The present invention relates to antennae formed by sets of similar geometrical elements (polygons, polyhedrons electro magnetically coupled and grouped such that in the antenna structure may be distinguished each of the basic elements which form it.
More specifically, it relates to a specific geometrical design of said antennae by which two main advantages are provided: the antenna may operate simultaneously in several frequencies and/or its size can be substantially reduced.
The scope of application of the present invention is mainly within the field of telecommunications, and more specifically in the field of radio-communication.
Antennae were first developed towards the end of the past century, when James C. Maxwell in 1864 postulated the fundamental laws of electromagnetism. Heinrich Hertz may be attributed in 1886 with the invention of the first antenna by which transmission in air of electromagnetic waves was demonstrated. In the mid forties were shown the fundamental restrictions of antennae as regards the reduction of their size relative to wavelength, and at the start of the sixties the first frequency-independent antennae appeared. At that time helixes, spirals, logoperiodic groupings, cones and structures defined solely by angles were proposed for construction of wide band antennae.
In 1995 were introduced the fractal or multifractal type antennae (U.S. Pat. No. 9,501,019), which due to their geometry presented a, multifrequency behavior and in certain cases a small size. Later, were introduced multitriangular antennae (U.S. Pat. No. 9,800,954) which operated simultaneously in bands GSM 900 and GSM 1800.
The antennae described in the present patent have their origin in fractal and multitriangular type antennae, but solve several problems of a practical nature which limit the behavior of said antennae and reduce their applicability in real environments.
From a scientific standpoint strictly fractal antennae are impossible, as fractal objects are a mathematical abstraction which include an infinite number of elements. It is possible to generate antennae with a form based on said fractal objects, incorporating a finite number of iterations. The performance of such antennae is limited to the specific geometry of each one. For example, the position of the bands and their relative spacing is related to fractal geometry and it is not always possible, viable or economic to design the antennae maintaining its fractal appearance and at the same time placing the bands at the correct area of the radioelectric spectrum. To begin, truncation implies a clear example of the limitations brought about by using a real fractal type antenna which attempts to approximate the theoretical behavior of an ideal fractal antenna. Said effect breaks the behavior of the ideal fractal structure in the lower band, displacing it from its theoretical position relative to the other bands and in short requiring a too large size for the antenna which hinders practical applications.
In addition to such practical problems, it is not always possible to alter the fractal structure to present the level of impedance of radiation diagram which is suited to the requirements of each application. Due to these reasons, it is often necessary to leave the fractal geometry and resort to other types of geometries which offer a greater flexibility as regards the position of frequency bands of the antennae, adaptation levels and impedances, polarization and radiation diagrams.
Multitriangular structures (U.S. Pat. No. 9,800,954) were an example of non-fractal structures with a geometry designed such that the antennae could be used in base stations of GSM and DCS cellular telephony. Antennae described in said patent consisted of three triangles joined only at their vertices, of a size adequate for use in bands 890 MHz-960 MHz and 1710 MHz-1880 MHz. This was a specific solution for a specific environment which did not provide the flexibility and versatility required to deal with other antennae designs for other environments.
Multilevel antennae solve the operational limitations of fractal and multitriangular antennae. Their geometry is much more flexible, rich and varied, allowing operation of the antenna from two to many more bands, as well as providing a greater versatility as regards diagrams, band positions and impedance levels, to name a few examples. Although they are not fractal, multilevel antennae are characterised in that they comprise a number of elements which may be distinguished in the overall structure. Precisely because they clearly show several levels of detail (that of the overall structure and that of the individual elements which make it up), antennae provide a multiband behavior and/or a small size. The origin of their name also lies in said property.
The present invention consists of an antenna whose radiating element is characterised by its geometrical shape, which basically comprises several polygons or polyhedrons of the same type. That is, it comprises for example triangles, squares, pentagons, hexagons or even circles and ellipses as a limiting case of a polygon with a large number of sides, as well as tetrahedra, hexahedra, prisms, dodecahedra, etc. coupled to each other electrically (either through at least one point of contact o through a small separation providing a capacitive coupling) and grouped in structures of a higher level such that in the body of the antenna can be identified the polygonal or polyhedral elements which it comprises. In turn, structures generated in this manner can be grouped in higher order structures in a manner similar to the basic elements, and so on until reaching as many levels as the antenna designer desires.
Its designation as multilevel antenna is precisely due to the fact that in the body of the antenna can be identified at least two levels of detail: that of the overall structure and that of the majority of the elements (polygons or polyhedrons) which make it up. This is achieved by ensuring that the area of contact or intersection (if it exists) between the majority of the elements forming the antenna is only a fraction of the perimeter or surrounding area of said, polygons or polyhedrons.
