This invention generally relates to multi-turn electrical coils and in particular to coils for use in high-performance motors, actuators and antenna applications where coiled wire bundles are used, and to devices where maximum coil density is desired.
There are many motor designs which have emerged over the years. Of particular interest is a type of motor whose stator resides on the outside and rotor resides on the inside of the motor structure. Sometimes this is called an “inside runner” since the moving element is on the inside and the stationary part (stator) is on the outside.
In most motors, the electrical-current-carrying conductors are made of copper, so throughout this disclosure, the word “copper” and “turns of copper” are used to describe the makeup of the coil. However, this should not be deemed a limitation, since some motors use aluminum or even silver wire to carry the electrical current. Moreover, it should be understood that the wire used in motors is insulated, so that subsequent turns do not short out with the rest of the coil, and that each turn does not short out to slots in which the turns are placed. In most cases, copper magnet wire is used, which is insulated with varnish, but the insulation can be anything that prevents electrical contact, such as cloth or even oxides.
There is a figure of merit in motor design called the “Motor Constant”, which is designated with the letters KM. The Motor Constant is a measure of the amount of torque produced compared with the power (i.e. heat) dissipated during the production of that torque. KM is expressed in terms of Torque per square root of watt, but may also be found by dividing Torque Constant (KT) by the square root of coil resistance. In all motors and actuators, the more copper you can fit into a given area, the greater the KM will be, and thus, in high performance motors, it is always desirable to maximize the amount of copper that is placed into the winding area.
In high performance motors, it is also desirable to effectively remove any heat that is generated by the windings. Coincidentally, the way you do this is also by maximizing the amount of copper that is placed into the winding area.
Copper has almost the highest thermal conductivity of any material, and thus, when turns of copper are placed close to one another, these turns can share the heat and also help to dissipate the heat to the stator material. Material other than copper (such as air or insulation) located in between the turns will dramatically reduce the heat capacity of the motor.
Typical coils are usually wound in a spiral fashion, starting at the inner-most radius, and arranging turns of wire side-by-side (for example from left to right). The number of turns arranged side-by-side establishes the “thickness” of the coil. Coils may have more than one layer, in which case, once all of the turns are arranged side by side for the first layer, this direction must reverse (for example from right to left) while turns are placed side-by-side on the next layer. Additional layers establish the “width” of the coil.
It is typical for the coil to be wound around an object that establishes its interior shape. The interior shape (i.e. the coil's inner radius) may be round, square, oval or practically any convex shape. The object around which a coil is wound may have “side-walls” that determine the thickness of the coil, and help to retain the wire during the winding process. The object around which a coil is wound is often referred to as a “bobbin” or a “coil former.” Throughout the rest of this document, we refer to it as the coil former.
Once the coil is wound around the coil former, the coil and its former may result in a single assembly that remains together for the rest of their lives. For example, it is common for coils to be wound around a plastic coil former (bobbin), and then laminations to be inserted around this coil/former assembly to create a transformer. In this case it is clear that the coil and its former remain together after the winding process.
In other coils, the coil former is removed once the coil is wound. This is most often done in what are called “self-supporting coils”. In order for a “self-supporting coil” to retain its shape, an adhesive must be used either after the winding process, or even during the process. It is known in the art to use a special kind of magnet wire called “bondable wire”, which has an adhesive layer as a part of the wire. Once a self-supporting coil is wound on a former, the bonding layer is activated, either by heat or by solvent or both.
In the field of coil winding, there is a term called “nesting”, which refers to the way in which the individual turns of wire are arranged with respect to one another. It is well known that, when using round wire (the most common type) to create a coil, ideal nesting happens when the turns on each layer are wound right next to one another, and the turns on subsequent layers are wound in the groves created by the turns from the previously-wound layer.
As will be further described later in this disclosure, turns of wire are arranged in columns and rows (or “layers”), and in a coil that uses round wire and has generally perfect nesting, the columns are shifted a half wire diameter, from layer to layer. Because of this column shifting, two layers of wire will take up less space than to two wire diameters, as would be the case with the layers sitting right on top of each other. The image in
With continued reference to
The coil illustrated with reference to
There is another possibility, which is to add a half wire diameter to the integer number for the side-wall distance. In this case, the number of turns on each subsequent layer will be as illustrated with reference to
The hexagonal arrangement of turns is clearly visible in both cases, and is highlighted by shading some of the turns, by way of illustrative example.
With continued reference to
There is another possible way to arrange the turns of wire that results in an opposite scenario, wherein the left and right sides form relatively “flat” surfaces, and the top and bottom sides appear somewhat “jagged” due to the empty half-turn areas. This is illustrated with reference to
While taking another look at the two possible ways of arranging turns of wire in which the hexagonal patterns exist, it is to be observed that there is a constant angular relationship of the turns, and of the hexagon. For conventional coils described above, whose turns are arranged to result in a relatively “flat” bottom and top, this relationship puts the angle at 150 degrees with respect to the side wall, as illustrated with reference to
By way of further teachings for the alternative coil described above, whose turns are arranged to result in a relatively “flat” left and right side, this relationship puts the angle at 120 degrees with respect to the side wall, as illustrated with reference to
With respect to the illustrations above, it is common for coil formers to have a flat “bottom”. That is, all turns on the inner-most radius of the coil are arranged on the same axis and at the same radius. Because of this, if it is desired to create a self-supporting coil, it may be difficult to remove the coil former after the winding process is complete. As turns of wire and layers accumulate, inward forces from each turn press inward on the interior of the former, essentially gripping it. Release agents can be used to aid in removal of the coil from its former, but it would still be more desirable if the coil became separated from the former more easily.
Although the figures discussed above, by way of example, show a cross sectional view of one part of the coil, the degree of nesting cannot be maintained all the way around the entire circumference of the coil. The reason is because the groves formed by the turns on each layer are essentially two-dimensional groves. Sooner or later, at one location around the circumference or another, the turns from each layer must “cross-over” turns from the previous layer.
At the locations where the turns cross-over, there is no longer a space advantage in terms of the reduction in space needed for two layers. At the cross-over locations, the space required truly equals two wire diameters. Likewise, there is no longer the same degree of thermal conductivity at the cross-over locations either, since the contact area, insomuch as the number of places where one turn is in contact with another turn is reduced.
In a most optimal case, all cross-over locations can be restricted to a single location in the wound circumference of the coil. When coils are wound in a typical spiral fashion, where the first turn is located at the inner-most radius of the coil and last turn is located at the outer-most radius, this type of coil winding technique is known as “ortho-cyclic winding.”
Ortho-cyclic wound coils are typically rare indeed because the machines that make them are very specialized, and because such coils must be wound very slowly and precisely. Yet further, for general-purpose applications, the level of copper packing and thermal conductivity are not needed, and thus, the additional cost and time associated with ortho-cyclic coils is avoided.
It is far more often for coils to be “random-wound” or “scramble-wound,” where the cross-over locations appear at randomized locations along the winding circumference. For coils that do not have round interiors, but instead have angles and straight spans, the reduced tension along the straight span coupled with the length of the span will usually allow the cross-over locations to fall along these spans instead of at the curved corners. This is why coils, which start out having angular or non-round interiors, will often wind up having more rounded exteriors.
Since many cross-over locations will fall along the long spans, one effectively ends up with cross-over locations on top of other cross-over locations until the entire exterior is round, at which point the tension is spread evenly along the entire circumference. After that, randomization of the cross-over locations will keep the coil exterior round, as illustrated with reference to
There is another drawback to conventional coil winding as well as to ortho-cyclic wound coils. Both types start their winding process at the inner-most radius of the coil, and essentially form a spiral outward, as each layer of the coil is added. Thus, one of the coil's lead wires exists on the inside of the coil and the other coil's lead wire exists on the outside. The two separate locations for lead wires may be disadvantageous in circumstances where both lead wires need to be connected on the outside radius of the coil, because in order for the inner-wire to reach the outer circumference, it will need to be lead-out along the side-wall of the coil, effectively adding another wire diameter to the thickness of the coil.
For motors that use a slotted stator, the coils are most often “race-track-shaped,” with the long portion of the coil contained within the slots, and the turn-around areas being folded over the outside of the slots. These turn-around areas are called “end-turns,” as illustrated with reference to
When creating a coil to be placed into slots, the coil can be created in several different ways. In low-performance motors and actuators, coils are most often “scramble wound”. As mentioned above, with a “scramble wound” coil, the turns that cross-over from column to column will be located at random locations around the winding circumference. Because of this, there will be many areas within the coil which are filled with material other than copper, such as air or insulation, which will exist in the areas where turns are crossing over each other. The randomized cross-over locations will require the coil to be wider, thus diminishing the amount of copper placed into the slots, and also diminishing the heat capacity of the coil due to the random air locations within the coil.
