MULTIFUNCTIONAL COMPOSITE PROJECTILES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20240068788
  • Publication Number
    20240068788
  • Date Filed
    October 18, 2023
    6 months ago
  • Date Published
    February 29, 2024
    2 months ago
Abstract
Composite projectiles include various material compositions, diameters, and cavities within the projectiles having a variety of cavity diameters, sidewalls, and bottoms selected and formed to induce different levels of penetration and disintegration of the composite projectiles upon impact with targets.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE

A projectile, or bullet, as fired from a weapon typically includes a case or jacket that surrounds a core having a lead composition. Some of these typical projectiles have what is commonly referred to as a full metal jacket. A full metal jacket refers to a projectile that uses a soft metallic core, such as lead, surrounded by a harder jacketing material, such as gilding metal or cupronickel. The jacketing material offers a higher level of lubricity for reduced reloading failures as well as reduced friction and wear on parts of the firearm. The full metal jacket design improves firearm feeding particularly surrounding those which use mechanical manipulation for the reloading process. The benefits of improved firearm feeding are particularly important for firearms which are semi-automatic or fully automatic in reloading operation. The meta jacketing also allows for increased muzzle velocity, the speed at which a projectile exits the barrel of a firearm, without leaving significant deposits of metal in the bore. Deposits of metal within the bore can lead to unsafe or unreliable firearm operation.


The first metal jacketed bullet was introduced in 1882 and the technology used to manufacture bullets has not substantially changed since WWII. Manufacturers have been limited to assembling metals and alloys in incrementally different ways, without an impactful leap in technology to provide the ability to create and execute new and innovative designs.


The main focus point of projectile development surrounds ballistic performance of projectiles to provide longer and flatter trajectory. Other functional developments surrounding projectiles modify the intended use of the projectile by modifying the internal composition of the projectile. For example, certain projectiles use a hardened metal core for armor defeating purposes, while some projectiles use a powdered core material to limit fragments from impacting unintended targets after impacting a primary target.


The standard modem firearm loads and fires projectiles from a cartridge. A modem cartridge typically consists of a casing, which holds all the parts together to be fired as one unit. The casing, typically made of brass, holds a propellant such as gunpowder within, and has a projectile press-fit into the open top. A primer, which is used to initiate the charge of propellant, is integrated into the bottom of the casing. When the primer is struck, it initiates the propellant charge which then launches the projectile from the casing and through the firearm barrel. A rim, also at the bottom of the casing, allows for the mechanical extraction of the casing from the firearm.


A conventional Open Tip and Hollow Point copper or brass or copper and brass jacketed projectile is designed to “open up” and mushroom upon impact with a target (hard or soft) while retaining most of the projectile's mass as a monolithic projectile.


Existing technologies are unable to meet requirements necessary to perform certain tasks effectively without having tradeoffs in performance, reproducibility, safety or cost.


A need exists for projectiles that are multi-functional, and/or projectiles that can have specifically tailored performance characteristics, and/or projectiles that can be produced with specific physical or material characteristics in a cost-effective, reproducible and time expedient manner. A further need exists for a lethal projectile with minimal collateral risk, which delivers superior wound channel performance while also limiting collateral damage via “through-n-through hits” as well as target “misses.”


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

Molded projectiles disclosed herein are designed to fully disintegrate upon impact with a sufficiently hard target, but when impacting a soft target, a projectile area surrounding a projectile cavity is designed to separate into chunks and pieces, generally in an outward, radial trajectory while a base of the projectile behind the cavity retains most of its mass and moves forward and deeper into the soft target. As detailed herein, depths of penetration can be specifically engineered to meet user requirements.


The present disclosure utilizes advanced composites and additives with manufacturing techniques to produce composite projectiles for use across a broad spectrum of use cases and functionality. Certain embodiments of the present disclosure substantially utilize melt-flow processing to produce composite projectiles. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that melt-flow processing techniques may include but are not limited to extrusion, rotomolding, injection molding, and other processes involving the use of materials in a liquid or semi-liquid state. Certain embodiments comprise a composite projectile using a polyamide polymer as a binding agent in the manufacture of a composite material. Polyamides surround long-chain fiber-forming compounds with recurring amide groups. Certain polyamides, such as Nylon and Polybutylene terephthalate, are widely used due to their characteristics such as: resistance to wear or abrasion, low degradation rates at elevated temperatures, low permeability to gasses, and high chemical resistance. Certain embodiments use Nylon compositions such as Nylon 6, Nylon 66, and Nylon 12. Certain embodiments use singular polyamide composition, while others blend two or more polyamide compositions for mechanical or physical properties inherent in such blends.


Composite projectiles of the present disclosure may be machined or post-processed into useable projectiles from specified shapes or near-net-shape objects produced from melt-flow processing. The composite projectiles may also be modified prior to loading into ammunition to provide increased, altered or additional performance characteristics. Such modifications may include but are not limited to coating, plating, or addition of functional elements such as energetic or explosive particles.


In certain embodiments, the energetic or explosive particles of a composite projectile are configured to combust due to high temperature and pressure conditions. The problem with some explosive projectiles which employ combustible materials or heat-activated chemical reaction is associated with what is commonly referred to as “cook-off.” Cook-off surrounds the auto initiation of an explosive projectile. In certain scenarios, this occurs when an explosive projectile is loaded into the breach of a barrel which has been heated through the course of repeated shots fired and remains in the breach for an extended period of time.


In certain embodiments energetic particles have a net positive potential energy based on the structural make-up of the element. For instance, the use of elements commonly known as Prince Rupert drops may provide the explosive characteristics of an explosive projectile without the issues associated with explosive projectiles having combustible characteristics relying upon a chemical reaction. Prince Rupert drops are toughened glass beads created by dripping molten glass into cold water, which causes it to solidify into a tadpole-shaped droplet with a long, thin tail. These droplets are characterized internally by very high residual stresses, which give rise to counter-intuitive properties, such as the ability to withstand a blow from a hammer or a bullet on the bulbous end without breaking, while exhibiting explosive disintegration if the tail end is even slightly damaged.


Projectile manufacturers and designers have been traditionally limited to assembling metals and metal alloys in ways that are limited to specific tools and dies as well as the material. As such, a particular tool or die could be used for only one particular projectile for a specific application. Examples of such applications include close-quarter-combat operations including lethal and less-than-lethal performance characteristics, armor penetrating requirements, demolition requirements, tagging/tracking, and further applications.


It is an aspect of the present disclosure to manufacture composite projectiles, using a single tool or die, for a variety of applications. Tailoring the functional characteristics of a given projectile through material composition allows the manufacture of composite projectiles for a wide array of applications using the same manufacturing equipment, tooling and processes.


In certain use cases, projectiles designed to pierce armor traditionally include a hardened penetrator encased in a metal jacket. After the projectile is fired from a firearm, the penetrator is released from the metal jacket upon impact with the target. In order to separate and release the penetrator from the jacket, a substantial amount of kinetic energy is expended, thus limiting the maximum penetrating depth of the hardened penetrator.


