MULTILAYER AND SINGLE LAYER CELLULOSE ESTER FILMS HAVING REVERSED OPTICAL DISPERSION

Abstract
The present invention relates to a single layer mixed cellulose ester film having a reversed optical dispersion. The mixed cellulose ester material has a DSOH from 0.35 to 1.35. By manipulating the thickness of the film, and the film stretching conditions, desirable optical retardation and optical dispersion properties can be obtained. The film can be used as an optical waveplate in liquid crystal displays to improve viewing angle, contrast ratio, and color shift.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to cellulose ester films. In particular, the invention relates to multilayer cellulose ester films having reversed optical dispersion. The invention also relates to single layer cellulose ester films having reversed optical dispersion. The films are particularly suitable for use as an optical waveplate in liquid crystal displays.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

An optical waveplate (also known as an optical retarder) is one of the key optical components to control the polarization state of polarized light. It has been widely used in different kinds of polarizing optical systems, such as optical imaging, fiber optical telecommunication, wave front correction, polarization controller, and liquid crystal displays (LCDs). Two important characteristics of a waveplate are its optical retardation and optical dispersion. A waveplate can have a strong or weak optical retardation value as well as a normal, flat, or reversed optical dispersion.



FIG. 1 shows a waveplate 3 sandwiched between two crossed polarizers 1 and 2. For normal incident light, the transmission T (output light) depends on following relationship:






T∝ sin2 2β sin2 [πΔnd/λ0]  (1)


where d is the waveplate thickness; Δn=nx−ny where nx and ny are the refractive indices of the waveplate in x and y directions (in-plane); β is the angle between the waveplate optical axis (i.e., the nx axis) and the polarizer 1 transmission axis; and λ0 is the wavelength in free space of the input light. The transmission axis of the polarizer 1 is in the horizontal direction, while the transmission axis of the polarizer 2 is in the vertical direction. The input light can be polarized or non-polarized. The output light T is always polarized and its transmission depends on two terms: (i) sin2 2β; and (ii) sin2(πΔnd/λ0).


If the second term has a constant value, T only depends on the orientation of the waveplate. When β=0° or 90°, T is minimum; when β=45°, T is maximum. On the other hand, if the first term has a constant value, such as 1.0, which corresponds to β=45°, T only depends on Δnd/λ0. The term Δnd is defined as the waveplate in-plane retardation, Re:






R
e
=Δnd=(nx−ny)d  (2)


Therefore, for normal incident light, the transmission T depends on Re0. The related out-of-plane retardation Rth is defined as:










R
th

=


[


n
z

-


(


n
x

+

n
y


)

2


]


d





(
3
)







where nz is the waveplate refractive index in the z direction (out-of-plane).


If the incident light contains multiple wavelengths, to achieve the same transmission for all wavelengths, such as red (R), green (G), and blue (B) light, Re0 must be a constant. For example, Re(R)/λ0(R)=Re(G)/λ0(G)=Re(B)/λ0(B)=¼, which is termed as an achromatic or a broadband quarter waveplate. FIG. 2 shows an ideal achromatic quarter waveplate plot between Re and λ.


If Re of a waveplate decreases as the wavelength λ increases, this waveplate has normal optical dispersion. Most polymers such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polycarbonate, and polystyrene, exhibit this kind of dispersion. If Re of a waveplate increases as the wavelength λ increases, this waveplate has reversed optical dispersion.



FIG. 2 indicates that an ideal achromatic waveplate should have reversed optical dispersion. In reality, this is very difficult to achieve (cf. Masayuki Yamaguchi et al., Macromolecules 2009, 42, 9034-9040; Akihiko Uchiyama et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 42 (2003) 3503-3507; Akihiko Uchiyama et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 42 (2003) 6941-6945). To improve the image quality of LCDs, controlling the optical dispersion of a waveplate plays an important role and a waveplate exhibiting reversed optical dispersion is highly desirable. Furthermore, considering the complexity of a typical LCD and dispersions of the other layers, a waveplate often needs to have optimized optical dispersion properties.


A useful way to quantify optical dispersion is by the parameters ARe, BRe, ARth and BRth:






A
Re
=R
e(450)/Re(550)  (4)





BRe=Re(650)/Re(550)  (5)






A
Rth
=R
th(450)/Rth(550)  (6)





BRth=Rth(650)/Rth(550)  (7)


where 450, 550, and 650 in the parentheses are the wavelength in nanometers. For an ideal achromatic waveplate, ARe=ARth=0.818, and BRe=BRth=1.182, and the dispersion curve is a linear straight line as shown in FIG. 2. If a waveplate has non-ideal reversed dispersion, ARe and ARth have to be less than 1.0, and BRe and BRth have to be greater than 1.0. In reality, most materials with reversed dispersion do not have linear relation. If ARe, ARth, BRe and BRth are all equal to 1.0, the waveplate has flat dispersion. If ARe and ARth is greater than 1.0, and BRe and BRth is less than 1.0, the waveplate has normal dispersion.


Unlike most other polymers, waveplates made from cellulose esters such as cellulose acetate (CA), cellulose acetate propionate (CAP), and cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB), often have reversed optical dispersions because of their polymer chain conformation and chemical compositions. But the values of ARe, BRe, ARth and BRth also depend on other factors such as plasticizers, additives, and processing conditions for making the waveplate. Also, cellulose esters with very low hydroxyl level could exhibit normal optical dispersions.


In some LCD applications, waveplates with higher optical retardation and more reversed dispersion are desired, where ARe, BRe, ARth and BRth are close to an ideal achromatic waveplate. However, our studies have found that, typically, there is a tradeoff between having a higher optical retardation and more reversed dispersion. In general, we have found that when a waveplate has higher optical retardation values, the waveplate often exhibits relatively flat dispersion curves. On the other hand, when the waveplate exhibits a more reversed dispersion, the retardation is relatively low and cannot meet some requirements for certain applications. As an illustration, FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b) show the in-plane and out-of-plane optical dispersion curves of two types of cellulose esters (CEs). CE1, which has a low optical retardation (Re(550)CE1=31.35 nm and Rth(550)CE1=−60.32 nm), has a more reversed optical dispersion than CE2. CE2, which has a high optical retardation (Re(550)CE2=88.40 nm and Rth(550)CE2=−211.20 nm), has a more flat optical dispersion relative to CE1.


Thus, there is a need in the art for an optical waveplate that has both high optical retardation and more reversed optical dispersion at the same time. The present invention addresses this need as well as others that will become apparent from the following description and claims.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It has been surprisingly discovered that waveplates with both high optical retardation and reversed dispersion can be obtained. Such waveplates are composed of multiple layers of cellulose ester film. The cellulose ester materials for layer A should have low hydroxyl content, while the cellulose ester materials for layer B should have high hydroxyl content. By varying the thickness of layers A and B, and the film stretching conditions, films with the desired optical retardations and optical dispersions can be obtained.


In one aspect, the invention provides a multilayer film having reversed optical dispersion. The film comprises:


(a) a layer (A) comprising cellulose ester having a degree of substitution of hydroxyl groups (DSOH) of 0 to 0.5; and


(b) a layer (B) comprising cellulose ester having a DSOH of 0.5 to 1.3, provided that when the DSOH of layer (A) and layer (B) are both 0.5, the cellulose ester of layer (A) is different from the cellulose ester of layer (B).


In a second aspect, the invention provides an optical waveplate for a liquid crystal display. The waveplate has reversed optical dispersion and comprises the multilayer film as described herein.


In a third aspect, the invention provides a liquid crystal display. The display comprises an optical waveplate as described herein.


In one aspect, the invention provides an optical waveplate comprising a single layer film with reversed optical dispersions comprised of cellulose ester film have a Re from about 55 to 400 nm and a Rth from about −40 to −400 nm.


In one aspect, the invention provides an optical waveplate comprising a single layer film comprising a cellulose ester with a total DS from about 1.65 to about 2.65, or DSOH from 0.35 to 1.35.


In one aspect, the invention provides an optical waveplate comprising a single layer film comprising cellulose esters that are randomly substituted copolymers having a total DS from about 1.65 to about 2.65.


In one aspect, the invention provides an optical waveplate comprising a film comprising a cellulose ester film that is annealed and uniaxially or biaxially stretched and has reverse optical dispersion.


In another aspect of this invention, the cellulose ester film after uniaxial or biaxial stretching has Re(589) from about 55 nm to 400 nm, Rth(589) from about −40 nm to −400 nm, ARe and ARth are from about 0.85 to 1.0, BRe and BRth are from about 1.0 to 1.15.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an illustration of an optical waveplate sandwiched between two crossed polarizers.



FIG. 2 is an ideal achromatic quarter waveplate optical dispersion graph.



FIG. 3(
a) is an in-plane optical dispersion graph of two different cellulose ester films.



FIG. 3(
b) is an out-of-plane optical dispersion graph of two different cellulose ester films.



FIG. 4(
a) shows a multilayer film according to the invention in an A-B configuration.



FIG. 4(
b) shows a multilayer film according to the invention in an A-B-A configuration.



FIG. 5 shows the structure of a broadband quarter waveplate according to the prior art.



FIG. 6 is an ideal achromatic quarter and half waveplate optical dispersion graph.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a multilayer film having reversed optical dispersion. The film comprises:


(a) a layer (A) comprising cellulose ester having a degree of substitution of hydroxyl groups (DSOH) of 0 to 0.5; and


(b) a layer (B) comprising cellulose ester having a DSOH of 0.5 to 1.3, provided that when the DSOH of layer (A) and layer (B) are both 0.5, the cellulose ester of layer (A) is different from the cellulose ester of layer (B).


The cellulose esters making up the individual layers (A) and (B) may be randomly or regioselectively substituted. Regioselectivity can be measured by determining the relative degree of substitution (RDS) at C6, C3, and C2 in the cellulose ester by carbon 13 NMR (Macromolecules, 1991, 24, 3050-3059). In the case of one acyl substituent or when a second acyl substituent is present in a minor amount (DS<0.2), the RDS can be most easily determined directly by integration of the ring carbons. When 2 or more acyl substituents are present in similar amounts, in addition to determining the ring RDS, it is sometimes necessary to fully substitute the cellulose ester with an additional substituent in order to independently determine the RDS of each substituent by integration of the carbonyl carbons. In conventional cellulose esters, regioselectivity is generally not observed and the RDS ratio of C6/C3, C6/C2, or C3/C2 is generally near 1 or less. In essence, conventional cellulose esters are random copolymers. In contrast, when adding one or more acylating reagents to cellulose dissolved in an appropriate solvent, the C6 position of cellulose are acylated much faster than C2 and C3. Consequentially, the C6/C3 and C6/C2 ratios are significantly greater than 1, which is characteristic of a 6,3- or 6,2-enhanced regioselectively substituted cellulose ester.


The cellulose esters useful in the present invention can be prepared by any known means for preparing cellulose esters.


Examples of randomly substituted cellulose esters having a DSOH from about 0.0 to about 0.5 useful for layer A are described in US 2009/0054638 and US 2009/0050842; the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference with the exception of blends of two or more cellulose esters.


The cellulose esters of US 2009/0054638 and US 2009/0050842 are mixed esters, based for example, on acetyl, propionyl, and/or butyryl, but longer chain acids can also be used. Mixed esters can provide adequate solubility for processing and reduce gel formation. The non-acetyl degree of substitution is termed as DSNAC. The propionyl/butyryl degree of substitution (DS(PR+Bu)) is a subgenus of DSNAC, and refers to the non-acetyl degree of substitution wherein the non-acetyl groups are propionyl and/or butyryl groups. In one embodiment, acetyl is the primary ester forming group. In another embodiment, the cellulose ester is a cellulose acetate propionate (CAP) ester. In another embodiment, the cellulose ester is a cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB) ester. In another embodiment, the cellulose ester is a cellulose acetate propionate butyrate (CAPB) ester. In another embodiment, the cellulose ester is a mixed cellulose ester of acetate and comprises at least one ester residue of an acid chain having more than 4 carbon atoms, such as, for example, pentonoyl or hexanoyl. Such higher acid chain ester residues may include, but are not limited to, for example acid chains esters with 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 carbon atoms. They may also include acid chains esters with more than 12 carbon atoms. In another embodiment, the mixed cellulose acetate ester that comprises at least one ester residue of an acid chain having more than 4 carbon atoms may also comprise propionyl and/or butyryl groups.


In one embodiment, the mixed ester system has a total degree of substitution of from 2.8 to 3 (i.e., the hydroxyl DS is between 0 and 0.2). In another embodiment, the total degree of substitution is from 2.83 to 2.98, and in yet another embodiment, the total degree of substitution is from 2.85 to 2.95. In another embodiment of the invention, the total degree of substitution is such that the total hydroxyl level is low enough to produce the desired retardation behavior.


The cellulose esters described in US 2009/0054638 and US 2009/0050842 can be prepared by a number of synthetic routes, including, but not limited to, acid-catalyzed esterification and hydrolysis of cellulose.


For example, as described in US 2009/0054638 and US 2009/0050842, cellulose (75 g) was fluffed in a metal lab blender in three batches. This fluffed cellulose was treated in one of the following four pretreatments.


Pretreatment A: The fluffed cellulose was soaked in mixtures of acetic acid and propionic acid. Then the reaction was carried out as shown below.