A particular property of multilevel antennae is that their radioelectric behavior can be similar in several frequency bands. Antenna input parameters (impedance and radiation diagram) remain similar for several frequency bands (that is, the antenna has the same level of adaptation or standing wave relationship in each different band), and often the antenna presents almost identical radiation diagrams at different frequencies. This is due precisely to the multilevel structure of the antenna, that is, to the fact that it remains possible to identify in the antenna the majority of basic elements (same type polygons or polyhedrons) which make it up. The number of frequency bands is proportional to the number of scales or sizes of the polygonal elements or similar sets in which they are grouped contained in the geometry of the main radiating element.
In addition to their multiband behavior, multilevel structure antennae usually have a smaller than usual size as compared to other antennae of a simpler structure. (Such as those consisting of a single polygon or polyhedron). This is because the path followed by the electric current on the multilevel structure is longer and more winding than in a simple geometry, due to the empty spaces between the various polygon or polyhedron elements. Said empty spaces force a given path for the current (which must circumvent said spaces) which travels a greater distance and therefore resonates at a lower frequency. Additionally, its edge-rich and discontinuity-rich structure simplifies the radiation process, relatively increasing the radiation resistance of the antenna and reducing the quality factor Q, i.e. increasing its bandwidth.
Thus, the main characteristic of multilevel antennae are the following:
In specialized literature it is already possible to find descriptions of certain antennae designs which allow to cover a few bands. However, in these designs the multiband behavior is achieved by grouping several single band antennae or by incorporating reactive elements in the antennae (concentrated elements as inductors or capacitors or their integrated versions such as posts or notches) which force the apparition of new resonance frequencies. Multilevel antennae on the contrary base their behavior on their particular geometry, offering a greater flexibility to the antenna designer as to the number of bands (proportional to the number of levels of detail), position, relative spacing and width, and thereby offer better and more varied characteristics for the final product.
A multilevel structure can be used in any known antenna configuration. As a nonlimiting example can be cited: dipoles, monopoles, patch or microstrip antennae, coplanar antennae, reflector antennae, wound antennae or even antenna arrays. Manufacturing techniques are also not characteristic of multilevel antennae as the best suited technique may be used for each structure or application. For example: printing on dielectric substrate by photolithography (printed circuit technique); dieing on metal plate, repulsion on dielectric, etc.
Publication WO 97/06578 discloses a fractal antenna, which has nothing to do with a multilevel antenna being both geometries essentially different.
Further characteristics and advantages of the invention will become apparent in view of the detailed description which follows of a preferred embodiment of the invention given for purposes of illustration only and in no way meant as a definition of the limits of the invention, made with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the detailed description which follows f a preferred embodiment of the present invention permanent reference is made to the figures of the drawings, where the same numerals refer to the identical or similar parts.
The present invention relates to an antenna which includes at least one construction element in a multilevel structure form. A multilevel structure is characterized in that it is formed by gathering several polygon or polyhedron of the same type (for example triangles, parallelepipeds, pentagons, hexagons, etc., even circles or ellipses as special limiting cases of a polygon with a large number of sides, as well as tetrahedra, hexahedra, prisms, dodecahedra, etc. coupled to each other electromagnetically, whether by proximity or by direct contact between elements. A multilevel structure or figure is distinguished from another conventional figure precisely by the interconnection (if it exists) between its component elements (the polygon or polyhedron). In a multilevel structure at least 75% of its component elements have more than 50% of their perimeter (for polygons) not in contact with any of the other elements of the structure. Thus, in a multilevel structure it is easy to identify geometrically and individually distinguish most of its basic component elements, presenting at least two levels of detail: that of the overall structure and that of the polygon or polyhedron elements which form it. Its name is precisely due to this characteristic and from the fact that the polygon or polyhedron can be included in a great variety of sizes. Additionally, several multilevel structures may be grouped and coupled electromagnetically to each other to form higher level structures. In a multilevel structure all the component elements are polygons with the same number of sides or polyhedron with the same number of faces. Naturally, this property is broken when several multilevel structures of different natures are grouped and electromagnetically coupled to form meta-structures of a higher level.
