In magnetic storage devices such as hard disk drives (HDD), read and write heads are used to magnetically read and write information to and from the storage media. In an HDD, data is stored on one or more disks in a series of adjacent concentric circles. An HDD comprises a rotary actuator, a suspension mounted on an arm of the rotary actuator, and a slider bonded to the suspension to form a head gimbal assembly. In a traditional HDD, the slider carries a read/write head, and radially floats over the recording surface of the disk under the control of a servo control system that selectively position the head over a specific track of the disk.
Various embodiments are illustrated by way of example, and not limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which:
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of various embodiments of the present disclosure. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art, however, that these specific details need not be employed to practice various embodiments of the present disclosure. In other instances, well known components or methods have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring various embodiments of the present disclosure.
As described above, magnetic storage devices such as HDDs use magnetic media to store data and a movable slider having magnetic transducers positioned over the magnetic media to selectively read data from and write data to the magnetic media. The movable slider and magnetic transducers may be a sub-component of a head gimbal assembly (HGA). A magnetic transducer typically comprises a magneto-resistive read element (e.g., a so-called giant magneto-resistive read element, or a tunneling magneto-resistive read element) and an inductive write structure comprising a flat coil deposited by photolithography and a yoke structure having pole tips that face a disk media.
Read element 34 includes a first shield 44, an intermediate layer 38 which serves as a second shield, and a read sensor 46 located between the first shield 44 and the intermediate layer 38. Read sensor 46 has a particular stripe height and a particular location between the first shield 44 and the second shield 38, both of which are chosen to attain a particular read performance. Control of stripe height is important in controlling device resistance, device output amplitude, device bias point and consequently many related measures of performance. Magneto-resistive sensors can be used with a variety of stripe heights, with a typical stripe height being smaller than about 2 microns, including much less than 1 micron. Further, although read sensor 46 is shown in
Write element 32 is typically an inductive write element including the intermediate layer 38 which serves as a first yoke element or pole, and a second yoke element or pole 36, defining a write gap 40 therebetween. First yoke element 38 and second yoke element 36 are configured and arranged relative to each other such that the write gap 40 has a particular nose length, NL. Also included in write element 32, is a conductive coil 42 that is positioned within a dielectric medium 43. As is well known to those skilled in the art, these elements operate to magnetically write data on a magnetic medium such as a magnetic disk 16.
The flying height (FH), which can refer to the aforementioned air bearing space between media (e.g., magnetic disk 16) and the magnetic read/write head 30 (of a transducer) on a slider, is a key parameter that affects the performance of a magnetic storage device. Accordingly, a nominal FH is typically chosen to be a careful compromise between extremes in a classic engineering “trade-off”. Decreasing the FH is advantageous because an FH that is too high degrades the ability of the transducer to write and/or read information to/from the surface of the media/disk surface. Therefore, reductions in FH can facilitate desirable increases in the areal density of data stored on a disk surface. However, the air bearing between the slider and the disk surface cannot be eliminated entirely because the air bearing serves to reduce friction and wear (between the slider and the disk surface) to an acceptable level.
Because of the desire to reduce FH, the air bearing between the media and magnetic read/write head is quite thin and therefore, very susceptible to unwanted effects resulting from the introduction of any type of contaminate, such as particulate matter/particles and lubricant (lube) droplets or particles that can become trapped in the air bearing. For example, a magnetic read/write head can be mounted on a slider that flies a mere 10 nm (an approximate example) over the media. Any particulate matter that accumulates by being trapped within this very thin air bearing can create a variety of problems including, but not limited to the following: abrasive wear on the media/disk surface; magnetic spacing modulation; unstable flying conditions; and in extreme cases, crashing of the slider onto the media/disk surface.
Thus, one challenge that disk drive engineers face involves removing or preventing the entry of any particulate matter that is introduced into the air bearing so as to constantly maintain the desired nominal FH and reduce the risk of any particle-caused failures. Certain methods that have been developed in an attempt to reduce contamination in the air bearing have been directed at “blocking” particles from entering the air bearing, such as using a fence at a leading edge of the slider to block particles from entering the air bearing. Other methods include a particle trap design using deep pits in the leading area of the slider to trap particles that have already entered the air bearing. Still other methods rely on a lube blocker design, where a fence blocks lubricant droplets from entering the air bearing from the trailing edge of the slider.
However, the aforementioned methods can have a negative impact on the performance of the HDD due to incoming air flow that can also be blocked or trapped using such structures. That is, the aforementioned conventional methods of particle/droplet contamination prevention introduce air flow stagnation in one or more etched cavities within the slider. It is within these cavities that particles and droplets often accumulate. Therefore, stagnant air flow (or the lack of air flow) in these areas can exacerbate or even cause these contaminant accumulation problems.
Accordingly, various embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to one or more structural ABS features that can block particulate matter, such as lube droplets that may enter the air bearing from the trailing edge or rearward portion of the slider. Moreover, such structural ABS features can influence air flow within or about the air bearing to prevent or at least reduce the accumulation of particles and/or droplets in one or more areas of the air bearing to reduce the reliability problems induced by particle contamination and lube pick-up. It should be noted that in modern ABS design, one or more cavities are etched in the rear portion of the slider, close to the central pad of the slider.
