Patent Application
20220190181
The present disclosure relates to multijunction solar cells and the fabrication of such solar cells, and more particularly the design and specification of the band gaps in a four or five junction solar cells based on III-V semiconductor compounds to provide greatest efficiency in orbit in a radiation environment or in a space vehicle over an operational lifetime from five to fifteen years.
Solar power from photovoltaic cells, also called solar cells, has been predominantly provided by silicon semiconductor technology. In the past several years, however, high-volume manufacturing of III-V compound semiconductor multijunction solar cells for space applications has accelerated the development of such technology not only for use in space but also for terrestrial solar power applications. Compared to silicon, III-V compound semiconductor multijunction devices have greater energy conversion efficiencies and generally more radiation resistance, although they tend to be more complex to manufacture. Typical commercial III-V compound semiconductor multijunction solar cells have energy efficiencies that exceed 27% under one sun, air mass 0 (AM0), illumination, whereas even the most efficient silicon technologies generally reach only about 18% efficiency under comparable conditions. Under high solar concentration (e.g., 500×), commercially available III-V compound semiconductor multijunction solar cells in terrestrial applications (at AM1.5D) have energy efficiencies that exceed 37%. The higher conversion efficiency of III-V compound semiconductor solar cells compared to silicon solar cells is in part based on the ability to achieve spectral splitting of the incident radiation through the use of a plurality of photovoltaic regions with different band gap energies, and accumulating the current from each of the regions.
In satellite and other space related applications, the size, mass and cost of a satellite power system are dependent on the power and energy conversion efficiency of the solar cells used. Putting it another way, the size of the payload and the availability of on-board services are proportional to the amount of power provided. Thus, as payloads become more sophisticated, and applications anticipated for five, ten, twenty or more years, the power-to-weight ratio and lifetime efficiency of a solar cell becomes increasingly more important, and there is increasing interest not only the amount of power provided at initial deployment, but over the entire service life of the satellite system, or in terms of a design specification, the amount of power provided at a specific future time, often referred to as the “end of life” (EOL).
The efficiency of energy conversion, which converts solar energy (or photons) to electrical energy, depends on various factors such as the design of solar cell structures, the choice of semiconductor materials, and the thickness of each subcell, in short, the energy conversion efficiency for each solar cell is dependent on the optimum utilization of the available sunlight across the solar spectrum as well as the “age” of the solar cell, i.e. the length of time it has been deployed and subject to degradation associated with the temperature and radiation in the deployed space environment. As such, the characteristic of sunlight absorption in semiconductor material, also known as photovoltaic properties, is critical to determine the most efficient semiconductor to achieve the optimum energy conversion to meet customer requirements of intended orbit and lifetime.
Typical III-V compound semiconductor solar cells are fabricated on a semiconductor wafer in vertical, multijunction structures or stacked sequence of solar subcells, each subcell formed with appropriate semiconductor layers and including a p-n photoactive junction. Each subcell is designed to convert photons over different spectral or wavelength bands to electrical current. After the sunlight impinges on the front of the solar cell, and photons pass through the subcells, the photons in a wavelength band that are not absorbed and converted to electrical energy in the region of one subcell propagate to the next subcell, where such photons are intended to be captured and converted to electrical energy, assuming the downstream subcell is designed for the photon's particular wavelength or energy band.
The individual solar cells or wafers are then disposed in horizontal arrays, with the individual solar cells connected together in an electrical series and/or parallel circuit. The shape and structure of an array, as well as the number of cells it contains, are determined in part by the desired output voltage and current.
The electrical characteristics of a solar cell, such as the short circuit current (Jsc), the open circuit voltage (Voc), and the fill factor (FF), are affected by such factors as the number of subcells, the thickness of each subcell, the composition and doping of each active layer in a subcell, and the consequential band structure, electron energy levels, conduction, and absorption of each subcell, as well as its exposure to radiation in the ambient environment over time. The overall power output and conversion efficiency of the solar cell are thereby affected in different and often unpredictable ways. Such factors also vary over time (i.e. during the operational life of the system).
The designation and specification of such material parameters is a non-trivial engineering undertaking, and would vary depending upon the specific space mission and customer design requirements. Such design variables are interdependent and interact in complex and often unpredictable ways. Accordingly, it is evident that the consideration of any one material design parameter or variable, such as the amount of a particular constituent element in a layer, and therefore the resulting band gap of that layer, affects each of the electrical characteristics Jsc, Voc and FF in a different way, sometimes in opposite directions. Thus, such changes do not predictably lead to an increase in power output or solar cell efficiency. Stated another way, focus on any single such material parameter in the design of a multijunction solar cell is not a viable design paradigm or calculus since each variable standing alone is NOT a simple “result effective variable” that can be mindlessly increased or decreased in order to achieve greater power output by those skilled in the art confronted with complex design specifications and practical operational considerations or related design objectives.
To reinforce the above observation, the present disclosure identifies a combination of two electrical parameters associated with a subcell and notes how the value of the combination changes over the generational lifetime of the solar cell, which is different for each subcell (since each subcell has a different band gap).
The electrical parameter of consideration taught by the present disclosure is the difference between the band gap and the open circuit voltage, or (Eg/q−Voc), of a particular active layer. The value of such parameter may vary depending on subcell layer thicknesses, doping, the composition of adjacent layers (such as tunnel diodes), and even the specific wafer being examined from a set of wafers processed on a single supporting platter in a reactor run, but consideration of that parameter has led to new design paradigms which enable improvement in the end-of-life efficiency of a multijunction solar cell.
Another important mechanical or structural consideration in the choice of semiconductor layers for a solar cell is the desirability of the adjacent layers of semiconductor materials in the solar cell, i.e. each layer of crystalline semiconductor material that is deposited and grown to form a solar subcell, have similar or substantially similar crystal lattice constants or parameters.
Here again there are trade-offs between including specific elements in the composition of a layer which may result in improved voltage associated with such subcell and therefore potentially a greater power output, and deviation from exact crystal lattice matching with adjoining layers as a consequence of including such elements in the layer which may result in a higher probability of defects, and therefore lower manufacturing yield.
In that connection, it should be noted that there is no strict definition of what is understood to mean two adjacent layers are “lattice matched” or “lattice mismatched”. For purposes in this disclosure, “lattice mismatched” refers to two adjacently disposed materials or layers (with thicknesses of greater than 100 nm) having in-plane lattice constants of the materials in their fully relaxed state differing from one another by more than 0.1% in lattice constant. (Applicant notes that this definition is considerably more stringent than that proposed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 8,962,993, which suggests more than 0.6% lattice constant difference as defining “lattice mismatched” layers).
The conventional wisdom for many years has been that in a monolithic tandem solar cell, “ . . . the desired optical transparency and current conductivity between the top and bottom cells . . . would be best achieved by lattice matching the top cell material to the bottom cell material. Mismatches in the lattice constants create defects or dislocations in the crystal lattice where recombination centers can occur to cause the loss of photogenerated minority carriers, thus significantly degrading the photovoltaic quality of the device. More specifically, such effects will decrease the open circuit voltage (Voc), short circuit current (Jsc), and fill factor (FF), which represents the relationship or balance between current and voltage for effective output” (Jerry M. Olson, U.S. Pat. No. 4,667,059, “Current and Lattice Matched Tandem Solar Cell”).
As progress has been made toward higher efficiency multijunction solar cells with four or more subcells, nevertheless, “it is conventionally assumed that substantially lattice-matched designs are desirable because they have proven reliability and because they use less semiconductor material than metamorphic solar cells, which require relatively thick buffer layers to accommodate differences in the lattice constants of the various materials” (Rebecca Elizabeth Jones-Albertus et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,962,993).
The present disclosure proposes design features for multijunction solar cells which departs from such conventional wisdom for increasing the efficiency of the multijunction solar cell in converting solar energy (or photons) to electrical energy and optimizing such efficiency at the “end-of-life” period, rather than at the “beginning-of-life” (BOL).
In addition to implementing a lattice mismatching designed paradigm, another concern in the conventional wisdom is the use of compounds like aluminum which exacerbates material quality, and therefore the efficiency and manufacturability of the solar cell.
The present disclosure proposes further new design features by implementing as many high band gap subcells as possible to increase the solar cell efficiency, notwithstanding that specifying such high band gap subcells require the use of increasing amounts of aluminum in such subcells, contrary to the conventional wisdom.
It is an object of the present disclosure to increase the efficiency of solar cells by including a high degree of aluminum in the upper solar subcells so as to increase their bandgap.
It is another object of the present disclosure to provide a metamorphic multijunction solar cell in which increased amounts of aluminum have been included in the composition of one or more subcells so that their band gaps have been designed to maximize the photoconversion efficiency of the solar cell.
It is another object of the present disclosure to provide in a multijunction solar cell in which the selection of the composition of the subcells and their band gaps maximizes the efficiency of the solar cell at a predetermined temperature (in the range of 28 to 70 degrees Centigrade) and radiation environment in deployment in space at AM0 at a predetermined time after the initial deployment, such time being at least (i) one year; (ii) five years; (iii) ten years; or (iv) fifteen years, in a specific orbit or space mission.
It is another object of the present disclosure to provide an upright, tandem four or five junction solar cell with one metamorphic layer in which the average band gap of all four cells (i.e., the sum of the individual four band gaps of each of the four subcells, divided by four) is greater than (i) 1.44 eV; or (ii) 1.35 eV; or (iii) 1.30 eV; or (iv) 1.25 eV.
It is another object of the present disclosure to provide a lattice mismatched four junction solar cell in which the current through the bottom subcell is intentionally designed to be substantially greater than current through the top three subcells when measured at the “beginning-of-life” or time of initial deployment.
Some implementations of the present disclosure may incorporate or implement fewer of the aspects and features noted in the foregoing objects.
A technical objective provided by examples in the present disclosure may be regarded as increasing the efficiency and performance of a multijunction solar cell, in particular, at the “end-of-life” after the solar cell has subjected to radiation at the level of 1E15 at 70° C. or more.