Pretreatment B: The fluffed cellulose was soaked in 1 liter of water for about 1 hour. The wet pulp was filtered and washed four times with acetic acid to yield acetic acid wet pulp and the reaction carried out as shown below.


Pretreatment C: The fluffed cellulose was soaked in about 1 liter of water for about 1 hour. The wet pulp was filtered and washed four times with propionic acid to yield propionic acid wet pulp and the reaction carried out as shown below.


Pretreatment D: The fluffed cellulose was soaked in about 1 liter of water for about 1 hour. The wet pulp was filtered and washed three times with acetic acid and three times with propionic acid to yield propionic wet pulp and the reaction carried out as shown below.


Reaction: The acid wet pulp from one of the pretreatments above was then placed in a 2-liter reaction kettle and acetic or propionic acid was added. The reaction mass was cooled to 15° C., and a 10° C. solution of acetic anhydride and propionic anhydride, and 2.59 g of sulfuric acid were added. After the initial exotherm, the reaction mixture was held at about 25° C. for 30 minutes and then the reaction mixture was heated to 60° C. When the proper viscosity of the mixture was obtained, a 50-60° C. solution of 296 mL of acetic acid and 121 mL of water was added. This mixture was allowed to stir for 30 minutes and then a solution of 4.73 g of magnesium acetate tetrahydrate in 385 mL of acetic acid and 142 mL of water was added. This reaction mixture was then precipitated by one of the methods shown below.


Precipitation Method A: The reaction mixture was precipitated by the addition of 8 L of water. The resulting slurry was filtered and washed with water for about four hours and then dried in a 60° C. forced air oven to yield cellulose acetate propionate.


Precipitation Method B: The reaction mixture was precipitated by the addition of 4 L of 10% acetic acid and then hardened by addition of 4 L of water. The resulting slurry was filtered and washed with water for about four hours and then dried in a 60° C. forced air oven to yield cellulose acetate propionate.


Examples of regioselectively substituted cellulose esters having a DSOH from about 0.0 to about 0.5 useful for layer A and regioselectively substituted cellulose esters having a DSOH from about 0.5 to about 1.3 useful for layer B are described in US 2010/0029927, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/539,817, and WO 2010/019245; the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.


In general, US 2010/0029927, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/539,817, and WO 2010/019245 concern dissolution of cellulose in an ionic liquid, which is then contacted with an acylating reagent. Accordingly, for the present invention, cellulose esters can be prepared by contacting the cellulose solution with one or more C1-C20 acylating reagents at a contact temperature and contact time sufficient to provide a cellulose ester with the desired degree of substitution (DS) and degree of polymerization (DP). The cellulose esters thus prepared generally comprise the following structure:




embedded image


where R2, R3, and R6 are hydrogen (with the proviso that R2, R3, and R6 are not hydrogen simultaneously) or C1-C20 straight- or branched-chain alkyl or aryl groups bound to the cellulose via an ester linkage.


The cellulose esters prepared by these methods may have a DS from about 0.1 to about 3.0, preferably from about 1.7 to about 3.0, more preferably from about 1.65 to about 2.65, and yet more preferably from about 1.85 to about 2.35. The degree of polymerization (DP) of the cellulose esters prepared by these methods will be at least 10. More preferred is when the DP of the cellulose esters is at least 50. Yet further preferred is when the DP of the cellulose esters is at least 100. Most preferred is when the DP of the cellulose esters is at least 250. In yet another embodiment, the DP of the cellulose esters is from about 5 to about 100. More preferred is when the DP of the cellulose esters is from about 10 to about 50.


The preferred acylating reagents are one or more C1-C20 straight- or branched-chain alkyl or aryl carboxylic anhydrides, carboxylic acid halides, diketene, alkyl diketene, or acetoacetic acid esters. Examples of carboxylic anhydrides include, but are not limited to, acetic anhydride, propionic anhydride, butyric anhydride, isobutyric anhydride, valeric anhydride, hexanoic anhydride, 2-ethylhexanoic anhydride, nonanoic anhydride, lauric anhydride, palmitic anhydride, stearic anhydride, benzoic anhydride, substituted benzoic anhydrides, phthalic anhydride, and isophthalic anhydride. Examples of carboxylic acid halides include, but are not limited to, acetyl, propionyl, butyryl, hexanoyl, 2-ethylhexanoyl, lauroyl, palmitoyl, benzoyl, substituted benzoyl, and stearoyl chlorides. Examples of acetoacetic acid esters include, but are not limited to, methyl acetoacetate, ethyl acetoacetate, propyl acetoacetate, butyl acetoacetate, and tert-butyl acetoacetate. The most preferred acylating reagents are C2-C9 straight- or branched-chain alkyl carboxylic anhydrides selected from the group acetic anhydride, propionic anhydride, butyric anhydride, 2-ethylhexanoic anhydride, nonanoic anhydride, and stearic anhydride. The acylating reagents can be added after the cellulose has been dissolved in the ionic liquid. If so desired, the acylating reagent can be added to the ionic liquid prior to dissolving the cellulose in the ionic liquid.


In the esterification of cellulose dissolved in ionic liquids, the preferred contact temperature is from about 20° C. to about 140° C. A more preferred contact temperature is from about 50° C. to about 100° C. The most preferred contact temperature is from about 60° C. to about 80° C.


In the esterification of cellulose dissolved in ionic liquids, the preferred contact time is from about 1 min to about 48 h. A more preferred contact time is from about 10 min to about 24 h. The most preferred contact time is from about 30 min to about 5 h.


Examples of randomly substituted cellulose esters having a DSOH from about 0.5 to about 1.3 useful for layer B are described in US 2009/0096962, which is hereby incorporated by reference.


The cellulose esters described in US 2009/0096962 can be prepared by a number of synthetic routes, including, but not limited to, acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of a previously prepared cellulose ester in an appropriate solvent or mixture of solvents and base-catalyzed hydrolysis of a previously prepared cellulose ester in an appropriate solvent or mixture of solvents. Additionally, high DSOH cellulose esters can be prepared from cellulose by a number of known methods. For additional details on synthetic routes for preparing high DSOH cellulose esters, see U.S. Pat. No. 2,327,770; S. Gedon et al., “Cellulose Esters, Organic Esters,” from Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Fifth Edition, Vol. 5, pp. 412-444, 2004, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J.; and D. Klemm et al., “Comprehensive Cellulose Chemistry: Volume 2 Functionalization of Cellulose,” Wiley-VCH, New York, 1998.


In one embodiment, conventional cellulose esters (for example, but not limited to CAB-381-20 and CAP-482-20, commercially available from Eastman Chemical Company) are dissolved in an organic carboxylic acid, such as acetic acid, propionic acid, or butyric acid, or mixture of organic carboxylic acids, such as acetic acid, propionic acid, or butyric acid to form a dope. The resulting cellulose ester dopes can be treated with water and an inorganic acid catalyst, including, but not limited to, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, and phosphoric acid, to hydrolyze the ester groups to increase the DSOH.


The same hydrolysis protocols described above can be accomplished with non-acidic catalysts, such as bases. Additionally, solid catalysts such as ion exchange resins can be used. Additionally, the solvent used to dissolve the initial cellulose ester prior to hydrolysis can be an organic solvent that is not an organic acid solvent; examples of which include, but are not limited to, ketones, alcohols, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF).


Additional methods for preparing high DSOH cellulose esters include preparation of the high DSOH cellulose esters from cellulose from wood or cotton. The cellulose can be a high-purity dissolving grade wood pulp or cotton linters. The cellulose can, alternatively, be isolated from any of a number of biomass sources including, but not limited to, corn fiber.


In one embodiment of this invention, additives such as plasticizers, stabilizers, UV absorbers, antiblocks, slip agents, lubricants, dyes, pigments, retardation modifiers, etc. may be mixed with the cellulose esters. Examples of these additives are found in US 2009/0050842, US 2009/0054638, and US 2009/0096962; the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.


Examples of plasticizers include but are not limited to one or more of the following, phosphoric acid-based plasticizers, phthalic acid ester-based plasticizers, glycolate-based plasticizers, and citric acid ester-based plasticizers, carbohydrate ester-based plasticizers, and alditol ester-based plasticizers.


Examples of phosphoric acid ester-based plasticizers include but are not limited to triphenyl phosphate (TPP), tricresyl phosphate, cresyl phenyl phosphate, octyl diphenyl phosphate, diphenyl biphenyl phosphate, trioctyl phosphate, and tributyl phosphate. Phthalic acid ester-based plasticizers include but are not limited to diethyl phthalate, dimethoxyethyl phthalate, dimethyl phthalate, dioctyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, di-2-ethyl hexyl phthalate, butyl benzyl phthalate, di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate, butyl benzyl phthalate, and dibenzyl phthalate. Citric acid ester-based plasticizers include but are not limited to acetyl trimethyl citrate, and acetyl tributyl citrate. Glycolate-based plasticizers include but are not limited to alkyl phthalyl alkyl glycolate, such as methyl phthalyl methyl glycolate, ethyl phthalyl ethyl glycolate (EPEG), propyl phthalyl propyl glycolate, butyl phthalyl butyl glycolate, octyl phthalyl octyl glycolate, methyl phthalyl ethyl glycolate, ethyl phthalyl methyl glycolate, ethyl phthalyl propyl glycolate, propyl phthalyl ethyl glycolate, methyl phthalyl propyl glycolate, methyl phthalyl butyl glycolate, ethyl phthalyl butyl glycolate, butyl phthalyl methyl glycolate, butyl phthalyl ethyl glycolate, propyl phthalyl butyl glycolate, butyl phthalyl propyl glycolate, methyl phthalyl octyl glycolate, ethyl phthalyl octyl glycolate, octyl phthalyl methyl glycolate, and octyl phthalyl ethyl glycolate. Other useful plasticizers include, but are not limited to, butyl oleate, methyl acetyl ricinolate, dibutyl sebacate, and triacetin. Carbohydrate ester-based plasticizers include, but are not limited to, esters of 6-carbon aldose sugars, such as glucose pentapropionate, glucose pentaisobutyrate, and glucose pentatbutyrate; esters of 6-carbon ketose sugars such as fructose pentapropionate, fructose pentaisobutyrate, fructose pentatbutyrate; esters of 5-carbon aldose sugars, such as xylose tetrapropionate, xylose tetraisobutyrate, and xylose tetrabutryate. Alditol ester-based plasticizers include but are not limited to 5-carbon alditol esters, such as xylitol pentapropionate, xylitol pentaisobutryate, and xylitol pentabutyrate; 6-carbon alditol esters, such as mannitol hexapropionate, mannitol hexaisobutyrate, and mannitol hexabutyrate. Other useful plasticizers include triphenyl phosphate, xylitol pentaacetate, trimethyl pentanoyl diisobutyrate, 2-naphthyl benzoate or mixtures thereof.


The multilayer film according to the invention can be made by solvent co-casting, melt co-extrusion, lamination, or a coating process. These procedures are generally known in the art. Examples of solvent co-casting, melt co-extrusion, lamination, and coating methods to form multilayer structures are found in US 2009/0050842, US 2009/0054638, and US 2009/0096962.


Further examples of solvent co-casting, melt co-extrusion, lamination, and coating methods to form a multilayer structure are found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,592,885; U.S. Pat. No. 7,172,713; US 2005/0133953; and US 2010/0055356, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.


The multilayer film may be configured in an A-B structure or an A-B-A structure (FIGS. 4(a) and 4(b), respectively). In the case of a bi-layer structure, the layers are made using different cellulose esters. For the tri-layer structure, the top and bottom layers are made using the same cellulose ester and the middle layer is made using a different cellulose ester. Other configurations are possible such as A-X-B where X is an adhesive or tie layer, and B-A-B. The thickness of each layer can be the same or different. By varying the thickness of each layer, the desired optical retardation and reversed optical dispersion can be obtained. The thickness of layer A before stretching can range from 5 μm to 50 μm, and the thickness of layer B before stretching can range from 30 μm to 100 μm.


To obtain certain in-plane retardation (Re) values, the multilayer film may be stretched. By adjusting the stretch conditions such as stretch temperature, stretch ratio, stretch type—uniaxial or biaxial, pre-heat time and temperature, and post-stretch annealing time and temperature; the desired Re, Rth, and reverse optical dispersion can be achieved. The stretching temperature can range from 130° C. to 200° C. The stretch ratio can range from 1.0 to 1.4 in the machine direction (MD) and can range from 1.1 to 2.0 in the transverse direction (TD). The pre-heat time can range from 10 to 300 seconds, and the pre-heat temperature can be the same as the stretch temperature. The post-annealing time can range from 0 to 300 seconds, and the post-annealing temperature can range from 10° C. to 40° C. below the stretching temperature.


