The present application is related to U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 14/302,826 for “Depth Determination for Light-Field Images”, filed on Jun. 12, 2014 and issued on Mar. 24, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,988,317, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present application is also related to U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/703,367 for “Light-Field Camera Image, File and Configuration Data, and Method of Using, Storing and Communicating Same,”, filed on Feb. 10, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present application is also related to U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 13/774,971 for “Compensating for Variation in Microlens Position During Light-Field Image Processing,”, filed on Feb. 22, 2013 and issued on Sep. 9, 2014 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,831,377, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for reconstructing dense light-field data from sparse light-field data and/or from image data that does not include light-field data.
Light-field imaging is the capture of four-dimensional light-field data that provides not only spatial information regarding light received from a scene, but also angular information indicative of the angle of incidence of light received from the scene by the camera's optical elements. Such four-dimensional information may be used to reconstruct a variety of two-dimensional images, including images at various focus depths, relative to the camera. More precisely, a plurality of sub-aperture images may be projected from a light-field. Each of these two-dimensional sub-aperture images can be considered a two-dimensional slice of the four-dimensional information. In a plenoptic light-field camera, a microlens array is used to capture an array of smaller images, each of which pertains to one of the microlenses. Each sub-aperture image is the image captured by combining pixels at the same location in each of the smaller images.
Unfortunately, known systems and methods lack the ability to easily generate four-dimensional light-field data from image data that does not include light-field data, or from image data that includes sparse light-field data.
According to various embodiments, dense light-field data can be generated from image data that does not include light-field data, or from image data that includes sparse light-field data. In at least one embodiment, the source light-field data may include one or more sub-aperture images that may be used to reconstruct the light-field in denser form. The source light-field may depict, for example, a two-dimensional or four-dimensional light-field. A first sub-aperture image that depicts the light-field from a first viewpoint may be retrieved, and a first value of interest pertinent to the first sub-aperture may be obtained. For a two-dimensional light-field, the first sub-aperture image may be a one-dimensional image. For a four-dimensional light-field, the first sub-aperture image may be a two-dimensional image.
The first value of interest may be used to generate the reconstructed light-field by extrapolating corresponding values for other sub-aperture images. The other sub-aperture images may include second and third sub-aperture images that depict the light-field from second and third viewpoints, respectively. Extrapolating the corresponding values may include extrapolating second and third values pertinent to the second and third sub-aperture images, respectively, based on relative positions of the first, second, and third viewpoints. Additional sub-aperture images may be retrieved and used to help fill holes in the reconstructed light-field resulting from occlusions caused by overlap of objects visible from the viewpoint(s) from which the sub-aperture images are captured.
The values of interest may be depths of one or more objects visible in the reconstructed light-field. Additionally or alternatively, the values of interest may be image values, such as hue, luminance, saturation, intensity, and/or color value, for the reconstructed light-field. Image values may be reconstructed by back-projecting images and depth maps for each of multiple viewpoints, and then combining the resulting light-fields into the reconstructed light-field. Additionally or alternatively, image values may be reconstructed by back-projecting depth maps first to generate a depth-field for the reconstructed light-field. The depth-field may then be used to back-project the images from the multiple viewpoints to generate the reconstructed light-field.
In other embodiments, the source data can take other forms. For example, in at least one embodiment, it can be data derived from or ancillary to a set of sub-aperture images. This data may include, for example, optical flow vectors, alpha masks, contours, gradients, surface normals, and/or the like.
In another embodiment, the source data can be synthetic data. For example, the source data may include computer-generated imagery that includes depth information; the equivalent of sub-aperture images can be generated from such synthetic data and used in the manner described herein to generate a reconstructed light-field.
In yet another embodiment, the source data can include captured image data that includes views and depth information, but does not include full light-field data. The captured views can be used as the equivalent of sub-aperture images, for applicability to the techniques described herein.
The accompanying drawings depict several embodiments. Together with the description, they serve to explain the principles of the embodiments. One skilled in the art will recognize that the particular embodiments depicted in the drawings are merely exemplary, and are not intended to limit scope.
For purposes of the description provided herein, the following definitions are used:
In addition, for ease of nomenclature, the term “camera” is used herein to refer to an image capture device or other data acquisition device. Such a data acquisition device can be any device or system for acquiring, recording, measuring, estimating, determining and/or computing data representative of a scene, including but not limited to two-dimensional image data, three-dimensional image data, and/or light-field data. Such a data acquisition device may include optics, sensors, and image processing electronics for acquiring data representative of a scene, using techniques that are well known in the art. One skilled in the art will recognize that many types of data acquisition devices can be used in connection with the present disclosure, and that the disclosure is not limited to cameras. Thus, the use of the term “camera” herein is intended to be illustrative and exemplary, but should not be considered to limit the scope of the disclosure. Specifically, any use of such term herein should be considered to refer to any suitable device for acquiring image data.
In the following description, several techniques and methods for processing light-field images are described. One skilled in the art will recognize that these various techniques and methods can be performed singly and/or in any suitable combination with one another.
Architecture
In at least one embodiment, the system and method described herein can be implemented in connection with light-field images captured by light-field capture devices including but not limited to those described in Ng et al., Light-field photography with a hand-held plenoptic capture device, Technical Report CSTR 2005-02, Stanford Computer Science. Referring now to
In at least one embodiment, camera 200 may be a light-field camera that includes light-field image data acquisition device 209 having optics 201, image sensor 203 (including a plurality of individual sensors for capturing pixels), and microlens array 202. Optics 201 may include, for example, aperture 212 for allowing a selectable amount of light into camera 200, and main lens 213 for focusing light toward microlens array 202. In at least one embodiment, microlens array 202 may be disposed and/or incorporated in the optical path of camera 200 (between main lens 213 and image sensor 203) so as to facilitate acquisition, capture, sampling of, recording, and/or obtaining light-field image data via image sensor 203. Referring now also to
In at least one embodiment, camera 200 may also include a user interface 205 for allowing a user to provide input for controlling the operation of camera 200 for capturing, acquiring, storing, and/or processing image data. The user interface 205 may receive user input from the user via an input device 206, which may include any one or more user input mechanisms known in the art. For example, the input device 206 may include one or more buttons, switches, touch screens, gesture interpretation devices, pointing devices, and/or the like.
Similarly, in at least one embodiment, post-processing system 300 may include a user interface 305 that allows the user to initiate processing, viewing, and/or other output of light-field images. The user interface 305 may additionally or alternatively facilitate the receipt of user input from the user to establish one or more parameters of subsequent image processing.
In at least one embodiment, camera 200 may also include control circuitry 210 for facilitating acquisition, sampling, recording, and/or obtaining light-field image data. For example, control circuitry 210 may manage and/or control (automatically or in response to user input) the acquisition timing, rate of acquisition, sampling, capturing, recording, and/or obtaining of light-field image data.
In at least one embodiment, camera 200 may include memory 211 for storing image data, such as output by image sensor 203. Such memory 211 can include external and/or internal memory. In at least one embodiment, memory 211 can be provided at a separate device and/or location from camera 200.
For example, camera 200 may store raw light-field image data, as output by image sensor 203, and/or a representation thereof, such as a compressed image data file. In addition, as described in related U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/703,367 for “Light-Field Camera Image, File and Configuration Data, and Method of Using, Storing and Communicating Same,”, filed on Feb. 10, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference, memory 211 can also store data representing the characteristics, parameters, and/or configurations (collectively “configuration data”) of device 209. The configuration data may include light-field image capture parameters such as zoom and focus settings.
In at least one embodiment, captured image data is provided to post-processing circuitry 204. The post-processing circuitry 204 may be disposed in or integrated into light-field image data acquisition device 209, as shown in
Such a separate component may include any of a wide variety of computing devices, including but not limited to computers, smartphones, tablets, cameras, and/or any other device that processes digital information. Such a separate component may include additional features such as a user input 215 and/or a display screen 216. If desired, light-field image data may be displayed for the user on the display screen 216.
Light-Field Imaging Overview
Light-field images often include a plurality of projections (which may be circular or of other shapes) of aperture 212 of camera 200, each projection taken from a different vantage point on the camera's focal plane. The light-field image may be captured on image sensor 203. The interposition of microlens array 202 between main lens 213 and image sensor 203 causes images of aperture 212 to be formed on image sensor 203, each microlens in microlens array 202 projecting a small image of main-lens aperture 212 onto image sensor 203. These aperture-shaped projections are referred to herein as disks, although they need not be circular in shape. The term “disk” is not intended to be limited to a circular region, but can refer to a region of any shape.
Light-field images include four dimensions of information describing light rays impinging on the focal plane of camera 200 (or other capture device). Two spatial dimensions (herein referred to as x and y) are represented by the disks themselves. For example, the spatial resolution of a light-field image with 120,000 disks, arranged in a Cartesian pattern 400 wide and 300 high, is 400×300. Two angular dimensions (herein referred to as u and v) are represented as the pixels within an individual disk. For example, the angular resolution of a light-field image with 100 pixels within each disk, arranged as a 10×10 Cartesian pattern, is 10×10. This light-field image has a 4-D (x,y,u,v) resolution of (400,300,10,10). Referring now to
In at least one embodiment, the 4-D light-field representation may be reduced to a 2-D image through a process of projection and reconstruction. As described in more detail in related U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 13/774,971 for “Compensating for Variation in Microlens Position During Light-Field Image Processing,”, filed on Feb. 22, 2013 and issued on Sep. 9, 2014 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,831,377, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, a virtual surface of projection may be introduced, and the intersections of representative rays with the virtual surface can be computed. The color of each representative ray may be taken to be equal to the color of its corresponding pixel.
Light-Field Reconstruction
There are many instances in which it may be desirable to construct, or reconstruct, a dense light-field from sparse light-field image data, or from image data that does not include light-field data. Four applications for these techniques will be discussed herein; those of skill in the art will recognize that these are merely exemplary, and the systems and methods provided herein may be used in many other instances.
First, the light-field may be captured with a light-field camera, but may not be captured with the desired level of density, or may not be preserved in the course of data transmission and/or processing. For example, if the light-field camera used to capture the light-field does not provide the desired angular resolution, it may be desirable to reconstruct the light-field so that it has higher resolution than that with which it was captured. Similarly, if the light-field data captured initially are compressed for storage and/or transmission, it may be desirable to reconstruct the density of the original light-field. In such instances, the systems and methods provided herein may be used to fill out the density of the light-field through the extrapolation of re-projections, such as sub-aperture views, of the sparse light-field.
Second, it may be desirable to utilize data derived from or ancillary to such sub-aperture images to reconstruct the light-field. For example, optical flow vectors, alpha masks, contours, gradients, surface normals, and/or the like may be obtained in connection with sub-aperture views. Such ancillary data may be used, for example, to apply traditional two-dimensional image processing techniques to a light-field without the need to rework them for four-dimensional application. Rather, such ancillary data may be extended from one or more views to additional views in order to apply image processing across the light-field.
Third, a light-field may be generated from synthetic data (i.e., image data that has not been captured by a camera). For example, computer generated renders from a camera rig, deep images, matte paintings, and/or the like may be used to provide image data from which a light-field may be constructed. In some embodiments, the synthetic data may optionally be used as the basis of a light-field that matches a captured light-field in some respects. Notably, in this application, “reconstruction” of a light-field will be interpreted to include construction of a light-field that never actually existed, as may be accomplished with re-projection of synthetic image data.
Fourth, a light-field may be generated based on the capture of non-light-field data, such as conventional imagery. For example, one or more camera rigs may be used to capture one or more images and/or associated depth information, without capturing the full light-field. The one or more camera rigs may be conventional cameras rather than light-field cameras. The systems and methods provided herein may be used to extrapolate the full light-field based on the limited images and/or depth information captured. Again, in this application, “reconstruction” of a light-field will be interpreted to include construction of a light-field that never actually existed.
The present disclosure will focus on the first use case provided above, i.e., use of sparse light-field data to reconstruct a denser light-field, by way of example. Thus, in many instances, the description below refers to sub-aperture images. However, those of skill in the art will recognize that the methods and techniques applied below to sub-aperture images may also be applied to any type of image data, which may include any type of view, including but not limited to sub-aperture images, views obtained from conventional images, and views obtained from synthetic image data, as mentioned above. In such applications and embodiments, the system may generate or obtain image data that is used as the equivalent of sub-aperture images for purposes of reconstruction or generation of a light-field using the techniques described herein.
Traditionally, generating a light-field requires a large number of views as input. Via the approach provided in the present disclosure, a smaller subset of views and a subset of depth maps may be used to reconstruct the light-field. In this application, the term “reconstruct” does not require the precise replication of an original light-field, but rather applies to approximations, with the possibility of loss of some color and/or depth information from the light-field to be reconstructed, or to generation of a new light-field based on synthetic image data. Furthermore, as mentioned above, such “reconstruction” can include techniques for generating a light-field where none existed before.
Referring to
The method may start 500 with a step 510 in which one or more sub-aperture images may be retrieved, for example, from a data store such as the memory 211 of the light-field camera 200 of
In a step 520, a value of interest may be obtained from each of the one or more sub-aperture images. This value of interest may be the value that is to be reconstructed in the reconstructed light-field. For example, the value of interest may be a depth of one or more objects depicted in the sub-aperture images, if reconstructing the light-field is to include reconstruction of depth data. Additionally or alternatively, if reconstruction of the light-field is to include reconstruction of image data (for example, hue, luminance, saturation, and/or intensity data), the value of interest may be the image data for one or more pixels of the one or more sub-aperture images.
In a step 530, the value(s) of interest obtained in the step 520 may be used to generate the reconstructed light-field by extrapolating corresponding values for other sub-aperture images. This may yield values of interest, such as depth values and/or image values, for other sub-aperture images that were not retrieved in the step 510. These values of interest may be used, for example, via back-projection, to obtain the reconstructed light-field. The method may then end 590.
Examples will be presented below, depicting various ways in which the method may be carried out. The examples presented hereafter will commence with a discussion of reconstruction of the depth data, and then proceed to a discussion of reconstruction of the image data.
Depth Back-Projection
Initially, the case of back-projecting a depth map from single view into a light-field depth map will be presented. For simplicity, rather than looking at a four-dimensional light-field used to project two-dimensional images, a two-dimensional light-field and corresponding one-dimensional images will be presented.
Given a depth value in a single view (such as a center sub-aperture image), that value may be expanded along its epipolar slope to extrapolate depth values to the rest of the light-field. Epipolar slopes and images are described in related U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 14/302,826 for “Depth Determination for Light-Field Images”, filed on Jun. 12, 2014 and issued on Mar. 24, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,988,317, which is incorporated herein by reference. An epipolar image may be an image of a single line across a body of light-field data, which may provide an x,u plot of the data.
