This disclosure relates generally to materials used for making balloon membranes.
Balloons can be used for putting unmanned equipment in upper atmosphere. High-altitude balloon have been used for gathering weather data. More recently, there have been attempts for providing network and communication services using high-altitude balloons. Generally, the size of balloon is determined by the desired height and the payload accompanying the balloon. As the utility of the balloons increases in complexity, so does the weight of the payload accompanying the balloon. For example, a balloon designed to provide communication services would be accompanied by a payload including, among other things, one or more antennas, power supply electronics, energy storage, and electronics designed to provide communication services. As the payload size increases, the balloon size must also increase, leading to higher cost of launch. Moreover, regulation from government agencies such as the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) may limit the weight payload allowed to be attached to a balloon. As such, balloon membranes that can perform multiple functions are desirable.
Among other things, this disclosure provides embodiments of systems and methods for assuring compliance of lighter-than-air devices carrying payloads with aviation regulations.
In an embodiment, a lighter-than-air (LTA) device is described. The device may include a membrane comprised of a flexible substrate; and an active material disposed on at least a portion of the flexible substrate, wherein the active material is configured to controllably change the surface area of at least a portion of the flexible substrate when an electrical stimulus is applied to the active material.
In various embodiments, other active materials may be incorporated within, or disposed on the membrane and/or the flexible substrate.
In the present disclosure, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof. In the drawings, similar symbols typically identify similar components, unless context dictates otherwise. Various embodiments described in the detailed description, drawings, and claims are illustrative and not meant to be limiting. Other embodiments may be used, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject matter presented herein. It will be understood that the aspects of the present disclosure, as generally described herein, and illustrated in the Figures, can be arranged, substituted, combined, separated, and designed in a wide variety of different configurations, all of which are contemplated herein.
Before the present methods and systems are described, it is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited to the particular processes, methods and devices described herein, as these may vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing the particular versions or embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure which will be limited only by the appended claims. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meanings as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.
It must also be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to an “antenna” is a reference to one or more antennas and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth. Nothing in this disclosure is to be construed as an admission that the embodiments described in this disclosure are not entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior invention. As used in this document, the term “comprising” means “including, but not limited to.”
As used herein, the term “lighter-than-air device”, interchangeably used with the terms “LTA device”, “balloon”, “ballooncraft”, or “unmanned ballooncraft”, refers to a device that has an average density less than that of air at the sea-level. Therefore, buoyant forces pushing an LTA device up are greater than its gravitational pull. An LTA device, therefore, rises if allowed to freely float.
A “free-floating platform” as used herein refers to a platform freely floating in earth's atmosphere without substantial control over longitudinal or latitudinal movement. A free floating platform, in various embodiments, may include an LTA gas enclosure and a payload.
As used herein, “float location” of an LTA device refers to the location with respect to earth's surface (e.g., latitude and longitude coordinates, and such) at which the LTA device is floating in the earth's atmosphere. “Float altitude” refers to the height with respect to sea level, at which the LTA device is floating.
“Rise rate”, interchangeably used with the term “ascent rate” of the LTA device refers to the rate at which the LTA device rises in the earth's atmosphere. Ascent rate is typically measured in feet/minute or meters/minute. Likewise, “descent rate” refers to the rate at which the LTA device descends from the earth's atmosphere towards the earth's surface.
“Aircraft”, interchangeably used with the term “powered aircraft”, as used herein refers to a “heavier-than-air” machine that is able to fly by gaining support from the air and has a source of mechanical power available for steering or propulsion.
As used herein, a processor refers to a machine for data processing. For example, the processor could be a microprocessor chip.
Unmanned lighter-than-air ballooncraft have been used for many years to perform tasks such as near space research and meteorological measurements. Such ballooncraft have even carried payloads with instrumentation that sometimes includes radio transmission capabilities.
There are numerous types of low-density gas enclosure devices, and particularly balloons, that might be considered useful for the devices and systems described herein. Among the potentially preferred types of balloons are rubber pressure balloons, zero pressure balloons, internal air bladder balloons, adjustable volume balloons and super pressure balloons. Each type of these balloons has different advantages and disadvantages and, for purposes of presently disclosed embodiments, it has been found that the rubber pressure balloon is most preferred and the zero pressure balloon is also considered a preferred alternative.
The rubber pressure balloons have a stretchable rubber membrane containing the lifting gas that allows the balloon to increase in size as the external air pressure decreases as the balloon rises. This is the most common type of weather balloon and is also consistent with party balloons. The primary advantage is the low cost and common accessibility so that high quality balloons of this type, such as weather balloons, are available at low cost. These balloons are somewhat fragile and they have delicate handling requirements and also low extended reliability. Further, the use of such balloons requires venting of the lifting gas to prevent bursting upon reaching maximum altitudes.
The zero pressure balloons consist of an initially loose bag, usually made from a plastic such as polyethylene or Mylar. As the external air pressure decreases, the bag increases in volume. Once the bag reaches its whole volume, gas must be vented or the balloon will burst as the bag material does not stretch. Although this type of balloon may be more reliable than the rubber balloons and provide less diffusion of the lifting gas, it is of a median cost, more costly than the rubber balloons, currently between about four to ten times more expensive. Thus, although the rubber balloon might be more preferred for purposes of low cost platforms, the zero pressure balloon also provides a useful enclosure for lifting the platform up and has certain advantages over the rubber pressure balloons.
