The present invention relates generally to a machine for identifying one or more cards from among a set of cards in a game of chance. More particularly, the present invention relates to a machine for identifying one or more cards from among a set of cards in a game of chance, including a plurality of wheels selectively rotatable about a common central axis and that can each be randomly stopped for identifying one playing card from at least one of the plurality of wheels.
Games of chance are well known activities whose outcomes are strongly influenced by randomizing devices and upon which contestants may wager money as they forecast outcomes. Common randomizing devices include dice, spinning tops, playing cards, roulette wheels, prize wheels, and numbered balls drawn from containers. Games of chance have been played throughout all of human history and are considered to be a popular pastime by many. Players of games of chance are attracted to new and exciting methods of game play as well as new and exciting randomizing devices. For this reason, the gaming industry is continuously developing new games and new randomizing devices to maintain player interest and attract new players.
Games of chance that include money wagers are typically regulated by governing authorities. These governing authorities enforce laws and regulations that are enacted to curtail certain kinds of games as well as certain kinds of randomizing devices. For example, in some jurisdictions, the use of dice or roulette wheels to resolve a game outcome, i.e., as the randomizing device, have been curtailed while other randomizing devices such as playing cards are permitted. More frequently, randomizing devices that use playing cards have been utilized as they enjoy fewer restrictions in games of chance played for money than dice and roulette wheel randomizing devices.
Additionally, table games managers are continually looking for ways to improve the efficiency of their Dealers in connection with all games, thereby reducing labor costs in the long run. Unlike slot managers, who do not have to worry about employee mistakes that cost the casino money (known as bleed), table games managers face these issues on a daily basis. As casinos gets busier and the tables get fuller, the decisions per hour can decrease dramatically and the potential for bleed increases significantly.
Therefore, there is a desire within the gaming industry to develop new and interesting methods of game play and randomizing devices which utilize playing cards in unique and interesting ways, suited to fast-paced, high-volume activity and which minimize the opportunity for bleed.
It is therefore an advantage of the present disclosure to provide a table game system that can improve the efficiency of the casino Dealers.
It is another advantage of the present disclosure to provide a table game system that can reduce the labor costs attributable to the operation of the game.
It is still another advantage of the present disclosure to provide a table game system that can minimize Dealer errors and bleed.
It is a further advantage of the present disclosure to provide a table game system that can provide increased player entertainment and enjoyment.
In accordance with the above and the other advantages of the present disclosure, an improved table game system is provided. The table game system includes a shuffler machine for randomly selecting a first card from among a first set of cards. The shuffler machine includes a plurality of rotating structures each of which has a plurality of slots uniformly spaced apart from one another about an axis of rotation of each of the plurality of rotating discs. The first set of cards in aggregate equals the number of slots that exist in the plurality of rotating structures. One card of the first set of cards is disposed in each of the plurality of slots. The shuffling machine also includes at least one detent mechanism for randomly identifying a single card on at least one of the plurality of rotating structures.
According to another aspect, a method of playing a game of chance is provided. According to an aspect of the method, a plurality of rotating structures are provided. A single card from a set of cards is placed in each of a plurality of slots formed in the plurality of rotating structures such that the total number of cards in the set of cards equals the total number of slots formed in the rotating structures. Each of the plurality of rotating structures are spun. At least one detent mechanism is selectively engaged to cause at least one of the plurality of rotating structures to slow and stop. At least one card is randomly identified that is relevant to the outcome of the game of chance.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more readily appreciated when considered in connection with the following detailed description and appended drawings wherein:
The present disclosure relates to a table game system 10 including a random number generator that allows one or more cards to be randomly drawn at a single time. According to an aspect, the disclosed random number generator allows multiple games to be played simultaneously, which allows for more game outcomes over the same period of time than prior random number generators. Alternatively, the disclosed random number generator may allow a single game to be played that utilizes two numbers to determine the outcome in a shorter time period than with prior random number generators. Still further, the disclosed random number generator allows a single game to be played where one number determines the outcome of the game of chance.