More specifically, the present disclosure is directed to an improved design of a four junction upright metamorphic solar cell in which the third solar subcell (hereinafter, referred to as solar subcell “C”) from the top or light-facing surface of the solar cell after deployment, with a bandgap in the range of 1.0 eV to 1.35 eV and composition of InGaAs, has been subject to radiation at a level of 1E15 at 70° C., with the design paradigm of utilizing relatively high band gaps in the top or upper subcells by using a substantial amount of aluminum in their composition to increase the bandgaps.
Another challenge to be addressed by the present disclosure may be described as how to increase the efficiency and performance of a multijunction solar cell after subjection to radiation as experienced in a variety of earth orbits which has a deleterious effect on the current produced by certain solar subcells exposed to radiation, which therefore results in lower overall power produced by the solar cell.
All ranges of numerical parameters set forth in this disclosure are to be understood to encompass any and all subranges or “intermediate generalizations” subsumed therein. For example, a stated range of “1.0 to 2.0 eV” for a band gap value should be considered to include any and all subranges beginning with a minimum value of 1.0 eV or more and ending with a maximum value of 2.0 eV or less, e.g., 1.0 eV to 1.2 eV, or 1.3 eV to 1.4 eV, or 1.5 eV to 1.9 eV.
Briefly, and in general terms, the present disclosure provides a multifunction solar cell comprising: a growth substrate; a first solar subcell disposed over or in the growth substrate; a tunnel diode disposed over the first solar subcell; a grading interlayer directly disposed over the tunnel diode; a sequence of layers of semiconductor material forming a solar cell disposed over the grading interlayer comprising a plurality of subcells including a second solar subcell disposed over and lattice mismatched with respect to the growth substrate, and at least a third solar subcell disposed over the second subcell; wherein the grading interlayer has a band gap equal to or greater than that of the second subcell and is compositionally graded to lattice match the growth substrate on one side and the second subcell on the other side; and being composed of any of the As, P, N, Sb based III-V compound semiconductors subject to the constraints of having the in-plane lattice parameter in each of the sublayers of the grading interlayer throughout its thickness being greater than the lattice constant of the growth substrate; and a fourth or upper subcell disposed over the third solar subcell and having an aluminium content in excess of 17.5% by mole fraction, and a band gap in the range of 1.95 eV to 2.20 eV.
In some embodiments, the fourth or upper solar subcell has an aluminum content in excess of 20% by mole fraction; or optionally in excess of 25% by mole fraction; or optionally in excess of 27.5% by mole fraction.
In some embodiments, the third solar subcell has an aluminum content in excess of 17.5% by mole fraction; or optionally in excess of 20% by mole fraction.
In some embodiments, the third and fourth solar subcells are lattice matched to the second solar subcell.
In some embodiments, the second solar subcell has a band gap in the range of 1.06 eV to 1.41 eV; the third solar subcell has a band gap in the range of approximately 1.35 eV to 1.70 eV; and the fourth or upper subcell disposed over the third solar subcell has an aluminum content in excess of 20% by mole fraction, a band gap in the range of 1.95 eV to 2.20 eV.
In some embodiments, the fourth or upper subcell is composed of indium gallium aluminium phosphide; the third solar subcell is composed of (aluminum) indium gallium arsenide; the third solar subcell includes an emitter layer composed of indium, gallium, phosphide or aluminum, indium, gallium, arsenide, and a base layer composed of aluminum, indium, gallium, arsenide; the second solar subcell is composed of indium, gallium, arsenide, the first solar subcell is composed of germanium; and the graded interlayer is composed of (InxGa1-x)y)Al1-yAs with 0<x<1, 0<y<1, and in some embodiments, the band gap of the graded interlayer is constant throughout its thickness.
In some embodiments, the fourth or upper subcell is composed of a semiconductor compound including at least aluminum, indium and phosphorus, and having an aluminum content in excess of 17.5 by mole fraction, and a band gap in the range of 1.95 eV to 2.20 eV.
In some embodiments, the third subcell is composed of a semiconductor compound including at least indium, gallium, arsenic and phosphorus.
In another aspect the present disclosure provides a multijunction solar cell comprising: a growth substrate; a first solar subcell disposed over or in the growth substrate; a sequence of layers of semiconductor material forming a solar cell disposed over the growth substrate comprising a plurality of subcells including a second solar subcell disposed over and lattice matched with respect to the growth substrate, and a least a third solar subcell disposed over the second solar subcell; and a forth or upper subcell disposed over and lattice matched to the third solar subcell and having aluminum content in excess of 17.5% by mole fraction, and a band gap in the range of 1.95 eV to 2.20 eV.
In some embodiments, the multijunction solar cell comprises: a germanium growth substrate; a first solar subcell disposed over or in the growth substrate; a graded interlayer disposed over the growth substrate, followed by a sequence of layers of semiconductor material using a deposition process to form a solar cell comprising a plurality of subcells including: a first middle subcell disposed over and lattice mismatched with respect to the growth substrate and having a band gap in the range of 1.0 eV to 1.41 eV; a second middle subcell disposed over the middle subcell and having a band gap in the range of approximately 1.35 to 1.66 eV; a third middle subcell disposed over and lattice mismatched with respect to the growth substrate and having a band gap in the range of 1.665 eV to 1.95 eV; and an upper subcell disposed over the last middle subcell and having an aluminum content in excess of 17.5% by mole fraction, and a band gap in the range of 1.95 eV to 2.20 eV.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method of manufacturing a multijunction solar cell comprising: providing a growth substrate; forming a first solar subcell in the growth substrate; growing a grading interlayer over the growth substrate, followed by growing a sequence of layers of semiconductor material using a disposition process to form a solar cell comprising a plurality of subcells including a first middle subcell disposed over and lattice mismatched with respect to the growth substrate and having a band gap in the range of 1.3 eV to 1.6 eV, at least a second middle subcell disposed over the third subcell and having a band gap in the range of approximately 1.65 eV to 1.8 eV, and an upper subcell disposed over the last middle subcell and having a band gap in the range of 2.0 eV to 2.20 eV.
In some embodiments, the upper subcell is composed of indium, gallium, aluminum phosphide; the third middle solar subcell includes an emitter layer composed of indium, gallium phosphide or aluminum, gallium, arsenide, and a base layer composed of indium, aluminum, gallium, arsenide or an indium, gallium, arsenide, phosphide base and emitter layer, with the base layer and the emitter layer forming a photovoltaic junction; the second middle solar subcell is composed of indium gallium arsenide; the first solar subcell is composed of germanium; and the graded interlayer is composed of InxGa1-x-yAlyAs with 0<x<1, 0<y<1.
In some embodiments, the upper solar subcell is composed of a semiconductor compound including at least aluminum, indium, and phosphorus.
In some embodiments, the third middle solar subcell is (directly below the upper solar subcell) is composed of a semiconductor compound including at least indium, gallium, arsenic and phosphorus.
In some embodiments, the band gap of the graded interlayer remains at a constant value in the range of 1.22 eV to 1.75 eV throughout its thickness.
In some embodiments, the concentration of aluminum in the graded interlayer remains constant at a value in the range of 5 to 25% throughout its thickness.
In some embodiments, a four junction solar cell is provided, in which the fourth subcell or growth substrate has a band gap in the range of approximately 0.67 eV, the first middle subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.41 eV, the second middle subcell has a band gap in the range of approximately 1.65 to 1.8 eV, and the upper subcell has a band gap in the range of 2.0 eV to 2.20 eV.
Another descriptive aspect of the present disclosure is to characterize the fourth subcell as having a direct band gap of greater than 0.75 eV. The indirect band gap of germanium at room temperature is about 0.67 eV, while the direct band gap of germanium at room temperature is about 0.8 eV. Those skilled in the art will normally refer to the “band gap” of germanium as 0.67 eV, since it is lower than the direct band gap value of 0.8 eV.
The recitation that “the fourth subcell has a direct band gap of greater than 0.75 eV” is therefore expressly meant to include germanium as a possible semiconductor for the fourth subcell, although other semiconductor material can be used as well.
In some embodiments, the second middle subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.66 eV and the upper subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.95 eV.
In some embodiments of a five junction solar cell the bottom subcell or growth substrate is composed of germanium, the first middle subcell is composed of indium, gallium, arsenide; the second middle solar subcell includes an emitter layer composed of indium, gallium phosphide or aluminum indium gallium arsenide, and a base layer composed of aluminum, indium, gallium arsenide; the third middle solar subcell is composed of (aluminum) indium gallium phosphide or an AlInGaAs with a InGaP emitter; and the upper subcell is composed of aluminum, indium, gallium, phosphide.
In some embodiments of a five junction solar cell, the first solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 0.67 eV, the first middle subcell has a band gap in the range of 1.0 eV to 1.41 eV, the second middle subcell has a band gap in the range of 1.35 to 1.66 eV, but greater than the first middle subcell, the third middle subcell has a band gap in the range of 1.665 to 1.95 eV and the upper subcell has a band gap in the range of 1.95 to 2.20 eV.
In some embodiments, there further comprises providing a distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) structure adjacent to and between the second and the third middle solar subcells and composed of a plurality of alternating layers of lattice mismatched materials with discontinuities in their respective indices of refraction and arranged so that light can enter and pass through the third solar subcell and at least a first portion of which light having a first spectral width wavelength range, including the band gap of the third solar subcell, can be reflected back into the third solar subcell by the DBR structure, and a second portion of which light in a second spectral width wavelength range corresponding to longer wavelengths than the first spectral width wavelength range can be transmitted through the DBR structure to the second and further solar subcells disposed beneath the DBR structure.
In some embodiments, the tunnel diode is directly grown over the growth substrate, with the graded interlayer directly grown over the tunnel diode, and the DBR structure is grown over the graded interlayer.
In some embodiments, the graded interlayer is directly grown over the growth substrate with the tunnel diode directly grown over the graded interlayer, and the DBR structure grown over the tunnel diode.
In some embodiments, the DBR structure is directly grown over the growth substrate with the graded interlayer directly grown over the DBR structure, and a tunnel diode grown over the DBR structure.
In some embodiments, the DBR structure is directly grown over the growth substrate with the tunnel diode directly grown over the DBR structure, and the graded interlayer is grown over the tunnel diode.
In some embodiments, graded interlayer is directly grown over the growth substrate with the DBR structure directly grown over the graded interlayer, and the tunnel diode grown over the DBR structure.