As described above, ortho-cyclic wound coils, coils having restricted cross-over locations, may be used in an effort to maximize the amount of copper within the coil, by restricting the cross-over locations to only a single area of the winding circumference. However, although the cross-over locations may be located in only a single place, the width of the coil will tend to bulge out at the area where cross-over points exist, as illustrated with reference to
As illustrated with continued reference to
Because of the bulging outward, this necessitates that the outside diameter of the motor be made large enough to accommodate the bulged coil area.
There is another downside to ortho-cyclic coils. Since the cross-over locations effectively contain a lot of air, due to the spacing between turns, the thermal conductivity and heat sharing is dramatically reduced in the cross-over area of the coil. For a high-performance motor, this could impose a performance limit far below the rest of the coil.
By way of example for a motor, actuator or other device that can use a coil having only two columns, another type of coil-winding technique may be used, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,237,165 to Tingley, III for Multi-Turn Coil Structure and Methods of Winding Same, wherein this type of coil places the turns in a side-by-side fashion, and winds both coils on a coil former at the same time. Since both left-half and right-half of the coil are wound at the same time, turn numbers are identified as 1L and 1R for turn number one on the left and right sides respectively; 2L and 2R for turn number two on the left and right sides respectively, etc. In this construction, the windings are crossing over at many points due to the dual-spiral approach, and because of this, the overall width of the coil is equal to two wire diameters. This results in coil packing as illustrated with reference to
The ortho-cyclic technique absolutely requires that the first layer of turns (or first few layers for coils that are relatively thin) be placed perfectly, thus creating groves for the following layers. Also, the points at which one turn is complete and the next turn begins must be managed very carefully, to help guide the cross-over locations of layers that follow.
Thus, to aid the ortho-cyclic winding process, a new type of coil former is needed that helps to establish desirable locations of the first few layers of coils, and helps to manage the cross-over locations. Moreover, for coil formers that are separated from the coil after winding (by way of example for creating self-supporting coils), it is desirable for the coil former to be easily separated from the coil, as will be illustrated for embodiments herein described according to the teachings of the present invention.
To restate a problem, ortho-cyclic coils are typically difficult to wind, but they do allow maximum copper density almost all around the winding circumference, except at the cross-over location, where the coil dramatically bulges outward. Side-by-side coils do not have any places around the coil where the coil bulges outward, but there is a reduced copper density at all points around the coil, and also minimized wire-to-wire contact, which in turn minimizes thermal conductivity and heat sharing within the coil. And finally, scramble-wound coils cannot be used for very high performance applications.
There is a need for a new type of coil that is easier to wind than typical ortho-cyclic coils, and allows a high copper packing density of ortho-cyclic coils without a dramatic bulging associated with the coils at cross-over locations.
With the foregoing in mind, the teachings of the present invention provide devices and methods satisfying needs in the industry for providing desirable coils. One embodiment of the invention includes a coil former that does not have a “flat bottom” portion for the coil, but rather has an angled bottom surface (i.e. angled inner radius) relative to side walls. This angled bottom may be created via a conical feature, by way of non-limiting example.
One embodiment may comprise a coil former comprising a first side wall in spaced relation to an opposing second side wall, wherein a cavity is formed therebetween and dimensioned for receiving multiple turns of wire for forming a coil therein, and a block fixed between the opposing first and second side walls, wherein a peripheral wall surface of the block is tapered from the first wall surface inwardly toward the opposing second wall surface.
One embodiment of the invention may comprise a coil that is ortho-cyclic in nature in that cross-over locations may be restricted to a single area of the winding circumference. Maximum copper packing may thus be achieved at all other points.
A method aspect of the invention may comprise forming a coil using a coil former having a first side wall in spaced relation to an opposing second side wall, wherein a cavity is formed therebetween and dimensioned for receiving multiple turns of wire for forming the coil therein, and a block fixed between the opposing first and second side walls, wherein a peripheral wall surface of the block is tapered from one end to an opposing end thereof and from the first wall surface inwardly toward the opposing second wall surface, wherein the method comprises providing a single strand of wire; folding the strand of wire around one tapered end portion of the block while leaving first and second ends of the strand of wire extending outwardly from the cavity; placing tension on the strand of wire and biasing the strand of wire against the one end of the tapered block; winding the first end of the strand of wire counterclockwise toward the block opposing end to place the first end of the strand of wire against an inner most tapered portion of the block so as to form turn one of the coil; winding the second end of the strand of wire clockwise toward the block opposing end at least one revolution and stopping proximate the opposing end of the block, thus establishing turn two of the coil and a first layer for the coil; again winding of the first end of the strand of wire counterclockwise one revolution around the block, wherein the first end of wire crosses over the second end of the strand of wire proximate the opposing end of the block; continuing to wind the first and second ends of the strand of wire in alternating counterclockwise and clockwise manner until a preselected number of turns is reached.
