The present application is related generally to x-ray sources.
X-ray tubes can include a target material for production of x-rays in response to impinging electrons from an electron emitter. In a transmission or end anode x-ray tube, the target material can be on an x-ray window. X-rays can be produced in the target material, then emitted out of the x-ray tube through the window. In a side window x-ray tube, x-rays produced on the target can be transmitted through an interior of the x-ray tube to and through a window (physically separate from the target).
There are various advantages to having an ability to use different regions of the target, i.e. allowing the electron beam to impinge on different regions of the target at different times. One advantage is to allow use of a new region of the target when a previously used region has worn out or become too pitted for further use. Another advantage is to allow for different x-ray energy spectra, which can be done by use of different target materials in different target regions. For example, if the target includes a silver region and a gold region, x-rays emitted when the electron beam is directed at the silver region will have a different energy spectra than x-rays emitted when the electron beam is directed at the gold region. Another advantage is to allow for different target thicknesses. A thinner target region can be used when the x-ray tube is operated at lower voltages and a thicker target region can be used when the x-ray tube is operated at higher voltages.
It can be disadvantageous if the electron beam is redirected to different regions of the target. If x-rays are emitted in one direction while using one region of the anode, then emitted in another direction while using another region of the anode, the x-ray user may need to re-collimate and/or realign the x-ray tube with each different use. This need to re-collimate or realign optics can be undesirable.
Information relevant to attempts to address these problems can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 2,298,335, U.S. Pat. No. 2,549,614, U.S. Pat. No. 3,753,020, U.S. Pat. No. 3,900,751, U.S. Pat. No. 5,655,000, U.S. Pat. No. 6,560,315, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,983,394; U.S. Patent Publication Number US 2011/0135066; and Japan Patent Number JP 3,812,165.
It has been recognized that it would be advantageous to allow use of multiple regions of a target in an x-ray tube, while maintaining a stationary electron beam position (i.e. keeping the electron beam directed in a single direction). The present invention is directed to a transmission x-ray tube and a method of utilizing different regions of an x-ray tube target that satisfies these needs.
The transmission x-ray tube can comprise an end window hermetically sealed to a first end of a flexible coupling; a second end of the flexible coupling hermetically sealed to one end of an enclosure; a cathode including an electron emitter hermetically sealed to an opposite end of the enclosure; the electron emitter configured to emit electrons in an electron beam along an electron beam axis extending between the electron emitter and the window and through a hollow core of the flexible coupling. The window can include a target material configured to produce x-rays in response to impinging electrons from the electron emitter. The window can be configured to allow the x-rays to be transmitted out of the enclosure through the window. The window can be selectively tiltable to selectively align a region of the window with the electron beam axis, and thus selectively position the region in the electron beam by tilting the window and the first end of the flexible coupling at an acute angle with respect to the electron beam axis.
The method, of utilizing different regions of an x-ray tube target, can comprise tilting a transmission x-ray tube end window at an acute angle with respect to an electron beam axis extending between an electron emitter and the anode to cause an electron beam to impinge on a selected region of the window and tilting the window in a different direction to selectively align a different selected region of the window with the electron beam axis, and to cause the electron beam to impinge on the different selected region of the window.
As illustrated in
The cathode 2 can be hermetically sealed to an opposite end of the enclosure 1. The cathode's 2 electron emitter 3 can be configured to emit electrons in an electron beam 12 along an electron beam axis 6 extending between the electron emitter 3 and the window 5 and through the enclosure 1, through a the hollow core 4c of the flexible coupling 4. The electron beam axis 6 can extend in a straight line between the electron emitter 3 and the window 5. Alternatively, the electron beam axis 6 can curve if there is a curvature in the overall path or trajectory of electrons from electron emitter 3 to window 5.
The window 5 can include a target material configured to produce x-rays 13 in response to impinging electrons from the electron emitter 3 and to emit x-rays 13 out of the enclosure 1 through the window 5. The window can be selectively tiltable to selectively align a region 35 (regions are shown in top views of the x-ray source in
The acute angle can theoretically be any acute angle. For practical purposes, the acute angle may need to be sufficiently small to allow a large enough shift of the location where the electron beam 12 impinges on the window 5. A larger shift of location, and thus a smaller angle may be needed, if different regions are made of different materials. This larger shift may be needed in order to avoid the electron beam impinging on multiple regions, and thus multiple materials, at one time. It can be desirable to not have too small of an acute angle in order to minimize stress on the flexible coupling 4. Angle A2 or A4 can be less than 89 degrees in one embodiment, between 70 degrees and 85 degrees in another embodiment, or between 60 degrees and 89 degrees in another embodiment.