In some embodiments, the tunnel diode is directly grown over the growth substrate, with the DBR structure directly grown over the tunnel diode, and the graded interlayer grown over the DBR structure.
In some embodiments, the difference in refractive indices between the alternating layers in the DBR structure is maximized in order to minimize the number of periods required to achieve a given reflectivity, and the thickness and refractive index of each period of the DBR structure determines the stop band and its limiting wavelength, and wherein the DBR structure includes a first DBR sublayer composed of a plurality of n type or p type InxGa1-x-yAlyAs layers, where 0<x<1, 0<y<1, and a second DBR sublayer disposed over the first DBR sublayer and composed of a plurality of n type or p type InxGa1-x-zAlzAs layers, where 0<x<1, 0<z<1, and z is greater than x.
In some embodiments, a tunnel diode is directly disposed over the first solar subcell, and where the grading interlayer is disposed over the tunnel diode, and the DBR structure is disposed over the grading interlayer.
In some embodiments, the grading interlayer is disposed over the first solar subcell, the DBR structure is disposed over the grading interlayer, and further comprising a tunnel diode disposed over the DBR structure and below the second solar subcell.
In some embodiments, the grading interlayer is disposed over the first solar subcell and further comprising a tunnel diode disposed over the grading interlayer and wherein, the DBR structure is disposed over the grading interlayer and below the second solar subcell.
In some embodiments, one or more of the subcells (i) have a base region having a gradation in doping that increases exponentially from a value in the range of 1×1015 to 1×1018 free carriers per cubic centimeter adjacent the p-n junction to a value in the range of 1×1016 to 4×1018 free carriers per cubic centimeter adjacent to the adjoining layer at the rear of the base, and (ii) have an emitter region having a gradation in doping that decreases from a value in the range of approximately 5×1018 to 1×1017 free carriers per cubic centimeter in the region immediately adjacent the adjoining layer to a value in the range of 5×1015 to 1×1018 free carriers per cubic centimeter in the region adjacent to the p-n junction.
In some embodiments, a layer of InGaAs, GaAsSb, InAsP, InAlAs, or SiGeSn, InGaAsN, InGaAsNSb, InGaAsNBi, InGaAsNSbBi, InGaSbN, InGaBiN or InGaSbBiN is deposited over the growth substrate.
In some embodiments, the selection of the composition of the subcells and their band gaps maximizes the efficiency of the solar cell at a predetermined temperature value (between 28 and 70 degrees Centigrade) at a predetermined time after the initial deployment in space, (the time of the initial deployment being referred to as the “beginning-of-life (BOL)”), such predetermined time being referred to as the “end-of-life (FOL)” time, and such time being at least one year.
In some embodiments, the selection of the composition of the subcells and their band gaps maximizes the efficiency of the solar cell at a predetermined low intensity (less than 0.1 suns) and low temperature value (less than 100 degrees Centigrade) in deployment in space at a predetermined time after the initial deployment in space, or the “beginning-of-life (BOL)”, such predetermined time being referred to as the “end-of-life (EOL)” time, and being at least one year.
In some embodiments, the maximization of solar cell efficiency at EOL is achieved by a design paradigm, wherein the composition of the subcells are not designed to maximize the solar cell efficiency at the BOL, but to increase the solar cell efficiency at the EOL while disregarding the solar cell efficiency at the BOL, such that the solar cell efficiency at the BOL is less than the solar cell efficiency at the BOL that would be achieved if the selection were designed to maximize the solar cell efficiency at the BOL.
In some embodiments, of a four junction solar cell, the average band gap of all four subcells (i.e., the sum of the four band gaps of each subcell divided by four) is greater than 1.44 eV; or optionally is greater than 1.35 eV; or optionally is greater than 1.30 eV; or optionally is greater than 1.25 eV.
In some embodiments, in a four junction solar cell, the band gap of the second middle subcell is approximately 1.35 eV and the average band gap of all four subcells (i.e., the sum of the four band gaps of each subcell divided by four) is greater than 1.25 eV; or optionally, the band gap of the second middle subcell is approximately 1.30 eV and the average band gap of all four subcells (i.e., the sum of the four band gaps of each subcell divided by four) is greater than 1.25 eV; or optionally, the band gap of the second middle subcell is approximately 1.25 eV and the average band gap of all four subcells (i.e., the sum of the four band gaps of each subcell divided by four) is greater than 1.25 eV. [67] In some embodiments, in a four junction solar cell, the band gap of the second middle subcell is approximately 1.30 eV and the average band gap of all four subcells (i.e. the sum of the four band gaps of each subcell divided by four) is greater than 1.25 eV.
In some embodiments, in a four junction solar cell, the band gap of the second middle subcell is approximately 1.25 eV and the average band gap of all four subcells (i.e. the sum of the four band gaps of each subcell divided by four) is greater than 1.25 eV.
In some embodiments, the first solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 0.67 eV, the second solar subcell has a band gap of 1.41 eV or less, the third solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.55 to 1.8 eV and the fourth or upper solar subcell has a band gap in the range of 2.0 to 2.2 eV.
In some embodiments, the third solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.73 eV and the fourth or upper solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 2.10 eV.
In some embodiments, the fourth or upper solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 2.05 to 2.10 eV, the third solar subcell has a band gap in the range of 1.55 to 1.73 eV; and the second solar subcell has a band gap in the range of 1.15 to 1.41 eV.
In some embodiments, the upper first solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 2.10 eV, the second solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.73 eV; and the third solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.41 eV.
In some embodiments, the fourth or upper solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 2.10 eV, the third solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.65 eV; and the second solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.3 eV.
In some embodiments, the fourth or upper solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 2.05 eV, the third solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.55 eV; and the second solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.2 eV.
In some embodiments of a four junction solar cell, the fourth or upper solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 2.05 eV.
In some embodiments of a four junction solar cell, the band gap of the second solar subcell is less than 1.41 eV, and greater than that of the first solar subcell.
In some embodiments of a four junction solar cell, the second solar subcell has a band gap in the range of 1.15 to 1.35 eV; or optionally a band gap in the range of 1.1 to 1.2 eV.
In some embodiments of a four junction solar cell, the second solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.1 eV to 1.2 eV.
In some embodiments of a four junction solar cell, the second solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.2 eV.
In some embodiments, the first solar subcell has a band gap of 0.67 eV, the second solar subcell has a band gap in the range of approximately 1.41 eV, the third solar subcell has a band gap in the range of approximately 1.6 to 1.8 eV and the fourth or upper solar subcell has a band gap in the range of 2.0 to 2.20 eV.
In some embodiments, the first solar subcell has a band gap of 0.67 eV, the second subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.41 eV, the third subcell has a band gap of 1.736 eV and the fourth or upper solar subcell has a band gap of 2.1 eV.
In some embodiments, the first solar subcell has a band gap of 0.67 eV, the second middle subcell has a band gap of approximately of 1.265 eV, the third middle subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.88 eV and the fourth or upper solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 2.1 eV.
In some embodiments, the third subcell has a band gap of approximately 1.73 eV and the fourth or upper solar subcell has a band gap of approximately 2.10 eV.
In some embodiments of a five junction solar cell, the first solar subcell has a band gap of 0.67 eV, the second solar subcell has a band gap in the range of 1.06 eV to 1.41 eV, the third solar subcell has a band gap in the range of 1.35 eV to 1.66 eV but greater than the second solar subcell, the fourth solar subcell has a band gap in the range of 1.665 to 1.95 eV and the fifth or upper solar subcell has a band gap in the range of 1.95 eV to 2.20 eV but greater than that of the fourth solar subcell.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a four junction solar cell comprising an upper first solar subcell composed of a semiconductor material having a first band gap; a second solar subcell adjacent to said first solar subcell and composed of a semiconductor material having a second band gap smaller than the first band gap and being lattice matched with the upper first solar subcell; a third solar subcell adjacent to said second solar subcell and composed of a semiconductor material having a third band gap smaller than the second band gap and being lattice matched with the second solar subcell; and a fourth solar subcell adjacent to and lattice mismatched to said third solar subcell and composed of a semiconductor material having a fourth band gap smaller than the third band gap; wherein the average band gap of all four subcells (i.e., the sum of the four band gaps of each subcell divided by four) is greater than 1.35 eV, or optionally greater than 1.44 eV.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a four junction solar cell comprising an upper first solar subcell composed of a semiconductor material having a first band gap; a second solar subcell adjacent to said first solar subcell and composed of a semiconductor material having a second band gap smaller than the first band gap and being lattice matched with the upper first solar subcell; a third solar subcell adjacent to said second solar subcell and composed of a semiconductor material having a third band gap smaller than the second band gap and being lattice matched with the second solar subcell; a graded interlayer adjacent to said third solar subcell, said graded interlayer having a fourth band gap greater than said third band gap; and a fourth solar subcell adjacent to said third solar subcell and composed of a semiconductor material having a fifth band gap smaller than the fourth band gap and being lattice mismatched with the third solar subcell; wherein the graded interlayer is compositionally graded to lattice match the third solar subcell on one side and the lower fourth solar subcell on the other side, and is composed of any of the As, P, N, Sb based III-V compound semiconductors subject to the constraints of having the in-plane lattice parameter less than or equal to that of the third solar subcell and greater than or equal to that of the lower fourth solar subcell; wherein the fourth subcell has a direct band gap of greater than 0.75 eV.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method of manufacturing a four junction solar cell comprising providing a germanium substrate; growing on the germanium substrate a sequence of layers of semiconductor material using a semiconductor disposition process to form a solar cell comprising a plurality of subcells including a metamorphic layer, third subcell disposed over the metamorphic layer and having a band gap of approximately 1.41 eV, a second subcell disposed over the third subcell and having a band gap in the range of approximately 1.6 eV to 1.8 eV, and an upper first subcell disposed over the second subcell and having a band gap in the range of 2.0 eV to 2.20 eV.
In some embodiments, there further comprises forming (i) a back surface field (BSF) layer disposed directly adjacent to the bottom surface of the third subcell, and (ii) at least one distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) layer directly below the BSF layer so that light can enter and pass through the first, second and third subcells and at least a portion of which be reflected back into the third subcell by the DBR layer.
