Flare apparatuses in the form of a flare stack and one or more burners or ground-level flares in earthen pits are known and are used for burning combustible gases. Flare apparatuses are commonly used for disposing of flammable waste gases or other flammable gas streams in oil and gas production and refining, chemical plants, pipelines, liquefied petroleum and natural gas terminals, etc.
For example, oil and gas wells are tested by burning or “flaring” well fluid at the surface. The well fluid may be comprised of hydrocarbon gases, such as natural gas, oil and formation water. The term “wet gas” is commonly used for such well fluids. One problem associated with flaring of wet gas on offshore platforms is the radiant heat produced by flaring the wet gas and the effect of the radiant heat on the personnel and equipment disposed on the platform. Other problems include smoke formation and hydrocarbon fallout.
Specifically, it is generally desirable that the wet gas be flared without producing smoke and typically such smokeless or substantially smokeless flaring is mandated by regulatory agencies. Fallout of unburned hydrocarbons can occur when the wet gas being flared does not burn completely or cleanly. The resulting smoke and unburned hydrocarbon fallout may create both environmental and safety concerns as the unburned hydrocarbons may be disposed in liquid droplets that ultimately fall out of the ambient air onto the surface of the platform or the ocean.
Smokeless and fallout-free flaring of wet gas can be achieved by supplying additional air (i.e., air-assisted flaring) or steam (i.e., steam-assisted flaring) to the burner, which can result in a complete oxidation of the wet gas. However, at high flow rates of the wet gas, providing the optimal supply of air or steam for premixing upstream of the burner through pumps or blowers can become impractical or impossible, especially on offshore platforms or remotely located land-based drilling rigs. In contrast, when a highly turbulent jet of combustible wet gas is created in an open-air burner that does not require premixing, most of the requisite combustion air can be obtained from the ambient atmosphere near the flame. The design of such open-air burners is based on a maximum entrainment of ambient air into a high-pressure jet emitted through the burner head.
Further, the use of open-air burners for the combustion of wet gas would require spraying or atomizing of the liquid component that is carried by the input flow. The atomizing would be followed by mixing of the gas and atomized liquid with ambient air, which would create a mix suitable for clean flaring. While known atomizing nozzles are efficient if high-pressure gas and liquid flow are supplied through separate ducts, the wet gas for gas flaring at a rig site is a mixture of gas and liquid delivered to a flare apparatus together and in time-variable and unpredictable proportions. As a result, existing atomization nozzles cannot be used for oil and gas flaring without a gas/liquid separator, which is impractical for most offshore platforms and many land based well sites. Further, existing atomization nozzles are noisy, which adversely affects the safety and working environment of an offshore platform or a land-based well site.
Thus, wet gas burners are required that significantly reduce heat radiation and pollutants in the form of smoke and fallout that result from incomplete combustion, that can operate under a wide range of input pressures and that can operate with a reduced noise level.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
A multiphase burner is disclosed that is capable of flaring wet gas or a gas stream that includes a liquid fraction without producing smoke, particulates or hydrocarbon fallout. The disclosed multiphase burner may include a hollow base that has a central axis and a proximal end that may serve as an inlet for receiving a combustable fluid, such as wet gas. The base may further include a distal end that may be coupled to a nozzle cap. The nozzle cap may form a first outlet that is concentric with the central axis of the base. The base may also be coupled coaxially to a central body. Further, the base may also be coaxially coupled to a hollow holder that encircles at least part of the central body. The holder may be coupled to a hollow bushing that may also encircle at least part of the central body. The bushing may form a second outlet that encircles the central axis and that is disposed axially within the first outlet. The base may form a mouth disposed along the central axis in between the inlet and the central body. The mouth may be in communication with two passages for splitting the flow of wet gas through the burner. The first passage may extend from the mouth to the first outlet and between the holder and the distal end of the base. The second passage may extend from the mouth to the second outlet and between the holder and the central body.
For a more complete understanding of the disclosed methods and apparatuses, reference should be made to the embodiment illustrated in greater detail on the accompanying drawings, wherein:
It should be understood that the drawings are not necessarily to scale and that the disclosed embodiments are sometimes illustrated diagrammatically and in partial views. In certain instances, details which are not necessary for an understanding of the disclosed methods and apparatuses or which render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted. It should be understood, of course, that this disclosure is not limited to the particular embodiments illustrated herein.