Alternatively, instead of a fully manual system, the Dealer could remove the card from the shuffler machine 12 and enter it into a computer that displays the selected card on one or more display screens associated with the table game system. Instead of or in addition to the game layout 16, a plurality of player terminals (not shown) could be included that allow players to input their bets and which will automatically resolve any wagers, such as is disclosed in more detail in Applicant's co-pending application Ser. No. 13/691,290 entitled “Turbo Card Table Game with RFID Card Identifier”, and filed on Nov. 30, 2012, which is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth fully herein. This can help minimize the potential for any Dealer errors.
The cards in the shuffling machine could include a readable indicia, such as a bar code or and RFID tag that allows the cards to be read by a card reader (not shown) in order to further minimize Dealer error that could result from manually inputting the card to a computer. Such a feature is also disclosed in more detail in Applicant's co-pending application Ser. No. 13/691,290. Additionally, the entire process could be automated, which would eliminate the need for a Dealer at all, such as is disclosed in Applicant's application Ser. No. 61/749,725, entitled “Automated Multi-Game Card Reading Apparatus” and filed on Jan. 7, 2012, which disclosure is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth fully herein.
With reference to
As shown, according to an aspect, each turntable 100a, 100b, 100c can include a defined number of trays 106a, 106b, 106c formed therein. Each tray 106 is preferably equally circumferentially spaced apart from the other trays about the central axis A. Each turntable 100a, 100b, 100c can also include a plurality of dividers 108a, 108b, 108c shown here in the form of upstanding pins located at the outer periphery 110a, 110b, 110c of each tray. The plurality of dividers 108a, 108b, 108c are equal in number to the defined plurality of trays 106a, 106b, 106c and are spaced one from another in equal circumferentially spaced increments about the central axis A. Each tray 106a, 106b, 106c is configured to retain a single card 114a, 114b, 114c therein. According to an aspect, the depth of each tray 106a, 106b, 106c is less than the width of each card 114a, 114b, 114c such that each card extends at least partially out of the tray 106a, 106b, 106c to allow for easy removal of the card from their respective tray as needed. The cards are preferably configured as standard sized cards formed of a relatively stiff material with a rectangular configuration. However, the cards may take on different shapes and sizes and may be formed of different materials.
According to an aspect, a set of cards having a predetermined number is provided. The number of cards in the set depends upon the game of chance being played. The number of trays 106a, 106b, 106c among all of the turntables 100a, 100b, 100c is equal to the number of cards in the set. Each card in the set bears an indicia related to a decision for a game of chance. One card is removably disposed in each of the trays. Alternatively, each turntable can contain a complete set of cards that each bear an indicia related to a decision for a game of chance such that each turntable has a complete set of cards.
According to another aspect, the shuffler machine 12 can includes side post 116 that is oriented generally parallel to the central shaft 102. The side post 116 may have a base section 118 that is connected to the base portion 104. According to one aspect, the side post 116 includes a plurality of detents 120a, 120b, 120c or flappers fixed thereon relative to the base section 118. Each flapper 120a, 120b, 120c is associated with a respective one of the turntables 100a, 100b, 100c and can be moved by a game operator into or out of interaction with the dividers 108a, 108b, 108c of its associated turntables 100a, 100b, 100c. The detents 120a, 120b, 120c are independently effective to apply a pulsating resistance to the free rotation of the associated turntable 100a, 100b, 100c to thereby progressively slow its rotation to a stopped condition relative to the base portion 104. An exemplary detent is disclosed in Applicant's co-pending application Ser. No. 13/691,290, which is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth fully herein. The detent may take on a variety of other suitable configurations. According to another aspect, the detents may be automatically engaged under computer control. According to still a further aspect, the turntable could be randomly stopped under computer control without the need for any detents or flappers or any action by a game operator.
