The hydrocarbon exploration and recovery industry is forced with growing demand worldwide and therefore faced with the ever-increasing need for greater efficiency in completing boreholes for production both from cost and rapidity standpoints. In an effort to continue to raise the bar that represents these interests, inventors are constantly seeking out new ways to improve the process. While many improvements have been made and successfully implemented over the years, further improved procedures, configurations, etc. are still needed. In the downhole environment directly, multilateral wellbore construction and completion has become increasingly ubiquitous in recent years. Multilateral wellbores allow for a greater return on investment associated with drilling and completing a wellbore simply because more discrete areas/volumes of a subterranean hydrocarbon deposit (or deposits) is/are reachable through a single well. Moreover, such multilateral wellbore systems have a smaller footprint at the earths surface, reducing environmental concerns. Multilateral wellbores generally require “junctions” at intersection points where lateral boreholes meet a primary borehole or where lateral boreholes (acting then as sub primary boreholes) meet other lateral boreholes. “Junctions” as is familiar to one of skill in the art are “Y” type constructions utilized to create sealed flow paths at borehole intersections and are generally referred to as having a “primary leg” and a “lateral leg”.
There is a need in the industry for the flow of fluids at a multilateral intersection to be isolated from the formation. This is commonly known as a sealed junction. There are currently a number of ways of achieving this. For a given main well bore size two tubing strings can be run, one to the main bore and one to the lateral. If larger tubing strings are required then either a larger main bore is required or at least one of the tubing strings must be shaped prior to installation. An alternate to these is to construct the sealed junction downhole at the intersection of the main bore and lateral. Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages. By utilizing two small tubes the junction can withstand high pressure differentials, but forgoes flow area and hence production rate. A large main bore and large tubing strings gains flow area and rate with moderate to high pressure ratings, but the increased sizes can have a major financial impact on numerous other related equipment in the overall well system. Junction systems where the tubing strings are not round end up with increases in flow area and rate over the small tubing strings, but are inherently lower in pressure and load rating. Systems where the sealing mechanism is assembled down hole have so far been complex to manufacture and install, with minimal increase in flow area, and with pressure ratings approximately equal to the non-round versions.
Since ease of installation, sealing and high overall strength characteristics are always a high priority, improved junction systems are always well received by the relevant art.
Disclosed herein is a wellbore junction. The junction includes a discrete primary leg and a discrete lateral leg connected to the primary leg, at least one of the legs comprising a plurality of flow passageways.
Further enclosed herein is a wellbore system. The system includes a junction having a discrete primary leg and a discrete lateral leg connected to the primary leg, at least one of the legs comprising a plurality of flow passageways, the junction disposed at an intersection between a primary borehole and a lateral borehole.
Yet further disclosed herein is a method for installing a junction in a wellbore. The method includes running a junction having a discrete primary leg and a discrete lateral leg connected to the primary leg at least one of the legs comprising a plurality of flow passageways. The method further includes landing the junction at an intersection between a primary borehole and a lateral borehole and causing the lateral leg to enter the lateral borehole and causing the lateral leg to enter the lateral borehole.
Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several Figures:
At an intersection 16 between primary borehole 12 and lateral borehole 14, there is illustrated a hook hanger liner hanger 18. This system is commercially available from Baker Oil Tools, Houston, Texas. As such, the hanger 18 does not require a detailed description of its structure and operation. At an uphole end of hanger 18 is an orientation profile 20 configured to provide a clear indication as to an angular location of the lateral borehole 14. The hanger 18 is installed in the wellbore prior to running the junction, in accordance with well-established procedures.
In a subsequent run in the wellbore 10, junction and sleeve assembly 22 (which comprises an external orientation sleeve 26 and a junction 34, both more formally introduced hereunder) (see
Once the external orientation sleeve 26 is seated at hanger 18, sleeve 26 no longer moves downhole. Further, weight from uphole on the assembly causes a collet 30 to disengage from the initial collet profile 32, (see
Upon stroking of junction 34, a primary leg 38 (see
Focusing on junction 34, and as is ascertainable from the foregoing explanation; the junction comprises primary leg 38 and lateral leg 28. These are joined together at a more uphole portion of junction 34, identified as body 52. Body 52 is tubular in structure and houses the primary leg flow in an axial flow area of a sliding sleeve 54 as well as an annular flow comprising fluid from lateral bore leg 28. The annular flow is defined by the sliding sleeve 54 and the inside of body 52. If the sliding sleeve 54 is in an open position (choked or full open) then fluid from the lateral borehole 14 will flow into the sliding sleeve, and flow with the fluid from the primary borehole 12. Alternately, if the sliding sleeve is positioned to prevent flow (closed) then the fluid from lateral borehole 14 is prevented from moving uphole. It should be appreciated that it is also possible to flow only the lateral borehole 14 in this arrangement by opening the sliding sleeve 54 and running a plug downhole of the sliding sleeve 54 to shut off the primary bore.
One feature of the junction 34 directly addresses one of the short comings of the prior art in that a significant flow area is obtained for the junction 34 while maintaining cylindrical seal surfaces and cylindrical flow areas. This is accomplished in one embodiment as is illustrated in
While the drawing
While preferred embodiments have been shown and described, modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustration and not limitation.
This application claims the benefit of an earlier filing date from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No.: 60/647,207 filed Jan. 26, 2005, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2242378 | Vollbach et al. | May 1941 | A |
4489782 | Perkins | Dec 1984 | A |
5439051 | Kennedy et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5472048 | Kennedy et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
6015012 | Reddick | Jan 2000 | A |
6315054 | Brunet | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6349769 | Ohmer | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354375 | Dewey | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6390198 | Brooks et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6561277 | Algeroy et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6561279 | MacKenzie et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6568469 | Ohmer et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6729410 | Steele | May 2004 | B2 |
6732802 | Smith | May 2004 | B2 |
6789628 | Hess et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802371 | Collins et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6840321 | Restarick et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6863129 | Ohmer et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6915847 | Brockman | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7100693 | Collins et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7104324 | Wetzel et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7104332 | Murray et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7207383 | Hurst et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7231980 | Murray et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7273109 | Moore et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
20050039915 | Murray | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050061511 | Steele | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060000614 | Restarick et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060180316 | Steele et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060201677 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60647207 | Jan 2005 | US |