The teachings of the present invention are well suited for stators that have slots cut into an inside diameter, and where these slots hold turns of electrical-current-carrying conductors. One embodiment may include a slotted stator, by way of example.
Further, the teachings of the present invention provide for a desirable coil winding having multiple columns of wire. By way of example, coils having two to four columns will be desirable for both motors and antennas, such as used in RFID devices.
Embodiments of the invention are described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which embodiments of the invention are shown by way of illustration and example. This invention may, however, be embodied in many forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.
One embodiment of the invention, herein described by way of example, includes a coil that is ortho-cyclic in nature insomuch that cross-over locations are restricted to a single area of the winding circumference, and that maximum copper packing is achieved at all other points. Distinctions over known structures and methods include a coil former and associated winding method as well as resulting coils. Optional embodiments include a distinction in how the cross-over is accomplished.
Like the side-by-side coils described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,237,165, a single piece of wire is treated like two strands of wire, whose winding process starts in the center, and then spirals outward. However, unlike the well-known coils described in the '165 patent, the two strands are not wound at the same time. Instead, each strand is wound in an alternating fashion. To aid in coil winding, one embodiment of a coil former is created that does not have a flat bottom (coil inner radius) but rather the inner radius of coil former is angled which establishes the relationship of the first few turns of wire, up to the first few layers, and where all other turns and layers follow the initial relationship. One resulting coil is illustrated with reference to
With continued reference to
When winding the coil like the one illustrated in
To aid in the establishment of the first few turns, one coil former embodiment of the present invention has an angled portion on an inner block that forces the first turn to fall into an optimal position for coil winding. This angled feature may be a smooth angled surface (smooth conical surface as herein illustrated with reference to
For self-supporting coils, there is another benefit to having the angled feature of the coil former be conical or tapered inwardly toward the removable plate (a smooth angled surface rather than a stepped surface). After the coil is formed and its shape is retained with adhesive, the coil must be removed from the former. For conventional coil formers that have a flat bottom, there is a lot of inward force caused by the tension of the winding process. This force makes it difficult to remove the coil from the former. However, when the coil former has the angled feature, there is no inward force holding it onto a flat bottom. Thus, the coil is easily removed from the former. Because of this, the smooth conical shape is a desirable shape for the angled feature, although other shapes will work, as long as they force the first few turns of wire to the inner-most diameter of the coil.
For the two-column coil above described and illustrated with reference to
With reference to
With continued reference to
By way of example, one embodiment of the coil former 10 may be made in three pieces including a left-side-wall (second side wall 18 of
Unlike known coil formers, for the type of coils herein described and illustrated by way of example, one or both side-walls may have an area of greater spacing (i.e. greater thickness) where the spacing between the side-walls (which establishes the thickness of the coil) becomes greater than the 1.866 nominal thickness required for a two-column coil shown in
As illustrated with reference again to
As illustrated earlier with reference to
1. Starting with a single strand of wire 40, fold the wire generally in half, leaving two end-points down (a, b), and the folded area illustrated as positioned at the top end 23 of the block 22 and as up for the illustration.
2. Drape the fold in the wire 40 over the coil former block 22, and if optionally included, with the area of greater spacing 36 in the coil former 10 at the bottom end 37 of the block 22, as illustrated of
3. Place tension on the wire (a-b) with respect to the coil former block 22 to allow the folded wire to be pulled into the inner-most diameter of the angled feature in the coil former 10. The wire portion 42 (herein illustrated on the left side of the block 22 using tick marks on that portion of the wire earlier designated an “a.” This effectively establishes a first turn 42 of the coil 34, illustrated with reference to
4. Taking the “b” end of the wire 40, (location 43 in the illustration) on the right side of the block 22, wind around the coil former block 22 (herein clockwise), stopping at the area of greater spacing 36 or continuing beyond to again at the area of greater spacing. This effectively establishes a second turn 44 of the coil 34, as illustrated with continued reference to
5. By way of non-limiting example, take the opposite end of wire (for example the “a” end) and wind one revolution around the coil former 12, going the opposite direction (for example counter clockwise), crossing over the earlier wound b portion at the area of greater spacing 36. Note that this strand 46 will automatically be forced to ride directly on top of turn one and to the side of turn two, as illustrated with reference to
6. Continue to alternate ends of wire and winding directions, effectively repeating steps 4 and 5 above, until you have gotten to the number of turns desired for the coil.
