This disclosure relates to the field of multiphase pumps, in some embodiments pumps with low recirculated volume. This device is similar to a standard “wave rotor” pump/compressor, but with some key changes to the inlet/outlet porting to allow for multiphase and to increase the compression ratio.
Disclosed herein is a rotary pump comprising several interoperating components including: a first rotor comprising a back side, and a front side comprising at least one lobe working in conjunction with a second rotor in comprising a back side, and a front side comprising at least two buckets. In one form, the front side of the first rotor is in contact with the front side of the second rotor and operatively configure to rotate relative thereto. A housing encompassing the first and second rotors is disclosed as well as a shaft operatively configured to rotate relative to the housing. The pump utilizes a first port extending from the front side of the second rotor at each bucket to the back side of the second rotor; and in one form, at least two primary channels provided adjacent the back side of the second rotor and in fluid communication with the first port at specific regions as the second rotor rotates relative to the housing. The pump also utilizes an inlet port provided in the housing, in fluid communication with one of the primary channels; and an outlet port provided in the housing, in fluid communication with one of the primary channels other than the primary channel in fluid communication with the inlet port.
The rotary pump described above may also incorporate a secondary port extending from the front side of the second rotor at each bucket toward the back side of the second rotor. Where the secondary port is angularly and radially offset from the first port in communication with the associated bucket. A secondary channel may be provided adjacent the back side of the second rotor and in fluid communication with the secondary port at specific regions as the second rotor rotates relative to the housing. In one form, the secondary channel is in fluid communication with the outlet port.
The rotary pump may also be configured wherein at least one of the rotors comprises at least one surface defining a void formed in the outer circumference operatively configured to balance the rotor and wherein the surface defining the void is not in fluid communication with the lobes at any point in the rotation of the rotary pump.
The rotary pump as described above rotates in that the first rotor rotates in a first direction at a first rotational speed, and the second rotor rotates in the first direction at a second rotational speed which is different than the first rotational speed. The rotors may rotate such that the difference between the speed of first rotor relative to the second rotor is n1/n2 where n1 is the number of lobes on the first rotor and is the number of lobes on the second rotor.
This disclosure relates to a new multiphase pump 20 with low recirculated volume. This device is similar to a standard “wave rotor” pump/compressor, but with some key changes to the inlet/outlet porting to allow for multiphase and to increase the compression ratio.
The key to the disclosed improvements in one form is to port the inlet 22 and outlet 24 out of the back of one of the rotors as shown. The model shown is a relatively simple design as there is only one lobe on the first rotor 32, and two lobes on the second rotor 34. The double lobe second rotor 34 as shown has the ports 22/24 drilled thru the back, in the lowest point on the buckets between the lobes. If there were more lobes on the two rotors, then the ports would normally be provided in the rotor with the higher number of lobes, preferably in the lowest point on each bucket. The single lobe rotor 32 shown has voids 40 formed in the outer circumference in order to balance the rotor—however, any rotor with more than one lobe may be naturally balanced and these holes may be unnecessary. The first rotor 32 rotates in a first direction 33, while the second rotor 34 rotates in a second direction 35, but at a different speed than the first rotor 32. In one form, there is a difference in speed of each rotor of n1/n2 where n1 is the number of lobes on the first rotor 32 and n2 is the number of lobes on the second rotor 34. In one embodiment, one rotor will have exactly one more lobe than the other rotor, for example, 1 lobe to 2 lobes, or 6 lobes to 7 lobes.
The ports 22/24 in the back of the rotor 34 align radially outward from the center of rotation of the pump 20 with a pair of channels 36 and 38 cut into the housing 30. Each primary channel 36/38 is cut at the same radial distance from the center of rotation of the rotor as the rotor ports 22/24, and spans substantially 180 degrees minus the width of a rotor port as shown at locations 78 and 80. One of these channels is coupled to the inlet 26, and the other to the outlet 28 in the course of a rotation. The outer spherical surface of the two rotors in one form is preferably completely sealed, with no openings, unlike previous designs which had the inlet and outlet openings in this area. In this way, each chamber between the respective lobes of each rotor is either open to the inlet 26 or the outlet 28 at all times, except for a moment during rotation where the ports 22 and 24 align with the areas 78 and 80. As a result, it does not matter whether the contents of each cavity (bucket) are compressible or incompressible fluids—both types of fluid will simply be completely forced out of each cavity and into the outlet primary channel 38.
Also shown on this model is a small relief channel 42 linked to the outlet primary channel 38. This relief channel 42 connects to a relief port 44 in the back of the rotor 34 that aligns with the small “recirculated volume” that forms with each compression stroke. This port 44 simply allows this recirculated volume region to collapse fully without “locking” the mechanism—that is to say, if said region was filled with a fluid, and did not have the relief channel 42 present during the compression stroke, the mechanism would be difficult to turn due to the resistance of the fluid to compression. This relief channel 42 is shown here, because this rotor surface design in one form has inherent recirculated volume.
In order to maximize efficiency, small check valves can be inserted in the voids 22/24/44/56 in the back of the rotor. These check valves will prevent backflow of fluid each time the void moves from the inlet channel to the outlet channel.
This design also opens up new avenues for sealing—an apex and side seal design similar to Wankel rotary engines can be used, with the apex seal along the high point of the lobe in the single lobe rotor, and side seals all around the circumference where the lobe surfaces meet the spherical outer diameter. These types of seals were possible before, but the very small number of lobes required for this new design makes them much more practical. These types of seals should greatly increase compression efficiency. It is possible to place positive contact seals around the ports 38 and 36 which could be similar in nature to the Wankel side seals, or could take some other form
As can be seen in
Looking to the second stage shown in
Looking to
While the present invention is illustrated by description of several embodiments and while the illustrative embodiments are described in detail, it is not the intention of the applicants to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications within the scope of the appended claims will readily appear to those sufficed in the art. The invention in its broader aspects is therefore not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and methods, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of applicants' general concept.
This application claims priority benefit of U.S. Ser. No. 61/235,640, filed Aug. 20, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
32372 | Jones | May 1861 | A |
351129 | Salomo | Oct 1886 | A |
914155 | Mills et al. | Mar 1909 | A |
991576 | White | May 1911 | A |
1379653 | Shoemaker | May 1921 | A |
2101051 | Cuny | Dec 1937 | A |
2101428 | Cuny | Dec 1937 | A |
2242058 | Cuny | May 1941 | A |
2431817 | Mann | Dec 1947 | A |
3101700 | Bowdish | Aug 1963 | A |
3106912 | Kahlert | Oct 1963 | A |
3156222 | Miller, Jr. | Nov 1964 | A |
3236186 | Wildhaber | Feb 1966 | A |
3272130 | Mosbacher | Nov 1966 | A |
3653790 | Ifield | Apr 1972 | A |
3816038 | Berry | Jun 1974 | A |
3816039 | Berry | Jun 1974 | A |
3856440 | Wildhaber | Dec 1974 | A |
D263970 | Wiholm | Apr 1982 | S |
4702206 | Harries | Oct 1987 | A |
4721445 | Hoffmann | Jan 1988 | A |
5056314 | Paul et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5513969 | Arnold | May 1996 | A |
5755196 | Klassen | May 1998 | A |
6032636 | Kajino | Mar 2000 | A |
6036463 | Klassen | Mar 2000 | A |
6146120 | Harms | Nov 2000 | A |
6497564 | Klassen | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6769889 | Maier et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6887057 | Klassen | May 2005 | B2 |
6923055 | Klassen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20020037228 | Arnold | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20110311351 | Patterson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2069607 | Nov 1993 | CA |
1551081 | Apr 1970 | DE |
3221994 | Dec 1983 | DE |
916277 | Aug 1946 | FR |
5686 | Jan 1902 | GB |
805370 | Dec 1958 | GB |
1099085 | Jan 1968 | GB |
268459 | Jan 1933 | IT |
4329764 | Dec 1943 | JP |
5572683 | May 1980 | JP |
9961753 | Dec 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wankel, Felix, Rotary Piston Machines, Jan. 1, 1965. |
George, Michael, Granco Positive Displacement Pump, Plant Engineering Magazine, Dec. 10, 1981. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61235640 | Aug 2009 | US |