In some embodiments, additional layer(s) may be added or deleted in the cell structure without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
Some implementations of the present disclosure may incorporate or implement fewer of the aspects and features noted in the foregoing summaries.
Additional aspects, advantages, and novel features of the present disclosure will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this disclosure, including the following detailed description as well as by practice of the disclosure. While the disclosure is described below with reference to preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the disclosure is not limited thereto. Those of ordinary skill in the art having access to the teachings herein will recognize additional applications, modifications and embodiments in other fields, which are within the scope of the disclosure as disclosed and claimed herein and with respect to which the disclosure could be of utility.
The disclosure will be better and more fully appreciated by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
“III-V compound semiconductor” refers to a compound semiconductor formed using at least one element from group III of the periodic table and at least one element from group V of the periodic table. III-V compound semiconductors include binary, tertiary and quaternary compounds. Group III includes boron (B), aluminum (Al), gallium (Ga), indium (In) and thallium (T). Group V includes nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), antimony (Sb) and bismuth (Bi).
“Average band gap” of a multijunction solar cell is the numerical average of the lowest band gap material in each subcell of the multifunction solar cell.
“Band gap” refers to an energy difference (e.g., in electron volts (eV)) separating the top of the valence band and the bottom of the conduction band of a semiconductor material.
“Beginning of Life (BOL)” refers to the time at which a photovoltaic power system is initially deployed in operation.
“Bottom subcell” refers to the subcell in a multijunction solar cell which is furthest from the primary light source for the solar cell.
“Compound semiconductor” refers to a semiconductor formed using two or more chemical elements.
“Current density” refers to the short circuit current density Jsc through a solar subcell through a given planar area, or volume, of semiconductor material constituting the solar subcell.
“Deposited”, with respect to a layer of semiconductor material, refers to a layer of material which is epitaxially grown over another semiconductor layer.
“End of Life (EOL)” refers to a predetermined time or times after the Beginning of Life, during which the photovoltaic power system has been deployed and has been operational. The EOL time or times may, for example, be specified by the customer as part of the required technical performance specifications of the photovoltaic power system to allow the solar cell designer to define the solar cell subcells and sublayer compositions of the solar cell to meet the technical performance requirement at the specified time or times, in addition to other design objectives. The terminology “EOL” is not meant to suggest that the photovoltaic power system is not operational or does not produce power after the EOL time.
“Graded interlayer” (or “grading interlayer”)—see “metamorphic layer”.
“Inverted metamorphic multijunction solar cell” or “IMM solar cell” refers to a solar cell in which the subcells are deposited or grown on a substrate in a “reverse” sequence such that the higher band gap subcells, which are to be the “top” subcells facing the solar radiation in the final deployment configuration, are deposited or grown on a growth substrate prior to depositing or growing the lower band gap subcells, following which the growth substrate is removed leaving the epitaxial structure.
“Layer” refers to a relatively planar sheet or thickness of semiconductor or other material. The layer may be deposited or grown, e.g., by epitaxial or other techniques.
“Lattice mismatched” refers to two adjacently disposed materials or layers (with thicknesses of greater than 100 nm) having in-plane lattice constants of the materials in their fully relaxed state differing from one another by more than 0.1% in lattice constant. (Applicant expressly adopts this definition for the purpose of this disclosure, and notes that this definition is considerably more stringent than that proposed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 8,962,993, which suggests more than 0.6% lattice constant difference).
“Metamorphic layer” or “graded interlayer” refers to a layer that achieves a gradual transition in lattice constant generally throughout its thickness in a semiconductor structure.
“Middle subcell” refers to a subcell in a multijunction solar cell which is neither a Top Subcell (as defined herein) nor a Bottom Subcell (as defined herein).
“Short circuit current (Isc)” refers to the amount of electrical current through a solar cell or solar subcell when the voltage across the solar cell is zero volts, as represented and measured, for example, in units of milliamps.
“Short circuit current density”—see “current density”.
“Solar cell” refers to an electro-optical semiconductor device operable to convert the energy of light directly into electricity by the photovoltaic effect.
“Solar cell assembly” refers to two or more solar cell subassemblies interconnected electrically with one another.
“Solar cell subassembly” refers to a stacked sequence of layers including one or more solar subcells.
“Solar subcell” refers to a stacked sequence of layers including a p-n photoactive junction composed of semiconductor materials. A solar subcell is designed to convert photons over different spectral or wavelength bands to electrical current.
“Substantially current matched” refers to the short circuit current through adjacent solar subcells being substantially identical (i.e. within plus or minus 1%).
“Top subcell” or “upper subcell” refers to the subcell in a multijunction solar cell which is closest to the primary light source for the solar cell.
“ZTJ” refers to the product designation of a commercially available SolAero Technologies Corp. triple junction solar cell.
Details of the present disclosure will now be described including exemplary aspects and embodiments thereof. Referring to the drawings and the following description, like reference numbers are used to identify like or functionally similar elements, and are intended to illustrate major features of exemplary embodiments in a highly simplified diagrammatic manner. Moreover, the drawings are not intended to depict every feature of the actual embodiment nor the relative dimensions of the depicted elements, and are not drawn to scale.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
A variety of different features of multijunction solar cells (as well as inverted metamorphic multijunction solar cells) are disclosed in the related applications noted above. Some, many or all of such features may be included in the structures and processes associated with the non-inverted or “upright” solar cells of the present disclosure. However, more particularly, the present disclosure is directed to the fabrication of a multijunction lattice mis-matched solar cell grown over a metamorphic layer which is grown on a single growth substrate. More specifically, however, in some embodiments, the present disclosure relates to four or five junction solar cells with direct band gaps in the range of 2.0 eV to 2.15 eV (or higher) for the top subcell with an aluminum content in excess of 17.5% by mole fraction, and (i) 1.6 eV to 1.8 eV, and (ii) 1.41 eV for the middle subcells, and 0.6 eV to 0.8 eV indirect band gap for the bottom subcell, respectively.
The conventional wisdom for many years has been that in a monolithic multijunction tandem solar cell, “ . . . the desired optical transparency and current conductivity between the top and bottom cells . . . would be best achieved by lattice matching the top cell material to the bottom cell material. Mismatches in the lattice constants create defects or dislocations in the crystal lattice where recombination centers can occur to cause the loss of photogenerated minority carriers, thus significantly degrading the photovoltaic quality of the device. More specifically, such effects will decrease the open circuit voltage (Voc), short circuit current (Jsc), and fill factor (FF), which represents the relationship or balance between current and voltage for effective output” (Jerry M. Olson, U.S. Pat. No. 4,667,059, “Current and Lattice Matched Tandem Solar Cell”).
As progress has been made toward higher efficiency multijunction solar cells with four or more subcells, nevertheless, “it is conventionally assumed that substantially lattice-matched designs are desirable because they have proven reliability and because they use less semiconductor material than metamorphic solar cells, which require relatively thick buffer layers to accommodate differences in the lattice constants of the various materials” (Rebecca Elizabeth Jones Albertus et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,962,993).
Even more recently “. . . current output in each subcell must be the same for optimum efficiency in the series-connected configuration” (Richard R. King et al., U.S. Pat. No. 9,099,595).
The present disclosure provides an unconventional four junction design (with three grown lattices matched subcells, which in turn are lattice mismatched to the Ge substrate) that leads to significant performance improvement in an AM0 spectral environment over that of a traditional three junction solar cell on Ge despite the lattice mismatch and substantial current mismatch between the top three subcells and the bottom Ge subcell. This performance gain is especially realized at high temperature and after high exposure to space radiation as a result of the proposal of the present disclosure to incorporate high band gap semiconductors that are inherently more resistant to radiation and temperature in spite of the disadvantages associated with lattice mismatch and current mismatch, and the use of substantial amounts of aluminum in at least the upper subcell.
While the conventional wisdom suggests that the selection of the composition, band gaps, and thickness of each subcell is designed to ensure that the current is matched when operated in an AM0 spectral environment, the present design departs from that teaching and utilizes a design employing higher band gaps than the conventional design, and accordingly, a current mismatch between the upper subcells and the bottom subcell that is substantially greater than current commercial products or other proposed designs.
Although the advance of the present disclosure may be broadly characterized as the deliberate use of lattice mismatching and substantial current mismatching between subcells and high aluminum content in at least the upper solar subcell, in a four junction or five junction solar cell, instead of simply specifying the amount of aluminum (by a mole fraction percentage) in a given solar subcell, another way of characterizing the present disclosure is that in some embodiments of an upright metamorphic four junction solar cell, the average band gap of all four subcells (i.e., the sum of the four band gaps of each subcell divided by four) is greater than a specific value, e.g. 1.44 eV, or optionally 1.30 eV, or optionally 1.25 eV.
In some embodiments, the growth substrate and fourth subcell is germanium, while in other embodiments the fourth subcell is InGaAs, GaAsSb, InAsP, InAlAs, or SiGeSn, InGaAsN, InGaAsNSb, InGaAsNBi, InGaAsNSbBi, InGaSbN, InGaBiN. InGaSbBiN or other III-V or II-VI compound semiconductor material.
Another descriptive aspect of the present disclosure is to characterize the fourth subcell as having a direct band gap of greater than 0.75 eV. The indirect band gap of germanium at room temperature is about 0.67 eV, while the direct band gap of germanium at room temperature is 0.8 eV. Those skilled in the art will normally refer to the “band gap” of germanium as 0.67 eV, since it is lower than the direct band gap value of 0.8 eV.
The recitation that “the fourth subcell has a direct band gap of greater than 0.75 eV” is therefore expressly meant to include germanium as a possible semiconductor for the fourth subcell, although other semiconductor material can be used as well.
More specifically, the present disclosure provides a multijunction solar cell in which the selection of the composition of the subcells and their band gaps maximizes the efficiency of the solar cell at a predetermined high temperature (in the range of 40 to 70 degrees Centigrade) in deployment in space at AM0 at a predetermined time after the initial deployment, such time being at least (i) one year, (ii) five years; (iii) ten years; or (iv) fifteen years.