The window 5 can include at least two different regions 35a-b. As shown in
The window 5 can include more than two different regions 35, such as four regions for example as shown in
Decisions regarding the number of regions the electron beam axis 6 is allowed to pass through, and thus the number of regions the electron beam 12 will impinge upon, may be decided based on the mechanism used for applying force to tilt the window 5 and thus a number of different directions the window can be tilted towards, and also decided based on the number of different regions needed, or the number that may practically be used depending on the size of the window 5 and the size of the electron beam 12.
Although not shown in the figures, there may be multiple different regions in a single direction of tilt by using multiple angles of tilt in that direction. Each angle of tilt can be associated with a different region.
In one embodiment, the window 5 can be homogeneous throughout in terms of window thickness and target material. Thus, one region 35 can be identical to another region 35, and selection of different regions 35 can be done to allow the electron beam 12 to impinge on an unused region 35 of the target when an old region 35 is worn out.
In another embodiment, at least one region 35 can have a different thickness than at least one other region 35, or each region 35 can have a unique thickness. This embodiment may be used to allow the x-ray tube to be operated optimally at multiple voltages (DC voltage between the anode 11 and the cathode 2). Thus, relatively thinner region(s) may be used for lower tube voltages and relatively thicker region(s) may be used for higher tube voltages.
In another embodiment, at least one region 35 can have a different target material than at least one other region 35, or each region 35 can have a unique target material. Each different target material can be configured to change a characteristic of the x-rays emitted therefrom. Thus, one region 35 may include a silver target material and another region 35 may include a gold target material for example. X-ray spectra emitted from the silver target material can be different from x-ray spectra emitted from the gold target material, thus allowing the user to utilize either spectra without changing a direction of the x-rays emitted, and thus without a need to refocus the x-ray tube.
In one embodiment, as shown on x-ray source 70 in
For example, as shown in
Shown in
Note that the motion shown in
Another way of describing the motion of the flexible coupling 4 and the window 5, as shown in
The window 5 can be attached such that with no force F applied, the electron beam axis 6 will pass through a central region 16 of the window 5 (e.g. x-ray source 79 in
Shown in
A ring support 81 can be attached to the x-ray tube enclosure 1. The ring 83 can rotate around the ring support 81. The ring support 81 can include a channel and the ring 83 can include a mating channel. A fastening device 82 can be used to attach the ring 83 to the ring support, and allow the ring 83 to rotate around the ring support 81. Examples of possible fastening devices 82 include a snap ring, ball bearings, or an e clip. Lubricant in the channels can minimize friction as the ring 83 rotates around the ring support 81.
In one embodiment, the cavity 84 can include a slanted face 89 facing a portion of the window 5. The slanted face 89 can be tilted at an acute angle A2 or A4 with respect to the electron beam axis 6. The slanted face 89 can cause the window 5 to tilt at the acute angle A2 or A4. Use of this design can cause the window 5 to tilt at a single acute angle A2 or A4 as this acute angle of the window 5 orbits in a 360 degree arc 9 around the electron beam axis 6.