For applications such as an optical waveplate for LCDs, certain optical retardations Re and Rth as well as optical dispersion are desired. Hence, in one embodiment of this invention, a single-layer film of layer A after uniaxial or biaxial stretching has an Re(550) from −80 nm to −10 nm, an Rth(550) from 0 nm to 100 nm, ARe and ARth from about 1.0 to 1.6, and BRe and BRth from about 1.0 to 0.6. In another embodiment, a single-layer film of layer A after stretching in at least one direction has an Re(550) from about 10 nm to 60 nm, Rth(550) from about 0 nm to −60 nm, ARe and ARth from about 0.5 to 1.0, and BRe and BRth from about 1.0 to 1.3. In yet another embodiment, a single-layer film of layer A after uniaxial or biaxial stretching has an Re(550) from −60 nm to −20 nm, Rth(550) from 0 nm to 60 nm, ARe and ARth from 1.2 to 1.6, and BRe and BRth from 0.5 to 0.8. In another embodiment, a single-layer film of layer A after stretching in at least one direction has an Re(550) from about 10 nm to 40 nm, Rth(550) from 0 nm to −40 nm, ARe and ARth from about 0.5 to 0.8, and BRe and BRth from about 1.1 to 1.3. In still yet another embodiment, a single-layer film of layer A after uniaxial or biaxial stretching has an Re(550) from about −50 nm to −30 nm, Rth(550) from about 0 nm to 40 nm, ARe and ARth from about 1.4 to 1.6, and BRe and BRth from about 0.5 to 0.7. In another embodiment, a single-layer film of layer A after stretching in at least one direction has an Re(550) from about 15 nm to 30 nm, Rth(550) from about 0 nm to −30 nm, ARe and ARth from about 0.5 to 0.7, and BRe and BRth from about 1.2 to 1.3.


In embodiment of this invention, a single-layer film of layer B after uniaxial or biaxial stretching has an Re(550) from about 10 nm to 350 nm, Rth(550) from about −100 nm to −400 nm, ARe and ARth from about 0.97 to 1.1, and BRe and BRth from about 0.97 to 1.05. In another embodiment, a single-layer film of layer B after uniaxial or biaxial stretching has an Re(550) from about 45 nm to 300 nm, Rth(550) from about −150 nm to −350 nm, ARe and ARth from about 0.97 to 1.0, and BRe and BRth from about 1.0 to 1.05. In another embodiment, a single-layer film of layer B after uniaxial or biaxial stretching has Re(550) from about 55 nm to 280 nm, Rth(550) from about −180 nm to −300 nm, ARe and ARth from about 0.97 to 0.99, and BRe and BRth from about 1.0 to 1.06.


In another aspect of this invention, the cellulose ester single layer film after uniaxial or biaxial stretching has Re(589) from about 100 nm to 400 nm, Rth(589) from about −40 nm to −400 nm, ARe and ARth are from about 0.85 to 1.0, BRe and BRth are from about 1.0 to 1.15. In another embodiment of the invention, the cellulose ester single layer film after uniaxial or biaxial stretching has Re(589) from about 120 nm to 300 nm, Rth(589) from about −60 nm to −280 nm, ARe and ARth are from about 0.880 to 0.99, BRe and BRth are from about 1.0 to 1.10. In another embodiment of the invention, the cellulose ester single layer film after uniaxial or biaxial stretching has Re(589) from about 140 nm to 270 nm, Rth(589) from about −70 nm to −200 nm; ARe and ARth are from about 0.93 to 0.98, BRe and BRth are from about 1.0 to 1.06.


After uniaxial or biaxial stretching, the multilayer film according to the invention can have an Re(550) from about 10 nm to 300 nm, Rth(550) from about −50 nm to −300 nm, ARe and ARth from about 0.95 to 1.0, and BRe and BRth from about 1.0 to 1.06. In another embodiment, the multilayer film after uniaxial or biaxial stretching can have an Re(550) from about 40 nm to 280 nm, Rth(550) from about −70 nm to −300 nm, ARe and ARth from about 0.90 to 0.97, and BRe and BRth from about 1.05 to 1.1. In another embodiment, the multilayer film after uniaxial or biaxial stretching can have an Re(550) from about 55 nm to 250 nm, Rth(550) from about −70 nm to −280 nm, ARe and ARth from about 0.82 to 0.95, and BRe and BRth are from about 1.06 to 1.18.


The Re and Rth values reported above for wavelength 550 nm are based on a film thickness of 30 to 120 μm.


In yet another embodiment, layer A and layer B each can have an Re of 0 to 280 nm and an Rth of −400 to +200 nm, measured at a film thickness of 30 to 120 μm and at a light wavelength of 550 nm.


Currently, it is common practice to use two or more compensation films to obtain LCDs with adequate viewing angles, contrast ratios, and color shifts. For example, a broadband quarter waveplate is achieved by combining one half-waveplate with one quarter-waveplate. This is shown in FIG. 5. (Cf. Pancharatnam, Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Science, Sec. A., Vol. 41., 130-136 (1955); Tae-Hoon Yoon et al., Optics Letters, Vol. 25, No. 20 1547-1549, 2000.) Both the half-waveplate and the quarter-waveplate in FIG. 5 have normal optical dispersion. After laminating them together with certain orientation, the combination has the retardation of a quarter-waveplate and reversed optical dispersion. This practice, however, is undesirable because it consumes more materials, is complicated to construct, and results in a thick display. In contrast, we have surprisingly found that the multilayer films of the present invention (such as shown in FIGS. 4(a) and 4(b)) can provide optical waveplates with excellent viewing angles, contrast ratios, and color shifts when used as a single waveplate in LCDs. Moreover, the individual layers of the films of the present invention do not need special orientation relative to each other in order to have reversed optical dispersion.


Thus, in another aspect, the present invention provides an optical waveplate for a liquid crystal display. The optical waveplate has a reversed optical dispersion and is composed of the multilayer films according to the present invention.


Thus, in another aspect, the present invention provides an optical waveplate for a liquid crystal display. The optical waveplate has a reversed optical dispersion and is composed of the single layer films according to the present invention.


In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a liquid crystal display which comprises the optical waveplate according to the present invention. The optical waveplate comprises a single layer film according to the present invention.


Thus, in another aspect, the present invention provides an optical waveplate for a circular polarizer for an Organic light emitting diode (OLED) display. The optical waveplate has a reversed optical dispersion and is composed of the single layer films according to the present invention.


Thus, in another aspect, the present invention provides an optical waveplate for a three-dimensional (3-D) display. The optical waveplate has a reversed optical dispersion and is composed of the single layer films according to the present invention.


Thus, in another aspect, the present invention provides an optical waveplate for glasses for watching a three-dimensional (3-D) display. The optical waveplate has a reversed optical dispersion and is composed of the single layer films according to the present invention.


This invention can be further illustrated by the following working examples, although it should be understood that these examples are included merely for purposes of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.


EXAMPLES
General Procedures

Solution preparation: Cellulose ester solids and 10 wt % plasticizer (based on the total weight of solids) were added to a 87/13 wt % solvent mixture of CH2Cl2/methanol (or ethanol) to give a final concentration of 5-30 wt % based on cellulose ester+plasticizer. The mixture was sealed, placed on a roller, and mixed for 24 hours to create a uniform solution.


Solvent casting of a single-layer film: The solution prepared above was cast onto a glass plate using a doctor blade to obtain a film with the desired thickness. Casting was conducted in a fume hood with relative humidity controlled at 45%-50%. After casting, the film was allowed to dry for 45 minutes under a cover pan to reduce the rate of solvent evaporation before the pan was removed. The film was allowed to dry for 15 minutes, then the film was peeled from the glass and annealed in a forced air oven for 10 minutes at 100° C. After annealing at 100° C., the film was annealed at a higher temperature (120° C.) for another 10 minutes.


Film uniaxial or biaxial stretching was carried out on a Brückner Karo IV laboratory film stretcher. Constrained uniaxial stretch means the film is held by the tenter frame on all sides; non-constrained uniaxial stretch means the film is held only in the stretching direction, which allows the film to neck in during stretching. Stretching conditions, such as stretch ratio (MD: machine direction, TD: transverse direction), stretch temperature, and pre-heating and post-annealing time and temperature, will affect the film final optical retardations and dispersion. These conditions can be varied to achieve specific optical retardation and dispersion according to the requirements of the application.


Film optical retardation and dispersion measurements were made using a J.A. Woollam M-2000V Spectroscopic Ellipsometer having a spectral range from 370 to 1000 nm. RetMeas (Retardation Measurement) program from J.A. Woollam Co., Inc. was used to obtain optical film in-plane (Re) and out-of-plane (Rth) retardations. Unless specified otherwise, all reported values were measured at 589 nm.


Film haze was measured by UltraScan XE from HunterLab using standard calibration and measurement procedures.


Example 1
Comparative

This example shows the optical retardation and dispersion of a single-layer film suitable for layer B in an optical waveplate.


Following the general solution preparation, a randomly substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=0.14, DSPr=1.71, DSOH=1.15) was used to prepare the following solution for Example 1:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g



Plasticizer
2.4
g triphenyl phosphate



Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Example 1 was used to obtain single-layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially or simultaneous biaxially stretched under different stretching conditions. The stretching conditions and optical and film data of these films are listed in Table 1.









TABLE 1







Optical properties for a single-layer cellulose acetate propionate film


(DSAc = 0.14, DSPr = 1.71, DSOH = 1.15).


















Stretch






Film




Temp.
Re
Rth




Thickness


Run
MD × TD
(° C.)
(nm)
(nm)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(micron)



















1
1.00 × 1.40
175
152.31
−301.86
0.993
1.001
0.999
0.994
68


2
1.00 × 1.45
180
146.67
−271.03
0.993
1.002
0.998
0.995
68


3
1.00 × 1.40
180
135.07
−275.95
0.992
1.002
0.998
0.994
70


4
1.00 × 1.35
177
105.94
−248.51
0.994
1.002
0.998
0.995
70


5
1.00 × 1.35
180
120.68
−257.34
0.994
1.002
1.000
0.994
72


6
1.04 × 1.26
175
73.08
−297.34
0.991
1.002
0.995
1.000
74









Relative to an ideal achromatic waveplate in which ARe=ARth=0.818 and BRe=BRth=1.182, the data in Table 1 indicate that these films exhibited only a slight reversed dispersion. That is, the dispersion curves of these films were essentially flat.


Example 2
Comparative

This example shows the optical retardation and dispersion of a single-layer film suitable for layer A in an optical waveplate.


Following the general solution preparation, a randomly (RDS: C6=0.92, C3=1.00, C2=0.96) substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=1.49, DSPr=1.44, DSOH=0.07) was used to prepare the following solution for Example 2:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g



Plasticizer
2.4
g Triphenyl phosphate



Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Example 2 was used to obtain single-layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially or simultaneous biaxially stretched under different stretching conditions. The stretching conditions and optical and film data of these films are listed in Table 2.









TABLE 2







Optical properties for a single-layer cellulose acetate propionate film


(DSAc = 1.49, DSPr = 1.44, DSOH = 0.07).


















Stretch






Film




Temp.
Re
Rth




Thickness


Run
MD × TD
(° C.)
(nm)
(nm)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRe
(micron)



















7
1.00 × 1.50
160
−9.56
11.15
1.536
0.706
1.471
0.593
58


8
1.00 × 1.60
160
−11.83
12.93
1.511
0.729
1.413
0.648
56


9
1.00 × 1.70
160
−12.59
10.40
1.476
0.737
1.409
0.606
48


10 
1.00 × 1.80
160
−16.48
10.87
1.427
0.766
1.476
0.638
48


11*
1.00 × 1.80
160
−53.48
31.32
1.337
0.815
1.228
0.791
80


12*
1.00 × 1.90
160
−57.66
32.71
1.347
0.811
1.225
0.784
86


13*
1.00 × 2.00
160
−55.74
27.57
1.362
0.803
1.249
0.761
80





*= The film was not constrained in the MD while stretching.






Relative to an ideal achromatic waveplate in which ARe=ARth=0.818 and BRe=BRth=1.182, the data in Table 2 show that these films did not exhibit a reversed dispersion. In fact, ARe and ARth are all greater than 1, while BRe and BRth are less than one, which is characteristic of a normal dispersion.


Example 3
Comparative

This example shows the optical retardation and dispersion of a single-layer film suitable for layer A in an optical waveplate.


A regioselectively substituted cellulose benzoate propionate in which the benzoate was primarily located on C2 and C3 was prepared according to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/539,817. 325.26 g of tributylmethylammonium dimethylphosphate ([TBMA]DMP) was added to a 3-neck 1 L round bottom flask equipped with mechanical stirring, a N2/vacuum inlet, and an iC10 diamond tipped infrared probe (Mettler-Toledo AutoChem, Inc., Columbia, Md., USA). The flask was placed in a 100° C. oil bath and the [TBMA]DMP was stirred 17 h under vacuum (0.8-1.4 mm Hg). 139.4 g of NMP (30 wt %) was added to the [TBMA]DMP, and then the mixture was cooled to room temperature. While stirring rapidly at room temperature, 34.97 g of cellulose (7 wt %, DPv (degree of polymerization as determined from Cuene viscosity) 1080) was added to the solution (9 min addition). The mixture was stirred for an additional 3 min to insure that the cellulose was well dispersed before raising a preheated 100° C. oil bath to the flask. Sixty minutes after raising the oil bath, there were no visible particles and the solution was light amber. To insure complete cellulose dissolution, stirring was continued for an additional 70 minutes. 2.1 equivalents of Pr2O (propionic anhydride) was added drop-wise (28 min addition) to the cellulose solution at 100° C. Ten minutes after the end of Pr2O addition, a total of 3 equivalents of benzoic anhydride was added as a liquid (melted at 85° C.). The contact mixture was stirred for 80 minutes before the IR probe was removed from the contact mixture. The contact mixture was immediately poured into 2.5 L of MeOH while mixing with a homogenizer. The solids were isolated by filtration then washed 10× with 2 L portions of MeOH before drying overnight at 10 mm Hg, 50° C. Analysis by 1H NMR revealed that the cellulose ester had a DSBz=0.29, DSPr=2.26, DSOH=0.45. Analysis by quantitative carbon 13 NMR showed that the product was regioselectively substituted having a ring RDS of: C6=1.00, C3=0.68, C2=0.84.


