The following prior applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes:
U.S. Patent Publication 2011/0268225 of application Ser. No. 12/784,414, filed May 20, 2010, naming Harm Cronie and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Orthogonal Differential Vector Signaling” (hereinafter “Cronie I”).
U.S. Patent Publication 2011/0302478 of application Ser. No. 12/982,777, filed Dec. 30, 2010, naming Harm Cronie and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Power and Pin Efficient Chip-to-Chip Communications with Common-Mode Resilience and SSO Resilience” (hereinafter “Cronie II”).
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/542,599, filed Jul. 5, 2012, naming Armin Tajalli, Harm Cronie, and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Methods and Circuits for Efficient Processing and Detection of Balanced Codes” (hereafter called “Tajalli I”.)
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/842,740, filed Mar. 15, 2013, naming Brian Holden, Amin Shokrollahi and Anant Singh, entitled “Methods and Systems for Skew Tolerance in and Advanced Detectors for Vector Signaling Codes for Chip-to-Chip Communication”, hereinafter identified as [Holden I];
U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/946,574, filed Feb. 28, 2014, naming Amin Shokrollahi, Brian Holden, and Richard Simpson, entitled “Clock Embedded Vector Signaling Codes”, hereinafter identified as [Shokrollahi I].
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/612,241, filed Aug. 4, 2015, naming Amin Shokrollahi, Ali Hormati, and Roger Ulrich, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Low Power Chip-to-Chip Communications with Constrained ISI Ratio”, hereinafter identified as [Shokrollahi II].
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/895,206, filed May 15, 2013, naming Roger Ulrich and Peter Hunt, entitled “Circuits for Efficient Detection of Vector Signaling Codes for Chip-to-Chip Communications using Sums of Differences”, hereinafter identified as [Ulrich I].
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/816,896, filed Aug. 3, 2015, naming Brian Holden and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Orthogonal Differential Vector Signaling Codes with Embedded Clock”, hereinafter identified as [Holden II].
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/926,958, filed Oct. 29, 2015, naming Richard Simpson, Andrew Stewart, and Ali Hormati, entitled “Clock Data Alignment System for Vector Signaling Code Communications Link”, hereinafter identified as [Stewart I].
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/925,686, filed Oct. 28, 2015, naming Armin Tajalli, entitled “Advanced Phase Interpolator”, hereinafter identified as [Tajalli II].
U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/286,717, filed Jan. 25, 2016, naming Armin Tajalli, entitled “Voltage Sampler Driver with Enhanced High-Frequency Gain”, hereinafter identified as [Tajalli III].
U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/326,593, filed Apr. 22, 2016, naming Armin Tajalli, entitled “Sampler with Increased Wideband Gain and Extended Evaluation Time”, hereinafter identified as [Tajalli IV].
U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/326,591, filed Apr. 22, 2016, naming Armin Tajalli, entitled “High Performance Phase Locked Loop”, hereinafter identified as [Tajalli V].
U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/326,593, filed Apr. 22, 2016, naming Armin Tajalli and Ali Hormati, entitled “Sampler with Increased Wideband Gain and Extended Evaluation Time”, hereinafter identified as [Tajalli VI].
The present embodiments relate to communications systems circuits generally, and more particularly to calculating and applying inter-symbol interference corrective factors at a data receiver, as one component of detecting received communications signals from a high-speed multi-wire interface used for chip-to-chip communication.
In modern digital systems, digital information has to be processed in a reliable and efficient way. In this context, digital information is to be understood as information available in discrete, i.e., discontinuous values. Bits, collection of bits, but also numbers from a finite set can be used to represent digital information.
In most chip-to-chip, or device-to-device communication systems, communication takes place over a plurality of wires to increase the aggregate bandwidth. A single or pair of these wires may be referred to as a channel or link and multiple channels create a communication bus between the electronic components. At the physical circuitry level, in chip-to-chip communication systems, buses are typically made of electrical conductors in the package between chips and motherboards, on printed circuit boards (“PCBs”) boards or in cables and connectors between PCBs. In high frequency applications, microstrip or stripline PCB traces may be used.
Common methods for transmitting signals over bus wires include single-ended and differential signaling methods. In applications requiring high speed communications, those methods can be further optimized in terms of power consumption and pin-efficiency, especially in high-speed communications. More recently, vector signaling methods have been proposed such as described in [Cronie I] and [Cronie II] to further optimize the trade-offs between power consumption, pin efficiency and noise robustness of chip-to-chip communication systems. In those vector signaling systems, digital information at the transmitter is transformed into a different representation space in the form of a vector codeword that is chosen in order to optimize the power consumption, pin-efficiency and speed trade-offs based on the transmission channel properties and communication system design constraints. Herein, this process is referred to as “encoding”. The encoded codeword is communicated as a group of signals from the transmitter to one or more receivers. At a receiver, the received signals corresponding to the codeword are transformed back into the original digital information representation space. Herein, this process is referred to as “decoding”.