The ring 83 can include a device 86, such as a handle on the ring 83 configured to allow an operator to rotate the ring 83 to different positions, or an electromechanical mechanism configured to rotate the ring 83 to different positions based on input from an operator. The ring 83 can have gears that intermesh with a gear drive mechanism for rotating the ring. A force on the device 86 out 89 of the page, tangential to a side 88 of the ring 83, can cause the ring 83 to rotate clockwise with respect to a top face 91 of x-ray source 80. Continued force on the device 86 tangential to a side 88 of the ring can cause the acute angle A2 or A4 to orbit around the electron beam axis 6 to a different position, such as for example to the position shown on x-ray source 90 in
A force on the device 86 into 87 the page, tangential to a side 88 of the ring 83, can cause the ring 83 to rotate counter-clockwise with respect to a top face 91 of x-ray source 80. Continued force tangential to a side 88 of the ring 83 can cause the acute angle A2 or A4 to orbit around the electron beam axis 6 to a different position, such as for example to the position shown on x-ray source 90 in
Use of the ring 83 can have an advantage of allowing the window 5 acute angle A2 or A4 to orbit to any region 35 in a 360 degree arc 9 or 15 around the electron beam axis 6. Use of the ring can keep the window tilted at a single angle A2 or A4 regardless of the direction of tilt. Thus, the window 5 can maintain substantially the same angle A2 or A4 with respect to the electron beam axis 6 while the acute angle A2 or A4 orbits in a 360 degree arc 9 or 15 around the electron beam axis 6. The amount of tilt can be altered by the extent of eccentricity of the cavity 84 and/or by the angle of the slanted face 89.
The ring 83 can be a rotational means for applying force F to the window from any direction in a 360 degree arc 9 around and perpendicular with the electron beam axis 6. The force F from the rotational means can be capable of causing the window 5 to tilt at the acute angle A2 or A4 in any direction in the 360 degree arc 9 or 15.
As shown in
Each of the multiple collimators 101 can be aligned on the region 35 such that a collimator axis (see for example 106e on collimator 101e attached to region 35e) through the aperture, parallel to a length of the collimator, will be substantially parallel with the electron beam axis 6 upon tilting the window 5 to allow x-rays 13 to pass through the region 35a and the aperture of the collimator 101.
Each collimator 101 can be made of the same material, or can include a same material, as the target region 35 to which the collimator 101 is attached. This embodiment may be particularly useful if the different regions 35 have a different target material than other region(s).
Shown in
For increased life of the x-ray source, the flexible coupling 4 can have a single direction of flexure or tilt at one time. Flexing the flexible coupling 4 in two directions at one time can result in added stress on the flexible coupling 4, which can reduce its life.
For example, shown in
In some designs, however, it may be desirable to maintain a 90° angle of the window 5 with respect to the electron beam axis 6. Alternatively, manufacturing, allowed x-ray source space, and/or material cost considerations may make this design preferable. If a highly flexible coupling is used, then this design becomes more feasible.
As shown in
In one embodiment, the cavity 144 can include a face 149 facing a portion of the window 5. The face 149 can be perpendicular to the electron beam axis 6. The face 149 can maintain the window 5 perpendicular to the electron beam axis as the ring 143 rotates.
X-ray sources 130 and 140 are similar to x-ray sources described above in reference to
Method
A method of utilizing different regions of an x-ray tube target can comprise some or all of the following:
The structure of the x-ray tube in this method can be similar to the structure described above in reference to
This claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/772,411, filed on Mar. 4, 2013, and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/814,036, filed on Apr. 19, 2013, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1946288 | Kearsley | Feb 1934 | A |
2298335 | Atlee | Sep 1940 | A |
2291948 | Cassen | Aug 1942 | A |
2316214 | Atlee et al. | Apr 1943 | A |
2329318 | Atlee et al. | Sep 1943 | A |
2549614 | Leighton | Apr 1951 | A |
2683223 | Hosemann | Jul 1954 | A |
2952790 | Steen | Sep 1960 | A |
3679927 | Kirkendall | Jul 1972 | A |
3751701 | Gralenski et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3753020 | Zingaro | Aug 1973 | A |
3794872 | Haas | Feb 1974 | A |
3801847 | Dietz | Apr 1974 | A |
3882339 | Rate et al. | May 1975 | A |
3900751 | Holland et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
4007375 | Albert | Feb 1977 | A |
4075526 | Grubis | Feb 1978 | A |
4184097 | Auge | Jan 1980 | A |
4400822 | Kuhnke et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4504895 | Steigerwald | Mar 1985 | A |
4521902 | Peugeot | Jun 1985 | A |
4573186 | Reinhold | Feb 1986 | A |
4679219 | Ozaki | Jul 1987 | A |
4688241 | Peugeot | Aug 1987 | A |
4734924 | Yahata et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4761804 | Yahata | Aug 1988 | A |
4777642 | Ono | Oct 1988 | A |
4797907 | Anderton | Jan 1989 | A |
4870671 | Hershyn | Sep 1989 | A |
4878866 | Mori et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4891831 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4969173 | Valkonet | Nov 1990 | A |
4979199 | Cueman et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4995069 | Tanaka | Feb 1991 | A |
5077771 | Skillicorn et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5077777 | Daly | Dec 1991 | A |
5105456 | Rand et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5187737 | Watanabe | Feb 1993 | A |
5200984 | Laeuffer | Apr 1993 | A |
RE34421 | Parker et al. | Oct 1993 | E |
5343112 | Wegmann | Aug 1994 | A |
5347571 | Furbee et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5400385 | Blake et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5422926 | Smith | Jun 1995 | A |
5428658 | Oettinger et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5469490 | Golden et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
RE35383 | Miller et al. | Nov 1996 | E |
