The present invention relates generally to a multilevel correlated magnetic system and method for using the multilevel correlated magnetic system. A wide-range of devices including a retractable magnet assembly, a disengagement/engagement tool, and a click on-click off device are described herein that may incorporate or interact with one or more of the multilevel correlated magnetic systems.
In one aspect, the present invention provides a multilevel correlated magnetic system, comprising: (a) a first correlated magnetic structure including a first portion which has a plurality of coded magnetic sources and a second portion which has one or more magnetic sources; (b) a second correlated magnetic structure including a first portion which has a plurality of complementary coded magnetic sources and a second portion which has one or more magnetic sources; (c) the first correlated magnetic structure is aligned with the second correlated magnetic structure such that the first portions and the second portions are respectively located across from one another; and (d) a tool that applies a bias magnet field to cause a transition of the first and second magnetic structures from a closed state in which the first and second magnetic structures are attached to an open state in which the first and second magnetic structures are separated.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a magnet assembly comprising: (a) a containment vessel; and (b) a first magnet located within the containment vessel, wherein the first magnet moves from a retracted position to an engagement position and vice versa, and wherein when the first magnet is in the retracted position there is a limited magnetic field present at a measurement location located at an opposite end of the containment vessel.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a stacked multi-level structure configured to produce a click on-click off behavior. The stacked multi-level structure comprising: (a) a first repel-snap multilevel structure comprising: (i) a first correlated magnetic structure including a first portion which has a plurality of coded magnetic sources and a second portion which has one or more magnetic sources; (ii) a second correlated magnetic structure including a first portion which has a plurality of complementary coded magnetic sources and a second portion which has one or more magnetic sources; and (iii) the first correlated magnetic structure is aligned with the second correlated magnetic structure such that the first portions and the second portions are respectively located across from one another; (b) a second repel-snap multilevel structure comprising: (i) the second correlated magnetic structure; and (ii) a third correlated magnetic structure including a first portion which has a plurality of complementary coded magnetic sources and a second portion which has one or more magnetic sources; (iii) the second correlated magnetic structure is aligned with the third correlated magnetic structure such that the first portions and the second portions are respectively located across from one another.
In still yet another aspect, the present invention provides a stacked multi-level structure configured to produce a click on-click off behavior. The stacked multi-level structure comprising: (a) a first repel-snap multilevel structure comprising: (i) a first correlated magnetic structure including a first portion which has a plurality of coded magnetic sources and a second portion which has one or more magnetic sources; (ii) a second correlated magnetic structure including a first portion which has a plurality of complementary coded magnetic sources and a second portion which has one or more magnetic sources; and (iii) the first correlated magnetic structure is aligned with the second correlated magnetic structure such that the first portions and the second portions are respectively located across from one another; (b) a second repel-snap multilevel structure comprising: (i) a third correlated magnetic structure including a first portion which has a plurality of coded magnetic sources and a second portion which has one or more magnetic sources; (ii) a fourth correlated magnetic structure including a first portion which has a plurality of complementary coded magnetic sources and a second portion which has one or more magnetic sources; and (iii) the third correlated magnetic structure is aligned with the fourth correlated magnetic structure such that the first portions and the second portions are respectively located across from one another; and (c) an intermediate layer located between the second correlated magnetic structure and the third correlated magnetic structure.
Additional aspects of the invention will be set forth, in part, in the detailed description, figures and any claims which follow, and in part will be derived from the detailed description, or can be learned by practice of the invention. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention as disclosed.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be obtained by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
The present invention includes a multilevel correlated magnetic system and method for using the multilevel correlated magnetic system. The multilevel correlated magnetic system of the present invention is made possible, in part, by the use of an emerging, revolutionary technology that is called correlated magnetics. This revolutionary technology referred to herein as correlated magnetics was first fully described and enabled in the co-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/123,718 filed on May 20, 2008 and entitled “A Field Emission System and Method”. The contents of this document are hereby incorporated herein by reference. A second generation of a correlated magnetic technology is described and enabled in the co-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/358,423 filed on Jan. 23, 2009 and entitled “A Field Emission System and Method”. The contents of this document are hereby incorporated herein by reference. A third generation of a correlated magnetic technology is described and enabled in the co-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/476,952 filed on Jun. 2, 2009 and entitled “A Field Emission System and Method”. The contents of this document are hereby incorporated herein by reference. Another technology known as correlated inductance, which is related to correlated magnetics, has been described and enabled in the co-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/322,561 filed on Feb. 4, 2009 and entitled “A System and Method for Producing an Electric Pulse”. The contents of this document are hereby incorporated by reference. A brief discussion about correlated magnetics is provided first before a detailed discussion is provided about the multilevel correlated magnetic system and method of the present invention.
Correlated Magnetics Technology
This section is provided to introduce the reader to basic magnets and the new and revolutionary correlated magnetic technology. This section includes subsections relating to basic magnets, correlated magnets, and correlated electromagnetics. It should be understood that this section is provided to assist the reader with understanding the present invention, and should not be used to limit the scope of the present invention.
A. Magnets
A magnet is a material or object that produces a magnetic field which is a vector field that has a direction and a magnitude (also called strength). Referring to
Referring to
B. Correlated Magnets
Correlated magnets can be created in a wide variety of ways depending on the particular application as described in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/123,718, 12/358,432, and 12/476,952 by using a unique combination of magnet arrays (referred to herein as magnetic field emission sources), correlation theory (commonly associated with probability theory and statistics) and coding theory (commonly associated with communication systems and radar systems). A brief discussion is provided next to explain how these widely diverse technologies are used in a unique and novel way to create correlated magnets.
Basically, correlated magnets are made from a combination of magnetic (or electric) field emission sources which have been configured in accordance with a pre-selected code having desirable correlation properties. Thus, when a magnetic field emission structure is brought into alignment with a complementary, or mirror image, magnetic field emission structure the various magnetic field emission sources will all align causing a peak spatial attraction force to be produced, while the misalignment of the magnetic field emission structures cause the various magnetic field emission sources to substantially cancel each other out in a manner that is a function of the particular code used to design the two magnetic field emission structures. In contrast, when a magnetic field emission structure is brought into alignment with a duplicate magnetic field emission structure then the various magnetic field emission sources all align causing a peak spatial repelling force to be produced, while the misalignment of the magnetic field emission structures causes the various magnetic field emission sources to substantially cancel each other out in a manner that is a function of the particular code used to design the two magnetic field emission structures.
The aforementioned spatial forces (attraction, repelling) have a magnitude that is a function of the relative alignment of two magnetic field emission structures and their corresponding spatial force (or correlation) function, the spacing (or distance) between the two magnetic field emission structures, and the magnetic field strengths and polarities of the various sources making up the two magnetic field emission structures. The spatial force functions can be used to achieve precision alignment and precision positioning not possible with basic magnets. Moreover, the spatial force functions can enable the precise control of magnetic fields and associated spatial forces thereby enabling new forms of attachment devices for attaching objects with precise alignment and new systems and methods for controlling precision movement of objects. An additional unique characteristic associated with correlated magnets relates to the situation where the various magnetic field sources making-up two magnetic field emission structures can effectively cancel out each other when they are brought out of alignment which is described herein as a release force. This release force is a direct result of the particular correlation coding used to configure the magnetic field emission structures.