Expansion along epipolar slopes may provide depth values at every light-field point, and not just the points at the sub-aperture location. This will be shown and described in connection with
Given a single background object at positive lambda (orange), as in
Δx∝λΔn
Accordingly, it follows that:
dx/du∝λ
Accordingly, the depth value can be extrapolated to the rest of the light-field by following the slope given by lambda. The same is true for
A problem may arise when foreground and background objects are mixed. This will be described with reference to
The disparities between
Techniques for filling in such holes are known in the art. Additionally or alternatively, more than one view may be used for back-projection to help fill in such holes, as described in the following section, with reference to image back-projection which will be described in greater detail in connection with
Multi-View Back-Projection
As mentioned above, one possible solution to the problem of holes in the back-projection is to employ more views. This may provide the ability to “look around” the occlusion and propagate the discovered values into the reconstructed light-field. For example, the light-field depth map of
For each of the center sub-aperture 922, the left sub-aperture 920 and the right sub-aperture 924, the same process of expanding the depth values along the epipolar slope may be applied, resulting in three back-projected depth maps. Specifically,
This combination may be carried out in various ways. According to one example, weighted averages may be used to combine the center depth map 932, the left depth map 930, and the right depth map 934. In any case, the result may be that a sparse light-field, such as a subset of sub-aperture views, can be extrapolated to a dense light-field by utilizing the constraints imposed by known depth maps. This may facilitate the reconstruction of a light-field of higher angular resolution from a light-field captured at lower resolution, a light-field compressed and represented through the use of a limited number of sub-aperture views, and/or the like.
Keyhole Problem
In some cases of occlusion, the use of a pre-defined set of additional sub-aperture views may not be sufficient to fill in the holes in the reconstructed light-field. For example, in a “keyhole” problem, a background object is only visible through a small hole in the foreground object. Because the hole is so small, the left and right sub-aperture views may only partially look around the occlusion. Combining the back-projected depths may still result in holes, although the holes may be smaller.
The center depth map 1132, the left depth map 1130, and the right depth map 1134 may each have holes; these holes may be in different places for each depth map. Unfortunately, the geometry of the occlusions may cause holes to be present in the reconstructed light-field 1140 generated from the combination of the center depth map 1132, the left depth map 1130, and the right depth map 1134.
This problem may be solved in various ways. According to some embodiments, the remaining holes may be filled by adding additional views, or by interpolating the existing information. Some reconstruction methods may employ iterative processes by which reconstruction is initially carried out with a limited number of sub-aperture views, and then new sub-aperture views are added as needed to enable such holes to be filled in.
Image Back-Projection
In the above examples, the depth values themselves were back-projected into a light-field. However, the systems and methods of the present disclosure are not limited to back-projection of depth values. Rather, any values can be back-projected, including image values. As described above in connection with depth values, the image values may be expanded along epipolar slopes. In cases in which image data is back-projected from sub-aperture views the result may be the creation of a dense light-field from a sparse light-field. There are many ways to accomplish this. Two ways will be described herein: per-view back-projection and depth-first back-projection.
Per View Back-Projection
Thus, in
In the most straightforward case, the image values may be back-projected directly from the sub-aperture image (for example, the first image 1210 through the nth image 1240) given its corresponding depth map (the first depth map 1212 through the nth depth map 1242). In the alternative, the depth map may be back-projected first; the back-projected depth value may then be used to back-project the image value. This alternative method may be less straightforward in implementation, but may allow for more flexibility. In particular, back-projecting values using an already back-projected depth map may not require epipolar slope expansion.
For back-projecting values after depth back-projection, a depth value λ for each light-field point (x, y, u, v) may be easily obtained. For a given sub-aperture at location (u′, v′), that light-field coordinate would project to x′=x−λ(u−u′) and y′=y−λ(v−v′). The normalization factor has been ignored here. The sub-aperture image may simply be sampled at (x′, y′) to obtain the light-field value at (x, y, u, v). In the case of occlusion, no λ may exist, and the ray may correctly receive no information from this view.
One exemplary algorithm for carrying out per-view back-projection is as follows:
Per-view back-projection may have some noteworthy advantages. The primary advantage of this approach may be simplicity. In particular, occlusion may be (mostly) automatically handled. A secondary advantage is flexibility, since not all views have to be processed to generate a back-projected light-field. In one use case, a minimal number of views may be back-projected, and if occlusions still exist (i.e. due to the keyhole problem), additional views may be back-projected without having to reprocess the original views. If memory efficiency is desired, the back-projected depth map may not need to be generated if back-projection is carried out directly from the sub-aperture images without back-projecting the depth map first.
Depth-First Back-Projection
Once the depth-field 1330 has been created, each view, for example, each of a plurality of images, from a first image 1340 to an nth image 1342, may be back-projected 1370 using the depth-field 1330. The resulting back-projections may be combined to generate the reconstructed light-field 1380. Through the aid of the present disclosure, a person of skill in the art will recognize how the exemplary algorithm for per-view back-projection may be modified to carry out depth-first back-projection.
During the back-projection of the images, care must be taken to handle occlusion. The depth-field 1330 will likely be fully populated, but this does not mean that a view will contain information for every ray.
Depth-first back-projection may also have a number of advantages. The principal advantage may be that the depth maps (the first depth map 1310 through the nth depth map 1312) need not necessarily be co-aligned with the sub-aperture images (the first image 1340 through the nth image 1342). A second advantage is that because the back-projected depth maps are combined first, additional processing can be used to improve the depth accuracy. Such additional processing can lead to more accurate depth values used during image back-projection.
Per-view back-projection and depth-first back-projection may both utilize the extrapolation methods set forth previously. Thus, a mosaic of images and/or depth maps may be used to generate the reconstructed light-field. This process is not limited to the one-dimensional sub-aperture images and two-dimensional light-fields provided in the preceding examples. Rather, such back-projection processes may be applied to two-dimensional sub-aperture images and depth maps, and may be used to reconstruct a four-dimensional (x,y,u,v) light-field.
Back-Projection of Computer-Generated Image Data to Light-Field
In at least one embodiment, computer-generated imagery may be back-projected to reconstruct a light-field. According to one example, a first step is to render a number of views of the computer-generated scene. Since the rendering quality for such scenes is generally high and the depth information is often exact, it may not be necessary to back-project more than a subset of views. In at least one embodiment, in order to avoid aliasing artifacts, the views may be rendered at high resolution.
Referring to
Referring to
The above description and referenced drawings set forth particular details with respect to possible embodiments. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the techniques described herein may be practiced in other embodiments. First, the particular naming of the components, capitalization of terms, the attributes, data structures, or any other programming or structural aspect is not mandatory or significant, and the mechanisms that implement the techniques described herein may have different names, formats, or protocols. Further, the system may be implemented via a combination of hardware and software, as described, or entirely in hardware elements, or entirely in software elements. Also, the particular division of functionality between the various system components described herein is merely exemplary, and not mandatory; functions performed by a single system component may instead be performed by multiple components, and functions performed by multiple components may instead be performed by a single component.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or to “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments is included in at least one embodiment. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Some embodiments may include a system or a method for performing the above-described techniques, either singly or in any combination. Other embodiments may include a computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium and computer program code, encoded on the medium, for causing a processor in a computing device or other electronic device to perform the above-described techniques.
Some portions of the above are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a memory of a computing device. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps (instructions) leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical, magnetic or optical signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared and otherwise manipulated. It is convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like. Furthermore, it is also convenient at times, to refer to certain arrangements of steps requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities as modules or code devices, without loss of generality.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “displaying” or “determining” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing module and/or device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
Certain aspects include process steps and instructions described herein in the form of an algorithm. It should be noted that the process steps and instructions of described herein can be embodied in software, firmware and/or hardware, and when embodied in software, can be downloaded to reside on and be operated from different platforms used by a variety of operating systems.
Some embodiments relate to an apparatus for performing the operations described herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general-purpose computing device selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computing device. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, flash memory, solid state drives, magnetic or optical cards, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), and/or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus. Further, the computing devices referred to herein may include a single processor or may be architectures employing multiple processor designs for increased computing capability.