Internal air bladder balloons consist of a flexible balloon containing air enclosed in a fixed volume balloon contain a lifting gas. Air is pumped into the inner-flexible balloon, which compresses the lifting gas trapped in the fixed volume balloon, thereby decreasing the overall lift. Air is let out of the inner-flexible balloon to increase lift. Blimps adjust lift using this principle. This type of balloon has certain advantages as there is no lift gas lost when reducing lift and it is potentially more reliable than rubber balloons, however it is more costly due to extra balloon, pump and extra required power for operating the increase and decrease of lift mechanism.
Adjustable volume balloons consist of a fixed volume containing the lifting gas and a mechanical way of reducing the volume of the balloon. By decreasing the volume, the lifting gas is compressed and the lift decreases. The volume may be reduced any number of ways, including an adjustable line inside the balloon from the top of the balloon volume decreases. This has less diffusion of the lifting gas, theoretically, lifting gas is not lost when reducing lift and it may be more reliable than rubber balloons. However, it has a significantly more costly due to the mechanical volume reducing mechanism and further, requires extra power for operation of such a mechanical volume-reducing mechanism.
Super pressure balloons have a fixed volume. They are called super pressure balloons because they do not expand to match the decreasing exterior pressure. They are built strong enough to hold the increased pressure. The balloons can achieve extremely long float lives because they do not need to vent gas to prevent bursting and they typically have very low membrane gas diffusion. This type of balloon is the highest cost, although one of the most reliable, with little loss of lifting gas. The extreme high cost and difficulty of manufacture and the lack of developed technology regarding such balloons, indicates that other alternatives are currently more attractive.
In various embodiments, the payload may include, without limitation: communication electronics such as one or more antennas and routers; one or more processors; one or more batteries; one or more power supplies; an on-board data storage such as a memory; one or more photovoltaic cells or panels; radar system(s); a positioning system such as a global positioning system or a star-tracking system; motion sensors such as accelerometers, magnetometers, gyroscopes, etc.; optical systems such as lights, video and/or still cameras; environmental sensors for measuring e.g., pressure, humidity, temperature, altitude, and/or wind-speed; an altitude control system; a launch and/or recovery window prediction system; a payload splitting system; and the like.
Embodiment in
Communications are controlled by processor 430, preferably using both a 900 MHZ transceiver and modem 480 and a Gateway transceiver and modem 482 signal to and from co-linear array antennae 484 are interfaced through a diplexer 486 control information received at co-linear array antennae 484, therefore transferred through the diplexer and one of the appropriate frequency transceivers to the processor 430 with input information from ground signals and also from input information from the onboard sensors as provided through A/D converter 444, the GPS position information from 476, the GPS time information 478 and the attitude sensor information 466, various functions of the LTA device can be controlled. Including the gas vent at block 488 corresponding to the gas vent actuator 370. Also the ballast drop is controlled at block 490 corresponding to the physical ballast drop actuator 372. The meteorological package drop controlled schematically at block 492 corresponding to the package drop actuator 374. The balloon destruct control is depicted at block 494 corresponding to the destruct actuator 376. Antennae stabilization may be affected according to controls at block 496 corresponding to the antennae stabilization mechanism 316. Payload temperature controls, both heating and cooling, may be controlled at block 498 corresponding to heaters and coolers 364. Additional functions as may be additionally included, are provided with controls at block 500.
It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that depending on the purpose of the LTA device, the payload can be fairly heavy. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has limited the weight of ballooncraft payload to 6 pounds unless they follow strict reporting, launching, location reporting, and lighting guidelines. These limitations may be found in the FAA CFR Title 14, Part 101. Launches are not allowed through broken cloud layers, and aircraft transponders must be carried. These restrictions would not allow for launches through all weather conditions as would be required for robust and time-sensitive missions. The transponder and lighting requirements would take up over half the weight requirement, leaving little for the mission payload weight.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) prohibits uncontrolled transmitters as they may cause interference to users on the same frequency or others on nearby frequencies. FCC spectrum licenses generally prohibit a US licensed transmitter from transmitting when it leaves the border of the US.
It has been found that most lighter-than-air platforms that maintain altitude must drop ballast in order to maintain altitude as lifting gas is lost through the balloon membrane and as the heating effect of the sun is lost as night approaches. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations Section 101.7 states that unmanned ballooncraft are prohibited from dropping objects or operation such that a hazard may occur.
Sec. 101.7 Hazardous Operations.
(a) No person may operate any moored balloon, kite, unmanned rocket, or unmanned free balloon in a manner that creates a hazard to other persons, or their property.
(b) No person operating any moored balloon, kite, unmanned rocket, or unmanned free balloon may allow an object to be dropped there from, if such action creates a hazard to other persons or their property.
A major factor influencing the size and cost of a lighter-than-air platform is the weight of the payload. For small ballooncraft such as weather balloons, they may become exempt from certain FAA reporting, lighting, and launching requirements if the total payload weight is kept below 6 pounds and a density of 3 ounces or less per square inch of the smallest side.
Sec. 101.1 (4) Applicability.
This part prescribes rules governing the operation in the United States, of the following:
. . . .
(4) Except as provided for in Sec. 101.7, any unmanned free balloon that—
(i) Carries a payload package that weighs more than four pounds and has a weight/size ratio of more than three ounces per square inch on any surface of the package, determined by dividing the total weight in ounces of the payload package by the area in square inches of its smallest surface;
(ii) Carries a payload package that weighs more than six pounds;
Presently, the problem described is solved by (a) limiting payload weight and density to be exempt from FAR 10, which significantly limits the payload weight and density; (b) meeting the requirements of FAR 101, which is expensive, requires reporting of each flight, a transponder and power supply, has lighting requirements, limits the launches to daytime, and other restrictions that would severely impact operations; or (c) applying for a waiver, which have generally only been granted for specific flights, and not large groups of flights.
