The invention relates to a multilayer molded element suitable for bottom covering of vehicle floor areas or wheel housings. Molded elements of this type are utilized in order to protect the automobile body from whirled-up stones as well as spray water and in order to diminish the noise level in the interior of the vehicle and on the outside the vehicle.
When driving on gravel-paved streets and on wet roadways, stones and/or droplets of water are carried along by the tires and propelled at high speed against the vehicle body. On the one hand, this causes damage to the vehicle finish on the underside, so that corrosion may set in. In addition, the transfer of energy from the stones to the vehicle body leads to a broad-band, impulse-like vibration excitation (sound conducted through solids) of the vehicle body, which is radiated into the interior of the vehicle or outside of same in form of rattling—or crackling noise.
Hitherto customary facings of the wheel housing and the underfloor were typically made of plastic and essentially serve only for protecting the vehicle body from impacting stones. Due to the hard-surfaced solid construction, the vibration energy is not converted into heat upon the impact of the stones or water droplets, but is radiated as airborne sound either directly from the structural member or, after transfer of solid-borne sound, from the vehicle body. Other noises in the underfloor region, for example rolling motion noises or fume emission noises resulting from the exhaust train are reflected in undiminished fashion by the hard-surfaced facings.
A molded element of the here concerned type, serving as wheel house facing is known from U.S. Pat. No. 4,735,427. The layered construction comprises a dual layer, made of a layer of fibrous material and a plastic fiber layer. The two layers are needled together. Following joining by needles, the dual layer is molded by thermal deformation into a stable shell, adapted to the contour of the wheel housing. The plastic fiber/fibrous material dual layer shell, joined by means of needles, is, overall, relatively stable or hard after its deformation, so that it cannot optimally satisfy customer demands for more efficient noise reduction.
The present invention is based on the object of designing a molded element of the initially mentioned type in such manner that there is improved air-borne noise absorption and minimized excitation of solid-borne sound. In addition, the invention-specific type elements must be producible in simpler fashion.
According to the invention, these objects are solved by the distinguishing characteristics of the patent claims.
The basic benefit of the multi-layer construction according to the invention includes that the kinetic energy of impinging projectiles (stones, water droplets etc.) is distributed and attenuated over a large elastic volume. The entire element achieves efficient noise reduction, while low in weight, and this applies both with respect to excitation from projectiles as well as with respect to rolling motion noise. Whereas with relatively hard shells, the exterior noise is reflected and again radiated, with the molded element according to the invention it is possible substantially deposit the sound energy in the elastic-mass-system, which is formed by the relatively thick elastic and the wheel-side cover layer or cover lays, so that it is dissipated therein. In addition, absorption of high-frequency sound takes place in the top layer of fibrous material and of low-frequency sound in the total system.
In contrast to the state of the art, the manufacture of a molded element according to the invention is also simplified. It is no longer necessary to produce a needle-joined dual layer in a separate production step prior to the deformation of the element. Aside from joining and deformation of the layer construction, it is possible in one single working step to also undertake local compression, for example in the area of the edges. This results in complete sealing of the inner elastic layer, so that hollow spaces accessible to water and mud can no longer develop. Delaminating of the layered construction is reliably prevented.
Still further advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading and understanding the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments.
The invention may take form in various components and arrangements of components, and in various steps and arrangements of steps. The drawings are only for purposes of illustrating a preferred embodiment and are not to be construed as limiting the invention.
In
In the embodiment according to
In the embodiment according to
The inner layer 3 with a weight per unit area on the order of 300 g/m2 functions as spring for the vibration brought in from the previous layer. It may be needled for improvement of elastic properties.
In the embodiment according to
In the exemplary embodiment according to
In all types of embodiments according to
Absorption of air-borne sound essentially takes place via the inner layer 3, which is protected from taking in water because of the cover layers.
As material for the cover layers 4, 5 and/or the textured fabrics 6, 9 the following materials may be employed: polyester (PES), polypropylene, polyethylene or carbon fiber. Acoustically particularly effective is a cover fabric with a weight per area unit of approximately 50 to approximately 200 g/m2, preferably approximately 120 g/m2.
With respect to the acoustical effect of the spring-mass-system, the properties of layers 3 and 5 (material, thickness) are particularly relevant. The following materials may be used for layer 5: polypropylene, polyethylene, polyester, polyurethane, EPDM, caoutchouc, thermo-plastic materials having similar properties—all of them new or re-cycled—or also mixtures of the named materials. They have suitable chemical properties and a relatively low weight. The thickness of layer 5 ranges appropriately between 100 to 500 μm, preferably between 150 to 250 μm.
As already mentioned, the cover layer 4, which is facing away from the wheel 2, is made of the same material as cover layer 5. Its thickness is greater than the thickness of cover layer 5, namely 200 to 1000 μm, preferably 300 to 600 μm.