In this manner, in
It should be remarked that the difference between multilevel antennae and other existing antennae lies in the particular geometry, not in their configuration as an antenna or in the materials used for construction. Thus, the multilevel structure may be used with any known antenna configuration, such as for example and in a non limiting manner: dipoles, monopoles, patch or microstrip antennae, coplanar antennae, reflector antennae, wound antennae or even in arrays. In general, the multilevel structure forms part of the radiative element characteristic of said configurations, such as the arm, the mass plane or both in a monopole, an arm or both in a dipole, the patch or printed element in a microstrip, patch or coplanar antenna; the reflector for an reflector antenna, or the conical section or even antenna walls in a horn type antenna. It is even possible to use a spiral type antenna configuration in which the geometry of the loop or loops is the outer perimeter of a multilevel structure. In all, the difference between a multilevel antenna and a conventional one lies in the geometry of the radiative element or one of its components, and not in its specific configuration.
As regards construction materials and technology, the implementation of multilevel antennae is not limited to any of these in particular and any of the existing or future techniques may be employed as considered best suited for each application, as the essence of the invention is found in the geometry used in the multilevel structure and not in the specific configuration. Thus, the multilevel structure may for example be formed by sheets, parts of conducting or superconducting material, by printing in dielectric substrates (rigid or flexible) with a metallic coating as with printed circuits, by imbrications of several dielectric materials which form the multilevel structure, etc. always depending on the specific requirements of each case and application. Once the multilevel structure is formed the implementation of the antenna depends on the chosen configuration (monopole, dipole, patch, horn, reflector . . . ). For monopole, spiral, dipole and patch antennae the multisimilar structure is implemented on a metal support (a simple procedure involves applying a photolithography process to a virgin printed circuit dielectric plate) and the structure is mounted on a standard microwave connector, which for the monopole or patch cases is in turn connected to a mass plane (typically a metal plate or case) as for any conventional antenna. For the dipole case two identical multilevel structures form the two arms of the antenna; in an opening antenna the multilevel geometry may be part of the metal wall of a horn or its cross section, and finally for a reflector the multisimilar element or a set of these may form or cover the reflector.
The most relevant properties of the multilevel antennae are mainly due to their geometry and are as follows: the possibility of simultaneous operation in several frequency bands in a similar manner (similar impedance and radiation diagrams) and the possibility of reducing their size compared to other conventional antennae based exclusively on a single polygon or polyhedron. Such properties are particularly relevant in the field of communication systems. Simultaneous operation in several freq bands allows a single multilevel antenna to integrate several communication systems, instead of assigning an antenna for each system or service as is conventional. Size reduction is particularly useful when the antenna must be concealed due to its visual impact in the urban or rural landscape, or to its unaesthetic or unaerodynamic effect when incorporated on a vehicle or a portable telecommunication device.
An example of the advantages obtained from the use of a multiband antenna in a real environment is the multilevel antenna AM1, described further below, used for GSM and DCS environments. These antennae are designed to meet radioelectric specifications in both cell phone systems. Using a single GSM and DCS multilevel antenna for both bands (900 MHz and 1800 MHz) cell telephony operators can reduce costs and environmental impact of their station networks while increasing the number of users (customers) supported by the network.
It becomes particularly relevant to differentiate multilevel antennae from fractal antennae. The latter are based on fractal geometry, which is based on abstract mathematical concepts which are difficult to implement in practice. Specialized scientific literature usually defines as fractal those geometrical objects with a non-integral Haussdorf dimension. This means that fractal objects exist only as an abstraction or a concept, but that said geometries are unthinkable (in a strict sense) for a tangible object or drawing, although it is true that antennae based on this geometry have been developed and widely described in the scientific literature, despite their geometry not being strictly fractal in scientific terms. Nevertheless some of these antennae provide a multiband behaviour (their impedance and radiation diagram remains practically constant for several freq bands), they do not on their own offer all of the behaviour required of an antenna for applicability in a practical environment. Thus, Sierpinski's antenna for example has a multiband behaviour with N bands spaced by a factor of 2, and although with this spacing one could conceive its use for communications networks GSM 900 MHz and GSM 1800 MHz (or DCS), its unsuitable radiation diagram and size for these frequencies prevent a practical use in a real environment. In short, to obtain an antenna which in addition to providing a multiband behaviour meets all of the specifications demanded for each specific application it is almost always necessary to abandon the fractal geometry and resort for example to multilevel geometry antennae. As an example, none of the structures described in
In any case multilevel structures should not be confused with arrays of antennae. Although it is true that an array is formed by sets of identical antennae, in these the elements are electromagnetically decoupled, exactly the opposite of what is intended in multilevel antennae. In an array each element is powered independently whether by specific, signal transmitters or receivers for each element, or by a signal distribution network, while in a multilevel antenna the structure is excited in a few of its elements and the remaining ones are coupled electromagnetically or by direct contact (in a region which does not exceed 50% of the perimeter or surface of adjacent elements). In an array is sought an increase in the directivity of an individual antenna o forming a diagram for a specific application; in a multilevel antenna the object is to obtain a maul-band behaviour or a reduced size of the antenna, which implies a completely different application from arrays.