All commercial aircraft, all instrument flight rules (DR) aircraft, all aircraft operating in Class B or C airspace, and all aircraft operating above 18,000 feet are required to carry an aviation transponder. Every time a transponder-equipped aircraft is “painted” by FAA radar, the transponder transmits its current altitude and identification code. This allows the radar to determine not only the aircraft's position, but also the aircraft altitude and identification.
Disclosed herein are devices, systems and methods for reducing the payload weight on an LTA device to assure compliance with aviation regulations. In one embodiment, the one or more of the components that are typically carried with the LTA device in its payload are designed to be part of the LTA gas enclosure (e.g., balloon membrane). In some embodiments, the LTA gas enclosure is configured to work as an altitude control device by incorporating, in at least a portion of the LTA gas enclosure, an active material that is configured to controllably change its surface area.
In an embodiment, the LTA gas enclosure may be made from a flexible material such as latex rubber, silicone, or other suitable elastomers.
In an embodiment, the flexible material is biaxially stretched along its surface to prepare a pre-stretched substrate that. The biaxial stretch may be applied symmetrically or asymmetrically along both axes. Large area graphene sheets are then disposed on both sides of the pre-stretched substrate surface using any suitable method known in the art such that the elastomer is sandwiched between the graphene sheets. The graphene sheets may be disposed on the entire pre-stretched substrate or only on a portion of the substrate. The pre-stretched substrate is then allowed to relax.
An electrical connection suitable for applying large voltages is provided to the graphene sheets. When a voltage is applied to the graphene sheets, the elastomer substrate develops an electric field that induces Maxwell stress in the graphene sheets. The Maxwell stress deforms the graphene sheets by reducing their thickness and increase its area. The area of the graphene sheets is increased by up to 100% under Maxwell stress. The deformation of graphene sheets is reversible and the graphene sheets are restored to their original surface area when the voltage is removed.
In an embodiment, layers of graphene films are grown on nickel films on silicon wafers using chemical vapor deposition. A polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS) stamp is adhered to the graphene film on the wafer. The graphene film with the PDMS stamp is detached from the wafer by etching off the nickel film using, e.g., a FeCl3 solution. The graphene/PDMS sample is then rinsed by, e.g., isopropanol and deionized water, dried in, e.g., air or nitrogen gas. This is followed by stamping the cleaned graphene/PDMS on a biaxially stretched elastomer film, e.g., VHB acrylic film, to transfer the graphene film to the elastomer film. Thereafter, the pre-strains in the elastomer film are relaxed sequentially along the two pre-stretch axes. The method for making the active material for enclosing the LTA gas is described in detail by Zhao, et al (“Multifunctionality and control of crumpling and unfolding of large-area graphene”, Nature Materials, 2013, pp 321-325).
A high-voltage supply with controllable ramping rate can be used apply high voltage between the top and bottom graphene electrodes (as shown in
When a high voltage is applied to graphene membranes G_in and G_out, an electric field is formed across elastomer E, thereby increasing the surface area graphene membranes G_in and G_out as seen in the left illustration in
Graphene provides certain advantages over other technologies for active surface control materials. For example, coating a substrate with graphene increases the hydrophobicity of the substrate. Additionally, the graphene has significantly higher transparency compared to other similar materials. While embodiments described herein use graphene to control the surface area of enclosure 525, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that similar structures can be made using other materials such as, for example, flexible metallic electrodes, conductive polymers, indium tin oxide (ITO), carbon nanotubes, shape memory alloys, high thermal expansion coefficient materials, piezoelectric materials, electroactive polymers, or any similar material. The methods for making an area controllable surface using these methods may vary and will be known to the skilled artisan.
A skilled artisan will recognize that enclosure 525 as described herein is structured as a capacitor and therefore, can also be used for storing electrical energy. For example, if the payload includes a panel of solar cells, the electrical energy generated by the solar cells can be stored in the capacitor formed by enclosure 525. Naturally, one of the drawbacks of this approach is that as more and more electrical energy is stored in enclosure 525, the buoyancy of the LTA device increases. Thus, the dual-purpose nature of such a structure may not be ideal for certain embodiments. However, such a structure can be suitably modified to optimize its energy storage and altitude control function.
In some embodiments, an additional similar to enclosure 525 may be included within the LTA device enclosure 510 with different structural materials. For example, the for the additional structure material for elastomer membrane E may be replaced by a non-elastomeric, non-stretchable flexible dielectric material such as polyethylene, or polypropylene in a relaxed state such that there is no volume change with a voltage is applied. Other modifications of the structure will be apparent to the skilled artisan.
In various embodiments, other components typically included in the payload may be incorporated within or as part of enclosure 510. For example, in an embodiment, one or more antennas may be formed by printing thin conducting structures on enclosure 510. Obviously, these conducting structures will be connected to other electrical components of the payload using electrical wires that may also be printed on enclosure 510.
In an embodiment, the conducting structures may be made from any suitable materials, e.g., metals such as aluminum, silver, gold and the like; doped silicon or other doped semiconductors; doped metal oxides; conducting polymers; or nanotubes and nanowires or various material such as carbon, zinc oxide, indium doped tin oxide, and the like. The various conducting material may be textured for allowing flexibility.
In other embodiments, the conducting structures may be liquid metallic alloys, e.g., eutectic gallium indium alloy or Galinstan, enclosed in elastomeric microfluidic channels. In such embodiments, microfluidic channels are formed in elastomeric polymers such as PDMS, and filled with liquid metallic alloys to form stretchable or flexible antennas and interconnects.
Naturally, as such an antenna is stretched the resonant frequency of the antenna will change. This property of stretchable antennas may or may not be useful in the context of the LTA device disclosed herein.