Following the general solution preparation, the regioselectively substituted cellulose benzoate propionate was used to prepare the following solution for Example 3:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g



Plasticizer
2.4
g triphenyl phosphate



Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Example 3 was used to obtain single-layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially or simultaneous biaxially stretched under different stretching conditions. The stretching conditions and optical and film data of these films are listed in Table 3.









TABLE 3







Optical properties for a single-layer cellulose benzoate propionate film


(DSBz = 0.29, DSPr = 2.26, DSOH = 0.45).


















Stretch






Film




Temp.
Re
Rth




Thickness


Run
MD × TD
(° C.)
(nm)
(nm)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(micron)



















14
1.00 × 1.30
165
−32.47
−6.76
1.207
0.898
−19.350
16.300
58


15
1.00 × 1.40
165
−41.56
−22.05
1.194
0.900
0.262
1.542
56


16
1.00 × 1.50
165
−55.67
−24.66
1.185
0.903
0.330
1.494
54


17
1.00 × 1.60
165
−83.05
−17.31
1.190
0.905
−0.436
2.081
64


 18*
1.00 × 1.40
165
−110.71
57.08
1.251
0.873
1.257
0.800
88


 19*
1.00 × 1.50
165
−125.81
59.83
1.242
0.878
1.260
0.799
86


 20*
1.00 × 1.60
165
−156.69
75.23
1.228
0.885
1.243
0.814
90





*= The film was not constrained in the MD while stretching.






Relative to an ideal achromatic waveplate in which ARe=ARth=0.818 and BRe=BRth=1.182, the data in Table 2 show that these films did not exhibit a reversed dispersion. In fact, the values for ARe and BRe indicate that the films exhibited a normal dispersion.


Example 4
Comparative

This example shows the optical retardation and dispersion of a single-layer film suitable for layer A in an optical waveplate.


Following the general solution preparation, a randomly (RDS: C6=0.85, C3=0.92, C2=0.90) substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=0.79, DSPr=2.00, DSOH=0.21) was used to prepare the following solution for Example 4:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g



Plasticizer
2.4
g Triphenyl phosphate



Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Example 4 was used to obtain single-layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially or simultaneous biaxially stretched under different stretching conditions. The stretching conditions and optical and film data of these films are listed in Table 4.









TABLE 4







Optical properties for a single-layer cellulose acetate propionate film


(DSAc = 0.79, DSPr = 2.00, DSOH = 0.21).


















Stretch






Film




Temp.
Re
Rth




Thickness


Run
MD × TD
(° C.)
(nm)
(nm)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(micron)





21 
1.00 × 1.50
150
12.81
−30.81
0.577
1.226
0.807
1.158
64


22 
1.00 × 1.60
150
14.25
−31.83
0.538
1.251
0.807
1.161
58


23 
1.00 × 1.70
150
15.26
−30.57
0.494
1.270
0.810
1.170
58


24*
1.00 × 1.70
150
33.70
−23.44
0.522
1.260
0.644
1.297
82


25*
1.00 × 1.80
150
33.49
−23.39
0.542
1.245
0.682
1.296
72


26*
1.00 × 1.90
150
35.07
−23.43
0.516
1.259
0.656
1.305
74


27*
1.00 × 2.00
150
34.31
−21.65
0.505
1.267
0.623
1.391
72





*= The film was not constrained in the MD while stretching.






Relative to an ideal achromatic waveplate in which ARe=ARth=0.818 and BRe=BRth=1.182, the data in Table 4 show that these films did exhibit a reversed dispersion. However, the smaller values for ARe (0.49-0.58) and the larger values for BRe (1.22-1.27) showed that the slopes were much larger than that of an ideal achromatic waveplate (cf. FIG. 2). Moreover, the Rth values (−22 to −32) were too small to be suitable for use in certain LCDs.


Example 5
Comparative

This example shows the optical retardation and dispersion of a single-layer film suitable for layer A in an optical waveplate.


Following the general solution preparation, a randomly (RDS: C6=0.84, C3=0.92, C2=0.88) substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=0.04, DSPr=2.69, DSOH=0.27) was used to prepare the following solution for Example 5:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g



Plasticizer
2.4
g Triphenyl phosphate



Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Example 5 was used to obtain single-layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially or simultaneous biaxially stretched under different stretching conditions. The stretching conditions and optical and film data of these films are listed in Table 5.









TABLE 5







Optical properties for a single-layer cellulose acetate propionate film


(DSAc = 0.04, DSPr = 2.69, DSOH = 0.27).


















Stretch






Film




Temp.
Re
Rth




Thickness


Run
MD × TD
(° C.)
(nm)
(nm)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRe
(micron)





28 
1.00 × 1.50
135
19.55
−45.12
0.762
1.127
0.903
1.083
60


29 
1.00 × 1.60
135
21.48
−43.29
0.738
1.139
0.893
1.091
56


30*
1.00 × 1.60
135
46.57
−30.96
0.775
1.121
0.818
1.150
76


31*
1.00 × 1.70
135
49.39
−30.41
0.763
1.129
0.804
1.162
74


32*
1.00 × 1.80
135
48.19
−29.15
0.749
1.135
0.799
1.173
72


33 
1.00 × 1.70
135
34.88
−38.98
0.742
1.141
0.856
1.118
68


34*
1.00 × 2.00
135
47.98
−29.41
0.722
1.147
0.773
1.197
72





*= The film was not constrained in the MD while stretching.






Relative to an ideal achromatic waveplate in which ARe=ARth=0.818 and BRe=BRth=1.182, the data in Table 5 show that these films did exhibit a reversed dispersion, but with a different slope (cf. FIG. 2). Again, the Rth values (−29 to −45) were too small to be suitable for use in certain LCDs.


Example 6

This example shows the optical retardation and dispersion of a bi-layer optical waveplate prepared by solvent co-casting.


A randomly (RDS: C6=0.92, C3=1.00, C2=0.96) substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=1.49, DSPr=1.44, DSOH=0.07) was used to prepare the following solution for layer A for Example 6:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g










Plasticizer
2.4 g Xylitol Pentaacetate











Total solvent
276
g



Methylene chloride
240.12
g



Methanol
35.88
g










A randomly substituted cellulose acetate propionate (IDSAc=0.14, DSPr=1.71, DSOH=1.15) was used to prepare the following solution for layer B for Example 6:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g










Plasticizer
2.4 g Triphenyl phosphate











Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general procedure for solution preparation, solutions for layers A and B were independently prepared. The solution for layer B was first cast on a glass plate with a doctor blade at a certain thickness and covered by a pan for 5 minutes. The solution for layer A was then cast on top of the layer B and covered by a pan for 45 minutes. The cover pan was removed and the bi-layer film was left on the glass plate for an additional 15 minutes. The film was peeled from the glass plate then annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively. Films made in this manner were uniaxially or simultaneous biaxially stretched under different stretching conditions. The stretching conditions and optical and film data of these films are listed in Table 6.









TABLE 6







Optical properties for a bi-layer optical waveplate prepared by co-casting.



















Stretch






Film





Temp.
Re
Rth




Thickness
Haze


Run
MD × TD
(° C.)
(nm)
(nm)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(micron)
(%)




















35
1.00 × 1.30
165
116.85
−266.08
0.972
1.015
0.975
1.016
100
0.44


36
1.10 × 1.40
170
80.86
−268.99
0.964
1.020
0.973
1.018
80
0.47


37
1.00 × 1.27
165
97.43
−241.59
0.972
1.015
0.971
1.020
88
0.56


38
1.05 × 1.40
170
94.07
−266.24
0.966
1.017
0.978
1.014
84
0.42


39
1.03 × 1.40
175
92.83
−206.28
0.965
1.017
0.973
1.017
82
0.36









As shown in Example 1, as a single-layer film, the cellulose ester used to make layer B exhibited large positive values for Re and large negative values for Rth, but the film exhibited a flat dispersion. As shown in Example 2, as a single-layer film, the cellulose ester used to make layer A exhibited negative Re values and positive Rth values, and the film exhibited a normal dispersion.


In accordance with this invention, when the two cellulose esters were used to construct a bi-layer optical waveplate, the Re and Rth values of the two cellulose esters were additive. As used herein, the term “additive” does not necessarily refer to the arithmetic sum of the two values, but is simply used in the sense that the absolute value of Re decreased relative to Example 1 and increased relative to Example 2. Similarly, the absolute value for Rth decreased relative to Example 1 and increased relative to Example 2. Significantly, the bi-layer optical waveplate now exhibited a reversed dispersion. It is important to note that layers A and B did not have a special orientation with respect to each other. Furthermore, as the data in Table 6 show, these films have very low haze. Hence, the bi-layer optical waveplate simultaneously provided high optical retardation and a reversed dispersion.


Example 7

This example shows the optical retardation and dispersion of a tri-layer optical waveplate prepared by solvent co-casting.


The solutions for layer A and layer B were the same as those in Example 6.


The solution for layer A was first cast on a glass plate with a doctor blade at a certain thickness and covered by a pan for 4 minutes. The solution for layer B was then cast on top of the layer A and covered by a pan for 4 minutes. Then a third layer using solution A was cast on top of the layer B and covered by a pan for 45 minutes. The cover pan was removed and the tri-layer film was left on the glass plate for an additional 15 minutes. The film was peeled from the glass plate then annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively. Films made in this manner were uniaxially or simultaneous biaxially stretched under different stretching conditions. The stretching conditions and optical and film data of these films are listed in Table 7.









TABLE 7







Optical properties for a tri-layer optical waveplate prepared by co-casting.



















Stretch






Film





Temp.
Re
Rth




Thickness
Haze


Run
MD × TD
(° C.)
(nm)
(nm)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(micron)
(%)




















40
1.00 × 1.30
170
90.86
−251.57
0.971
1.015
0.981
1.009
80
0.33


41
1.00 × 1.30
170
85.73
−244.95
0.971
1.016
0.983
1.010
78
0.35


42
1.00 × 1.35
175
114.23
−276.40
0.967
1.018
0.981
1.011
88
0.36


43
1.00 × 1.35
175
100.41
−249.56
0.971
1.016
0.980
1.011
78
0.32









Similar to Example 6, when the two cellulose esters were used to construct a tri-layer optical waveplate, the Re and Rth values of the two cellulose esters were additive, and reversed dispersion and low haze were obtained. Thus, the tri-layer optical waveplate simultaneously provided high optical retardation and a reversed dispersion. By varying the cellulose ester for each layer, layer thickness, and stretching and annealing conditions, it was possible to construct optical waveplates with a range of Re and Rth values, and reversed dispersion.


Example 8

This example shows the optical retardation and dispersion of a bi-layer optical waveplate prepared by solvent coating.


The solutions for layer A and layer B were the same as those of Example 6.


The solution for layer B was first cast on a glass plate with a doctor blade at a certain thickness and covered by a pan for 45 minutes. The cover pan was removed and the film was left on the glass plate for an additional 15 minutes. The solution for layer A was then coated on top of layer B at a thickness much less than layer B. The coated film was then covered by a pan for 20 minutes. The cover pan was removed and the coated film was left on the glass plate for an additional 20 minutes. The film was peeled from the glass plate then annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively. Films made in this manner were uniaxially or simultaneous biaxially stretched under different stretching conditions. The stretching conditions and optical and film data of these films are listed in Table 8.









TABLE 8







Optical retardation and dispersion of a bi-layer


optical waveplate prepared by solvent coating.



















Stretch






Film





Temp.
Re
Rth




Thickness
Haze


Run
MD × TD
(° C.)
(nm)
(nm)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(micron)
(%)




















44
1.00 × 1.30
175
89.43
−263.71
0.979
1.011
0.982
1.009
66
0.73


45
1.00 × 1.40
175
114.57
−274.07
0.976
1.014
0.981
1.009
64
1.89


46
1.00 × 1.30
175
96.81
−253.28
0.979
1.012
0.983
1.009
72
0.46


47
1.00 × 1.35
180
112.35
−260.85
0.979
1.012
0.980
1.012
70
0.56


48
1.00 × 1.40
180
122.34
−293.01
0.978
1.012
0.979
1.012
66
0.91









Similar to Example 6, when the two cellulose esters were used to construct a bi-layer optical waveplate, the Re and Rth values of the two cellulose esters were additive. In Example 6, the bi-layer optical waveplate was prepared by solvent co-casting while in this example, the bi-layer optical waveplate was prepared by coating dried layer B with the solution of layer A. Comparing the data in Table 8 with those in Table 6, it is evident the optical retardations and dispersions are very similar. Namely, both bi-layer optical waveplates simultaneously provided high optical retardation and a reversed dispersion. Further, the haze in both examples was low. Hence, this example shows that optical waveplates with a reversed dispersion can be prepared by a coating process.


Example 9
Comparative

This example shows the optical retardation and dispersion of a film prepared by solvent blending and casting.