Below are described, for purposes of illustration only, two non-limiting examples of operational modes for Multilevel Antennae (AM1 and AM2) for specific environments and applications.
Mode AM1
This model consists of a multilevel patch type antenna, shown in
The multilevel structure (8.10), or antenna patch, consists of a printed copper sheet on a standard fiberglass printed circuit board. The multilevel geometry consists of 5 triangles (8.1-8.5) joined at their vertices, as shown in
The multilevel patch (8.10) is mounted parallel to an earth plane (8.9) of rectangular aluminum of 22×18.5 cm. The separation between the patch and the earth plane is 3.3 cm, which is maintained by a pair of dielectric spacers which act as support (8.12).
Connection to the antenna is at two points of the multilevel structure, one for each operational band (GSM 900 and GSM 1800). Excitation is achieved by a vertical metal post perpendicular to the mass plane and to the multilevel structure, capacitively finished by a metal sheet which is electrically coupled by proximity (capacitive effect) to the patch. This is a standard system in patch configuration antennae, by which the object is to compensate the inductive effect of the post with the capacitive effect of its finish.
At the base of the excitation post is connected the circuit which interconnects the elements and the port of access to the antenna or connector (8.13). Said interconnexion circuit may be formed with microstrip, coaxial or strip-line technology to name a few examples, and incorporates conventional adaptation networks which transform the impedance measured at the base of the post to 50 ohms (with a typical tolerance in the standing wave relation (SWR) usual for these application under 1.5) required at the input/output antenna connector. Said connector is generally of the type N or SMA for micro-cell base station applications.
In addition to adapting the impedance and providing an interconnection with the radiating element the interconnection network (8.11) may include a diplexor allowing the antenna to be presented in a two connector configuration (one for each band) or in a single connector for both bands.
For a double connector configuration in order to increase the insulation between the GSM 900 and GSM 1800 (DCS) terminals, the base of the DCS band excitation post may be connected to a parallel stub of electrical length equal to half a wavelength, in the central DCS wavelength, and finishing in an open circuit. Similarly, at the base of the GSM 900 lead can be connected a parallel stub ending in an open circuit of electrical length slightly greater than one quarter of the wavelength at the central wavelength of the GSM band. Said stub introduces a capacitance in the base of the connection which may be regulated to compensate the residual inductive effect of the post. Furthermore, said stub presents a very low impedance in the DCS band which aids in the insulation is between connectors in said band.
In
Radiation diagrams in the vertical (10.1 and 10.3) and the horizontal plane (10.2 and 10.4) for both bands are shown in
Mode AM2
This model consists of a multilevel antenna in a monopole configuration, shown in
The antenna operates in a similar manner simultaneously for the bands 1880 MHz-1930 MHz and 3400 MHz-3600 MHz, such as in installations with the system DECT. The multilevel structure is formed by three or five triangles (see FIGS. 11 and 3.6) to which may be added an inductive loop (11.1). The antenna presents an omnidirectional radiation diagram in the horizontal plane and is conceived mainly for (but not limited to) mounting on roof or floor.
The multilevel structure is printed on a Rogers R04003 dielectric substrate (11.2) of 5.5 cm width; 4.9 cm height and 0.8 mm thickness, and with a dielectric permittivity equal to 3.38. the multilevel element consists of three triangles (11.3-11.5) joined at the vertex; the bottom triangle (11.3) has a height of 1.82 cm, while the multilevel structure has a total height of 2.72 cm. In order to reduce the total size f the antenna the multilevel element is added an inductive loop (11.1) at its top with a trapezoidal shape in this specific application, so that the total size of the radiating element is 4.5 cm.
The multilevel structure is mounted perpendicularly on a metallic (such as aluminum) earth plane (11.6) with a square or circular shape about 18 cm in length or diameter. The bottom vertex of the element is placed on the center of the mass plane and forms the excitation point for the antenna. At this point is connected the interconnection network which links the radiating element to the input/output connector. Said interconnection network may be implemented as a microstrip, strip-line or coaxial technology to name a few examples. In this specific example the microstrip configuration was used. In addition to the interconnection between radiating element and connector, the network can be used as an impedance transformer, adapting the impedance at the vertex of the multilevel element to the 50 Ohms Lr,<−14 dB, SWR <1.5) required at the input/output connector.