Regardless of the encoding method used, the received signals presented to the receiving device must be sampled (or their signal value otherwise recorded) at intervals best representing the original transmitted values, regardless of transmission channel delays, interference, and noise. The timing of this sampling or slicing operation is controlled by an associated Clock and Data Recovery (CDR) timing system, which determines the appropriate sample timing. [Stewart I] and [Tajalli V] provide examples of such CDR systems.
Methods and systems are described for receiving an input data voltage signal at a first data decision circuit of set of pipelined data decision circuits, receiving an aggregate decision feedback equalization (DFE) correction current signal from a first analog current summation bus, the aggregate DFE correction current signal comprising at least one DFE tap-weighted current from at least one respective other data decision circuit of the set of pipelined data decision circuits, determining a data output decision value based on the received input data voltage signal and the received aggregate DFE correction current signal, and generating at least one outbound DFE tap-weighted current on at least one other analog current summation bus connected to at least one other data decision circuit of the set of pipelined data decision circuits.
Methods and systems are described for obtaining a sampled data bit, generating at least two DFE tap-weighted currents based on the sampled data bit and a set of at least two computed DFE factors, and responsively providing the at least two DFE tap-weighted currents to corresponding analog summation busses of a set N−1 analog summation busses connected to N−1 other data decision circuits, wherein N is an integer greater than 1, receiving, via a Nth analog summation bus, an aggregate DFE correction current signal representing a summation of at least two DFE tap-weighted currents generated by a corresponding at least two of the N−1 other data decision circuits, and forming a corrected input signal by applying the aggregate DFE correction current signal to an input signal received via a multi-wire bus.
Communications receivers must continue to operate reliably on received signals that may have undergone significant attenuation due to transmission line losses, as well as distortions caused by frequency-dependent attenuation and inter-symbol interference (ISI). Receive signal amplifiers and equalizers, such as the well-known Continuous Time Linear Equalizer (CTLE) can mitigate some of these degradations. [Tajalli III] provides examples of such embodiments, in which the high frequency gain of the sampling circuit may be advantageously boosted over a narrow frequency range, in a so-called high frequency peaking action. [Tajalli IV] describes other embodiments providing broadband gain.
Receive signal distortion caused by inter-symbol interference may be mitigated by use of Decision Feedback Equalization (DFE), where correction factors derived from previously-received symbols are used to correct distortions in the currently received symbol. However, at very high data rates generation of such DFE correction factors may be problematic, as previous symbol values may not have been fully determined in time to aid resolution of the next symbol value. Embodiments are described that efficiently generate DFE correction factors, and allow them to be applied to pipelined or parallel processed receiver instances.
To reliably detect the data values transmitted over a communications system, a communications receiver must accurately measure its received signal value amplitudes at carefully selected times, typically at or near the center of that received signal's period of stability between transitions (i.e. once per receive unit interval, or UI.) This point is commonly described as the “center of eye”, (referring to the “eye diagram” of signal amplitude vs. clock intervals) and is typically determined by use of a local “receive clock” which is configured to occur at that desirable sampling time. Generation and ongoing control of such receive clock timing is well understood in the art, as Clock Data Alignment (CDA, also known as Clock Data Recovery or CDR) systems measure and incrementally adjust sample timing versus receive signal stability time to optimize sample timing.
In some embodiments, the value of the received signal is first captured at the selected time using a sample-and-hold or track-and-hold circuit, and then the resulting value is measured against one or more reference values using a known voltage comparator circuit.
The source of the input signal to the embodiments described herein may be derived from a single wire signal, or may be derived from a weighted linear combination of multiple wire signals, such as provided by a Multi Input Comparator or mixer (MIC) used to detect vector signaling codes and described in [Tajalli I], [Holden I] and [Ulrich I.]
Multiphase Receive Processing
As communications system signaling rates have increased, it has become progressively more difficult to perform all elements of receive data processing during a single receive unit interval. Some embodiments have resorted to pipelining; utilizing clocked latches to separate sequential processing steps and allow them to be performed essentially in series over multiple unit intervals. However, as every element of the pipeline must operate at the same high clock speed as the input, pipelining alone cannot compensate for insufficient logic speed or mitigate excessive power consumption in the receiver system.
Other embodiments distribute received signals over multiple receive processing phases, each such phase performing the reception operations essentially in parallel with other phases, the resulting received data from the multiple phases then being consolidated for subsequent use or storage. In such an architecture, each processing phase may have more time to perform the computations, and optionally may be configured to operate at a lower clock rate than the original received signal source, thus relaxing logic speed concerns and/or permitting reduced power consumption.
As one illustrative example, a digital data stream transmitted at 32 Gbits/second may be processed by a fully serial receiver operating at a clock rate of 32 GHz and thus having a single 33 psec unit interval in which it must perform the detection operations for a single received bit. In an alternative multiphase receiver embodiment, signals from consecutive received unit intervals are distributed across, as an example, eight essentially identical processing phases, each such phase then having as much as 264 psec to perform the detection operations for a single received bit. In a further embodiment requiring only small amounts of processing within each phase (e.g. slicing of the resulting signal to obtain a digital bit value, and latching of that digital bit value to produce a data output), the processing phases may be operated at a reduced clock rate (e.g. 4 GHz versus 32 GHz,) substantially reducing power consumption.