Layer 3, which, appropriately, is to have excellent elastic and absorption properties, can be made of textured fabric or also of foam. As textured fabric materials may be employed the following: polyester, polypropylene, other thermoplastic materials having similar properties, cotton, cellulose, mineral wool or mixtures of these materials. The textured fabric may be designed as layers of textured fabric or as blow-type textured material. The joining technology also has an influence upon the desired effect. Appropriate is the use of a needled fabric, a thermo-bonding fabric or a mixture of the two.
Hardness and spring force of layer 3 are specified by
The weight of the fabric layers lies appropriately between 200 and 600 g/m2, preferably approximately 300 g/m2.
Foam layers which can be utilized as elastic layer 3 consist, appropriately, of polyurethane, polyethylene, EVA or thermo-/duroplastic materials.
Finally, a component of the resilient layer 3 may also be gas or air. Pre-requisite for said solution is that the cover layers 4 and 5 form a sealed-off pocket, which envelops the layer of air. The hollow space formed by the cover layers 4 and 5 contains, for example, a fabric or foam layer plus air. The possibility also exists that with suitable geometry the inventive structural component 1 comprises only the two cover layers 4, 5 and a gaseous elastic layer 3. It is essential that the air cushion, delineated by the cover layer, possesses the necessary resilient force.
The properties (in particular stability and effectiveness) of the inventive structural element or molded component 1 depend upon their weight. Therefore, weight must be chosen according to application. Suitable weights range between 400 and 2000 g/m2.
A molded component according to the invention can be produced, for example, of sheets in one working step. By making use of the relatively thick elastic layer, it is possible to vary the thickness of the structural element 1 and its local mechanical and acoustic properties by means of tooling shape and extent of extrusion. For example, the edges of the component 1 can be extruded in such manner that no hollow spaces develop, in other words, so that the inner elastic layer 3 is totally sealed off.
The stability of the component is significantly increased by use of several layers, since the sandwich compound functions like a double-T-support. Further increase in stability can be attained by foil distance and structuring of the component. Optimization of stability and acoustic effectiveness is only possible with the inventive molded element 1. A comparable mass-produced structural element, which is in accordance with the state of the art (trilaminate) is heavier and less effective and clearly presents lower stability through the supporting plastic layer in the center of the construction. The thickness of the multi-layer molded component according to the invention varies between approximately 1 mm (extruded) and 10 mm and ranges typically between 3 and 6 mm.
When manufacturing molded elements 1 from semifinished articles 13 of this type, the simplified handling is of benefit compared with the purely individual materials. For example, a cover layer laminated on both sides with fibrous material can be better heated by means of contact without pasting up the heating plates, and without sagging when being softened.
Multi-layer molded elements 1 can be produced by folding the semifinished item 13. The arrows 17 in
In
Shaping of inventive molded components 1 is done under employment of pressure and/or heat. During the pressing-/cool-down step, the elastic/absorbing volume can be enlarged by inflation with air, as a result of which there is improvement in the acoustic effect and fold formation is prevented in the foil facing the wheel. In the blow-forming method, a pressurized air nozzle is inserted into the resilient layer 3 through a recess in the sealing edge of the press tool or a hole in the cover layer.
Fold formation and bulge development in the structural component can also be prevented by pre-stressing of the material. As a result, the pressing turns, in part, into a deep-drawing. In the extreme case, a vacuum deep-drawing is also possible.
Formation of marginal regions of the inventive structural components 1 are apparent from
In order to render structural components of the inventive type suitable for multiple use, it is appropriate to equip the marginal regions with T-structures of the kind represented in FIG. 5. Functions of the T-piece are, for example, integration of spoilers for aero-dynamics or of mud flaps. Moreover, it is possible with a T-piece to simplify attachment of the structural component to the sub-floor. Until now, it was only possible to realize such hinged segments with injection molding components. Textile molded pieces according to the state of the art had to be supplemented with separate (purchased) add-on parts.
The invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiment. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the invention be construed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 24 496 | May 2000 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP01/05444 | 5/12/2001 | WO | 00 | 7/29/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/89883 | 11/29/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1704048 | Jordan | Mar 1929 | A |
4101704 | Hiles | Jul 1978 | A |
4555380 | Munakata et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4735427 | Fuchs | Apr 1988 | A |
5094318 | Maeda et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5251414 | Duke | Oct 1993 | A |
5280960 | Casey | Jan 1994 | A |
5378733 | Bates et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5462331 | Stief et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5681072 | Stricker | Oct 1997 | A |
5767024 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5839761 | Dodt | Nov 1998 | A |
5915767 | Hosoda et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5976646 | Stevens et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6086104 | Marchisio et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6152259 | Freist et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6155624 | Bienenstein, Jr. | Dec 2000 | A |
6713150 | Alts et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1555288 | Oct 1970 | DE |
3313044 | Oct 1984 | DE |
29615757 | Jan 1998 | DE |
19909615 | Sep 2000 | DE |
0222193 | May 1987 | EP |
0810145 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0887483 | Dec 1998 | EP |
1034920 | Sep 2000 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030011183 A1 | Jan 2003 | US |