One of the drawbacks of such an approach is that these conducting structures may conduct unwanted charges the payload electronics when the LTA device may be passing through or near an electrically charged cloud. This can be ameliorated, for example, by modifying enclosure 510 to use a multi-layered material to construct enclosure 510. The conducting structures can then be printed on one of the interior layers. Other modifications will be apparent to one skilled in the art.
In an embodiment, enclosure 510 may be modified to be a multi-layer membrane and one of the layers may be formed as a flexible secondary electrochemical battery. For example, one of the layers may be formed as a flexible lithium ion battery using paper as separator and free-standing carbon nanotube thin films as current collectors. In such an embodiment, the current collectors and lithium ion battery material are integrated on to a single sheet of paper using a lamination process. The paper functions as both, a mechanical substrate and a separator membrane with low impedance.
The process for forming the lithium-ion paper battery is shown schematically in
A flexible battery can be formed into any desired shape. For example, the flexible battery can be formed as one of the multiple layers of enclosure 510. While, an enclosure using thin flexible lithium-ion battery is described herein, any other suitable flexible battery may be used for constructing the enclosure. For example, a Zn—MnO2 battery may be used. A skilled artisan will know the various thin flexible batteries that can be constructed as one of the layers of enclosure 510.
In yet other embodiments, one of the multiple layers of enclosure 510 may be formed as a flexible photovoltaic cell or panel. For example, in an embodiment, photovoltaic (PV) structures are coated on an ITO coated plastic substrate (e.g., polyethylene terephthalate or PET). The PV structures may include, for example, poly[2-methoxy-5-(3′,7′-dimethyloctyloxy)-1,4-phenylenevinylene] (MDMO-PPV) forming the p-type material; phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) forming the n-type material of the PV diode; ITO forming the cathode; and aluminum forming the anode material. Other suitable flexible PV structures may be used.
In an embodiment, an LTA device such as a super-pressure balloon may be formed using a multi-layer construction for its balloon membrane. The outermost layer is formed from a suitable structural material such as polyethylene (PE) or PET. A second inner layer forms a flexible photovoltaic cell. A third inner layer forms a battery for storing the energy generated by the flexible photovoltaic layer. A fourth inner layer is formed from another suitable structural material and has printed thereon, electronic components such as antennae and connecting wires. A fifth inner layer is formed as the flexible LTA gas enclosure as disclosed herein. In such an embodiment, there may or may not be air or other gases between subsequent layers and the various layers (except the LTA gas enclosure) may or may not change their respective surface areas as the pressure outside the balloon increases or decreases while the balloon moves up or down in the earth's atmosphere.
In another embodiment, the outermost layer of the LTA device enclosure 510 may be colored in two colors, a first portion being colored in a first color and a second portion being colored in a second color. The first and/or second colors may be chosen to have different heat absorption coefficients. For example, the first color could be white and the second color could be black. If the LTA device is rotated such that the portion colored in black faces the sun, the heat absorbed by the portion of enclosure 510 increases the temperature of the gas enclosed by enclosure 510, thereby increasing the buoyancy of the LTA device allowing it to ascend.
The foregoing detailed description has set forth various embodiments of the devices and/or processes by the use of diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples. Insofar as such diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples contain one or more functions and/or operations, it will be understood by those within the art that each function and/or operation within such diagrams, flowcharts, or examples can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, or virtually any combination thereof.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that it is common within the art to describe devices and/or processes in the fashion set forth herein, and thereafter use engineering practices to integrate such described devices and/or processes into data processing systems. That is, at least a portion of the devices and/or processes described herein can be integrated into a data processing system via a reasonable amount of experimentation.
The herein described subject matter sometimes illustrates different components contained within, or connected with, different other components. It is to be understood that such depicted architectures are merely exemplary, and that in fact many other architectures can be implemented which achieve the same functionality. In a conceptual sense, any arrangement of components to achieve the same functionality is effectively “associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, any two components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality can be seen as “associated with” each other such that the desired functionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermediate components.
With respect to the use of substantially any plural and/or singular terms herein, those having skill in the art can translate from the plural to the singular and/or from the singular to the plural as is appropriate to the context and/or application. The various singular/plural permutations may be expressly set forth herein for sake of clarity.
All references, including but not limited to patents, patent applications, and non-patent literature are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The various aspects and embodiments disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.