The disclosure provides a relatively simple and reproducible technique that does not employ inverted processing associated with inverted metamorphic multijunction solar cells, and is suitable for use in a high volume production environment in which various semiconductor layers are grown on a growth substrate in an MOCVD reactor, and subsequent processing steps are defined and selected to minimize any physical damage to the quality of the deposited layers, thereby ensuring a relatively high yield of operable solar cells meeting specifications at the conclusion of the fabrication processes.
The lattice constants and electrical properties of the layers in the semiconductor structure are preferably controlled by specification of appropriate reactor growth temperatures and times, and by use of appropriate chemical composition and dopants. The use of a deposition method, such as Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE), Organo Metallic Vapor Phase Epitaxy (OMVPE), Metal Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition (MOCVD), or other vapor deposition methods for the growth may enable the layers in the monolithic semiconductor structure forming the cell to be grown with the required thickness, elemental composition, dopant concentration and grading and conductivity type.
The present disclosure is directed to, in one embodiment, a growth process using a metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) process in a standard, commercially available reactor suitable for high volume production. More particularly, the present disclosure is directed to the materials and fabrication steps that are particularly suitable for producing commercially viable multijunction solar cells using commercially available equipment and established high-volume fabrication processes, as contrasted with merely academic expositions of laboratory or experimental results.
Prior to discussing the specific embodiments of the solar cell of the present disclosure, a brief discussion of some of the issues associated with the design of multijunction solar cells, and in particular metamorphic solar cells, and the context of the composition or deposition of various specific layers in embodiments of the product as specified and defined by Applicant is in order.
There are a multitude of properties that should be considered in specifying and selecting the composition of, inter alia, a specific semiconductor layer, the back metal layer, the adhesive or bonding material, or the composition of the supporting material for mounting a solar cell thereon. For example, some of the properties that should be considered when selecting a particular layer or material are electrical properties (e.g. conductivity), optical properties (e.g., band gap, absorbance and reflectance), structural properties (e.g., thickness, strength, flexibility, Young's modulus, etc.), chemical properties (e.g., growth rates, the “sticking coefficient” or ability of one layer to adhere to another, stability of dopants and constituent materials with respect to adjacent layers and subsequent processes, etc.), thermal properties (e.g., thermal stability under temperature changes, coefficient of thermal expansion), and manufacturability (e.g., availability of materials, process complexity, process variability and tolerances, reproducibility of results over high volume, reliability and quality control issues).
In view of the trade-offs among these properties, it is not always evident that the selection of a material based on one of its characteristic properties is always or typically “the best” or “optimum” from a commercial standpoint or for Applicant's purposes. For example, theoretical studies may suggest the use of a quaternary material with a certain band gap for a particular subcell would be the optimum choice for that subcell layer based on fundamental semiconductor physics. As an example, the teachings of academic papers and related proposals for the design of very high efficiency (over 40%) solar cells may therefore suggest that a solar cell designer specify the use of a quaternary material (e.g., InGaAsP) for the active layer of a subcell. A few such devices may actually be fabricated by other researchers, efficiency measurements made, and the results published as an example of the ability of such researchers to advance the progress of science by increasing the demonstrated efficiency of a compound semiconductor multijunction solar cell. Although such experiments and publications are of “academic” interest, from the practical perspective of the Applicants in designing a compound semiconductor multijunction solar cell to be produced in high volume at reasonable cost and subject to manufacturing tolerances and variability inherent in the production processes, such an “optimum” design from an academic perspective is not necessarily the most desirable design in practice, and the teachings of such studies more likely than not point in the wrong direction and lead away from the proper design direction. Stated another way, such references may actually “teach away” from Applicant's research efforts and the ultimate solar cell design proposed by the Applicants.
Improvement in absorption efficiency is well known to be achieved by a tandem multijunction solar cell in which each subcell absorbs only a narrow energy band spectrum (or range of wavelengths). By connecting an optical series of subcells, each one with continuously decreasing energy gaps, the entire illumination energy will be converted into electricity. Since the subcells are also connected in an electrical series, current flows through each of the subcells, with the voltage associated with each subcell is determined by the material physical characteristics of each subcell.
In view of the foregoing, it is further evident that the identification or proportion of one particular constituent element (e.g. indium, or aluminum) in a particular subcell, or the thickness, band gap, doping, or other characteristic of the incorporation of that material in a particular subcell, is not a single, independent “result effective variable” that one skilled in the art can simply specify and incrementally adjust to a particular level and thereby increase the efficiency of a solar cell and its power output. The efficiency of a solar cell is not a simple linear algebraic equation as a function of the amount of gallium or aluminum or other element or material variable in a particular layer. The electrical characteristics of a semiconductor layer, such as the short circuit current (Jsc), the open circuit voltage (Voc) and the fill factor (FF), are affected by several factors as the number of subcells, the thickness of each subcell, the composition and doping of each active layer in a subcell. The consequential band structure, electron energy levels, conduction, and absorption of photons of different wavelengths and diffusion lengths in each subcell are not easily mathematically computable as a function of any one, two or small number of distinct single material variables. As an example, the power output may be stipulated to be a product of voltage and current in a subcell, but a simpleminded “result effective variable” approach to change a material variable (such as the amount of an element or doping in the layer), to thereby increase the voltage in a subcell in anticipation that it may result in greater power output, may in fact lead to a decrease in current, or a current mismatch between adjacent subcells in a tandem solar cell, or other interdependent effects (e.g., increased dopants diffusing into other layers and thereby adversely affecting them), with the overall effect of decreasing the power output of the solar cell.
The growth of each of the epitaxial layers of a solar cell in an MOCVD reactor is a non-equilibrium thermodynamic process with dynamically changing spatial and temporal boundary conditions that is not readily or predictably modeled. The formulation and solution of the relevant simultaneous partial differential equations covering such processes are not within the ambit of those of ordinary skill in the art in the field of solar cell design.
Even when it is known that particular variables have an impact on electrical, optical, chemical, thermal or other characteristics, the nature of the impact often cannot be predicted with much accuracy, particularly when the variables interact in complex ways, leading to unexpected results and unintended consequences. Thus, significant trial and error, which may include the fabrication and evaluative testing of many prototype devices, often over a period of time of months if not years, is required to determine whether a proposed structure with layers of particular compositions, actually will operate as intended, let alone whether it can be fabricated in a reproducible high volume manner within the manufacturing tolerances and variability inherent in the production process, and necessary for the design of a commercially viable device.
An illustration of the types of challenges faced by a designer of a photovoltaic power system for a space mission, identifying some of the specific issues faced with respect to the operating environment of the solar cells, a brief excerpt from a paper presented at the 37th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference in 2011 is presented herein.
The unique space mission described in that paper is the NASA Solar Probe Plus (“SPP”), which is a spacecraft planned for launching in July 2018 to travel in the region of the Sun's corona and withstand temperatures of up to 1370 degrees Centigrade. As described by NASA, the 1350 pound spacecraft with a photovoltaic power system producing over 200 watts, will travel between the Earth and the Sun, specifically between the maximum aphelion at 1.02 AU (or 219 Rs, where “R” is the value of the sun's radius) and the minimum perihelion at 9.5 Rs (or 3.7 million miles), where the solar irradiance levels will vary between 0.97× and 513×. Nevertheless, the requirements for minimum power production and maximum waste heat dissipation from the array remain more or less constant throughout the orbit. Although the present disclosure is not directed to the Solar Probe Plus solar cells, the design issues are illustrative and worthy of note.
The paper observes that, “Array-design modeling for SPP is an iterative process, due to the large number of interdependent unknowns. For example, the cell power conversion efficiency depends on the operating temperature, which in turn depends on the efficiency. The material choices for the array depend on the array operating conditions (most notably, temperature and solar irradiance levels) which in turn depend on the properties of the constituent array materials. And the array geometry (i.e., length/width of the primary and secondary arrays, and the angle between them) necessary to meet the power production requirements of the mission depends on the irradiance, which in turn depends on the array geometry—and so on.”
Furthermore, as in the case here, where multiple interdependent variables interact in unpredictable ways, the “discovery” of the proper choice of the combination of variables can produce new and unexpected results, and constitute an “inventive step”.
The exemplary solar cell described herein may require the use of aluminum in the semiconductor composition in the upper solar subcell, or in each of the top two subcells. For example, in some cases, the upper solar subcell may have an aluminum content in different embodiments, (i) in excess of 30% by mole fraction, or (ii) in excess of 25% by mole fraction, or (iii) in excess of 20% by mole fraction, or (iv) in excess of 17.5% by mole fraction. Likewise, in some cases, the second solar subcell adjacent to the upper solar subcell may have an aluminum content in excess of 25% by mole fraction, or (ii) in excess of 20% by mole fraction, or (iii) in excess of 17.5% by mole fraction.
Aluminum incorporation is widely known in the III-V compound semiconductor industry to degrade BOL subcell performance due to deep level donor defects, higher doping compensation, shorter minority carrier lifetimes, and lower cell voltage and an increased BOL Eg/q−Voc metric. In short, increased BOL Eg/q−Voc may be the most problematic shortcoming of aluminum containing subcells; the other limitations can be mitigated by modifying the doping schedule or thinning base thicknesses.
One aspect of the present disclosure relates generally to the use of substantial amounts of aluminum in the active layers of the upper subcells in a multijunction solar cell. The effects of increasing amounts of aluminum as a constituent element in an active layer of a subcell affects the photovoltaic device performance. One measure of the “quality” or “goodness” of a solar cell subcell or junction is the difference between the band gap of the semiconductor material in that subcell or junction and the Voc, or open circuit voltage, of that same junction. The smaller the difference, the higher the Voc of the solar cell junction relative to the band gap, and the better the performance of the device. Voc is very sensitive to semiconductor material quality, so the smaller the Eg/q−Voc of a device, the higher the quality of the material in that device. There is a theoretical limit to this difference, known as the Shockley-Queisser limit. That is the best that a solar cell junction can be under a given concentration of light at a given temperature.
Another way of characterizing the present disclosure is that in some embodiments of a four junction cell, aluminum is added to the top subcell in an amount of greater than 20% by mole fraction, and to the middle subcells, so that the resulting average band gap of all four subcells (i.e., the sum of the four band gaps of each subcell divided by four) is greater than 1.44 eV, or optionally 1.30 eV, or optionally 1.25 eV.
