There is described an apparatus that enables real-time conversion and transmission of data between Serial protocols and Ethernet protocols. The real-time conversion can be expanded to also include radio protocols.
There are many examples of Serial to Ethernet conversion. By way of example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,881,096 (Lantronix, Inc.) titled “Compact serial-to-ethernet conversion port”, describes the method by which Serial data signals may be converted to Ethernet, and vice versa. By way of U.S. Patent 20090196621 A1, titled “Fiber-optic to USB Ethernet converter”, which aims to describe high-speed data conversion from USB data signals to Ethernet data signals.
Many systems exist in the retail, industrial, and scientific field, which utilize the Serial interface as their primary method of communication between devices. A good example of this is in the retail market, where nearly all businesses utilize barcode readers, which scan the barcode on the product and transmit them to the computer system used by the business. The technology in this patent would enable store owners to monitor the data passing through the barcode reader, and even send barcode data to other computer systems when there is no physical barcode reader connected. Considering that sensitive information, such as credit-card numbers, are not transmitted over these interfaces, it provides a safe method of collecting analytic data without risking the privacy of the user.
Many systems transmit and receive information via the Serial interface known as RS-232. RS-232, RS-485, etc . . . are the primary protocols that this patent aims to convert to other protocols, but is not limited to these protocol.
The feasibility of Serial and USB to Ethernet conversion has been well established. There exist integrated circuits which may be used to convert serial and USB signals to Ethernet. While this has been well established, there exist no systems which can convert data streams bi-directionally between multiple interfaces. We propose a system which provides multi-directional communication between a Serial interface and an Ethernet interface. The real-time conversion can also include radio protocols. There can also be optional data modification before converting between interfaces.
There is provided a Serial-Ethernet data conversion apparatus which includes a printed circuit board, a microcontroller controlling operations on the printed circuit board and a power input connection for providing power to components on the printed circuit board. One or more serial interface is provided along with an Ethernet interface. The microcontroller is programmed to convert a signal input received via the one or more serial interface to a signal output via one of the Ethernet interface and to convert a signal input received via the Ethernet interface to a signal output via the one or more serial interface.
The utility of the apparatus may be expanded by also providing one or more radio communications interfaces, such as but not limited to, WiFi or Bluetooth.
Using a variety of discreet integrated circuits (ICs) connected together on a printed circuit board (PCB), the Serial data or Radio data is converted to Ethernet packets, which can be transmitted over now-ubiquitous Ethernet connections to computers in the same location, or even across long distances (such as between countries). Other interfaces may be added to the device, and data flow from any interface to any other interface may occur.
The conversion system consists of a PCB with appropriate interface connectors, a power jack, and interface for programming the device. The PCB also has IC packages soldered onto the surface of the PCB, which provide the functionality of the board.
The PCB has a programming interface which allows software to be loaded onto the microcontroller. This software defines under what circumstances the board should send data to the target address on the Ethernet system, and controls systems such as the power management sub-circuit. The software may also modify data on the fly while transmitting it from one interface to another. For example, a device monitoring Serial data from a printer and converting it to Ethernet packets may ignore all data not relevant to the specific application.
The system can also contain the necessary components to utilize Power over Ethernet technologies, which eliminate the need for a power connector, and provide power to the device via the Ethernet connection, if the Ethernet network utilizes the feature.
With the systems in place with the previously referenced patents, there exist only half-duplex communication between interfaces. This means that the two interfaces in question (eg: Serial and Ethernet, or USB and Ethernet) may only transmit data from one interface to the other at the same time. Two streams of data, from A to B and B to A simultaneously, is not possible. Furthermore, previous systems are not pass-through, meaning that data passing through the interfaces ends at the device, and does not continue through the device to another plug of the same interface. Our proposed system would have no limits on how the data may be transmitted. For example, data coming in from the USB jack could be sent to the Serial jack, as well as the Ethernet jack. It could even be sent to other devices via the Ethernet connection, and data coming in through the USB connection could fan out (via Ethernet) to 5 devices on the network, where the data is then piped out of the Serial jack. The combinations do not have limit, and are defined by the software uploaded to the device via the programming header. This is the main differentiating factor between this device and previous patents.
In addition, due to the configuration of the ICs on the PCB, certain connections may be electrically isolated from others. This would enable the device to be electrically “invisible” under certain circumstances. This means that the system being monitored electrically behaves no differently than if the monitor was not connected at all. This is accomplished by having this apparatus placed inline between the sending and receiving device. The pass-through feature allows for the devices to communicate unimpeded, while a digital copy of the interaction is created and used as defined by the loaded software.
The apparatus described enables the device to passively monitor interface connections, or act as a system which intercepts the signals and modifies the data before passing it along to other interfaces. The behavior of the device is defined by the software and may be changed at any time without hardware modification. Data interception would allow, for example, a printing system to become paperless by re-rerouting print jobs to a database. This would remove the need to physically print the information in question, but data would still be stored electronically, and would require no modifications of the host system besides installing the device between the host computer and the printer.
These and other features will become more apparent from the following description in which reference is made to the appended drawings, the drawings are for the purpose of illustration only and are not intended to be in any way limiting, wherein:
Structure and Relationship of Parts:
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In this patent document, the word “comprising” is used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items following the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded. A reference to an element by the indefinite article “a” does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the element is present, unless the context clearly requires that there be one and only one of the elements.
The scope of the claims should not be limited by the illustrated embodiments set forth as examples, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with a purposive construction of the claims in view of the description as a whole.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2942079 | Sep 2016 | CA | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6881096 | Brown et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7018242 | Brown et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
9081903 | Biondi et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20050097369 | Bowser | May 2005 | A1 |
20050154799 | Feng et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070028018 | Giroud et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070091168 | Lee | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080276032 | Iida | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090180421 | Hall | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196621 | Chen | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100030925 | Inoue | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110026525 | He | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110265156 | Bombay | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120191894 | Sasaki | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20140354888 | Nakamura | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150311753 | Scifres | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20170069214 | Dupray | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170154001 | Filser | Jun 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1536776 | Oct 2004 | CN |
101673107 | Mar 2010 | CN |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180084089 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |