Multiple aperture probe internal apparatus and cable assemblies

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9788813
  • Patent Number
    9,788,813
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 12, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 17, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
A Multiple Aperture Ultrasound Imaging (MAUI) probe or transducer is uniquely capable of simultaneous imaging of a region of interest from separate physical apertures of ultrasound arrays. The probe can include separate backing plates configured to secure the ultrasound arrays in predetermined positions and orientations relative to one another. Some embodiments of the probe include flex circuit connected to the ultrasound arrays. In additional embodiments, a flex/PC board comprising flex connectors and an array of terminals is connected to the ultrasound arrays. Algorithms can solve for variations in tissue speed of sound, thus allowing the probe apparatus to be used virtually anywhere in or on the body.
Description
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


FIELD

The present invention relates generally to imaging techniques, and more particularly to ultrasound imaging techniques, and still more particularly to an apparatus for producing ultrasonic images using multiple apertures.


BACKGROUND

In conventional ultrasonic imaging, a focused beam of ultrasound energy is transmitted into body tissues to be examined and the returned echoes are detected and plotted to form an image.


In order to insonify the body tissues, a beam formed either by a phased array or a shaped transducer is scanned over the tissues to be examined. Traditionally, the same transducer or array is used to detect the returning echoes. This design configuration lies at the heart of one of the most significant limitations in the use of ultrasonic imaging for medical purposes; namely, poor lateral resolution. Theoretically the lateral resolution could be improved by increasing the aperture of the ultrasonic probe, but the practical problems involved with aperture size increase have kept apertures small and lateral resolution large. Unquestionably, ultrasonic imaging has been very useful even with this limitation, but it could be more effective with better resolution.


In the practice of cardiology, for example, the limitation on single aperture size is dictated by the space between the ribs (the intercostal spaces). For scanners intended for abdominal and other use (e.g. intracavity or intravenous), the limitation on aperture size is a serious limitation as well. The problem is that it is difficult to keep the elements of a large aperture array in phase because the speed of ultrasound transmission varies with the type of tissue between the probe and the area of interest. According to Wells (Biomedical Ultrasonics, as cited above), the transmission speed varies up to plus or minus 10% within the soft tissues. When the aperture is kept small, the intervening tissue is, to a first order of approximation, all the same and any variation is ignored. When the size of the aperture is increased to improve the lateral resolution, the additional elements of a phased array may be out of phase and may actually degrade the image rather than improving it.


With single aperture transducers, it has been commonly assumed that the beam paths used by the elements of the transducer are close enough together to be considered similar in tissue density profile, and therefore no compensation was necessary. The use of this assumption, however, severely limits the size of the aperture that can be used.


SUMMARY

Multiple aperture ultrasound probes may be constructed with unique cable assemblies, multiple flex connectors, and unique backing plate constructions, and unique electrical connections to reduce noise and improve the quality of images produced using multiple aperture ultrasound imaging techniques. The embodiments provided herein allow for effective mechanical and electrical connection of ultrasound transducer elements and arrays to probes and imaging control electronics.


In one embodiment, a multiple aperture ultrasound probe is provided, comprising a probe housing containing a first ultrasound array and a second ultrasound array, a first flex circuit connected to the first ultrasound array, a second flex circuit connected to the second ultrasound array, a backing plate configured to secure the first and second ultrasound arrays in predetermined positions and orientations relative to one another, a first coaxial cable group electrically connected to the first flex circuit, a second coaxial cable group electrically connected to the second flex circuit, and a flex/PC board comprising flex connectors and an array of terminals, wherein said flex connectors are connected to said first and second flex circuits, and wherein said terminals are connected to said first and second coaxial cable groups.


In some embodiments, the first and second ultrasound arrays comprise a plurality of transducer elements, wherein each element is connected to the flex/PC board with a differential pair of conductors having a signal ground separated from a chassis ground.


In one embodiment, the backing plate is electrically connected to chassis grounding circuitry via the transducer cable shield originating at an electronic control system. In another embodiment, the backing plate internally supports the probe structure.


In some embodiments, the multiple aperture ultrasound probe further comprises a calibration chip mounted on the flex/PC board. In some embodiments, the calibration chip is configured to store position and orientation information about the first and second ultrasound arrays.


In some embodiments, the multiple aperture ultrasound probe further comprises a probe position sensor mounted on the flex/PC board.


In another embodiment, the multiple aperture ultrasound probe further comprise a synchronization module mounted on the flex/pc board, the synchronization module being configured to synchronize an add-on ultrasound device with the first and second ultrasound arrays.


In one embodiment, the multiple aperture ultrasound probe further comprises a third ultrasound array secured to the backing plate, a third flex circuit connected to the third ultrasound array, a third coaxial cable group electrically connected to the third flex circuit, wherein flex connectors of the flex/PC board are connected to the third flex circuit and terminals of the flex/PC board are connected to the third cable group.


In one embodiment, the flex/PC board comprises a probe chassis ground circuit that is electrically connected to a shielding element surrounding a section of the first and second cable group bundles between the probe housing and a distal connector.


In another embodiment, at least one of the first array and the second array comprises an internal flex cabling configured to accommodate movement of the first ultrasound array away from the second ultrasound array.


In some embodiments, the probe further comprises a sliding portion configured to allow the first ultrasound array and the second ultrasound array to move laterally relative to the probe housing.


In one embodiment, at least one of the first ultrasound array and the second ultrasound array is configured to rotate about an axis of the probe housing.


In additional embodiments, the probe housing further comprises a lever configured to move the first ultrasound array or the second ultrasound array relative to the probe housing.


In some embodiments, the probe housing further comprising a dial and an electric motor configured to move the first ultrasound array or the second ultrasound array relative to the probe housing.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of transmit and receive functions of a Multiple Aperture Ultrasound Imaging (MAUI) probe.



FIG. 1A is a block diagram illustrating additional functions of a multiple aperture ultrasound imaging system.



FIG. 2 is an elevation view of one embodiment of a multiple aperture ultrasound probe with a top housing section removed to reveal components therein.



FIG. 2A illustrates one embodiment of a backing plate for securing multiple transducer arrays in predetermined positions and orientations with respect to each other within the probe housing.



FIG. 2B is a diagram of one embodiment of a flex circuit attaching directly to an ultrasound transducer array.



FIG. 2C is a diagram of one embodiment of a flex circuit for electrically connecting a single transducer array to probe electronic circuits.



FIG. 2D is a diagram of one embodiment of a flex/PC board that may provide electrical connections between flex circuits and coaxial cables.



FIG. 2E is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of multiple custom flex circuits terminating onto a flex/PC board.



FIG. 2F is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of connections between bundles of coaxial cables and a flex/PC board.



FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of a multiple aperture probe, cable and connector assembly.



FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of 1D, 1.5d or 2D arrays for use in a 3-array multiple aperture ultrasound probe.



FIG. 4A illustrates an embodiment of a 2-array multiple aperture transducer array.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of transmit and receive functions for a Multiple Aperture Ultrasound probe connected to a host ultrasound system and a separate add-on control system.



FIG. 5a is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of transmit and receive functions for a Multiple Aperture Ultrasound probe used in a two array format.



FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a multiple aperture probe, cable and connector assembly configured for connection to both a host ultrasound imaging control system and an add-on imaging control system.



FIG. 7 illustrates an embodiment of an adjustable, extendable two-array multiple aperture probe in a partially extended configuration.



FIG. 7A is a side view of the probe of FIG. 7 in a collapsed configuration with internal components visible.



FIG. 7B shows the probe of FIG. 7A in an extended configuration with internal components visible.



FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of a hand-held two-array multiple aperture probe with a non-adjustable fixed width.



FIG. 8A illustrates an embodiment of the probe of FIG. 8 with internal components visible.



FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of a multiple aperture omniplane transesophogeal (TEE) multiple aperture probe using three or more arrays.



FIG. 9A is a top view of the arrays of the probe of FIG. 9, including associated cabling without the encasement.



FIG. 9B illustrates a side view of the probe of FIG. 9 multiple aperture illustrating individual arrays secured by a backing plate.



FIG. 10 illustrates an embodiment of a multiple aperture intracavity probe using three arrays with a center array recessed to a point in line with the trailing edges of the outboard arrays with the outboard arrays canted at an angle α. A unified lens may be provided for ease of use as part of the external probe encasement.



FIG. 10A illustrates a side view of the probe of FIG. 10, showing individual arrays secured and positioned by a backing plate.



FIG. 10B is a top view of the probe of FIG. 10, showing three arrays and associated cabling internal to an intracavity probe without the encasement.



FIG. 11 is a side view of an embodiment of a multiple aperture intravenous ultrasound probe (IVUS) with three arrays where the center array is recessed from a point in line with the trailing edges of the outboard arrays with the outboard arrays canted at an angle α. A unified lens may be provided as part of the external probe encasement.



FIG. 11A illustrates a side view of the probe of FIG. 11 showing individual arrays secured and positioned by a backing plate.



FIG. 11B is a top view of the probe of FIG. 11, showing associated cabling internal to the IVUS probe without the encasement.



FIG. 12 illustrates a top view of an embodiment of a five array ultrasound probe.



FIG. 12A illustrates a side view of an embodiment of a multiple aperture probe with five arrays.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Multiple aperture ultrasound imaging probes may be substantially improved by providing unique cable assemblies, flex connectors, and backing blocks and other components to improve ultrasound signal quality and overall imaging performance. For example, unique backing blocks may be configured to maintain a desired geometry between adjacent elements and arrays that may not be attached to each other via a common substrate. Further, some embodiments of common substrates may be shaped in such a way that additional mechanical support systems provide substantial benefits. Systems and methods for effectively connecting ultrasound transducer elements and arrays both mechanically and electronically in multiple aperture probes are shown and described herein.


Embodiments of multiple aperture ultrasound imaging (MAUI) probes and methods of using them to obtain high resolution ultrasound images are shown and described in Applicants' prior US patent applications, which are referenced above.


As described in the above-referenced patents and applications, the structure of a MAUI Probe can vary substantially to meet the needs of a particular application. For example, a general radiology probe (an embodiment of which is shown in FIG. 2) may contain multiple arrays that maintain separate physical points of contact with the patient's skin, allowing multiple physical imaging apertures. A cardiac probe (an embodiment of which is shown in FIG. 7) may contain as few as two arrays allowing the probe to fit simultaneously between two or more intercostal spaces. An intracavity version of a MAUI probe (an embodiment of which is shown in FIGS. 9-9B), may have arrays positioned along the length of a wand, while an intravenous MAUI probe (an embodiment of which is shown in FIG. 13) may allow the arrays to be located on the distal length the catheter and separated by mere millimeters. In each of these application-specific probe embodiments, a plurality of transducer arrays may be positioned and contained by a single backing plate configured to support each of the arrays in a desired position at a desired specified angle relative to the other arrays of the probe. Details of the angle and position of probes may depend on the intended function of a probe.


As used herein the terms “ultrasound transducer” and “transducer” may carry their ordinary meanings as understood by those skilled in the art of ultrasound imaging technologies, and may refer without limitation to any component capable of converting an electrical signal into an ultrasonic signal and/or vice versa. For example, in some embodiments, an ultrasound transducer may comprise a piezoelectric device. In other embodiments, ultrasound transducers may comprise capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducers (CMUT).


Ultrasound transducers are often configured in arrays of multiple individual transducer elements. As used herein, the terms “transducer array” or “array” generally refers to a collection of transducer elements mounted to a common substrate. Such arrays may have one dimension (1D), two dimensions (2D), 1.5 dimensions (1.5D) as understood by those skilled in the art. Other dimensioned arrays as understood by those skilled in the art may also be used. Transducer arrays may be made from piezoelectric materials, CMUT materials or any other suitable material. An element of a transducer array may be the smallest discretely functional component of an array. For example, in the case of an array of piezoelectric transducer elements, a single element may be a single piezoelectric crystal or a single machined section of a piezoelectric crystal. A transducer array may include any number of individual transducer elements as needed. Thus, in some embodiments an array may include a single element, and in other embodiments an array my include hundreds of elements. Unless specified otherwise for a particular embodiment, the embodiments herein may use any suitable ultrasound transducer array.


As used herein, the term “aperture” refers to a conceptual “opening” through which ultrasound signals may be sent and/or received. In actual practice, an aperture is simply a group of transducer elements that are collectively managed as a common group by imaging control electronics. For example, in some embodiments an aperture may be a physical grouping of elements which may be physically separated from elements of an adjacent aperture. For example, each of the three transducer arrays in the probe of FIG. 2 may be treated as a separate aperture. However, adjacent apertures need not necessarily be physically separated.


In some embodiments, two apertures may be located adjacent one another on a continuous array. In other embodiments, two apertures may overlap one another on a continuous array, such that at least one element functions as part of two separate apertures. The location, function, number of elements and physical size of an aperture may be defined dynamically in any manner needed for a particular application. Constraints on these parameters for a particular application will be discussed below.



FIGS. 1 and 1A provide schematic illustrations of a multiple aperture ultrasound imaging process. Control electronics 140 may be provided to control the physical function of elements located within the different apertures 110, 120, and 130 of a Multiple Aperture Ultrasound Probe. FIGS. 1 and 1A demonstrate that in some embodiments, transmissions from two different apertures 120 in FIGS. 1 and 130 in FIG. 2 can be used to illuminate a target 170, while elements in all apertures 110, 120 and 130 can all be used for receive beamforming.


In some embodiments, a multiple aperture ultrasound imaging probe may be calibrated to precisely determine the acoustic position of each transducer element of each array. Embodiments of systems and methods for calibrating an ultrasound probe are provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/760,327. Thus, while calibration may allow for the use of complex arrays and probes (including adjustable probes), it is desirable that the transducer elements and arrays remain in the same physical position between calibration and use of a probe.


Some embodiments of multiple aperture ultrasound probes have several of the distinguishing features illustrated in FIG. 2. For example, the probe 200 of FIG. 2 includes three transducer arrays 210, 220 and 230, which are physically separated from one another and oriented at different “look angles” with respect to a region of interest to be imaged. While the probe 200 of FIG. 2 includes three transducer arrays, the features and advantages of the embodiments herein may be realized with probes having any number of independent transducer arrays, including arrays with non-planar shapes.


In some embodiments, each array may be constructed with a separate substrate or backing block (e.g. see 460 in FIGS. 4 and 4A). The backing block may be configured to structurally support the elements of an array in a desired shape (e.g., a planar shape). Backing blocks may be made of any substantially rigid material, such as metals, plastics, ceramics, etc. In some embodiments, a probe with multiple arrays may include arrays that all have the same shape and dimensions. In other embodiments, a probe with multiple arrays may include arrays that all have different shapes and/or dimensions. For example, one or more arrays in a multiple-array probe may be circular, elliptical, oblong, rectangular, square, polygonal or other symmetrical or asymmetrical shapes. In some embodiments, a probe with multiple arrays may include one or more arrays that are entirely or partially configured to transmit and/or receive ultrasound signals of a different frequency than other arrays in the probe.


Spacing between arrays (e.g., see 480 in FIGS. 4 and 4A) may vary, and need not be evenly distributed across a probe. In some embodiments, arrays may be arranged symmetrically or asymmetrically in a probe.


Referring back to FIG. 2, a probe may also include a transmit synchronization module 280 for identifying the start of pulse in certain applications. In some embodiments, a probe displacement sensor 290 may also be included within a probe housing. In some embodiments, the probe displacement sensor 290 may be an accelerometer or gyroscope configured to sense the three dimensional movement of the probe. In some embodiments, a calibration chip 295 may also be provided in the probe housing. In further embodiments, additional electrical or electronic components may also be included within the probe housing.


In some embodiments, a plurality of arrays within a single probe, such as the three arrays 210, 220, 230 in the probe of FIG. 2, may share a common backing plate 201 that is configured to secure the arrays in a designed position and orientation relative to one another and relative to the probe housing.


In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the angle α1 160 is the angle between a line parallel to the elements of the left array 110 and an intersecting line parallel to the elements of the center array 120. Similarly, the angle α2 165 is the angle between a line parallel to the elements of the right array 130 and an intersecting line parallel to the elements of the center array 120. Angle α1 and angle α2 need not be equal. In some embodiments, there are benefits in achieving optimum beamforming if the two angles 160, 165 are nearly equal.



FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment of a MAUI probe 200 having three transducer arrays mounted in a housing 275 at static or pre-set mechanical positions and angles relative to one another and relative to the probe housing 275. The lateral arrays 210, 230 may be fixed at a desired position and angle, α, relative to the central array 220 by attaching all three arrays 210, 220, 230 onto a single backing plate 201.


In some embodiments, as shown in FIG. 2 for example, the lateral arrays 210, 230 may both be positioned at an angle α of about 12.5° relative to the central array 220. In some embodiments, the angle α may be varied in order to optimize a probe for a particular imaging application. In other embodiments, the angle α of one or both lateral arrays relative to a central array may vary within a range of values to optimize imaging performance at different depths.


For a scatterer at a given depth, the effective aperture of a substantially planar lateral array is proportional to the sine of the angle between a line from the scatterer to the center of the lateral array and a line on the surface of the array itself. For example, with the lateral arrays positioned at an angle α of about 12.5°, the effective aperture of the lateral sub arrays is optimized at a depth of about 10 cm from the tissue surface, which may be beneficial when imaging cardiac features. Thus, in some embodiments, the angle α may be chosen as the best compromise for tissues at a desired depth range.



FIG. 2A illustrates an embodiment of a backing plate 201 which may be used to mount three arrays into a multiple aperture ultrasound probe housing, such as that shown in FIG. 2. In some embodiments, the backing block may be configured to support lateral transducer arrays at an angle α relative to the central array. In some embodiments, the backing plate 210 may include slots 203 for receiving and retaining the backing blocks 460 of transducer arrays.