The algorithms and displays presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computing device, virtualized system, or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may also be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will be apparent from the description provided herein. In addition, the techniques set forth herein are not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the techniques described herein, and any references above to specific languages are provided for illustrative purposes only.
Accordingly, in various embodiments, the techniques described herein can be implemented as software, hardware, and/or other elements for controlling a computer system, computing device, or other electronic device, or any combination or plurality thereof. Such an electronic device can include, for example, a processor, an input device (such as a keyboard, mouse, touchpad, trackpad, joystick, trackball, microphone, and/or any combination thereof), an output device (such as a screen, speaker, and/or the like), memory, long-term storage (such as magnetic storage, optical storage, and/or the like), and/or network connectivity, according to techniques that are well known in the art. Such an electronic device may be portable or nonportable. Examples of electronic devices that may be used for implementing the techniques described herein include: a mobile phone, personal digital assistant, smartphone, kiosk, server computer, enterprise computing device, desktop computer, laptop computer, tablet computer, consumer electronic device, television, set-top box, or the like. An electronic device for implementing the techniques described herein may use any operating system such as, for example: Linux; Microsoft Windows, available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.; Mac OS X, available from Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.; iOS, available from Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.; Android, available from Google, Inc. of Mountain View, Calif.; and/or any other operating system that is adapted for use on the device.
In various embodiments, the techniques described herein can be implemented in a distributed processing environment, networked computing environment, or web-based computing environment. Elements can be implemented on client computing devices, servers, routers, and/or other network or non-network components. In some embodiments, the techniques described herein are implemented using a client/server architecture, wherein some components are implemented on one or more client computing devices and other components are implemented on one or more servers. In one embodiment, in the course of implementing the techniques of the present disclosure, client(s) request content from server(s), and server(s) return content in response to the requests. A browser may be installed at the client computing device for enabling such requests and responses, and for providing a user interface by which the user can initiate and control such interactions and view the presented content.
Any or all of the network components for implementing the described technology may, in some embodiments, be communicatively coupled with one another using any suitable electronic network, whether wired or wireless or any combination thereof, and using any suitable protocols for enabling such communication. One example of such a network is the Internet, although the techniques described herein can be implemented using other networks as well.
While a limited number of embodiments has been described herein, those skilled in the art, having benefit of the above description, will appreciate that other embodiments may be devised which do not depart from the scope of the claims. In addition, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter. Accordingly, the disclosure is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
725567 | Ives | Apr 1903 | A |
4383170 | Takagi et al. | May 1983 | A |
4661986 | Adelson | Apr 1987 | A |
4694185 | Weiss | Sep 1987 | A |
4920419 | Easterly | Apr 1990 | A |
5076687 | Adelson | Dec 1991 | A |
5077810 | D'Luna | Dec 1991 | A |
5157465 | Kronberg | Oct 1992 | A |
5251019 | Moorman et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5282045 | Mimura et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5499069 | Griffith | Mar 1996 | A |
5572034 | Karellas | Nov 1996 | A |
5610390 | Miyano | Mar 1997 | A |
5729471 | Jain et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748371 | Cathey, Jr. et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757423 | Tanaka et al. | May 1998 | A |
5818525 | Elabd | Oct 1998 | A |
5835267 | Mason et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5907619 | Davis | May 1999 | A |
5949433 | Klotz | Sep 1999 | A |
5974215 | Bilbro et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6005936 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021241 | Bilbro et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023523 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028606 | Kolb et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034690 | Gallery et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061083 | Aritake et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061400 | Pearlstein et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069565 | Stern et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075889 | Hamilton, Jr. et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084979 | Kanade et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091860 | Dimitri | Jul 2000 | A |
6097394 | Levoy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115556 | Reddington | Sep 2000 | A |
6137100 | Fossum et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6169285 | Pertrillo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6201899 | Bergen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221687 | Abramovich | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6320979 | Melen | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6424351 | Bishop et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6448544 | Stanton et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466207 | Gortler et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476805 | Shum et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6479827 | Hamamoto et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483535 | Tamburrino et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6529265 | Henningsen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6573912 | Suzuki | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577342 | Webster | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587147 | Li | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597859 | Leinhardt et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606099 | Yamada | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6639596 | Shum | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6658168 | Kim | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674430 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687419 | Atkin | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6768980 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785667 | Orbanes et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6833865 | Fuller et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842297 | Dowski, Jr. et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6900841 | Mihara | May 2005 | B1 |
6924841 | Jones | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6927922 | George et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7003061 | Wiensky | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7015954 | Foote et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7025515 | Woods | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034866 | Colmenarez et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7079698 | Kobayashi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7102666 | Kanade et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7164807 | Morton | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7206022 | Miller et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7239345 | Rogina | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7286295 | Sweatt et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7304670 | Hussey et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7329856 | Ma et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336430 | George | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7417670 | Linzer et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7469381 | Ording | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7477304 | Hu | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7587109 | Reininger | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7620309 | Georgiev | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623726 | Georgiev | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7633513 | Kondo et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7683951 | Aotsuka | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7687757 | Tseng et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7723662 | Levoy et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7724952 | Shum et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7748022 | Frazier | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7847825 | Aoki et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7936377 | Friedhoff et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7936392 | Ng et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7941634 | Georgi | May 2011 | B2 |
7945653 | Zuckerberg et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7949252 | Georgiev | May 2011 | B1 |
7982776 | Dunki-Jacobs et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8013904 | Tan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8085391 | Machida et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8106856 | Matas et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8115814 | Iwase et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8155456 | Babacan | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8155478 | Vitsnudel et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8189089 | Georgiev et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8228417 | Georgiev et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8248515 | Ng et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8259198 | Cote et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8264546 | Witt | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8279325 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289440 | Knight et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290358 | Georgiev | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8310554 | Aggarwal et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315476 | Georgiev et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8345144 | Georgiev et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8400533 | Szedo | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8400555 | Georgiev et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8411948 | Rother | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8427548 | Lim et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8442397 | Kang et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8446516 | Pitts et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8494304 | Venable et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8531581 | Shroff | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542933 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8559705 | Ng | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8570426 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577216 | Li et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8581998 | Ohno | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8589374 | Chaudhri | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8593564 | Border et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8605199 | Imai | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8614764 | Pitts et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8619082 | Ciurea et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8629930 | Brueckner et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8665440 | Kompaniets et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8675073 | Aagaard et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8724014 | Ng et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8736710 | Spielberg | May 2014 | B2 |
8736751 | Yun | May 2014 | B2 |
