The present invention relates to antenna design for radio communication in general, and, more particularly, to antenna design for Radio-Frequency IDentification (RFID) systems.
Radio communication systems have existed for over a century. During this period of time, antenna designers have generated a wide variety of antenna designs with the goal of achieving good performance in a variety of operating conditions.
Generally, the goal of the antenna designer when designing, for example, a receiving antenna, is to maximize power transfer between an electromagnetic signal incident on the antenna, and the resulting electrical signal generated by the antenna. The higher the power transfer, the higher the received signal-to-noise ratio, which usually results in better receiver performance.
Also, traditionally, radio receivers have comprised electronic circuitry and a separate receiving antenna interconnected to one another through a suitable cable connection. In such systems, antenna designers must consider the distorting influence of the cable connection and the electronic circuitry on the electromagnetic behavior of the antenna.
More recently, with the advent of small radio systems based on integrated circuit technology, it has become possible to make so-called Radio-Frequency IDentification (RFID) systems, wherein an entire radio receiver is housed in a package much smaller than the receiving antenna. In such systems, the almost-complete elimination of the distorting influence of the cable connection and the electronic circuitry enables novel antenna designs.
So-called passive RFID receivers can be much smaller than the receiving antenna in part because they do not require a power supply. Power to operate the receiver is derived from the received radio signal itself. The signal generated by the receiving antenna is rectified by one or more diodes to yield a direct-current (DC) voltage that is used to power the receiver.
Ideal diodes are perfect conductors when a forward voltage is applied and are perfect insulators when a reverse voltage is applied. Real diodes only approximate this behavior. In particular, real diodes require a minimum forward voltage before becoming good conductors. Accordingly, the signal generated by the receiving antenna, must have a voltage higher than the minimum required by the diodes, before a DC voltage becomes available to power the RFID receiver.
So, in contrast with traditional antenna design, the goal for the design of passive-RFID-receiver antennas is to maximize not the received-signal power, but rather the received-signal voltage.
It is well known in the art that antennas are reciprocal devices, meaning that an antenna that is used as a transmitting antenna can also be used as a receiving antenna, and vice versa. Furthermore, there is a one-to-one correspondence between the behavior of an antenna used as a receiving antenna and the behavior of the same antenna used as a transmitting antenna. This property of antennas is known in the art as “reciprocity.”
An antenna used as a transmitting antenna accepts an electrical signal applied at an input port and produces a transmitted electromagnetic signal that propagates through three-dimensional space. It is well known in the art how to represent such a transmitted electromagnetic signal as a vector in a vector space, for example, as a superposition of spherical harmonics. The behavior of a transmitting antenna at a given frequency can be fully characterized by reporting, for example, the spherical-harmonic components of the transmitted electromagnetic signal that it generates in response to a test electrical signal at that frequency that is applied to the antenna's input port.
Such a characterization can be used to derive, unambiguously, the behavior of the same antenna when it is used as a receiving antenna. In this case, the input port becomes an output port that generates an output electrical signal in response to an incident electromagnetic signal propagating through three-dimensional space. The incident electromagnetic signal can be specified by, for example, by specifying its spherical-harmonic components. The resulting electrical signal can then be derived through a scalar product with the spherical-harmonic components of the transmitted electromagnetic signal at the same frequency, as is well known in the art.
A consequence of reciprocity is that an antenna can be fully characterized in terms of its properties as either a transmitting antenna or as a receiving antenna. A full characterization of an antenna when used in one mode (transmitting or receiving) uniquely and unambiguously defines the properties of the antenna when used in the other mode.
For example, in order to understand or measure the radiation pattern of an antenna it is frequently easier to feed an electric signal into the antenna and then observe the electromagnetic field generated by the antenna. This task can be performed experimentally or computationally. The radiation pattern of the antenna that is obtained through this method also applies when the antenna is used as a receiving antenna. Hereinafter, antennas will be interchangeably referred to as receiving or transmitting, and their properties will be discussed as they apply to either transmission or reception, as convenient to achieve clarity. It will be clear to those skilled in the art how to apply what is said about an antenna used in one mode (receiving or transmitting) to the same antenna used in the other mode.