The backing plate 201 may be constructed by any suitable manufacturing process including machining, stamping, forging, casting, molding, 3D printing, etc. In some embodiments, the backing plate 201 may be constructed with sufficiently strict tolerances that array backing blocks fit snugly within the slots 203. In some embodiments, array backing blocks may be secured to the backing plate 201 with mechanical fasteners, adhesives, press fits or any other suitable method.


In some embodiments, transducer arrays may be manufactured with electrical contacts exposed on one or more side surfaces of the array and/or backing block material. A flex circuit may be electrically connected to those contacts. In such embodiments, the backing plate 201 may be configured to leave such array electrical contacts exposed so as to allow flex circuits to be electrically connected to the arrays. For example, the backing plate 201 may include one or more slots, channels or openings to accommodate such electrical connections. In other embodiments, a backing plate 201 may include one or more connectors configured to electrically connect array elements to corresponding flex circuit conductors while keeping the array element connections insulated from the backing block.


In some embodiments, the backing plate 201 may include one or more ribs in order to provide additional mechanical rigidity without necessarily adding weight to the probe. The backing plate 201 may also include any number of mounting flanges 202 or other structures configured to allow the backing plate 201 to be secured to one or more probe housing components. In some embodiments, the backing plate 201 may be secured to a probe housing shell 175 with mechanical fasteners, adhesives, press fits, or other methods. In some embodiments, a backing plate 201 may be formed integrally with a probe housing component.


In some embodiments, the backing plate 201 may also be used to complete a separate electrical grounding circuit, which will be referred to herein as a chassis ground. A chassis ground circuit, which will be discussed in more detail below, may extend from the backing plate, through a cable, through a connector and to an ultrasound imaging control/display system.


In some embodiments, as shown in FIG. 2B, a lens 215 may be provided at a front surface of each transducer array. In some embodiments, a second common lens may be provided in front of each of the multiple arrays. In some embodiments, the individual lenses, or a single common lens may form a seal with the probe housing 275 to prevent coupling gel or other liquids from getting inside of the probe. In some embodiments, the front surfaces of the lenses of arrays 210, 220, and 230 may combine with the probe encasement 275 to form a substantially continuous concave arc.


In some embodiments, a multiple aperture ultrasound probe 200 may be a handheld apparatus that operates at a location remote from a base unit system configured to send and receive ultrasound signals. In some embodiments, communication between a multiple aperture probe and a base unit system may be performed through a cable that both mechanically and electrically connects the probe to a base unit system (or systems) configured to send and receive ultrasound signals. In some embodiments, it is advantageous to provide separate cabling and connections to each of the arrays or individual elements within a probe assembly.



FIG. 3 illustrates a multiple aperture ultrasound probe 200 including a cable 310 and connector 325. In some embodiments, strain relief elements 320 may be provided at junctions where the cable 310 connects to the connector housing and the probe housing. In some embodiments, the cable 310 is electrically connected to a flex/PC board 218 (examples of such connections are discussed below with reference to FIG. 2D). In some embodiments, the cable 310 may comprise a shielded construction in which a continuous conductor (e.g. a braid or thin foil) surrounds a bundle of individual conductors.


In some embodiments, the bundle of conductors may include a plurality of coaxial cables, which are themselves individually shielded. In some embodiments, the cable bundle may also include coaxial conductors that may be electrically connected to additional electronic components within the probe housing, such as a probe displacement sensor 290, a calibration chip 295 and/or a synchronization module 280.


In some embodiments, the cable may also include a tensile strain relief member, such as a steel cable (or other high tensile strength and low stretch material) configured to carry substantially an entire mechanical tensile load applied between the probe 200 and the connector 325.


In some embodiments, cable arrangements within a multiple aperture imaging probe may be uniquely configured for high quality transmission of electronic signals between each individual transducer element and an imaging control system (e.g., MAUI electronics or another host control system). In some embodiments, each transducer element may be electrically connected to an imaging control system with a unique differential pair of conductors. Such arrangements substantially reduce difficulties caused by cross-talk and other forms of electrical and/or electromagnetic interference.


In some embodiments, a probe may also be provided with a separate chassis ground circuit that is separate from any of the individual element grounds. In some embodiments, the chassis ground circuit may also be electrically connected to a shielding conductor surrounding other conductors in a cable bundle extending from the probe to a connector. An imaging control system may be configured to join the shield ground to a true earth ground. In some embodiments, an interior surface of a probe housing may also include a continuous electrically conductive layer for providing further shielding.



FIGS. 2B and 2C illustrate an embodiment of a unique flex circuit 217 for electrically connecting a transducer array to a flex/PC board 218 which may be further connected to a cable. In some embodiments, a flex circuit 217 may provide a differential pair electrical connection from each element of a transducer array to a terminal end 219. FIG. 2B illustrates a circuit 217 with an element-connection end connected to a backing block of a transducer array. FIG. 2C illustrates a two-sided flex circuit 217 with two rows of element connectors 205 configured to be electrically connected to elements of a transducer array. The element connectors 221 of the flex circuit 217 may be electrically connected to the array's elements either in manufacturing or after via surface mount connectors, surface solder joints or any other suitable method. In alternative embodiments, individual cables may be used in place of flex circuits for electrically connecting transducer array elements to a PC board or directly to a cable.


In some embodiments, the terminal end 219 of a flex circuit 217 may include an array of connectors 206 configured to be connected to corresponding flex terminal connectors 222 on a first side of the flex/PC board 218. FIG. 2E illustrates the flex connector side of the flex/PC board 218 with a pair of flex circuits 217 connected to a flex/PC board 218. In some embodiments, a flex/PC board 218 may be a substantially rigid printed circuit board with one or more flex terminal connectors 222 on one face, and an array of cable terminals on the opposite face. In some embodiments, circuit conductors may be printed into the board to provide electrical connections between flex circuit conductors and corresponding cable terminals. The flex/PC board 218 may also include grounding pads 223 which may be electrically connected to the chassis ground circuit.


In some embodiments, a flex/PC board 218 may be configured to keep the signal coaxial cables grounded separately from the chassis and/or outer cable shielding ground. FIG. 2D illustrates an array of connection terminals on the cable-connector side of the flex/PC board 218. As shown, the array of connections may include rows of ground terminals 224G paired with rows of signal terminals 224S.



FIG. 2F illustrates the connections of the individual coaxial cables from the cable bundle 310 to individual element-specific terminals on the flex/PC board 218. Each coaxial cable in the cable bundle may include an outer insulator, a shield conductor, an inner insulator and a central conductor. The central conductor may be referred to as the signal conductor, because it normally carries the electrical signals from the imaging control system to the transducer elements and back. In some embodiments, coaxial cables may be micro-coaxial cables (or “microcoax” cables), which may be about 42 gauge to about 58 gauge (or about 0.0025 inches to about 0.00039 inches in diameter).


In some embodiments, the signal conductor of each coaxial cable may be soldered to a corresponding signal terminal 224S, and the shield conductor of the same coaxial cable may be soldered to a corresponding ground terminal 224G. Thus, in some embodiments, there is no electrical path from a particular signal ground to any other signal ground. Similarly, embodiments may be configured such that no signal ground has an electrical path to the common chassis ground.


In some embodiments, coaxial cable conductors may be soldered directly to the contacts of the flex/PC board 218. In other embodiments, various mechanical connectors or clamps may alternatively be used. In further embodiments, any other wiring harness or connector may be used as desired.


As shown in FIG. 2F, a cable clamp 227 may also be provided to provide mechanical and/or electrical connection to the probe housing. In some embodiments, the cable clamp 227 may be electrically connected to the chassis ground tabs 223. In some embodiments, the cable clamp 227 may also be mechanically connected to the flex/PC board or directly to the probe housing. The cable clamp may also provide a mechanical attachment for a tensile strain relief element of the cable.


In some embodiments, a flex/PC board may also be configured to perform other functions by including additional integrated circuit chips soldered or otherwise electrically connected to the board.


In some embodiments, the flex/PC board may be used to re-task elements to either transmit or receive functions, such as by using dynamic electronic switching arrangements, or by configuring the connection of coaxial cables to terminals in varying arrangements.


In some embodiments, the flex/PC board may be used to arbitrate signals so that fewer cables are required in the bundles. For example, in some embodiments, a single coaxial cable may be electrically connected to the contacts of more than one transducer element (e.g., by using jumpers to connect selected terminals 224). In other embodiments, electronic switches may be provided on the flex/PC board to allow for dynamic switching of the relationship between a transducer element and a coaxial cable. Thus, in some embodiments, a cable bundle 310 may include fewer cable pairs than the number of individual transducer elements, while still providing substantial benefits of connecting elements with differential conductor pairs.


In other embodiments, the flex/PC board may include components configured to arbitrate signals for transmission to imaging control electronics via one or more fiber optic cables. For example, electrical to fiber optic conversion components and fiber optic coupling components may be mounted to the flex/PC board in order to convert electrical signals from the transducer elements into optical signals to be transmitted to an imaging control system via a fiber optic cable bundle in place of the coaxial cable bundle 310.