A single solution comprising two cellulose esters was prepared according to the general solution preparation process. The cellulose esters in the solution were the same as those in Example 6:



















Total solids
24
g










Cellulose ester A
2.16 g or 4.32 g of a randomly




substituted cellulose acetate




propionate (DSAc = 1.49,




DSPr = 1.44, DSOH = 0.07)



Cellulose ester B
19.44 g or 17.28 g of a randomly




substituted cellulose acetate




propionate (DSAc = 0.14,




DSPr = 1.71, DSOH = 1.15)



Plasticizer
2.4 g Triphenyl phosphate











Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution was used to obtain single-layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially or simultaneous biaxially stretched under different stretching conditions. The stretching conditions and optical and film data of these films are listed in Table 9.









TABLE 9







Optical retardation and dispersion of film prepared by solvent blending and casting.





















Stretch






Film




Ester A

Temp.
Re
Rth




Thickness
Haze


Run
(wt %)
MD × TD
(° C.)
(nm)
(nm)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(micron)
(%)





















49
10
1.00 × 1.30
165
88.74
−277.78
0.984
1.009
1.010
0.983
60
3.78


50

1.00 × 1.27
165
89.63
−286.97
0.983
1.009
1.013
0.981
76
4.5


51

1.00 × 1.27
165
95.23
−315.38
0.984
1.008
1.036
0.964
76
5.67


52

1.00 × 1.30
170
83.44
−242.84
0.984
1.009
1.012
0.983
58
4.52


53
20
1.00 × 1.35
165
88.46
−297.08
0.977
1.010
1.108
0.909
62
13.61


54

1.00 × 1.40
170
96.47
−279.68
0.977
1.012
1.108
0.907
60
13.4


55

1.00 × 1.35
165
88.43
−296.38
0.976
1.013
1.110
0.906
60
12.81









Similar to Examples 6 and 8, the Re and Rth of these single-layer blended films showed an additive effect. However, the film haze was much higher in this example than in Examples 6 and 8. The higher film haze would not be acceptable in LCDs where clarity is important. The higher haze in this example is believed to be a result of the two cellulose esters being incompatible as a blend.


This example also illustrates that it is not necessary to intimately blend the two cellulose esters in order to obtain the Re and Rth additive effect. Discrete layers formed by co-casting or coating processes without specific orientation with respect to each layer can lead to the same Re and Rth additive effect. By having discrete layers, issues such as incompatibility can be avoided.


Example 10

This example shows the optical retardation and dispersion of a tri-layer optical waveplate prepared by solvent co-casting.


A randomly (RDS: C6=0.92, C3=1.00, C2=0.96) substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=1.49, DSPr=1.44, DSOH=0.07) was used to prepare the following solution for layer A for Example 10:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g










Plasticizer
2.4 g Xylitol Pentaacetate











Total solvent
276
g



Methylene chloride
240.12
g



Methanol
35.88
g










A randomly (RDS: C6=0.55, C3=0.69, C2=0.68) substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=1.41, DSPr=0.61, DSOH=0.98) was used to prepare the following solution for layer B for Example 10:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g










Plasticizer
2.4 g Triphenyl phosphate











Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general procedure for solution preparation, solutions for layers A and B were independently prepared. The solution for layer A was first cast on a glass plate with a doctor blade at a certain thickness and covered by a pan for 4 minutes. The solution for layer B was then cast on top of the layer A and covered by a pan for 4 minutes. Then a third layer using solution A was cast on top of the layer B and covered by a pan for 45 minutes. The cover pan was removed and the tri-layer film was left on the glass plate for an additional 15 minutes. The film was peeled from the glass plate then annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively. Films made in this manner were uniaxially or simultaneous biaxially stretched under different stretching conditions. The stretching conditions and optical and film data of these films are listed in Table 10.









TABLE 10







Optical retardation and dispersion of a tri-layer


optical waveplate prepared by solvent co-casting.


















Stretch






Film




Temp.
Re
Rth




Thickness


Run
MD × TD
(° C.)
(nm)
(nm)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(micron)



















56
1.00 × 1.30
180
64.19
−85.87
0.945
1.031
0.927
1.059
126


57
1.00 × 1.40
180
116.18
−227.82
0.946
1.030
0.956
1.030
128


58
1.00 × 1.35
180
83.61
−183.41
0.943
1.032
0.953
1.034
102









The cellulose ester used in layer B in this example was similar to the cellulose ester of Example 1 in that as a single-layer film the cellulose ester exhibited large positive values for Re and large negative values for Rth, but the film exhibited a flat dispersion. As shown in Example 2, as a single-layer film, the cellulose ester used to make layer A exhibited negative Re values and positive Rth values, and the film exhibited a normal dispersion. Similar to Example 7, when the two cellulose esters here were used to construct a tri-layer optical waveplate, the Re and Rth values of the two cellulose esters were additive. In addition, the tri-layer optical waveplate simultaneously provided high optical retardation and a reversed dispersion.


Comparing the data in Table 10 to those in Table 7, it can be seen that the values for ARe and BRe as well as for ARth and BRth in this example were closer to those of an ideal achromatic waveplate. This example illustrates that the cellulose ester in each layer is a factor in constructing optical waveplates.


Example 11

This example shows the optical retardation and dispersion of a tri-layer optical waveplate prepared by solvent co-casting.


A regioselectively (RDS: C6=1.00, C3=0.68, C2=0.84) substituted cellulose benzoate propionate in which the benzoate was primarily located on C2 and C3 (DSBs=0.29, DSPr=2.26, DSOH=0.45) (which was prepared according to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/539,817) was used to prepare the following solution for layer A for Example 11:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g










Plasticizer
2.4 g Triphenyl phosphate











Total solvent
276
g



Methylene chloride
240.12
g



Methanol
35.88
g










A randomly (RDS: C6=0.55, C3=0.69, C2=0.68) substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=1.41, DSPr=0.61, DSOH=0.98) was used to prepare the following solution for layer B for Example 11:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g










Plasticizer
2.4 g Triphenyl phosphate











Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general procedure for solution preparation, solutions for layers A and B were independently prepared. The solution for layer A was first cast on a glass plate with a doctor blade at a certain thickness and covered by a pan for 4 minutes. The solution for layer B was then cast on top of the layer A and covered by a pan for 4 minutes. Then a third layer using solution A was cast on top of the layer B and covered by a pan for 45 minutes. The cover pan was removed and the tri-layer film was left on the glass plate for an additional 15 minutes. The film was peeled from the glass plate then annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively. Films made in this manner were uniaxially or simultaneous biaxially stretched under different stretching conditions. The stretching conditions and optical and film data of these films are listed in Table 11.









TABLE 11







Optical retardation and dispersion of a tri-layer


optical waveplate prepared by solvent co-casting.


















Stretch






Film




Temp.
Re
Rth




Thickness


Run
MD × TD
(° C.)
(nm)
(nm)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(micron)



















59
1.00 × 1.25
180
70.72
−309.59
0.936
1.031
0.971
1.017
102


60
1.00 × 1.30
180
92.13
−314.29
0.930
1.033
0.971
1.018
104


61
1.00 × 1.30
180
87.60
−292.64
0.933
1.035
0.971
1.019
98


62
1.00 × 1.35
180
98.41
−297.14
0.925
1.038
0.967
1.021
102









The cellulose ester used in layer B of this example was the same cellulose ester used in Example 10, and it is similar to the cellulose ester of Example 1 in that as a single-layer film, the cellulose ester exhibited large positive values for Re and large negative values for Rth, but the film exhibited a flat dispersion. As shown in Example 3, as a single-layer film, the cellulose ester used to make layer A exhibited negative Re values and positive or negative Rth values depending upon stretching conditions and the film exhibited a normal dispersion. Similar to Examples 7 and 10, when the two cellulose esters here were used to construct a tri-layer optical waveplate, the Re and Rth values of the two cellulose esters were additive.


Comparing the data in Table 11 with those in Table 10, it can be seen that larger Rth values were obtained in this example. The values for ARe and BRe as well as for ARth and BRth in this example indicate that the optical waveplate exhibited a reversed dispersion with a slope different from that found in Example 10. This example illustrates that the cellulose ester of each layer is a factor in constructing optical waveplates.


Example 12

This example shows the optical retardation and dispersion of a tri-layer optical waveplate prepared by solvent co-casting.


A randomly (RDS: C6=0.92, C3=1.00, C2=0.96) substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=1.49, DSPr=1.44, DSOH=0.07) was used to prepare the following solution for layer A for Example 12:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g










Plasticizer
2.4 g Xylitol Pentaacetate











Total solvent
276
g



Methylene chloride
240.12
g



Methanol
35.88
g










A randomly (RDS: C6=0.61, C3=0.72, C2=0.74) substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=1.24, DSPr=0.95, DSOH=0.81) was used to prepare the following solution for layer B for Example 12:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g










Plasticizer
2.4 g Triphenyl phosphate











Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general procedure for solution preparation, solutions for layers A and B were independently prepared. The solution for layer A was first cast on a glass plate with a doctor blade at a certain thickness and covered by a pan for 4 minutes. The solution for layer B was then cast on top of the layer A and covered by a pan for 4 minutes. Then a third layer using solution A was cast on top of the layer B and covered by a pan for 45 minutes. The cover pan was removed and the tri-layer film was left on the glass plate for an additional 15 minutes. The film was peeled from the glass plate then annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively. Films made in this manner were uniaxially or simultaneous biaxially stretched under different stretching conditions. The stretching conditions and optical and film data of these films are listed in Table 12.









TABLE 12







Optical retardation and dispersion of a tri-layer


optical waveplate prepared by solvent co-casting.


















Stretch






Film




Temp.
Re
Rth




Thickness


Run
MD × TD
(° C.)
(nm)
(nm)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(micron)



















63
1.00 × 1.40
177
65.90
−144.63
0.936
1.037
0.943
1.043
102


64
1.00 × 1.50
177
82.34
−144.90
0.930
1.037
0.940
1.044
94


65
1.00 × 1.40
180
62.98
−125.11
0.939
1.033
0.938
1.050
98


66
1.00 × 1.50
180
71.68
−129.04
0.941
1.034
0.938
1.047
94









The cellulose ester used in layer B of this example was similar to the cellulose ester of Example 1 in that as a single-layer film, the cellulose ester exhibited large positive values for Re and large negative values for Rth, but the film exhibited a flat dispersion. As shown in Example 2, as a single-layer film, the cellulose ester used to make layer A exhibited negative Re values and positive Rth values, and the film exhibited a normal dispersion. Layer A in this example was the same as that used in Example 10. Similar to Example 10, when the cellulose esters here were used to construct a tri-layer optical waveplate, the Re and Rth values of the two cellulose esters were additive.


In this example, the tri-layer optical waveplate simultaneously provided high optical retardation and a reversed dispersion. Comparing the data in Table 12 with those in Table 10, it can be seen that the values for ARe and BRe in this example indicate that the dispersion was more reversed relative to Example 10. This example illustrates that the cellulose ester for each layer is a factor in constructing optical waveplates with desired optical retardation and a reversed dispersion.


Example 13

This example shows the optical retardation and dispersion of a tri-layer optical waveplate prepared by solvent co-casting.


A regioselectively (RDS: C6=1.00, C3=0.68, C2=0.84) substituted cellulose benzoate propionate in which the benzoate was primarily located on C2 and C3 (DSBz=0.29, DSPr=2.26, DSOH=0.45), prepared according to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/539,817, was used to prepare the following solution for layer A for Example 13:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g










Plasticizer
2.4 g Triphenyl phosphate











Total solvent
276
g



Methylene chloride
240.12
g



Methanol
35.88
g










A randomly (RDS: C6=0.61, C3=0.72, C2=0.74) substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=1.24, DSPr=0.95, DSOH=0.81) was used to prepare the following solution for layer B for Example 13:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g










Plasticizer
2.4 g Triphenyl phosphate











Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general procedure for solution preparation, solutions for layers A and B were independently prepared. The solution for layer A was first cast on a glass plate with a doctor blade at a certain thickness and covered by a pan for 4 minutes. The solution for layer B was then cast on top of the layer A and covered by a pan for 4 minutes. Then a third layer using solution A was cast on top of the layer B and covered by a pan for 45 minutes. The cover pan was removed and the tri-layer film was left on the glass plate for an additional 15 minutes. The film was peeled from the glass plate then annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively. Films made in this manner were uniaxially or simultaneous biaxially stretched under different stretching conditions. The stretching conditions and optical and film data of these films are listed in Table 13.









TABLE 13







Optical retardation and dispersion of a tri-layer


optical waveplate prepared by solvent co-casting.


















Stretch






Film




Temp.
Re
Rth




Thickness


Run
MD × TD
(° C.)
(nm)
(nm)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(micron)



















67
1.00 × 1.40
177
64.07
−242.78
0.865
1.070
0.958
1.030
96


68
1.00 × 1.40
180
70.28
−261.71
0.898
1.052
0.956
1.028
100


69
1.00 × 1.45
180
75.19
−242.92
0.872
1.066
0.955
1.032
100









The cellulose ester used in layer B of this example was the same cellulose ester used in Example 12 and it was similar to the cellulose ester of Example 1 in that as a single-layer film, the cellulose ester exhibited large positive values for Re and large negative values for Rth, but the film exhibited a flat dispersion. As shown in Example 3, as a single-layer film, the cellulose ester used to make layer A exhibited negative Re values and positive or negative Rth values depending upon stretching conditions and the film exhibited a normal dispersion. Similar to Example 12, when the cellulose esters here were used to construct a tri-layer optical waveplate, the Re and Rth values of the two cellulose esters were additive.