This Application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/983,119, filed Dec. 29, 2015 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,059,421, issued Aug. 28, 2018), which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/097,839, filed Dec. 30, 2014, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2151336 | Scharlau | Mar 1939 | A |
2366423 | Pear, Jr. | Jan 1945 | A |
2462102 | Istvan | Feb 1949 | A |
2542823 | Lyle | Feb 1951 | A |
2598064 | Linedenblad | May 1952 | A |
2625348 | Noxon et al. | Jan 1953 | A |
2742246 | Mellen | Apr 1956 | A |
3030500 | Katzin | Apr 1962 | A |
3030509 | Carlson | Apr 1962 | A |
3045952 | Underwood | Jul 1962 | A |
3058694 | Fazio et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
3174705 | Schiff et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3206749 | Chatelain | Sep 1965 | A |
3384891 | Anderson | May 1968 | A |
3404278 | Chope | Oct 1968 | A |
3471856 | Laugh Un, Jr. et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
3555552 | Alford | Jan 1971 | A |
3674225 | Johnson | Jul 1972 | A |
3742358 | Cesaro | Jun 1973 | A |
3781893 | Beukers et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3781894 | Ancona et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
4123987 | Singerle et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4249161 | Lee | Feb 1981 | A |
4262864 | Eshoo | Apr 1981 | A |
4394780 | Mooradian | Jul 1983 | A |
4419766 | Goeken et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4457477 | Regipa | Jul 1984 | A |
4472720 | Reesor | Sep 1984 | A |
4481514 | Beukers et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4509053 | Robin et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4509851 | Ippolito et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4589093 | Ippolito et al. | May 1986 | A |
4595928 | Wingard | Jun 1986 | A |
4689739 | Federico et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4696052 | Breeden | Sep 1987 | A |
4740783 | Lawrence et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4747160 | Bossard | May 1988 | A |
4868577 | Wingard | Sep 1989 | A |
4979170 | Gilhousen et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4995572 | Piasecki | Feb 1991 | A |
5005513 | Van Patten et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5067172 | Schloemer | Nov 1991 | A |
5119397 | Dahlin et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5121128 | Lidth de Jeude et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5123112 | Choate | Jun 1992 | A |
5175556 | Berkowitz | Dec 1992 | A |
5189734 | Bailey et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5204970 | Stengel et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5212804 | Choate | May 1993 | A |
5214789 | George | May 1993 | A |
5218366 | Cardamone et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5235633 | Dennison et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239668 | Davis | Aug 1993 | A |
5287541 | Davis | Feb 1994 | A |
5327572 | Freeberg | Jul 1994 | A |
5345448 | Keskitalo | Sep 1994 | A |
5359574 | Nadolink | Oct 1994 | A |
5384565 | Cannon | Jan 1995 | A |
5420592 | Johnson | May 1995 | A |
5430656 | Dekel et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5433726 | Horstein et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5439190 | Horstein et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444762 | Frey et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5455823 | Noreen et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467681 | Librman | Nov 1995 | A |
5471641 | Dosiere et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5488648 | Womble | Jan 1996 | A |
5519761 | Gilhousen | May 1996 | A |
5521817 | Burdoin et al. | May 1996 | A |
5533029 | Gardner | Jul 1996 | A |
5557656 | Ray et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559865 | Gilhousen | Sep 1996 | A |
5584047 | Tuck | Dec 1996 | A |
5615409 | Forssen et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5645248 | Campbell | Jul 1997 | A |
5714948 | Farmakis et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5745685 | Kirchner et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748620 | Capurka | May 1998 | A |
5759712 | Hockaday | Jun 1998 | A |
5761655 | Ben-Shachar | Jun 1998 | A |
5788167 | Castiel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781739 | Bach et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5832380 | Ray et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835059 | Nadel et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5870549 | Bobo | Feb 1999 | A |
5899975 | Nielsen | May 1999 | A |
5907949 | Falke et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5909299 | Sheldon, Jr. et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5960200 | Eager et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963128 | McClelland | Oct 1999 | A |
5978940 | Newman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987432 | Zusman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5992795 | Tockert | Nov 1999 | A |
5996001 | Quarles et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6061562 | Martin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067579 | Hardman et al. | May 2000 | A |
6097688 | Ichimura et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108673 | Brandt et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128622 | Bach et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141660 | Bach et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144899 | Babb et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6167263 | Campbell | Dec 2000 | A |
6212550 | Segur | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6243737 | Flanagan et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250309 | Krichen et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253200 | Smedley et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256676 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259447 | Kanetake et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289382 | Bowman-Amuah | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6324398 | Lanzerotti et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6397253 | Quinlan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401136 | Britton et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414947 | Legg et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6446110 | Lectiona et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6507856 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507857 | Yalcinalp | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510466 | Cox et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519617 | Wanderski et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529921 | Berkowitz et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530078 | Shmid et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535896 | Britton et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6543343 | Taylor | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560639 | Dan et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6568631 | Hillsdon | May 2003 | B1 |
6589291 | Boag et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6591272 | Williams | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601071 | Bowker et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606642 | Ambler et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613098 | Sorge et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615363 | Talluri et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628941 | Knoblach | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6643825 | Li et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665861 | Francis et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6666410 | Boelitz et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668354 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6675095 | Bird et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687873 | Ballantyne et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697489 | Carlson | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6728685 | Ahluwalia | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738975 | Yee et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6753889 | Naimi | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6772206 | Lowry et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775680 | Ehrman et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6799299 | Li et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6810429 | Walsh et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816883 | Baumeister et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826696 | Chawla et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6843448 | Parmley | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850979 | Saulpaugh et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6859834 | Arora et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6874146 | Lyengar | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6889360 | Ho et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6901403 | Bata et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6901430 | Smith | May 2005 | B1 |