8749620 | Pitts et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8750509 | Renkis | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8754829 | Lapstun | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8760566 | Pitts et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8768102 | Ng et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8797321 | Bertolami et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8811769 | Pitts et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8831377 | Pitts et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8848970 | Aller et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8860856 | Wetzstein et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8879901 | Caldwell et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8903232 | Caldwell | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8908058 | Akeley et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8948545 | Akeley et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8953882 | Lim et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8971625 | Pitts et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8976288 | Ng et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8988317 | Liang et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8995785 | Knight et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8997021 | Liang et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9001226 | Ng et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9013611 | Szedo | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9106914 | Doser | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9172853 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9184199 | Pitts et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9201193 | Smith | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9210391 | Mills | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9214013 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9294662 | Vondran, Jr. et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9300932 | Knight et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9305375 | Akeley | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9305956 | Pittes et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9386288 | Akeley et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9392153 | Myhre et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9419049 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9467607 | Ng et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9497380 | Jannard et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9628684 | Liang et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9635332 | Carroll et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9639945 | Oberheu et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9647150 | Blasco Claret | May 2017 | B2 |
9681069 | El-Ghoroury et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9774800 | El-Ghoroury et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9858649 | Liang et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9866810 | Knight et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9900510 | Karafin et al. | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9979909 | Kuang et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
20010048968 | Cox et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053202 | Mazess et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020001395 | Davis et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015048 | Nister | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020061131 | Sawhney | May 2002 | A1 |
20020109783 | Hayashi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020159030 | Frey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020199106 | Hayashi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030043270 | Rafey | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030081145 | Seaman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103670 | Schoelkopf et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117511 | Belz et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123700 | Wakao | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030133018 | Ziemkowski | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147252 | Fioravanti | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156077 | Balogh | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040002179 | Barton et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012688 | Tinnerinno et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012689 | Tinnerinno et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040101166 | Williams et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104935 | Williamson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114176 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040135780 | Nims | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040189686 | Tanguay et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040257360 | Sieckmann | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050031203 | Fukuda | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049500 | Babu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050052543 | Li et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080602 | Snyder et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050162540 | Yata | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050212918 | Serra et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050276441 | Debevec | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008265 | Ito | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023066 | Li et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050170 | Tanaka | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056040 | Lan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056604 | Sylthe et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072175 | Oshino | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082879 | Miyoshi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060130017 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060208259 | Jeon | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060250322 | Hall et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256226 | Alon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274210 | Kim | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060285741 | Subbarao | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008317 | Lundstrom | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019883 | Wong et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070030357 | Levien et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033588 | Landsman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070052810 | Monroe | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071316 | Kubo | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070081081 | Cheng | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070097206 | Houvener | May 2007 | A1 |
20070103558 | Cai et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113198 | Robertson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140676 | Nakahara | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070188613 | Norbori et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201853 | Petschnigg | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070229653 | Matusik et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070230944 | Georgiev | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070269108 | Steinberg et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070273795 | Jaynes | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070285554 | Givon | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080007626 | Wernersson | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080012988 | Baharav et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080018668 | Yamauchi | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031537 | Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049113 | Hirai | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056569 | Williams et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080122940 | Mori | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129728 | Satoshi | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080144952 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152215 | Horie et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080168404 | Ording | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080180792 | Georgiev | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187305 | Raskar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193026 | Horie et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205871 | Utagawa | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080226274 | Spielberg | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232680 | Berestov et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080253652 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260291 | Alakarhu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266688 | Errando Smet et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277566 | Utagawa | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080309813 | Watanabe | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316301 | Givon | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090027542 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090041381 | Georgiev et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090041448 | Georgiev et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070710 | Kagaya | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090109280 | Gotsman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090128658 | Hayasaka et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090128669 | Ng et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135258 | Nozaki | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140131 | Utagawa | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090102956 | Georgiev | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185051 | Sano | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185801 | Georgiev et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190022 | Ichimura | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190024 | Hayasaka et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195689 | Hwang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090202235 | Li et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204813 | Kwan | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090207233 | Mauchly et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090273843 | Raskar et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295829 | Georgiev et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090309973 | Kogane | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090309975 | Gordon | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090310885 | Tamaru | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321861 | Oliver et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100003024 | Agrawal et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100021001 | Honsinger et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026852 | Ng et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100050120 | Ohazama et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100060727 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100097444 | Lablans | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103311 | Makii | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107068 | Butcher et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111489 | Presler | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123784 | Ding et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100141780 | Tan et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142839 | Lakus-Becker | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100201789 | Yahagi | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100253782 | Elazary | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100265385 | Knight et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277617 | Hollinger | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100277629 | Tanaka | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303288 | Malone | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328485 | Imamura et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001858 | Shintani | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018903 | Lapstun et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019056 | Hirsch et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110025827 | Shpunt et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032338 | Raveendran et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110050864 | Bond | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110050909 | Ellenby | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069175 | Mistretta et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110075729 | Dane et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110090255 