In accordance with various embodiments, areas of airflow stagnation can be eliminated by the use of multi-step lube blocking structures. Such multi-step lube block structures can provide a “stepped” progression (with one or more steps or ledges) from a lube blocker structure into a cavity area proximate to the trailing edge of a slider. The number of steps or ledges may vary in accordance with different embodiments, but the number of steps or ledges may generally be a function of the depth of the cavity in which they are implemented. That is, the deeper the cavity, the more steps or ledges may be needed to maintain air movement in the cavity. For example, a cavity depth of approximately 2 μm or less may correspond to the use of a maximum of three steps. Moreover, the change in depth between adjacent steps or ledges is generally smaller than approximately 0.5 μm. Further still, an in accordance with various embodiments, the width of such steps or ledges may be approximately 15-40 μm, and in some applications, smaller steps or ledges may be preferable, while still remaining within any manufacturing thresholds.
It should be noted that sliders may have varying dimensions. For example, a “Pemto” type slider design may generally refer to a slider having the following dimensions: approximately 1.25 mm long, approximately 0.7 mm wide, and approximately 0.23 mm thick, although some manufacturers due to particular manufacturing requirements may configure a Pemto type slider to be, e.g., approximately 1.35 mm long. A “Femto” type slider may generally refer to a slider having the following dimensions: approximately 0.85 mm long, approximately 0.7 mm wide, and approximately 0.23 mm thick. In accordance with one example, slider 200 may be a Pemto type ABS slider design, where the length of slider 200 is approximately 1.253 mm, the width is approximately 0.7 mm, and the thickness at its largest (shallowest etched area(s)) is approximately 0.23 mm. In accordance with another example, slider 200 may be a Femto type ABS slider design, where one or more dimensions of slider 200 and/or one or more elements of slider 200 may be decreased. For example, and as discussed above, the length of a Femto type ABS slider configured in accordance with another example may be about 0.85 mm, the width may be about 0.7 mm, and the thickness at its largest (shallowest etched area(s)) may be about 0.23 mm.
Accordingly,
In the example of
In the example of
Various embodiments provide an easy and convenient mechanism that allows ABS designers to avoid the problems associated with particle and/or lubricant contamination. In particular, various multi-step lube blocking structures can be implemented on a slider to not only reduce the introduction of particulate matter/droplets into the air bearing, but also promote airflow in areas where particulate matter/droplets that are not prevented from entering the air bearing can still be flushed away. Because the aforementioned structure ABS features eliminate or at least reduce the opportunity for particles and lubricant to interact with the ABS, that chance for failure of the HDD and/or damage caused by the particles and/or lubricant is also eliminated or at least reduced. It should be noted that although various embodiments disclosed herein have been described in the context of magnetic recording media, various embodiments can be adapted for use with other forms of media, e.g., magneto-optical disks, optical disks, etc.
Although described above in terms of various exemplary embodiments and implementations, it should be understood that the various features, aspects and functionality described in one or more of the individual embodiments are not limited in their applicability to the particular embodiment with which they are described, but instead can be applied, alone or in various combinations, to one or more of the other embodiments of the application, whether or not such embodiments are described and whether or not such features are presented as being a part of a described embodiment. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present application should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments.
The terms “over,” “under,” “between,” and “on” as used herein refer to a relative position of one media layer with respect to other layers. As such, for example, one layer disposed over or under another layer may be directly in contact with the other layer or may have one or more intervening layers. Moreover, one layer disposed between two layers may be directly in contact with the two layers or may have one or more intervening layers. In contrast, a first layer “on” a second layer is in contact with that second layer. Additionally, the relative position of one layer with respect to other layers is provided assuming operations are performed relative to a substrate without consideration of the absolute orientation of the substrate.
Terms and phrases used in this document, and variations thereof, unless otherwise expressly stated, should be construed as open ended as opposed to limiting. As examples of the foregoing: the term “including” should be read as meaning “including, without limitation” or the like; the term “example” is used to provide exemplary instances of the item in discussion, not an exhaustive or limiting list thereof; the terms “a” or “an” should be read as meaning “at least one,” “one or more” or the like; and adjectives such as “conventional,” “traditional,” “normal,” “standard,” “known” and terms of similar meaning should not be construed as limiting the item described to a given time period or to an item available as of a given time, but instead should be read to encompass conventional, traditional, normal, or standard technologies that may be available or known now or at any time in the future. Likewise, where this document refers to technologies that would be apparent or known to one of ordinary skill in the art, such technologies encompass those apparent or known to the skilled artisan now or at any time in the future.