Comparing the data in Table 13 with those in Table 12, it can be seen that larger absolute Rth values were obtained in this example. The values for ARe and BRe in this example indicate that the optical waveplate exhibited a reversed dispersion that is very close to that of an ideal achromatic waveplate (ARe=ARth=0.818 and BRe=BRth=1.182). This example illustrates that the cellulose ester of each layer is a factor in constructing optical waveplates. In this case, substitution of the regioselective substituted cellulose benzoate propionate in layer A for the randomly substituted CAP of Example 12 significantly altered the Rth, ARe, and BRe values.


Examples 70-112
Optical Retardation and Dispersion of Uniaxially Stretched Film

Following the general solution preparation, a randomly substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=0.14, DSPr=1.71, DSOH=1.15) was used to prepare the following solution for Example 1:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g










Plasticizer
2.4 g triphenyl phosphate (TPP)











Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 70-112 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 14.









TABLE 14







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate propionate film


(DSAc = 0.14, DSPr = 1.71, DSOH = 1.15) with TPP.

















Re(589)
Rth(589)
Thickness




Stretch
Stretch


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
Temp (C.)
Ratio



















70
105.11
−207.42
50
0.996
1.004
0.988
1.001
180
1 × 1.4 


71
130.05
−200.39
47
0.996
1.003
0.984
1.006
180
1 × 1.5 


72
137.57
−195.50
46
0.996
1.003
0.990
1.004
180
1 × 1.55


73
112.23
−201.80
48
0.996
1.004
0.995
1.004
180
1 × 1.45


74
106.94
−181.26
44
0.997
1.002
0.992
1.002
185
1 × 1.5 


75
120.08
−179.60
46
0.996
1.002
0.990
1.006
185
1 × 1.55


76
121.84
−181.69
46
0.996
1.003
0.989
1.005
185
1 × 1.55


77
129.37
−177.99
45
0.996
1.002
0.990
1.008
185
1 × 1.6 


78
144.10
−182.79
47
0.997
1.002
0.997
0.994
185
1 × 1.65


79
118.85
−149.96
46
0.996
1.002
0.990
1.006
190
1 × 1.65


80
122.53
−147.39
44
0.996
1.004
0.987
1.004
190
1 × 1.7 


81
135.15
−221.12
50
0.996
1.003
0.989
1.004
180
1 × 1.5 


82
144.35
−216.48
49
0.996
1.003
0.991
1.005
180
1 × 1.55


83
145.56
−212.19
49
0.996
1.002
0.984
1.000
180
1 × 1.55


84
163.25
−219.39
50
0.996
1.003
0.993
0.997
180
1 × 1.6 


85
123.92
−185.92
49
0.996
1.003
0.985
1.000
185
1 × 1.55


86
132.63
−183.69
47
0.997
1.004
0.987
1.007
185
1 × 1.6 


87
142.08
−181.07
46
0.996
1.002
0.997
0.998
185
1 × 1.65


88
122.30
−170.42
50
0.997
1.003
0.990
1.002
190
1 × 1.65


89
126.77
−154.14
46
0.996
1.003
0.988
1.003
190
1 × 1.70


90
136.55
−153.47
45
0.997
1.003
0.982
1.001
190
1 × 1.75


91
133.99
−148.52
43
0.997
1.002
1.000
1.000
190
1 × 1.8 


92
144.87
−229.59
54
0.996
1.003
0.994
1.006
180
1 × 1.5 


93
146.79
−224.97
52
0.996
1.004
0.990
1.007
180
1 × 1.55


94
163.19
−221.34
52
0.996
1.002
0.996
1.001
180
1 × 1.6 


95
126.08
−216.47
56
0.996
1.005
0.998
1.004
180
1 × 1.45


96
135.77
−202.20
52
0.996
1.003
0.992
1.004
185
1 × 1.55


97
140.67
−197.17
49
0.996
1.003
0.992
1.005
185
1 × 1.6 


98
155.19
−199.85
48
0.996
1.001
0.998
0.992
185
1 × 1.65


99
166.74
−203.45
47
0.997
1.001
1.010
0.982
185
1 × 1.7 


100
132.24
−170.71
50
0.997
1.002
0.992
1.005
190
1 × 1.65


101
148.28
−161.37
47
0.997
1.002
0.990
1.003
190
1 × 1.7 


102
138.58
−167.34
46
0.996
1.002
0.987
0.999
190
1 × 1.75


103
143.44
−160.76
46
0.997
1.003
0.997
0.992
190
1 × 1.8 


104
165.84
−157.12
52
0.996
1.001
1.034
0.954
190
1 × 1.95


105
170.00
−156.93
48
0.997
1.002
1.059
0.945
190
1 × 2.0 


106
165.85
−191.40
60
0.996
1.001
0.990
0.999
190
1 × 1.75


107
149.20
−163.97
45
0.996
1.002
0.986
0.995
190
1 × 1.8 


108
164.00
−160.76
43
0.996
1.001
1.021
0.981
190
1 × 1.9 


109
259.64
−132.47
96
0.996
1.001
0.994
1.003
185
1 × 1.45


110
375.86
NA
96
0.996
1.002
NA
NA
185
1 × 1.50


111
308.40
−162.67
88
0.995
1.001
0.989
1.002
185
1 × 1.55


112
310.00
−160.34
88
0.995
1.001
0.989
1.002
185
1 × 1.60









Examples 70-108 are constrained and examples 109-112 are not constrained.


Relative to an ideal achromatic waveplate in which ARe=ARth=0.818 and BRe=BRth=1.182, the data in Table 14 indicate that the films exhibit only a slight reverse dispersion. That is, the dispersion curves obtained with these films essentially are flat.


Examples 113-138
Optical Retardation and Dispersion of Uniaxially Stretched Film

Following the general solution preparation, a randomly substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=0.14, DSPr=1.71, DSOH=1.15) was used to prepare the following solution for Examples 114-:
















Total solids
24
g


Cellulose ester
21.6
g








Plasticizer
2.4 g Trimethyl Pentanyl Diisobutyrate(TXIB)









Total solvent
176
g


Methylene chloride
153.12
g


Methanol
22.88
g









Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Example 2 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 2.









TABLE 15







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate propionate film


(DSAc = 0.14, DSPr = 1.71, DSOH = 1.15) with TXIB.

















Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Stretch
Stretch Ratio


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
Temp (C.)
MD × TD



















113
82.16
−175.89
49
0.985
1.005
0.995
1.007
178
1 × 1.40


114
87.57
− 182.94
48
0.985
1.005
0.991
1.002
178
1 × 1.45


115
97.61
− 187.67
48
0.985
1.006
0.990
1.001
178
1 × 1.50


116
108.65
− 192.26
47
0.985
1.007
0.997
0.998
178
1 × 1.55


117
117.66
− 200.04
50
0.985
1.007
1.008
0.987
178
1 × 1.60


118
132.20
− 200.90
52
0.985
1.006
1.018
0.976
178
1 × 1.65


119
96.35
− 203.83
54
0.985
1.006
0.988
0.999
178
1 × 1.45


120
110.50
− 207.82
54
0.986
1.005
0.992
1.001
178
1 × 1.50


121
115.58
− 200.88
52
0.985
1.005
0.992
0.997
178
1 × 1.55


122
122.76
− 215.89
56
0.986
1.005
0.991
1.002
178
1 × 1.50


123
132.53
− 239.12
56
0.986
1.006
0.991
1.000
178
1 × 1.50


124
115.57
− 210.77
58
0.985
1.005
0.992
1.002
178
1 × 1.50


125
114.89
− 211.82
56
0.986
1.006
0.989
1.002
178
1 × 1.50


126
120.79
− 228.44
56
0.986
1.006
0.991
1.001
178
1 × 1.50


127
128.82
− 214.20
56
0.986
1.005
0.983
0.998
178
1 × 1.55


128
132.03
− 221.51
56
0.986
1.006
0.995
0.999
178
1 × 1.60


129
175.18
− 252.72
56
0.987
1.005
1.051
0.944
178
1 × 1.65


130
125.99
− 219.40
54
0.985
1.006
1.025
0.966
178
1 × 1.60


131
198.88
− 128.08
84
0.990
1.003
0.990
1.004
175
1 × 1.11


132
228.87
− 134.05
84
0.990
1.003
0.987
1.006
175
1 × 1.15


133
238.02
− 137.21
78
0.991
1.003
0.985
1.007
175
1 × 1.2 


134
262.30
− 151.23
76
0.990
1.003
0.985
1.008
175
1 × 1.25


135
283.24
− 166.63
74
0.989
1.003
0.989
1.006
175
1 × 1.3 


136
289.19
− 169.95
72
0.988
1.003
0.987
1.007
175
1 × 1.35


137
304.52
− 171.98
76
0.988
1.003
0.984
1.010
175
× 1 × .4


138
312.54
− 217.77
68
0.987
1.005
0.990
1.003
175
1 × 1.5 









Examples 113-130 are constrained and examples 131-138 are not constrained.


The only difference between Examples 70-112 and Examples 113-138 is plasticizer TPP and TXIB. Because of the plasticizer effect, the wave plate dispersion from Example 113-138 is more reversed than Examples 70-112, which are relatively flat.


Examples 139-145
Optical Retardation and Dispersion of Uniaxially Stretched Film

Following the general solution preparation, a randomly substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=1.24, DSPr=0.95, DSOH=0.81) was used to prepare the following solution for Example 3:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g










Plasticizer
2.4 g triphenyl phosphate (TPP)











Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 139-145 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 16.









TABLE 16







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


propionate film (DSAc = 1.24, DSPr = 0.95, DSOH = 0.81) with TPP.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
MD × TD



















139
251.64
−242.21
90
0.974
1.012
0.977
1.014
170
1 × 1.2


140
91.70
−248.56
68
0.973
1.014
0.989
1.002
170
1 × 1.3


141
282.33
−177.55
94
0.977
1.011
0.976
1.015
172
 1 × 1.35


142
270.26
−191.33
82
0.976
1.012
0.978
1.014
172
1 × 1.3


143
239.77
−143.41
96
0.978
1.010
0.980
1.014
170
1 × 1.3


144
196.29
−116.63
104
0.980
1.011
0.976
1.015
175
1 × 1.1


145
108.03
−256.07
74
0.975
1.015
0.977
1.014
175
 1 × 1.35









Examples 140 and 145 are constrained and examples 139 and 141-144 are not constrained.


Examples 146-156
Optical Retardation and Dispersion of Uniaxially Stretched Film

Following the general solution preparation, a randomly substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=0.53, DSPr=1.46, DSOH=1.01) was used to prepare the following solution for Examples 147-:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g










Plasticizer
2.4 g triphenyl phosphate (TPP)











Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 146-156 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 17.









TABLE 17







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


propionate film (DSAc = 0.53, DSPr = 1.46, DSOH = 1.01) with TPP.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
MD × TD





146
211.25
−144.08
92
0.993
1.003
0.991
1.003
170
1 × 1.1


147
366.47
NA
78
0.990
1.003
NA
NA
172
1 × 1.5


148
260.16
−169.71
84
0.991
1.002
0.991
1.004
170
1 × 1.2


149
337.65
NA
78
0.990
1.004
NA
NA
172
1 × 1.4


150
137.83
−278.88
64
0.989
1.004
0.995
0.998
172
1 × 1.4


151
376.10
NA
90
0.990
1.003
NA
NA
170
1 × 1.4


152
152.30
−254.15
58
0.989
1.005
0.996
0.997
172
 1 × 1.45


153
331.50
NA
86
0.991
1.003
NA
NA
172
1 × 1.3


154
209.69
−127.70
94
0.992
1.002
0.990
1.002
172
1 × 1.1


155
274.77
−168.35
90
0.991
1.002
0.989
1.006
172
1 × 1.2


156
151.09
−299.90
64
0.989
1.006
0.998
0.997
170
1 × 1.4









Examples 150, 152 and 156 are constrained and examples 146-149, 151 and 153-155 are not constrained.


Examples 157-169
Optical Retardation and Dispersion of Uniaxially Stretched Film

Following the general solution preparation, a randomly substituted cellulose acetate propionate (DSAc=1.41, DSPr=0.61, DSOH=0.98) was used to prepare the following solution for Example 5:



















Total solids
24
g



Cellulose ester
21.6
g



Plasticizer
2.4
g triphenyl phosphate (TPP)



Total solvent
176
g



Methylene chloride
153.12
g



Methanol
22.88
g










Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples −169 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 18.