Decision Feedback Equalization
Decision Feedback Equalization or DFE is a technique used to improve signal detection capabilities in serial communication systems. It presumes that the transmission line characteristics of the communications channel between transmitter and receiver are imperfect, thus energy associated with previously transmitted bits may remain in the channel (for example, as reflections from impedance perturbations) to negatively impact reception of subsequent bits. A receiver's DFE system processes each bit detected in a past unit interval (UI) through a simulation of the communications channel to produce an estimate of that bit's influence on a subsequent unit interval. That estimate, herein called the “DFE correction”, may be subtracted from the received signal to compensate for the predicted inter-symbol interference. Alternative embodiments may perform the functionally equivalent operation of such subtraction, by measuring the received signal (e.g. using a differential comparator) at a reference voltage level derived from the DFE correction signal. Practical DFE systems apply DFE corrections derived from multiple previous unit intervals (herein individually described as “DFE factors”) to the received signal before detecting a data bit.
At very high data rates, there may not be sufficient time to detect a received bit, calculate its associated DFE factors, and apply the resulting DFE correction to the next received unit interval in time to detect the next bit. Thus, some embodiments utilize so-called “unrolled DFE”, where correction values are speculatively determined for some or all possible combinations of previous data values, those speculative corrections are applied to multiple copies of the received signal, and speculative detections made of the resulting corrected signal instances. When the earlier data values are finally resolved, the correct speculatively detected output may be chosen as the received data value for that unit interval.
“Unrolling” of DFE for even a modest number of historical unit intervals in this way uses a significant number of speculative results to be maintained effectively in parallel, introducing significant circuit complexity and associated power consumption.
Other embodiments as described in [Tajalli VI] utilize analog memory elements such as a sample-and-hold circuit, to retain a copy of the received signal in analog form until a DFE correction is available.
Complexity of Known Art Multiphase DFE
The functional steps performed by a known art DFE system typically comprise maintenance of a history of data values received in previous receive unit intervals, computation of an influence factor each such historical data value would have on a forthcoming receive unit interval, combination of these influence factors into a composite DFE correction, application of the DFE correction to the received signal, and ultimate detection of a data value from that corrected received signal.
One example of a known art receiver incorporating multiple processing phases is shown in
A conventional DFE architecture based on the previously described known art functional steps typically incorporates point-to-point digital busses that interconnect the processing phases shown in
Each DFE factor generator 230, 231, 232, 233 multiplies the detected data value by the predetermined scaling factor appropriate to that component of the DFE correction. As known in the art, said predetermined scaling factors may be pre-calculated, configured, determined heuristically, or computed based on measurements of the received signal characteristics; for illustrative purposes they are shown in
Similarly, the DFE Compensation applied to the current unit interval is composed of components corresponding to the previous three unit intervals. Each data bus terminates in a digital to analog converter circuit 240, 241, 242, 243 that receives each of the digital words and produces an analog result. The various analog values representing the DFE factors are then summed 250 to produce the final DFE correction to the sampled input signal from which the data result will be detected. (Alternatively, in other embodiments the components may be summed in the digital domain, and the result converted to analog.) Regardless, each processing phase 200 must provide three DFE factor generators to send partial DFE compensation values representing (now+1), (now+2), and (now+3) compensation terms to the other three phases, as well as an adder and at least one DAC to generate its own DFE compensation value from the DFE factors provided to it by other phases.
An alternative embodiment of a receiver utilizing Decision Feedback Compensation and configured to operate as multiple essentially parallel processing phases is illustrated in
In at least one embodiment, a distributed analog current summation occurs as two or more data decision circuits each inject respective DFE tap-weighted currents representing the computed DFE correction components into an analog current summation bus. The data decision circuit acting as the analog current summation bus receiver receives an aggregate analog DFE correction current signal via current buffer 340, the aggregate DFE correction current signal representing a linear sum of the DFE tap-weighted currents (i.e. a sum of multiple terms contributed by different data decision circuits) which may be applied 310 directly to the received input data signal. In
In a further embodiment, a two-wire differential bus is used for each analog current summation bus, with each DFE tap-weighted current represented as the difference of currents injected into the two wires. In at least one such embodiment, the magnitude of the DFE tap-weighted currents injected into the bus by a single node represents the computed DFE correction factor, with the order in which those currents are injected (e.g. a first current to the first wire of the bus and a second current to the second wire of the bus, or the second current to the first wire and the first current to the second wire) determined by a historical data decision detected by that data decision circuit. In a further embodiment, the first and second currents are selected from predetermined values based on a digital value of the historical data output decision value. In a further embodiment, transistors acting as analog switches steer currents as directed by the historical data output decision value. In some embodiments, the magnitude of each DFE tap-weighted current is dependent on the difference in unit intervals between the other data decision circuits. For example, referring to the example of
A further embodiment is shown in
Compared to the more than 96 digital interconnection wires needed in the previous example of
As shown in
Data decision circuit 510 of the set of pipelined data decision circuits applies the aggregate DFE correction current signal produced by the summing action of DFE tap-weighted currents on analog current summation bus 590 to the received input data signal. As shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, as shown in
In some embodiments, the method further includes generating the plurality of DFE tap-weighted currents using a plurality of differential pairs of transistors connected in parallel to the first analog summation bus. In such embodiments, each DFE tap-weighted current has a corresponding magnitude h determined by a corresponding DFE correction factor current source connected to a respective differential pair of transistors. In some embodiments, each DFE tap-weighted current has a sign determined by a historical decision generated by an associated data decision circuit. In some embodiments, the plurality of DFE tap-weighted currents are drawn through a current buffer connected to the plurality of differential pairs of transistors.
In some embodiments, the aggregate DFE correction current signal further includes at least one DFE tap-weighted current provided by a data decision history element. In some embodiments, determining the data output decision value includes combining the received input data voltage with the aggregate DFE correction current signal. In some such embodiments, combining the received input data voltage with the aggregate DFE correction current signal includes generating a data current signal representative of the received input data voltage and performing an analog current summation of the aggregate DFE correction current signal and the data current signal. The data current signal may be generated by applying the input data voltage to a differential pair of transistors to draw the data current through a pair of resistors connected to the first analog current summation bus. In some embodiments, each data decision circuit of the set of pipelined data decision circuits operates on a respective phase of a plurality of phases of a sampling clock.
In some embodiments, a method includes obtaining a data output decision value, generating at least two DFE tap-weighted currents based on the sampled data bit and a set of at least two computed DFE factors. The at least two DFE tap-weighted currents are responsively provided to corresponding analog summation busses of a set N−1 analog summation busses connected to N−1 other data decision circuits, wherein N is an integer greater than 1. An aggregate DFE correction current signal is received via an Nth analog summation bus, the aggregate DFE correction current signal representing a summation of at least two DFE tap-weighted current generated by a corresponding at least two of the N−1 other processing phases. A corrected input signal is formed by applying the aggregate DFE correction current signal to an input signal received via a multi-wire bus.
In some embodiments, the method further includes slicing the corrected input signal, and responsively generating a data output decision value by latching the sliced corrected input signal. In some embodiments, the slicing is performed by an integrator. In alternative embodiments, the slicing is performed by a digital comparator.
In some embodiments, the corrected input signal is a voltage signal formed by subtracting the aggregate DFE correction current signal from the received input signal. In some embodiments, the voltage signal is formed by sinking the DFE tap-weighted currents through an active load connected to the received input signal. In some embodiments, the current sunk through the active load includes current associated with computed DFE factors of the at least two of the N−1 other data decision circuits. In some embodiments, the active load is a differential pair of transistors, and wherein generating the corrected input signal comprises controlling a voltage drop across the pair of transistors, each respective transistor having an associated voltage drop determined by a respective current sunk through the respective transistor.
In some embodiments, the at least two DFE tap-weighted currents comprise N−1 DFE tap-weighted currents, and wherein the DFE correction value represents a summation of N−1 DFE tap-weighted currents generated by the N−1 other processing phases. In some embodiments, each summation bus comprises a differential pair of wires.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/411,937, entitled “Multiphase Data Receiver with Distributed DFE,” filed Oct. 24, 2016, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
668687 | Mayer | Feb 1901 | A |
780883 | Hinchman | Jan 1905 | A |
3196351 | Slepian | Jul 1965 | A |
3636463 | Ongkiehong | Jan 1972 | A |
3939468 | Mastin | Feb 1976 | A |
4163258 | Ebihara | Jul 1979 | A |
4181967 | Nash | Jan 1980 | A |
4206316 | Burnsweig | Jun 1980 | A |
4276543 | Miller | Jun 1981 | A |
4486739 | Franaszek | Dec 1984 | A |
4499550 | Ray, III | Feb 1985 | A |
4722084 | Morton | Jan 1988 | A |
4772845 | Scott | Sep 1988 | A |
4774498 | Traa | Sep 1988 | A |
4864303 | Ofek | Sep 1989 | A |
4897657 | Brubaker | Jan 1990 | A |
4974211 | Corl | Nov 1990 | A |
5017924 | Guiberteau | May 1991 | A |
5053974 | Penz | Oct 1991 | A |
5166956 | Baltus | Nov 1992 | A |
5168509 | Nakamura | Dec 1992 | A |
5266907 | Dacus | Nov 1993 | A |
5283761 | Gillingham | Feb 1994 | A |
5287305 | Yoshida | Feb 1994 | A |
5311516 | Kuznicki | May 1994 | A |
5331320 | Cideciyan | Jul 1994 | A |
5412689 | Chan | May 1995 | A |
5449895 | Hecht | Sep 1995 | A |
5459465 | Kagey | Oct 1995 | A |
5461379 | Weinman | Oct 1995 | A |
5510736 | Van De Plassche | Apr 1996 | A |
5511119 | Lechleider | Apr 1996 | A |
5553097 | Dagher | Sep 1996 | A |
5566193 | Cloonan | Oct 1996 | A |
5599550 | Kohlruss | Feb 1997 | A |
5626651 | Dullien | May 1997 | A |
5629651 | Mizuno | May 1997 | A |
5659353 | Kostreski | Aug 1997 | A |
5727006 | Dreyer | Mar 1998 | A |
5748948 | Yu | May 1998 | A |
5802356 | Gaskins | Sep 1998 | A |
5825808 | Hershey | Oct 1998 | A |
5856935 | Moy | Jan 1999 | A |
5875202 | Venters | Feb 1999 | A |
5945935 | Kusumoto | Aug 1999 | A |
5949060 | Schattschneider | Sep 1999 | A |
5982954 | Delen | Nov 1999 | A |
5995016 | Perino | Nov 1999 | A |
6005895 | Perino | Dec 1999 | A |
6084883 | Norrell | Jul 2000 | A |
6119263 | Mowbray | Sep 2000 | A |
6172634 | Leonowich | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175230 | Hamblin | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6232908 | Nakaigawa | May 2001 | B1 |
6278740 | Nordyke | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6316987 | Dally | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6346907 | Dacy | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6359931 | Perino | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6378073 | Davis | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384758 | Michalski | May 2002 | B1 |
6398359 | Silverbrook | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404820 | Postol | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417737 | Moloudi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433800 | Holtz | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452420 | Wong | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473877 | Sharma | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483828 | Balachandran | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6504875 | Perino | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6509773 | Buchwald | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6522699 | Anderson | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6556628 | Poulton | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563382 | Yang | May 2003 | B1 |
6621427 | Greenstreet | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624699 | Yin | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6650638 | Walker | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6661355 | Cornelius | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664355 | Kim | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6686879 | Shattil | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690739 | Mui | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6766342 | Kechriotis | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6772351 | Werner | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6839429 | Gaikwad | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6839587 | Yonce | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6854030 | Perino | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865234 | Agazzi | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6865236 | Terry | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876317 | Sankaran | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6898724 | Chang | May 2005 | B2 |
6927709 | Kiehl | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6954492 | Williams | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6963622 | Eroz | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972701 | Jansson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6973613 | Cypher | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6976194 | Cypher | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6982954 | Dhong | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990138 | Bejjani | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993311 | Li | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999516 | Rajan | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7023817 | Kuffner | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039136 | Olson | May 2006 | B2 |
7053802 | Cornelius | May 2006 | B2 |
7075996 | Simon | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080288 | Ferraiolo | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082557 | Schauer | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085153 | Ferrant | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7085336 | Lee | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7127003 | Rajan | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130944 | Perino | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142612 | Horowitz | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142865 | Tsai | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7164631 | Tateishi | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167019 | Broyde | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7176823 | Zabroda | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180949 | Kleveland | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184483 | Rajan | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7199728 | Dally | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7231558 | Gentieu | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7269130 | Pitio | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7269212 | Chau | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7335976 | Chen | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336112 | Sha | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7339990 | Hidaka | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346819 | Bansal | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7348989 | Stevens | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349484 | Stojanovic | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7356213 | Cunningham | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7358869 | Chiarulli | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7362130 | Broyde | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362697 | Becker | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366942 | Lee | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370264 | Worley | May 2008 | B2 |
7372390 | Yamada | May 2008 | B2 |
7389333 | Moore | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7397302 | Bardsley | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7400276 | Sotiriadis | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7428273 | Foster | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7456778 | Werner | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462956 | Lan | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7496162 | Srebranig | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7570704 | Nagarajan | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7535957 | Ozawa | May 2009 | B2 |
7539532 | Tran | May 2009 | B2 |
7599390 | Pamarti | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613234 | Raghavan | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7616075 | Kushiyama | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620116 | Bessios | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7633850 | Nagarajan | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639596 | Cioffi | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7643588 | Visalli | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650525 | Chang | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7656321 | Wang | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7694204 | Schmidt | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7697915 | Behzad | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698088 | Sul | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7706456 | Laroia | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7706524 | Zerbe | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7746764 | Rawlins | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7768312 | Hirose | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787572 | Scharf | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7804361 | Lim | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7808456 | Chen | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7808883 | Green | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7841909 | Murray | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7869497 | Benvenuto | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7869546 | Tsai | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873115 | Zerbe | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882413 | Chen | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899653 | Hollis | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7907676 | Stojanovic | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7933770 | Kruger | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8000664 | Khorram | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8030999 | Chatterjee | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8036300 | Evans | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8050332 | Chung | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8055095 | Palotai | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8064535 | Wiley | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8085172 | Li | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8091006 | Prasad | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106806 | Toyomura | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8149906 | Saito | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8159375 | Abbasfar | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8159376 | Abbasfar | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8180931 | Lee | May 2012 | B2 |
8185807 | Oh | May 2012 | B2 |
8199849 | Oh | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8199863 | Chen | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8218670 | AbouRjeily | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8233544 | Bao | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8245094 | Jiang | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8253454 | Lin | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8279094 | Abbasfar | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8279745 | Dent | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289914 | Li | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8295250 | Gorokhov | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8295336 | Lutz | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305247 | Pun | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8310389 | Chui | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8341492 | Shen | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8359445 | Ware | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8365035 | Hara | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8406315 | Tsai | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8406316 | Sugita | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8429492 | Yoon | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8429495 | Przybylski | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8437440 | Zhang | May 2013 | B1 |
8442099 | Sederat | May 2013 | B1 |
8442210 | Zerbe | May 2013 | B2 |
8443223 | Abbasfar | May 2013 | B2 |
8451913 | Oh | May 2013 | B2 |
8462891 | Kizer | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8472513 | Malipatil | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8620166 | Dong | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8498344 | Wilson | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8498368 | Husted | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8520348 | Dong | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8520493 | Goulahsen | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8539318 | Cronie | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8547272 | Nestler | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577284 | Seo | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8578246 | Mittelholzer | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8588254 | Diab | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8588280 | Oh | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8593305 | Tajalli | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8602643 | Gardiner | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8604879 | Mourant | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8638241 | Sudhakaran | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8643437 | Chiu | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8649445 | Cronie | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8649460 | Ware | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8674861 | Matsuno | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8687968 | Nosaka | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8711919 | Kumar | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8718184 | Cronie | May 2014 | B1 |
8755426 | Cronie | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8773964 | Hsueh | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8780687 | Clausen | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8782578 | Tell | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8791735 | Shibasaki | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8831440 | Yu | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8841936 | Nakamura | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8879660 | Peng | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8897134 | Kern | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8898504 | Baumgartner | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8938171 | Tang | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8949693 | Ordentlich | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8951072 | Hashim | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8975948 | GonzalezDiaz | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8989317 | Holden | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9015566 | Cronie | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9020049 | Schwager | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9036764 | Hossain | May 2015 | B1 |
9059816 | Simpson | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9069995 | Cronie | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9077386 | Holden | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9083576 | Hormati | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9093791 | Liang | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9100232 | Hormati | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9106465 | Walter | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9124557 | Fox | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9148087 | Tajalli | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9152495 | Losh | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9165615 | Amirkhany | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9172412 | Kim | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9178503 | Hsieh | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9183085 | Northcott | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9197470 | Okunev | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9281785 | Sjoland | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9288082 | Ulrich | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9288089 | Cronie | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9292716 | Winoto | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9300503 | Holden | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9306621 | Zhang | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9331962 | Lida | May 2016 | B2 |
9362974 | Fox | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9363114 | Shokrollahi | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9374250 | Musah | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9401828 | Cronie | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9432082 | Ulrich | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9432298 | Smith | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9444654 | Hormati | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9455744 | George | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9455765 | Schumacher | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9461862 | Holden | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9479369 | Shokrollahi | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9509437 | Shokrollahi | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9520883 | Shibasaki | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9544015 | Ulrich | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9634797 | Benammar | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9667379 | Cronie | May 2017 | B2 |
20010006538 | Simon | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010055344 | Lee | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020034191 | Shattil | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020044316 | Myers | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020057592 | Robb | May 2002 | A1 |
20020154633 | Shin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163881 | Dhong | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020167339 | Chang | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174373 | Chang | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181607 | Izumi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030016763 | Doi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016770 | Trans | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030046618 | Collins | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030085763 | Schrodinger | May 2003 | A1 |
20030146783 | Bandy | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030174023 | Miyasita | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185310 | Ketchum | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030218558 | Mulder | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040027185 | Fiedler | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040146117 | Subramaniam | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155802 | Lamy | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161019 | Raghavan | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169529 | Afghahi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050063493 | Foster | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050134380 | Nairn | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050174841 | Ho | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050195000 | Parker | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201491 | Wei | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213686 | Love | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220182 | Kuwata | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050270098 | Zhang | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060036668 | Jaussi | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060097786 | Su | May 2006 | A1 |
20060103463 | Lee | May 2006 | A1 |
20060120486 | Visalli | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060126751 | Bessios | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133538 | Stojanovic | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140324 | Casper | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060159005 | Rawlins | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060233291 | Garlepp | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070001723 | Lin | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070002954 | Cornelius | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070030796 | Green | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070076871 | Renes | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103338 | Teo | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121716 | Nagarajan | May 2007 | A1 |
20070182487 | Ozasa | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201546 | Lee | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204205 | Niu | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070263711 | Kramer | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283210 | Prasad | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080007367 | Kim | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080012598 | Mayer | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080069198 | Bhoja | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080104374 | Mohamed | May 2008 | A1 |
20080159448 | Anim-Appiah | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187037 | Bulzacchelli | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080192621 | Suehiro | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080317188 | Staszewski | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090059782 | Cole | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090115523 | Akizuki | May 2009 | A1 |
20090154604 | Lee | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090195281 | Tamura | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090262876 | Arima | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090316730 | Feng | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323864 | Tired | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100020862 | Peng | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100046644 | Mazet | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100081451 | Mueck | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100148819 | Bae | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100180143 | Ware | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100215087 | Tsai | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100215112 | Tsai | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235673 | Abbasfar | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100271107 | Tran | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100283894 | Horan | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100296556 | Rave | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100309964 | Oh | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110014865 | Seo | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028089 | Komori | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032977 | Hsiao | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110051854 | Kizer | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072330 | Kolze | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110074488 | Broyde | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110084737 | Oh | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103508 | Mu | May 2011 | A1 |
20110127990 | Wilson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110228864 | Aryanfar | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110235501 | Goulahsen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110268225 | Cronie | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286497 | Nervig | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299555 | Cronie | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110302478 | Cronie | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110317559 | Kern | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120082203 | Zerbe | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120133438 | Tsuchi | May 2012 | A1 |
20120152901 | Nagorny | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120161945 | Single | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120213299 | Cronie | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120257683 | Schwager | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120327993 | Palmer | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130010892 | Cronie | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013870 | Cronie | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130106513 | Cyrusian | May 2013 | A1 |
20130114519 | Gaal | May 2013 | A1 |
20130114663 | Ding | May 2013 | A1 |
20130129019 | Sorrells | May 2013 | A1 |
20130147553 | Iwamoto | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130188656 | Ferraiolo | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130195155 | Pan | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130202065 | Chmelar | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215954 | Beukema | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130259113 | Kumar | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130271194 | Pellerano | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130307614 | Dai | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130314142 | Tamura | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130315501 | Atanassov | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130322512 | Francese | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346830 | Ordentlich | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140159769 | Hong | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177645 | Cronie | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177696 | Hwang | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140266440 | Itagaki | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269130 | Maeng | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286381 | Shibasaki | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150049798 | Hossein | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150070201 | Dedic | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150078479 | Whitby-Strevens | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150117579 | Shibasaki | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150146771 | Walter | May 2015 | A1 |
20150180642 | Hsieh | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150222458 | Hormati | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150249559 | Shokrollahi | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150319015 | Malhotra | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150333940 | Shokrollahi | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150349835 | Fox | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150380087 | Mittelholzer | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150381232 | Ulrich | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160020796 | Hormati | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160020824 | Ulrich | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036616 | Holden | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160197747 | Ulrich | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160261435 | Musah | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170019276 | Francese | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170310456 | Tajalli | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170317449 | Shokrollahi | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170317855 | Shokrollahi | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170373889 | Sakai | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1671092 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1864346 | Nov 2006 | CN |
101478286 | Jul 2009 | CN |
1926267 | May 2008 | EP |
2039221 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2003163612 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2005002162 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2009084121 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2010031824 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2011119359 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Introduction to: Analog Computers and the DSPACE System,” Course Material ECE 5230 Spring 2008, Utah State University, www.coursehero.com, 12 pages. |
Abbasfar, A., “Generalized Differential Vector Signaling”, IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC '09, (Jun. 14, 2009), pp. 1-5. |
Brown, L., et al., “V.92: The Last Dial-Up Modem?”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ., USA, vol. 52, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2004, pp. 54-61. XP011106836, ISSN: 0090-6779, DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2003.822168, pp. 55-59. |
Burr, “Spherical Codes for M-ARY Code Shift Keying”, University of York, Apr. 2, 1989, pp. 67-72, United Kingdom. |
Cheng, W., “Memory Bus Encoding for Low Power: A Tutorial”, Quality Electronic Design, IEEE, International Symposium on Mar. 26-28, 2001, pp. 199-204, Piscataway, NJ. |
Clayton, P., “Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility”, Wiley-Interscience, 2006. |
Counts, L., et al., “One-Chip Slide Rule Works with Logs, Antilogs for Real-Time Processing,” Analog Devices Computational Products 6, Reprinted from Electronic Design, May 2, 1985, 7 pages. |
Dasilva et al., “Multicarrier Orthogonal CDMA Signals for Quasi-Synchronous Communication Systems”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 12, No. 5 (Jun. 1, 1994), pp. 842-852. |
Design Brief 208 Using the Anadigm Multiplier CAM, Copyright 2002 Anadigm, 6 pages. |
Ericson, T., et al., “Spherical Codes Generated by Binary Partitions of Symmetric Pointsets”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 41, No. 1, Jan. 1995, pp. 107-129. |
Farzan, K., et al., “Coding Schemes for Chip-to-Chip Interconnect Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 14, No. 4, Apr. 2006, pp. 393-406. |
Grahame, J., “Vintage Analog Computer Kits,” posted on Aug. 25, 2006 in Classic Computing, 2 pages, http.//www.retrothing.com/2006/08/classic_analog_.html. |
Healey, A., et al., “A Comparison of 25 Gbps NRZ & PAM-4 Modulation used in Legacy & Premium Backplane Channels”, DesignCon 2012, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2011/059279 dated Sep. 22, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2011/074219 dated Jul. 4, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2012/052767 dated May 11, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US14/052986 dated Nov. 24, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2014/034220 dated Aug. 21, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jul. 14, 2011 in International Patent Application S.N. PCT/EP2011/002170, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Nov. 5, 2012, in International Patent Application S.N. PCT/EP2012/052767, 7 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/053563, dated Nov. 11, 2014, 2 pages. |
Jiang, A., et al., “Rank Modulation for Flash Memories”, IEEE Transactions of Information Theory, Jun. 2006, vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 2659-2673. |
Loh, M., et al., “A 3×9 Gb/s Shared, All-Digital CDR for High-Speed, High-Density I/O”, Matthew Loh, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vo. 47, No. 3, Mar. 2012. |
Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, for PCT/US2015/018363, dated Jun. 18, 2015, 13 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for PCT/EP2013/002681, dated Feb. 25, 2014, 15 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, dated Mar. 3, 2015, for PCT/US2014/066893, 9 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2014/015840, dated May 20, 2014. 11 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2014/043965, dated Oct. 22, 2014, 10 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2015/037466, dated Nov. 19, 2015. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2015/039952, dated Sep. 23, 2015, 8 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2015/041161, dated Oct. 7, 2015, 8 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2015/043463, dated Oct. 16, 2015, 8 pages. |
Oh, et al., Pseudo-Differential Vector Signaling for Noise Reduction in Single-Ended Signaling, DesignCon 2009. |
Poulton, et al., “Multiwire Differential Signaling”, UNC-CH Department of Computer Science Version 1.1, Aug. 6, 2003. |
Schneider, J., et al., “ELEC301 Project: Building an Analog Computer,” Dec. 19, 1999, 8 pages, http://www.clear.rice.edu/elec301/Projects99/anlgcomp/. |
She et al., “A Framework of Cross-Layer Superposition Coded Multicast for Robust IPTV Services over WiMAX,” IEEE Communications Society subject matter experts for publication in the WCNC 2008 proceedings, Mar. 31, 2008-Apr. 3, 2008, pp. 3139-3144. |
Skliar et al., A Method for the Analysis of Signals: the Square-Wave Method, Mar. 2008, Revista de Matematica: Teoria y Aplicationes, pp. 109-129. |
Slepian, D., “Premutation Modulation”, IEEE, vol. 52, No. 3, Mar. 1965, pp. 228-236. |
Stan, M., et al., “Bus-Invert Coding for Low-Power I/O, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems”, vol. 3, No. 1, Mar. 1995, pp. 49-58. |
Tallini, L., et al., “Transmission Time Analysis for the Parallel Asynchronous Communication Scheme”, IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 52, No. 5, May 2003, pp. 558-571. |
Tierney, J., et al., “A digital frequency synthesizer,” Audio and Electroacoustics, IEEE Transactions, Mar. 1971, pp. 48-57, vol. 19, Issue 1, 1 page Abstract from http://ieeexplore. |
Wang et al., “Applying CDMA Technique to Network-on-Chip”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 15, No. 10 (Oct. 1, 2007), pp. 1091-1100. |
Zouhair Ben-Neticha et al, “The streTched-Golay and other codes for high-SNR fnite-delay quantization of the Gaussian source at 1/2 Bit per sample”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 38, No. 12 Dec. 1, 1990, pp. 2089-2093, XP000203339, ISSN: 0090-6678, DOI: 10.1109/26.64647. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, dated Feb. 15, 2017, 10 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration., for PCT/US17/14997, dated Apr. 7, 2017. |
Holden, B., “Simulation results for NRZ, ENRZ & PAM-4 on 16-wire full-sized 400GE backplanes”, IEEE 802.3 400GE Study Group, Sep. 2, 2013, 19 pages, www.ieee802.0rg/3/400GSG/publiv/13_09/holden_400_01_0913.pdf. |
Holden, B., “An exploration of the technical feasibility of the major technology options for 400GE backplanes”, IEEE 802.3 400GE Study Group, Jul. 16, 2013, 18 pages, http://ieee802.org/3/400GSG/public/13_07/holden_400_01_0713.pdf. |
Holden, B., “Using Ensemble NRZ Coding for 400GE Electrical Interfaces”, IEEE 802.3 400GE Study Group, May 17, 2013, 24 pages, http://www.ieee802.org/3/400GSG/public/13_05/holden_400_01_0513.pdf. |
Farzan, et al., “Coding Schemes for Chip-to-Chip Interconnect Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 14, pp. 393-406, Apr. 2006. |
Anonymous, “Constant-weight code”, Wikipedia.org, retrieved on Jun. 2, 2017. |
Reza Navid et al, “A 40 Gb/s Serial Link Transceiver in 28 nm CMOS Technology”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 50, No. 4. Apr. 2015, pp. 814-827. |
Linten, D. et al, “T-Diodes—A Novel Plus-and-Play Wideband RF Circuit ESD Protection Methodology” EOS/ESD Symposium 07, pp. 242-249. |
Hyosup Won et al, “A 28-Gb/s Receiver With Self-contained Adaptive Equalization and Sampling Point Control Using Stochastic Sigma-Tracking Eye-Opening Monitor”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—I: Regular Papers, vol. 64, No. 3, Mar. 2017. pp. 664-674. |
Giovaneli, et al., “Space-frequency coded OFDM system for multi-wire power line communications”, Power Line Communications and Its Applications, 20015 International Symposium on Vancouver, BC, Canada, Apr. 6-8, 2005, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 191-195. |
Shibasaki, et al., “A 56-Gb/s Receiver Front-End with a CTLE and 1-Tap DFE in 20-nm CMOS”, IEEE 2014 Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, 2 pgs. |
Hidaka, et al., “A 4-Channel 1.25-10.3 Gb/s Backplane Transceiver Macro With35 dB Equalizer and Sign-Based Zero-Forcing Adaptive Control”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 44 No. 12, Dec. 2009, pp. 3547-3559. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180113835 A1 | Apr 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62411937 | Oct 2016 | US |