The presence of broadening words and phrases such as “one or more,” “at least,” “but not limited to” or other like phrases in some instances shall not be read to mean that the narrower case is intended or required in instances where such broadening phrases may be absent. The use of the term “module” does not imply that the components or functionality described or claimed as part of the module are all configured in a common package. Indeed, any or all of the various components of a module, whether control logic or other components, can be combined in a single package or separately maintained and can further be distributed in multiple groupings or packages or across multiple locations.
Additionally, the various embodiments set forth herein are described in terms of exemplary block diagrams, flow charts and other illustrations. As will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after reading this document, the illustrated embodiments and their various alternatives can be implemented without confinement to the illustrated examples. For example, block diagrams and their accompanying description should not be construed as mandating a particular architecture or configuration. Moreover, the dimensions in these diagrams and illustrations are not necessarily drawn to scale.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5490025 | Dorius et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5940249 | Hendriks | Aug 1999 | A |
6075673 | Wilde et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097575 | Trang et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6125014 | Riedlin, Jr. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125015 | Carlson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130863 | Wang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137656 | Levi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144528 | Anaya-Dufresne et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6147838 | Chang et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151196 | Carlson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6178064 | Chang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181522 | Carlson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181673 | Wilde et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6229672 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236543 | Han et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246547 | Bozorgi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249404 | Doundakov et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6330131 | Nepela et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339518 | Chang et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6349017 | Schott | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6373660 | Lam et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378195 | Carlson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6522504 | Casey | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6538850 | Hadian et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6583953 | Han et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594113 | Rao et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6646832 | Anaya-Dufresne et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661612 | Peng | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665146 | Hawwa et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6690545 | Chang et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704173 | Lam et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708389 | Carlson et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6717773 | Hawwa et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6721142 | Meyer et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6744599 | Peng et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6771468 | Levi et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6796018 | Thornton | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801402 | Subrahmanyam et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6856489 | Hawwa et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6873496 | Sun et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6879464 | Sun et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6912103 | Peng et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6920015 | Mundt et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6937439 | Chang et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6956718 | Kulkarni et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6972930 | Tang et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6980399 | Rajakumar et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7006330 | Subrahmanyam et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7006331 | Subrahmanyam et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
RE39004 | Park et al. | Mar 2006 | E |
7010847 | Hadian et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7019945 | Peng et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7027264 | Subrahmanyam et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7085104 | Hadian et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7099114 | Kang | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099117 | Subrahmanyam et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7174622 | Meyer et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7230797 | Liu | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7256965 | Rao et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7289299 | Sun et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7307816 | Thornton et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7315435 | Pan | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7315436 | Sanchez | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7408742 | Kameyama | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7414814 | Pan | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7436631 | Fanslau, Jr. et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7474508 | Li et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7477486 | Sun et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7525763 | Yao et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7593190 | Thornton et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7595963 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7616405 | Hu et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7729089 | Hogan | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7916426 | Hu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7978435 | Hanyu | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7995310 | Pan | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8081400 | Hu | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8087973 | Sladek et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8089730 | Pan et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8094411 | Huang et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8116037 | Kohira et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8164858 | Moravec et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8184405 | Zheng et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8199437 | Sun et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8208224 | Teo et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8218268 | Pan | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8240545 | Wang et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8256272 | Roajanasiri et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8289653 | Huang | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8295012 | Tian et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8295013 | Pan et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8295014 | Teo et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8320084 | Shum et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8325446 | Liu et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8325447 | Pan | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8339742 | Sladek et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8339747 | Hales et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8339748 | Shum et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343363 | Pakpum et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8345519 | Pan | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8418353 | Moravec et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8441896 | Wang et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8446694 | Tian et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8456643 | Prabhakaran et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8456776 | Pan | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8462462 | Moravec et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8477459 | Pan | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8485579 | Roajanasiri et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8488279 | Pan et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8488281 | Pan | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8490211 | Leary | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8514522 | Pan et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8533936 | Puttichaem et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8545164 | Choumwong et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8553365 | Shapiro et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8587901 | Puttichaem et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8593764 | Tian et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8599653 | Mallary et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8605389 | Pan et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8611050 | Moravec et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8611051 | Hanyu | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8611052 | Pan et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8623197 | Kobsiriphat et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8624184 | Souza et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8665566 | Pan et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8665567 | Shum et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8665677 | Panitchakan et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8665690 | Moravec et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8693144 | Pan et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8756795 | Moravec et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8758083 | Rudy et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8760812 | Chen et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8770463 | Puttichaem et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8773664 | Wang et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8792212 | Pan et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8792213 | Vijay et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8797691 | Tian et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8810967 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20030058578 | Boutaghou et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030165031 | Rajakumar | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040012887 | Rajakumar et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027724 | Pendray et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040150916 | Rao et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040156143 | Kang | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050105216 | Ueno et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20070103816 | Nakakita et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070195461 | Kajitani | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20110195275 | Huha et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20130244541 | Yaemglin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130293982 | Huber | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Shuyu Zhang, et al., “Predicting Air Bearing Contamination Using Airflow Pattern Analysis,” ASME Journal of Tribology, vol. 130, No. 1, Jan. 2008, pp. 011002-1-011002-4. |