One can observe an omnidirectional behaviour in the horizontal plane and a typical bilobular diagram in the vertical plane with the typical antenna directivity above 4 dBi in the 1900 band and 6 dBi in the 3500 band.
In the antenna behavior it should be remarked that the behavior is quite similar for both bands (both SWR and in the diagram) which makes it a multiband antenna.
Both the AM1 and AM2 antennae will typically be coated in a dielectric radome which is practically transparent to electromagnetic radiation, meant to protect the radiating element and the connection network from external aggression as well as to provide a pleasing external appearance.
It is not considered necessary to extend this description in the understanding that an expert in the field would be capable of understanding its scope and advantages resulting thereof, as well as to reproduce it.
However, as the above description relates only to a preferred embodiment, it should be understood that within this essence may be introduced various variations of detail, also protected, the size and/or materials used in manufacturing the whole or any of its parts.
This application is a Divisional Application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/179,257 filed on Jul. 12, 2005, entitled: Multilevel Antennae; which is a Continuation Application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/102,390, filed on Apr. 8, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,208, entitled: Multilevel Antennae; which is a Continuation Application of U.S. Ser. No. 10/963,080, filed on Oct. 12, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,015,868, entitled: Multilevel Antennae; which is a Continuation Application of U.S. Ser. No. 10/102,568, filed on Mar. 18, 2002 now abandoned, which is a Continuation Application of. PCT/ES99/00296, filed Sep. 20, 1999.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
621455 | Hess et al. | Mar 1899 | A |
646850 | Lindemeyr | Apr 1900 | A |
3079602 | Hamel et al. | Feb 1963 | A |
3521284 | Shelton, Jr. et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
3599214 | Altmayer | Aug 1971 | A |
3605102 | Frye | Sep 1971 | A |
3622890 | Fujimoto et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3683376 | Pronovost | Aug 1972 | A |
3818490 | Leahy | Jun 1974 | A |
3967276 | Goubau | Jun 1976 | A |
3969730 | Fuchser | Jul 1976 | A |
4021810 | Urpo et al. | May 1977 | A |
4024542 | Ikawa et al. | May 1977 | A |
4131893 | Munson et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4141014 | Sletten | Feb 1979 | A |
4141016 | Nelson | Feb 1979 | A |
4218682 | Frosch et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4243990 | Nemit et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4290071 | Fenwick | Sep 1981 | A |
4471358 | Glasser | Sep 1984 | A |
4471493 | Schober | Sep 1984 | A |
4504834 | Garay et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4517572 | Dixon | May 1985 | A |
4518968 | Hately | May 1985 | A |
4521784 | Nemet | Jun 1985 | A |
4527164 | Cestaro et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4531130 | Powers et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4543581 | Nemet | Sep 1985 | A |
4553146 | Butler | Nov 1985 | A |
4571595 | Phillips et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4584709 | Kneisel et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4590614 | Erat | May 1986 | A |
4623894 | Lee et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4656642 | Apostolos et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4673948 | Kuo | Jun 1987 | A |
4709239 | Herrick | Nov 1987 | A |
4723305 | Phillips et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4730195 | Phillips et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4792809 | Gilbert et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4794396 | Pothier | Dec 1988 | A |
4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4839660 | Hadzoglou | Jun 1989 | A |
4843468 | Drewery | Jun 1989 | A |
4847629 | Shimazaki | Jul 1989 | A |
4849766 | Inaba et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4857939 | Shimazaki | Aug 1989 | A |
4890114 | Egashira | Dec 1989 | A |
4894663 | Urbish et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4907011 | Kuo | Mar 1990 | A |
4912481 | Mace et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4975711 | Lee | Dec 1990 | A |
5030963 | Tadama | Jul 1991 | A |
5033385 | Zeren | Jul 1991 | A |
5046080 | Lee et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5061944 | Powers et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5074214 | Zeren | Dec 1991 | A |
5138328 | Zibrik et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5164980 | Bush et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5168472 | Lockwood | Dec 1992 | A |
5172084 | Fiedzuiszko et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5197140 | Blamer | Mar 1993 | A |
5200756 | Feller | Apr 1993 | A |
5210542 | Pett et al. | May 1993 | A |
5212742 | Normile et al. | May 1993 | A |
5212777 | Gove et al. | May 1993 | A |
5214434 | Hau | May 1993 | A |
5218370 | Blaese | Jun 1993 | A |
5227804 | Oda | Jul 1993 | A |
5227808 | Davis | Jul 1993 | A |
5245350 | Sroka | Sep 1993 | A |
5248988 | Makino | Sep 1993 | A |
5255002 | Day | Oct 1993 | A |
5257032 | Diamond et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258765 | Dorrie et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5262791 | Tsuda | Nov 1993 | A |
5300936 | Izadian | Apr 1994 | A |
5307075 | Huynh | Apr 1994 | A |
5337063 | Takahira | Aug 1994 | A |
5337065 | Bonnet | Aug 1994 | A |
5347291 | Moore | Sep 1994 | A |
5355144 | Walton et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355318 | Dionnet et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5363114 | Shoemaker | Nov 1994 | A |
5373300 | Jenness et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5394163 | Bullen et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5402134 | Miller et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5420599 | Erkocevic | May 1995 | A |
5422651 | Chang | Jun 1995 | A |
5438357 | McNelley | Aug 1995 | A |
5451965 | Matsumoto | Sep 1995 | A |
5451968 | Emery | Sep 1995 | A |
5453751 | Tsukamoto et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5457469 | Diamond et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5471224 | Barkeshli | Nov 1995 | A |
5493702 | Crowley et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495261 | Baker et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5508709 | Krenz et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5534877 | Sorbello et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537367 | Lockwood et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5559524 | Takei et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563882 | Bruno et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569879 | Gloton et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572223 | Phillips | Nov 1996 | A |
5600844 | Shaw et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5619205 | Johnson | Apr 1997 | A |
5621913 | Tuttle et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627550 | Sanad | May 1997 | A |
5646635 | Cockson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646637 | Miller | Jul 1997 | A |