In alternative embodiments, all coaxial cables may be omitted, and a wireless communications chip may be provided in the probe housing and configured to communicate with an ultrasound imaging control system wirelessly. In some embodiments, such a wireless communications chip may be based on one or more common wireless data transmission standards, such as the IEEE 802.11 standards (e.g., “WiFi”), IEEE 802.15 standards (e.g., “Bluetooth”) or others. A wireless communications chip may be soldered or otherwise connected to a flex/PC board which may also include flex connectors electrically connected to flex circuits connected to transducer arrays.


Some embodiments of multiple aperture probes can also be constructed to operate as add-on devices to any ultrasound imaging host system, even those not specifically configured to operate multiple aperture probes. FIGS. 5 and 5A provide block diagrams illustrating two multiple aperture ultrasound imaging operations utilizing a standard host ultrasound system and a multiple aperture ultrasound imaging add-on device. In the example of FIG. 5, the center array 120 may be used for transmit only. The lateral arrays 110 and 130 may be used for receive only. The embodiment of FIG. 5A demonstrates the right array 120 being used to transmit, and the left array 110 being used to receive ultrasound signals.



FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a three-array multiple aperture probe 200 with cables and connectors for using the probe with an add-on system. Such a system may include substantially similar construction discussed above from the probe 200 to the junction box 660. From the junction box, the bundle of coaxial cables may be divided into a first cable branch 311 with a first connector 620 and a second branch 312 with a second connector 640. The first connector 620 may be configured to be attached to a host ultrasound system which provides transmit energy to the transmit array. The second connector 640 may be configured to connect to a stand-alone MAUI electronics system configured to receive and interpret echoes to generate images. Like the single system, the add-on system cabling coming from the multiple aperture probe may be bundled together so as to provide ease of use and maneuverability for an operator. In some embodiments, cable junction boxes 660 and strain reliefs 320 may be used on all cables.



FIGS. 7-13A provide several additional embodiments illustrating examples of multiple aperture ultrasound probe construction and cable assemblies. These examples represent some of the possible application-specific multiple aperture probes that may be constructed. Many variations in size and layout of each of the probes described herein are also possible.



FIGS. 7-7B illustrate an embodiment of a multiple aperture probe 700 having a design and features that make it particularly well suited for cardiac applications. As illustrated in FIG. 7, some embodiments of a multiple aperture probe 700 may include a pair of legs 710, 720 joined by a common central portion 740. In the embodiment of FIG. 7, the central body portion 740 is configured to allow the legs to slide relative to one another. Each leg portion 710, 720 may include a transducer array 810, 820 respectively on a lower surface.


In some embodiments, a sensor 775 can be provided on or adjacent to the slidable central portion 740. Such a sensor can be configured to transmit mechanical position information of each of the legs 710, 720 back to the MAUI electronics. Suitable sensors may include optical sensors, digital encoders, potentiometers or any other suitable sensor.


The embodiment in FIG. 7 illustrates a thumb wheel 730 that may be used to physically adjust the position of the legs 710, 720. In alternative embodiments, any other mechanism or device may be provided to control size adjustment of the probe.


In the illustrated embodiment, one leg of the probe 710 may encase one flex circuit 760, and the other leg 720 may encase a separate flex circuit 765. The flex circuits in these embodiments may be any of the types described above,


Similarly to the embodiments above, the probe may include individual flex circuits 760, 765 in each leg 710, 720. The flex circuits may be attached via connectors to separate flex/pc boards 770, 775 configured with suitable shapes and sizes to fit within the probe housing. In some embodiments, the extender 740 section may enclose an extra length of coaxial cable bundles 780 as slack to accommodate adjustment of the legs. The cables may then be bundled together and inserted into strain relief 755.



FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of a fixed-position multiple aperture probe of similar shape to those shown in FIGS. 7-7B. The distance between the legs 840 may be fixed to be used in cardiac applications where it is desirable to “see” between or around ribs and through the intercostal spaces. Such probes may also be useful in other applications.


In the embodiment of FIG. 8A, the arrays are shown angled 160 for optimizing beamforming characteristics as discussed above. In some embodiments, the arrays of any of the probes of FIGS. 7-8A may be mounted to respective backing plates similar to those described above for the purpose of securely holding the arrays in a desired position. Such backing plates may be configured to secure and position the arrays at a desired angle, a.


The embodiments shown in FIGS. 9-9B provide a multiple aperture ultrasound Probe for very high resolution imaging by inserting the probe into a body lumen, such as a patient's esophagus. The embodiments of FIGS. 9-9B provide an ultrasound probe that may be mounted to a distal end of an elongate catheter or endoscope configured for positioning and steering the distal probe to a desired position within a body lumen.



FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of an Omniplane Style Transesophogeal probe where FIG. 9A is a cut away top view and FIG. 9B is a cut away side view. In this embodiment, an enclosure 940 may contain multiple aperture arrays 910, 920 and 930 that are contained and positioned on a backing plate 992. The backing plate may be mounted on a rotating turn table 982 which can be operated mechanically or electrically to rotate the arrays about an axis perpendicular to the surface of the center array (i.e., an axis perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the catheter). The enclosure 940 may contain suitable echo-lucent material to facilitate the transfer of ultrasound echo information with a minimum of degradation, and is contained by an acoustic window 950. The operator may manipulate the probe with controls 990 located inside the flex circuit 991. In some embodiments, the flex circuit 991 may be coiled around the arrays allowing the operator to change the arrays' orientation with adequate slack.


In FIG. 9A, the flex circuit 991 is shown terminating into the ends of the elements of each array at 992.


In FIG. 9B, the arrays 910, 920, 930 are shown physically separated from each by a length 980 of a backing block 984. In some such embodiments, each array 910, 920, 930 may have a separate flex connection 992. In some embodiments, coaxial cables may be connected to the common terminal 990 and then placed into a common cable as described above.



FIG. 10 illustrates an embodiment of an intracavity probe where FIG. 10A is a cut away side view and FIG. 10B is a cut away top view. In some embodiments, an enclosure 1000 may contain multiple aperture arrays 1010, 1020 and 1030 that are captured and positioned by a backing plate 1082. The enclosure 1000 may contain suitable echo-lucent material 1050 to facilitate the transfer of ultrasound echo information with a minimum of degradation, and may be contained by an acoustic window 1040.


As shown in FIG. 10A, the arrays may be physically separated from each other and held in the shown position by a backing plate 1082. In some embodiments, each array may have a separate flex circuit 1092. The flex circuit 1092 may extend the length of the enclosure 1000 until the flex circuit 1092 reaches the flex/PC board 1090. Coaxial cables extending from a connector may be connected to the flex/PC board 1090. The flex circuits and the coaxial cable may be connected via the flex/PC board in the enclosure.


As shown in FIG. 10B, the flex circuit 1091 may into the ends of each array's elements at 1092.



FIG. 11 illustrates an embodiment of an Intravenous Ultrasound (IVUS) probe where FIG. 11A is a cut away side view and FIG. 11B is a cut-away top view. In this embodiment, an enclosure 1200 contains multiple aperture arrays 1210, 1220 and 1230 that are captured and positioned by a backing plate 1282. The enclosure 1200 may contain suitable echo-lucent material 1250 to facilitate the transfer of ultrasound echo information with a minimum of degradation, and may be contained by an acoustic window 1240.


As shown in FIG. 11A, the arrays may be physically separated from each other and held in the shown position by a backing plate 1282. In some embodiments, each array may have a separate flex circuit 1292. The flex circuit may extend the length of the enclosure until it reaches the flex/PC board 1290. Coaxial cables extending from a connector may be connected to the flex/PC board 1290. The flex circuits and the coaxial cable may be connected to one another via the flex/PC board in the enclosure.


In FIG. 11B, the flex circuit 1291 is shown terminating into the ends of each array's elements at 1292.



FIGS. 12-12A illustrates an embodiment of a multiple aperture probe configuration having five arrays 1310, 1320, 1330, 1340 and 1350 that could be used in many of the probes above. While there are five arrays demonstrated here, other embodiments may be configured to utilize more or fewer than five arrays. The number, size, spacing and orientation of the arrays in a particular embodiment may vary depending upon the target application of the probe. Arrays can be as small as an individual element (similar to a pedoff probe) and as large as a matrixed array that covers an entire body cavity. Consequently, arrays need not be positioned within the same transducer housing, furthering the benefits from accurate cable assemblies.


There also is no specific distance 1370 that must separate elements or arrays. The constraints of a symmetrical probe design are diminished by the greater flexibility in array placement enabled by embodiments of the present invention.


Terms such as “optimized,” “optimum,” “precise,” “exact” and similar terms used in relation to quantitative parameters are merely intended to indicate design parameters which may be controlled or varied in accordance with general engineering principles. Use of these terms is not intended to imply or require that the parameters or components thereof are designed for the best possible or theoretical performance.


The above disclosure is sufficient to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention, and provides the best mode of practicing the invention presently contemplated by the inventor. While there is provided herein a full and complete disclosure of the preferred embodiments of this invention, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction, dimensional relationships, and operation shown and described. Various modifications, alternative constructions, changes and equivalents will readily occur to those skilled in the art and may be employed, as suitable, without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Such changes might involve alternative materials, components, structural arrangements, sizes, shapes, forms, functions, operational features or the like.

Claims
  • 1. A multiple aperture ultrasound probe, comprising: a probe housing containing a first ultrasound array of transducer elements and a second ultrasound array of transducer elements;a flex/PC board comprising a plurality of signal and ground terminals corresponding to the transducer elements of the first and second ultrasound arrays;a first flex circuit comprising a plurality of differential pairs of signal and ground conductors, the first flex circuit being configured to connect each transducer element of the first ultrasound array to its corresponding signal and ground terminals on the flex/PC board with one of the differential pairs of signal and ground conductors of the first flex circuit;a second flex circuit comprising a plurality of differential pairs of signal and ground conductors, the second flex circuit being configured to connect each transducer element of the second ultrasound array to its corresponding signal and ground terminals of the flex/PC board with one of the differential pairs of signal and ground conductors of the second flex circuit;first and second groups of coaxial cables comprising a plurality of differential coaxial signal and ground conductors, the groups of coaxial cables being configured to connect the signal and ground terminals of the flex/PC board corresponding to the transducer elements of the first and second ultrasound arrays to an imaging controller with the differential coaxial signal and ground conductors of the first and second groups of coaxial cables; anda backing plate configured to secure the first and second ultrasound arrays in predetermined positions and orientations relative to one another, the backing plate comprising a chassis ground circuit separate from the ground conductors of the first and second flex circuits and from the differential coaxial ground conductors of the coaxial cables.
  • 2. The multiple aperture ultrasound probe of claim 1 wherein the backing plate internally supports the probe structure.
  • 3. The multiple aperture ultrasound probe of claim 1 further comprising a calibration chip mounted on the flex/PC board.
  • 4. The multiple aperture ultrasound probe of claim 3 wherein the calibration chip is configured to store position and orientation information about the first and second ultrasound arrays.
  • 5. The multiple aperture ultrasound probe of claim 1 further comprising a probe position sensor mounted on the flex/PC board.
  • 6. The multiple aperture ultrasound probe of claim 1 further comprising a synchronization module mounted on the flex/pc board, the synchronization module being configured to synchronize an add-on ultrasound device with the first and second ultrasound arrays.
  • 7. The multiple aperture ultrasound probe of claim 1 further comprising: a third ultrasound array of transducer elements secured to the backing plate;a third flex circuit comprising a plurality of differential pairs of signal and ground conductors, the third flex circuit being configured to connect each transducer element of the third ultrasound array to its corresponding signal and ground terminals of the flex/PC board with one of the differential pairs of signal and ground conductors; anda third group of coaxial cables comprising a plurality of differential coaxial signal and ground conductors, the third group of coaxial cables being configured to connect the signal and ground terminals of the flex/PC board corresponding to the transducer elements of the third ultrasound array to the imaging controller with the differential coaxial signal and ground conductors of the third group of coaxial cables.
  • 8. The multiple aperture ultrasound probe of claim 1 wherein at least one of the first ultrasound array and the second ultrasound array comprises an internal flex cabling configured to accommodate movement of the first ultrasound array away from the second ultrasound array.
  • 9. The multiple aperture ultrasound probe of claim 8 further comprising a sliding portion configured to allow the first ultrasound array and the second ultrasound array to move laterally relative to the probe housing.
  • 10. The multiple aperture ultrasound probe of claim 1 wherein at least one of the first ultrasound array and the second ultrasound array is configured to rotate about an axis of the probe housing.
  • 11. The multiple aperture ultrasound probe of claim 8, the probe housing further comprising a lever configured to move the first ultrasound array or the second ultrasound array relative to the probe housing.
  • 12. The multiple aperture ultrasound probe of claim 8, the probe housing further comprising a dial and an electric motor configured to move the first ultrasound array or the second ultrasound array relative to the probe housing.
  • 13. The multiple aperture ultrasound probe of claim 1, wherein at least one of the signal and ground conductors of the first coaxial cable group is electrically connected to more than one transducer element of the first ultrasound array.
  • 14. The multiple aperture ultrasound probe of claim 13 further comprising an electronic switch on the flex/PC board configured to allow for dynamic switching between the more than one transducer element of the first ultrasound array.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/392,841, filed Oct. 13, 2010, titled “MULTI APERTURE CABLE ASSEMBLY FOR MULTIPLE APERTURE PROBE FOR USE IN MEDICAL ULTRASOUND”, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is related to U.S. Pat. No. 8,007,439, issued Aug. 30, 2011, titled “Method and Apparatus to Produce Ultrasonic Images Using Multiple Apertures”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/760,375, filed Apr. 14, 2010, titled “Universal Multiple Aperture Medical Ultrasound Probe”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/002,778, filed Aug. 7, 2009, titled “Imaging With Multiple Aperture Medical Ultrasound and Synchronization of Add-On Systems”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/760,327, filed Apr. 14, 2010, titled “Multiple Aperture Ultrasound Array Alignment Fixture,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/760,375, filed Apr. 14, 2010, titled “Universal Multiple Aperture Medical Ultrasound Transducer”.

US Referenced Citations (442)
Number Name Date Kind
3174286 Erickson Mar 1965 A
3895381 Kock Jul 1975 A
3974692 Hassler Aug 1976 A
4055988 Dutton Nov 1977 A
4072922 Taner et al. Feb 1978 A
4097835 Green Jun 1978 A
4105018 Greenleaf et al. Aug 1978 A
4180792 Lederman et al. Dec 1979 A
4259733 Taner et al. Mar 1981 A
4265126 Papadofrangakis et al. May 1981 A
4271842 Specht et al. Jun 1981 A
4325257 Kino et al. Apr 1982 A
4327738 Green et al. May 1982 A
4333474 Nigam Jun 1982 A
4339952 Foster Jul 1982 A
4452084 Taenzer Jun 1984 A
4501279 Seo Feb 1985 A
4511998 Kanda et al. Apr 1985 A
4539847 Paap Sep 1985 A
4566459 Umemura et al. Jan 1986 A
4567768 Satoh et al. Feb 1986 A
4604697 Luthra et al. Aug 1986 A
4662222 Johnson May 1987 A
4669482 Ophir Jun 1987 A
4682497 Sasaki Jul 1987 A
4781199 Hirama et al. Nov 1988 A
4817434 Anderson Apr 1989 A
4831601 Breimesser et al. May 1989 A
4893284 Magrane Jan 1990 A
4893628 Angelsen Jan 1990 A
5050588 Grey et al. Sep 1991 A
5141738 Rasor et al. Aug 1992 A
5161536 Vilkomerson et al. Nov 1992 A
5197475 Antich et al. Mar 1993 A
5226019 Bahorich Jul 1993 A
5230339 Charlebois Jul 1993 A
5269309 Fort et al. Dec 1993 A
5278757 Hoctor et al. Jan 1994 A
5293871 Reinstein et al. Mar 1994 A
5299576 Shiba Apr 1994 A
5301674 Erikson et al. Apr 1994 A
5305756 Entrekin et al. Apr 1994 A
5339282 Kuhn et al. Aug 1994 A
5345426 Lipschutz Sep 1994 A
5349960 Gondo Sep 1994 A
5355888 Kendall Oct 1994 A
5381794 Tei et al. Jan 1995 A
5398216 Hall et al. Mar 1995 A
5409010 Beach et al. Apr 1995 A
5442462 Guissin Aug 1995 A
5454372 Banjanin et al. Oct 1995 A
5503152 Oakley et al. Apr 1996 A
5515853 Smith et al. May 1996 A
5515856 Olstad et al. May 1996 A
5522393 Phillips et al. Jun 1996 A
5526815 Granz et al. Jun 1996 A
5544659 Banjanin Aug 1996 A
5558092 Unger et al. Sep 1996 A
5564423 Mele et al. Oct 1996 A
5568812 Murashita et al. Oct 1996 A
5570691 Wright et al. Nov 1996 A
5581517 Gee et al. Dec 1996 A
5628320 Teo May 1997 A
5673697 Bryan et al. Oct 1997 A
5675550 Ekhaus Oct 1997 A
5720291 Schwartz Feb 1998 A
5720708 Lu et al. Feb 1998 A
5744898 Smith et al. Apr 1998 A
5769079 Hossack Jun 1998 A
5784334 Sena et al. Jul 1998 A
5785654 Iinuma et al. Jul 1998 A
5795297 Daigle Aug 1998 A
5797845 Barabash et al. Aug 1998 A
5798459 Ohba et al. Aug 1998 A
5820561 Olstad et al. Oct 1998 A
5838564 Bahorich et al. Nov 1998 A
5850622 Vassiliou et al. Dec 1998 A
5862100 VerWest Jan 1999 A
5870691 Partyka et al. Feb 1999 A
5876342 Chen et al. Mar 1999 A
5891038 Seyed-Bolorforosh et al. Apr 1999 A
5892732 Gersztenkorn Apr 1999 A
5916169 Hanafy et al. Jun 1999 A
5919139 Lin Jul 1999 A
5920285 Benjamin Jul 1999 A
5930730 Marfurt et al. Jul 1999 A
5940778 Marfurt et al. Aug 1999 A
5951479 Holm et al. Sep 1999 A
5964707 Fenster et al. Oct 1999 A
5969661 Benjamin Oct 1999 A
5999836 Nelson et al. Dec 1999 A
6007499 Martin et al. Dec 1999 A
6013032 Savord Jan 2000 A
6014473 Hossack et al. Jan 2000 A
6048315 Chiao et al. Apr 2000 A
6049509 Sonneland et al. Apr 2000 A
6050943 Slayton et al. Apr 2000 A
6056693 Haider May 2000 A
6058074 Swan et al. May 2000 A
6077224 Lang et al. Jun 2000 A
6092026 Bahorich et al. Jul 2000 A
6122538 Sliwa, Jr. et al. Sep 2000 A
6123670 Mo Sep 2000 A
6129672 Seward et al. Oct 2000 A
6135960 Holmberg Oct 2000 A
6138075 Yost Oct 2000 A
6148095 Prause et al. Nov 2000 A
6162175 Marian, Jr. et al. Dec 2000 A
6166384 Dentinger et al. Dec 2000 A
6166853 Sapia et al. Dec 2000 A
6193665 Hall et al. Feb 2001 B1
6196739 Silverbrook Mar 2001 B1
6200266 Shokrollahi et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210335 Miller Apr 2001 B1
6213958 Winder Apr 2001 B1
6221019 Kantorovich Apr 2001 B1
6231511 Bae May 2001 B1
6238342 Feleppa et al. May 2001 B1
6246901 Benaron Jun 2001 B1
6251073 Imran et al. Jun 2001 B1
6264609 Herrington et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266551 Osadchy et al. Jul 2001 B1
6278949 Alam Aug 2001 B1
6289230 Chaiken et al. Sep 2001 B1
6299580 Asafusa Oct 2001 B1
6304684 Niczyporuk et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309356 Ustuner et al. Oct 2001 B1
6324453 Breed et al. Nov 2001 B1
6345539 Rawes et al. Feb 2002 B1
6361500 Masters Mar 2002 B1
6363033 Cole et al. Mar 2002 B1
6370480 Gupta et al. Apr 2002 B1
6374185 Taner et al. Apr 2002 B1
6394955 Perlitz May 2002 B1
6423002 Hossack Jul 2002 B1
6436046 Napolitano et al. Aug 2002 B1
6449821 Sudol et al. Sep 2002 B1
6450965 Williams et al. Sep 2002 B2
6468216 Powers et al. Oct 2002 B1
6471650 Powers et al. Oct 2002 B2
6475150 Haddad Nov 2002 B2
6480790 Calvert et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487502 Taner Nov 2002 B1
6499536 Ellingsen Dec 2002 B1
6508768 Hall et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508770 Cai Jan 2003 B1
6517484 Wilk et al. Feb 2003 B1
6526163 Halmann et al. Feb 2003 B1
6543272 Vitek Apr 2003 B1
6547732 Jago Apr 2003 B2
6551246 Ustuner et al. Apr 2003 B1
6565510 Haider May 2003 B1
6585647 Winder Jul 2003 B1
6604421 Li Aug 2003 B1
6614560 Silverbrook Sep 2003 B1
6620101 Azzam et al. Sep 2003 B2
6652461 Levkovitz Nov 2003 B1
6668654 Dubois et al. Dec 2003 B2
6672165 Rather et al. Jan 2004 B2
6681185 Young et al. Jan 2004 B1
6690816 Aylward et al. Feb 2004 B2
6692450 Coleman Feb 2004 B1
6695778 Golland et al. Feb 2004 B2
6702745 Smythe Mar 2004 B1
6719693 Richard Apr 2004 B2
6728567 Rather et al. Apr 2004 B2
6752762 DeJong et al. Jun 2004 B1
6755787 Hossack et al. Jun 2004 B2
6780152 Ustuner et al. Aug 2004 B2
6790182 Eck et al. Sep 2004 B2
6837853 Marian Jan 2005 B2
6843770 Sumanaweera Jan 2005 B2
6847737 Kouri et al. Jan 2005 B1
6854332 Alleyne Feb 2005 B2
6865140 Thomenius et al. Mar 2005 B2
6932767 Landry et al. Aug 2005 B2
7033320 Von Behren et al. Apr 2006 B2
7087023 Daft et al. Aug 2006 B2
7104956 Christopher Sep 2006 B1
7217243 Takeuchi May 2007 B2
7221867 Silverbrook May 2007 B2
7231072 Yamano et al. Jun 2007 B2
7269299 Schroeder Sep 2007 B2
7283652 Mendonca et al. Oct 2007 B2
7285094 Nohara et al. Oct 2007 B2
7293462 Lee et al. Nov 2007 B2
7313053 Wodnicki Dec 2007 B2
7366704 Reading et al. Apr 2008 B2
7402136 Hossack et al. Jul 2008 B2
7410469 Talish et al. Aug 2008 B1
7415880 Renzel Aug 2008 B2
7443765 Thomenius et al. Oct 2008 B2
7444875 Wu et al. Nov 2008 B1
7447535 Lavi Nov 2008 B2
7448998 Robinson Nov 2008 B2
7466848 Metaxas et al. Dec 2008 B2
7469096 Silverbrook Dec 2008 B2
7474778 Shinomura et al. Jan 2009 B2
7481577 Ramamurthy et al. Jan 2009 B2
7491171 Barthe et al. Feb 2009 B2
7497828 Wilk et al. Mar 2009 B1
7497830 Li Mar 2009 B2
7510529 Chou et al. Mar 2009 B2
7514851 Wilser et al. Apr 2009 B2
7549962 Dreschel et al. Jun 2009 B2
7574026 Rasche et al. Aug 2009 B2
7625343 Cao et al. Dec 2009 B2
7637869 Sudol Dec 2009 B2
7668583 Fegert et al. Feb 2010 B2
7674228 Williams et al. Mar 2010 B2
7682311 Simopoulos et al. Mar 2010 B2
7699776 Walker et al. Apr 2010 B2
7722541 Cai May 2010 B2
7744532 Ustuner et al. Jun 2010 B2
7750311 Daghighian Jul 2010 B2
7785260 Umemura et al. Aug 2010 B2
7787680 Ahn et al. Aug 2010 B2
7806828 Stringer Oct 2010 B2
7819810 Stringer et al. Oct 2010 B2
7822250 Yao et al. Oct 2010 B2
7824337 Abe et al. Nov 2010 B2
7833163 Cai Nov 2010 B2
7837624 Hossack et al. Nov 2010 B1
7846097 Jones et al. Dec 2010 B2
7850613 Stribling Dec 2010 B2
7862508 Davies et al. Jan 2011 B2
7876945 Lötjönen Jan 2011 B2
7887486 Ustuner et al. Feb 2011 B2
7901358 Mehi et al. Mar 2011 B2
7919906 Cerofolini Apr 2011 B2
7926350 Kröning et al. Apr 2011 B2
7927280 Davidsen Apr 2011 B2
7972271 Johnson et al. Jul 2011 B2
7984637 Ao et al. Jul 2011 B2
7984651 Randall et al. Jul 2011 B2
8002705 Napolitano et al. Aug 2011 B1
8007439 Specht Aug 2011 B2
8057392 Hossack et al. Nov 2011 B2
8057393 Yao et al. Nov 2011 B2
8079263 Randall et al. Dec 2011 B2
8079956 Azuma et al. Dec 2011 B2
8088067 Vortman et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088068 Yao et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088071 Hwang et al. Jan 2012 B2
8105239 Specht Jan 2012 B2
8135190 Bae et al. Mar 2012 B2
8157737 Zhang et al. Apr 2012 B2
8182427 Wu et al. May 2012 B2
8202219 Luo et al. Jun 2012 B2
20020035864 Paltieli et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020087071 Schmitz et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020111568 Bukshpan Aug 2002 A1
20020138003 Bukshpan Sep 2002 A1
20020161299 Prater et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030013962 Bjaerum et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028111 Vaezy et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040669 Grass et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030228053 Li et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040054283 Corey et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040068184 Trahey et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040100163 Baumgartner et al. May 2004 A1
20040111028 Abe et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122313 Moore et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122322 Moore et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040127793 Mendlein et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138565 Trucco Jul 2004 A1
20040144176 Yoden Jul 2004 A1
20040236217 Cerwin et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040236223 Barnes et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050004449 Mitschke et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050053305 Li et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050054910 Tremblay et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050090743 Kawashima et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050090745 Steen Apr 2005 A1
20050111846 Steinbacher et al. May 2005 A1
20050113689 Gritzky May 2005 A1
20050113694 Haugen et al. May 2005 A1
20050124883 Hunt Jun 2005 A1
20050131300 Bakircioglu et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050147297 McLaughlin et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165312 Knowles et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050203404 Freiburger Sep 2005 A1
20050215883 Hundley et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050240125 Makin et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050252295 Fink et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050281447 Moreau-Gobard et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288588 Weber et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060062447 Rinck et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074313 Slayton et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060074315 Liang et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060074320 Yoo et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079759 Vaillant et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079778 Mo et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079782 Beach et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060094962 Clark May 2006 A1
20060111634 Wu May 2006 A1
20060122506 Davies et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060173327 Kim Aug 2006 A1
20060262291 Hess et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060270934 Savord et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070016022 Blalock et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016044 Blalock et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070036414 Georgescu et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070055155 Owen et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070078345 Mo et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088213 Poland Apr 2007 A1
20070138157 Dane et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070161898 Hao et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070161904 Urbano Jul 2007 A1
20070167752 Proulx et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167824 Lee et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070232914 Chen et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070238985 Smith et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070242567 Daft et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080110261 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080110263 Klessel et al. May 2008 A1
20080112265 Urbano et al. May 2008 A1
20080114241 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080114245 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080114246 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080114247 Urbano et al. May 2008 A1
20080114248 Urbano et al. May 2008 A1
20080114249 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080114250 Urbano et al. May 2008 A1
20080114251 Weymer et al. May 2008 A1
20080114252 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080114253 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080114255 Schwartz et al. May 2008 A1
20080125659 Wilser et al. May 2008 A1
20080181479 Yang et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183075 Govari et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080188747 Randall et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080188750 Randall et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080194957 Hoctor et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080194958 Lee et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080194959 Wang et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080208061 Halmann Aug 2008 A1
20080242996 Hall et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080249408 Palmeri et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080255452 Entrekin Oct 2008 A1
20080269604 Boctor et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269613 Summers et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080275344 Glide-Hurst et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080285819 Konofagou et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080287787 Sauer et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294045 Ellington et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294050 Shinomura et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294052 Wilser et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080306382 Guracar et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080306386 Baba et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080319317 Kamiyama et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090010459 Garbini et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090012393 Choi Jan 2009 A1
20090016163 Freeman et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090018445 Schers et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024039 Wang et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090036780 Abraham Feb 2009 A1
20090043206 Towfiq et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090048519 Hossack et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090069681 Lundberg et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090069686 Daft et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090069692 Cooley et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090099483 Rybyanets Apr 2009 A1
20090112095 Daigle Apr 2009 A1
20090131797 Jeong et al. May 2009 A1
20090143680 Yao et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090148012 Altmann et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090150094 Van Velsor et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090182233 Wodnicki Jul 2009 A1
20090182237 Angelsen et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198134 Hashimoto et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090203997 Ustuner Aug 2009 A1
20090208080 Grau et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090259128 Stribling Oct 2009 A1
20090264760 Lazebnik et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090306510 Hashiba et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326379 Daigle et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100010354 Skerl et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100016725 Thiele Jan 2010 A1
20100063397 Wagner Mar 2010 A1
20100063399 Walker et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069751 Hazard et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069756 Ogasawara et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100106431 Baba et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100109481 Buccafusca May 2010 A1
20100121193 Fukukita et al. May 2010 A1
20100121196 Hwang et al. May 2010 A1
20100130855 Lundberg et al. May 2010 A1
20100168566 Bercoff et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100168578 Garson, Jr. et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100174194 Chiang et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100191110 Insana et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100217124 Cooley Aug 2010 A1
20100228126 Emery et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100240994 Zheng Sep 2010 A1
20100249570 Carson et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100249596 Magee Sep 2010 A1
20100256488 Kim et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100262013 Smith et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100266176 Masumoto et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100268503 Specht et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100286525 Osumi Nov 2010 A1
20100286527 Cannon et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100310143 Rao et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100324418 El-Aklouk et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100324423 El-Aklouk et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100329521 Beymer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110005322 Ustuner Jan 2011 A1
20110016977 Guracar Jan 2011 A1
20110021920 Shafir et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110021923 Daft et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110033098 Richter et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110044133 Tokita Feb 2011 A1
20110066030 Yao Mar 2011 A1
20110098565 Masuzawa Apr 2011 A1
20110112400 Emery et al. May 2011 A1
20110112404 Gourevitch May 2011 A1
20110125017 Ramamurthy et al. May 2011 A1
20110178400 Specht et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110201933 Specht et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110270088 Shiina Nov 2011 A1
20110301470 Sato et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110306885 Specht Dec 2011 A1
20110306886 Daft et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110319764 Okada et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120035482 Kim et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120036934 Kröning et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120057428 Specht et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120085173 Papadopoulos et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120101378 Lee Apr 2012 A1
20120114210 Kim et al. May 2012 A1
20120121150 Murashita May 2012 A1
20120137778 Kitazawa et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120141002 Urbano et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120165670 Shi et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120179044 Chiang et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120226201 Clark et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120277585 Koenig et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130035595 Specht Feb 2013 A1
20130070062 Fouras et al. Mar 2013 A1
20140086014 Kobayashi Mar 2014 A1
20140243673 Anand et al. Aug 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (97)
Number Date Country
1781460 Jun 2006 CN
101116622 Feb 2008 CN
101190134 Jun 2008 CN
101453955 Jun 2009 CN
101843501 Sep 2010 CN
102018533 Apr 2011 CN
102123668 Jul 2011 CN
1949856 Jul 2008 EP
2058796 May 2009 EP
2101191 Sep 2009 EP
2182352 May 2010 EP
2187813 May 2010 EP
2198785 Jun 2010 EP
1757955 Nov 2010 EP
2325672 May 2011 EP
2356941 Aug 2011 EP
1979739 Oct 2011 EP
2385391 Nov 2011 EP
2294400 Feb 2012 EP
2453256 May 2012 EP
1840594 Jun 2012 EP
1850743 Dec 2012 EP
2851662 Aug 2004 FR
S49-11189 Jan 1974 JP
S54-44375 Apr 1979 JP
S55-103839 Aug 1980 JP
57-31848 Feb 1982 JP
59-101143 Jun 1984 JP
S59-174151 Oct 1984 JP
S60-13109 Jan 1985 JP
S60-68836 Apr 1985 JP
2-501431 May 1990 JP
03015455 Jan 1991 JP
03126443 May 1991 JP
04017842 Jan 1992 JP
4-67856 Mar 1992 JP
05-042138 Feb 1993 JP
6-125908 May 1994 JP
7-051266 Feb 1995 JP
07204201 Aug 1995 JP
08154930 Jun 1996 JP
08-252253 Oct 1996 JP
9-103429 Apr 1997 JP
9-201361 Aug 1997 JP
10-216128 Aug 1998 JP
11-089833 Apr 1999 JP
11-239578 Sep 1999 JP
2001-507794 Jun 2001 JP
2001-245884 Sep 2001 JP
2002-209894 Jul 2002 JP
2002-253548 Sep 2002 JP
2002-253549 Sep 2002 JP
2004-167092 Jun 2004 JP
2004-215987 Aug 2004 JP
2004-337457 Dec 2004 JP
2004-351214 Dec 2004 JP
2005152187 Jun 2005 JP
2005-523792 Aug 2005 JP
2005-526539 Sep 2005 JP
2006-61203 Mar 2006 JP
2006-122657 May 2006 JP
2006130313 May 2006 JP
2007-325937 Dec 2007 JP
2008-122209 May 2008 JP
2008-513763 May 2008 JP
2008132342 Jun 2008 JP
2008522642 Jul 2008 JP
2008-259541 Oct 2008 JP
2008279274 Nov 2008 JP
2009240667 Oct 2009 JP
20105375 Jan 2010 JP
2010124842 Jun 2010 JP
2010526626 Aug 2010 JP
100715132 Apr 2007 KR
1020090103408 Oct 2009 KR
WO 9218054 Oct 1992 WO
WO 9800719 Jan 1998 WO
WO0164109 Sep 2001 WO
WO02084594 Oct 2002 WO
WO2005009245 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2006114735 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2007127147 Nov 2007 WO
WO2009060182 May 2009 WO
WO 2010017445 Feb 2010 WO
WO 2010095094 Aug 2010 WO
WO2010139519 Dec 2010 WO
WO2011004661 Jan 2011 WO
WO2011057252 May 2011 WO
WO2011064688 Jun 2011 WO
WO2011100697 Aug 2011 WO
WO2011123529 Oct 2011 WO
WO2012028896 Mar 2012 WO
WO2012049124 Apr 2012 WO
WO2012049612 Apr 2012 WO
WO2012078639 Jun 2012 WO
WO2012091280 Jul 2012 WO
WO2012160541 Nov 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (57)
Entry
Sapia et al.; Deconvolution of ultrasonic waveforms using an adaptive wiener filter; Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation; vol. 13A; Plenum Press; pp. 855-862; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filed and any foreign priority date) 1994.
Cristianini et al.; An Introduction to Support Vector Machines; Cambridge University Press; pp. 93-111; Mar. 2000.
Du et al.; User parameter free approaches to multistatic adaptive ultrasound imaging; 5th IEEE International Symposium; pp. 1287-1290, May 2008.
Feigenbaum, Harvey, M.D.; Echocardiography; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia; 5th Ed.; pp. 428, 484; Feb. 1994.
Haykin, Simon; Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation (2nd Ed.); Prentice Hall; pp. 156-187; Jul. 16, 1998.
Ledesma-Carbayo et al.; Spatio-temporal nonrigid registration for ultrasound cardiac motion estimation; IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging; vol. 24; No. 9; Sep. 2005.
Leotta et al.; Quantitative three-dimensional echocardiography by rapid imaging . . . ; J American Society of Echocardiography; vol. 10; No. 8; ppl 830-839; Oct. 1997.
Morrison et al.; A probabilistic neural network based image segmentation network for magnetic resonance images; Proc. Conf. Neural Networks; Baltimore, MD; vol. 3; pp. 60-65; Jun. 1992.
Nadkarni et al.; Cardiac motion synchronization for 3D cardiac ultrasound imaging; Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Western Ontario; Jun. 2002.
Press et al.; Cubic spline interpolation; §3.3 in “Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing”, 2nd Ed.; Cambridge, England; Cambridge University Press; pp. 107-110; Sep. 1992.
Sakas et al.; Preprocessing and volume rendering of 3D ultrasonic data; IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications; pp. 47-54, Jul. 1995.
Sapia et al.; Ultrasound image deconvolution using adaptive inverse filtering; 12 IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, CBMS, pp. 248-253; Jun. 1999.
Sapia, Mark Angelo; Multi-dimensional deconvolution of optical microscope and ultrasound imaging using adaptive least-mean-square (LMS) inverse filtering; Ph.D. Dissertation; University of Connecticut; Jan. 2000.
Smith et al.; High-speed ultrasound volumetric imaging system. 1. Transducer design and beam steering; IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr.; vol. 38; pp. 100-108; Mar. 1991.
Specht et al.; Deconvolution techniques for digital longitudinal tomography; SPIE; vol. 454; presented at Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine XII; pp. 319-325; Jun. 1984.
Specht et al.; Experience with adaptive PNN and adaptive GRNN; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. on Neural Networks; vol. 2; pp. 1203-1208; Orlando, FL; Jun. 1994.
Specht, D.F.; A general regression neural network; IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks; vol. 2.; No. 6; Nov. 1991.
Specht, D.F.; Blind deconvolution of motion blur using LMS inverse filtering; Lockheed Independent Research (unpublished); Jun. 23, 1975.
Specht, D.F.; Enhancements to probabilistic neural networks; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. on Neural Networks; Baltimore, MD; Jun. 1992.
Specht, D.F.; GRNN with double clustering; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. Neural Networks; Vancouver, Canada; Jul. 16-21, 2006.
Specht, D.F.; Probabilistic neural networks; Pergamon Press; Neural Networks; vol. 3; pp. 109-118; Feb. 1990.
Von Ramm et al.; High-speed ultrasound volumetric imaging-System. 2. Parallel processing and image display; IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr.; vol. 38; pp. 109-115; Mar. 1991.
Wells, P.N.T.; Biomedical ultrasonics; Academic Press; London, New York, San Francisco; pp. 124-125; Mar. 1977.
Widrow et al.; Adaptive signal processing; Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ; pp. 99-116; Mar. 1985.
Specht, Donald F.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/333,611 entitled “Method and Apparatus to Visualize the Coronary Arteries Using Ultrasound,” filed Dec. 21, 2011.
Smith et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,105 entitled “Concave Ultrasound Transducers and 3D Arrays,” filed Oct. 12, 2011.
Kramb et al,.; Considerations for using phased array ultrasonics in a fully automated inspection system. Review of Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 23, ed. D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, pp. 817-825, (month unavailable) 2004.
Specht et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/690,989 entitled “Motion Detection Using Ping-Based and Multiple Aperture Doppler Ultrasound,” filed Nov. 30, 2012.
Brewer et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,346 entitled “M-Mode Ultrasound Imaging of Arbitrary Paths,” filed Dec. 28, 2012.
Specht et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/773,340 entitled “Determining Material Stiffness Using Multiple Aperture Ultrasound,” filed Feb. 21, 2013.
Hendee et al.; Medical Imaging Physics; Wiley-Liss, Inc. 4th Edition; Chap. 19-22; pp. 303-353; © 2002 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filed and any foreign priority date).
Wikipedia; Point cloud; 2 pages; Nov. 24, 2014; retrieved from the internet (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Point—cloud&oldid=472583138).
Li et al.; An efficient speckle tracking algorithm for ultrasonic imaging; 24; pp. 215-228; Oct. 1, 2002.
UCLA Academic Technology; SPSS learning module: How can I analyze a subset of my data; 6 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/spss/modules/subset—analyze.htm) Nov. 26, 2001.
Wikipedia; Curve fitting; 5 pages; retrieved from the internet (http: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curve—fitting) Dec. 19, 2010.
Wikipedia; Speed of sound; 17 pages; retrieved from the internet (http: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed—of—sound) Feb. 15, 2011.
Abeysekera et al.; Alignment and calibration of dual ultrasound transducers using a wedge phantom; Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; 37(2); pp. 271-279; Feb. 2011.
Carson et al.; Measurement of photoacoustic transducer position by robotic source placement and nonlinear parameter estimation; Biomedical Optics (BiOS); International Society for Optics and Photonics (9th Conf. on Biomedical Thermoacoustics, Optoacoustics, and Acousto-optics; vol. 6856; 9 pages; Feb. 28, 2008.
Chen et al.; Maximum-likelihood source localization and unknown sensor location estimation for wideband signals in the near-field; IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing; 50(8); pp. 1843-1854; Aug. 2002.
Chen et al.; Source localization and tracking of a wideband source using a randomly distributed beamforming sensor array; International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications; 16(3); pp. 259-272; Fall 2002.
Fernandez et al.; High resolution ultrasound beamforming using synthetic and adaptive imaging techniques; Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging; Washington, D.C.; pp. 433-436; Jul. 7-10, 2002.
Gazor et al.; Wideband multi-source beamforming with array location calibration and direction finding; Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP-95; Detroit, MI; vol. 3 IEEE; pp. 1904-1907; May 9-12, 1995.
Heikkila et al.; A four-step camera calibration procedure with implicit image correction; Proceedings IEEE Computer Scociety Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; San Juan; pp. 1106-1112; Jun. 17-19, 1997.
Hsu et al.; Real-time freehand 3D ultrasound calibration; CUED/F-INFENG/TR 565; Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; 14 pages; Sep. 2006.
Khamene et al.; A novel phantom-less spatial and temporal ultrasound calibration method; Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI (Proceedings 8th Int. Conf.); Springer Berlin Heidelberg; Palm Springs, CA; pp. 65-72; Oct. 26-29, 2005.
Slavine et al.; Construction, calibration and evaluation of a tissue phantom with reproducible optical properties for investigations in light emission tomography; Engineering in Medicine and Biology Workshop; Dallas, TX; IEEE pp. 122-125; Nov. 11-12, 2007.
Urban et al; Implementation of vibro-acoustography on a clinical ultrasound system; IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control; 58(6); pp. 1169-1181; Jun. 2011 (Author Manuscript).
Urban et al; Implementation of vibro-acoustography on a clinical ultrasound system; IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS); pp. 326-329; Oct. 14, 2010.
Wang et al.; Photoacoustic tomography of biological tissues with high cross-section resolution: reconstruction and experiment; Medical Physics; 29(12); pp. 2799-2805; Dec. 2002.
Yang et al.; Time-of-arrival calibration for improving the microwave breast cancer imaging; 2011 IEEE Topical Conf. on Biomedical Wireless Technologies, Networks, and sensing Systems (BioWireleSS); Phoenix, AZ; pp. 67-70; Jan. 16-19, 2011.
Opretzka et al.; A high-frequency ultrasound imaging system combining limited-angle spatial compounding and model-based synthetic aperture focusing; IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE, US; 58(7); pp. 1355-1365; Jul. 2, 2011.
Jeffs; Beamforming: a brief introduction; Brigham Young University; 14 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://ens.ewi.tudelft.nl/Education/courses/et4235/Beamforming.pdf); Oct. 2004.
Arigovindan et al.; Full motion and flow field recovery from echo doppler data; IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging; 26(1); pp. 31-45; Jan. 2007.
Capineri et al.; A doppler system for dynamic vector velocity maps; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology; 28(2); pp. 237-248; Feb. 28, 2002.
Dunmire et al.; A brief history of vector doppler; Medical Imaging 2001; International Society for Optics and Photonics; pp. 200-214; May 30, 2001.
Saad et al.; Computer vision approach for ultrasound doppler angle estimation; Journal of Digital Imaging; 22(6); pp. 681-688; Dec. 1, 2009.
Zang et al.; A high-frequency high frame rate duplex ultrasound linear array imaging system for small animal imaging; IEEE transactions on ultrasound, ferroelectrics, and frequency control; 57(7); pp. 1548-1567; Jul. 2010.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120095347 A1 Apr 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61392841 Oct 2010 US