TABLE 18







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


propionate film (DSAc = 1.41, DSPr = 0.61, DSOH = 0.98) with TPP.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re(589)
Rth(589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio MD ×


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
TD



















157
58.96
−238.89
70
0.990
1.004
0.990
1.004
170
1 × 1.1


158
153.15
−260.02
62
0.988
1.005
0.992
1.000
170
1 × 1.2


159
205.39
−270.97
60
0.987
1.004
1.003
0.993
170
1 × 1.3


160
125.47
−412.16
80
0.985
1.007
1.004
0.992
172
1 × 1.3


161
54.76
−348.03
72
0.985
1.003
0.993
1.001
172
1 × 1.35


162
121.78
−384.26
70
0.985
1.006
1.002
0.994
172
1 × 1.3


163
129.27
−369.92
72
0.984
1.006
1.002
0.995
175
1 × 1.32


164
120.43
−405.60
70
0.985
1.005
0.999
0.994
170
1 × 1.3


165
167.82
−278.59
90
0.989
1.004
0.994
0.999
175
1 × 1.1


166
39.54
−323.39
74
0.987
1.007
0.993
1.000
175
1 × 1.35


167
243.78
−287.04
84
0.989
1.004
0.992
1.002
175
1 × 1.2


168
327.08
−337.81
80
0.989
1.004
0.992
1.002
175
1 × 1.4


169
316.48
−309.32
84
0.988
1.004
0.993
1.001
175
1 × 1.3









Examples 160-164 and 166 are constrained and examples 157-159, 165 and 167-169 are not constrained.


Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 170-174 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 19.
















Total solids
48.0
g


Cellulose ester
43.2
g


Plasticizer
2.4
g 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol (TXIB)


Plasticizer
2.4
g 2-naphthyl benzoate


Total solvent
352
g


Methylene chloride
316.8
g


Methanol
35.20
g
















TABLE 19







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


propionate film (DSAc = 1.90, DSPr = 0.72, DSOH = 0.38) with TXIB and


2-naphthyl benzoate.

























Stretch










Stretch
Ratio



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
MD ×


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
TD



















170
133.84
−105.89
76
0.969
1.024
0.970
1.025
160
1 × 1.40


171
128.79
−101.96
78
0.969
1.023
0.968
1.029
160
1 × 1.35


172
122.81
−106.74
76
0.970
1.023
0.968
1.029
160
1 × 1.30


173
125.54
−89.72
76
0.966
1.026
0.963
1.033
165
1 × 1.30


174
120.33
−91.34
74
0.967
1.024
0.964
1.031
165
1 × 1.25









Examples 170-174 are not constrained.


Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 175-178 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 20.
















Total solids
48.0
g


Cellulose ester
43.2
g


Plasticizer
1.92
g 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol (TXIB)


Plasticizer
2.88
g 2-naphthyl benzoate


Total solvent
352
g


Methylene chloride
316.8
g


Methanol
35.20
g
















TABLE 20







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


propionate film (DSAc = 1.90, DSPr = 0.72, DSOH = 0.38) with TXIB and


2-naphthyl benzoate.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
MD × TD





175
121.39
−81.82
76
0.936
1.039
0.940
1.051
165
1 × 1.40


176
109.25
−75.75
78
0.935
1.041
0.940
1.051
165
1 × 1.35


177
107.93
−72.46
80
0.937
1.040
0.938
1.053
165
1 × 1.30


178
120.93
−81.21
72
0.937
1.039
0.939
1.052
165
1 × 1.40









Examples 175-178 are not constrained.


Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 179-185 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 21.
















Total solids
48.0
g


Cellulose ester
43.2
g


Plasticizer
1.44
g 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol (TXIB)


Plasticizer
3.36
g 2-naphthyl benzoate


Total solvent
352
g


Methylene chloride
316.8
g


Methanol
35.20
g
















TABLE 21







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


propionate film (DSAc = 1.90, DSPr = 0.72, DSOH = 0.38) with TXIB and


2-naphthyl benzoate.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C)
MD × TD



















179
94.99
−64.49
78
0.892
1.063
0.909
1.079
165
1 × 1.35


180
93.74
−68.36
74
0.895
1.062
0.914
1.073
165
1 × 1.40


181
99.08
−63.24
78
0.892
1.063
0.902
1.083
165
1 × 1.35


182
105.78
−68.09
76
0.893
1.062
0.905
1.080
165
1 × 1.45


183
107.91
−69.46
74
0.890
1.064
0.903
1.082
165
1 × 1.50


184
110.14
−70.34
72
0.894
1.063
0.905
1.080
165
1 × 1.55


185
109.50
−67.42
74
0.888
1.065
0.900
1.084
165
1 × 1.40









Examples 179-185 are not constrained.


Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 186-200 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 22.
















Total solids
52.8
g


Cellulose ester
48.0
g


Plasticizer
2.40
g 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol (TXIB)


Plasticizer
2.40
g 2-naphthyl benzoate


Total solvent
352
g


Methylene chloride
316.8
g


Methanol
35.20
g
















TABLE 22







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


propionate film (DSAc = 1.58, DSPr = 0.85, DSOH = 0.57) with TXIB and


2-naphthyl benzoate.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
MD × TD



















186
92.29
−151.85
58
1.002
1.004
1.001
1.000
175
1 × 1.40


187
87.37
−144.81
46
0.999
1.005
0.995
0.997
175
1 × 1.45


188
92.05
−147.76
47
1.000
1.007
0.991
0.991
175
1 × 1.50


189
219.98
−117.70
84
1.007
0.999
1.003
1.003
175
1 × 1.20


190
251.06
−130.36
82
1.007
1.000
1.001
1.001
175
1 × 1.30


191
266.77
−141.47
78
1.007
1.000
1.001
1.003
175
1 × 1.35


192
262.53
−137.51
80
1.005
1.001
0.991
1.004
175
1 × 1.40


193
188.34
−103.66
86
1.007
0.998
1.002
1.003
175
1 × 1.10


194
129.80
−69.53
84
1.006
1.000
0.980
1.010
180
1 × 1.10


195
171.33
−88.11
84
1.004
1.000
0.994
1.007
180
1 × 1.20


196
186.93
−95.87
82
1.003
1.001
0.997
1.005
180
1 × 1.30


197
214.89
−110.58
78
1.004
1.000
1.000
1.005
180
1 × 1.40


198
95.52
−126.79
58
1.001
1.005
0.997
1.001
180
1 × 1.50


199
87.98
−126.18
50
1.000
1.006
0.997
1.001
180
1 × 1.60


200
79.96
−104.35
42
0.993
1.010
1.027
0.965
180
1 × 1.70









Examples 186-188 and 198-200 are constrained and examples 189-197 are not constrained.


Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 201-215 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 23.
















Total solids
52.8
g


Cellulose ester
43.2
g


Plasticizer
1.92
g 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol (TXIB)


Plasticizer
2.88
g 2-naphthyl benzoate


Total solvent
352
g


Methylene chloride
316.8
g


Methanol
35.20
g
















TABLE 23







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


propionate film (DSAc = 1.58, DSPr = 0.85, DSOH = 0.57) with TXIB and


2-naphthyl benzoate.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio MD ×


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
TD



















201
183.27
−97.92
86
0.992
1.005
0.990
1.009
175
1 × 1.10


202
193.86
−102.90
84
0.992
1.005
0.988
1.012
175
1 × 1.20


203
256.07
−135.54
84
0.992
1.007
0.990
1.010
175
1 × 1.30


204
238.81
−125.97
78
0.990
1.006
0.991
1.010
175
1 × 1.40


205
287.25
−160.35
72
0.991
1.008
0.946
1.026
175
1 × 1.60


206
274.21
−160.52
68
0.987
1.010
0.932
1.003
175
1 × 1.80


207
125.40
−68.69
86
0.994
1.005
0.979
1.012
180
1 × 1.10


208
180.04
−95.53
84
0.992
1.005
0.989
1.013
180
1 × 1.20


209
182.80
−99.59
82
0.993
1.005
0.987
1.013
180
1 × 1.30


210
202.76
−106.16
78
0.992
1.006
0.986
1.013
180
1 × 1.40


211
221.23
−115.96
74
0.990
1.006
0.986
1.008
180
1 × 1.60


212
238.60
−135.74
66
0.988
1.008
0.925
1.010
180
1 × 1.80


213
74.50
−118.25
56
0.989
1.012
0.990
1.006
180
1 × 1.50


214
85.97
−127.06
52
0.984
1.012
0.995
1.000
180
1 × 1.60


215
87.20
−112.41
48
0.981
1.012
0.997
1.000
180
1 × 1.70









Examples 201-212 are constrained and examples 213-215 are not constrained.


Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 216-230 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 24.
















Total solids
52.8
g


Cellulose ester
43.2
g


Plasticizer
1.44
g 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol (TXIB)


Plasticizer
2.36
g 2-naphthyl benzoate


Total solvent
352
g


Methylene chloride
316.8
g


Methanol
35.20
g
















TABLE 24







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


propionate film (DSAc = 1.58, DSPr = 0.85, DSOH = 0.57) with TXIB and


2-naphthyl benzoate.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio MD ×


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
TD



















216
158.42
−83.62
86
0.977
1.012
0.967
1.020
175
1 × 1.10


217
173.42
−90.71
86
0.975
1.012
0.971
1.022
175
1 × 1.20


218
202.54
−105.94
82
0.974
1.013
0.974
1.022
175
1 × 1.30


219
216.11
−113.55
76
0.973
1.013
0.977
1.021
175
1 × 1.40


220
241.30
−126.32
72
0.972
1.015
0.970
1.021
175
1 × 1.60


221
252.99
−142.79
68
0.969
1.017
0.935
1.019
175
1 × 1.80


222
69.82
−121.46
58
0.969
1.020
0.979
1.014
175
1 × 1.40


223
124.19
−67.29
86
0.978
1.012
0.965
1.021
180
1 × 1.10


224
163.57
−86.10
84
0.976
1.012
0.966
1.024
180
1 × 1.20


225
174.44
−90.87
82
0.974
1.012
0.967
1.025
180
1 × 1.30


226
194.23
−103.64
76
0.973
1.013
0.975
1.023
180
1 × 1.40


227
230.94
−117.91
72
0.972
1.014
0.973
1.021
180
1 × 1.60


228
67.57
−109.32
52
0.966
1.024
0.974
1.014
180
1 × 1.50


229
76.91
−105.80
48
0.968
1.022
0.978
1.016
180
1 × 1.60


230
78.10
−114.86
45
0.966
1.023
0.999
0.980
180
1 × 1.70









Examples 222 and 228-230 are constrained and examples 216-221 and 223-227 are not constrained.


Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 231-242 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 25.
















Total solids
52.8
g


Cellulose ester
43.2
g


Plasticizer
0.96
g 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol (TXIB)


Plasticizer
3.84
g 2-naphthyl benzoate


Total solvent
352
g


Methylene chloride
316.8
g


Methanol
35.20
g
















TABLE 25







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


propionate film (DSAc = 1.58, DSPr = 0.85, DSOH = 0.57) with TXIB and


2-naphthyl benzoate.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
MD × TD



















231
134.07
−71.00
86
0.954
1.021
0.944
1.035
175
1 × 1.10


232
158.67
−83.41
84
0.953
1.022
0.949
1.035
175
1 × 1.20


233
204.61
−112.31
84
0.950
1.023
0.954
1.033
175
1 × 1.30


234
206.95
−109.06
82
0.950
1.023
0.955
1.033
175
1 × 1.40


235
225.95
−117.64
74
0.945
1.026
0.946
1.039
175
1 × 1.60


236
224.50
−121.11
70
0.943
1.027
0.931
1.032
175
1 × 1.80


237
100.11
−54.32
86
0.959
1.022
0.954
1.029
180
1 × 1.10


238
167.09
−90.08
86
0.955
1.021
0.953
1.033
180
1 × 1.20


239
146.09
−76.72
82
0.956
1.022
0.947
1.034
180
1 × 1.30


240
205.06
−108.43
80
0.949
1.023
0.954
1.035
180
1 × 1.40


241
170.53
−87.35
74
0.948
1.024
0.945
1.038
180
1 × 1.60


242
215.23
−113.65
68
0.943
1.027
0.934
1.026
180
1 × 1.80









Examples 231-242 are not constrained.


Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 243-256 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 26.
















Total solids
52.8
g


Cellulose ester
43.2
g


Plasticizer
0.48
g 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol (TXIB)


Plasticizer
4.32
g 2-naphthyl benzoate


Total solvent
352
g


Methylene chloride
316.8
g


Methanol
35.20
g
















TABLE 26







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


propionate film (DSAc = 1.58, DSPr = 0.85, DSOH = 0.57) with TXIB and


2-naphthyl benzoate.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
MD × TD



















243
140.03
−77.42
86
0.934
1.031
0.927
1.045
175
1 × 1.10


244
146.71
−77.87
82
0.932
1.031
0.925
1.048
175
1 × 1.20


245
174.36
−91.09
80
0.926
1.033
0.925
1.050
175
1 × 1.30


246
180.62
−93.43
78
0.926
1.034
0.928
1.049
175
1 × 1.40


247
222.70
−115.51
74
0.919
1.037
0.925
1.051
175
1 × 1.60


248
199.32
−103.71
66
0.915
1.039
0.915
1.051
175
1 × 1.80


249
111.23
−58.32
86
0.940
1.030
0.932
1.041
180
1 × 1.10


250
121.61
−63.71
86
0.936
1.031
0.930
1.044
180
1 × 1.20


251
155.72
−81.53
82
0.931
1.030
0.927
1.045
180
1 × 1.30


252
146.88
−78.58
76
0.931
1.031
0.925
1.049
180
1 × 1.40


253
187.23
−96.12
72
0.922
1.036
0.921
1.054
180
1 × 1.60


254
177.27
−92.05
66
0.919
1.037
0.921
1.051
180
1 × 1.80


255
65.09
−105.47
62
0.917
1.043
0.947
1.035
180
1 × 1.50


256
57.33
−82.54
52
0.917
1.043
0.944
1.038
180
1 × 1.60









Examples 243-254 are constrained and examples 255-256 are not constrained.


Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 257-266 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 27.
















Total solids
48.0
g


Cellulose ester
43.2
g


Plasticizer
2.4
g 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol (TXIB)


Plasticizer
2.4
g 2-naphthyl benzoate


Total solvent
352
g


Methylene chloride
316.8
g


Methanol
35.20
g
















TABLE 27







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


butyrate film (DSAc = 2.25, DSBu = 0.21, DSOH = 0.54) with TXIB and 2-


naphthyl benzoate.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
MD × TD





257
253.60
−147.81
78
1.009
0.999
1.008
0.999
175
1 × 1.10


258
252.14
−139.26
80
1.008
1.000
1.006
1.000
180
1 × 1.10


259
270.03
−143.27
82
1.009
1.000
1.000
1.001
180
1 × 1.20


260
189.01
−104.49
84
1.008
0.998
1.003
0.997
185
1 × 1.10


261
230.30
−121.28
84
1.008
0.999
1.000
1.003
185
1 × 1.20


262
108.23
−205.03
54
1.007
1.002
1.010
0.992
175
1 × 1.40


263
108.39
−195.36
50
1.005
1.003
1.023
0.980
175
1 × 1.45


264
101.89
−168.59
47
1.003
1.004
1.022
0.977
180
1 × 1.50


265
112.54
−196.07
42
1.001
1.008
1.118
0.896
180
1 × 1.60


266
166.19
−207.17
56
1.004
1.003
0.997
0.986
180
1 × 1.80









Examples 257-261 are constrained and examples 262-266 are not constrained.


Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 267-277 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 28.
















Total solids
48.0
g


Cellulose ester
43.2
g


Plasticizer
1.92
g 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol (TXIB)


Plasticizer
2.88
g 2-naphthyl benzoate


Total solvent
352
g


Methylene chloride
316.8
g


Methanol
35.20
g
















TABLE 28







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


butyrate film (DSAc = 2.25, DSBu = 0.21, DSOH = 0.54) with TXIB and 2-


naphthyl benzoate.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio MD ×


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
TD



















267
239.07
−131.15
84
0.991
1.007
0.990
1.010
180
1 × 1.10


268
264.48
−139.15
84
0.992
1.007
0.987
1.010
180
1 × 1.20


269
169.86
−88.79
82
0.992
1.006
0.986
1.013
185
1 × 1.10


270
236.82
−123.03
84
0.990
1.006
0.991
1.009
185
1 × 1.20


271
253.54
−130.37
84
0.990
1.007
0.988
1.011
185
1 × 1.30


272
288.46
−147.92
82
0.989
1.009
0.981
1.013
185
1 × 1.40


273
262.81
−135.18
76
0.987
1.009
0.977
1.010
185
1 × 1.60


274
99.13
−186.32
62
0.988
1.009
0.980
1.011
180
1 × 1.40


275
97.83
−167.71
58
0.982
1.014
0.996
0.987
185
1 × 1.60


276
85.86
−130.02
42
0.980
1.016
1.030
0.973
185
1 × 1.70


277
83.65
−142.85
58
0.985
1.013
0.989
1.007
185
1 × 1.50









Examples 267-273 are constrained and examples 274-277 are not constrained.


Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 278-288 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 29.
















Total solids
48.0
g


Cellulose ester
43.2
g


Plasticizer
1.92
g 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol (TXIB)


Plasticizer
2.88
g 2-naphthyl benzoate


Total solvent
352
g


Methylene chloride
316.8
g


Methanol
35.20
g
















TABLE 29







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


butyrate film (DSAc = 2.25, DSBu = 0.21, DSOH = 0.54) with TXIB and 2-


naphthyl benzoate.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio MD ×


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
TD



















278
197.86
−106.67
84
0.975
1.012
0.981
1.013
180
1 × 1.10


279
247.09
−131.27
82
0.974
1.014
0.976
1.019
180
1 × 1.30


280
178.49
−93.43
86
0.974
1.013
0.967
1.025
185
1 × 1.10


281
189.52
−99.20
84
0.975
1.012
0.969
1.022
185
1 × 1.20


282
239.24
−126.20
82
0.972
1.015
0.973
1.023
185
1 × 1.30


283
243.28
−128.16
80
0.974
1.014
0.978
1.020
185
1 × 1.40


284
266.76
−143.26
76
0.970
1.017
0.965
1.024
185
1 × 1.60


285
286.43
−154.83
72
0.968
1.018
0.947
1.025
185
1 × 1.80


286
70.37
−129.61
47
0.968
1.020
0.966
1.015
185
1 × 1.50


287
95.41
−146.78
54
0.972
1.020
0.961
1.010
185
1 × 1.60


288
93.37
−132.20
44
0.971
1.021
0.967
1.011
185
1 × 1.70









Examples 278-285 are constrained and examples 286-288 are not constrained.


Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 289-303 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 30.
















Total solids
48.0
g


Cellulose ester
43.2
g


Plasticizer
1.92
g 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol (TXIB)


Plasticizer
2.88
g 2-naphthyl benzoate


Total solvent
352
g


Methylene chloride
316.8
g


Methanol
35.20
g
















TABLE 30







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


butyrate film (DSAc = 2.25, DSBu = 0.21, DSOH = 0.54) with TXIB and 2-


naphthyl benzoate.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
MD × TD



















289
193.25
−105.94
86
0.951
1.023
0.948
1.036
180
1 × 1.10


290
234.23
−127.35
84
0.950
1.023
0.957
1.034
180
1 × 1.20


291
241.55
−135.48
82
0.953
1.023
0.958
1.032
180
1 × 1.30


292
263.21
−155.36
82
0.952
1.024
0.959
1.031
180
1 × 1.40


293
280.57
−155.02
78
0.949
1.026
0.943
1.036
180
1 × 1.60


294
287.67
−157.92
76
0.946
1.028
0.911
1.053
180
1 × 1.80


295
158.49
−86.52
86
0.959
1.020
0.953
1.032
185
1 × 1.10


296
196.83
−101.94
86
0.954
1.021
0.950
1.036
185
1 × 1.20


297
198.92
−105.41
84
0.953
1.022
0.952
1.035
185
1 × 1.30


298
232.48
−121.33
84
0.953
1.022
0.957
1.031
185
1 × 1.40


199
281.16
−151.21
78
0.953
1.024
0.950
1.030
185
1 × 1.60


300
285.10
−153.23
74
0.946
1.027
0.948
1.032
185
1 × 1.80


301
72.58
−121.31
54
0.945
1.029
0.965
1.021
185
1 × 1.50


302
91.20
−158.00
52
0.941
1.029
0.985
1.002
185
1 × 1.60


303
90.58
−123.29
47
0.943
1.032
0.942
1.014
185
1 × 1.70









Examples 289-300 are constrained and examples 301-303 are not constrained.


Following the general solvent cast procedures described above, the solution for Examples 304-319 was used to obtain single layer films. The films were annealed at 100° C. and 120° C. for 10 minutes, respectively, before they were uniaxially stretched under the different stretching conditions. Some optical data are listed in Table 31.
















Total solids
48.0
g


Cellulose ester
43.2
g


Plasticizer
0.48
g 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol (TXIB)


Plasticizer
4.32
g 2-naphthyl benzoate


Total solvent
352
g


Methylene chloride
316.8
g


Methanol
35.20
g
















TABLE 31







Optical properties for an uniaxial stretched cellulose acetate


butyrate film (DSAc = 2.25, DSBu = 0.21, DSOH = 0.54) with TXIB and 2-


naphthyl benzoate.
























Stretch
Stretch



Re (589)
Rth (589)
Thickness




Temp
Ratio


Entry
(nm)
(nm)
(micron)
ARe
BRe
ARth
BRth
(C.)
MD × TD



















304
186.06
−86.39
86
0.935
1.029
0.891
1.071
180
1 × 1.10


305
192.70
−92.15
84
0.931
1.030
0.874
1.081
180
1 × 1.20


306
216.06
−115.11
78
0.927
1.034
0.916
1.059
180
1 × 1.30


307
223.97
−118.94
78
0.925
1.034
0.929
1.051
180
1 × 1.40


308
261.94
−146.31
70
0.920
1.037
0.925
1.047
180
1 × 1.60


309
257.65
−145.68
66
0.918
1.038
0.926
1.047
180
1 × 1.80


310
91.28
−149.04
56
0.917
1.040
0.946
1.033
180
1 × 1.50


311
169.52
−84.34
86
0.929
1.031
0.904
1.062
185
1 × 1.10


312
177.78
−94.66
80
0.934
1.029
0.931
1.047
185
1 × 1.20


313
231.36
−123.23
82
0.930
1.032
0.940
1.044
185
1 × 1.30


314
208.45
−109.55
76
0.925
1.034
0.931
1.049
185
1 × 1.40


315
246.22
−133.14
72
0.920
1.037
0.919
1.053
185
1 × 1.60


316
207.56
−116.00
64
0.914
1.038
0.932
1.043
185
1 × 1.80


317
67.79
−115.60
48
0.916
1.044
0.947
1.029
185
1 × 1.50


318
60.09
−99.08
40
0.912
1.045
0.954
1.022
185
1 × 1.60


319
70.29
−110.31
41
0.913
1.045
0.966
1.012
185
1 × 1.70









Examples 304-309 and 311-316 are not constrained. Examples 310 and 317-319 are constrained.


The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. An optical waveplate comprising: (a) a layer comprising a mixed cellulose ester having a DSOH of 0.35 to 1.35, a total DSacyl of from about 1.65 to about 2.65,(b) from about 5 to about 20 wt % of a plasticizer,wherein the film has an in-plane retardation (Re) ranging from about 55 to about 400 nm measured at 589 nm and a through-plane retardation (Rth) ranging from about −40 to about −400 nm measured at 589 nm on a film having a thickness of 30 to 120 microns,wherein the film has a stretch ratio ranging from about 1.1 to about 1.80,wherein the film has a reversed optical dispersion, andwherein the mixed cellulose ester has acetate residues and comprises at least one ester residue of an acid chain having 3 or more carbon atoms.
  • 2. The optical waveplate according to claim 1, wherein the film has been annealed and stretched in at least one direction.
  • 3. The optical waveplate according to claim 1, wherein the film is made by solvent casting or melt extrusion.
  • 4. The optical waveplate according to claim 1, wherein the mixed cellulose ester is regioselectively or randomly substituted.
  • 5. The optical waveplate according to claim 1, wherein after stretching in at least one direction has an ARe and ARth of 0.85 to 1.0, and a BRe and BRth of 0.940 to 1.15, measured at a film thickness of 30 to 120 μm.
  • 6. The optical waveplate according to claim 1, wherein after stretching in at least one direction, has an Re(589) of 120 to 300 nm, an Rth(589) of −60 to −280 nm, an ARe and ARth of 0.88 to 0.99, and a BRe and BRth of 1.0 to 1.10, measured at a film thickness of 30 to 120 μm.
  • 7. The optical waveplate according to claim 1, wherein after stretching in at least one direction, has an Re(589) of 140 to 270 nm, an Rth(589) of −70 to −200 nm, an ARe and ARth of 0.93 to 0.98, and a BRe and BRth of 1.0 to 1.06, measured at a film thickness of 30 to 120 μm.
  • 8. The optical waveplate according to claim 1, wherein the mixed cellulose ester comprises cellulose acetate propionate or cellulose acetate butyrate.
  • 9. The optical waveplate according to claim 1, wherein the waveplate has a machine direction (MD) stretch ratio of 1.0 to 2.0.
  • 10. The optical waveplate according to claim 1, wherein the waveplate has a transverse direction (TD) stretch ratio of 1.0 to 1.8.
  • 11. The optical waveplate according to claim 1, wherein the waveplate has a machine direction (MD) stretch ratio of 1.0 to 2.0 and a transverse direction (TD) stretch ratio of 1.0 to 1.5.
  • 12. The optical waveplate according to claim 1, wherein the waveplate has a preheat time of 10 to 300 seconds from 130° C. to about 200° C.
  • 13. The optical waveplate according to claim 1, wherein the stretch temperature ranges from about 130° C. to about 200° C.
  • 14. The optical waveplate according to claim 13, wherein the preheat temperature is the same as a stretch temperature.
  • 15. The optical waveplate according to claim 1, wherein the plasticizer comprises triphenyl phosphate, xylitol pentaacetate, trimethyl pentanoyl diisobutyrate, 2-naphthyl benzoate or mixtures thereof.
  • 16. The optical waveplate according to claim 8, wherein the degree of substitution of hydroxyl (DSOH) ranges from about 0.35 to about 1.35, the degree of substitution of acetate (DSAc) ranges from about 0.10 to about 1.5 and the degree of substitution of propionate (DSPr) ranges from about 0.60 to about 1.75, and degree of substitution of butyrate (DSBu) ranges from about 0.2 to about 1.70.
CROSS REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 13/157,580, filed Jun. 10, 1011 and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/360,941 filed Jul. 2, 2010.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61360941 Jul 2010 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13157580 Jun 2011 US
Child 14108787 US