6904598 | Abileah et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6907564 | Burchhardt et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6909903 | Wang | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6910216 | Abileah et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912719 | Elderon et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915523 | Dong et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6948117 | Van Eaton et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6948174 | Chiang et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952717 | Monchilovich et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6964053 | Ho et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6971096 | Ankireddipally et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6980963 | Hanzek | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6980993 | Horvitz et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7000238 | Naler et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7013306 | Turba et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7043687 | Knauss et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051032 | Chu-Carroll et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054901 | Shafer | May 2006 | B2 |
7058955 | Porkka | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069291 | Graves et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7080092 | Upton | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7093789 | Barocela et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107285 | Von Kaenel et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111011 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120645 | Manikutty et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7120702 | Huang et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124299 | Dick et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130893 | Chiang et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134075 | Hind et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143190 | Christensen et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7152205 | Day et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7181493 | English et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7266582 | Stelting et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7296229 | Berstis | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7341223 | Chu | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7398221 | Bensoussan et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7418508 | Haller et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421701 | Dinh et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7487936 | Heaven | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7567779 | Seligsohn et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7590967 | Behrendt et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7801522 | Knoblach et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8286910 | Alavi | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8342442 | Dancila | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8718477 | Devaul et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8733697 | Devaul et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8812176 | Biffle et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8820678 | Devaul et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8996024 | Teller et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9300388 | Behroozi et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9407362 | Devaul et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9424752 | Bonawitz | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9590721 | Behroozi et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9714831 | Kapoor et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
20010004583 | Uchida | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010014900 | Brauer et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010016869 | Baumeister et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010032232 | Zombek et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034791 | Clubb et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037358 | Clubb et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047311 | Singh | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020010716 | McCartney et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020031101 | Petite et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035583 | Price et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038335 | Dong et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038336 | Abileah et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042849 | Ho et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046294 | Brodsky et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049815 | Dattari | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052968 | Bonefas et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020056012 | Abileah et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059344 | Britton et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072361 | Knoblach | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078010 | Ehrman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078255 | Narayan | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083099 | Knauss et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099735 | Schroeder et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020100027 | Binding et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107915 | Ally et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111989 | Ambler et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116454 | Dyla et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133569 | Huang et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143820 | Van Eaton et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156930 | Velasquez | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020160745 | Wang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020160805 | Laitinen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161801 | Hind et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174340 | Dick et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175243 | Black et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178031 | Sorensen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178290 | Coulthard et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178299 | Teubner | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188688 | Bice et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194227 | Day et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198974 | Shafer | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004746 | Kheirolomoom et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030007397 | Kobiyashi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040273 | Seligsohn et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040955 | Anaya et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046035 | Anaya et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055768 | Anaya et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065623 | Cornell et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070006 | Nadler et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074217 | Beisiegei et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078902 | Leong et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081002 | De Vorchik et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093403 | Upton | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093436 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093468 | Gordon et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093500 | Khodabakchian et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097327 | Anaya et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109281 | Knoblach et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120730 | Kuno et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030121142 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126229 | Kantor et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030159111 | Fry | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163544 | Wookey