5657028 | Sanad | Aug 1997 | A |
5672345 | Curtiss, III | Sep 1997 | A |
5680144 | Sanad | Oct 1997 | A |
5684672 | Karidis et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5703600 | Burrell et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710458 | Iwasaki | Jan 1998 | A |
5712640 | Andou et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5734352 | Seward et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742258 | Kumpfbeck et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5764190 | Murch et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767811 | Mandai et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767814 | Conroy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790080 | Apostolos | Aug 1998 | A |
5798688 | Schofield | Aug 1998 | A |
5805113 | Ogino et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808586 | Phillips et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821907 | Zhu et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841403 | West | Nov 1998 | A |
5861845 | Lee et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870066 | Asakura et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872546 | Ihara et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5898404 | Jou | Apr 1999 | A |
5903240 | Kawahata et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913174 | Casarez et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5926139 | Korish | Jul 1999 | A |
5926141 | Lindenmeier et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926208 | Noonen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929822 | Kumpfbeck et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936583 | Sekine et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943020 | Liebendoerfer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945954 | Johnson | Aug 1999 | A |
5963871 | Zhinong et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966097 | Fukasawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966098 | Qi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969689 | Martek et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973648 | Lindenmeier et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973651 | Suesada et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982337 | Newman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986609 | Spall | Nov 1999 | A |
5986610 | Miron | Nov 1999 | A |
5986615 | Westfall et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990838 | Burns et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002367 | Engblom et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005524 | Hayes et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008764 | Ollikainen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008774 | Wu | Dec 1999 | A |
6011518 | Yamagishi et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014114 | Westfall et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018319 | Lindmark | Jan 2000 | A |
6028568 | Asakura et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031495 | Simmons et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031499 | Dichter | Feb 2000 | A |
6031505 | Qi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034645 | Legay et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6037902 | Pinhas et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039583 | Korsunsky et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6040803 | Spall | Mar 2000 | A |
6043783 | Endo et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049314 | Munson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054953 | Lindmark | Apr 2000 | A |
6057801 | Desclos et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069592 | Wass | May 2000 | A |
6072434 | Papatheodorou | Jun 2000 | A |
6075485 | Lilly et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075500 | Kurz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078294 | Mitarai | Jun 2000 | A |
6081237 | Sato et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6087990 | Thill et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091365 | Derneryd et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097345 | Walton | Aug 2000 | A |
6100855 | Vinson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104349 | Cohen | Aug 2000 | A |
6107920 | Eberhardt et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111545 | Saari | Aug 2000 | A |
6112102 | Zhinong | Aug 2000 | A |
6114674 | Baugh et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122533 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124830 | Yuanzhu | Sep 2000 | A |
6127977 | Cohen | Oct 2000 | A |
6131042 | Lee et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133883 | Munson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140969 | Lindenmeier et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140975 | Cohen | Oct 2000 | A |
6147652 | Sekine | Nov 2000 | A |
6147655 | Roesner | Nov 2000 | A |
6154180 | Padrick | Nov 2000 | A |
6157348 | Openlander | Dec 2000 | A |
6160513 | Davidson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166694 | Ying | Dec 2000 | A |
6172618 | Hakozaki et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175333 | Smith et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181281 | Desclos et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195048 | Chiba et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198943 | Sadler et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211824 | Holden et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6211834 | Durham et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6211889 | Stoutamire | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215447 | Johnson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218989 | Schneider et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218991 | Sanad | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218992 | Sadler et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222497 | Hu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236372 | Lindenmeier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239752 | Blanchard | May 2001 | B1 |
6239765 | Johnson | May 2001 | B1 |