5621780 | Smith et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627871 | Wang | May 1997 | A |
5631943 | Miles | May 1997 | A |
5680433 | Jensen | Oct 1997 | A |
5682412 | Skillicorn et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5696808 | Lenz | Dec 1997 | A |
5729583 | Tang et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5812632 | Schardt et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5907595 | Sommerer | May 1999 | A |
5978446 | Resnick | Nov 1999 | A |
6005918 | Harris et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6044130 | Inazura et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6075839 | Treseder | Jun 2000 | A |
6097790 | Hasegawa et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6134300 | Trebes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6205200 | Boyer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6282263 | Arndt et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6351520 | Inazaru | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6385294 | Suzuki et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6438207 | Chidester et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6477235 | Chornenky et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6487272 | Kutsuzawa | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487273 | Takenaka et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494618 | Moulton | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6546077 | Chornenky et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560315 | Price et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567500 | Rother | May 2003 | B2 |
6646366 | Hell et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661876 | Turner et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6778633 | Loxley et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6799075 | Chornenky et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6803570 | Bryson, III et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816573 | Hirano et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819741 | Chidester | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6876724 | Zhou | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6976953 | Pelc | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6987835 | Lovol | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7035379 | Turner et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7046767 | Okada et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7049735 | Ohkubo et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050539 | Loef et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7085354 | Kanagami | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7130380 | Lovoi et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130381 | Lovoi et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7203283 | Puusaari | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7206381 | Shimono et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215741 | Ukita | May 2007 | B2 |
7224769 | Turner | May 2007 | B2 |
7286642 | Ishikawa et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7305066 | Ukita | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7317784 | Durst et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7382862 | Bard et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7428298 | Bard et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7448801 | Oettinger et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7448802 | Oettinger et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7526068 | Dinsmore | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7529345 | Bard et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7634052 | Grodzins et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7649980 | Aoki et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657002 | Burke et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7693265 | Hauttmann et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7839254 | Dinsmore et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7983394 | Kozaczek et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8247971 | Bard | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8526574 | Wang et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20040076260 | Charles Jr et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060210020 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060280289 | Hanington et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070217574 | Beyerlein | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080084966 | Aoki | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20100189225 | Ernest et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110135066 | Behling | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20130077758 | Miller | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130121472 | Wang | May 2013 | A1 |
20130136237 | Wang | May 2013 | A1 |
20130163725 | Hansen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130170623 | Reynolds et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130223109 | Wang | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130308757 | Wang | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1030936 | May 1958 | DE |
4430623 | Mar 1996 | DE |
19818057 | Nov 1999 | DE |
1252290 | Nov 1971 | GB |
5135722 | Jun 1993 | JP |
08315783 | Nov 1996 | JP |
2003007237 | Jan 2003 | JP |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/812,102, filed Jan. 24, 2013; Dongbing Wang. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/217,932, filed Aug. 25, 2011; Dave Reynolds. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/307,579, filed Nov. 30, 2011; Dongbing Wang. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/307,559, filed Nov. 30, 2011; Dongbing Wang. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/625,705, filed Sep. 24, 2012; Dongbing Wang. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,144, filed Apr. 15, 2013, Dongbing Wang. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,148, filed Apr. 15, 2013; Dongbing Wang. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,226, filed Sep. 26, 2013, Dongbing Wang. |
http://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/xraytubescollidge/MachelettCW250.htm, 1999, 2 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140314209 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61772411 | Mar 2013 | US | |
61814036 | Apr 2013 | US |