In some embodiments, another way of characterizing the present disclosure is that in some embodiments of a four junction solar cell, the average band gap of all four subcells (i.e., the sum of the four band gaps of each subcell divided by 4) is greater than 1.44 eV, and each subcell has a lattice constant of 5.653 Angstroms.
Some comments about MOCVD processes used in one embodiment are in order here.
It should be noted that the layers of a certain target composition in a semiconductor structure grown in an MOCVD process are inherently physically different than the layers of an identical target composition grown by another process, e.g. Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE). The material quality (i.e., morphology, stoichiometry, number and location of lattice traps, impurities, and other lattice defects) of an epitaxial layer in a semiconductor structure is different depending upon the process used to grow the layer, as well as the process parameters associated with the growth. MOCVD is inherently a chemical reaction process, while MBE is a physical deposition process. The chemicals used in the MOCVD process are present in the MOCVD reactor and interact with the wafers in the reactor, and affect the composition, doping, and other physical, optical and electrical characteristics of the material. For example, the precursor gases used in an MOCVD reactor (e.g. hydrogen) are incorporated into the resulting processed wafer material, and have certain identifiable electro-optical consequences which are more advantageous in certain specific applications of the semiconductor structure, such as in photoelectric conversion in structures designed as solar cells. Such high order effects of processing technology do result in relatively minute but actually observable differences in the material quality grown or deposited according to one process technique compared to another. Thus, devices fabricated at least in part using an MOCVD reactor or using a MOCVD process have inherent different physical material characteristics, which may have an advantageous effect over the identical target material deposited using alternative processes.
One aspect of the present disclosure relates to the use of aluminum in the active layers of the upper subcells in a multijunction solar cell. The effects of increasing amounts of aluminum as a constituent element in an active layer of a subcell affects the photovoltaic device performance. One measure of the “quality” or “goodness” of a solar cell junction is the difference between the band gap of the semiconductor material in that subcell or junction and the Voc, or open circuit voltage, of that same junction. The smaller the difference, the higher the Voc of the solar cell junction relative to the band gap, and the better the performance of the device. Voc is very sensitive to semiconductor material quality, so the smaller the Eg/q−Voc of a device, the higher the quality of the material in that device. There is a theoretical limit to this difference, known as the Shockley-Queisser limit. That is the best that a solar cell junction can be under a given concentration of light at a given temperature.
The experimental data obtained for single junction (Al)GaInP solar cells indicates that increasing the Al content of the junction leads to a larger Voc−Eg/q difference, indicating that the material quality of the junction decreases with increasing Al content.
As shown in the illustrated example of
Distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) layers 305 are then grown adjacent to and between the tunnel diode 303, 304 of the bottom subcell D and the third solar subcell C. The DBR layers 305 are arranged so that light can enter and pass through the third solar subcell C and at least a portion of which can be reflected back into the third solar subcell C by the DBR layers 305. In the embodiment depicted in
For some embodiments, distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) layers 305 can be composed of a plurality of alternating layers 305a through 305z of lattice matched materials with discontinuities in their respective indices of refraction. For certain embodiments, the difference in refractive indices between alternating layers is maximized in order to minimize the number of periods required to achieve a given reflectivity, and the thickness and refractive index of each period determines the stop band and its limiting wavelength.
For some embodiments, distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) layers 305a through 305z includes a first DBR layer composed of a plurality of p type AlxGa1-xAs layers, and a second DBR layer disposed over the first DBR layer and composed of a plurality of n or p type AlyGa1-yAs layers, where 0<x<1, 0<y<1, and y is greater than x.
In the illustrated example of
The window layer 309 is deposited on the emitter layer 308 of the subcell C. The window layer 309 in the subcell C also helps reduce the recombination loss and improves passivation of the cell surface of the underlying junctions. Before depositing the layers of the subcell B, heavily doped n-type InGaP and p-type AlGaAs (or other suitable compositions) tunneling junction layers 310, 311 may be deposited over the subcell C.
The middle subcell B includes a highly doped p-type aluminum gallium arsenide (“AlGaAs”) back surface field (“BSF”) layer 312, a p-type AlInGaAs base layer 313, a highly doped n-type indium gallium phosphide (“InGaP2”) or AlInGaAs emitter layer 314 and a highly doped n-type indium gallium aluminum phosphide (“AlGaAlP”) window layer 315. The InGaP emitter layer 314 of the subcell B can include, for example, approximately 50% In. Other compositions may be used as well.
In some embodiments, the middle subcell B may be composed of InGaAsO.
Before depositing the layers of the top cell A, heavily doped n-type InGaP and p-type AlGaAs tunneling junction layers 316, 317 may be deposited over the subcell B.
In the illustrated example, the top subcell A includes a highly doped p-type indium aluminum phosphide (“InAlP2”) BSF layer 318, a p-type InGaAIP base layer 319, a highly doped n-type InGaAlP emitter layer 320 and a highly doped n-type InAlP2 window layer 321. The base layer 319 of the top subcell A is deposited over the BSF layer 318 after the BSF layer 318 is formed.
After the cap or contact layer 322 is deposited, the grid lines are formed via evaporation and lithographically patterned and deposited over the cap or contact layer 322.
Turning to a second embodiment of the multijunction solar cell device of the present disclosure,
As shown in the illustrated example of
A first alpha layer 405, preferably composed of n-type AlGaInAsP, is deposited over the tunnel diode 403/404, to a thickness of from 0.25 to about 1.0 micron. Such an alpha layer is intended to prevent threading dislocations from propagating, either opposite to the direction of growth into the bottom subcell D, or in the direction of growth into the subcell C, and is more particularly described in U.S. Patent Application Pub. No. 2009/0078309 A1 (Comfeld et al.).
A metamorphic layer (or graded interlayer) 406 is deposited over the alpha layer 405 using a surfactant. Layer 406 is preferably a compositionally step-graded series of InGaAlAs layers, preferably with monotonically changing lattice constant, so as to achieve a gradual transition in lattice constant in the semiconductor structure from subcell D to subcell C while minimizing threading dislocations from occurring. The band gap of layer 406 is constant throughout its thickness, preferably approximately equal to 1.22 eV to 1.34 eV, or otherwise consistent with a value slightly greater than the band gap of the middle subcell C. One embodiment of the graded interlayer may also be expressed as being composed of InxGa1-xAs, with x and y selected such that the band gap of the interlayer remains constant at approximately 1.22 eV to 1.34 eV or other appropriate band gap.
In some embodiments, in the surfactant assisted growth of the metamorphic layer 406, a suitable chemical element is introduced into the reactor during the growth of layer 406 to improve the surface characteristics of the layer. In the preferred embodiment, such element may be a dopant or donor atom such as selenium (Se) or tellurium (Te). Small amounts of Se or Te are therefore incorporated in the metamorphic layer 406, and remain in the finished solar cell. Although Se or Te are the preferred n-type dopant atoms, other non-isoelectronic surfactants may be used as well.
Surfactant assisted growth results in a much smoother or planarized surface. Since the surface topography affects the bulk properties of the semiconductor material as it grows and the layer becomes thicker, the use of the surfactants minimizes threading dislocations in the active regions, and therefore improves overall solar cell efficiency.
As an alternative to the use of non-isoelectronic one may use an isoelectronic surfactant. The term “isoelectronic” refers to surfactants such as antimony (Sb) or bismuth (Bi), since such elements have the same number of valence electrons as the P atom of InGaP, or the As atom in InGaAlAs, in the metamorphic buffer layer. Such Sb or Bi surfactants will not typically be incorporated into the metamorphic layer 406.
In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the layer 406 is composed of a plurality of layers of InGaAs, with monotonically changing lattice constant, each layer having the same band gap, approximately in the range of 1.22 eV to 1.34 eV. In some embodiments, the constant band gap is in the range of 1.27 eV to 1.31 eV. In some embodiments, the constant band gap is in the range of 1.28 eV to 1.29 eV.
The advantage of utilizing a constant bandgap material such as InGaAs is that arsenide-based semiconductor material is much easier to process in standard commercial MOCVD reactors.
Although the preferred embodiment of the present disclosure utilizes a plurality of layers of InGaAs for the metamorphic layer 406 for reasons of manufacturability and radiation transparency, other embodiments of the present disclosure may utilize different material systems to achieve a change in lattice constant from subcell C to subcell D. Other embodiments of the present disclosure may utilize continuously graded, as opposed to step graded, materials. More generally, the graded interlayer may be composed of any of the As, P, N, Sb based III-V compound semiconductors subject to the constraints of having the in-plane lattice parameter greater than or equal to that of the second solar cell and less than or equal to that of the third solar cell, and having a bandgap energy greater than that of the second solar cell.
In some embodiments, a second alpha layer 407, preferably composed of n+ type GaInP, is deposited over metamorphic buffer layer 406, to a thickness of from 0.25 to about 1.0 micron. Such an alpha layer is intended to prevent threading dislocations from propagating, either opposite to the direction of growth into the subcell D, or in the direction of growth into the subcell C, and is more particularly described in U.S. Patent Application Pub. No. 2009/0078309 A1 (Comfeld et al.).
Distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) layers 408 are then grown adjacent to and between the alpha layer 407 and the third solar subcell C. The DBR layers 408 are arranged so that light can enter and pass through the third solar subcell C and at least a portion of which can be reflected back into the third solar subcell C by the DBR layers 408. In the embodiment depicted in
For some embodiments, distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) layers 408 can be composed of a plurality of alternating layers 408a through 408z of lattice matched materials with discontinuities in their respective indices of refraction. For certain embodiments, the difference in refractive indices between alternating layers is maximized in order to minimize the number of periods required to achieve a given reflectivity, and the thickness and refractive index of each period determines the stop band and its limiting wavelength.
For some embodiments, distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) layers 408a through 408z includes a first DBR layer composed of a plurality of p type AlxGa1-xAs layers, and a second DBR layer disposed over the first DBR layer and composed of a plurality of p type AlyGa1-yAs layers, where y is greater than x.