6255994 | Saito | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6255995 | Asano et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260088 | Gove et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266023 | Nagy et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266538 | Waldron | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268836 | Faulkner et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271794 | Geeraert | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281846 | Puente Baliarda et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285326 | Diximus et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6285342 | Brady et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292154 | Deguchi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297711 | Seward et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300910 | Kim | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300914 | Yang | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304220 | Herve et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304222 | Smith et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307511 | Ying et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307512 | Geeraert | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317083 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320543 | Ohata et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323811 | Tsubaki et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326919 | Diximus et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6326927 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327485 | Waldron | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329951 | Wen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329954 | Fuchs et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329962 | Ying | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6333716 | Pontoppidan | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333720 | Gottl et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342861 | Packard | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343208 | Ying | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6346914 | Annamaa | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348892 | Annamaa et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351241 | Wass | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353443 | Ying | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360105 | Nakada et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6362790 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366243 | Isohatala | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367939 | Carter et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373447 | Rostoker et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377217 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380895 | Moren et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380902 | Duroux | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6384790 | Dishart | May 2002 | B2 |
6384793 | Scordilis | May 2002 | B2 |
6388626 | Gamalielsson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400339 | Edvardsson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407710 | Keilen et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6408190 | Ying | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417810 | Huels et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417816 | Sadler et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6421014 | Sanad | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421024 | Stolle | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424315 | Glenn et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429818 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6431712 | Turnbull | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445352 | Cohen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452549 | Lo | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452553 | Cohen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456249 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470174 | Schefte et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476766 | Cohen | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483462 | Weinberger | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6492952 | Hu | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496154 | Gyenes | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6498586 | Pankinaho | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6498588 | Callaghan | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6525691 | Varadan et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6538604 | Isohatala et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539608 | McKinnon et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6545640 | Herve et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552690 | Veerasamy | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6603434 | Lindenmeier et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6628784 | Montane Condemines | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6693603 | Smith et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697024 | Fuerst et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6707428 | Gram | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6741210 | Brachat et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6756944 | Tessier et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6831606 | Sajadinia | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6937191 | Puente Baliarda | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6980158 | Iguchi et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7072698 | Underbrink et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7126537 | Cohen | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20010050636 | Weinberger | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010050638 | Ishitobi et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020000940 | Moren et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020109633 | Ow et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030160723 | Cohen | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030201942 | Poilasne | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2438199 | Sep 1999 | AU |
2 416 437 | Jan 2002 | CA |
33 37 941 | May 1985 | DE |
195 11 300 | Oct 1996 | DE |
199 29 689 | Jan 2001 | DE |
102 06 426 | Nov 2002 | DE |
101 38 265 | Jul 2003 | DE |
102 04 079 | Aug 2003 | DE |
0 096 847 | Dec 1983 | EP |
0 297 813 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0 358 090 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0 431 764 | Jun 1991 | EP |
0 543 645 | May 1993 | EP |
0 571 124 | Nov 1993 | EP |
0 688 040 | Dec 1995 | EP |
1515392 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0 749 176 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0 753 897 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0 765 001 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0 814 536 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0 843 905 | May 1998 | EP |
0 856 907 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0 871 238 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0 892 459 | Jan 1999 | EP |
0 902 472 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0 929 121 | Jul 1999 | EP |
0 932 219 | Jul 1999 | EP |
0 942 488 | Sep 1999 | EP |
0 969 375 | Jan 2000 | EP |
0 986 130 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0 993 070 | Apr 2000 | EP |
0 997 974 | May 2000 | EP |
1 018 777 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1 018 779 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1 024 552 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 026 774 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 063 721 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 067 627 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 071 161 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 077 508 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1 079 462 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1 083 624 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1 094 545 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1 096 602 | May 2001 | EP |