et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163585 | Elderon et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167233 | Pledereder et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191970 | Devine et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204460 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212686 | Chu-Carroll et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006739 | Mulligan | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024820 | Ozzie et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030740 | Stelting | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040064466 | Manikutty et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103370 | Chiang et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104304 | Parmley | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111464 | Ho et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040205536 | Newman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205731 | Junkermann | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205770 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210469 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221292 | Chiang et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230987 | Snover et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237034 | Chiang et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050014499 | Knoblach | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050228 | Perham et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091639 | Patel | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050165826 | Ho et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165936 | Haller et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166209 | Merrick et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171970 | Ozzie et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203944 | Dinh et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210414 | Angiulo et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050258306 | Barocela et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278410 | Espino | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060063529 | Seligsohn et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060265478 | Chiang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070083524 | Fung et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070084283 | Fung et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080263641 | Dinh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271049 | Dinh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20060299990 | Knoblach et al. | Dec 2008 | |
20090189015 | Alavi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090294582 | Michel | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100100269 | Ekhaguere et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131121 | Gerlock | May 2010 | A1 |
20100228468 | Dangelo | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100292871 | Schultz et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110118907 | Elkins | May 2011 | A1 |
20120158280 | Ravenscroft | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120223181 | Ciampa | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130153749 | Contorer | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130175387 | DeVaul | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130175391 | DeVaul et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130177321 | DeVaul et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140158823 | Smith et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166817 | Levien et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140249693 | Stark et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140284422 | Sapir | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140367511 | Knoblach et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379173 | Knapp et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150134150 | Farjon | May 2015 | A1 |
20150160658 | Reedman et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150248711 | Fournier | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150298786 | Stigler | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160003620 | Kapoor et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160155338 | Lynar et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160167761 | Roach | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160189548 | Thurling et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160196750 | Collins | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160196757 | Knoblach | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160214716 | Knoblach et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160226573 | Behroozi | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160253908 | Chambers et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1188951 | Mar 1965 | DE |
0490722 | Jun 1992 | EP |
0837567 | Apr 1998 | EP |
1058409 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1327580 | Jul 2003 | EP |
2719719 | Apr 2014 | EP |
2216319 | Oct 1989 | GB |
2511447 | Sep 2014 | GB |
H0443194 | Feb 1992 | JP |
950826 | Feb 1997 | JP |
2001273177 | Oct 2001 | JP |
WO9504407 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO9602094 | Jan 1996 | WO |
W09851568 | Nov 1998 | WO |
W00101710 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0158098 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO0167290 | Sep 2001 | WO |
2002087112 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2006108311 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2011148373 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 1, 2006, for patent application No. 0502604035, 7 pages. |
Extensible Markup l..anguage (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition) Oct. 2000, W3C. |
Gavan, J. (1996) “Stratospheric Quasi-Stationary Platforms: (SQ-SP) Complementary to Radio Satellite Systems,” Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel, 1996, Nineteenth Convention of 283-286. |
Glushko et al., An XML Framework for Agent-Based E-Cornrnerce, ACM Mar. 1999, pp. 106-114. |
Google Search for IMS OnDemand SOA IMS MFS Web Solution [retrieved Dec. 17, 2009 at http://www.google.com/search?hi=en$source=hp&q=MFS+MID+MOD+DIF+DOF&aq . . . }. |
Hase, Y. et al. (1998) “A Novel Broadband All Wireless Access Network Using Stratospheric Platforms” VTC 1191-1194. |
Hofstetter, The Future's Future: Implications of Emerging Technology for Special Education Program Planning, Journal of Special Education Technology, Fall 200'1, vol. 16, p. 7, 7 pgs. |
Huang et al., Design and Implementation of a Web-based HL7 Message Generation and Validation System, Google 2003, pp. 49-58. |
James Martin, “Principles of Object-Oriented Analysis and Design,” Oct. 29, 1992, Chapters 1-22. |
Jantti, Jouko et al,, “Solutions for IMS Connectivity”, http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docsview.wss?uid=swg27009024&aid=1, Feb. 2006. |
Jouko Jantli et ai., “IMS Version 9 Implementation Guide”, ibm.com/redbooks, pp. 139-143. |
Long et al, “IMS Primer”, Jan. 2000, IBM, Chapter 18. |
Microfocus international “DBD, PSB and MFS Statements,” 2001, available at <http://supportiine, microfocus,com/documentation/books/mx25sp1/imdbds.htm> as of Jun. 16, 2009. |
Microsoft Corp. Computer Dictionary, Third Edition, Microsoft Press, 1997, p. 371. |
Mraz, Stephen J. (1998) “Nanosatellites Head for the Launch Pad” Machine Design 70(13):38, 42, 44, 46. |
Office Action from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,451, dated May 10, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/169,486, dated Feb. 1, 2012. |
OMG XML Metadata Interchange (XML) Specification, Jun. 2000, OMG, v1.0. |
Parr et al., Distributed Processing involving Personal Computers and Mainframe Hosts, IEEE 1985, pp. 479-489. |
PR Newswire, Sterling Commerce Announces Availability of First Data Transformation Engine to Support. Both XML and Traditional EDI Standards, ProQuest May 12, 1999, pp. 1-3. |
PR Newswire, XML.Solutions Delivers XML-based Prototype for Envera Marketplace, ProQuest, Apr. 2000, pp. 1-3. |
Royappa, Implementing Catalog Clearinghouses with XML and XSL, ACM 1998, pp. 616-623. |
Starkey, “XML-Based Templates for Generating Artifacts from Java-Based Models,” Research Disclosure, Dec. 1998; pp. 1678-1680. |
Stieren, SST: Using Single-sourcing, SGML, and Teamwork for Documentation, .ACM 1999, pp. 45-52. |
Suzuki et al., Managing the Software Design Documents with XML, ACM 1999, pp. 127-136. |
UMLTM for EAI, UMLTM Profile and Interchange Models for Enterprise Application Integration (EAI). OMG document No. ad/Sep. 17, 2001. |
Wong. Web services and Enterprise Application Integration, Google Jun. 2002, pp. 1-57. |