In the illustrated example of
The window layer 412 is deposited on the emitter layer 411 of the subcell C. The window layer 412 in the subcell C also helps reduce the recombination loss and improves passivation of the cell surface of the underlying junctions. Before depositing the layers of the subcell B, heavily doped n-type InGaP and p-type AlGaAs (or other suitable compositions) tunneling junction layers 413, 414 may be deposited over the subcell C.
The middle subcell B includes a highly doped p-type aluminum gallium arsenide (“AlGaAs”) back surface field (“BSF”) layer 415, a p-type AlInGaAs base layer 416, a highly doped n-type indium gallium phosphide (“InGaP2”) or AlInGaAs layer 417 and a highly doped n-type indium gallium aluminum phosphide (“AlGaAlP”) window layer 418. The InGaP emitter layer 417 of the subcell B can include, for example, approximately 50% In. Other compositions may be used as well.
Before depositing the layers of the top cell A, heavily doped n-type InGaP and p-type GaAs tunneling junction layers 419, 420 may be deposited over the subcell B.
In the illustrated example, the top subcell A includes a highly doped p-type indium aluminum phosphide (“InAlP”) BSF layer 421, a p-type InGaAlP base layer 422, a highly doped n-type InGaAlP emitter layer 423 and a highly doped n-type InAlP2 window layer 424. The base layer 422 of the top subcell A is deposited over the BSF layer 421 after the BSF layer 421 is formed over the tunneling junction layers 419, 420 of the subcell B. The window layer 424 is deposited over the emitter layer 423 of the top subcell A after the emitter layer 423 is formed over the base layer 422.
A cap or contact layer 425 may be deposited and patterned into separate contact regions over the window layer 424 of the top subcell A. The cap or contact layer 425 serves as an electrical contact from the top subcell A to metal grid layer (not shown). The doped cap or contact layer 425 can be a semiconductor layer such as, for example, a GaAs or InGaAs layer.
After the cap or contact layer 425 is deposited, the grid lines are formed via evaporation and lithographically patterned and deposited over the cap or contact layer 425.
The third embodiment depicted in
In some embodiments, at least the base of at least one of the first, second or third solar subcells has a graded doping, i.e., the level of doping varies from one surface to the other throughout the thickness of the base layer. In some embodiments, the gradation in doping is exponential. In some embodiments, the gradation in doping is incremental and monotonic.
In some embodiments, the emitter of at least one of the first, second or third solar subcells also has a graded doping, i.e., the level of doping varies from one surface to the other throughout the thickness of the emitter layer. In some embodiments, the gradation in doping is linear or monotonically decreasing.
As a specific example, the doping profile of the emitter and base layers may be illustrated in
In the example of
In the example of
The heavy lines 602 and 603 shown in
Thus, in one embodiment, the doping level throughout the thickness of the base layer may be exponentially graded from approximately 1×1016 free carriers per cubic centimeter to 1×1018 free carriers per cubic centimeter, as represented by the curve 603 depicted in the Figure.
Similarly, in one embodiment, the doping level throughout the thickness of the emitter layer may decline linearly from approximately 5×1018 free carriers per cubic centimeter to 5×1017 free carriers per cubic centimeter, as represented by the curve 602 depicted in the Figure
The absolute value of the collection field generated by an exponential doping gradient exp[−x/λ] is given by the constant electric field of magnitude E=kT/q(1/λ))(exp[−xb/λ]), where k is the Boltzman constant, T is the absolute temperature in degrees Kelvin, q is the absolute value of electronic charge, and λ is a parameter characteristic of the doping decay
The efficacy of an embodiment of the doping arrangement of the present disclosure has been demonstrated in a test solar cell which incorporated an exponential doping profile in the three micron thick base layer in a subcell of one embodiment of the disclosure
The exponential doping profile taught by one embodiment of the present disclosure produces a constant field in the doped region. In the particular multijunction solar cell materials and structure of the present disclosure, the bottom subcell has the smallest short circuit current among all the subcells. Since in a multijunction solar cell, the individual subcells are stacked and form a series electrical circuit, the total current flow in the entire solar cell is therefore limited by the smallest current produced in any of the subcells. Thus, by increasing the short circuit current in the bottom cell, the current more closely approximates that of the higher subcells, and the overall efficiency of the solar cell is increased as well. In a multijunction solar cell with approximately efficiency, the implementation of the present doping arrangement would thereby increase efficiency. In addition to an increase in efficiency, the collection field created by the exponential doping profile will enhance the radiation hardness of the solar cell, which is important for spacecraft applications.
Although the exponentially doped profile is the doping design which has been implemented and verified, other doping profiles may give rise to a linear varying collection field which may offer yet other advantages. For example, another doping profile may produce a linear field in the doped region which would be advantageous for both minority carrier collection and for radiation hardness at the end-of-life (EOL) of the solar cell. Such other doping profiles in one or more base layers are within the scope of the present disclosure.
The doping profile depicted herein are merely illustrative, and other more complex profiles may be utilized as would be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention
The present disclosure provides a multijunction solar cell that follows a design rule that one should incorporate as many high band gap subcells as possible to achieve the goal to increase the efficiency at high temperature EOL. For example, high band gap subcells may retain a greater percentage of cell voltage as temperature increases, thereby offering lower power loss as temperature increases. As a result, both HT-BOL and HT-EOL performance of the exemplary multijunction solar cell, according to the present disclosure, may be expected to be greater than traditional cells.
The wide range of electron and proton energies present in the space environment necessitates a method of describing the effects of various types of radiation in terms of a radiation environment which can be produced under laboratory conditions. The methods for estimating solar cell degradation in space are based on the techniques described by Brown et al. [Brown, W. L., J. D. Gabbe, and W. Rosenzweig, Results of the Telstar Radiation Experiments, Bell System Technical J., 42, 1505, 1963] and Tada [Tada, H. Y., J. R. Carter, Jr., B. E. Anspaugh, and R. G. Downing, Solar Cell Radiation Handbook, Third Edition, JPL Publication 82-69, 1982]. In summary, the omnidirectional space radiation is converted to a damage equivalent unidirectional fluence at a normalized energy and in terms of a specific radiation particle. This equivalent fluence will produce the same damage as that produced by omnidirectional space radiation considered when the relative damage coefficient (RDC) is properly defined to allow the conversion. The relative damage coefficients (RDCs) of a particular solar cell structure are measured a priori under many energy and fluence levels in addition to different cover glass thickness values. When the equivalent thence is determined for a given space environment, the parameter degradation can be evaluated in the laboratory by irradiating the solar cell with the calculated fluence level of unidirectional normally incident flux. The equivalent fluence is normally expressed in terms of 1 MeV electrons or 10 MeV protons.
The software package Spenvis (www.spenvis.oma.be) is used to calculate the specific electron and proton fluence that a solar cell is exposed to during a specific satellite mission as defined by the duration, altitude, azimuth, etc. Spenvis employs the EQFLUX program, developed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) to calculate 1 MeV and 10 MeV damage equivalent electron and proton fluences, respectively, for exposure to the fluences predicted by the trapped radiation and solar proton models for specified mission environment duration. The conversion to damage equivalent fluences is based on the relative damage coefficients determined for multijunction cells [Marvin, D. C., Assessment of Multijunction Solar Cell Performance in Radiation Environments, Aerospace Report No. TOR-2000 (1210)-1,2000]. A widely accepted total mission equivalent fluence for a geosynchronous satellite mission of 15 year duration is 1 MeV 1×1015 electrons/cm2.
The exemplary solar cell described herein may require the use of aluminum in the semiconductor composition of each of the top two subcells. Aluminum incorporation is widely known in the III-V compound semiconductor industry to degrade BOL subcell performance due to deep level donor defects, higher doping compensation, shorter minority carrier lifetimes, and lower cell voltage and an increased BOL Eg/q−Voc metric. In short, increased BOL Eg/q−Voc may be the most problematic shortcoming of aluminum containing subcells; the other limitations can be mitigated by modifying the doping schedule or thinning base thicknesses.
In view of different satellite and space vehicle requirements in terms of operating environmental temperature, radiation exposure, and operational life, a range of subcell designs using the design principles of the present disclosure may be provided satisfying specific defined customer and mission requirements, and several illustrative embodiments are set forth hereunder, along with the computation of their efficiency at the end-of-life for comparison purposes. As described in greater detail below, solar cell performance after radiation exposure is experimentally measured using 1 MeV electron fluence per square centimeter (abbreviated in the text that follows as e/cm2), so that a comparison can be made between the current commercial devices and embodiments of solar cells discussed in the present disclosure.
As an example of different mission requirements, a low earth orbit (LEO) satellite will typically experience radiation of protons equivalent to an electron fluence per square centimeter in the range of 1×1012 e/cm2 to 2×1014 e/cm2 (hereinafter may be written as “2E10 e/cm2 or 2E14”) over a five year lifetime. A geosynchronous earth orbit (GEO) satellite will typically experience radiation in the range of 5×1014 e/cm2 to 1×1015 e/cm2 over a fifteen year lifetime.
As a baseline comparison, the cell efficiency (%) measured at room temperature (RT) 28° C. and high temperature (HT) 70° C., at beginning of life (BOL) and end of life (EOL), for a standard three junction commercial solar cell (the ZTJ of SolAero Technologies Corp., of Albuquerque, N.M.), is as follows:
The Jsc of the upper two subcells at EOL under 1E15 conditions is 17.2 mA, and the ratio of the upper junction Jsc to the bottom subcell Jsc is 139%.
The simplest manner to express the different embodiments of the present disclosure and their efficiency compared to that of the standard solar cell noted above is to list the embodiments with the specification of the composition of each successive subcell and their respective band gap, and then the computed efficiency.
Thus, for a four junction solar cell configured and described in the parent application and the present disclosure, four embodiments and their corresponding efficiency data at the end-of-life (EOL) is as follows:
For a five junction solar cell configured and described in the parent application and the present disclosure, some embodiments and corresponding efficiency data at the end-of-life (EOL) computed at 28° C. is as follows:
The four junction solar cell of the present disclosure has a higher cell efficiency than the standard commercial solar cell (ZTJ) at BOL at 70° C. However, the solar cell in some embodiments described in the present disclosure exhibits substantially improved cell efficiency (%) over the standard commercial solar cell (ZTJ) at 1 MeV electron equivalent fluence of 5×1014 e/cm2, and dramatically improved cell efficiency (%) over the standard commercial solar cell (ZTJ) at 1 MeV electron equivalent fluence of 1×1015 e/cm2.