A person skilled in the art of coding theory will recognize that there are many different types of codes that have different correlation properties which have been used in communications for channelization purposes, energy spreading, modulation, and other purposes. Many of the basic characteristics of such codes make them applicable for use in producing the magnetic field emission structures described herein. For example, Barker codes are known for their autocorrelation properties and can be used to help configure correlated magnets. Although, a Barker code is used in an example below with respect to
Referring to
In
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In the above examples, the correlated magnets 304, 306, 402, 406, 502, 508, 604 and 610 overcome the normal ‘magnet orientation’ behavior with the aid of a holding mechanism such as an adhesive, a screw, a bolt & nut, etc. . . . In other cases, magnets of the same magnetic field emission structure could be sparsely separated from other magnets (e.g., in a sparse array) such that the magnetic forces of the individual magnets do not substantially interact, in which case the polarity of individual magnets can be varied in accordance with a code without requiring a holding mechanism to prevent magnetic forces from ‘flipping’ a magnet. However, magnets are typically close enough to one another such that their magnetic forces would substantially interact to cause at least one of them to ‘flip’ so that their moment vectors align but these magnets can be made to remain in a desired orientation by use of a holding mechanism such as an adhesive, a screw, a bolt & nut, etc. . . . . As such, correlated magnets often utilize some sort of holding mechanism to form different magnetic field emission structures which can be used in a wide-variety of applications like, for example, a drill head assembly, a hole cutting tool assembly, a machine press tool, a gripping apparatus, a slip ring mechanism, and a structural assembly. Moreover, magnetic field emission structures may include a turning mechanism, a tool insertion slot, alignment marks, a latch mechanism, a pivot mechanism, a swivel mechanism, or a lever.
C. Correlated Electromagnetics
Correlated magnets can entail the use of electromagnets which is a type of magnet in which the magnetic field is produced by the flow of an electric current. The polarity of the magnetic field is determined by the direction of the electric current and the magnetic field disappears when the current ceases. Following are a couple of examples in which arrays of electromagnets are used to produce a first magnetic field emission structure that is moved over time relative to a second magnetic field emission structure which is associated with an object thereby causing the object to move.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Multilevel Correlated Magnetic System
The present invention provides a multilevel correlated magnetic system and method for using the multilevel correlated magnetic system. It involves multilevel magnetic techniques related to those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/476,952, filed Jun. 2, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/277,214, titled “A System and Method for Contactless Attachment of Two Objects”, filed Sep. 22, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/278,900, titled “A System and Method for Contactless Attachment of Two Objects”, filed Sep. 30, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/278,767 titled “A System and Method for Contactless Attachment of Two Objects”, filed Oct. 9, 2009, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/280,094, titled “A System and Method for Producing Multi-level Magnetic Fields”, filed Oct. 16, 2009, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/281,160, titled “A System and Method for Producing Multi-level Magnetic Fields”, filed Nov. 13, 2009, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/283,780, titled “A System and Method for Producing Multi-level Magnetic Fields”, filed Dec. 9, 2009, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/284,385, titled “A System and Method for Producing Multi-level Magnetic Fields”, filed Dec. 17, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/342,988, titled “A System and Method for Producing Multi-level Magnetic Fields”, filed Apr. 22, 2010, which are all incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Such systems and methods described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/322,561, filed Feb. 4, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/479,074, 12/478,889, 12/478,939, 12/478,911, 12/478,950, 12/478,969, 12/479,013, 12/479,073, 12/479,106, filed Jun. 5, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/479,818, 12/479,820, 12/479,832, and 12/479,832, file Jun. 7, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/494,064, filed Jun. 29, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/495,462, filed Jun. 30, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/496,463, filed Jul. 1, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/499,039, filed Jul. 7, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/501,425, filed Jul. 11, 2009, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/507,015, filed Jul. 21, 2009 are all incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the multilevel correlated magnetic system includes a first correlated magnetic structure and a second correlated magnetic structure each having a first portion comprising a plurality of complementary coded magnetic sources and each having a second portion comprising one or more magnetic sources intended to only repel or to only attract. The magnetic sources employed in the invention may be permanent magnetic sources, electromagnets, electro-permanent magnets, or combinations thereof. In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, both portions of the two correlated magnetic structures may comprise a plurality of complementary coded magnetic sources. For both embodiments, when the first correlated magnetic structure is a certain separation distance apart from the second correlated magnetic structure (i.e., at a transition distance), the multilevel correlated magnetic system transitions from either a repel mode to an attract mode or from an attract mode to a repel mode. Thus, the multilevel correlated magnetic system has a repel level and an attract level.
The first portion of each of the two correlated magnetic structures, which has a plurality of coded magnetic sources, can be described as being a short range portion, and the second portion of each of the two correlated magnetic structures can be described as being a long range portion, where the short range portion and the long range portion produce opposing forces that effectively work against each other. The short range portion produces a magnetic field having a higher near field density and a lesser far field density than the magnetic field produced by the long range portion. Because of these near field and far field density differences, the short range portion produces a higher peak force than the long range portion yet has a faster field extinction rate such that the short range portion is stronger than the long range portion at separation distances less than the transition distance and weaker than the long range portion at separation distance greater than the transition distance, where the forces produced by two portions cancel each other when the two correlated magnetic structures are separated by a distance equal to the transition distance. Thus, the first and second portions of the two correlated magnetic structures produce two opposite polarity force curves corresponding to the attractive force versus the separation distance between the two correlated magnetic structures and the repulsive force versus the separation distance between the two correlated magnetic structures.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the first (short range) portions of the two correlated magnetic structures produce an attractive force and the second (long range) portions of the two correlated magnetic structures produce a repulsive force. With this arrangement, as the two complementary structures are brought near each other they initially repel each other until they are at a transition distance, where they neither attract nor repel, and then when they are brought together closer than the transition distance they begin to attract strongly, behaving as a “snap.” With this embodiment, the attraction curve is shorter range but its peak force is stronger than the longer range repulsive force curve.
In accordance with still another embodiment of the present invention, the polarities of the force curves are reversed with the shorter range, but stronger peak force curve being repulsive and the longer range but weaker peak force curve being attractive. With this arrangement, the two structures attract each other beyond the transition distance and repel each other when within the transition distance, which results in the two correlated magnetic structures achieving a contactless attachment where they are locked in relative position and in relative alignment yet they are separated by the transition distance.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the short range portion and the long range portion of the multi-level correlated magnetic system could both produce attractive forces to produce correlated magnetic structures having both a strong near field attractive force and a strong far field attractive force, where the transition point corresponds to a point at which the two attractive force curves cross. Similarly, the short range portion and the long range portion could both produce repulsive forces to produce correlated magnetic structures having both a strong near field repulsive force and a strong far field repulsive force, where the transition point corresponds to a point at which the two repulsive force curves cross.
In accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention, the two correlated magnetic field structures are attached to one or more movement constraining structures. A movement constraining structure may only allow motion of the two correlated magnetic structures to or away from each other where the two correlated magnetic structures are always parallel to each other. The movement constraining structure may not allow twisting (or rotation) of either correlated magnetic field structure. Similarly, the movement constraining structure may not allow sideways motion. Alternatively, one or more such movement constraining structures may have variable states whereby movement of the two correlated magnetic structures is constrained in some manner while in a first state but not constrained or constrained differently during another state. For example, the movement constraining structure may not allow rotation of either correlated magnetic structure while in a first state but allow rotation of one or both of the correlated magnetic structures while in another state.
One embodiment of the invention comprises a circular correlated magnetic structure having an annular ring of single polarity that surrounds a circular area within which reside an ensemble of coded magnetic sources. Under one arrangement corresponding to the snap behavior, the ensemble of coded magnetic sources would generate the shorter range, more powerful peak attractive force curve and the annular ring would generate the longer range, weaker peak repulsive force curve. Under a second arrangement corresponding to the contactless attachment behavior, these roles would be reversed.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the configuration of the circular correlated magnetic structure would be reversed, with the coded ensemble of coded magnetic sources occupying the outer annular ring and the inner circle being of a single polarity. Under one arrangement corresponding to the snap behavior, the ensemble of coded magnetic sources present in the outer annular ring would generate the shorter range, more powerful peak attractive force curve and the inner circle would generate the longer range, weaker peak repulsive force curve. Under a second arrangement corresponding to the contactless attachment behavior, these roles would be reversed.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, an additional modulating element that produces an additional magnetic field can be used to increase or decrease the transition distance of a multilevel magnetic field system 1000.
If one or more of the first portion and the second portion is implemented with electromagnets or electro-permanent magnets then a control system could be used to vary either the short range force curve or the long range force curve.
The spatial force functions used in accordance with the present invention can be designed to allow movement (e.g., rotation) of at least one of the correlated magnetic structures of the multilevel correlated magnetic system to vary either the short range force curve or the long range force curve.
Referring to
Under one arrangement, the outer portions 1004a, 1004b each comprise a plurality of magnetic sources that are complementary coded so that they will produce an attractive force when their complementary (i.e., opposite polarity) source pairs are substantially aligned and which have a sharp attractive force versus separation distance (or throw) curve, and the inner portions 1006a, 1006b also comprise a plurality of magnetic sources that are anti-complementary coded such that they produce a repulsive force when their anti-complementary (i.e., same polarity) source pairs are substantially aligned but have a broader, less sharp, repulsive force versus separation distance (or throw) curve. As such, when brought into proximity with each other and substantially aligned the first and second correlated magnetic field structures 1002a, 1002b will have a snap behavior whereby their spatial forces transition from a repulsive force to an attractive force. Alternatively, the inner portions 1006a, 1006b could each comprise multiple magnetic sources having the same polarity orientation or could each be implemented using just one magnetic source in which case a similar snap behavior would be produced.
Under another arrangement, the outer portions 1004a, 1004b each comprise a plurality of magnetic sources that are anti-complementary coded so that they will produce a repulsive force when their anti-complementary (i.e., same polarity) source pairs are substantially aligned and which have a sharp repulsive force versus separation distance (or throw) curve, and the inner portions 1006a, 1006b also comprise a plurality of magnetic sources that are complementary coded such that they produce an attractive force when their complementary (i.e., opposite polarity) source pairs are substantially aligned but have a broader, less sharp, attractive force versus separation distance (or throw) curve. As such, when brought into proximity with each other and substantially aligned the first and second correlated magnetic field structures 1002a, 1002b will have a contactless attachment behavior where they achieve equilibrium at a transition distance where their spatial forces transition from an attractive force to a repulsive force. Alternatively, the outer portions 1004a, 1004b could each comprise multiple magnetic sources having the same polarity orientation or could each be implemented using just one magnetic source in which case a similar contactless attachment behavior would be produced.
For arrangements where both the outer portions 1004a, 1004b and the inner portions 1006a, 1006b comprise a plurality of coded magnetic sources, there can be greater control over their response to movement due to the additional correlation. For example, when twisting one correlated magnetic structure relative to the other, the long range portion can be made to de-correlate at the same or similar rate as the short rate portion thereby maintaining a higher accuracy on the lock position. Alternatively, the multilevel correlated magnetic system 1000 may use a special configuration of non-coded magnetic sources as discussed in detail below with respect to
As discussed above, multiple multi-level correlated magnetic systems 1000 can be used together to provide contactless attachment of two objects 1400, 1402. For example, three or more such structures can be employed to act like magnetic “invisible legs” to hold an object in place above a surface. Similarly, two or more “snap” implementations can be used to hold an object to another object. For example, four snap multi-level structures placed in four corners of a tarp might be used to cover a square opening. Generally, different combinations of contactless attachment structures and snap structures can be combined. For example, a snap structure might secure an object to the end of a rotating shaft and contactless attachment structures could be used to maintain separation between an object being rotated over another surface. Specifically, a first circular band-like multi-level correlated magnetic structure on a bottom surface or a top surface could interact with another circular band-like multi-level correlated magnetic structure on the opposing surface or even a smaller arch (i.e., subset of one of the bands) could be used on one of the surfaces.
Under another arrangement, the “contactless” multi-level correlated magnetic system 1000 can be used as a magnetic spring or shock absorber. Such magnetic springs could be used in countless applications where they would absorb vibrations, prevent damage, etc. In particular the dissipative element of a shock absorber may be created by positioning a conductor in the magnetic field and allowing the creation of shorted eddy currents due to its motion to damp the oscillation.
Under yet another arrangement, the “contactless” multi-level correlated magnetic system 1000 can be used to make doors and drawers that are quiet since they can be designed such that doors, cabinet doors, and drawers will close and magnetically attach yet not make contact.
Under another arrangement, the “contactless” multi-level correlated magnetic system 1000 can be used for child safety and animal proof devices which require a child or animal to overcome, for example by pushing or pulling an object, a repel force before something engages. If desired, the new devices can have forms of electrical switches, mechanical latches, and the like where the repel force can be prescribed such that a child or animal would find it difficult to overcome the force while an adult would not. Such devices might optionally employ a spacer to control the amount of attractive force (if any) that the devices could achieve.
Generally, correlated magnetic structures can be useful for assisting blind people by enabling them to attach objects in known locations and orientations making them easier to locate and manipulate. Unique coding could also provide unique magnetic identifications of objects such that placing an object in the wrong location would be rejected (or disallowed).
Generator devices can be designed to incorporate the “contactless” multi-level correlated magnetic system 1000 and work with slow moving objects, for example, a wind mill, without requiring the gears currently being used to achieve adequate power generation.
One application that can incorporate the “contactless” multi-level correlated magnetic system 1000 is an anti-kick blade release mechanism for a saw whereby when a blade bites into an object, e.g., wood, such that it would become locked and would otherwise kick the blade up and/or the object out, the blade would disengage. The saw would automatically turn off upon this occurrence.
Another application of the “contactless” multi-level correlated magnetic system 1000 is with flying model aircraft which would allow portions such as wings to be easily attached to enable flying but easily detached for storage and transport.
Below are some additional ideas for devices incorporating the “contactless” multi-level correlated magnetic system 1000 technology:
Referring to
The hysteresis of the momentary snap switch 1500 can be described relative to
Referring to
Referring to
In operation, when an external force 1908 is applied to the upper magnet 1902, the repel force between the upper magnet 1902 and the middle magnet 1002 acts similar to the spring 1502 of
One skilled in the art will recognize that many different variations of the exemplary momentary switch 1900 used in the exemplary cylinder 2100 of
Under yet another arrangement, a device can be produced including multiple layers of multi-level magnetic systems 1000 including those that have repeatable hysteresis behavior.
Under another arrangement it is possible to design two magnetic structures to produce multiple layers of multi-level magnetism. Using only two magnetic structures, many different combinations of magnetized regions can be produced.
It should be noted that multilevel structures 2902 and 2904 do not have to be symmetrical and do not need to be circular (e.g., involving concentric circular regions). Multi-level magnetism can be achieved using coding that resembles stripes, coding corresponding to irregular patterns, coding correspond to stripes within circles, and using countless other coding arrangements.
Generally, a laptop 3002 configured in accordance with the multi-level aspects of the present invention could have the following:
Laptops, phones, personal digital assistants (PDAs) and other similar devices could also employ the aforementioned correlated magnetics technology in other ways including:
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the repel-snap multi-level correlated magnetic system 1000 (for example) can be used to produce child safety and animal proof devices that require a child or animal to be able to overcome the repel force in order to engage or disengage a locking mechanism, or other such mechanism. The force may be applied via pulling or pushing or in some other manner. Such a device could make it difficult for a child or an animal to turn on a device, for example, a garbage disposal.
As can be appreciated, the repel-snap multi-level correlated magnetic system 1000 (for example) can be used in many different child safety and animal proof devices. By requiring a child or animal to overcome, for example by pushing or pulling an object, a repel force before something engages, for example electrically or mechanically, new forms of electrical switches, latches, and the like can be employed where the repel force can be prescribed such that a child or animal would find it difficult to overcome the force while an adult would not. Such devices might optionally employ a spacer to control the amount of attractive force (if any) that the devices could achieve thereby enabling them to be removed with a force (e.g., pull force) opposite the force used to achieve contact (e.g., push force). If desired, the repel-snap multi-level correlated magnetic system 1000 (for example) may be coded whereby they do not de-correlate when one of the corresponding magnetic structures 1002a and 1002b is rotated relative to the other or it may be coded where de-correlation will occur when alignment is changed due to rotation (and/or translational movement). Thus, the force between two multi-level magnetic structures 1002a and 1002b can vary as a function of separation distance and also relative alignment of the two structures 1002a and 1002b.
The following discussion is intended to compare the limitations of conventional magnet force curves to those of coded magnetic structures. Conventional magnet pairs will either attract each other or repel each other depending on the spatial orientation of their dipoles. Conventional magnets can have strong magnetic fields that can adversely affect credit cards, cell phones, pacemakers, etc. because of the linear reach of the magnetic fields. For the same reason, these magnets can also be very dangerous to handle. Moreover, magnet designs have been limited by the assumption of an indirect relationship, which describes the force as inversely proportional to the linear distance between the magnets. Because of this limitation, design engineers have long relied on materials science and advanced manufacturing techniques to produce magnets with appropriate attract and/or repel force performance characteristics required for particular applications.
The force curve shown in
The far-left cylinder 3602 features two conventional magnets that exhibit a progressively-stiffer resistance as the magnets approach contact. The other three cylinders 3604 (repel and snap 175V), 3606 (repel and snap 200V) and 3608 (repel and snap w/spacer) each feature multi-level repel and snap programmed magnet pairs that provide a progressively stiffer resistance up to an inflection point at approximately 6/10 of an inch from surface contact. At this point, the resistive force declines and actually transitions to an attract force at approximately two-tenths of an inch from surface contact, where the magnet pair then snap together and bond. The difference in resistance offered by the higher and lower power attract-force codes can be noticeably felt. The far-right cylinder 3608 illustrates a ‘breakaway cushion’ behavior. The cylinder travel is limited by a spacer such that the magnet pair cannot enter the attract force region. The net effect is that the repel force declines to near zero, yet the cylinder will return to its starting position when released. Thus, new cushioning devices can be designed to give way after a prescribed force is reached.
Because force curves are now programmable, designers can tailor the magnetic behavior to match application requirements and to support new magnet applications. Magnets may now include combinations of attract and repel forces that enable entirely new application areas. Programming magnets and their force curves provides a powerful new capability for product innovation and increased efficiencies across industry. Generally, a plurality of regions having different force curves can be configured to work together to produce a tailored composite force curve. The composite force curve could, for example, have a flat portion that represented a constant force over some range of separation distance such that the devices acted similar to a very long spring. Moreover, as previously described, maxels can be printed onto conventional magnets thereby putting surface fields onto them. By putting a thin correlated magnetic layer on top of an already magnetized substrate the bulk field is projected into the far field and the correlated magnetic surface effects modify the force curve in the near field.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the multi-level contactless attachment devices can be used to make doors and drawers that are quiet since they can be designed such that doors, cabinet doors, and drawers will close and magnetically attach yet not make contact.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, an external force applied to at least one magnetic structure making up a multi-level device may change as a result of heat, pressure, or some other external factor other than physical force. For example, a bimetallic strip connected to a multi-level device may be used to produce the desired hysteresis of a thermostat or of a first suppression system trigger device. Similarly, pressure might cause a multi-level device to go from a close position to an open position enabling gas to escape a vessel.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, the ability to vary the forces between two magnetic structures in a non-linear manner by varying their relative alignment and via multi-level magnetism that varies as a function of separation distance enables entirely new types of simple machines that include the six classical simple machines (i.e., lever, wheel and axle, pulley, inclined plane, wedge, and screw). Generally new non-linear design dimensions enable force characteristics to be varied for given distances and alignments. Furthermore, new types of complex machines are now possible based on combinations of new simple machines.
From the foregoing, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention includes a multilevel correlated magnetic system comprising: (a) a first correlated magnetic structure including a first portion which has a plurality of coded magnetic sources and a second portion which has one or more magnetic sources; (b) a second correlated magnetic structure including a first portion which has a plurality of complementary coded magnetic sources and a second portion which has one or more magnetic sources; (c) wherein the first correlated magnetic structure is aligned with the second correlated magnetic structure such that the first portions and the second portions are respectively located across from one another; and (d) wherein the first portions each produce a higher peak force than the second portions while the first portions each have a faster field extinction rate than the second portions such that (1) the first portions produce a magnetic force that is cancelled by a magnetic force produced by the second portions when the first and second correlated magnetic structures are separated by a distance equal to a transition distance, (2) the first portions produce a stronger magnetic force than the magnetic force produced by the second portions when the first and second correlated magnetic structures have a separation distance from one another that is less than the transition distance, and (3) the first portions have a weaker magnetic force than the magnetic force produced by second portions when the separation distance between the first and second correlated magnetic structures is greater than the transition distance.
In one example, the first correlated magnetic structure's plurality of coded magnetic sources include first field emission sources and the second correlated magnetic structure's plurality of complementary coded magnetic sources include second field emission sources, each field emission sources having positions and polarities relating to a desired spatial force function that corresponds to a relative alignment of the first and second correlated magnetic structures within a field domain, wherein the spatial force function being in accordance with a code, where the code corresponding to a code modulo of the first field emission sources and a complementary code modulo of the second field emission sources. The code defining a peak spatial force corresponding to a substantial alignment of the code modulo of the first field emission sources with the complementary code modulo of the second field emission sources, wherein the code also defining a plurality of off peak spatial forces corresponding to a plurality of different misalignments of the code modulo of the first field emission sources and the complementary code modulo of the second field emission sources, wherein the plurality of off peak spatial forces having a largest off peak spatial force, where the largest off peak spatial force being less than half of the peak spatial force.