James L. Rand, “Long Duration Balloons”, Balloon Technology and Observations, Advance Space Research, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. (2)183-(2)190, Feb. 1994. |
R. Anderson et al., “Gains Instrumentation”, 13th AIAA Lighter-Than-Air Systems Technology Conference and AIAA International Balloon Technology Conference, Norfolk, Virginia, Jun. 28-Jul. 1, 1999, American institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, pp. 169-179. |
International Standards, Rules of the Air, Annex 2 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation Organization, Canada, Ninth Edition—Jul. 1990, pp. (i)-(ix), 1-41. |
Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, Report on Research for the Period Jul. 1967-Jun. 1970, AD72077, Dec. 1970, pp. 1-6, 353-355. |
Australian Search Report dated Oct. 30, 2018, for Australian patent application No. 2004278389, 5 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2017 in related U.S. Appl. No. 15/343,190. |
International Preliminary Examination Report dated Mar. 17, 2017 in corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/000279. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 10, 2017 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/351,441 (8 pages). |
Zang et al., “Multifunctionality and Control of the Crumpling and Unfolding of Large-Area Graphene”, Nature Materials, Jan. 20, 20'13, pp. 321-325. |
So et al, “Reversibly Deformable and Mechanically Tunable Fluidic Antennas. Adv Funct Mater”, Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 19, Nov. 2009, pp. 3632-3637. |
Hu et al., “Thin, Flexible Secondary Li-Ion Paper batteries”, ACS Nano, vol. 4, No. 10, Oct. 2010, pp. 5843-5848. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 15, 2017 in related U.S. Appl. No. 14/983,119. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2017 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/351,441. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2017 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/434,036. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 17, 2017 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/351,438. |
Brazillian Written Opinion dated Jan. 3, 2017 in corresponding Brazillian Patent Application No. PI0414906-8. |
Part 101-Moored Balloons, Kites, Umanned Rockets and Unmmaned Free Balloons, Federal Aviation Administration, Dept. of Tranportation, 14 CFR Ch. 1, Jan. 1, 1999 Edition, pp. 304-308. |
Part 101-Moored Balloons, Kites, Urnanned Rockets and Unrnmaned Free Balloons, Federal Aviation Administration, Dept. of Tranportation, 14 CFR Ch. 1, Jan. 1, 2000 Edition, pp. 309-313. |
Part 101-Moored Balloons. Kites, Umanned Rockets and Unmmaned Free Balloons. Federal Aviation Administration, Dept. of Tranportation, 14 CFR Ch. 1, Jan. 1, 2001 Edition, pp. 307-311. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and then Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority as issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/000278, dated Jul. 6, 2017. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and then Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority as issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/068081, dated Jul. 13, 2017. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2017 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/757,426. |
Canadian Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2017 in corresponding Canadian Patent Application No. 2885578. |
“Attunity Connect for mainframe, Native OS/390 Adapters to Data and Legacy,” 2003, pp. 1-3. |
“Connecting to IMS Using XML, SOAP and Web Services”, Shyh-Mei F, Ho. IMS Technical Conference, Koenigswinter, Germany, Oct. '15-17, 2002. |
“Correlate IMSADF Secondary Transaction MFS Generation with the Generation of the Output Format Rule”; IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27. No. 1B, pp. 623-624, Jun. 1984. |
“Creating WSDL and a Proxy Client From a Web Service,” www.westwind.com/webconnectionidocs/_08413NI2E.htm, 2002. |
“HostBridge and WebSphere: Integrating CICS with IBM's Application Server”, a HostBridge White Paper, Jul. 23, 2002, pp. 1-34. |
“IBM Mainframe,” www,dmreview.com/whitepaper/WID1002720,pdf. Mar. 18, 2005. |
“IMS Connect Guide and Reference version 1,” http://publibfp.bouider.ibrn.com/epubs/pdf/lcgr0001.pdf, Oct. 2000, IBM. |
“IMS Connect Guide and Reference”' IBM et al, http://publibfp.bouider.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/hwsuga11.pdf, Oct. 2002. |
“IMS Connector for Java, User's Guide and Reference”, IBM VisualAge for Java, Version 3.5, 9 pages, IBM. |
“IMS Follow-on Ideal for e-business”, Excerpts from http://www.3.ibm.com/software/data/ims/ . . . ntations/two/imsv7enh/HTML/indexp54.htm, IBM Corporation, 2002. |
“IMS Information”, Excerpts from http://www.3.ibm.com/software/data/ims/.,. ntations/two/imsv7enh/HTML/indexp55.htrn, I BM Corporation 2002. |
“Learning Management Systems XML and Web Services,” Finn Gronbaek, IBM Corporation, copyright 2001, Apr. 20, 2003, pp. 1-29. |
“Leveraging IMS Applications and Data”Excerpts from Leveraging IMS2 found at http://www.3.ibm.com/software/data/ims/...ntations/two/imsv7enh/HTML/i ndexp52. htm, IBM Corporation, 2002. |
“MFS XML Utility Version 9.3.0 User's Guide and Reference”, 57 pages, IBM Corporation, ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/data/ims/toolkit/mfswebsupport/mfsxml-v3.pdf, 2003. |
“NetDynamics, PAC for IMS” User Guide, Precise Connectivity Systems, 1998. |
“Quarterdeck Mosiac User Guide,” 1995, Chapters 1-7. |
“Remote Execution of Ims Transactions for OS/2”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 34, No. 78, pp. 16, Dec. 1991. |
“Requirements for Building Industrial Strength Web Services: The Service Broker”, http:www.theserverside.com/Warticles.tss?1=Service-Broker Jul. 2001. |
“S1215, www.IMS or Websphere Working with IMS,” Ken Blackman, 39 pp. (date unknown). |
“Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.” Mar. 2001, W3C. |
“Web Services” www.webopedia.com/TERM/W/Web services.html, 2003 |
“'Web Services—The Next Step in the Evolution of the Web”, Excerpt from http://www.3.ibm.corm/software/data/ims/ . . .ntations/two/imsv7enh/HTML/indexp51.htm, IBM Corporation, 2002. |
“Wat Web Services Are NOT”, www.webreference.com/xml/column50, 2003. |
“What's Next in IMS Providing integrated e-business Solutions: IMS Version 8,” Excerpt from http://www.3.ibm.com/software/data/ims/ . . .ntations/two/imsv7enh/HTML/indexp53.htm, IBM Corporation, 2002. |
“XML and IMS for Transparent Application integration”, Excerpt from http://www.3.ibm.com/software/data/ims/ . . .ntations/two/imssv7enh/HTML/indexp50.htm, IBM Corporation, 2002. |
“XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes” 2001, W3C <http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/PR-xmlschema-2- 20010330>. |
Application Development/Enablement, http://www.306.ibm.com/software/data/ims/presentation/five/trends2003/HTML/indexp15.htm, Oct. 11, 2003. |
Arndt et aL, An XML-Based Approach to Multimedia Software Engineering for Distance Learning. ACM, 2002, pp. 525-532. |
Blackman, “IMS eBusiness Update”, IMS V8 Roadshow, 11 pages, IBM Corporation. http://www-306ibm.com.software/data/ims/shelf/presentation/oneday/IMSeBusinessUpdate2003.pdf, 2003. |
Component of the Week: .XMI Toolkit:, Jun. 1, 2001 http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/co-cow21.html. |
Cover et al, “Web Services User Interface (WSUI) Initiative”, http://xml.coverpages.org/wsui.html, Oct. 29, 2002. |
Cover, Robin et al. Web Services for Interactive Applications (WSIA), [Web Services Component Model (WSCM)], http://xml.coverpages.org/wscm, Jan. 21, 2002, printed Oct. 31, 2007, 4 pages. |
CronJe, “Absa Uses VGR to Ensure Online Availability”. www-306.ibm.com/software/data/ims/quarterly/Winier2000/winter.htm. |
Crouch et al, “Balloon and Airship” Compton's interactive Encyclopedia, 5 pages excerpt, 1993-1994. |
David A. Brown “Balloon Technology Offers High-Altitude Applications” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Nov. 16, 1992, pp. 56-57. |
Diaz et al., inter-Organizational Document Exchange—Facing the Conversion Problem with XML, ACM 2002, pp. 1043-1044. |
Djuknic, G, M. et aL (1997) “Establishing Wireless Communications Services via High-Altitude Aeronautical Platforms: A Concept Whose Time Has Come?,” IEEE Comrnunictions Magazine 35(9): 128-135. |
Dymetman at al., XML and Multilingual Document Authoring: Convergent Trends, .A.CM Jul. 2000, pp. 243-249. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190002074 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62097839 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14983119 | Dec 2015 | US |
Child | 16114247 | US |