According to an aspect, the turntables 100a, 100b, 100c are independently supported for rotation on the central shaft 102 so that the game operator (not shown) can spin any turntable in either (CW or CCW) direction. Depending on the game being played, the operator may engage any one or more of the flappers 120a, 120b, 120c to progressively slow and identify or select a card from any one or more of the turntables 100a, 100b, 100c and thereby randomly generate a card or cards used in play of the game. By this machine, a random one or more of the cards may be selected from the set of cards by progressively slowing the freely rotating turntables 100a, 100b, 100c to rest through the interference of the detent. The machine may operate in other ways, including as discussed above.
As illustrated in
Any suitable game of chance may be played with the present machine, including but not limited to roulette, craps, and the like. Another example of a game of chance that may be adapted for play with this invention includes that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,029,356 to Klein, issued Oct. 4, 2011.
The particular game(s) played using the subject machine will dictate the manner in which card decks are loaded into the turntables and the manner in which card(s) are withdrawn from the turntables to obtain game decisions. For example, in some games it may be desirable for the operator to set into spinning motion all of the turntables, but engage only certain flappers, and from those turntables to select a single card for the game play. In other cases, it may be desired that multiple cards be draw from each turntable 100a, 100b, 100c or perhaps different numbers of cards be drawn from different tiers. For example, in a craps style game with cards bearing indicia numbers 1-6, it may be desirable to pull two cards from each turntable to simulate a roll of two dice. In a further example, in a 3-tier system, the operator may set into spinning motion all 3 turntables, engage the flappers for all three turntables 100a, 100b, 100c, and withdraw two cards from the top tier 100c, one card from the middle tier 100b and four cards from the bottom tier 100a. It will be appreciated that any combination is possible. Thus, the selection of cards from the subject machine is not limited based on the composition of the deck.
In another example of game play uniquely enabled by the subject disclosure, a deck of 12 cards (or multiples thereof) are loaded into each turntable. The cards may be coded with particular identifying indicia, such as for example the colors red and blue. In this example, six cards are coded red and the other six cards coded blue. After setting the turntables in motion and then allowing one or more flappers in one or more of the tiers slow the turntables to a stop, the operator may (guided by game rules) begin withdrawing cards until two red and two blue cards have been selected. These four cards are used as the draw. In other words, the first two red cards and the first two blue cards are utilized as the game draw.
The foregoing invention has been described in accordance with the relevant legal standards, thus the description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed embodiment may become apparent to those skilled in the art and fall within the scope of the invention.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/586,152, entitled “Multi-Tier Card Shuffler”, and filed on Jan. 13, 2012, which disclosure is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth fully herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2661215 | Stevens | Dec 1953 | A |
3232622 | Lambert | Feb 1966 | A |
3588116 | Kosaburo | Jun 1971 | A |
3841637 | Piazza et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
4239226 | Palmer | Dec 1980 | A |
4309035 | Goldfarb | Jan 1982 | A |
4448419 | Telnaes | May 1984 | A |
4586712 | Lorber et al. | May 1986 | A |
4659082 | Greenberg | Apr 1987 | A |
4732386 | Rayfiel | Mar 1988 | A |
5033751 | Ching | Jul 1991 | A |
5382023 | Roberts et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5820127 | Rodriguez | Oct 1998 | A |
6019374 | Breeding | Feb 2000 | A |
6299534 | Breeding | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6536766 | Deitch | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6561512 | Luciano | May 2003 | B2 |
7464932 | Darling | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7472906 | Shai | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7669853 | Jones | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7677571 | Adams, III | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7762882 | Okada | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7901280 | Jarvis et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7946586 | Krenn et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7976023 | Hessing et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8317603 | Anderson | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8444147 | Grauzer et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8448945 | Hancock | May 2013 | B2 |
8505919 | Jones | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8506391 | Jaffe et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8628086 | Krenn et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20080073842 | Jones | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20120056373 | Jones | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130137501 | Jones | May 2013 | A1 |
20130181401 | Jones | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130307216 | Jones | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130181401 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61586152 | Jan 2012 | US |