As oil well drilling becomes increasingly complex, the importance of collecting downhole data while drilling increases.
As shown in
The terms “couple” or “couples,” as used herein are intended to mean either an indirect or direct connection. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that connection may be through a direct connection, or through an indirect electrical connection via other devices and connections. The term “upstream” as used herein means along a flow path towards the source of the flow, and the term “downstream” as used herein means along a flow path away from the source of the flow.
It will be understood that the term “oil well drilling equipment” or “oil well drilling system” is not intended to limit the use of the equipment and processes described with those terms to drilling an oil well. The terms also encompass drilling natural gas wells or hydrocarbon wells in general. Further, such wells can be used for production, monitoring, or injection in relation to the recovery of hydrocarbons or other materials from the subsurface.
One or more pressure sensors 175 may be distributed along the drillpipe, with the distribution depending on the needs of the system. One or more such pressure sensors 175 may be used to measure pressure along the drillpipe. In an example implementation, one or more pressure sensors 175 are located on or within the drillpipe 140. Other pressure sensors 175 may be on or within the drill collar 145 or the one or more MWD/LWD tools 150. Still other pressure sensors 175 may be in built into, or otherwise coupled to, the bit 160. Still other pressure sensor 175 may be disposed on or within one or more subs 155.
Other pressure sensors 175 may be located at or near the surface to measure, for example, one or more of drilling fluid supply line (e.g., standpipe) or return line pressures. In many cases a pressure sensor 175 located on or along the standpipe 196 (or other drilling fluid supply line location) may be used to provide drillstring interior pressure measurements at or near the top of the drillstring or borehole. In certain example implementations, the drillstring interior pressure may be determined inferentially based on pressure measurements, using, for example, pressure measurements taken from the drilling fluid supply line. In some example implementations, a pressure sensor 175 located on or along a return line may be used to provide drillstring exterior or annulus pressure measurements at or near the top of the drillstring or borehole. In some example systems, drillstring exterior or annulus pressure measurements at or near the top of the drillstring or borehole may be determined inferentially, using, for example, pressure measurements taken on a return line. In some example systems, drillstring exterior pressure at the top of the drillstring or borehole may be determined inferentially based on atmospheric pressure. Still other pressure sensors 175 may be affixed to one or more locations along the borehole 165. Other pressure sensors 175 may be circulated in the drilling fluid.
In certain implementations, one or more pressure sensors 175 may be ported (e.g., hydraulically ported) to the outside of one or more portions of the drillstring, such as the drillpipe 140, the drill collar 145, the MWD/LWD tools 150, the subs 155, or the bit 160. The pressure sensors 175 ported to the outside of the drillstring may measure one or more pressures in an annulus defined by the drillstring and the borehole 165. In certain example implementations, one or more pressure sensors 175 may be ported to the interior of the drillstring and may measure the pressure within the drillstring. In certain implementations, one or more pressure sensors 175 may be ported to the exterior of the drillstring to measure one or more pressures in the annulus and one or more other pressure sensors 175 may be ported to the interior of the drillstring to measure one or more pressures within the drillstring. Pressure sensors 175 may be ported to the interior or exterior of drillstring elements to obtain static pressure measurements.
In certain implementations, one or more pressure sensors 175 may be ported to drillstring components that are used for drilling and that are subsequently left in the borehole 165. These drillstring components may be used in casing-while-drilling (i.e. drilling with casing) operations. The drillstring components may be included in a completed well. In such implementations, one or more pressure sensors may measure and report pressure after drilling operations are complete.
The pressure sensors 175 convert pressures to one or more signals. One or more pressure sensors 175 may include strain gauge type devices, quartz crystal devices, fiber optical devices, or other devices used in sensing pressure. The one or more signals from the pressure sensors 175 may be analog or digital. In certain implementations, one or more pressure sensors 175 may be oriented to measure one or more static pressures. For example, one or more pressure sensors 175 may be oriented perpendicular to streamlines of the drilling fluid flow. One or more pressure sensors 175 may measure stagnation pressure by orienting the pressure sensors 175 to face, or partially face, into the drilling fluid flow. In certain implementations, one or more pressure sensors 175 may use an extended pitot tube approach or a shallow ramping port to orient the sensors 175 to face, or partially face, into the drilling fluid flow. The measurement accuracy of the stagnation pressure may vary depending on a degree of boundary layer influence.
A portion of drillpipe 140 is schematically illustrated in
In one example system, the communications medium 205 may be located within an inner annulus of the drillpipe 140. The communications medium 205 may comprise one or more concentric layers of a conductor and an insulator disposed within the drillstring. In another example system, the drillpipe 140 may have a gun-drilled channel though at least portions of its length. In such a drillpipe 140, the communications medium 205 may be placed in the gun-drilled channel. In another example system, the communications medium 205 may be fully or partly located within a protective housing, such as a capillary tubing that runs at least a portion of the length of the drillpipe 140. The protective housing may be attached or biased to the drillpipe inner diameter or stabilized within the drillpipe bore.
The communications medium 205 may be a wire, a cable, a fluid, a fiber, or any other medium. In certain implementations, the communications medium may permit high data transfer rates. The communications medium 205 may include one or more communications paths. For example, one communications path may connect to one or more pressure sensors 175, while another communications path may connect another one or more sensor sensors 175. The communications medium 205 may extend from the drillpipe 140 to the subs 155, drill collar 145, MWD/LWD tools 150, and the bit 160. The communications medium 205 may include physical connectors or mating conductors to complete a transition in the communications medium 205 across drillpipe joints and other connections.
The communications medium 205 may transition from one type to another along the drillstring. For example, one or more portions of the communications medium 205 may include an LWD system communications bus. One more or portions of the communications medium 205 may comprise a “short-hop” electromagnetic link or an acoustical telemetry link. The “short-hop” electromagnetic links or acoustical telemetry link may be used to interface between drillpipe joints or across difficult-to-wire drillstring components such as mud motors.
A processor 180 may be used to collect and analyze data from one or more pressure sensors 175 This processor 180 may process the pressure data and provide an output that is a function of the processed or unprocessed pressure data. This output may then be used in the drilling process. The processor may include one or more processing units that operate together (e.g., symmetrically or in parallel) or one or more processing units that operate separately. The processing units may be in the same location or in distributed locations. The processor 180 may alternatively be located below the surface, for example, within the drillstring. The processor 180 may operate at a speed that is sufficient to be useful in the drilling process. The processor 180 may include or interface with a terminal 185. The terminal 185 may allow an operator to interact with the processor 180.
The communications medium 205 may transition to connect the drillstring to the processor 180. The transition may include a mechanical contact which may include a rotary brush electrical connection. The transition may include a non-contact link which may include an inductive couple or a short-hop electromagnetic link.
The pressure sensors 175 may communicate with the processor 180 through the communications medium 205. Communications over the communications medium 205 can be in the form of network communications, using, for example, Ethernet. Each of the pressure sensors 175 may be addressable individually or in one or more groups. Alternatively, communications can be point-to-point. Whatever form it takes, the communications medium 205 may provide high-speed data communication between the sensors in the borehole 165 and the processor 180. The speed and bandwidth characteristics of the communications medium 205 may allow the processor 180 to perform collection and analysis of data from the pressure sensors 175 fast enough for use in the drilling process. This data collection and analysis may be referred to as “real-time” processing. Therefore, as used herein, the term “real-time” means a speed that is useful in the drilling process.
A portion of drillpipe 140, including a sensor-module receptacle 310 is illustrated in
A portion of drillpipe 140, including a pressure sensor 175 in sensor-module receptacle 310 is illustrated in
In addition to sensor-module receptacles 310, pressure sensors 175 may also be mounted on gaskets between joints of drillpipe. Two joints of drillpipe 505 and 510 with a gasket 515 are schematically illustrated in
In addition to sensor-module receptacles 310 and gaskets 515, pressure sensors 175 may also be mounted in the ends of drillpipe joints. A cross-sectional diagram of the box end 605 of a drillpipe joint is shown in
A cross-sectional diagram of an example sub 155 is shown in
An example pressure sensor 175, shown schematically in
The output from the sensor device 805 may be digital or analog. Depending on the mode of communications used over the communications medium 205, the output from the sensor may require conversion from analog to digital with an analog-to-digital converter 810. The pressure sensor 175 may also include a plurality of analog-to-digital converters 810 to accommodate multiple sensors 805. After the sensor device 805 has produced a signal indicative of the measured property, the signal will be coupled to the communication medium 205 using a communications coupler, which may include a sensor coupler 815 within the pressure sensor 175 and may include a drillpipe coupler 315 (shown in
The communication coupler, which is the combination of the sensor coupler 815 and the drillpipe coupler 315, performs signal transformations necessary to couple the sensor signal to the communications medium 205. One example communication coupler may re-encode the signal from the sensor device 805 or the analog-to-digital converter, include header information, and transmit the signal over the communication medium 205.
An example complementary pair of sensor-coupler and drillpipe-coupler connectors 820 and 905 is shown schematically in section view in
Another example complementary pair of sensor-coupler and drillpipe-coupler connectors 820 and 905 is shown in
In another example system, the sensor-coupler connector 820 and the drillpipe-coupler connector 905 may include inductors or coils. The sensor coupler 815 may pass current though its inductor to create an electromagnetic field indicative of the sensor signal. The electromagnetic field, in turn, induces a current in the drillpipe coupler's inductor. In another example system, the connectors 820 and 905 may form two plates of a capacitor allowing a signal to be capacitively induced on the opposing plate. The pressure sensor 175 or the base of the sensor-module receptacle 310 may include a coating or insert to provide a dielectric between the connectors 820 and 905 for capacitive coupling.
Returning to
An example system for detecting downhole conditions based on one or more pressure measurements from one or more pressure sensors 175 is shown in
Creating the set of expected pressure values (block 1205) may include receiving one or more expected pressures from an external source (e.g., a user, a database, or another processor). Creating the expected-pressure set may include accessing simulation results such as modeling results. The modeling to create the expected pressure values may include hydraulics modeling. The hydraulics modeling may consider one or more of the following: properties of the borehole and drillstring, fluid properties, previous pressure measurements from the borehole or another borehole, or other measurements. In some implementations an expected-pressure set may be created by copying one or more values from a measured-pressure set. In other implementations an expected-pressure set may be created by using values from a measured-pressure set and adjusting or operating upon the values in accordance with an algorithm or model. Some implementations utilizing measured-pressure sets in the creation of expected-pressure sets may use measured-pressure sets from a recent time window, an earlier time window, or multiple time windows. Certain example expected-pressure sets may be derived from trend analysis of measured-pressure sets, such trends being observed or calculated in reference to for example elapsed time, circulation time, drilling time, depth, another variable, or combinations of variables.
The set of expected pressure values may include one or more pressure values at one or more depths in the borehole 165. The depths may be locations of interest within the borehole 165. A set of expected values may be provided or determined corresponding to all or a portion of the fluid flow path within the borehole 165. The set of expected pressure values may represent one or more pressure profiles. A pressure profile may include a set of two or more pressures, and a set of two or more depths, or ranges of depths, where each pressure corresponds to a depth or a range of depths. The pressure profiles may exist, may be measurable, and may be modelable along the continuum of fluid or fluids in the borehole 165 along one or more fluid flow paths within the borehole 165 and along one or more drillstring/borehole 165 hydraulic paths or circuits.
Example pressure profiles may include one or more hydrostatic profiles. Other example pressure profiles include one or more static pressure profiles that may include losses. The losses may include frictional losses or major losses. Other example pressure profiles may include stagnation pressure profiles. The stagnation pressure profiles may be related to flow velocity. Example pressure profiles may include arithmetic or other combinations or superposition of profiles.