7. Providing a bonding treatment if not using self-bonding wire. This step may not be needed if the coil is to be used while in the former.
8. Optionally, the coil 34 may then be removed from the coil former 10 as earlier described and as further illustrated with reference to
Note that for coils with many turns, the two ends (end “a” and end “b”) may be wound onto conventional wire spools. Then, during the winding process, the wire will be delivered from the spools to the coil former. This would be especially handy for machines which incorporate a winding method according to the teachings of the current invention.
By way of further example and with reference to
If the resulting coil is intended to be self-supporting, then in order to retain the shape of the coil after it is wound, an adhesive may be applied to the outside of the coil, or the coil wire itself may be made from “self-bonding magnet wire”, whose bonding action is activated by either solvent or by heat. A coil resulting from the above steps is as illustrated with reference again to
By way of example and with reference again to
By way of further example,
The invention may be used to create coils with more than two columns of wire, above described by way of non-limiting example, and indeed, when coils having more than two columns are fabricated, the coil former may not include the optional areas of greater spacing as will become clear to those of skill in the art now having the benefit of the teachings of the present invention. By way of continued example, one embodiment of a coil is illustrated with reference top
In contrast,
Looking at the difference between
By way of further non-limiting example,
By way of contrast based on the teachings of the present invention,
With yet further illustration,
With reference again to
While the angled feature of the coil former has been illustrated with selected shapes and angles, by way of example, it is interest to note that the angle used on the coil former may need to be changed in order to obtain a desired number of turns and alternation of turns between layers. Coils shown in
As above described, the coil former above described may be used to aid in creation of ortho-cyclic coils. With reference again to
With reference now to
Note that the coil is still wound using a left-to-right and then right-to-left cyclical nature, but the location of the first six turns is very precisely controlled by the angled bottom surface. Because of this, an ortho-cyclic coil can be much more easily created using this invention.
With reference to
Note that in addition to being usable with the conventional spiral winding technique (whether ortho-cyclic or not and with or without the area of greater spacing in the former), the coil former embodiments of the invention, herein described by way of example, may be used with the alternative winding technique described above. With the alternative winding technique, two ends of the coil wire are wound alternately, with one end wound clockwise, and the other end wound counter clockwise, one after another. Each end of the wire is identified as either “a” or “b”. So for example end “a” is wound counter-clockwise, while end “b” is wound clockwise, as illustrated with reference again to
Note that the coil former of the present invention may be embodied as a single piece, for example as a “bobbin” around which the coil is wound to form a coil/former assembly, for use in a transformer, motor, or other appliance. Alternatively, the coil former may be embodied in multiple pieces, as above described, for example one piece forming the left side-wall, one piece forming the right side-wall, and one piece forming the angled bottom (or inner-radius establishing wall). Likewise it is possible that the angled bottom may be an integral part of one side-wall. As will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, the multi-piece coil former is particularly useful for winding self-supporting coils.
Although the invention has been described relative to various selected embodiments herein presented by way of example, there are numerous variations and modifications that will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that, within the scope of the claims supported by this specification, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/758,300 filed on Jan. 30, 2013 for Multi-Turn Electrical Coil and Associated Methods and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/774,616 filed on Mar. 8, 2013 for Multi-Turn Electrical Coil and Fabricating Device and Method, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety, and commonly owned.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1408463 | Miles | Mar 1922 | A |
1555544 | Anthony | Sep 1925 | A |
2636523 | Hammerschlag | Apr 1953 | A |
4267865 | Negro | May 1981 | A |
5237165 | Tingley | Aug 1993 | A |
5746382 | Tsutsumi | May 1998 | A |
5892312 | Hazelton | Apr 1999 | A |
5929736 | Sakamaki | Jul 1999 | A |
5941357 | Tabuchi | Aug 1999 | A |
6060973 | Kawano | May 2000 | A |
6243188 | Stukalin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
7384012 | Burk | Jun 2008 | B2 |
D642265 | Hastings | Jul 2011 | S |
8284470 | Brown et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20030011271 | Takano | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040207501 | Souki | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060125590 | Pilniak | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070272346 | Shpik | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140209729 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61758300 | Jan 2013 | US | |
61774616 | Mar 2013 | US |