This invention relates generally to offshore drilling of wells using floating and non-floating platforms.
A floating platform may be moved to a position over a potential well location. The well may be drilled and may be coupled to the rig by a marine riser. Conventionally, there is a substantial distance between the floating platform and the seabed surface. For example, this distance may be several thousand feet. As a result, it is necessary to lower various drill strings, casings, and risers from the surface to the seabed floor.
The cost associated with drilling wells with offshore floating platforms may be substantial. For example, rental rates for offshore mobile platforms may run in the range of $300,000.00 a day. Significant time may be spent running various equipment from the rig down to the subsea floor. This time may result in a substantial portion of the cost.
Often, it is desirable to drill one well, pick up, and move to another location. The need to connect to a well from the surface involves substantial expenditure of time and, therefore, expense.
To address these problems, so-called dual activity rigs have been proposed. In a dual activity rig there may be two derricks, including a main derrick, used for running and hanging off the blowout preventer, and an auxiliary derrick, used to drill the top hole and run surface casing. A blowout preventer riser may be hung off from the rig while the drill string is operating to form the hole.
Dual operations may save time from the time a rig arrives on location to the landing of the blowout preventer. This is because the riser and the blowout preventer can be made up and run off line.
Thus, there is a need for still better ways to save time during offshore floating platform drilling activities.
Referring to
Also beneath the deck 14 are the floats 80. Suspended downwardly is a string 82 coupled to a guide base 35. The guide base 35 is intended to be positioned on the seabed floor (SB) but, in
In the position shown in
Upon arriving at the drilling site, all that would be necessary then is to connect the guide base 35 to the larger diameter casing. In one embodiment, about 4 joints of 36″ casing may be secured to the guide base 34 so that the guide base 35 and casing 22 can be lowered on the string 82 to the seabed floor (SB).
Referring to
Referring to
Thus, as shown in
The bottom hole assembly 28 is pulled out of the hole 36. Then, the smaller diameter casing 20 is run into the hole 36, which may just be formed by the bottom hole assembly 28, as shown in
More particularly, the casing 20 is provided through the guide base 35 into the hole 36 to a desired depth. As shown in
Referring to
Thus, the trolley 16 may be advanced to the extension 62 where the made up, hung off, casing 20 has been pre-positioned. The trolley 16 is positioned so that the slot 90 overlays the extension 62. The tool 72 then lifts the casing 20 from the extension 62 and mounts it on the trolley 16. The trolley 16 thereafter advances over the moon pool 68 so that the casing 20 may be lowered into the hole 36.
The casing 20 may be stored horizontally on racks 64 and advanced by a conveyor 66. The casing 20 then may be rotated to a vertical orientation and transferred by a crane 69 into the extension 62. A larger crane 70 may be utilized to support operations through the moon pool 68.
Referring next to
Finally, referring to
Once the well is completed, and it is desired to move to another location, the operation may be reversed. The blowout preventer 24 and riser 25 may be removed from the guide base 35, reattached to the trolley 18, and moved to the stored position shown in
In some embodiments of the present invention, substantial time may be saved in offshore drilling operations. These savings arise by virtue of the fact that multiple operations may be done in a parallel, rather than serially. For example, the smaller diameter casing 20 is pre-made up and, therefore, the time to make up the casing does not add to the overall drilling time. That is, the casing 20 was made up while the casing 22 was being jetted in. Likewise, the cementing and the running in of the smaller diameter casing 20 may be partly done offline, as may be the removal of the landing string from the hole. Finally, the time to run in the blowout preventer 24 may be substantially shortened because the blowout preventer 24 has already been made up and hung off, offline.
Thus, in some cases, from 2 to 4 days may be saved over other techniques when drilling in water depths on the order of 5000 feet. Of course, the present invention is in no way limited to any particular drilling depth and may be applicable to any of a variety of well depths. While a floating embodiment is depicted, fixed or stationary platforms may also be used in some cases.
While the present invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of this present invention.
This application is based on provisional application No. 60/576,156, filed Jun. 2, 2004.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2005/002362 | 6/1/2005 | WO | 00 | 11/17/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/118999 | 12/15/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3895677 | Bokenkamp | Jul 1975 | A |
3981369 | Bokenkamp | Sep 1976 | A |
4007782 | Nybo et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4044895 | Adair | Aug 1977 | A |
4288177 | Schoonmade | Sep 1981 | A |
4367796 | Bolding | Jan 1983 | A |
4574241 | Stelly | Mar 1986 | A |
4708563 | Van Den Berg et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4716972 | Makinen et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4819730 | Williford et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4899682 | Pouget et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5647443 | Broeder | Jul 1997 | A |
6047781 | Scott et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056071 | Scott et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068069 | Scott et al. | May 2000 | A |
6085851 | Scott et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6217258 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6321675 | Dybdahl et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6766860 | Archibald et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6902007 | Orr et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6926488 | Bolding et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6955223 | Orr et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7086474 | Trevithick et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
20030159853 | Archibald et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 291 664 | Jan 1996 | GB |
Entry |
---|
“Stena DrillMAXX, A dual mast, dynamically positioned, harsh environment, ultra deepwater drillship”, Stena Drilling Limited. |
Preliminary Proposal from Smedvig Dual Operation Drilling, Feb. 1996. |
Malaysia Patent Office, Substantive Examination Report for Application No. PI 20052521, 5 pages, Jul. 31, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070251725 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60576156 | Jun 2004 | US |