In principle, it is possible to make an antenna that radiates efficiently at many frequencies, without exhibiting a band of resonance. In practice, it is difficult to make such antennas, and resonant structures (hereinafter also referred to as “resonators”) are commonly used to make antennas that radiate efficiently.
The frequency of resonance of resonant structure 200 depends on its length. The structure can be modeled as a twin-lead transmission line 210 with a short at one end (i.e., the end opposite input-output port 220). The structure is resonant at a frequency for which the length of the transmission line is about one quarter of a wavelength. The range of frequencies near the resonant frequency over which the resonant structure exhibits acceptably good performance is known as the “band of resonance.”
Resonant structure 200 exhibits resonance in a manner similar to monopole antenna 100. Near the resonant frequency, the electromagnetic fields generated by the voltages and currents on wire 240 become stronger, and a larger fraction of the power of an electrical signal applied to input-output port 220 is radiated as an electromagnetic signal. Accordingly, resonant structures that exhibit this behavior are referred to as “electromagnetically-resonant.”
Although folded-dipole antenna 300 can be modeled as being composed of two instances of resonant structure 200 connected in series, the signal that it generates when used as a receiving antenna is not the sum of the signals that each instance of resonant structure 200 would generate if used by itself because of the mutual coupling between the two instances of resonant structure 200.
Conductive sheets 410-1 and 410-2, together with electrical connection 420, form resonant structure 450. Load element 430 receives the signal generated by resonant structure 450 through connection points 440-1 and 440-2. When used to implement an RFID tag, load element 430 is small relatively to the size of conductive sheets 410-1 and 410-2.
To implement an RFID tag, load element 430 acts as both a receiver and a transmitter. In particular, in a passive RFID tag, transmission is accomplished through a technique known as “modulated backscatter” wherein load element 430 controls the impedance that it presents to the received signal. Modulated backscatter is based on the fact that, in any radio receiver, a portion of the electromagnetic signal incident on the receiving antenna is reflected. The amplitude and phase of the reflected signal depend on the impedance connected to the antenna port, so that load element 430 modulates the reflected signal by controlling its own impedance.
Embodiments of the present invention comprise a pair of resonant structures implemented as resonant cavities. Cavities are realized by interconnecting sheets of conductive material such as, for example, metal foil. Two cavities are combined to achieve an antenna structure that, when used as a receiving antenna, has a source impedance that is higher than prior-art antennas. For a given received signal strength, the higher source impedance yields a higher voltage at the antenna output port, resulting in a longer distance of operation for RFID tags based on the present invention.
An embodiment of the present invention comprises a ribbon of conductive material, such as metal foil, wherein the two ends of the ribbon are folded over the middle part of the ribbon. Between each folded end of the ribbon and the middle part of the ribbon there is a layer of supporting material that supports the ribbon and maintains the folded end of the ribbon at a fixed distance from the middle part of the ribbon. The volume of space between one end of the ribbon and the middle part of the ribbon, which is occupied by the supporting material, forms one electromagnetically-resonant cavity. The supporting material also acts as dielectric.
A load element is connected between the two folded ends of the ribbon to make an RFID tag. The folded ribbon is the tag's antenna; it has a higher impedance than prior-art antennas for RFID tags, with the result that a higher voltage is generated across the load element.
For situations where an RFID tag is used near a large metal object, embodiments of the present invention comprise an additional sheet of conductive material, referred to as a “reflector.” For embodiments implemented as a folded ribbon, the reflector sheet is placed parallel to the middle part of the ribbon, on the side opposite the folded ends. A layer of supporting material is between the reflector and the middle part of the ribbon and serves to maintain a fixed distance between them. The presence of the reflector reduces the disruption of tag performance caused by large metal objects in the vicinity of the tag.
Each of the two folded ends 540-1 and 540-2 forms a resonant cavity together with the middle part 550 of conductive ribbon 510. The two cavities are electrically connected together via the shared middle part 550 of conductive ribbon 510. Compared to prior-art folded-dipole antenna 300, dual-cavity antenna with load element 500 has a higher impedance. In traditional radio systems, the higher impedance is not an advantage—indeed, in many traditional radio systems it is a disadvantage—but the higher impedance is advantageous in passive RFID tags. The use of a conductive ribbon to form two cavities, instead of using two resonant structures formed by a wire, is a salient difference between folded-dipole antenna 300 and dual-cavity antenna with load element 500; this difference gives the latter antenna the advantageous higher impedance. The other illustrative embodiment of the present invention set forth in this disclosure also provide the advantage of a higher impedance.
Although the two cavities formed by the two folded ends 540-1 and 540-2 are depicted in
Although connection points 540-1 and 540-2 are depicted in
Although connection points 540-1 and 540-2 are depicted in
Although the portions of conductive ribbon 510 wherein the folds occur are depicted as semicircular in shape, it will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention with folds having different shapes. For example, and without limitation,
For the purpose of visual clarity,
Although, in
Although values for distance 650 and distance 660 are not explicitly specified in
(i) the length of the ribbon, and
(ii) the width of the ribbon.
Also, for example and without limitation, the values for distance 650 and distance 660 might within the range of 3 mm to 10 mm, inclusive; the length of the ribbon might be within the range of 200 mm and 300 mm, inclusive; and the width of the ribbon might be no less than 6 mm.
Although
Although conductive reflector sheet 720 is depicted as a thin sheet, as might be implemented with metal foil, that extends slightly beyond the outline of conductive ribbon 710, it will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention wherein conductive reflector sheet 720 is realized differently. For example and without limitation, conductive reflector sheet can be:
Electrical connections 820-1 and 820-2 perform the same functions as the curved portions of conductive ribbon 510 in the first illustrative embodiment of the present invention. Conductive sheet 810-1 performs the same function as middle part of ribbon 550 in the first illustrative embodiment of the present invention. Conductive sheets 810-2 and 810-3 performs the same functions as folded ends of ribbon 540-1 and 540-2 in the first illustrative embodiment of the present invention. In particular, conductive sheets 810-2 and 810-3 form two resonant cavities, respectively, together with conductive sheet 810-1.
Although the combination of conductive sheets 810-1, 810-2, and 810-3, and electrical connections 820-1 and 820-2 can be realized by folding a ribbon of conductive material similar to conductive ribbon 510 with sharp bends around dielectric material 830, it will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention that are realized in a different manner. For example and without limitation, electrical connections 820-1 and 820-2 can be realized as:
Although conductive sheets and conductive ribbons are depicted in the figures of this disclosure as solid sheets of electrically conductive material such as, for example, metal foil, it will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention wherein the conductive sheets and conductive ribbons are realized differently. For example, and without limitation, a conductive sheets or a conductive ribbon can:
Although dielectric material 830 is shown in
Many different dielectric materials are known in the art for making resonant structures. For example, and without limitation, dielectric material 830 can be acetate, ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) of various densities, polyphenylsulphone, polyethersulfone, polysulfone, PETG (Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol), polycarbonate, teflon, polystyrene, difunctional epoxy resin (FR4), epoxy glass, or polyethylene.
Although values for the dimensions of conductive sheets 810-1, 810-2, and 810-3 and for the distances between them are not explicitly specified in
(i) the square root of the area of sheet 810-1,
(ii) the square root of the area of sheet 810-2, and
(iii) the square root of the area of sheet 810-3.
Also, sheets 810-1, 810-2, and 810-3 might be arranged such that the distance between the plane of sheet 810-1 and the plane of sheet 810-3 is less than:
(i) the square root of the area of sheet 810-1,
(ii) the square root of the area of sheet 810-2, and
(iii) the square root of the area of sheet 810-3.
Conductive sheets 810-1, 810-2, and 810-3, electrical connections 820-1 and 820-2 are identical to conductive sheets 810-1, 810-2, and 810-3, electrical connections 820-1 and 820-2 in
In this fifth illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the volume of space inside the two cavities is occupied by two layers of different dielectric materials, 930-1 and 930-2. The volume of space between conductive reflector 720 and conductive sheet 810-1 is occupied by dielectric material 930-3. It will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention wherein the volumes of space described in this paragraph are occupied by one or more dielectric materials arranged in one or more layers or in other geometric arrangements.
Conductive sheets 810-1, 810-2, and 810-3, electrical connections 820-1 and 820-2 and dielectric material 830 are identical to conductive sheets 810-1, 810-2, and 810-3, electrical connections 820-1 and 820-2 and dielectric material 830 in
The salient difference between this illustrative embodiment and the previous illustrative embodiments is the way in which load element 520 is connected to conductive sheets 810-2 and 810-3. It is well known in the art how to make a delay element using a so-called “serpentine” structure, sometimes also referred-to as a “meandering” structure. Such a structure is depicted in
Although this disclosure sets forth embodiments of the present invention as applicable for implementing RFID systems, it will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention that are applicable to other types of radio-communication systems. For example, and without limitation, a radio receiver or transmitter characterized by a high input or output impedance can advantageously utilize an antenna in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
It is to be understood that this disclosure teaches just one or more examples of one or more illustrative embodiments, and that many variations of the invention can easily be devised by those skilled in the art after reading this disclosure, and that the scope of the present invention is to be determined by the following claims.
The underlying concepts, but not necessarily the language, of the following cases are incorporated by reference: (1) U.S. provisional application No. 61/207,467; and (2) U.S. provisional application No. 61/273,814. If there are any contradictions or inconsistencies in language between this application and one or more of the cases that have been incorporated by reference that might affect the interpretation of the claims in this case, the claims in this case should be interpreted to be consistent with the language in this case. This case claims benefit of the following provisional applications: (1) U.S. provisional application No. 61/207,467; and (2) U.S. provisional application No. 61/273,814. This case is a Continuation-in-Part and claims priority of co-pending U.S. case No. 12/535,768 titled “Multiple-Resonator Antenna” and filed on Aug. 5, 2009.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4128840 | Tucker | Dec 1978 | A |
4259670 | Schiavone | Mar 1981 | A |
4356492 | Kaloi | Oct 1982 | A |
4704581 | Clark | Nov 1987 | A |
4783661 | Smith | Nov 1988 | A |
5283589 | Blevins | Feb 1994 | A |
5341148 | Walter et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5471180 | Brommer et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5995048 | Smithgall et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6342864 | Muramoto et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6552693 | Leisten | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6975276 | Brown | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7019711 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7034752 | Sekiguchi et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7088290 | Ohno et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7173577 | Brown et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7388550 | McLean | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7471247 | Saily et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7589678 | Perunka et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7619570 | Sarehraz et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
20020057222 | McKinzie, III et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020167282 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030058178 | Von Alpen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030169204 | Saito | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030201942 | Poilasne et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210190 | Lai | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040021605 | Kouam et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040070541 | Andersson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050057415 | Rawnick et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060181475 | Kwon et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070109201 | Licul et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070210976 | Luk et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070290941 | Brown et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080122631 | Kodukula et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080191950 | Chang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080284656 | Petropoulos | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100013718 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100207840 | Carr | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100207841 | Carr | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004093249 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Young, Lee W., “PCT Application No. PCT/US 10/00441 International Search Report Apr. 7, 2010”, , Publisher: PCT, Published in: PCT. |
Young, Lee W., “PCT Application No. PCT/US 10/00424 International Search Report Apr. 9, 2010”, , Publisher: PCT, Published in: PCT. |
Islam, Hasan Z., “U.S. Appl. No. 12/535,768 Office Action Mar. 2, 2012”, , Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US. |
Athina Nickitas-Etienne, “PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/000441 International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, , Publisher: PCT, Published in: PCT Aug. 25, 2011. |
Beate Giffo-Schmitt, “PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/000424 International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, , Publisher: PCT, Published in: PCT , Aug. 25, 2011. |
Carr, William N., “U.S. Appl. No. 12/462,428, filed Aug. 5, 2009”, , Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100066636 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61207467 | Feb 2009 | US | |
61273814 | Aug 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12535768 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 12621451 | US |