While drilling the borehole 165, the processor 180 may change the expected-pressure set to reflect changes in the well. The processor 180 may change the expected-pressure set to reflect drilling progress (e.g., increasing depth). The processor 180 may alter the expected-pressure set to account for one or more known or unknown drilling process events or conditions. Changes to the pressure profile may be consistent or inconsistent with modeling, forecasts, or experience.
The processor 180 may model or be provided hydrostatic pressures, hydrostatic profiles, and changes in hydrostatic pressure within the drillstring or the borehole 165. The processor 180 may model or be provided frictional pressures, frictional profiles, frictional losses, or frictional changes within the drillstring or the borehole 165. The processor 180 may model or be provided with one or more stagnation pressures, stagnation pressure profiles, stagnation pressure losses, or stagnation pressure changes within the drillstring or the borehole 165. The processor 180 may consider one or more factors impacting pressure including the dimensions of the drillstring (e.g., inner and outer diameters of joints or other portions of the drillpipe and other drillstring elements) and dimensions of the borehole 165. The processor 180 may also consider one or more depths corresponding to one or more measured pressures within the borehole 165. The processor 180 may consider drilling fluid properties (e.g., flow rates, densities), one or more major loss sources (e.g., drill bit nozzles or mud motors), and whether one or more portions of the borehole 165 are cased or open hole.
The processor 180 may be provided with or calculate one or more depths when calculating the expected-pressure set. The depths may include one or more of the following: the true-vertical depth (TVD) (i.e., only the vertical component of the depth), measured depth (MD) (i.e., the direction-less distance from the start of the borehole or other reference point chosen such as ground level, sea level, or rig level, to the bottom of the borehole or other point of interest along the borehole), and the round-trip depth (RTD). In general, the RTD is the direction-less distance traveled by the drilling fluid. The RTD may be measured from the mud pumps or the start of borehole 165 (or another starting reference point) to the end of the drillstring (e.g., the bit 160) and back to a return reference point. The return reference point may be the start of the borehole 165, the point where fluid in the return line reaches atmospheric pressure, or another point. The end of the drillstring may or may not correspond to the bottom of the borehole 165. The processor 180 may be provided with or determine the TVD of the borehole 165 to determine the hydrostatic changes in pressure. The processor 180 may be provided with or calculate the measured depth (MD) of the borehole 165 to determine frictional and other pressure changes.
An example borehole 1300 that may be modeled by the processor 180 is shown schematically in
An example expected-pressure set based on borehole 1300 having dimensions described above is shown in
Each of pressure segments in an expected-pressure set may change based on the configuration of the drillstring. For example, the drillstring may include one or more subs 155 or MWD/LWD tools 150 that may cause internal flow restriction relative to the drillpipe 140. In such a situation, the expected pressure profile may consider the subs 155 and the MWD/LWD tools 150 and their location along the drillstring (e.g., within different borehole segments) when determining the expected-pressure set. The processor 180 may alter the expected-pressure set to account for pressure changes caused by subs 155 or the MWD/LWD tools 150 in the pressure segment where the subs 155 or the MWD/LWD tools 150 are located. The expected-pressure profile may also account for resulting pressure changes to the segments upstream of the subs 155 and the MWD/LWD tools 150. The expected-pressure set may reflect gradient and pressure loss relationships.
Another example expected-pressure set based on borehole 1300 with dimensions described above is shown in
Returning to
In certain example implementations, the processor may not determine the one or more gradients (block 1220). For example, if the processor 180 is detecting at least one downhole condition which can be detected by observing absolute differences between one or more measured pressures, or between one or more measured pressures and one or more expected pressures, it may not determine the one or more gradients.
The number and location of the pressure sensors 175 may affect the number of pressure-versus-depth data points available in the measured-pressure set. Additionally, any pressure sensor 175 that is moved from one location to another (e.g., during drilling or tripping) may provide multiple data points in a measured-pressure set.
At least two pressure-versus-depth data points may be used to determine a measured-pressure gradient. Where actual pressure-versus-depth data points are not available, the processor 180 may estimate one or more pressure-versus-depth data points. The processor 180 may estimate pressure-versus-depth data points by interpolating between data points, extrapolating gradients, or determining transitions between gradients.
In certain example system, the measured-value set of pressures, the expected-value set of pressures, or both may be displayed to the operator using the terminal 185. For example, the measured-value set of pressures may be juxtaposed to the expected-value set of pressured using the terminal 185, allowing the user to manually detect, identify, characterize, or locate a downhole condition. The measured-value sets and the expected-value sets may be presented to the user in a graphical format (e.g., a chart, log, plot, or series of plots) or in a textual format (e.g., a table of values). Certain example systems may include presenting an evolution of one or more of the measured-value sets of pressures and the expected-value sets of pressures to the user. For example, the system may display a series of plots to the user to demonstrate the evolution of one or more of the measured-value sets of pressures and the expected-value sets of pressures. The system may display an evolution of both the measured-value set of pressures and the expected-value set of pressures. Certain evolutions may be evolutions over time, depth, or other variables or combinations of variables.
Individual measured pressures in the measured-pressure set may be measured in a short time window (e.g., seconds) for minimized delay in detecting of conditions. In many implementations individual measured pressures in the measured-pressure set may be measured substantially simultaneously. As used herein, “substantially simultaneously” means only that the measurements are taken in the same time period during which conditions are not expected to change significantly, in the context of the particular operational process. For example, during drilling or in-slips, and during constant flow periods (i.e., either when the pumps are on and steady or when they are off), a measured-pressure set may include relevant pressure characteristics between the individual depths, even if the individual pressures are obtained tens of seconds or even minutes apart. Many downhole conditions (e.g., cuttings build-up) may be detected using measured-pressure sets, the values of which are obtained in a time window of minutes. During transient operational processes such as tripping or transitioning flow rate, and for detection of events or conditions which have a faster time constant (e.g., gas influx), a shorter time window for collecting and analyzing a measured-pressure set may be preferred.
Individual measured pressures in the measured-pressure set may be measured sequentially. In some example implementations, the sequence by which the pressures are measured may be controllable by, for example, the processor 180. For example, the sequence by which the pressure is measured may be determined by an algorithm based on drilling conditions or other factors.
Example systems may provide measured versus expected pressures, profiles, or gradients in different operational processes of well construction, including, for example and without limitation: on-bottom rotary drilling, sliding, tripping, off-bottom circulating for hole cleaning, circulating up a kick, circulating pills or transitioning mud types, and leak-off testing.
An example system for determining if there is a downhole condition (block 1230) is shown in
The processor 180 may determine whether any of the quantities are out of range (blocks 1605-1630) by determining if the difference between the measured property (e.g., measured static pressure or static pressure gradient) and the expected property (e.g., expected static pressure or static pressure gradient) is greater than a maximum delta for the property.
In certain implementations, the maximum delta may be determined automatically by the processor 180. In other implementations the maximum delta may be input by an operator. In other implementations, the maximum delta may be obtained from a separate processor or model. In certain implementations, the maximum delta may be determined by an operator or an independent model based on one or more measured pressures.
The maximum delta determination may be based on an absolute difference versus an expected value, or it may be based on a percentage deviation from the expected value. The maximum delta may be based upon a function. For example, the maximum delta may increase or decrease with depth. The maximum delta may vary over a depth range or over an operational phase. For example, the maximum delta may be adjusted for a certain depth interval due to narrow pore pressure-fracture gradient window. The maximum delta determination may also be dependent on time. In certain implementations, a difference between a measured pressure and an expected pressure exceeding the maximum delta may be not be acted on unless it persists for a particular duration or longer.
Returning to
If the processor 180 determines that there is a downhole condition (block 1230), it may identify the condition (e.g. determine the type condition detected), it may characterize the downhole condition (e.g. determine the magnitude or other properties of the downhole condition), and it may locate the position of the downhole condition (e.g. determine the depth or depth interval of the detected condition) (block 1235), and it may take additional actions (block 1240).
An example system for identifying, locating, and characterizing at least one downhole condition (block 1235) is shown in
An example system for identifying and locating a pipe wash-out (block 1710) is shown in
An example measured-value set (1910) and expected-value set (1905) demonstrating a possible pipe wash-out condition is shown in
Using the data shown in
An example system for identifying and locating lost circulation (e.g., fluid escaping into the formation) (block 1715) is shown in
An example measured-value set (2305) and expected-value set (2310) demonstrating a likely lost-circulation condition is shown in
Using the data shown in
An example system for identifying and locating a likely annulus obstruction (block 1720) is shown in
An example measured-value set (2605) and expected-value set (2610) demonstrating an annulus obstruction condition is shown in
Using the data shown in
An example system for identifying and locating a fluid influx into the drillstring (block 1725) is shown in
An example measured-value set (2805) and expected-value set (2810) demonstrating a fluid influx condition is shown in
Using the data shown in
An example system for identifying and locating a cutting build-up (block 1730) is shown in
An example measured-value set (3105) and expected-value set (3110) demonstrating the cutting build-up condition is shown in
Using the data shown in
In certain implementations, one or more pressure sensors 175 may measure annulus static pressures and based on these pressure measurements, the processor 180 may determine that the increase pressure gradient in the interval 3205 reflects increased frictional losses over the interval, which may reflect the increased annular flow velocity and likely cuttings build up. In other implementations, which are not represented in
Returning to
Although the identification and location of downhole conditions has been discussed with respect to normal flow, the system may also identify downhole conditions when operating with reversed flow (e.g., drilling fluid is pumped down the annulus and flows up the drillstring). The processor 180 may detect simultaneous downhole conditions. The processor 180 may separate the pressure indicia of the plurality of downhole conditions using analytical methods. The processor 180 may receive measurements from sources other than pressures sensors mounted to the drillstring to detect at least one downhole condition. For example, the processor 180 may monitor operational data such as the standpipe pressure, rate of penetration, rotary RPM, “in-slips” sensors, hook-load, and the flow rate and other parameters of the drilling fluid, both inbound and outbound.
The downhole conditions may also be characterized by the processor 180 (block 1740). Such characterization may include the determination of a likely magnitude range of the condition. The magnitudes of the measured and expected pressure values and measured and expected-pressure gradients may be indicative (analytically through known hydraulics relationships and/or empirically) of the characteristics of the condition. For example, the particular changes in pressures or gradients may be used to estimate particular percentage of flow bypassing in a wash-out, particular flow rate of a fluid influx, particular lost-flow rate of a lost circulation zone, or particular percentage cross sectional area of an obstruction or a cuttings bedded interval.
The processor 180 may perform additional actions after detecting a downhole condition (block 1240). As shown in
The processor 180 may also modify the expected-pressure set (block 1245), as shown in
The present invention is therefore well-adapted to carry out the objects and attain the ends mentioned, as well as those that are inherent therein. While the invention has been depicted, described and is defined by references to examples of the invention, such a reference does not imply a limitation on the invention, and no such limitation is to be inferred. The invention is capable of considerable modification, alteration and equivalents in form and function, as will occur to those ordinarily skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. The depicted and described examples are not exhaustive of the invention. Consequently, the invention is intended to be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims, giving full cognizance to equivalents in all respects.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/201,733 filed Jul. 5, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/903,377 filed May 28, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/051,762 filed Feb. 4, 2005 and entitled “Multiple Distributed Pressure Measurements,” which, in turn, claims priority to commonly owned U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/550,033, filed Mar. 4, 2004, entitled “Multiple Distributed Sensors Along A Drillpipe,” by Daniel D. Gleitman.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3223184 | Jones et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3827294 | Anderson | Aug 1974 | A |