The pulsed magnetic field generation systems described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/476,952, filed Jun. 2, 2009, titled “A field emission system and method”, which is incorporated herein by reference, produces magnetic sources called maxels. The magnetization of the maxels depends on many factors including the grade of magnetizable material, the sintering of the material, the size and other characteristics of the magnetizing inductor (or print head), the thickness of the material, the current used to magnetize the maxel, and so on. To achieve a maxel having a desired diameter, one may have to lower the current used since once the material being magnetized becomes saturated at the maxel location, additional magnetization will cause the maxel to expand or bleed outward causing it to have a larger diameter. In accordance with the invention, additional magnetizable material can be placed in contact with the material being magnetized to enable a high current to be applied so that any excess magnetization will transition into the additional magnetizable material. Additionally, various alternative approaches exist for affecting the magnetization of a maxel including having a template beneath the material having predefined magnetization characteristics, having external magnetic field sources intended to bias (or steer) the magnetization of a maxel, having various combinations of abruptly saturable shielding materials (e,g., Permalloy) and/or slowly saturating shielding materials like iron or steel.
It is desirable to have cylindrically shaped magnetizable material that could be magnetized where the domain alignment would be radially symmetric from the center of the cylinder much like spokes on a wagon wheel. Such material could then be fully magnetized using the pulsed magnetic field generation system (i.e., the magnetizer) of the invention to produce a pattern of maxels around the outside of the cylinder without requiring variation of the current used to produce each maxel. However, if cylindrically shaped magnetizable material is fabricated to have diametric domain alignment then one can take into account the angle of the domain alignment of the material to the direction of magnetization by the magnetizer print head and vary the current of the maxels to normalize maxel field strengths, for example, half the current might be applied along the direction (or axis) of domain alignment than is applied ninety degrees off the axis of domain alignment.
One application of correlated magnets is an anti-kick blade release mechanism for a saw whereby when a blade bites into an object, e.g., wood, such that it would become locked and would otherwise kick the blade up and/or the object out, the blade would disengage. The saw could also be made to automatically turn off upon this occurrence.
Another application of correlated magnets is with flying model aircraft which would allow portions such as wings to be easily attached to enable flying but easily detached for storage and transport.
Below are some additional ideas for devices incorporating correlated magnetics technology.
Although multiple embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated in the accompanying Drawings and described in the foregoing Detailed Description, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications and substitutions without departing from the invention as set forth and defined by the following claims. It should also be noted that the reference to the “present invention” or “invention” used herein relates to exemplary embodiments and not necessarily to every embodiment that is encompassed by the appended claims.
This patent application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/061,956, filed Oct. 24, 2013, now pending, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/892,246, filed May 11, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,570,130, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/465,001, filed May 6, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,471,658, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/179,759, filed Jul. 11, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,174,347, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/399,448 (filed Jul. 12, 2010) and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 12/885,450 (filed Sep. 18, 2010), now U.S. Pat. No. 7,982,568. The contents of these documents are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
93931 | Westcott | Aug 1869 | A |
342666 | Williams | May 1886 | A |
361248 | Winton | Apr 1887 | A |
400809 | Van Depoele | Apr 1889 | A |
405109 | Williams | May 1889 | A |
450543 | Van Depoele | Apr 1891 | A |
493858 | Edison | Mar 1893 | A |
675323 | Clark | May 1901 | A |
687292 | Armstrong | Nov 1901 | A |
996933 | Lindquist | Jul 1911 | A |
1024418 | Podlesak | Apr 1912 | A |
1081462 | Patton | Dec 1913 | A |
1171351 | Neuland | Feb 1916 | A |
1180489 | Geist | Apr 1916 | A |
1184056 | Deventer | May 1916 | A |
1236234 | Troje | Aug 1917 | A |
1252289 | Murray, Jr. | Jan 1918 | A |
1290190 | Herrick | Jan 1919 | A |
1301135 | Karasick | Apr 1919 | A |
1307342 | Brown | Jun 1919 | A |
1312546 | Karasick | Aug 1919 | A |
1323546 | Karasick | Aug 1919 | A |
1554236 | Simmons | Jan 1920 | A |
1343751 | Simmons | Jun 1920 | A |
1544010 | Jordan | Jun 1925 | A |
1554254 | Zbinden | Sep 1925 | A |
1624741 | Leppke et al. | Dec 1926 | A |
1784256 | Stout | Dec 1930 | A |
1785643 | Noack et al. | Dec 1930 | A |
1823326 | Legg | Sep 1931 | A |
1895129 | Jones | Jan 1933 | A |
1975175 | Scofield | Oct 1934 | A |
2048161 | Klaiber | Jul 1936 | A |
2058339 | Metzger | Oct 1936 | A |
2147482 | Butler | Dec 1936 | A |
2111643 | Salvatori | Mar 1938 | A |
2130213 | Wolf et al. | Sep 1938 | A |
2158132 | Legg | May 1939 | A |
2186074 | Koller | Jan 1940 | A |
2240035 | Catherall | Apr 1941 | A |
2243555 | Faus | May 1941 | A |
2245268 | Goss et al. | Jun 1941 | A |
2269149 | Edgar | Jan 1942 | A |
2286897 | Costa et al. | Jun 1942 | A |
2296754 | Wolf et al. | Sep 1942 | A |
2315045 | Breitenstein | Mar 1943 | A |
2316616 | Powell | Apr 1943 | A |
2327748 | Smith | Aug 1943 | A |
2337248 | Koller | Dec 1943 | A |
2337249 | Koller | Dec 1943 | A |
2362151 | Ostenberg | Nov 1944 | A |
2389298 | Ellis | Nov 1945 | A |
2401887 | Sheppard | Jun 1946 | A |
2409857 | Hines et al. | Oct 1946 | A |
2414653 | Lokholder | Jan 1947 | A |
2426322 | Pridham | Aug 1947 | A |
2438231 | Shultz | Mar 1948 | A |
2471634 | Vennice | May 1949 | A |
2472127 | Slason | Jun 1949 | A |
2475200 | Roys | Jul 1949 | A |
2475456 | Norlander | Jul 1949 | A |
2483895 | Fisher | Oct 1949 | A |
2508305 | Teetor | May 1950 | A |
2513226 | Wylie | Jun 1950 | A |
2514927 | Bernhard | Jul 1950 | A |
2520828 | Bertschi | Aug 1950 | A |
2540796 | Stanton | Feb 1951 | A |
2544077 | Gardner | Mar 1951 | A |
2565624 | Phelon | Aug 1951 | A |
2570625 | Zimmerman et al. | Oct 1951 | A |
2640955 | Fisher | Jun 1953 | A |
2690349 | Teetor | Sep 1954 | A |
2694164 | Geppelt | Nov 1954 | A |
2694613 | Williams | Nov 1954 | A |
2701158 | Schmitt | Feb 1955 | A |
2722617 | Cluwen et al. | Nov 1955 | A |
2740946 | Geneslay | Apr 1956 | A |
2770759 | Ahlgren | Nov 1956 | A |
2787719 | Thomas | Apr 1957 | A |
2820411 | Park | Jan 1958 | A |
2825863 | Krupen | Mar 1958 | A |
2837366 | Loeb | Jun 1958 | A |
2842688 | Martin | Jul 1958 | A |
2853331 | Teetor | Sep 1958 | A |
2888291 | Scott et al. | May 1959 | A |
2896991 | Martin, Jr. | Jul 1959 | A |
2900592 | Baruch | Aug 1959 | A |
2935352 | Heppner | May 1960 | A |
2935353 | Loeb | May 1960 | A |
2936437 | Fraser et al. | May 1960 | A |
2959747 | Challacombe et al. | Nov 1960 | A |
2962318 | Teetor | Nov 1960 | A |
3024374 | Stauder | Mar 1962 | A |
3055999 | Lucas | Sep 1962 | A |
3089986 | Gauthier | May 1963 | A |
3100292 | Warner, Jr. et al. | Aug 1963 | A |
3102205 | Combs | Aug 1963 | A |
3102314 | Alderfer | Sep 1963 | A |
3105153 | James, Jr. | Sep 1963 | A |
3149255 | Trench | Sep 1964 | A |
3151902 | Ahlgren | Oct 1964 | A |
3204995 | Teetor | Sep 1965 | A |
3208296 | Baermann | Sep 1965 | A |
3238399 | Johanees et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3273104 | Krol | Sep 1966 | A |
3288511 | Tavano | Nov 1966 | A |
3301091 | Reese | Jan 1967 | A |
3351368 | Sweet | Nov 1967 | A |
3382386 | Schlaeppi | May 1968 | A |
3408104 | Raynes | Oct 1968 | A |
3414309 | Tresemer | Dec 1968 | A |
3425729 | Bisbing | Feb 1969 | A |
2932545 | Foley | Apr 1969 | A |
3468576 | Beyer et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3474366 | Barney | Oct 1969 | A |
3496871 | Stengel | Feb 1970 | A |
3500090 | Baermann | Mar 1970 | A |
3521216 | Tolegian | Jul 1970 | A |
3645650 | Laing | Feb 1972 | A |
3668670 | Andersen | Jun 1972 | A |
3684992 | Huguet et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3690393 | Guy | Sep 1972 | A |
3696251 | Last et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3696258 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3707924 | Barthalon et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3790197 | Parker | Feb 1974 | A |
3791309 | Baermann | Feb 1974 | A |
3802034 | Bookless | Apr 1974 | A |
3803433 | Ingenito | Apr 1974 | A |
3808577 | Mathauser | Apr 1974 | A |
3836801 | Yamashita et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3845430 | Petkewicz et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3893059 | Nowak | Jul 1975 | A |
3976316 | Laby | Aug 1976 | A |
4079558 | Forham | Mar 1978 | A |
4114305 | Wohlert et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4115040 | Knorr | Sep 1978 | A |
4117431 | Eicher | Sep 1978 | A |
4129187 | Wengryn et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4129846 | Yablochnikov | Dec 1978 | A |
4140932 | Wohlert | Feb 1979 | A |
4209905 | Gillings | Jul 1980 | A |
4222489 | Hutter | Sep 1980 | A |
4232535 | Caldwell | Nov 1980 | A |
4296394 | Ragheb | Oct 1981 | A |
4340833 | Sudo et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4352960 | Dormer et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4363980 | Petersen | Dec 1982 | A |
4399595 | Yoon et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4416127 | Gomez-Olea Naveda | Nov 1983 | A |
4421118 | Dow et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4451811 | Hoffman | May 1984 | A |
4453294 | Morita | Jun 1984 | A |
4454426 | Benson | Jun 1984 | A |
4460855 | Kelly | Jul 1984 | A |
4500827 | Merritt et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4517483 | Hucker et al. | May 1985 | A |
4535278 | Asakawa | Aug 1985 | A |
4547756 | Miller et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4629131 | Podell | Dec 1986 | A |
4645283 | MacDonald et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4649925 | Dow et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4680494 | Grosjean | Jul 1987 | A |
381968 | Tesla | May 1988 | A |
4767378 | Obermann | Aug 1988 | A |
4785816 | Dow et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4808955 | Godkin et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4814654 | Gerfast | Mar 1989 | A |
4837539 | Baker | Jun 1989 | A |
4849749 | Fukamachi et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4856631 | Okamoto et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4912727 | Schubert | Mar 1990 | A |
4924123 | Hamajima et al. | May 1990 | A |
4941236 | Sherman et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4956625 | Cardone et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4980593 | Edmundson | Dec 1990 | A |
4993950 | Mensor, Jr. | Feb 1991 | A |
4996457 | Hawsey et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5013949 | Mabe, Jr. | May 1991 | A |
5020625 | Yamauchi et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5050276 | Pemberton | Sep 1991 | A |
5062855 | Rincoe | Nov 1991 | A |
5123843 | Van der Zel et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5139383 | Polyak et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5179307 | Porter | Jan 1993 | A |
5190325 | Doss-Desouza | Mar 1993 | A |
5302929 | Kovacs | Apr 1994 | A |
5309680 | Kiel | May 1994 | A |
5345207 | Gebele | Sep 1994 | A |
5347186 | Konotchick | Sep 1994 | A |
5349258 | Leupold et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5367891 | Furuyama | Nov 1994 | A |
5383049 | Carr | Jan 1995 | A |
5394132 | Poil | Feb 1995 | A |
5396140 | Goldie et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5425763 | Stemmann | Jun 1995 | A |
5434549 | Hirabayashi et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440997 | Crowley | Aug 1995 | A |
5452663 | Berdut | Sep 1995 | A |
5461386 | Knebelkamp | Oct 1995 | A |
5485435 | Matsuda et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5492572 | Schroeder et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495221 | Post | Feb 1996 | A |
5512732 | Yagnik et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5570084 | Ritter et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5582522 | Johnson | Dec 1996 | A |
5604960 | Good | Feb 1997 | A |
5631093 | Perry et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631618 | Trumper et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633555 | Ackermann et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635889 | Stelter | Jun 1997 | A |
5637972 | Randall et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5650681 | DeLerno | Jul 1997 | A |
5730155 | Allen | Mar 1998 | A |
5759054 | Spadafore | Jun 1998 | A |
5788493 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5789878 | Kroeker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5818132 | Konotchick | Oct 1998 | A |
5852393 | Reznik et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5902185 | Kubiak et al. | May 1999 | A |
5921357 | Starkovich et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935155 | Humayun et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956778 | Godoy | Sep 1999 | A |
5975714 | Vetorino et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983406 | Meyerrose | Nov 1999 | A |
5988336 | Wendt et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000484 | Zoretich et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6039759 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6040642 | Ishiyama | Mar 2000 | A |
6047456 | Yao et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6072251 | Markle | Jun 2000 | A |
6074420 | Eaton | Jun 2000 | A |
6104108 | Hazelton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115849 | Meyerrose | Sep 2000 | A |
6118271 | Ely et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120283 | Cousins | Sep 2000 | A |
6125955 | Zoretich et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142779 | Siegel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157100 | Mielke | Dec 2000 | A |
6170131 | Shin | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181110 | Lampis | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187041 | Garonzik | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188147 | Hazelton et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205012 | Lear | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210033 | Karkos, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224374 | Mayo | May 2001 | B1 |
6234833 | Tsai et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6273918 | Yuhasz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275778 | Shimada et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285097 | Hazelton et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313551 | Hazelton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6313552 | Boast | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6387096 | Hyde, Jr. | May 2002 | B1 |
6422533 | Harms | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6457179 | Prendergast | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467326 | Garrigus | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478681 | Overaker et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6517560 | Toth et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540515 | Tanaka | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6561815 | Schmidt | May 2003 | B1 |
6599321 | Hyde, Jr. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607304 | Lake et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6608540 | Hones et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6652278 | Honkura et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653919 | Shih-Chung et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6720698 | Galbraith | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6747537 | Mosteller | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6768230 | Cheung et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6821126 | Neidlein | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6841910 | Gery | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6842332 | Rubenson et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847134 | Frissen et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850139 | Dettmann et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862748 | Prendergast | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6913471 | Smith | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6927657 | Wu | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6936937 | Tu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950279 | Sasaki et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952060 | Goldner et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954938 | Emberty et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954968 | Sitbon | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6971147 | Halstead | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7009874 | Deak | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016492 | Pan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7031160 | Tillotson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033400 | Currier | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7065860 | Aoki et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066739 | McLeish | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066778 | Kretzschmar | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7097461 | Neidlein | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7101374 | Hyde, Jr. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7134452 | Hiroshi et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135792 | Devaney et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7137727 | Joseph et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7186265 | Sharkawy et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7224252 | Meadow, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7264479 | Lee | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7276025 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7309934 | Tu et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7311526 | Rohrbach et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7339790 | Baker et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7344380 | Neidlein et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351066 | DiFonzo et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7358724 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362018 | Kulogo et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7364433 | Neidlein | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381181 | Lau et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402175 | Azar | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7416414 | Bozzone et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7438726 | Erb | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444683 | Prendergast et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7453341 | Hildenbrand | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7467948 | Lindberg et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7498914 | Miyashita et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7583500 | Ligtenberg et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7628173 | Rosko et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637746 | Lindberg et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7645143 | Rohrbach et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7658613 | Griffin et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7688036 | Yarger et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7762817 | Ligtenberg et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7775567 | Ligtenberg et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7796002 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799281 | Cook et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7808349 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7812697 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817004 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7828556 | Rodrigues | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7832897 | Ku | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837032 | Smeltzer | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7839246 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7843297 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7868721 | Fullerton et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7871272 | Firman, II et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874856 | Schriefer et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7901216 | Rohrbach et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7903397 | McCoy | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7905626 | Shantha et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7980268 | Rosko et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7997906 | Ligtenberg et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8002585 | Zhou | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8004792 | Biskeborn et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009001 | Cleveland | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8050714 | Fadell et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8078224 | Fadell et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8078776 | Novotney et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8087939 | Rohrbach et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8138868 | Arnold | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8138869 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8143982 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8143983 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8165634 | Fadell et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8177560 | Rohrbach et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8187006 | Rudisill et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8190205 | Fadell et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8242868 | Lauder et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8253518 | Lauder et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8264310 | Lauder et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8264314 | Sankar | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271038 | Fadell et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271705 | Novotney et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8297367 | Chen et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8344836 | Lauder et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8348678 | Hardisty et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8354767 | Pennander et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8390411 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8390412 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8390413 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8395465 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8398409 | Schmidt | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8435042 | Rohrbach et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8454372 | Lee et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8467829 | Fadell et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8497753 | DiFonzo et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8514042 | Lauder et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8535088 | Gao et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8576031 | Lauder et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8576034 | Bilbrey et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8586410 | Arnold et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8616362 | Browne et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8648679 | Lauder et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8665044 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8665045 | Lauder et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8690582 | Rohrbach et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702316 | DiFonzo et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8734024 | Isenhour et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8752200 | Varshavsky et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8757893 | Isenhour et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8770857 | DiFonzo et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8774577 | Benjamin et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781273 | Benjamin et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20020125977 | VanZoest | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030170976 | Molla et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179880 | Pan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187510 | Hyde | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040003487 | Reiter | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040155748 | Steingroever | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040244636 | Meadow et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251759 | Hirzel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050102802 | Sitbon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050196484 | Khoshnevis | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231046 | Aoshima | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240263 | Fogarty et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050263549 | Scheiner | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060066428 | McCarthy et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060111191 | Wise | May 2006 | A1 |
20060189259 | Park et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060198047 | Xue et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214756 | Elliott et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060290451 | Prendergast et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293762 | Schulman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070072476 | Milan | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075594 | Sadler | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103266 | Wang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138806 | Ligtenberg et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070255400 | Parravicini et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070267929 | Pulnikov et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080139261 | Cho et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080181804 | Tanigawa et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186683 | Ligtenberg et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080218299 | Arnold | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080224806 | Ogden et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080272868 | Prendergast et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282517 | Claro | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090021333 | Fiedler | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090058201 | Brennvall | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090091195 | Hyde et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090146508 | Peng et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090209173 | Arledge et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090230786 | Liu | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090250576 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090251256 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254196 | Cox et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278642 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289090 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289749 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292371 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100033280 | Bird et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100084928 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100126857 | Polwart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100167576 | Zhou | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110026203 | Ligtenberg et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110210636 | Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110234344 | Fullerton et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110248806 | Michael | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110279206 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120007704 | Nerl | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120085753 | Fitch et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120235519 | Dyer et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120262261 | Sarai | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130001745 | Iwaki | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130186209 | Herbst | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130186473 | Mankame et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130186807 | Browne et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130187538 | Herbst | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130192860 | Puzio et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130207758 | Browne et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130252375 | Yi et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130256274 | Faulkner | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130270056 | Mankame et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130305705 | AC et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130341137 | Mandame et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140044972 | Menassa et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140072261 | Isenhour et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140152252 | Wood et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140205235 | Benjamin et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140221741 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1615573 | May 2005 | CN |
2938782 | Apr 1981 | DE |
0 345 554 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0 545 737 | Jun 1993 | EP |
823395 | Jan 1938 | FR |
1 495 677 | Dec 1977 | GB |
60-091011 | May 1985 | JP |
WO-0231945 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-2007081830 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2009124030 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO-2010141324 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,994 dated Aug. 8, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,219 dated Aug. 13, 2013. |
Atallah, K., Calverley, S.D., D. Howe, 2004, “Design, analysis and realisation of a high-performance magnetic gear”, IEE Proc.-Electr. Power Appl., vol. 151, No. 2, Mar. 2004. |
Atallah, K., Howe, D. 2001, “A Novel High-Performance Magnetic Gear”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 4, Jul. 2001, p. 2844-46. |
Bassani, R., 2007, “Dynamic Stability of Passive Magnetic Bearings”, Nonlinear Dynamics, V. 50, p. 161-8. |
Boston Gear 221S-4, One-stage Helical Gearbox, http://www.bostongear.com/pdf/product—sections/200—series—helical.pdf, referenced Jun. 2010. |
Charpentier et al., 2001, “Mechanical Behavior of Axially Magnetized Permanent-Magnet Gears”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 3, May 2001, p. 1110-17. |
Chau et al., 2008, “Transient Analysis of Coaxial Magnetic Gears Using Finite Element Comodeling”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103. |
Choi et al., 2010, “Optimization of Magnetization Directions in a 3-D Magnetic Structure”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 46, No. 6, Jun. 2010, p. 1603-06. |
Correlated Magnetics Research, 2009, Online Video, “Innovative Magnetics Research in Huntsville”, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4m81JjZCJo. |
Correlated Magnetics Research, 2009, Online Video, “Non-Contact Attachment Utilizing Permanent Magnets”, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xUm25CNNgQ. |
Correlated Magnetics Research, 2010, Company Website, http://www.correlatedmagnetics.com. |
Furlani 1996, “Analysis and optimization of synchronous magnetic couplings”, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 79, No. 8, p. 4692. |
Furlani 2001, “Permanent Magnet and Electromechanical Devices”, Academic Press, San Diego. |
Furlani, E.P., 2000, “Analytical analysis of magnetically coupled multipole cylinders”, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol. 33, No. 1, p. 28-33. |
General Electric DP 2.7 Wind Turbine Gearbox, http://www.gedrivetrain.com/insideDP27.cfm, referenced Jun. 2010. |
Ha et al., 2002, “Design and Characteristic Analysis of Non-Contact Magnet Gear for Conveyor by Using Permanent Magnet”, Conf. Record of the 2002 IEEE Industry Applications Conference, p. 1922-17. |
Huang et al., 2008, “Development of a Magnetic Planetary Gearbox”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 44, No. 3, p. 403-12. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in Application No. PCT/US12/61938 dated Feb. 26, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in Application No. PCT/US2013/028095 dated May 13, 2013. |
Jian et al., “Comparison of Coaxial Magnetic Gears With Different Topologies”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 45, No. 10, Oct. 2009, p. 4526-29. |
Jian, L., Chau, K.T., 2010, “A Coaxial Magnetic Gear With Halbach Permanent-Magnet Arrays”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 25, No. 2, Jun. 2010, p. 319-28. |
Jørgensen et al., “The Cycloid Permanent Magnetic Gear”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 44, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2008, p. 1659-65. |
Jørgensen et al., 2005, “Two dimensional model of a permanent magnet spur gear”, Conf. Record of the 2005 IEEE Industry Applications Conference, p. 261-65. |
Krasil'nikov et al., 2008, “Calculation of the Shear Force of Highly Coercive Permanent Magnets in Magnetic Systems With Consideration of Affiliation to a Certain Group Based on Residual Induction”, Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, vol. 44, Nos. 7-8, p. 362-65. |
Krasil'nikov et al., 2009, “Torque Determination for a Cylindrical Magnetic Clutch”, Russian Engineering Research, vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 544-47. |
Liu et al., 2009, “Design and Analysis of Interior-magnet Outer-rotor Concentric Magnetic Gears”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105. |
Lorimer, W., Hartman, A., 1997, “Magnetization Pattern for Increased Coupling in Magnetic Clutches”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 33, No. 5, Sep. 1997. |
Mezani, S., Atallah, K., Howe, D. , 2006, “A high-performance axial-field magnetic gear”, Journal of Applied Physics vol. 99. |
MI, “Magnetreater/Charger Model 580” Magnetic Instruments Inc. Product specification, May 4, 2009, http://web.archive.org/web/20090504064511/http://www.maginst.com/specifications/580—magnetreater.htm, 2 pages. |
Neugart PLE-160, One-Stage Planetary Gearbox, http://www.neugartusa.com/ple—160—gb.pdf, referenced Jun. 2010. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/471,189 dated Apr. 3, 2013. |
Tsurumoto 1992, “Basic Analysis on Transmitted Force of Magnetic Gear Using Permanent Magnet”, IEEE Translation Journal on Magnetics in Japan, Vo 7, No. 6, Jun. 1992, p. 447-52. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,393 dated Apr. 4, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/236,413 dated Jun. 6, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/374,074 dated Feb. 21, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,994 dated Jan. 7, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/529,520 dated Sep. 28,2012. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/530,893 dated Mar. 22, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/855,519 dated Jul. 17, 2013. |
Series BNS, Compatible Series AES Safety Controllers, http://www.schmersalusa.com/safety—controllers/drawings/aes.pdf, pp. 159-175, date unknown. |
BNS 33 Range, Magnetic safety sensors, Rectangular design, http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/36449.pdf, 3 pages, date unknown. |
Series BNS-B20, Coded-Magnet Sensor Safety Door Handle, http://www.schmersalusa.com/catalog—pdfs/BNS—B20.pdf, 2 pages, date unknown. |
Series BNS333, Coded-Magnet Sensors with Integral Safety Control Module, http://www.schmersalusa.com/machine—guarding/coded—magnet/drawings/bns333.pdf, 2 pages, date unknown. |
Wikipedia, “Barker Code”, Web article, last modified Aug. 2, 2008, 2 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Kasami Code”, Web article, last modified Jun. 11, 2008, 1 page. |
Wikipedia, “Linear feedback shift register”, Web article, last modified Nov. 11, 2008, 6 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Golomb Ruler”, Web article, last modified Nov. 4, 2008, 3 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Costas Array”, Web article, last modified Oct. 7, 2008, 4 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Walsh Code”, Web article, last modified Sep. 17, 2008, 2 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Gold Code”, Web article, last modified Jul. 27, 2008, 1 page. |
Wikipedia, “Bitter Electromagnet”, Web article, last modified Aug. 2011,1 page. |
Pill-soo Kim, “A future cost trends of magnetizer systems in Korea”, Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation, 1996, vol. 2, Aug. 5, 1996, pp. 991-996. |
United States Office Action, dated Aug. 26, 2011, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,270. |
United States Office Action, dated Mar. 12, 2012, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,270. |
United States Office Action, dated Feb. 22, 2011, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/476,952. |
United States Office Action, dated Oct. 12, 2011, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/476,952. |
United States Office Action, dated Mar. 9, 2012, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 13/371,280. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated May 14, 2009, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2009/038925. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 13, 2010, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/021612. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 1, 2009, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2009/002027. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 18, 2010, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/036443. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 8, 2011 issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/049410. |
C. Pompermaier, L. Sjoberg, and G. Nord, Design and Optimization of a Permanent Magnet Transverse Flux Machine, XXth International Conference on Electrical Machines, Sep. 2012, p. 606, IEEE Catalog No. CFP1290B-PRT, ISBN: 978-1-4673-0143-5. |
V. Rudnev, An Objective Assessment of Magnetic Flux Concentrators, Heat Treating Progress, Nov./Dec. 2004, p. 19-23. |
Kim, Pill Soo, Kim, Yong, Field and Thermal Modeling of Magnetizing Fixture by Impulse, Power Electronics and Drive Systems, 2003. The fifth conference on, Dec. 2003, 1301-1306. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150102880 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61399448 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14061956 | Oct 2013 | US |
Child | 14578349 | US | |
Parent | 13892246 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 14061956 | US | |
Parent | 13465001 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 13892246 | US | |
Parent | 13179759 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 13465001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12885450 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 13179759 | US |