Certain embodiments of the disclosure comprise a polymeric jacket for a hardened penetrator, resulting in a composite projectile having a lower mass, allowing for a higher velocity muzzle velocity. Furthermore, the polymeric jacket requires a lower level of energy to separate or disintegrate and release the hardened penetrator from the polymer jacket than as compared to a metal jacketed penetrator. Thus, the hardened penetrator of the present disclosure retains a high level of kinetic energy after release from the frangible polymeric jacket, resulting in a higher maximum penetrating depth.


In other embodiments, a composite projectile is configured for defeating armor packages, such as ceramic based armor without use of a hardened penetrator. In such embodiments, a composite projectile is configured to deform upon impact to increase the amount of kinetic energy imparted to the armor. The composite projectile deforms but does not fragment to impart the maximum amount of kinetic energy at a localized impact zone. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that defeating armor does not always require penetration of all layers of armor. Many armor packages involve a hardened plate with a soft armor backing, or standalone soft armor. Substantial back-face deformation may result in the defeat of an armor package. Such requirements for the performance and defeat criteria of armor can be found in standards such as those provided by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ). (National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center. Selection and Application Guide to Personal Body Armor [online]. NIJ Guide 100-01. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Justice, 2001 [Retrieved on 2018 Oct. 5]. Retrieved from the internet <URL: https://www.ncj rs.gov/pdffilesl/nij/189633.pdt>).


In certain embodiments the configuration of a hardened penetrator is adjusted in preparation for manufacture to achieve the desired on-target characteristics of the armor penetrator round. In certain embodiments, a flatter base is desired on a hardened penetrator. In certain embodiments, a shorter aspect ratio is preferred. Modification to aspects such as the base profile, aspect ratio and included angle of the leading end of the hardened penetrator provide modifiable elements to affect the on-target characteristics of the hardened penetrator. In certain embodiments the location of the hardened penetrator within the composite projectile can be modified in the manufacturing process to provide preferred on-target characteristics. For instance, a hardened penetrator located toward the trailing end of a composite projectile in certain embodiments is preferred for use-cases in which a soft target will be encountered prior to a hardened target. In contrast, a hardened penetrator located toward the leading end of a composite projectile in certain embodiments is preferred for use-cases in which a hardened target will be encountered prior to a soft target.


Existing metal jacketed projectiles when fired result in metal-on-metal contact with the internal surfaces of a barrel which may cause wear on the internal surfaces. This metal-on-metal contact is characterized by a high level of friction resulting in rapid increases of heat within the barrel. It is appreciated by those skilled in the art that repeated firing of a weapon in rapid succession results in the rapid increase in temperature of a barrel. The overheating of a barrel may lead to degradation of accuracy, permanent damage to the barrel or even catastrophic failure of the firearm.


Certain embodiments of the present disclosure reduce friction between a composite projectile and the interior surface of a barrel by using a polymeric jacket or thin predominantly polymeric layer for a composite projectile, particularly for the surfaces of the composite projectile that directly contact the interior surface of the barrel. A polymeric jacket provides increased lubricity over the prior art and reduces friction and heat generated within the barrel of a firearm.


In certain use cases, traditional firearm projectiles are intended for the purposes of breaching through a door or other closure to access. Such use cases involve the use of a breaching round. A breaching round, typically fired from a shotgun, is a projectile intended for firing at close ranges, e.g. 6 inches (15.2 cm) or less, at the hinges of a door or the area between the lock and doorjamb. These rounds are intended to turn into relatively harmless fragments and are intended to prevent injury to surrounding personnel, thereby limiting collateral damage such as unintended injuries and death. Although traditional breaching rounds are effective at providing access to personnel through a locked door, these rounds often cause collateral damage due to unfragmented portions of the projectile after impact. Furthermore, the use of a breaching round typically requires carrying a secondary weapon, such as a shotgun, specifically for the purpose of breaching. Carrying a secondary weapon to serve a singular purpose requires personnel to carry more weight than otherwise necessary. By eliminating the need for a secondary weapon for a singular application, such as door breaching, this allows a user to carry less weight or reallocate the available payload to other necessary supplies.


Certain embodiments of a composite projectile for use in applications, such as door breaching and/or neutralization of organic and inorganic targets, comprise a hollow-point tip.


A hollow-point tip causes more rapid deformation of a composite projectile when the composite projectile impacts a target. For breaching applications, higher velocities are typically undesired as at a certain threshold, the composite projectile punches through a breaching target such as a lock or hinge rather than breaking it. The more rapid deformation of a composite projectile used for breaching provides a larger surface area and allows the composite projectile to impart more energy across a larger surface area. The larger impact surface area allows for higher muzzle velocity and higher kinetic energy delivery to the target while breaking the target instead of punching through the target.


Certain embodiments of the disclosure comprise a breaching round version of a composite projectile which fragments into particulate upon impact to mitigate collateral damage, which is capable of being fired from a primary weapon. Thus, the primary weapon is still functional for use in close quarters combat and general-purpose use, limiting unnecessary weight carried by armed personnel.


It is a further aspect of certain embodiments for a composite projectile to impart a maximum level of kinetic energy upon the target. By imparting a maximum level of kinetic energy upon the target, any fragments resulting from the impact have low levels of kinetic energy remaining, thus limiting the ability of fragments to cause collateral damage.


Certain embodiments comprise a breaching round capable of being fired from a side-arm, such as a pistol, while maximizing the amount of energy imparted upon the target. Thus, limiting the need to carry a single-purpose large secondary weapon such as a shotgun for breaching purposes.


Some existing projectiles used for training purposes have an inner lead core and metal jacket. Such projectiles pose a risk of injury to nearby personnel due to ricochet or penetration through an unintended target. Many training facilities make use of moveable targets made of hardened metal. The movability of the target allows the absorption of ballistic energy while the hardened metal of the target provides inertial mass and resilience for the target. However, it is not uncommon for projectiles to strike these targets and ricochet, posing a potential injury risk to nearby personnel.


Certain training facilities are commonly referred to as a shoot-house. A shoot-house is a live ammunition small arms shooting range used to train military and law enforcement personnel for close contact engagements in urban combat environments. Shoot-houses are designed to mimic residential, commercial and industrial spaces. Shoot-houses are often used to acquaint personnel in infiltrating structures and the methods used to overwhelm the target(s) in the quickest and most efficient manner. Shoot-houses are modified to resemble a residential environment and with walls and floor fortified to safely absorb rounds fired from close range. Certain embodiments comprise a composite projectile having limited kinetic energy which can be used in shoot-houses.


Certain embodiments comprise a frangible composite projectile intended to turn to dust or very small particulate upon impact while providing ballistic characteristics similar to that of a standard projectile with lead core and metal jacket.