The wide range of electron and proton energies present in the space environment necessitates a method of describing the effects of various types of radiation in terms of a radiation environment which can be produced under laboratory conditions. The methods for estimating solar cell degradation in space are based on the techniques described by Brown et al. [Brown, W. L., J. D. Gabbe, and W. Rosenzweig, Results of the Telstar Radiation Experiments, Bell System Technical J., 42, 1505, 1963] and Tada [Tada, H. Y., J. R. Carter, Jr., B. E. Anspaugh, and R. G. Downing, Solar Cell Radiation Handbook, Third Edition, JPL Publication 82-69, 1982]. In summary, the omnidirectional space radiation is converted to a damage equivalent unidirectional fluence at a normalised energy and in terms of a specific radiation particle. This equivalent fluence will produce the same damage as that produced by omnidirectional space radiation considered when the relative damage coefficient (RDC) is properly defined to allow the conversion. The relative damage coefficients (RDCs) of a particular solar cell structure are measured a priori under many energy and fluence levels in addition to different coverglass thickness values. When the equivalent fluence is determined for a given space environment, the parameter degradation can be evaluated in the laboratory by irradiating the solar cell with the calculated fluence level of unidirectional normally incident flux. The equivalent fluence is normally expressed in terms of 1 MeV electrons or 10 MeV protons.
It will be understood that each of the elements described above, or two or more together, also may find a useful application in other types of structures or constructions differing from the types of structures or constructions described above.
The terms “substantially”, “essentially”, “approximately”, “about”, or any other similar expression relating to particular parametric numerical value are defined as being close to that value as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art in the context of that parameter, and in one non-limiting embodiment the term is defined to be within 10% of that value, in another embodiment within 5% of that value, in another embodiment within 1% of that value, and in another embodiment within 0.5% of that value.
The terminology used in this disclosure is for the purpose of describing specific identified embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of different examples or embodiments.
The term “coupled” as used herein is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly or physically adjoining, and not necessarily structurally or mechanically. A device or structure that is “configured” in a certain way is arranged or configured in at least that described way, but may also be arranged or configured in ways that are not described or depicted.
It is to be noted that the terms “front”, “back”, “side”, “top”, “bottom”, “over”, “on”, “above”, “beneath”, “below”, “under”, and the like in the description and the claims, if any, are used for descriptive purposes and not necessarily for describing permanent relative positions. It is understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the disclosure described herein are, for example, capable of operation in other orientations than those illustrated or otherwise described herein. For example, if the assembly in the figures is inverted or turned over, elements of the assembly described as “below” or “beneath” other elements or features would then be oriented “above” the other elements or features. Thus, the exemplary term “below” can encompass both an orientation of above and below. The assembly may be otherwise oriented (rotated by a number of degrees through an axis).
In the drawings, the position, relative distance, lengths, widths, and thicknesses of supports, substrates, layers, regions, films, etc., may be exaggerated for presentation simplicity or clarity. Like reference numerals designate like elements throughout the specification. It will be understood that when an element such as an element layer, film, region, or feature is referred to as being “on” another element, it can be disposed directly on the other element or the presence of intervening elements may also be possible. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being disposed “directly on” another element, there are no intervening elements present.
Furthermore, those skilled in the art will recognize that boundaries and spacings between the above described units/operations are merely illustrative. The multiple units/operations may be combined into a single unit/operation, a single unit/operation may be distributed in additional units/operations, and units/operations may be operated at least partially overlapping in time. Moreover, alternative embodiments may include multiple instances of a particular unit/operation, and the order of operations may be altered in various other embodiments.
The terms “front side” and “backside” refer to the final arrangement of the panel, integrated cell structure or of the individual solar cells with respect to the illumination or incoming light incidence.
In the claims, the word ‘comprising’ or ‘having’ does not exclude the presence of other elements or steps than those listed in a claim. It is understood that the terms “comprise”, “comprising”, “includes”, and “including” if used herein, specify the presence of stated components, elements, features, steps, or operations, components but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other components, elements, features, steps, or operations, or combinations and permutations thereof.
The terms “a” or “an”, as used herein., are defined as one or more than one. Also, the use of introductory phrases such as “at least one” and “one or more” in the claims should be construed to imply that the introduction of another claim element by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim element to disclosures containing only one such element, even when the claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an”. The same holds true for the use of definite articles.
Unless stated otherwise, terms such as “first” and “second” are used to arbitrarily distinguish between the elements such terms describe. Thus, these terms are not necessarily intended to indicate temporal or other prioritization of such elements. The fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage. It will be understood that, although the team “first”, “second”, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, devices, components, regions, layers, areas, and/or sections, these elements, devices, components, regions, layers, areas, and/or sections should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one device, element, component, region, layer, area, or section from another device, element, component, region, layer area or section. Thus, a first device, element, component, region, layer, area, or section discussed below could be termed a second device, element, component, region, layer, area or section without departing from the teachings of example embodiments
The present disclosure can be embodied in various ways. To the extent a sequence of steps are described, the above described orders of the steps for the methods are only intended to be illustrative, and the steps of the methods of the present disclosure are not limited to the above specifically described orders unless otherwise specifically stated. Note that the embodiments of the present disclosure can be freely combined with each other without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
Although some specific embodiments of the present disclosure have been demonstrated in detail with examples, it should be understood by a person skilled in the art that the above examples are only intended to be illustrative but not to limit the scope and spirit of the present disclosure. The above embodiments can be modified without departing from the scope and spirit of the present disclosure which are to be defined by the attached claims. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the claims.
Although described embodiments of the present disclosure utilizes a vertical stack of a certain illustrated number of subcells, various aspects and features of the present disclosure can apply to stacks with fewer or greater number of subcells, i.e. two junction cells, three junction cells, four, five, six, seven junction cells, etc.
In addition, although the disclosed embodiments are configured with top and bottom electrical contacts, the subcells may alternatively be contacted by means of metal contacts to laterally conductive semiconductor layers between the subcells. Such arrangements may be used to form 3-terminal, 4-terminal, and in general, n-terminal devices. The subcells can be interconnected in circuits using these additional terminals these additional terminals such that most of the available photogenerated current density in each subcell can be used effectively, leading to high efficiency for the multijunction cell, notwithstanding that the photogenerated current densities are typically different in the various subcells.
As noted above, the solar cell described in the present disclosure may utilize an arrangement of one or more, or all, homojunction cells or subcells, i.e., a cell or subcell in which the p-n junction is formed between a p-type semiconductor and an n-type semiconductor both of which have the same chemical composition and the same band gap, differing only in the dopant species and types, and one or more heterojunction cells or subcells. Subcell C, with p-type and n-type InGaAs is one example of a homojunction subcell.
In some cells, a thin so-called “intrinsic layer” may be placed between the emitter layer and base layer, with the same or different composition from either the emitter or the base layer. The intrinsic layer may function to suppress minority-carrier recombination in the space-charge region. Similarly, either the base layer or emitter layer may also be intrinsic or not-intentionally-doped (“NID”) over part or all of its thickness.
The composition of the window or BSF layers may utilize other semiconductor compounds, subject to lattice constant and band gap requirements, and may include AlInP, AlAs, AlP, AlGaInP, AlGaAsP, AlGaInAs, AlGaInPAs, GaInP, GaINaS, GaInPAs, AlGaAs, AlInAs, AlInPAs, GaAsSb, GaAsSb, AlInSb, GaInSb, AlGaInSb, AlN, GaN, InN, GaInN, AlGaInN, GaInNAs, AlGaInNAs, ZnSSe, CdSSe, and similar materials, and still fall within the spirit of the present invention.
While the solar cell described in the present disclosure has been illustrated and described as embodied in a conventional multijunction solar cell, it is not intended to be limited to the details shown, since it is also applicable to inverted metamorphic solar cells, and various modifications and structural changes may be made without departing in any way from the spirit of the present disclosure.
Thus, while the description of the semiconductor device described in the present disclosure has focused primarily on solar cells or photovoltaic devices, persons skilled in the art know that other optoelectronic devices, such as thermophotovoltaic (TPV) cells, photodetectors and light-emitting diodes (LEDS), are very similar in structure, physics, and materials to photovoltaic devices with some minor variations in doping and the minority carrier lifetime. For example, photodetectors can be the same materials and structures as the photovoltaic devices described above, but perhaps more lightly-doped for sensitivity rather than power production. On the other band, LEDs can also be made with similar structures and materials, but perhaps more heavily-doped to shorten recombination time, thus radiative lifetime to produce light instead of power. Therefore, this invention also applies to photodetectors and LEDs with structures, compositions of matter, articles of manufacture, and improvements as described above for photovoltaic cells.
Without further analysis, from the forgoing others can, by applying current knowledge, readily adapt the present for various applications. Such adaptions should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalence of the following claims.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/180,210 filed Feb. 19, 2021, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/722,732 filed Dec. 20, 2019, now U.S. patent Ser. No. 11/211,511, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/681,144 filed Aug. 18, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10/700,230. The present application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/736,662 filed Jan. 7, 2020. The present application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/203,975 filed Jul. 7, 2016, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/858,206 filed Aug. 17, 2015. The present application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/543,937 filed Dec. 7, 2021, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/203,975. This application is also related to and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/210,532 filed Jul. 14, 2016, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/873,135 filed Jan. 17, 2018, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/504,828 filed Jul. 8, 2019. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/660,092 filed Mar. 17, 2015, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/716,814 filed Mar. 3, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,018,521; which was a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/337,043 filed Dec. 17, 2008. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/872,663 filed Apr. 29, 2012 now U.S. Pat. No. 10,541,349 which was a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/337,043, filed Dec. 17, 2008. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 14/828,197 and 14/828,206 filed Aug. 17, 2015. All of the above related applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15681144 | Aug 2017 | US |
| Child | 16722732 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17180210 | Feb 2021 | US |
| Child | 17682171 | US | |
| Parent | 16722732 | Dec 2019 | US |
| Child | 17180210 | US | |
| Parent | 16736662 | Jan 2020 | US |
| Child | 15681144 | US |