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110091192 | Iwane | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110123183 | Adelsberger et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110129120 | Chan | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110129165 | Lim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110148764 | Gao | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149074 | Lee et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169994 | DiFrancesco et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110205384 | Zamowski et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110221947 | Awazu | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242334 | Wilburn et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242352 | Hikosaka | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249341 | DiFrancesco et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261164 | Olesen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261205 | Sun | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267263 | Hinckley | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110267348 | Lin | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110273466 | Imai et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110279479 | Rodriguez | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110133649 | Bales et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110292258 | Adler | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110293179 | Dikmen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298960 | Tan et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110304745 | Wang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110311046 | Oka | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110316968 | Taguchi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120014837 | Fehr et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120050562 | Perwass et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056889 | Carter et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120057040 | Park et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120057806 | Backlund et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062755 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120132803 | Hirato et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120133746 | Bigioi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147205 | Lelescu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120176481 | Lukk et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188344 | Imai | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120194514 | Sakaguchi | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201475 | Carmel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120206574 | Shikata et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218463 | Benezra et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224787 | Imai | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120229691 | Hiasa et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249529 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249550 | Akeley | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249819 | Imai | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120251131 | Henderson et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120257065 | Velarde et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120257795 | Kim et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271115 | Buerk | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272271 | Nishizawa et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120287246 | Katayama | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120287296 | Fukui | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120287329 | Yahata | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293075 | Engelen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300091 | Shroff et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120237222 | Ng et al. | Dec 2012 | A9 |
20130002902 | Ito | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130002936 | Hirama et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130021486 | Richardson | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130038696 | Ding et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041215 | McDowall | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130044290 | Kawamura | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050546 | Kano | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130064453 | Nagasaka et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130064532 | Caldwell et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130070059 | Kushida | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130070060 | Chatterjee et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077880 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130082905 | Ranieri et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130088616 | Ingrassia, Jr. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130093844 | Shuto | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130093859 | Nakamura | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094101 | Oguchi | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130107085 | Ng et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130113981 | Knight et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120319 | Givon | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120356 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120605 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120636 | Baer | May 2013 | A1 |
20130121577 | Wang | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127901 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128052 | Catrein et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128081 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128087 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130129213 | Shectman | May 2013 | A1 |
20130135448 | Nagumo et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130176481 | Holmes et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130188068 | Said | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130215108 | McMahon et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215226 | Chauvier et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222656 | Kaneko | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130234935 | Griffith | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242137 | Kirkland | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130243391 | Park et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130258451 | El-Ghoroury et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130262511 | Kuffner et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130286236 | Mankowski | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130321574 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130321581 | El-Ghoroury | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130321677 | Cote et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329107 | Burley et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329132 | Tico et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130335596 | Demandoix et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342526 | Ng et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342700 | Kass | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002502 | Han | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140002699 | Guan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003719 | Bai et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140013273 | Ng | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140035959 | Lapstun | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140037280 | Shirakawa | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049663 | Ng et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059462 | Wernersson | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140085282 | Luebke et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140092424 | Grosz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098191 | Rime et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140132741 | Aagaard et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140133749 | Kuo et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139538 | Barber et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140167196 | Heimgartner et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140168484 | Suzuki | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176540 | Tosic et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176592 | Wilburn et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176710 | Brady | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177905 | Grefalda | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140184885 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140192208 | Okincha | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140193047 | Grosz | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195921 | Grosz | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204111 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140211077 | Ng et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140218540 | Geiss et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140226038 | Kimura | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240463 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240578 | Fishman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140245367 | Sasaki | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140267243 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267639 | Tatsuta | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140300753 | Yin | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140313350 | Keelan | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140313375 | Milnar | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140333787 | Venkataraman | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140340390 | Lanman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140347540 | Kang | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140354863 | Ahn et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368494 | Sakharnykh et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368640 | Strandemar et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150062178 | Matas et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150062386 | Sugawara | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150092071 | Meng et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150097985 | Akeley | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150104101 | Bryant et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150124062 | Didyk | May 2015 | A1 |
20150130986 | Ohnishi | May 2015 | A1 |
20150193937 | Georgiev et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150206340 | Munkberg et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150207990 | Ford et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150237273 | Sawadaishi | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150288867 | Kajimura | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150304544 | Eguchi | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150310592 | Kano | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312553 | Ng et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312593 | Akeley et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150346832 | Cole et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150370011 | Ishihara | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150370012 | Ishihara | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150373279 | Osborne | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160029017 | Liang | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160065931 | Konieczny | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160065947 | Cole et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160142615 | Liang et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160155215 | Suzuki | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160165206 | Huang et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160173844 | Knight et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191823 | El-Ghoroury | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160253837 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269620 | Romanenko et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160307368 | Akeley | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160307372 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160309065 | Karafin et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160353006 | Anderson | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160353026 | Blonde et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381348 | Hayasaka | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170031146 | Zheng | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170059305 | Nonn et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170061635 | Oberheu et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170067832 | Ferrara, Jr. et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170078578 | Sato | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170094906 | Liang et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170134639 | Pitts et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170139131 | Karafin et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170221226 | Shen | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170237971 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170243373 | Bevensee et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170244948 | Pang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170256036 | Song et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170263012 | Sabater et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170302903 | Ng et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170358092 | Bleibel et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170365068 | Tan et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170374411 | Lederer et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180007253 | Abe | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180012397 | Carothers | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180020204 | Pang et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180024753 | Gewickey et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180033209 | Akeley et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180034134 | Pang et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180070066 | Knight et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180070067 | Knight et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180082405 | Liang | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180089903 | Pang et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180097867 | Pang et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180158198 | Karnad | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180176483 | Knorr | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180255319 | Thoreau | Sep 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101226292 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101309359 | Nov 2008 | CN |
19624421 | Jan 1997 | DE |
2010020100 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2011135170 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2003052465 | Jun 2003 | WO |
06039486 | Apr 2006 | WO |
07092545 | Aug 2007 | WO |
07092581 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2011010234 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011029209 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011081187 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Haeberli, “A Multifocus Method for Controlling Depth of Field” Graphica Obscura, 1994, pp. 1-3. |
Heidelberg Collaboratory for Image Processing, “Consistent Depth Estimation in a 4D Light Field”, May 2013. |
Kopf, J., et al., Deep Photo: Model-Based Photograph Enhancement and Viewing, SIGGRAPH Asia 2008. |
Levin, A., et al., “Image and Depth from a Conventional Camera with a Coded Aperture”, SIGGRAPH 2007, pp. 1-9. |
Ng, R., et al. “Light Field Photography with a Hand-held Plenoptic Camera,” Stanford Technical Report, CSTR 2005-2, 2005. |
Ng, R., “Digital Light Field Photography,” Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Jun. 2006. |
Ng, R., “Fourier Slice Photography,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2005, vol. 24, No. 3, 2005, pp. 735-744. |
Nguyen, Hubert. “Practical Post-Process Depth of Field.” GPU Gems 3. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley, 2008. |
Tao, Michael, et al., “Depth from Combining Defocus and Correspondence Using Light-Field Cameras”, Dec. 2013. |
Wanner, S., et al., “Variational Light Field Analysis for Disparity Estimation and Super-Resolution”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2013. |
Wanner, S., et al., “Globally Consistent Depth Labeling of 4D Light Fields”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2012. |
Wikipedia—Portable Network Graphics format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Network_Graphics. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Unsharp Mask Technique: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsharp_masking. Retrieved May 3, 2016. |
Wilburn et al., “High Performance Imaging using Large Camera Arrays”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 24, Issue 3 (Jul. 2005), Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2005, pp. 765-776. |
Wilburn, Bennett, et al., “High Speed Video Using a Dense Camera Array”, 2004. |
Wilburn, Bennett, et al., “The Light Field Video Camera”, Proceedings of Media Processors 2002. |
Williams, L. “Pyramidal Parametrics,” Computer Graphic (1983). |
Winnemoller, H., et al., “Light Waving: Estimating Light Positions From Photographs Alone”, Eurographics 2005. |
Wippermann, F. “Chirped Refractive Microlens Array,” Dissertation 2007. |
Wuu, S., et al., “A Manufacturable Back-Side Illumination Technology Using Bulk Si Substrate for Advanced CMOS Image Sensors”, 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop, Bergen, Norway. |
Wuu, S., et al., “BSI Technology with Bulk Si Wafer”, 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop, Bergen, Norway. |
Xiao, Z. et al., “Aliasing Detection and Reduction in Plenoptic Imaging,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2014. |
Xu, Xin et al., “Robust Automatic Focus Algorithm for Low Contrast Images Using a New Contrast Measure,” Sensors 2011; 14 pages. |
Zheng, C. et al., “Parallax Photography: Creating 3D Cinematic Effects from Stills”, Proceedings of Graphic Interface, 2009. |
Zitnick, L. et al., “High-Quality Video View Interpolation Using a Layered Representation,” Aug. 2004; ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2004; vol. 23, Issue 3; pp. 600-608. |
Zoberbier, M., et al., “Wafer Cameras—Novel Fabrication and Packaging Technologies”, 2009 International Image Senor Workshop, Bergen, Norway, 5 pages. |
Primesense, “The Primesense 3D Awareness Sensor”, 2007. |
Ramamoorthi, R., et al, “Frequency space environment map rendering” ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH 2002 proceedings) 21, 3, 517-526. |
Ramamoorthi, R., et al., “An efficient representation for irradiance environment maps”, in Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, 497-500. |
Raskar, Ramesh et al., “Glare Aware Photography: 4D Ray Sampling for Reducing Glare Effects of Camera Lenses,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, Aug. 2008; vol. 27, Issue 3; pp. 1-10. |
Raskar, Ramesh et al., “Non-photorealistic Camera: Depth Edge Detection and Stylized Rendering using Multi-Flash Imaging”, SIGGRAPH 2004. |
Raytrix, “Raytrix Lightfield Camera,” Raytrix GmbH, Germany 2012, pp. 1-35. |
Roper Scientific, Germany “Fiber Optics,” 2012. |
Scharstein, Daniel, et al., “High-Accuracy Stereo Depth Maps Using Structured Light,” CVPR'03 Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Computer Society, pp. 195-202. |
Schirmacher, H. et al., “High-Quality Interactive Lumigraph Rendering Through Warping,” May 2000, Graphics Interface 2000. |
Shade, Jonathan, et al., “Layered Depth Images”, SIGGRAPH 98, pp. 1-2. |
Shreiner, OpenGL Programming Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 8, 2010. |
Simpleviewer, “Tiltview”, http://simpleviewer.net/tiltviewer. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Skodras, A. et al., “The JPEG 2000 Still Image Compression Standard,” Sep. 2001, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pp. 36-58. |
Sloan, P., et al., “Precomputed radiance transfer for real-time rendering in dynamic, low-frequency lighting environments”, ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 527-536, 2002. |
Snavely, Noah, et al., “Photo-tourism: Exploring Photo collections in 3D”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Proceedings), 2006. |
Sokolov, “Autostereoscopy and Integral Photography by Professor Lippmann's Method” , 1911, pp. 23-29. |
Sony Corp, “Interchangeable Lens Digital Camera Handbook”, 2011. |
Sony, Sony's First Curved Sensor Photo: http://www.engadget.com; Jul. 2014. |
Stensvold, M., “Hybrid AF: A New Approach to Autofocus Is Emerging for both Still and Video”, Digital Photo Magazine, Nov. 13, 2012. |
Story, D., “The Future of Photography”, Optics Electronics, Oct. 2008. |
Sun, Jian, et al., “Stereo Matching Using Belief Propagation”, 2002. |
Tagging photos on Flickr, Facebook and other online photo sharing sites (see, for example, http://support.gnip.com/customer/portal/articles/809309-flickr-geo-photos-tag-search). Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Takahashi, Keita, et al., “All in-focus View Synthesis from Under-Sampled Light Fields”, ICAT 2003, Tokyo, Japan. |
Tanida et al., “Thin observation module by bound optics (TOMBO): concept and experimental verification” Applied Optics 40, 11 (Apr. 10, 2001), pp. 1806-1813. |
Techcrunch, “Coolinis”, Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Teo, P., et al., “Efficient linear rendering for interactive light design”, Tech. Rep. STAN-CS-TN-97-60, 1998, Stanford University. |
Teranishi, N. “Evolution of Optical Structure in Images Sensors,” Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2012 IEEE International; Dec. 10-13, 2012. |
Vaish et al., “Using plane + parallax for calibrating dense camera arrays”, In Proceedings CVPR 2004, pp. 2-9. |
Vaish, V., et al., “Synthetic Aperture Focusing Using a Shear-Warp Factorization of the Viewing Transform,” Workshop on Advanced 3D Imaging for Safety and Security (in conjunction with CVPR 2005), 2005. |
VR Playhouse, “The Surrogate,” http://www.vrplayhouse.com/the-surrogate. |
Wenger, et al, “Performance Relighting and Reflectance Transformation with Time-Multiplexed Illumination”, Institute for Creative Technologies, SIGGRAPH 2005. |
Wetzstein, Gordon, et al., “Sensor Saturation in Fourier Multiplexed Imaging”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2010). |
Wikipedia—Adaptive Optics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/adaptive_optics. Retrieved Feb. 2014. |
Wikipedia—Autofocus systems and methods: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autofocus. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Bayer Filter: http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer_filter. Retrieved Jun. 20, 2013. |
Wikipedia—Color Image Pipeline: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/color_image_pipeline. Retrieved Jan. 15, 2014. |
Wikipedia—Compression standard JPEG XR: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XR. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—CYGM Filter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CYGM _filter. Retrieved Jun. 20, 2013. |
Wikipedia—Data overlay techniques for real-time visual feed. For example, heads-up displays: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head-up_display. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Exchangeable image file format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchangeable_image_file_format. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Expeed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EXPEED. Retrieved Jan. 15, 2014. |