In use for target practice and training, certain existing projectiles using a lead core present an environmental and health concerns. Outdoor ranges are particularly harmful to the local biology and ground water. Best management practices have been published by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) (EPA. Best Management Practices for Lead at Outdoor Shooting Ranges. Region 2. Revised June 2005. [Retrieved on Oct. 13, 2017]. Retrieved from the Internet:<URL:https://www.epa.gov/lead/best-management-practices-lead-outdoor-shooting-ranges-epa-902-b-O1-00 1-revised-june-2005>EPA-902-B-01-001) detailing the harmful effects of lead exposure to the surrounding environment as well as to humans. Furthermore, the Center for Disease Control (“CDC”) has identified indoor shooting ranges as being a leading cause of non-occupational exposure to lead poisoning (CDC. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Apr. 25, 2014, Vol. 63, No. 16 [Retrieved on Oct. 13, 2017]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/wk/mm63 16.pdt>MMWR/Apr. 25, 2014/Vol. 63/No. 16).


Certain embodiments comprise a frangible composite projectile configured to disintegrate into small particulate upon impact while providing ballistic characteristics similar to that of a standard projectile with lead core and metal jacket. By disintegrating into small particulate, this mitigates the risk of fragments of the composite projectile from causing collateral damage.


The cost of manufacturing projectiles typically involves assembly lines in which molten metal, typically a lead alloy, is cast into shapes and sizes corresponding to certain projectile specifications and configurations. Those who have skill in the art will appreciate that the casting of lead based projectiles involves multiple steps for casting, jacketing and preparing a projectile through manufacture. Certain embodiments comprise a composite projectile which can be manufactured using efficient manufacturing processes rather than those used for the manufacture of lead based projectiles. Certain embodiments present composite projectiles which may be produced with efficient manufacturing processes such as melt-flow manufacturing, such as injection molding.


Variations of the present disclosure may be used in scenarios when armed personnel must operate in a closed structure, such as a house or apartment building. Risk is involved when armed personnel operate in closed structures where adjacency of rooms put uninvolved targets, such as other persons, into positions of consequence. Typical projectiles can penetrate through building materials, such as drywall or wood. If such projectiles do not hit their intended targets, there is risk of the projectile penetrating building materials or other inconsequential objects and striking an unintended target of consequence such as a person. Traditional projectile design and manufacturing techniques are limited when attempting to minimize penetration characteristics of a projectile, and provide limited effectiveness. Certain existing solutions describe specific metal failure points to facilitate a projectile fragmenting upon impact. These metal failure points have inconsistent results due to the unpredictable flight path of fragmented metal and associated kinetic energy with dense materials such as metals.


Certain embodiments comprise a composite projectile with frangible characteristics such that the composite projectile fragments into particulate less likely to impart collateral damage after impact with an object.


By controlling the material composition of a polymeric aspect of the composite projectile, such as microparticles or nanoparticles of metal and other microparticles or nanoparticles, such as carbon nanoparticles, the performance aspects of a composite projectile may be designed for a particular intended use. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the use of nanoparticles, particles having a dimension of 100-nanometers or less, in material composition can alter the physical properties of a base material. The effect of nanoparticles upon a base material in manufacturing is largely due to the large surface area of the material, which dominates the contributions made by the small bulk of the material. For example, 1 kg of particles having a volume of 1 mm/\3 has the same surface area as 1 mg of particles having a volume of 1 nm/\3. As a result, a small amount of nanoparticles, typically less than 10% of a base material results in large physical property changes. It will be further appreciated that certain desired effects may be imparted upon a base material using particles larger than nanoparticles. It may be desired to use microparticles to impart certain desired effects upon a base material. Micro particles are particles between 0.1-999 microns. Certain embodiments comprise a mixture having a base material, and 5% or less of the mixture comprises nanoparticles or microparticles used to impart desired physical property characteristics upon a composite projectile. In certain embodiments, only 3% or less of the mixture comprises nanoparticles or microparticles.


Certain embodiments of the present disclosure use carbon particles having a maximum dimension of 50 microns, while in other embodiments it is desired to use carbon particles having a maximum dimension of 20 microns. Carbon particles may comprise forms of spheres, platelets, tubes, fibers or other form as appreciated by those skilled in the art.


In certain embodiments, it may be desired to use clay particles in a mixture. In certain embodiments, the clay particles nanoparticles or microparticles, often referred to as nanoclay. Nanoclays are nanoparticles of layered mineral silicates. There are several classes of nanoclays, including montmorillonite, bentonite, kaolinite, hectorite, and halloysite. Organically-modified nanoclays, sometimes referred to as organoclays, are a class of hybrid organic-inorganic nanomaterials with known benefit in polymer nanocomposites, as rheological modifiers, gas absorbents and drug delivery carriers.


In certain embodiments, it may be desirable to use diamond microparticles or nanoparticles. Diamond particles at such a scale can be used to promote lubricity, polishing and reduce residue build-up within the barrel of a firearm.


In certain use cases, a composite projectile having an accurate ballistic trajectory for only a limited range is desirable. For example, for use in close quarters combat or for purposes of short-range training ammunition (SRTA). Certain embodiments for use as a limited range projectile employ the use of drag-inducing elements intended to cause a more rapid deceleration of a composite projectile in contrast with typical efforts to increase longevity of velocity and trajectory of a composite projectile. Furthermore, the use of drag-inducing features serve to destabilize the composite projectile. A drag-inducing element in certain embodiments causes the deceleration of a composite projectile to lower velocities at which turbulent effects from the drag-inducing elements causes asymmetrical drag. The asymmetrical drag causes the composite projectile to wobble or tumble through the air rather than maintain an orientation in which a longitudinal axis is parallel or tangential to the trajectory of the composite projectile.


The drag-inducing elements of certain embodiments of the present disclosure are intended to disrupt the aerodynamic stability of the projectile within a certain range or after passing through a certain medium. The benefits of disrupting the aerodynamic stability of a projectile include decreasing the chances of collateral damage if a projectile misses or passes completely though a target. By disrupting the aerodynamics of a projectile, the effective range within which it is lethal or can cause collateral damage is considerably decreased.


Certain embodiments of the present disclosure comprise a projectile having drag-inducing elements with a trailing aspect of the drag-inducing elements which are intended to create drag and disrupt the aerodynamic stability of the projectile. In such embodiments these trailing aspects of the drag-inducing elements are characterized by surfaces orthogonal to the path of travel of the projectile or other such characteristics.


In certain embodiments a composite projectile comprises a rebated base. A rebated base in certain use-cases enhances the molding manufacturing process and enhances ballistic trajectory and accuracy in use.


In certain embodiments a composite projectile comprises an ogive on the external profile of the composite projectile. An ogive, such as a tangent or secant ogive, can be utilized for the purposes of augmenting the aerodynamics of a composite projectile or increasing interaction of a composite projectile with the internal surfaces of a barrel for alignment and firing purposes.


Standard projectiles having a hardened penetrator within the body of the projectile typically comprise an outer jacket of copper or cupronickel and a hardened penetrator potted within the outer jacket with a potting metal such as lead or similar metal having a relatively low melting point. In certain use cases, the heat from the initiation of the charge softens the potting metal and allows the hardened penetrator to shift prior to or during flight. The shifting of a hardened penetrator within a projectile can cause the projectile to become unbalanced and cause unfavorable ballistic trajectory or characteristics.


It is an aspect of certain embodiments of the present disclosure to prevent the shifting of a hardened penetrator within the projectile such as caused by the heat from initiation of a propelling charge. In certain embodiments, a cap is affixed to the trailing end of a composite projectile to shield the base of the composite projectile from the heat of the initiation of the propelling charge.


In certain embodiments a composite projectile fragments in a predictable and repeatable manner to control penetration on-target, post-target, or in the event the composite projectile does not strike an intended target. Certain embodiments of a composite projectile comprise a tapered element at the leading portion of a composite projectile. A tapered element, such as a cone, is oriented such that the tapered element tapers from the leading portion of the composite projectile toward the trailing end of the composite projectile. As such, the impact of the trailing end of the composite projectile results in an initiation of expansion of the composite projectile upon impact with any target. The initiation of expansion causes an expanding effect which results in lower velocity and rapid dispersion of kinetic energy.


Existing challenges with the manufacture of armor penetrating ammunition include the alignment of the hardened penetrator within a projectile. The alignment of the hardened penetrator with the axial center of mass of the projectile is critical to the balance and ballistic performance of the projectile. It is an aspect of certain embodiments to provide the ability to consistently and repeatably orient a hardened penetrator within a composite projectile to align the axial center of mass of the hardened penetrator with that of the composite projectile. Certain embodiments comprise an alignment element comprising material substantially similar to the material which aligns the hardened penetrator for the molding process through which the alignment element becomes integral to the composite projectile through the molding process of a composite projectile. In certain embodiments the alignment element comprises a metallic structure such as an open-cell metallic structure configured to allow molten polymer to permeate throughout the alignment element. Thus, the alignment element becomes integrated into the composite projectile.


Certain embodiments can utilize a penetrator comprising a malleable material such as copper or cupronickel.


In the existing prior art, a hardened penetrator is inserted into a metal jacket prior to being potted in with a lower melting point metal such as lead. As such, the form of existing hardened penetrators is limited to an axial profile having a consistent form as external features may result in inconsistent potting of the hardened penetrator and potential for voids or air-gaps within the construction of the projectile, which would leave the projectile unbalanced.


The present disclosure allows for the use of hardened penetrators having external profiles having external features.


These and other advantages will be apparent from the disclosure. The above-described embodiments, objectives, and configurations are neither complete nor exhaustive. As will be appreciated, other embodiments are possible using, alone or in combination, one or more of the features set forth above or described in detail below. Further, this Summary is neither intended nor should it be construed as being representative of the full extent and scope of the present disclosure, which is set forth in various levels of detail in this section, as well as in the attached drawings and the detailed description below. No limitation as to the scope of the present disclosure is intended to either the inclusion or non-inclusion of elements, components, etc. in this Summary. Additional aspects of the present disclosure will become more readily apparent from the detailed description, particularly when taken together with the drawings, and the claims provided herein.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 2 is a side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 3 is a side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 4 is a side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 5—A side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 6 is a side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 7 is a side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 9A is a perspective view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 9B is a side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 9C is a front view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 10 is a side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 11A is a side view of a composite projectiles of certain embodiments comprising a cap at a trailing end;



FIG. 11B is a cross-sectional view of a composite projectiles of certain embodiments comprising a cap at a trailing end;



FIG. 11C is a side view of a composite projectiles of certain embodiments comprising a cap at a trailing end;



FIG. 11D is a cross-sectional view of a composite projectiles of certain embodiments comprising a cap at a trailing end;



FIG. 11E is a side view of a composite projectiles of certain embodiments comprising a cap at a trailing end;



FIG. 11F is a cross-sectional view of a composite projectiles of certain embodiments comprising a cap at a trailing end;



FIG. 11G is a side view of a composite projectiles of certain embodiments comprising a cap at a trailing end;



FIG. 11H is a cross-sectional view of a composite projectiles of certain embodiments comprising a cap at a trailing end;



FIG. 12A is a side view of a composite penetrator of certain embodiments;



FIG. 12B is a side view of a composite penetrator of certain embodiments;



FIG. 12C is a side view of a composite penetrator of certain embodiments;



FIG. 12D is a side view of a composite penetrator of certain embodiments;



FIG. 12E is a side view of a composite penetrator of certain embodiments;



FIG. 13A is a side view of a composite penetrator of certain embodiments;



FIG. 13B is a side view of a composite penetrator of certain embodiments;



FIG. 13C is a side view of a composite penetrator of certain embodiments;



FIG. 13D is a side view of a composite penetrator of certain embodiments;



FIG. 13E is a side view of a composite penetrator of certain embodiments;



FIG. 13F is a side view of a composite penetrator of certain embodiments;



FIG. 13G is a side view of a composite penetrator of certain embodiments;



FIG. 14A is a front view of an alignment element of certain embodiments;



FIG. 14B is a perspective view of an alignment element of certain embodiments;



FIG. 15 is a cross-sectional view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 16A is a perspective view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 16B is a cross-sectional view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 17A is a perspective view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 17B is a side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 17C is a front view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 18A is a cross-sectional side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 18B is a cross-sectional side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 18C is a cross-sectional side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 18D is a cross-sectional side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 18E is a cross-sectional side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 18F is a cross-sectional side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 19 is a cross-sectional side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 20 is a cross-sectional side view of a composite projectile of certain embodiments;



FIG. 21 is a side view of results of a certain composite projectile being fired into a transparent gel block;



FIG. 22 is a side view of results of a certain composite projectile being fired into a transparent gel block;



FIG. 23 is a side view of results of a certain composite projectile being fired into a transparent gel block;



FIG. 24 is a side view of results of a certain composite projectile being fired into a transparent gel block;



FIG. 25 is a side view of results of a certain composite projectile being fired into a transparent gel block;



FIG. 26 is a side view of results of a certain composite projectile being fired into a transparent gel block;



FIG. 27 is a side view of results of a certain composite projectile being fired into a transparent gel block; and



FIG. 28 is a side view of results of a certain composite projectile being fired into a transparent gel block.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Certain embodiments of the present disclosure comprise a composite projectile for use in applications such as door breaching and/or neutralization of organic and inorganic targets. Such embodiments comprise less than 10% polyamide, 85-95% dense metal particles, such as tungsten, and up to 5% carbon particles having a maximum dimension of 50 microns. In certain embodiments, the carbon particles have a maximum dimension of 20 microns. Percentages herein for the mixture of embodiments are provided by mass or weight. In certain embodiments, the dense metal particles have a maximum dimension of 250 microns, while in other embodiments it may be desired to use dense metal particles having a maximum dimension of 150 microns. When these particles are homogeneously mixed and formed through a melt-flow process, the characteristics imparted upon the resulting composite projectile provide rapid dissipation of energy when the composite projectile impacts a target. Such embodiments are designed to provide shrapnel-free and ricochet-free characteristics. It is a further aspect of such embodiments to prevent the destructive energy or particles from the composite projectile from traveling beyond the intended target area. The dense metal particles are typically of a metallic element or compound to provide a specified weight for a given caliber. Examples of a composite projectile 1000 for use in door breaching and/or neutralization of organic and inorganic targets are shown in FIG. 1-FIG. 3.


Certain embodiments comprise a flat face 1010 at a leading end 1001 of the composite projectile to form what is commonly referred to as a “wadcutter” or “semi-wadcutter” tip, and a taper 1020 at a trailing end 1002 of the composite projectile to form what is commonly referred to as a “boat-tail.” Certain embodiments comprise radial recesses 1030 at a medial portion of the composite projectile to form what are commonly referred to as “driving bands.” Flat faces 1010 are commonly associated with projectiles having a lower muzzle velocity and are used to provide increased projectile expansion and deformation upon impact. A taper 1020 at a trailing end 1002 of a composite projectile serves to provide additional accuracy by reducing drag and making the composite projectile less susceptible to cross winds. Radial recesses 1030 are used to engage with the rifling of a barrel while limiting the drag on the composite projectile and wear on the barrel. The result is a faster muzzle velocity and less friction and degradation of the interior of the barrel. It may be desired for certain embodiments to comprise a composite projectile with lower levels of kinetic energy delivered to the target than embodiments comprising dense metal particles. Certain embodiments comprise iron or steel metal particles. Such embodiments deliver lower levels of kinetic energy for training purposes such as within a shoot-house.


Exemplary percentages provided herein surround measurement of composition by weight, however, such percentages can be applied in volumetric measurement while in keeping with the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.


Certain embodiments comprise a composite projectile for use in shrapnel-free and ricochet-free shooting practice as well as for the neutralization of organic and inorganic targets. Such embodiments comprise less than 10% of a polyamide, 85-95% of inexpensive metal particles such as aluminum, steel, or iron, and up to 5% carbon particles having a maximum dimension of 50 microns. In certain embodiments, carbon particles have a maximum dimension of 20 microns. In other embodiments, carbon particles are not utilized. In certain embodiments, the metallic particles comprise a maximum dimension of 150 microns, while other embodiments comprise metallic particles having a maximum dimension of 250 microns. Homogeneous mixing and forming through a melt-flow process results in an inexpensive composite projectile which will not carry destructive outside the target area after striking a desired target. An example of a composite projectile 1000 for use in shrapnel-free and ricochet-free shooting practice as well as for the neutralization of organic and inorganic targets is shown in FIG. 4. Certain embodiments comprise a convex conical form 1050 with a flat face 1010.


Certain embodiments comprise a composite projectile which exhibits explosive characteristics upon impact with a target. Such embodiments comprise less than 10% of a polyamide or other polymer capable of being processed in a melt-flow or casting process. The composite projectile further comprises 25-90% of weight inducing particles such as metallic particles, 5-65% of energetic or explosive particles such as aluminum nanoparticles, and up to 5% of carbon particles having a maximum dimension of 50 microns. In certain embodiments, the carbon particles have a maximum dimension of 20 microns. In certain embodiments, the weight inducing particles have a maximum dimension of 250 microns, while other embodiments comprise metallic particles with maximum dimension of 150 microns. The homogeneous mixing and forming through a melt-flow process results in a composite projectile which will react explosively when it impacts a target. An example of a composite projectile 1000, shown in FIG. 5, exhibits explosive characteristics upon impact comprises a flat face 1010. The flat face 1010, as shown provides a more substantial area in relation to the composite projectile 1000, thus resulting in a higher than normal pressure event when the composite projectile 1000 strikes a given target. The higher than normal pressure event provides necessary pressure levels to initiate the explosive reaction of the composite projectile 1000.


Certain embodiments of the present disclosure comprise a composite projectile having uniquely identifiable characteristics to allow the composite projectile to be identified prior to and after the composite projectile has been fired from a weapon. Such embodiments comprise less than 10% of a polyamide or other polymer capable of being processed in a melt-flow or casting process and 85-95% of metal particles such as copper. In certain embodiments, the metal particles comprise a maximum dimension of 250 microns while other embodiments comprise a maximum dimension of 150 microns. The composite projectile further comprises up to 5% carbon particles having a maximum dimension of 50 microns or less, and less than 3% of unique identifying elements or molecules. In certain embodiments, the carbon particles have a maximum dimension of 20 microns. Homogeneous mixing and forming through a melt-flow process results in a composite projectile which is uniquely identifiable prior to and after use. Synthetic molecules specifically made for the identification of composite projectiles may be used in the manufacture of such embodiments for increased identifiability. An example of a composite projectile 1000, shown in FIG. 6, having uniquely identifiable characteristics may be configured to be fired from any standard firearm. Certain embodiments, as shown, comprise a standard bulleted-nose 1040.


Certain embodiments of the present disclosure comprise a composite projectile having less than 10% polyamide, 85-95% of metal particles, such as copper, and up to 5% carbon particles. In certain embodiments, the metal particles have a maximum dimension of 250 microns, while other embodiments comprise metal particles having a maximum dimension of 150 microns. In certain embodiments, the maximum dimension of the carbon particles comprises a maximum dimension of 20 microns, while other embodiments comprise a maximum dimension of 50 microns. Composite projectiles may be designed to have a certain mass or density which may be tailored to a specific purpose through the variation of percentages. It will be further appreciated that composite projectiles of varying densities or masses may be produced using the same mold while varying the material composition of the composite projectile material mixture. An example of such an embodiment, as shown in FIG. 7, comprises a bulleted nose shape 1050 and a flat face 1010. Such embodiments of varying densities can be configured to be fired from any standard firearm while remaining in spirit and scope of the present disclosure.


Composite projectiles according to the disclosure may undergo post-processing or secondary manufacturing processes to modify the composite projectile. It may be desired in certain embodiments to add coatings, apertures, and/or plugs to a composite projectile for purposes of modifying ballistic trajectory, reloading action or on-target characteristics.


Certain embodiments of the present disclosure surround ammunition casing for the firing of composite projectiles. Certain embodiments comprise a polymer-based casing.


Certain embodiments comprise a steel casing. Certain embodiments comprise a casing having a combination of metal and polymer construction. Certain embodiments comprise a single-piece casing while others comprise multiple pieces assembled into a contiguous case. Such embodiments as disclosed are used to provide weight-reduction, increased reloadability, cost reductions, and or the ability to withstand higher pressures when a composite projectile is fired.


Some embodiments, such as composite projectiles and polymer-based casings, have composite projectiles and casings with a higher level of lubricity than found in the prior art. The increased lubricity of such embodiments allows for the mechanically driven reloading of a firearm with an unfired cartridge with less friction or resistance. Thus, resulting in increased reloadability with increased reliability, decreased frequency of mechanical failure events, and reduced wear on the reloading mechanisms of the firearm. An example of a composite projectile having increased lubricity is shown in FIG. 8, wherein a composite projectile 1000 further comprises an outer surface 1060 having a polymeric coating.


Certain embodiments comprise a composite projectile having a colorant added and homogeneously incorporated prior to the production of the composite projectile. This results in a composite projectile having a particular color or tint which is identifiable by the user of the composite projectile. It may be desired to color-code composite projectiles according to their intended purpose, allowing a user to identify composite projectiles for particular purposes by color, without a need for a secondary or post-processing step of coating or coloring.


Certain embodiments, as shown in FIG. 9AFIG. 9C, comprise a composite projectile having a drag-inducing element 1100. In certain embodiments, a drag-inducing element 1100 comprises a side-cut into the external surface 1110 of a composite projectile. In certain embodiments a drag-inducing element 1100 further comprises a plurality of fillets or chamfers into the external surface 1110 of a composite projectile. Although it is typically preferred that such drag-inducing elements 1100 are symmetrically configured around the external surface 1110 of the composite projectile, in certain use-cases drag-inducing elements 1100 may be asymmetrically spaced around the external surface 1110 of the composite projectile are in keeping with the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. It will be further appreciated that the number of drag-inducing elements 1100 is not limited to a total of six as shown in FIG. 9A-FIG. 9C.


Referring again to FIG. 9AFIG. 9C and FIG. 17AFIG. 17C, in certain embodiments the drag-inducing element 1100 of a projectile comprises a cylindrical cut 2000 in a forward aspect 2010, or the ogive of the projectile. Such drag-inducing elements 1100 can be oriented parallel to the path of travel 2100 of the projectile, as demonstrated in FIG. 17A while it is in keeping with the spirit and scope of the present disclosure for such cylindrical cuts to be askew from parallel from the path of travel 2100 of the projectile.


With continued reference to FIG. 9AFIG. 9C and FIG. 17AFIG. 17C, certain embodiments of the present disclosure comprise a drag-inducing element 1100 having a trailing aspect 2200 which is substantially orthogonal to the path of travel 2100 of the projectile. As used herein regarding the trailing aspect 2200 of a drag-inducing element, “substantially orthogonal” comprises a surface which is orthogonal to the path of travel 2100, a surface within IS-degrees of orthogonal to the path of travel 2100, or concave surface oriented toward the path of travel 2100 of the projectile. Here, a concave surface directed toward the path of travel 2100 comprises a surface 2210 of the trailing aspect of the drag-inducing element which extends toward the trailing end 1002 of the projectile further than the outer boundary 2220 of the trailing aspect of the drag-inducing element. The trailing aspects 2200 of a drag-inducing element are intended to induce turbulent flow, which disrupt the aerodynamics of a projectile in flight whereby the projectile tumbles and results in a rapid decrease in the effectiveness of projectile as it travels beyond the intended range of use.


Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the frontal area 2400 of a projectile is defined by the area of the projectile which is projected along the velocity vector or path of travel 2100. In certain embodiments of the present disclosure, the surface 2210 of trailing aspect 2200 of the drag-inducing elements comprise between 10%-80% of the frontal area 2400 of the projectile. In certain embodiments of the present disclosure, the surface 2210 of trailing aspect 2200 of the drag-inducing elements comprise between 12%-67% of the frontal area 2400 of the projectile. In certain embodiments of the present disclosure, the surface 2210 of trailing aspect 2200 of the drag-inducing elements comprise between 15%-60% of the frontal area 2400 of the projectile.


Certain embodiments, as shown in FIG. 10, comprise a composite projectile having what is commonly referred to as a “rebated” base. A rebated base 1130 of a composite projectile, is commonly associated with a tapered base 1020 such as a boat-tail. A boat-tail surrounds the tapered base 1020 at the trailing end 1002 of a composite projectile. In certain embodiments a rebated base 1130 provides a 90-degree shoulder in conjunction with the boat-tail at the trailing end 1002 of the composite projectile.


Certain embodiments, as seen in FIG. 11AFIG. 11H, comprise a cap 1140 configured to shield the trailing end 1002 of a composite projectile from the heat and pressure associated with a propelling charge. A cap 1140 of certain embodiments comprises a copper or cupronickel material, however, other materials known to those in the art may be used within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. In certain embodiments, as seen in FIG. 11AFIG. 11B, a cap 1140 comprises a form which covers the trailing end 1002 of the composite projectile. In certain embodiments, as shown in FIG. 11CFIG. 11D, a cap 1140 comprises a form which covers the trailing end 1002 of a composite projectile, and further comprises an alignment element 1150. The alignment element 1150 of certain embodiments, as shown in FIG. 11CFIG. 11D is characterized by a central recess which is configured to receive the trailing end 1320 of a hardened penetrator. An alignment element in such embodiments serves to align a hardened penetrator 1145 with the cap 1140 and thereby the composite projectile 1000 in preparation for the molding process. In certain embodiments, as shown in FIG. 11E-FIG. 11F, comprises a cap 1140 which covers the trailing end 1002 of the composite projectile 1000, and further comprises fingers 1160 which extend toward the leading end 1001 of the composite projectile. The fingers 1160 of such embodiments serve to provide increased attachment of the cap 1160 to the composite projectile as well as to engage with the rifling of the barrel of a firearm. In certain embodiments, as shown in FIG. 11G-FIG. 11H, it may be desired for the cap 1140 to further comprise a collar 1170 which extends toward the leading end 1001 of a composite projectile. The collar 1170 of such embodiments serves to provide increased attachment of the cap 1140 to the composite projectile 1145 as well as to engage with the rifling of the barrel of a firearm. A cap as disclosed herein surrounds the shielding of the leading end of a composite projectile. However, a cap of certain embodiments may be disposed at the leading end of a composite projectile and configured to shield the leading end of the composite projectile while in keeping with the spirit and the scope of the present disclosure.


Certain embodiments of the present disclosure prevent the shifting of a hardened penetrator within projectile such as caused by the heat from initiation of a propelling charge. In certain embodiments, a cap is affixed to the trailing end 1002 of a composite projectile to shield the base of the composite projectile from the heat of the initiation of the propelling charge.


In certain embodiments, as shown in FIG. 12AFIG. 12E, a hardened penetrator 1145 of the present disclosure can comprise a number of profiles. In certain embodiments, as shown in FIG. 12A, a hardened penetrator comprises a 60-degree-included angle 1300 and a consistent profile. In certain embodiments, as shown in FIG. 12B, a hardened penetrator 1145 comprises a profile which tapers down from the leading end 1310 toward the trailing end 1320 of the hardened penetrator. In certain embodiments, as shown in FIG. 12C, a hardened penetrator 1145 comprises a 30-degree included angle 1300 which serves to provide more piercing ability for the hardened penetrator 1145. As seen in FIG. 12D, certain embodiments comprise a hardened penetrator having a frustum 1330 at the leading end 1001. The flat portion of the frustum provides more blunt force impact by the hardened penetrator against a hard target for purposes of fracturing the target versus piercing the target. In certain embodiments, as shown in FIG. 12E, a hardened penetrator 1145 comprises a conical tip 1340 with a rebated body 1350, thus once the leading end 1001 of the hardened penetrator traverses through the target, the rebated body 1350 of the hardened penetrator 1145 follows without impedance.


As seen in FIG. 13AFIG. 13G, certain embodiments comprise hardened penetrators 1145 having external features. As seen in FIG. 13A, a hardened penetrator 1145 of certain embodiments comprises an annular recess 1400 substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 1410 of the hardened penetrator. Certain embodiments comprise a plurality of annular recesses 1400. In certain use cases, such annular recesses 1400 serve to reduce friction when passing through soft armor and allowing a composite projectile to traverse further within soft armor due to increased surface area for binding with the polymer of a composite projectile. As seen in FIG. 13B, certain embodiments comprise longitudinal channels 1420 along the length of a hardened penetrator 1145 for reduced surface area for interaction with a target as well as increased surface area for binding with a polymer of a composite projectile. In certain embodiments, as shown in FIG. 13CFIG. 13D, a hardened penetrator 1145 comprises longitudinal fins 1430. In certain embodiments, as seen in FIG. 13E, a hardened penetrator 1145 comprises a boat-tail 1440 at the trailing end 1402 of the hardened penetrator. In certain embodiments, as seen in FIG. 13FFIG. 13G., a hardened penetrator 1145 comprises a helical element 1450, such as a helical groove 1451 or helical protuberance 1452, on the external surface 1460 of the hardened penetrator. In certain use cases, such helical elements 1450 induce axial spinning and allow the hardened penetrator 1145 to pass more easily through a soft armor such as those using aramid fiber based textiles.


In certain embodiments, as shown in FIG. 14AFIG. 14B, an alignment element 1500 provides alignment for a hardened penetrator 1145 within a composite projectile. In certain embodiments the alignment element 1500 comprises a recess 1510 configured to receive the hardened penetrator 1145, and offset elements 1520 configured to maintain a consistent radial offset 1530 from external aspects of a resulting projectile. In certain embodiments, the alignment element 1500 comprises a material makeup substantially consistent with the polymeric make-up of the composite projectile. As such, when the composite projectile is molded, the alignment element becomes integrated with the composite projectile. In certain embodiments, the alignment element 1500 comprises a metallic composition. In certain embodiments the alignment element 1500 comprises an open-celled matrix or foam structure

    • such as a polymer, metal, or ceramic—configured to allow the permeation of a molten polymer into and around the structure of the alignment element 1500.


In certain embodiments, shown in FIG. 15, a composite projectile 1000 is configured for fragmentation such that an expansion inducing element 1600 at the leading end 1001 of the composite projectile creates outward fragmentation upon impact with a target. In certain embodiments, the expansion inducing element 1600 comprises a conical form having a base 1610 at the leading end 1001 of the composite projectile and tapers inward toward the trailing end 1002 of the composite projectile. Some embodiments may include a double-conical form (not shown) wherein a first conical element has a base affixed to a base of a second conical element. Thus, resulting in a tip of the first conical element at the leading end 1001 of the composite projectile, and the tip of the second conical element offset toward the trailing end 1002 of the composite projectile.


In certain embodiments, shown in FIG. 16, an expansion inducing element 1650 comprises a segmented element characterized by solid aspects 1660 and perforations 1670. Such an expansion inducing element serves to control the fragmentation patterning and expansion of the composite projectile 1000 upon impact.


Turning to FIGS. 18A-20, exemplary molded, frangible, open-tip or hollow point projectiles 2000 are shown with a variety of cavity shapes and sizes. These projectiles 2000 may have formulations that utilize metal fillers and polymers and may or may not contain carbon particles. As explained in detail below, sidewalls of the projectile 2000 cavities may be straight (cylindrical) or angled (conical), but preferably an angle will not be a reverse angle (smaller at the opening of a cavity than at a base of the cavity, i.e., the opening and the sidewalls will at least be concentric or tubular in shape). Leading edges of the cavities may be larger or smaller relative to a major (largest) diameter of the projectiles 2000, and depths of the cavities may be shallow or deep relative to the overall length of the projectiles.


The bases of the cavities may have a variety of geometries to promote certain events upon impact. For example, a geometry at a base can promote a “shearing” action above the mass-retained base or the geometry may be used to create a forward-ejection (similar to a shape charge at the bottom of the cavity).


The cavity dimensions of the following projectiles 2000 will promote deeper or shallower penetration into a soft target, depending on user requirements. For instance, a larger diameter cavity will not penetrate as deeply as a smaller diameter cavity. A “hydraulic action” of the soft target material entering the cavity promotes pressure extending outward thus breaking the projectile apart. Thus, depth-of-penetration may be dictated by a combination of forward speed of a particular projectile 2000, a size of its cavity, and a configuration of the cavity.


More particularly, in the following configurations, the projectiles 2000 may include molded materials designed to disintegrate upon impact with a hard object. Various blends of molding materials may be used to generate variations of disintegration and mass retention upon impact. The density of a particular molding material can be adjusted to meet weight and center-of-gravity requirements to create, for instance, a maximum “wound channel” by the disintegrating projectile 2000. But while the projectiles 2000 can be used to deliver lethality as a “duty round,” they can be safely used as training rounds with no fragment splash-back or ricochet.


As detailed below, numerous cavity configurations may be used in the projectiles 2000 to generate variations of disintegration and mass retention upon impact with various targets (e.g., soft such as flesh or paper, or hard/hardened such as armor or steel-reinforced concrete). Weight and center-of-gravity can be adjusted by a combination of material properties and cavity size and shape and configurations. For instance, conical shapes at a bottom of a base of a projectile 2000 will promote a shape charge.


Cavity design parameters in the following exemplary projectiles 2000 may include:

    • a. Sidewall angles: zero-degrees (straight-wall) to 89-degrees (shallow), where zero-degrees promotes less expansion and greater than 1-degree promotes increasingly faster rate of expansion. Thus, the angle of the cavity sidewall contributes to pressure within the cavity to dictate a rate of expansion.
    • b. Projectile Diameter to Cavity Diameter Ratios: higher ratios of >2.5:1 generally promote deeper penetration while lower ratios <2.5:1 generally promote shallower penetration.
    • c. Cavity Depth to Cavity Diameter or Aspect Ratios: High-Aspect Ratios of approximately 6.5:1 to 3.5:1; Medium-Aspect Ratios of approximately 3.4:1 to 2:1; and Low-Aspect Ratios of approximately 1.9:1 to 0.1:1.
    • d. Cavity-Base Geometries: depth of cavity determines mass retained in a base when impacting a soft target. A forward-facing “U” or “V” shape promotes a forward ejection of hot gas/plasma/ejecta while an inverted “V” or “U” promotes quicker shear from the mass-retained base. Thus, the shape of the cavity bottom dictates levels or degrees of disintegration of the composite projectile.


In FIG. 18A a projectile 2000 according to the foregoing is shown with a high-aspect-ratio (depth:diameter ratio as defined above), pressure-inducing element or cavity 2010 having low-angle sidewalls 2012 and a flat bottom 2014. The exemplary projectile 2000 includes a leading end 2001 near a cavity opening 2010 and a trailing end 2002 near a base 2016, the majority of which is retained upon target impact.