3846986 | Anderson | Nov 1974 | A |
4273212 | Dorr et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4379493 | Thibodeaux | Apr 1983 | A |
4384483 | Dellinger et al. | May 1983 | A |
4535429 | Russell et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4553428 | Upchurch | Nov 1985 | A |
4697650 | Fontenot | Oct 1987 | A |
4779852 | Wassell | Oct 1988 | A |
4791797 | Paske et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4805449 | Das | Feb 1989 | A |
4941951 | Sheppard | Jul 1990 | A |
5144589 | Hardage | Sep 1992 | A |
5156223 | Hipp | Oct 1992 | A |
5563512 | Mumby | Oct 1996 | A |
5581024 | Meyer, Jr. et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5679894 | Kruger et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5798488 | Beresford et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5804713 | Kluth | Sep 1998 | A |
5812068 | Wisler et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5886303 | Rodney | Mar 1999 | A |
5995020 | Owens et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026914 | Adams | Feb 2000 | A |
6079505 | Pignard et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6176323 | Weirich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179066 | Nasr et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6206108 | Macdonald et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220087 | Hache et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6279392 | Shahin, Jr. et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6325123 | Gao et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6405136 | Li et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6427125 | Gzara et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6464021 | Edwards | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6516880 | Otten et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516898 | Krueger | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6568486 | George | May 2003 | B1 |
6581455 | Berger et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6641434 | Boyle et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6670880 | Hall et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6847304 | McLoughlin | Jan 2005 | B1 |
20020017386 | Ringgenberg et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020074165 | Lee et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030209365 | Downton | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050024231 | Fincher et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2235540 | Mar 1991 | GB |
0206634 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0206716 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0235048 | May 2002 | WO |
03089758 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Falconer, et al. Applications of a Real Time Wellbore Friction Analysis, SPE 18649, 1989, pp. 265-274. |
Frank Reiber, et al., On-Line Torque & Drag: A Real-Time Drilling Performance Optimization Tool, SPE 52836, 1999, pp. 1-10. |
Paul Pastusek, et al., A Model for Borehole Oscillations, SPE 84448, 2003, pp. 1-16. |
Tom Gaynor, et al., Quantifying Tortuosities by Friction Factors in Torque and Drag Model, SPE 77617, 2002, pp. 1-8. |
Ho, H-S., An Improved Modeling Program for Computing the Torque and Drag in Directional and Deep Wells, SPE 18047, 1988, pp. 407-418. |
Johancsik, C.A., et al., Torque and Drag in Directional WellsPrediction and Measurement, SPE 11380, 1984, pp. 201-208. |
Cook, R.L., et al., First Real Time Measurements of Downhole Vibrations, Forces, and Pressures Used to Monitor Directional Drilling Operations, SPE 18651, 1989, pp. 283-290. |
G.E. Guillen and W.G. Lesso Jr., The Use of Weight on Bit, Torque, and Temperature To Enhance Drilling Efficiency, SPE 12165, 1983, pp. 1-12. |
Heisig, G., et al., Downhole Diagnosis of Drilling Dynamics Data Provides New Level Drilling Process Control to Driller, SPE 49206, 1998, pp. 649-658. |
Wolf, S.F., et al., Field Measurements of Downhole Drillstring Vibrations, SPE 14330, 1985, pp. 1-12. |
J.T. Finger, et al., Development of a System for Diagnostic-While-Drilling (DWD), SPE 79884, 2003, pp. 1-9. |
A.J. Mansure, et al., Interpretation of Diagnostics-While-Drilling Data, SPE 84244, 2003, pp. 1-13. |
A. Leseultre, et al., An Instrumented Bit: A Necessary Step to the Intelligent BHA, SPE 39341, pp. 457-463. |
E Alan Coats, Marty Paulk, Chris Dalton, “Wired Composite Tubing Reduces Drilling Risk,” Drilling Contractor, pp. 22-23, Jul./Aug. 2002. |
“IntelliPipe.TM. Technology: Wired for Speed and Durability,” U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy http;//fossil.energy.gov/news/techlines/03/tl.sub.-intellipipe.sub.-rmo- tctest.html, Jun. 5, 2003. |
Michael J. Jellison and David R. Hall, “Intelligent Drill Pipe Creates the Drilling Network,” SPE International, SPE 80454, pp. 1-8, Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, Apr. 15-17, 2003. |
A. Judzis, T. S. Green, G. M. Hoversten, and A. D. Black, “Seismic While Drilling for Enhanced Look-Ahead-of-Bit Capabilities—Case Study of Successful Mud Pulse Coupling Demonstration,” Society of Professional Engineers, SPE 33194, pp. 1-4, Presented at the 2000 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Held in Dallas, Texas, Oct. 1-4, 2000. |
Daniel C. Minette, Eric Molz, “Utilizing Acoustic Standoff Measurements to Improve the Accuracy of Density and Neutron Measurements,” Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., SPE 56447, pp. 1-14, Presented at the 1999 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Held in Houston, Texas, Oct. 3-6, 1999. |
“Telemetry Drill Pipe: Enabling Technology for the Downhole Internet,” http://www.intellipipe.com/brochures.asp, Intellipipe Brochure 1. |
Office Action issued in related Norwegian Patent Application No. 20150463 dated Jan. 27, 2016, 3 pages. |
Search Report issued in related Norwegian Patent Application No. 20150463 dated Jan. 27, 2016, 3 pages. |
“Telemetry Drill Pipe: Enabling Technology for the Downhole Internet,” http://www.intellipipe.com/brochures.asp, Intellipipe Brochure 2. |
Chris Ward and Espen Andreassen, “Pressure-While-Drilling Data Improve Reservoir Drilling Performance,” SPE Drilling & Completion, Mar. 1998, pp. 19-24. |
C.A. Johancsik, et al., Torque and Drag in Directional Wells—Prediction and Measurement, Journal of Petroleum Technology, pp. 987-992 (Jun. 1984). |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/491,567, filed Jul. 31, 2003, Roger Fincher. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/478,237, filed Jun. 13, 2003, Roger Fincher. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/793,350, filed Mar. 4, 2004, Rodney, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/792,541, filed Mar. 3, 2004, Rodney, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/793,537, filed Mar. 4, 2004, Dudley, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/793,062, filed Mar. 4, 2005, Gleitman, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,762, filed Feb. 4, 2005, Daniel Gleitman. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/070,625, filed Mar. 2, 2005, Daniel Gleitman. |
International Search Report issued in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/07082 dated Sep. 20, 2007, 5 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/07082 dated Nov. 6, 2007, 10 pages. |
International Search Report issued in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/006584 dated Dec. 29, 2005, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/006584 dated Sep. 5, 2006, 4 pages. |
International Search Report issued in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/006837 dated Aug. 26, 2005, 1 page. |
Response to Office Action issued in related Canadian Patent Application No. 2,558,447 dated Sep. 24, 2008, 15 pages. |
Office Action issued in related European Patent Application No. 05724179.6 dated Aug. 23, 2013, 6 pages. |
Office Action issued in related European Patent Application No. 05724179.6 dated Feb. 4, 2013, 6 pages. |
Office Action issued in related European Patent Application No. 05724179.6 dated Jun. 26, 2014, 8 pages. |
Examination Report issued in related Great Britain Patent Application No. GB0619566.3 dated Mar. 2, 2007, 3 pages. |
Response to Examination Report issued in related Great Britain Patent Application No. GB0619566.3 dated Mar. 2, 2007, 9 pages. |
Response to Office Action issued in related European Patent Application No. 05724179.6 dated Aug. 23, 2013, 30 pages. |
Response to Office Action issued in related European Patent Application No. 05724179.6 dated Feb. 4, 2013, 19 pages. |
Office Action issued in related Australian Patent Application No. 2005227212 dated Nov. 4, 2009, 2 pages. |
Response to Office Action issued in related Australian Patent Application No. 2005227212 dated Nov. 4, 2009, 11 pages. |
Office Action issued in related Australian Patent Application No. 2005224600 dated Jun. 30, 2010, 2 pages. |
Response to Office Action issued in related Australian Patent Application No. 2005224600 dated Jun. 30, 2010, 11 pages. |
Office Action issued in related Canadian Patent Application No. 2,558,447 dated Sep. 24, 2008, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180223612 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60550033 | Mar 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15201733 | Jul 2016 | US |
Child | 15945394 | US | |
Parent | 13903377 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 15201733 | US | |
Parent | 11051762 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 13903377 | US |