Wikipedia—Extensible Metadata Platform: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Metadata_Platform. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Key framing for video animation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_frame. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Lazy loading of image data: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazy_loading. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Methods of Variable Bitrate Encoding: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_bitrate#Methods_of VBR_encoding. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/967,076, filed Apr. 30, 2018 listing Jiantao Kuang et al. as inventors, entitled “Automatic Lens Flare Detection and Correction for Light-Field Images”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/666,298, filed Aug. 1, 2017 listing Yonggang Ha et al. as inventors, entitled “Focal Reducer With Controlled Optical Properties for Interchangeable Lens Light-Field Camera”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,808, filed May 9, 2017 listing Alex Song et al. as inventors, entitled “Adaptive Control for Immersive Experience Delivery”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/864,938, filed Jan. 8, 2018 listing Jon Karafin et al. as inventors, entitled “Motion Blur for Light-Field Images”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/703,553, filed Sep. 13, 2017 listing Jon Karafin et al. as inventors, entitled “4D Camera Tracking and Optical Stabilization”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,841, filed May 9, 2017 listing Kurt Akeley et al. as inventors, entitled “Vantage Generation and Interactive Playback”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,951, filed May 9, 2017 lisiting Alex Song et al. as inventors, entitled “Wedge-Based Light-Field Video Capture”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/944,551, filed Apr. 3, 2018 listing Zejing Wang et al. as inventors, entitled “Generating Dolly Zoom Effect Using Light Field Image Data”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/874,723, filed Jan. 18, 2018 listing Mark Weir et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-Camera Navigation Interface”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,994, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Trevor Carothers et al. as inventors, entitled “Generation of Virtual Reality with 6 Degrees of Freesom From Limited Viewer Data”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,836, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Francois Bleibel et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Contour Tracking”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,942, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Francois Bleibel et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Contour Tracking With Grabcut”. |
Adelsberger, R. et al., “Spatially Adaptive Photographic Flash,” ETH Zurich, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report 612, 2008, pp. 1-12. |
Adelson et al., “Single Lens Stereo with a Plenoptic Camera” IEEE Translation on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Feb. 1992. vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 99-106. |
Adelson, E. H., and Bergen, J. R. 1991. The plenoptic function and the elements of early vision. In Computational Models of Visual Processing, edited by Michael S. Landy and J. Anthony Movshon. Cambridge, Mass.: mit Press. |
Adobe Systems Inc, “XMP Specification”, Sep. 2005. |
Adobe, “Photoshop CS6 / in depth: Digital Negative (DNG)”, http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.displayTab2html. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Agarwala, A., et al., “Interactive Digital Photomontage,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2004, vol. 32, No. 3, 2004. |
Andreas Observatory, Spectrograph Manual: IV. Flat-Field Correction, Jul. 2006. |
Apple, “Apple iPad: Photo Features on the iPad”, Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Bae, S., et al., “Defocus Magnification”, Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 26, Issue 3 (Proc. of Eurographics 2007), pp. 1-9. |
Belhumeur, Peter et al., “The Bas-Relief Ambiguity”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1997, pp. 1060-1066. |
Belhumeur, Peter, et al., “The Bas-Relief Ambiguity”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1999, pp. 33-44, revised version. |
Bhat, P. et al. “GradientShop: A Gradient-Domain Optimization Framework for Image and Video Filtering,” SIGGRAPH 2010; 14 pages. |
Bolles, R., et al., “Epipolar-Plane Image Analysis: An Approach to Determining Structure from Motion”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1, 7-55 (1987). |
Bourke, Paul, “Image filtering in the Frequency Domain,” pp. 1-9, Jun. 1998. |
Canon, Canon Speedlite wireless flash system, User manual for Model 550EX, Sep. 1998. |
Chai, Jin-Xang et al., “Plenoptic Sampling”, ACM SIGGRAPH 2000, Annual Conference Series, 2000, pp. 307-318. |
Chen, S. et al., “A CMOS Image Sensor with On-Chip Image Compression Based on Predictive Boundary Adaptation and Memoryless QTD Algorithm,” Very Large Scalee Integration (VLSI) Systems, IEEE Transactions, vol. 19, Issue 4; Apr. 2011. |
Chen, W., et al., “Light Field mapping: Efficient representation and hardware rendering of surface light fields”, ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 447-456, 2002. |
Cohen, Noy et al., “Enhancing the performance of the light field microscope using wavefront coding,” Optics Express, vol. 22, issue 20; 2014. |
Daly, D., “Microlens Arrays” Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Debevec, et al, “A Lighting Reproduction Approach to Live-Action Compoisting” Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2002. |
Debevec, P., et al., “Acquiring the reflectance field of a human face”, SIGGRAPH 2000. |
Debevec, P., et al., “Recovering high dynamic radiance maps from photographs”, SIGGRAPH 1997, 369-378. |
Design of the xBox menu. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Digital Photography Review, “Sony Announce new RGBE CCD,” Jul. 2003. |
Dorsey, J., et al., “Design and simulation of opera light and projection effects”, in Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 91), vol. 25, 41-50. |
Dorsey, J., et al., “Interactive design of complex time dependent lighting”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 15, 2 (Mar. 1995), 26-36. |
Dowski et al., “Wavefront coding: a modern method of achieving high performance and/or low cost imaging systems” SPIE Proceedings, vol. 3779, Jul. 1999, pp. 137-145. |
Dowski, Jr. “Extended Depth of Field Through Wave-Front Coding,” Applied Optics, vol. 34, No. 11, Apr. 10, 1995; pp. 1859-1866. |
Duparre, J. et al., “Micro-Optical Artificial Compound Eyes,” Institute of Physics Publishing, Apr. 2006. |
Eisemann, Elmar, et al., “Flash Photography Enhancement via Intrinsic Relighting”, SIGGRAPH 2004. |
Fattal, Raanan, et al., “Multiscale Shape and Detail Enhancement from Multi-light Image Collections”, SIGGRAPH 2007. |
Fernando, Randima, “Depth of Field—A Survey of Techniques,” GPU Gems. Boston, MA; Addison-Wesley, 2004. |
Fitzpatrick, Brad, “Camlistore”, Feb. 1, 2011. |
Fujifilm, Super CCD EXR Sensor by Fujifilm, brochure reference No. EB-807E, 2008. |
Georgiev, T. et al., “Reducing Plenoptic Camera Artifacts,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 1955-1968; 2010. |
Georgiev, T., et al., “Spatio-Angular Resolution Tradeoff in Integral Photography,” Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2006. |
Meng, J. et al., “An Approach on Hardware Design for Computational Photography Applications Based on Light Field Refocusing Algorithm,” Nov. 18, 2007, 12 pages. |
Georgiev, T., et al., “Suppersolution with Plenoptic 2.0 Cameras,” Optical Society of America 2009; pp. 1-3. |
Georgiev, T., et al., “Unified Frequency Domain Analysis of Lightfield Cameras” (2008). |
Georgiev, T., et al., Plenoptic Camera 2.0 (2008). |
Girod, B., “Mobile Visual Search”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Jul. 2011. |
Gortler et al., “The lumigraph” SIGGRAPH 96, pp. 43-54. |
Groen et al., “A Comparison of Different Focus Functions for Use in Autofocus Algorithms,” Cytometry 6:81-91, 1985. |
Heide, F. et al., “High-Quality Computational Imaging Through Simple Lenses,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, SIGGRAPH 2013; pp. 1-7. |
Hirigoyen, F., et al., “1.1 um Backside Imager vs. Frontside Image: an optics-dedicated FDTD approach”, IEEE 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop. |
Huang, Fu-Chung et al., “Eyeglasses-free Display: Towards Correcting Visual Aberrations with Computational Light Field Displays,” ACM Transaction on Graphics, Aug. 2014, pp. 1-12. |
Isaksen, A., et al., “Dynamically Reparameterized Light Fields,” SIGGRAPH 2000, pp. 297-306. |
Ives H., “Optical properties of a Lippman lenticulated sheet,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 21, 171 (1931). |
Ives, H. “Parallax Panoramagrams Made with a Large Diameter Lens”, Journal of the Optical Society of America; 1930. |
Jackson et al., “Selection of a Convolution Function for Fourier Inversion Using Gridding” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Sep. 1991, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 473-478. |
Kautz, J., et al., “Fast arbitrary BRDF shading for low-frequency lighting using spherical harmonics”, in Eurographic Rendering Workshop 2002, 291-296. |
Koltun, et al., “Virtual Occluders: An Efficient Interediate PVS Representation”, Rendering Techniques 2000: Proc. 11th Eurographics Workshop Rendering, pp. 59-70, Jun. 2000. |
Lehtinen, J., et al. “Matrix radiance transfer”, in Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 59-64, 2003. |
Lesser, Michael, “Back-Side Illumination”, 2009. |
Levoy et al.,“Light Field Rendering” SIGGRAPH 96 Proceeding, 1996. pp. 31-42. |
Levoy, “Light Fields and Computational Imaging” IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 2006, pp. 46-55. |
Levoy, M. “Light Field Photography and Videography,” Oct. 18, 2005. |
Levoy, M. “Stanford Light Field Microscope Project,” 2008; http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/lfmicroscope/, 4 pages. |
Levoy, M., “Autofocus: Contrast Detection”, http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs178/applets/autofocusPD.html, pp. 1-3, 2010. |
Levoy, M., “Autofocus: Phase Detection”, http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs178/applets/autofocusPD.html, pp. 1-3, 2010. |
Levoy, M., et al., “Light Field Microscopy,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 25, No. 3, Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2006. |
Liang, Chia-Kai, et al., “Programmable Aperture Photography: Multiplexed Light Field Acquisition”, ACM SIGGRAPH, 2008. |
Lippmann, “Reversible Prints”, Communication at the French Society of Physics, Journal of Physics, 7 , 4, Mar. 1908, pp. 821-825. |
Lumsdaine et al., “Full Resolution Lightfield Rendering” Adobe Technical Report Jan. 2008, pp. 1-12. |
Maeda, Y. et al., “A CMOS Image Sensor with Pseudorandom Pixel Placement for Clear Imaging,” 2009 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems, Dec. 2009. |
Magnor, M. et al., “Model-Aided Coding of Multi-Viewpoint Image Data,” Proceedings IEEE Conference on Image Processing, ICIP-2000, Vancouver, Canada, Sep. 2000. https://graphics.tu-bs.de/static/people/magnor/publications/icip00.pdf. |
Mallat, Stephane, “A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing”, Academic Press 1998. |
Malzbender, et al., “Polynomial Texture Maps”, Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2001. |
Marshall, Richard J. et al., “Improving Depth Estimation from a Plenoptic Camera by Patterned Illumination,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 9528, 2015, pp. 1-6. |
Masselus, Vincent, et al., “Relighting with 4D Incident Light Fields”, SIGGRAPH 2003. |
Meynants, G., et al., “Pixel Binning in CMOS Image Sensors,” Frontiers in Electronic Imaging Conference, 2009. |
Moreno-Noguer, F. et al., “Active Refocusing of Images and Videos,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Aug. 2007; pp. 1-9. |
Munkberg, J. et al., “Layered Reconstruction for Defocus and Motion Blur” EGSR 2014, pp. 1-12. |
Naemura et al., “3-D Computer Graphics based on Integral Photography” Optics Express, Feb. 12, 2001. vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 255-262. |
Nakamura, J., “Image Sensors and Signal Processing for Digital Still Cameras” (Optical Science and Engineering), 2005. |
National Instruments, “Anatomy of a Camera,” pp. 1-5, Sep. 6, 2006. |
Nayar, Shree, et al., “Shape from Focus”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 824-831, Aug. 1994. |
Ng, R., et al., “All-Frequency Shadows Using Non-linear Wavelet Lighting Approximation. ACM Transactions on Graphics,” ACM Transactions on Graphics; Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2003. |
Ng, R., et al., “Triple Product Wavelet Integrals for All-Frequency Relighting”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2004). |
Nimeroff, J., et al., “Efficient rendering of naturally illuminatied environments” in Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 359-373, 1994. |
Nokia, “City Lens”, May 2012. |
Ogden, J., “Pyramid-Based Computer Graphics”, 1985. |
Okano et al., “Three-dimensional video system based on integral photography” Optical Engineering, Jun. 1999. vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1072-1077. |
Orzan, Alexandrina, et al., “Diffusion Curves: A Vector Representation for Smooth-Shaded Images,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2008; vol. 27; 2008. |
Pain, B., “Back-Side Illumination Technology for SOI-CMOS Image Sensors”, 2009. |
Perez, Patrick et al., “Poisson Image Editing,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2003; vol. 22, Issue 3; Jul. 2003; pp. 313-318. |
Petschnigg, George, et al., “Digial Photography with Flash and No-Flash Image Pairs”, SIGGRAPH 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180342075 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |