The present invention relates to the field of internal combustion engines for stationary and mobile applications.
Historically, internal combustion engines have been designed and built in various sizes as needed for the respective applications, and typically with fixed engine valve operation as determined by an engine driven camshaft. This results in engines of various sizes being manufactured in various numbers, with some engines, particularly special purpose and large engines, being manufactured in small quantities. This makes such engines very expensive, and expensive for the user to maintain an adequate spare parts inventory for the maintenance of such engines. Further, maintenance normally requires stopping the engine, which in some applications, is particularly troublesome. Sometimes a fully operative backup engine is provided for both the scheduled and unscheduled down times of the main engine.
Also it is rare for an internal combustion engine to be always operated at or near its maximum efficiency operating point. Instead, engine loads for both stationary and mobile applications tend to vary widely with time, and usually well away from the maximum efficiency of the engine.
The present invention comprises multiple engine block and multiple engine internal combustion power plants for both stationary and mobile applications that are highly efficient over a wide range of loads and can be self-optimizing under substantially all operating conditions. In particular, in one embodiment the power plant is based on a four-cylinder piston engine schematically illustrated in
The engine illustrated includes a head with a valve layout generally as shown, each with four poppet valves per cylinder. The right side of the head has intake valves I for taking in air through the intake manifold, with two valves labeled A for each cylinder for delivering air under pressure to the air rail. The left side of the head illustrated in
At the top of the pump assembly is a solenoid operated spool valve 26 which couples the volume 28 over the plunger 20 to a tank 31 through line 32, providing a supply of the hydraulic fluid to the volume 28 over the plunger 20 on the downward motion of the piston 24, and then coupling the output of the hydraulic pump H through lines 34 to a hydraulic accumulator 36 as the plunger 30 rises with piston 24. Of course since the solenoid operated spool valve 26 is electronically controlled, the pumping action can be electronically terminated at any time by not delivering more hydraulic fluid to the accumulator during the upward motion of the plunger 20, but rather allowing that same fluid to continue to reciprocate with the plunger by leaving the fluid coupling to the tank 31 open. The pressure in the tank 31 may be maintained adequate to always encourage the plunger tightly against the respective piston to prevent any noise or other problems developing because of the loose mechanical coupling of the plunger to the piston 24.
The cylinders of the left side of the engine head illustrated in
All of the engine valves I, A and E, as well as the fuel injectors F1, are electronically actuated by techniques that are now well known. Examples of electronically controlled valve actuation systems include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,638,781, 5,713,316, 5,960,753, 5,970,956, 6,148,778, 6,173,685, 6,308,690, 6,360,728, 6,415,749, 6,557,506, 6,575,126, 6,739,293, 7,025,326, 7,032,574, 7,182,068, 7,341,028, 7,387,095, 7,568,633 7,730,858, 8,342,153 and 8,629,745, and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0113906, though fuel injectors having other electronic control may also be used. Examples of electronically controlled fuel injection systems include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,460,329, 5,720,261, 5,829,396, 5,954,030, 6,012,644, 6,085,991, 6,161,770, 6,257,499, 7,032,574, 7,108,200, 7,182,068, 7,412,969, 7,568,632, 7,568,633, 7,694,891, 7,717,359, 8,196,844, 8,282,020, 8,342,153, 8,366,018, 8,579,207, 8,628,031, 8,733,671 and 9,181,890, U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2002/0017573, 2006/0192028, 2007/0007362 and 2010/0012745, and International Publication No. WO2016/196839, though again other types of electronically controlled fuel injectors may be used, though as shall be subsequently seen, high speed valve actuation systems and high speed fuel injection systems are a definite benefit with the present invention.
The engine of
Another embodiment of the power plant of the present invention is based on the exemplary four-cylinder piston engine assembly of
Operation of the engine of
With respect to the lower illustration of
Another reason for limiting the duration of any injection pulse is to prevent an excessive buildup of the boundary layer around the injected fuel. In particular, in a more sustained injection, a boundary layer builds up around the injected fuel, part of which boundary layer will normally have a stoichiometric or near stoichiometric fuel/air ratio. On combustion, this will result in local very hot regions, hot enough to create some level of NOX. Pulsing the injections terminates the growth of the boundary layer on each injection pulse, with a new boundary layer starting on the next injection pulse. In this way, the maximum boundary layer thickness becomes highly limited, with heat from the burning stoichiometric or near stoichiometric areas of the thin boundary layer being rapidly transferred to the cooler adjacent combustion chamber regions and to the fuel spray itself. Consequently, one obtains excellent control of the maximum temperatures in the combustion chamber, and thus can substantially eliminate the generation of NOX.
A four stroke operation of the engines of
The engines of
Now referring to
It may be seen in
An exemplary operation of such an engine may be seen in
The advantage of this embodiment is that it allows, essentially, recovery of part of the exhaust heat by adding heat to the pressurized air in the air rail. In that regard, note that in accordance with the power plants disclosed, combustion cylinders that are operative are generally operative at a substantial power setting, so that the exhaust temperature will normally be high enough to transfer heat to the air rail A. Note also that such engines are easily ganged by matching intake manifold to intake manifold, which may well be a single intake manifold between engines.
A further embodiment of the power plants of the present invention with four, four-cylinder ganged engines is illustrated in
One of the unique aspects of this embodiment is the fact that the engines may run as compression ignition engines on liquid fuel only, such as hemp or diesel fuel injected by injectors F1 into the combustion chamber at the proper time for compression ignition, or on a gaseous fuel F2 such as compressed natural gas mixed in the intake manifolds using a pulse of liquid fuel at or near the top dead center position of the engine piston to initiate ignition. An exemplary operating sequence is illustrated in
As a still further embodiment, engines in accordance with the present invention can be ganged with gearing using over running or freewheeling clutches between at least some engines to allow the actual shutting down of one or more engines, thereby not only eliminating the power contribution of such engines to the output of the power plant when reduced output power is needed, but to also eliminate the friction of those engines, thereby allowing the engines that remain operating to operate at or very near their maximum efficiency. Of course a power plant of a general configuration as shown in
Further, while aspects of the present invention have been disclosed herein with respect to an even number of four cylinder engine blocks, engine blocks of greater or lesser number of cylinders, and/or an odd number of engine blocks could be used if desired, all within the principles of the invention.
In the foregoing description, certain exemplary operating cycles were described, generally with respect to the electronically controlled operation of the engine valves and fuel injectors, though precise values for the timing of the operation of these devices and the duration of operation was not set forth. One of the key aspects of the invention is the fact that the precise values for the most efficient operation (or any other operating mode such as the highest power mode) are essentially determined by the engines themselves. In that regard, a block diagram of an exemplary controller for the engines of a power plant of the present invention may be seen in
This is important to the present invention, as it is desired to be able to operate any number of engines or portions of an engine in an optimum manner, typically the most efficient manner, though some other desired characteristic may be desired at the time, such as maximum power, or even absolute minimum emissions or minimum noise. This is to be compared with the four, six and eight cylinder operation of eight-cylinder engines. In particular, in four, six and eight-cylinder operation of eight-cylinder engines, greater efficiency is obtained in eight-cylinder gasoline engines by shutting down two or four cylinders for lower engine loads. However it should be noted that in doing so, there are still potential inefficiencies that could be eliminated, as are eliminated in the present invention. In particular, operating an eight-cylinder engine on four cylinders generally carries with it the friction and other loses of an eight-cylinder engine. Further, those four cylinders may well be operating in an off-optimum operating condition that could be corrected by operating three or five cylinders.
In the present invention, because the engines are smaller than the single large engine, smaller increments in optimum power may readily be obtained while not suffering the inefficiencies of the high friction of a single large engine. Of course the specific operating cycles that have been disclosed herein have been disclosed for purposes of explanation and not for purposes of limitation, as users of the concepts of the present invention may reconfigure the engines and change the operating cycles, as desired, simply by reprogramming the controller or providing separate manually operable controls for each power plant parameter, at least for engine operating parameters during the development process.
The controller shown in
The power plants of the present invention use identical engine block assemblies, which helps reduce cost. The phrase identical engine block assemblies as used herein and in the claims means that such assemblies use internal parts of the same design, such as, for crankshaft engines, pistons, connecting rods, crankshafts and bearings, though the external parts may differ somewhat, such as, for example, different blocks themselves may have different mounting provisions, etc., though ideally the number of variations should be held to a minimum to simplify manufacturing, inventorying and maintenance of the engines. In that regard, smaller block assemblies, etc., manufactured in very large quantities, can be highly reliable and less costly, even when used in plurality to provide the power of a large engine. The power plants of the present invention also eliminate the need for very expensive large backup engines, which tend to be more expensive than a plurality of smaller engines because of the quantities in which smaller engines are produced. This savings is amplified by the fact that the entire power plant need not be replicated, but only the number of engines that in a worst case scenario, might fail simultaneously need be replicated. The heads of the identical engine block assemblies may be identical or differ somewhat. If desired, wet sleeve engines may be used, essentially allowing each engine block assembly to be entirely rebuilt numerous times. Also free piston engines may also be used, such as, by way of example, those of U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,596,230, 9,464,569 and 9,206,738, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Such engines provide a direct hydraulic output, eliminating the need for a hydraulic pump on the power plant output, such as used in the embodiment of
In general, while the embodiments disclosed herein have a shared air rail or manifold between adjacent engines, that is not a limitation of the invention, as multiple identical engine block assemblies may be mounted side by side with independent air rail and manifolds, or mounted to share engine functions such as in the embodiment of
It was previously mentioned that the controller preferably operates in closed loops, essentially with substantially infinite variability in the engine valve and fuel injector operation, and thus has great flexibility and accuracy in the operating cycles of any of the engines of the present invention power plants. The one parameter that is not variable, or is not easily made variable, is the ratio of the crankshaft speed of compression cylinders with respect to the crankshaft speed of the combustion or power cylinders. Typically during development of an engine for a power plant in accordance with the present invention, one would test various speed ratios to determine which is the best to use in the intended final power plant. Alternatively, a variable speed drive could be incorporated between those two crankshafts for development purposes, also even with a closed loop control, or in fact, could be used in production of the power plants, should the advantage of being able to vary the speed ratio under various conditions be found to outweigh the additional cost to incorporate such a variable speed drive. Thus the present invention in its various embodiments, including but not limited to those disclosed herein, provides extreme flexibility in the control of the engines in a power plant to provide very high efficiency with long life and ease of maintenance.
In the foregoing description, four cylinder inline block assemblies were used for the exemplary design, though that is not a limitation of the invention. Block assemblies of more or fewer cylinders, of an odd number of cylinders or of a V configuration could be used if desired, though four cylinder inline blocks have the advantage of providing reasonably uniform crankshaft power output, yet are simpler and have fewer parts than block assemblies with greater numbers of cylinders and are more readily packaged in the multiple engine block power plants of the present invention.
Further, while operation of the power plants of the present invention on diesel fuel represents a preferred embodiment, gaseous fuels may also be injected, such as in the intake manifold, and ignited such as by the injection of a diesel fuel when ignition is desired, though direct compression ignition of a gaseous fuel is possible under some operating conditions. Finally, the drawings presented herein of preferred embodiments suggest that the multiple engine block internal combustion power plants of the present invention are all of an overhead valve configuration. While that is not a limitation of the invention, currently there are no electronically controlled engine valve systems for other engine valve configurations, or at least none known that have achieved any significant notoriety, and electronic control of both engine valve timing and injection timing is essential for total enjoyment of the flexibility and advantages of the present invention multiple engine block internal combustion power plants
Thus the present invention has a number of aspects, which aspects may be practiced alone or in various combinations or sub-combinations, as desired. Also while certain preferred embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed and described herein for purposes of exemplary illustration and not for purposes of limitation, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/US2018/024374 filed on Mar. 26, 2018, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/476,378 filed on Mar. 24, 2017, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3811271 | Sprain | May 1974 | A |
4565167 | Bryant | Jan 1986 | A |
4787207 | Kristensen et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
5265564 | Dullaway | Nov 1993 | A |
5460329 | Sturman | Oct 1995 | A |
5526778 | Springer | Jun 1996 | A |
5638781 | Sturman | Jun 1997 | A |
5713316 | Sturman | Feb 1998 | A |
5720261 | Sturman et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5829396 | Sturman | Nov 1998 | A |
5954030 | Sturman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960753 | Sturman | Oct 1999 | A |
5970956 | Sturman | Oct 1999 | A |
6012644 | Sturman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6085991 | Sturman | Jul 2000 | A |
6148778 | Sturman | Nov 2000 | A |
6161770 | Sturman | Dec 2000 | A |
6173685 | Sturman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6257499 | Sturman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270322 | Hoyt | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6308690 | Sturman | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6360728 | Sturman | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6415749 | Sturman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6557506 | Sturman | May 2003 | B2 |
6575126 | Sturman | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6739293 | Turner et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
7025326 | Lammert et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032574 | Sturman | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7108200 | Sturman | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7182068 | Sturman et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7341028 | Klose et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7387095 | Babbitt et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7412969 | Pena et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7565867 | Donnelly et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568632 | Sturman | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7568633 | Sturman | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7694891 | Sturman | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7717359 | Sturman | May 2010 | B2 |
7730858 | Babbitt et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7954472 | Sturman | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8196844 | Kiss et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8282020 | Kiss et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8342153 | Sturman | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366018 | Giordano et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8412441 | Sturman | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8579207 | Sturman | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8628031 | Kiss | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8629745 | Sturman et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8733671 | Sturman | May 2014 | B2 |
9181890 | Sturman | Nov 2015 | B2 |
20020017573 | Sturman | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20060192028 | Kiss | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070007362 | Sturman | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070113906 | Sturman et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070157894 | Scuderi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070245982 | Sturman | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080264393 | Sturman | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090038597 | Phillips | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100012745 | Sturman | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100229838 | Sturman | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100263645 | Scuderi | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120073551 | Branyon | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130261911 | Zanotti | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140147238 | Izumi | May 2014 | A1 |
20140360473 | Sturman | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150354171 | Sakamoto | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20170022882 | Sturman | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105020009 | Nov 2015 | CN |
WO-2016196839 | Dec 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jun. 22, 2018; International Application No. PCT/US2018/024374”, Jun. 22, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200011251 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62476378 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2018/024374 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 16577464 | US |