Disclosed herein is a flaring apparatus in the form of a multiphase burner that provides clean and smokeless combustion of a waste gas effluent or a waste gas-liquid fuel mixture (i.e., “wet gas”) at high inlet pressures through fine atomization of the liquid component of the wet gas, intensive mixing with ambient air and self-sustaining ignition. The disclosed multiphase burner also may provide improved burning efficiency at decreased noise levels and improved mechanical durability and reliability.
In a typical well testing operation, a gas flare is used to burn the wet gas exiting a well test separator. The wet gas typically includes a fraction of liquid that remains in the gas flow and needs to be combusted. The liquid typically includes water and oil but some formations produce wet gas with a liquid fraction that includes water without oil, oil without water, or both at the same time. As disclosed herein, smoke-free and fallout-free flaring of the wet gas is possible even with a high fraction of liquid.
As shown in
In addition to supporting the central body 21 and support 25, the base 11 may also support a holder 38 by way of the strut 44. The holder 38 may be integrally connected to or coupled directly or indirectly to a bushing 41. As shown in
As shown in
The base 11 may also form a mouth 57 through which the support 25 passes. The strut 27 may be used to support the central body 21 and the support 25 in the axial position shown in
The burner 10 may operate in the following manner. The inlet wet gas flow 13 for flaring may be supplied though pipelines (not shown) to the base 11. The inlet wet gas flow 13 may be a complex and unsteady combination different phases: gas flow (mainly methane); droplets of oil and water carried by high-velocity gas flow; liquid film on the inlet 12 (not shown), which may be transformed into liquid slugs; and, as a minor component, flow of particulates (e.g., sand from the formation and other debris from metal pipelines). This multiphase wet gas inlet flow 13 passes through the narrow mouth 57. At the sharp edge of mouth 57, the inlet flow 13 may be divided into two flows 61 and 63 as shown in
The flow 61 may include gas carrying liquid droplets and liquid jets, which develop as a result of detachment of liquid film from the base 11 at or near the tapered surface 64 and/or the mouth 57. The gas, liquid droplets and liquid jets move through the central passage 58 between the central body 21 and the holder 38/bushing 41. Due to the converging inner surface 64 of the base 11 in the vicinity of the mouth 57 (see
In contrast, the flow 63 includes gas and liquid droplets and passes through the outer passage 59 as shown. The flow 63 exits the burner 10 through the nozzle cap outlet 18, which as shown in
The design of the burner 10 and its dual passage flows 61, 63 may provide an improved dispersion of big liquid droplets and liquid films. Specifically, big liquid droplets and any liquid films from the flow 61 may be dispersed into smaller droplets inside the burner 10 and between the central body 21 and holder 38/bushing 41. Further, another atomization of the flow 61 may take places downstream the sonic transition cross-section shown in phantom at 65 in
For a high-pressure gas-liquid flow (when the absolute pressure at the inlet 12 of the base 11 exceeds about 0.2 MPa), transition of a flow through the narrowing central passage 58 may result in the sonic transition critical section 65 at a narrow point of the central passage 58. The critical section 65 may be defined as a section where the gas flow at a given temperature reaches the sonic level. As an example, an expected location for critical cross-section 65 in the gas flow 61 through the central passage 58 is shown just upstream of the outlet 55 in
The smooth-shaped mouth 57 in combination with the control body 21 splits inlet gas-liquid flow 13 into two parts 61, 63 as shown in
The serrations on the outlet 18 of the nozzle cap 15 may produce turbulisation of the exit flow and may improve aeration of the final mixture at the outlets 18, 55 of the burner 10 while suppressing jet noise while the flow 63 is ejected from the outer passage 59. The small size of the serrations may also act to disperse the liquid film (if a film has survived up to outlet 18) into small droplets that continue their flight in the near the central axis 66.
The dual flows 61, 63 produced by the burner 10 may result in only a minor part of liquid (in the form of small droplets) that is dragged by the deviated gas flow 63 into the outer passage 59. Therefore, the gas flow 63 passing through outer passage 59 may have much lower liquid content than the flow 61 through the central passage 58.
The smallest cross-sectional area for the central passage 58 may be at or near the outlet 55 and may also be in close proximity to the smallest cross-sectional area for the outer passage 59, which is at the outlet 18 and which may also be small enough to generate sonic velocities for the flow 63. Any surviving liquid droplets in the flow 63 may be dispersed into a fine mist along the central axis 66 as such droplets exit the outlet 18. Specifically, at the outlet 18 of the nozzle cap 15, the flow from the outer passage 59 ejects near the serrated outlet 18. The serrations on the outlet 18 facilitate dispersion of any liquid film present in the flow 63 along the axis 66, better mixing of gas with ambient air, and a reduction in the jet noise level.
As a result of gas-liquid flow splitting into two flows 61, 63 and dispersion of liquid droplets inside the burner 10, the exit flow may consist of a core flow with a high concentration of liquid droplets (spray flow) and a turbulised sheath-shaped flow with a low concentration of entrained droplets. Mixed with ambient air and entrained by a highly turbulised jet flow, the mixture of combustible gas, liquid droplets, and air becomes a mixture that may be ignited for clean and smokeless combustion of wet gas with a high amount of entrained liquid. The mass fraction of liquid in the inlet flow can be up to 30% or more. However, the described gas burner device also operates as effective burner for fluids with low liquid content (dry gas) as well.
The smallest cross-sectional area for the central passage 58 is about equal to the smallest cross-sectional area for the outer passage 59. However, the proportions between the minimal cross-sectional areas for two passages 58 and 59 can vary by 30-50% depending on the fluid composition and inlet pressure in the base 11. The serrations on the outlet 18 may be triangular-shaped with the height in the range from about 2 to about 6 mm. However, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art, other geometries and sizes can be chosen for liquid film atomization, effective gas-air mixing, and jet noise reduction. The bushing 41 and central body 21 may have axisymmetric shapes for defining the central passage 58. Since a minor fraction of solid particulate (sand) can be found in the burner inlet flow 13 and high-speed solid particles create an abrasive impact on target surfaces (sand-jetting), the bushing 41 and central body 21 may be fabricated from a wear-resistant alloy.
In field conditions, due to high velocities of fluid flow and intensive heat radiation from the flame, the nozzle cap 15 and bushing 41 may degrade to a point of failure before other parts of burner 10. Therefore, the nozzle cap 15 and bushing 41 may be replaced in a quick process performed on-site due to the use of threaded distal surfaces 42, 43, 16, 17. Specifically, the nozzle cap 15 may be detached from the base 11 and the bushing 41 may be detached from the holder 38 without disturbing the central body 21. Durability of the burner 10 is achieved in part by using abrasion-resistant materials for the bushing 41 and nozzle cap 15 and providing the removable design for the bushing 41 and nozzle cap 15.
In general, the disclosed high-pressure multiphase burner 10 with dual passages 58, 59 may be used to improve the dispersion of liquid components of wet gas and provide improved flaring over other burners known in the art.
The wet gas inlet pressure may be greater than 1 barg. For input pressures above 1 barg, the critical section 65 at the outlet 55 and the critical section at the annular orifice defined by the outlet 18 and the outer surface 45 of the bushing 41 are formed inside the central passage 58 and outer passage 59 respectively, and this facilitates dispersion liquid components into a fine spray of gas-liquid fuel at the burner outlets 55, 18.
Although the disclosed burner 10 is described as multiphase burner, it must be appreciated that the burner 10 as described herein can be used for combustion of dry combustible gas (‘dry gas”) without any changes in design.
The gas-liquid flow 13, 14 that is directed through the two passages 58, 59 within the burner 10 may pass through corresponding critical sections (shock waves) if the input pressure exceeds about 2 barg. Fluid mechanics may describe this situation as under-expanded flow. As the exit gas-liquid flow comes out from the outlets 55, 18 to surrounding air, shock waves may be developed, which creates zones of high and low pressure. At a stable input flow rate, the shock waves remain at certain distances from the nozzle outlets 55, 18. These zones may be a place of additional atomization of liquid droplets. As the flow (gas jet with atomized fuel) keeps expanding, the axial velocity of the jet becomes close to the flame propagation speed, so self-stabilization of flare flame takes place.
The disclosed multiphase burner 10 may be used in many industries, including those where a separate liquid feed 14 is required. The liquid component (or liquid component with suspended solid particles like particles of micronized coal) may be fed through the inlet 14 into the base 11 and the gas (vapour) component of the feed may be supplied through the inlet 12 as shown in
While only certain embodiments have been set forth, alternatives and modifications will be apparent from the above description to those skilled in the art. These and other alternatives are considered equivalents and within the spirit and scope of this disclosure and the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/RU2012/000837 | 10/17/2012 | WO | 00 |