1 148 581 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1 198 027 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1 237 224 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1 267 438 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1 317 018 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1 326 302 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1 378 961 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1 396 906 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1 401 050 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1 414 106 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1 424 747 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1 443 595 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1 453 140 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 465 291 | Oct 2004 | EP |
2 112 163 | Mar 1998 | ES |
2 142 280 | May 1998 | ES |
009902216 | Jul 2001 | ES |
2 543 744 | Oct 1984 | FR |
2 704 359 | Oct 1994 | FR |
2 837 339 | Sep 2003 | FR |
2 112 579 | Jul 1983 | GB |
2 161 026 | Jan 1986 | GB |
2 215 136 | Sep 1989 | GB |
2 289 163 | Sep 1989 | GB |
2 330 951 | May 1999 | GB |
2 355 116 | Apr 2001 | GB |
2 361 584 | Oct 2001 | GB |
55123203 | Sep 1980 | JP |
55-147806 | Nov 1980 | JP |
5-7109 | Jan 1983 | JP |
5-129816 | May 1983 | JP |
5-267916 | Oct 1983 | JP |
5-347507 | Dec 1993 | JP |
6-204908 | Jul 1994 | JP |
9-252214 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10-93332 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10-209744 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11-88032 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-317610 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2003 28 3230 | Oct 2003 | JP |
508835 | Apr 2001 | NZ |
2 170 478 | Jul 2001 | RU |
518 988 | Dec 2002 | SE |
5 545 71 | Sep 2003 | TW |
9312559 | Jun 1993 | WO |
9424722 | Oct 1994 | WO |
9424723 | Oct 1994 | WO |
9505012 | Feb 1995 | WO |
9511530 | Apr 1995 | WO |
9603783 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9604691 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9610276 | Apr 1996 | WO |
9627219 | Sep 1996 | WO |
9629755 | Sep 1996 | WO |
9638881 | Dec 1996 | WO |
9706578 | Feb 1997 | WO |
9711507 | Mar 1997 | WO |
9732355 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9733338 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9735360 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9747054 | Dec 1997 | WO |
9812771 | Mar 1998 | WO |
9833234 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9836469 | Aug 1998 | WO |
9839814 | Sep 1998 | WO |
9903166 | Jan 1999 | WO |
9903167 | Jan 1999 | WO |
9903168 | Jan 1999 | WO |
9925042 | May 1999 | WO |
9925044 | May 1999 | WO |
9927607 | Jun 1999 | WO |
9927608 | Jun 1999 | WO |
9931757 | Jun 1999 | WO |
9935691 | Jul 1999 | WO |
9956345 | Nov 1999 | WO |
9957785 | Nov 1999 | WO |
9960665 | Nov 1999 | WO |
9962139 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0001028 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0003451 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0003453 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0022695 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0030267 | May 2000 | WO |
0031825 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0036700 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0049680 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0052784 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0052787 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0057511 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0055939 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0008712 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0074172 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0077884 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0103238 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0105048 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0106594 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0108255 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0108257 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0108260 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0109976 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0111721 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0113464 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0115270 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0115271 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0117061 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0117063 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0117064 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0118904 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0118909 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0120714 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0120927 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0122528 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0124314 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0124316 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0126182 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0128035 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0129927 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0124314 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0131739 | May 2001 | WO |
0133665 | May 2001 | WO |
0135491 | May 2001 | WO |
0137369 | May 2001 | WO |
0137370 | May 2001 | WO |
0139321 | May 2001 | WO |
0141252 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0148861 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0154225 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0165636 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0173890 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0178192 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0182410 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0186753 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0189031 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0201668 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0235646 | May 2002 | WO |
0235652 | May 2002 | WO |
02054538 | Jul 2002 | WO |
02065583 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02071535 | Sep 2002 | WO |
02078123 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02078124 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02080306 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02087014 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02089254 | Nov 2002 | WO |
02091518 | Nov 2002 | WO |
02096166 | Nov 2002 | WO |
02103843 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03003503 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03017421 | Feb 2003 | WO |
03023900 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03026064 | Mar 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070279289 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11179257 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 11550256 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11102390 | Apr 2005 | US |
Child | 11179257 | US | |
Parent | 10963080 | Oct 2004 | US |
Child | 11102390 | US | |
Parent | 10102568 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 10963080 | US | |
Parent | PCT/ES99/00296 | Sep 1999 | US |
Child | 10102568 | US |