The exemplary projectile 2000 in FIG. 18B is also shown with its leading end 2001, its trailing end 2002, the high-aspect-ratio cavity 2010 but includes an inverted-V bottom 2018 to promote quicker shear from the mass-retained base 2016.



FIG. 18C shows yet another exemplary projectile 2000 with a high-aspect-ratio cavity 2010. In this example, however, a deep-V bottom 2020 is utilized to promote a forward ejection of gas and ejecta while much of the base 2016 is retained upon target impact.



FIG. 18D shows a projectile 2000 with a high-aspect-ratio cavity 2010 and a rounded bottom 2022 located forward of the base 2016.



FIG. 18E shows a projectile 2000 with a high-aspect-ratio cavity 2010 and a shallow-V bottom 2024 located forward of the base 2016.



FIG. 18F shows a projectile 2000 with a high-aspect-ratio cavity 2010 and a flat bottom 2014 located forward of the base 2016. Similar to FIG. 18A, this exemplary projectile 2000 also includes low-angle sidewalls 2012, but these include a stepped portion 2026.


With reference now to FIG. 19, a projectile 2000 is shown with a medium-aspect-ratio cavity 2010, a flat bottom 2014 located forward of its base 2016, and medium-angle sidewalls 2028.



FIG. 20 shows a projectile 2000 with a low-aspect-ratio cavity 2010, a flat bottom 2014 located forward of its base 2016, and high-angle sidewalls 2030.


Turning now to FIGS. 21-28, test results are shown in which various projectiles 2000 as described above produce different wound channels and fragmentation patterns 3000 upon penetration of ballistic gel blocks 1 at entry holes or points 3.



FIGS. 21 and 22 show entry holes 3 from a right side of the gel block 1 in which a front cavity section of a projectile 2000, such as those described above, opens up and breaks apart in a primary wound channel 3000 with a retained mass of the base 2016 penetrating deeper to a left side of the gel block 1.



FIG. 23 shows an entry hole 3 from a right side of the gel block 1 in which a front cavity section of a projectile 2000, such as those described above, opens up and breaks apart in a primary wound channel 3000 with much of the base 2016 fragmenting but penetrating deeper to a left side of the gel block 1.



FIG. 24 shows an entry hole 3 from a right side of the gel block 1 in which a front cavity section of a projectile 2000, such as those described above, opens up and breaks apart in a primary wound channel 3000 with much of the base 2016 fragmenting but penetrating deeper to a left side of the gel block 1.



FIG. 25 shows an entry hole 3 from a right side of the gel block 1 in which a front cavity section of a projectile 2000, such as those described above, opens up and breaks apart in a primary wound channel 3000 with much of the base 2016 fragmenting but penetrating deeper to a left side of the gel block 1.



FIGS. 26, 27, and 28 show a projectile 2000, such as those described above, impacting and forming an entry hole 3 from a left side of the gel block 1 in which a front cavity section of a projectile 2000, such as those described above, opens up and breaks apart in a primary wound channel 3000 with nearly complete fragmentation but achieving deep penetration to a right side of the gel block 1.


While various embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in detail, it is apparent that modifications and alterations of those embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. However, it is to be expressly understood that such modifications and alterations are within the scope and spirit of the present disclosure. Further, the inventions described herein are capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. In addition, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purposes of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “adding” and variations thereof herein are meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof, as well as, additional items.

Claims
  • 1. A molded frangible composite projectile, comprising: a leading end;a trailing end;a projectile diameter; anda pressure-inducing cavity formed within the composite projectile, the pressure-inducing cavity defining a cavity depth, a cavity diameter, a cavity sidewall, and a cavity bottom and being configured to induce disintegration of the composite projectile upon impact with a target, the projectile diameter and the cavity diameter defining a ratio dictating a depth of penetration of the target.
  • 2. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 1, wherein the composite projectile has kinetic energy upon discharge from a weapon, the leading end and the cavity being configured to use a majority of the kinetic energy to form a wound cavity in the target and to cause the trailing end to form a retained mass configured to deliver remaining kinetic energy into the wound cavity.
  • 3. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 1, wherein the composite projectile is formed from a mixture that excludes carbon particles.
  • 4. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 1, wherein a ratio between the projectile diameter to the cavity diameter further dictates the depth of penetration of the target.
  • 5. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 4, wherein the ratio between the projectile diameter to the cavity diameter is greater than 2.5:1.
  • 6. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 4, wherein the ratio between the projectile diameter to the cavity diameter is less than 2.5:1.
  • 7. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 1, wherein the cavity depth to the cavity diameter defines an aspect ratio that dictates the depth of penetration of the target.
  • 8. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 7, wherein the aspect ratio is 6.5:1 to 3.5:1.
  • 9. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 7, wherein the aspect ratio is 3.4:1 to 2:1.
  • 10. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 7, wherein the aspect ratio is 1.9:1 to 0.1:1.
  • 11. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 1, wherein the cavity bottom is V-shaped in cross-section.
  • 12. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 1, wherein the cavity bottom is U-shaped in cross-section.
  • 13. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 1, wherein the cavity bottom is flat in cross-section.
  • 14. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 1, wherein the cavity bottom is round in cross-section.
  • 15. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 1, wherein the cavity sidewall is stepped in cross-section.
  • 16. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 1, wherein the target is hardened, the composite projectile being configured to deliver a retained mass into the hardened target upon impact.
  • 17. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 1, wherein the target is a soft target, the composite projectile being configured to disintegrate upon impact with the soft target.
  • 18. A molded frangible composite projectile, comprising: a leading end;a trailing end, the leading and trailing ends being monolithically molded from a mixture including 85-95% metallic particles and less than 10% of a polymer;a projectile diameter; anda cavity formed within the composite projectile, the cavity defining a cavity opening, a cavity depth, a cavity diameter, a cavity sidewall, and a cavity bottom and being configured to induce pressure within the cavity and disintegration of the composite projectile upon impact with a target, the cavity opening being at least concentric with the cavity sidewall.
  • 19. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 18, wherein the projectile diameter and the cavity diameter define a ratio to induce pressure and dictate a depth of penetration of the target.
  • 20. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 18, wherein the cavity depth and cavity diameter define an aspect ratio dictating a depth of penetration of the target.
  • 21. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 18, wherein the cavity sidewall is formed at an angle in a direction away from the cavity opening and towards the cavity bottom such that the cavity opening is larger than the cavity bottom, the angle contributing to the pressure within the cavity to dictate a rate of expansion.
  • 22. The molded frangible composite projectile as in claim 18, wherein the cavity bottom defines a shape configured to dictate degrees of disintegration of the composite projectile.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/936,301 filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) on Jul. 22, 2020, which claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/162,179, filed in the USPTO on Oct. 16, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,760,885, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/573,632, filed in the USPTO on Oct. 17, 2017, all of which are incorporated by reference thereto in their entireties.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62573632 Oct 2017 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16936301 Jul 2020 US
Child 18381506 US
Parent 16162179 Oct 2018 US
Child 16936301 US