seen in the section view of
All fluids entering inlet 42 go through filter 48 into its internal passage 50 and then into chamber 52. Check valve member 54 has a taper 56 with a seal 58 with an elongated end 60 that keeps valve member 54 centered as it moves axially against the bias of spring 62 that pushes on tab 64 on one end and housing 66 at the opposite end. Member 54 also has ports 68 that allow flow to enter once member 54 is pushed enough against spring 62 to lift the seal 58 away from the opposing tapered sealing surface on the housing 66. Flow around member 54 goes through opening 70 in retainer 72 that is attached to check valve member 76 and then through passage 74. Flow continues through passages 78 where it pushes seal 80 mounted on a tapered surface away from a mating tapered surface on housing 82 so that flow can go around the outside of the member 76 to reach the screen 84 held to housing 82 by retainer nut 86 through which is found the outlet 44. Removal of applied pressure at inlet 42 allows springs 62 and 89 to respectively move members 54 and 76 to put seals 56 and 80 against their respective tapered surfaces in housings 66 and 82. The ball 10 is equalized as between the pressure in passage 40 and the pressure at 88 below the ball 10 using the flow through passage 45 resulting from pressure applied above ball 10 to passage 46. The ball 10 can then be operated in the normal manner with the previously described hydraulic system.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that there are two stacked check valve assemblies and that a single or more than two assemblies in series are contemplated. Filters 48 and 84 prevent debris from entering passage 45 when flow direction reverses to enhance the sealing integrity of the seals 56 and 80.
The equalizing system that is described works on applied tubing pressure from above that is simple to provide and it is the applied pressure that operates the equalizing valve or valves to get pressure balance on the final controlled element such as ball 10 so that it can then be operated in the usual manner with a surface controlled hydraulic system. The application of the invention is to a broad range of tools that operate downhole where in a given position there could exist substantial pressure differential across a powered component that has to be overcome before trying to actuate that component so that damage to the actuating system or the component can be avoided. In the preferred embodiment the final controlled element is ball 10 and the actuating system is hydraulic and operated from the surface with a control line or lines actuating one or more pistons to cause ball rotation. The pressure differential across a ball 10 when closed can cause elastic ball distortion that can make it difficult or impossible within the capacity of the hydraulic actuating system components to operate the ball 10 when subject to such differential pressures without damage to the ball 10 itself or more likely the components of the hydraulic system such as pistons 30 or 32 or seals associated with such pistons. The equalizing system does not depend on forcing pistons against components and for that reason can be simply operated from the surface of a well without additional specialty equipment. The applied pressure directly operates the equalizing system, making it far more reliable than another system that adds movement of mechanical components just to open the equalizing valve or valves.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3273649 | Tamplen | Sep 1966 | A |
3421733 | Stewart, Jr. | Jan 1969 | A |
3667505 | Radig | Jun 1972 | A |
3741249 | Leutwyler | Jun 1973 | A |
3778029 | Baker | Dec 1973 | A |
3799204 | Watkins et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3826462 | Taylor | Jul 1974 | A |
3827494 | Crowe | Aug 1974 | A |
3830297 | Cockrell | Aug 1974 | A |
3845818 | Deaton | Nov 1974 | A |
3849218 | Beckwith et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3850242 | Crowe | Nov 1974 | A |
3853175 | Boyadjieff et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3854502 | Mott | Dec 1974 | A |
3856085 | Holden et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3868995 | Crowe | Mar 1975 | A |
3971438 | Crowe | Jul 1976 | A |
4044835 | Mott | Aug 1977 | A |
RE29471 | Giroux | Nov 1977 | E |
4100969 | Randermann, Jr. | Jul 1978 | A |
4103744 | Akkerman | Aug 1978 | A |
4113018 | Barrington et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4130166 | Akkerman et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4131216 | Gerstenmaier et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4140153 | Deaton | Feb 1979 | A |
4144937 | Jackson et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4197879 | Young | Apr 1980 | A |
4278130 | Evans et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4288165 | Fewel | Sep 1981 | A |
4289165 | Fredd | Sep 1981 | A |
4368871 | Young | Jan 1983 | A |
4386734 | Weible | Jun 1983 | A |
4446922 | Bowyer et al. | May 1984 | A |
4448216 | Speegle et al. | May 1984 | A |
4452311 | Speegle et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4478286 | Fineberg | Oct 1984 | A |
4804044 | Wesson et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4915171 | McMahan | Apr 1990 | A |
5052657 | Winship | Oct 1991 | A |
5117913 | Themig | Jun 1992 | A |
5346178 | Baker | Sep 1994 | A |
5564502 | Crow et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5865246 | Brown | Feb 1999 | A |
5890698 | Domytrak | Apr 1999 | A |
5893389 | Cunningham | Apr 1999 | A |
6148843 | Pringle | Nov 2000 | A |
6223824 | Moyes | May 2001 | B1 |
6260850 | Beall et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283217 | Deaton | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296061 | Leismer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6644408 | Ives | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6695286 | Florio et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6698712 | Milberger et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708946 | Edwards et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6848509 | Myerley | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6866100 | Gudmestad et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7537052 | Robichaux et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7614452 | Kenison et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20010045285 | Russell | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020153142 | Eslinger et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030056951 | Kaszuba | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040035586 | Gudmestad et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040220448 | Henkel et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226721 | Feluch et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060076062 | Andersson | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060243329 | Doble | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070113900 | Greene et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070119789 | Layton | May 2007 | A1 |
20080110632 | Beall | May 2008 | A1 |
20080217248 | Gebauer | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080271603 | Triplett et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090020291 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090050549 | Kerfoot | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090184278 | Beall et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110079394 | Plunkett et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110088906 | Myerley | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Andrews, Thad, et al., “Bidirectional Subsurface Mechanically Actuated Barrier Valve and Shifting Tool(s) Provide Superior Control and Reliability for Multistage Completions”, OTC 21866, May 1-6, 2011. |
Nowlin, Jr., W.D., et al., “Overview of Classes of Currents in the deep water region of the Gulf of Mexico”, OTC 12991, May 1-7, 2001. |
Instanes, Geir, et al, “Acoustic Leak Monitoring on Subsea Valves”, SPE 114256, Oct. 1-5, 2008. |
Andrews, Thad, et al., Bidirectional Subsurface Mechanically Actuated Barrier Valve and Shifting Tool(s) Provide Superior Control and Reliability for Multistage Completions, OTC 21866, May 1-6, 2011. |
Instanes, Geir, et al., “Acoustic Leak Monitoring on Subsea Valves”, SPE 114256, Oct. 1-5, 2008. |
Nowlin, W.D. Jr., et al., “Oveview of Calsses of Currents in the deep water region of The Gulf of Mexico”, OTC 12991, May 1-7, 2001. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110079394 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |