This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/130,173, filed on even date, entitled “Testing of Multiple Integrated Circuits,” naming Lucio F. C. Pessoa as inventor, and assigned to the current assignee hereof.
1. Field
This disclosure relates generally to integrated circuits, and more specifically, to testing integrated circuits.
2. Related Art
Multiple core systems have been found to provide better processing power than a single core of the same size. In terms of processing power for a given area, it generally increases with the number of cores. As the number of cores increases, however, the amount of interconnect increases at an even greater rate. Thus, there is typically a judgment with regard to beneficially increasing processing power which causes the detrimental affect of increasing the amount of wiring.
Accordingly, there is a need to have multiple cores while eliminating or reducing the detrimental affect of increased wiring.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and is not limited by the accompanying figures, in which like references indicate similar elements. Elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale.
In one aspect, an integrated circuit has a group of cores that communicate with a packet switch using carrierless ultra wideband (UWB) radio frequency (RF) signaling. The packet switch communicates outside the integrated circuit using optical signaling. The carrierless UWB provides for high frequency communication and processing without requiring additional space for interconnects. Also no special paths are necessary because the signals used by the cores for communicating with the packet switch, as well as with other cores, are RF signals. Therefore they can be broadcast by the packet switch and be received by a plurality of cores. That is, no conductor line or waveguide is required. Because the signals are carrierless they can be transmitted with low power. But with multiple cores providing information to the switch the total information being received by the switch may exceed the capacity of the RF bandwidth so an external optical interface is provided to multiplex information provided via carrierless UWB RF signals by a plurality of cores. This is better understood by reference to the drawings and following description.
Shown in
In a test mode, tester probe 12 outputs a carrierless UWB RF signal that includes test instructions using antenna structure 13. Antenna structure 13 may include more than one antenna. The test instructions are received by the integrated circuits of completed wafer 14 including integrated circuits 16 and 18. In particular, antennas 24 and 54 receive the test signals. Packet switch 20 interprets the test signals and transmits corresponding core test signals, as a carrierless UWB RF signal, using antenna 24 to antennas 38-48. Cores 26-36 perform tests according to the core test signals received by antennas 38-48, respectively. Similarly, packet switch 50 interprets the test signals and transmits corresponding core test signals as a carrierless UWB RF signal using antenna 54 to antennas 68-78. Cores 56-66 perform tests according to the core test signals received by antennas 68-78, respectively. Cores 26-36 communicate results, as a carrierless UWB RF signal, of running the tests to packet switch 20 from antennas 38-48 to antenna 24. Similarly, cores 56-66 communicate results, as a carrierless UWB RF signal, of running the tests to packet switch 50 from antennas 68-78 to antenna 54. Packet switch 20 provides the results external to integrated circuit 16 by carrierless UWB RF, wired, and/or optical signaling. Similarly, packet switch 50 provides the results external to integrated circuit 18 by carrierless UWB RF, wired, and/or optical signaling. For test results, it is likely that the bandwidth requirements for the data may be met by all of the following three options: carrierless UWB RF, wired, and optical signaling. In the case of using carrierless UWB RF, each of packet switches 20 and 50 may include a code unique for each integrated circuit so that tester probe can determine which results apply to which integrated circuit. Also power will likely be increased over that for communicating among the cores. Thus, the result is that multiple integrated circuits can simultaneously be tested. Further these tests are not functionally limited by physical contact probes which introduce capacitance and require probe pads on the integrated circuit. Thus, the integrated circuits may be fully tested. This can allow for shipping fully tested wafers, even after wafer level burn-in. It can also allow for testing or debugging of integrated circuits within their packages during normal operation. For example, debugging application software of a complex system that is executed by one or more cores can be performed much more effectively as the tester probe has a large capacity for communicating debugging information to/from the one or more cores.
Integrated circuits 16 and 18, if they pass the tests, may be singulated and packaged and included in a processing system. In normal operation of integrated circuit 16, for example, core group 22 performs processor operations as a multicore system. Cores 26-36 communicate among themselves by carrierless UWB RF using antennas 38-48 and communicate with packet switch 20 also by carrierless UWB RF. Antennas 38-48 within integrated circuit 16 also allow for testing or debugging during normal operation. Core group 22 can have a very large number of cores generating information that is communicated to packet switch 20. Thus, the information being transmitted to packet switch 20 can be so large that the capacity of the carrierless UWB RF bandwidth may be exceeded. Packet switch 20 has an optical interface that has a much greater capacity, typically more than an order of magnitude, than carrierless UWB RF.
Carrierless UWB RF is very convenient for communicating with and among cores. Carrierless UWB RF is a type of UWB RF. UWB RF can be broadcast over circuitry without disturbing the circuitry because it is spread over a wide frequency range. The affect is that no single frequency band has enough energy to disturb circuitry. Carrierless UWB RF does this as well but with a further benefit of not needing to generate a high frequency signal for a carrier. Generating a carrier typically requires precision circuitry for generating a sinusoidal signal at high frequency. Such a circuit requires much power and sophisticated circuitry for maintaining the required tight control of the frequency. Accordingly, carrierless UWB RF, which may use impulses for identifying logic highs and logic lows. An impulse, in the frequency domain, has its energy spread over a wide frequency range and so is perceived as low energy noise by other circuitry. Of course in practice a perfect impulse is not possible, but the technology has developed so that the frequency range does extend into the RF range. Thus, these impulses may be transmitted from an antenna as an electromagnetic wave and received by another antenna. A logic high may be distinguished from a logic low by the impulse having its leading edge be positive going or negative going. This may also be considered changing the phase of the impulse. Thus, under one convention, an impulse whose leading edge is positive going can be considered a logic high and an impulse whose leading edge is negative going can be considered a logic low. Another convention is to use one short train of impulses for one logic state and a different short train of impulses be the other logic state. By using impulses applied to antennas that broadcast the carrierless UWB RF, data is transferred among cores without requiring wiring to communicate among cores. Because the signal is in the RF range, the signal does not require a dedicated line, be it wire or waveguide, to pass from packet switch 20 and cores 26-36 or from cores 26-36 to packet switch 20. The power used controls the distance over which the carrierless UWB RF is effective. Thus, cores 26-36 of core group 22 are designed to have enough power to reach packet switch 20 but not to extend outside of integrated circuit 16. Packet switch 20 may have multiple antennas located in proximity to the various cores to achieve the needed information transfer while keeping power low. By using carrierless UWB RF, there is no, or at least a significantly reduced, wiring needed for carrying signals among the cores and between the cores and packet switch 20. Further the power is significantly reduced with respect to conventional wiring interconnects. One reason is that the data being generated is simply an impulse or series of impulses for defining the logic state of a signal so nearly all of the power is the impulse itself. Also, the power requirement is very low when data is being generated, especially when compared to RF that requires a carrier because there is then an oscillator operating even if no data is being transferred. Using packet technology, packet switch 20 can accumulate packet data from cores 26-36, for example, and then send out completed data assembled from the packet data.
Shown in
Shown in
By now it should be appreciated that there has been provided an integrated circuit. The integrated circuit includes a packet switch having an optical transceiver, a first carrierless ultra wideband (UWB) radio frequency (RF) transceiver, and a packet processor which communicates data packets between the optical transceiver and the first carrierless UWB RF transceiver. The integrated circuit includes a first module which communicates via carrierless UWB RF signaling with the first carrierless UWB RF transceiver. The integrated circuit may be further characterized by the packet processor translating between carrierless UWB RF data packets and optical data packets. The integrated circuit may be further characterized by the packet switch further including a second carrierless UWB RF transceiver, the integrated circuit further comprising a second module which communicates via carrierless UWB RF signaling with the second carrierless UWB RF transceiver. The integrated circuit may be further characterized by the packet switch receiving, via the optical transceiver, a plurality of optical data packets, translating the plurality of optical data packets into a plurality of carrierless UWB RF data packets, and distributing the plurality of carrierless UWB RF data packets between the first and second carrierless UWB RF transceivers. The integrated circuit may be further characterized by the packet switch receiving, via the first and second carrierless UWB RF transceivers, a plurality of carrierless UWB RF data packets, translating the plurality of carrierless UWB RF data packets into optical data packets and multiplexing the plurality of optical data packets via the optical transceiver. The integrated circuit may be further characterized by each of the first UWB RF transceiver and the second UWB RF transceiver communicating with an external test probe having at least one antenna. The integrated circuit may be further characterized by the first UWB RF transceiver communicating with an external test probe having at least one antenna. The integrated circuit may be further characterized by the packet switch further comprising a transceiver control unit coupled to the optical transceiver and the first carrierless UWB RF transceiver to configure the optical transceiver and the first carrierless UWB RF transceiver. The integrated circuit may be further characterized by the first module comprising a processor core. The integrated circuit may be further characterized by the optical transceiver communicating with an external tester.
Also described is an integrated circuit. The integrated circuit includes a packet switch having an optical transceiver, a plurality of carrierless ultra wideband (UWB) radio frequency (RF) transceivers, and a packet processor which translates carrierless UWB RF data packets received via the plurality of carrierless UWB RF transceivers to optical data packets to be output by the optical transceiver and translates optical data packets received via the optical transceiver to carrierless UWB RF data packets to be output by one or more of the plurality of carrierless UWB RF transceivers. The integrated circuit also includes a plurality of processor cores, wherein each processor core communicates carrierless UWB RF data packets with a corresponding one of the plurality of carrierless UWB RF transceivers. The integrated circuit may be further characterized by one or more of the plurality of processor cores communicates carrierless UWB RF data packets with one or more other processor cores of the plurality of processor cores. The integrated circuit may be further characterized by one or more of the plurality of processor cores communicating carrierless UWB RF data packets directly with an external test probe having at least one antenna. The integrated circuit may be further characterized by the packet switch distributing the received and translated optical data packets among at least a subset of the plurality of carrierless UWB RF transceivers. The integrated circuit may be further characterized by the packet switch further comprising a transceiver control unit coupled to the optical transceiver and each of the plurality of carrierless UWB RF transceivers to configure the optical transceiver and the plurality of carrierless UWB RF transceivers.
Described also is method using an integrated circuit. The method includes a first module located on the integrated circuit providing a first plurality of carrierless UWB RF data packets to a first carrierless UWB RF transceiver. The method further includes a packet processor located on the integrated circuit and coupled to the first carrierless UWB RF transceiver translating the first plurality of carrierless UWB RF data packets into a first plurality of optical data packets. The method further includes communicating the first plurality of optical data packets external to the integrated circuit via an optical transceiver coupled to the packet processor. The method may further include the optical transceiver receiving a second plurality of optical data packets, the packet processor translating the second plurality of optical data packets into a second plurality of carrierless UWB RF data packets, providing, via the first carrierless UWB RF transceiver, at least a portion of the second plurality of carrierless UWB RF data packets to the first module. The method may further comprise a second module located on the integrated circuit providing a second plurality of carrierless UWB RF data packets to a second carrierless UWB transceiver, the packet processor translating the second plurality of carrierless UWB RF data packets into a second plurality of optical data packets, and communicating the second plurality of optical data packets external to the integrated circuit via the optical transceiver. The method may further comprise communicating a third plurality of carrierless UWB RF data packets between the first module and the second module. The method may further comprise communicating a second plurality of carrierless UWB RF data packets between the first carrierless UWB RF transceiver and an external test probe having at least one antenna.
Although the invention is described herein with reference to specific embodiments, various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention as set forth in the claims below. For example, the tester was shown and described as testing all of the integrated circuits of the wafer simultaneously but it may be beneficial to not test all of them simultaneously. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention. Any benefits, advantages, or solutions to problems that are described herein with regard to specific embodiments are not intended to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or element of any or all the claims.
The term “coupled,” as used herein, is not intended to be limited to a direct coupling or a mechanical coupling.
Furthermore, the terms “a” or “an,” as used herein, are defined as one or more than one. Also, the use of introductory phrases such as “at least one” and “one or more” in the claims should not be construed to imply that the introduction of another claim element by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim element to inventions containing only one such element, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an.” The same holds true for the use of definite articles.
Unless stated otherwise, terms such as “first” and “second” are used to arbitrarily distinguish between the elements such terms describe. Thus, these terms are not necessarily intended to indicate temporal or other prioritization of such elements.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4330870 | Arends | May 1982 | A |
5321542 | Freitas et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5561846 | Hagio | Oct 1996 | A |
5598290 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5619361 | Sagesaka et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5638052 | Furuya et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5639989 | Higgins, III | Jun 1997 | A |
5696500 | Diem | Dec 1997 | A |
6236223 | Brady et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6271815 | Yang et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6307169 | Sun et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307452 | Sun | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6362018 | Xu et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6384353 | Huang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6410941 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411111 | Gao et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6441449 | Xu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445369 | Yang et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459344 | Pavio et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6590410 | Hirt | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6717430 | Burch | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6815973 | Conn | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6830221 | Janson et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842144 | Guo et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845670 | McNeil et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6870444 | Zurcher et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6885202 | Slupsky | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891991 | Klosowiak et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6897663 | Conn | May 2005 | B1 |
6921975 | Leal et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6936942 | Okazaki et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6953994 | Kaewell, Jr. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6995889 | Li et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7020400 | Trezza et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7057518 | Schmidt | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7109460 | Diamanstein et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7121141 | McNeil | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20030056196 | Kim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040008142 | Guo et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008992 | Nishimura | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040100376 | Lye et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040164760 | Moore | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050070226 | Rigge | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073045 | Kaewell, Jr. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075080 | Zhang | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050130698 | Won | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138499 | Pileggi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050232638 | Fucile et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050253225 | Kaewell, Jr. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050285541 | LeChevalier | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060048006 | Lou | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056855 | Nakagawa et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060172719 | Chen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179374 | Noble | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070091814 | Leung et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070182438 | Khandros et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070300125 | Xia et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080130689 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080204055 | Pagani | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090297146 | Pessoa et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1564914 | Oct 2003 | EP |
9942984 | Aug 1999 | WO |
9942985 | Aug 1999 | WO |
9949435 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090297146 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |