This invention relates to lightweight armor systems in general and more specifically to an integrated, multi-laminate, multi-material system.
Many different kinds of lightweight armor systems are known and are currently being used in a wide range of applications, including, for example, aircraft, light armored vehicles, and body armor systems, wherein it is desirable to provide protection against bullets and other projectiles. While early armor systems tended to rely on a single layer of a hard and brittle material, such as a ceramic material, it was soon realized that the effectiveness of the armor system could be improved considerably if the ceramic material were affixed to or “backed up” with an energy absorbing material, such as high strength Kevlar fibers. The presence of the energy absorbing backup layer tends to reduce the spallation caused by impact of the projectile with the ceramic material or “impact layer” of the armor system, thereby reducing the damage caused by the projectile impact. Testing has demonstrated that such multi-layer armor systems tend to stop projectiles at higher velocities than do the ceramic materials when utilized without the backup layer. While such multi-layer armoring systems are being used with some degree of success, they are not without their problems. For example, difficulties are often encountered in creating a multi-layered material structure having both sufficient mechanical strength as well as sufficient bond strength at the layer interfaces.
Partly in an effort to solve the foregoing problems, armor systems have been developed in which a “graded” ceramic material having a gradually increasing dynamic tensile strength and energy absorbing capacity is sandwiched between the impact layer and the backup layer. An example of such an armor system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,633,520 issued to Stiglich and entitled “Gradient Armor System,” which is incorporated herein by reference for all that it discloses. The armor system disclosed in the foregoing patent comprises a ceramic impact layer that is backed by an energy absorbing ceramic matrix having a gradient of fine metallic particles dispersed therein in an amount from about 0% commencing at the front or impact surface of the armor system to about 0.5 to 50% by volume at the backup material. The armor system may be fabricated by positioning successive layers of powder mixtures comprising the appropriate volume ratios of ceramic and metallic materials in a graphite die and onto a graphite bottom plunger. A top plunger is placed in the die in contact with the powder layers and the entire assembly is thereafter placed within an induction coil. Power is applied to the induction coil to heat the powder and die. Substantial pressure (e.g., about 8,000 psi) is then applied to the die to sinter the powder material and form the gradient armor system. While the foregoing type of armor system was promising in terms of performance, the powder metallurgy process used to form the graded composite layers proved difficult to implement in practice. Consequently, such armor systems have never been produced on a large-scale basis.
A lightweight armor system according to the present invention may comprise multiple reinforcement materials layered within a single metal matrix casting. The multiple reinforcement materials can include an infinite combination of reinforcement material types and geometries. These reinforcements may comprise inorganic material systems such as ceramics, metals or composites with microstructures that may be porous, dense, fibrous, or particulate. Other reinforcement layers include dense ceramic structures containing interior voids or hollow regions and ceramic fabrics including ceramic-fiber weaves. The geometries can be in the form of flat plates of varying thickness, of multiple sequences and combinations of the reinforcing materials, and in the forms of spikes, spheres, rods, etc. The reinforcement materials are infiltrated with liquid metal which solidifies within the material layers of open porosity. The liquid metal also bonds the materials together to create a coherent structure. The reinforcement materials can be selected according to their individual fractions of void volume, or lack thereof in dense materials, that are to be infiltrated with liquid metal. The selection of different reinforcement material types allows the designer to vary thermal expansion coefficients throughout the structure to create varying stress states for increased effectiveness of the armor system. The selection of different reinforcement types may also be based on strength, toughness, and weight attributes of the individual material types desirable for projectile impact protection.
A process for producing a lightweight armor system may comprise the steps of 1.) positioning stacked layers of reinforcement materials within a mold chamber of a closed mold and 2.) infiltrating the reinforcement materials with a liquid metal and allowing for the metal to solidify to form a metal matrix composite. The liquid metal is introduced under pressure into the casting mold and infiltrates and encapsulates the stacked layers of reinforcement materials within the mold. The mold chamber is fabricated to create the final shape or closely approximate that desired of the final product.
The invention is best understood from the following detailed description when read in connection with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate an embodiment of the present invention:
A lightweight armor system 10 according to the present invention is best seen in
These reinforcement layers are placed into a mold cavity 12 suitable for molten metal infiltration casting. The reinforcement mold cavity is typically prepared from a graphite die suitable for molten metal infiltration casting with the dimensions defined to produce a multi-structure metal matrix composite. A lid 13 defines the mold cavity 12 prior to infiltration casting. The layered reinforcement material is next infiltrated with molten aluminum to form a dense hermetic metal matrix composite in the desired product shape geometry. Referring to
The metal matrix composite armor containing the insert is next demolded or removed from the closed mold. A significant advantage of a lightweight armor system 10 according to the present invention is that the various layers (30,35, and 25) thereof comprise different materials which have different properties to increase the overall effectiveness of the armor system. For example, the hard layer 25 has a high compressive strength and acoustic impedance, thus making it ideal for the hard, projectile-shattering medium. The metal matrix composite interlayer 35 mechanically constrains (i.e. supports) the hard layer 25 and aluminum skin 45. The mechanical support provided by the metal matrix composite interlayer 35 delays the onset of shattering of the impact layers 25 and aluminum skin 45 that occurs on projectile impact. The delayed shattering of the impact layers 25 and aluminum skin 45 improves the performance of the armor system 10. The metal matrix composite interlayer 35 also dissipates and attenuates the stress wave produced by the projectile impact. The energy dissipation function is enhanced by the variable ratio of hard and ductile layers. That is, the outer cermet (i.e. those layers having a larger percentage of ceramic material) layers or hard layer 25 is harder than inner layer 35 and outermost backing layer 30. These differing material properties tend to absorb or attenuate the shock wave more effectively than is generally possible with a material that has uniform material properties throughout. Utilizing material layers of different CTE values produces compressive and tensioned layers throughout the composite armor after metal infiltration and solidification. For example, high CTE AlSiC as a center layer, bounded by a low CTE ceramic plate at the top and bottom surface would result in compressive states at both the top and bottom sufaces thereby increasing fracture resistance. Furthermore, compressive forces on the surfaces would allow impact fractures to close or “heal”.
It should be understood that the preceding is merely a detailed description of one embodiment of this invention and that numerous changes to the disclosed embodiment can be made in accordance with the disclosure herein without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is to be determined only by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3547180 | Ray et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3633520 | Stiglich, Jr. | Jan 1972 | A |
4800065 | Christodoulou et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5047182 | Sundback et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5114772 | Vives et al. | May 1992 | A |
5164536 | Barbaza et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167271 | Lange et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5421087 | Newkirk et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5970843 | Strasser et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6135006 | Strasser et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6314858 | Strasser et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6609452 | McCormick et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6635357 | Moxson et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6679157 | Chu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6698331 | Yu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
20020088340 | Chu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020178900 | Ghiorse et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |