Multiple-eye, single-display, ultrawide-field-of-view optical see-through augmented reality system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10754156
  • Patent Number
    10,754,156
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 20, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 25, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
An optical system that includes a lens element and a lens element holder. The optical system also includes a display device holder that is configured to hold a display device having a single light-emitting panel. The lens element includes a right-eye reflective surface and a left-eye reflective surface. The right-eye reflective surface includes a first plurality of different surface elements oriented to reflect and collimate light from corresponding different regions of a first portion of the light-emitting panel toward a predetermined right-eye location, and the left-eye reflective surface includes a second plurality of different surface elements oriented to reflect and collimate light from corresponding different regions of a second portion of the light-emitting panel toward a predetermined left-eye location.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The embodiments relate generally to optical systems and, in particular, to a single-display optical see-through augmented reality system.


BACKGROUND

See-through augmented reality systems that provide different imagery to two eyes require two display systems. Using two display systems increases costs and complexity, requires substantial alignment, and reduces reliability.


SUMMARY

The embodiments relate to an augmented reality system that utilizes a single-display system to provide different imagery to two different eyes of a user.


In one embodiment, an optical system is provided. The optical system includes a lens element and a lens element holder that is configured to position the lens element with respect to eyes of the user. The optical system also includes a display device holder that is configured to hold a display device having a single light-emitting panel. The lens element includes a right-eye reflective surface and a left-eye reflective surface. The right-eye reflective surface includes a first plurality of different surface elements oriented to reflect and collimate light from corresponding different regions of a first portion of the light-emitting panel toward a predetermined right-eye location, and the left-eye reflective surface includes a second plurality of different surface elements oriented to reflect and collimate light from corresponding different regions of a second portion of the light-emitting panel toward a predetermined left-eye location. The display device holder is configured to maintain the light-emitting panel in a predetermined position and orientation with respect to the lens element to reflect light emitted from the light-emitting panel from the right-eye reflective surface toward the predetermined right-eye location and the left-eye reflective surface toward the predetermined left-eye location.


In one embodiment, the optical system further includes a support coupled to the lens element holder and the display device holder. The support is configured to be mounted on a helmet.


In one embodiment, the lens element comprises a single lens element. In one embodiment, the right-eye reflective surface and the left-eye reflective surface are each non-symmetrical concave surfaces and join at a center region of the single lens element. In another embodiment, the lens element comprises a first lens element and a second lens element that is separate from the first lens element, and the first lens element comprises the right-eye reflective surface, and the second lens element comprises the left-eye reflective surface.


In one embodiment, the light-emitting panel is configured to concurrently provide left-eye imagery from the first portion of the light-emitting panel and right-eye imagery from the second portion of the light-emitting panel.


In one embodiment, the first plurality of different surface elements oriented to reflect and collimate light from corresponding different regions of the first portion of the light-emitting panel is further oriented to reflect light received from the second portion of the light-emitting panel in a direction other than toward the right eye of the user.


In one embodiment, the display device holder is configured to receive a portable display device. In one embodiment, the display device holder is configured to maintain the light-emitting panel above and in front of the eyes of the user.


In one embodiment, the optical system further comprises a lens element adjustment mechanism that is configured to alter a distance of the lens element from the light-emitting panel.


In one embodiment, the lens element may be partially transparent and partially reflective, such as is implemented by a beam-splitter. The lens element may thus provide a see-through augmented reality mode, wherein eyes of a user can perceive real-world imagery through the lens element in conjunction with imagery reflected from the interior reflective surfaces of the lens element. The lens element may also provide a completely reflective mode, wherein eyes of the user receive only imagery reflected from the interior reflective surfaces of the lens element, which facilitates a completely immersive virtual reality experience.


Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of the embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a plan view of an optical system according to one embodiment;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a plan view of an optical system according to another embodiment;



FIG. 3 is a perspective view illustrating the optical system according to one embodiment;



FIG. 4 is a perspective view illustrating an optical system according to another embodiment; and



FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a side view of the optical system according to one embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The embodiments set forth below represent the information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments and illustrate the best mode of practicing the embodiments. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.


The use herein of ordinals in conjunction with an element is solely for distinguishing what might otherwise be similar or identical labels, such as “first lens element” and “second lens element,” and does not imply a priority, a type, an importance, or other attribute, unless otherwise stated herein. The term “about” used herein in conjunction with a numeric value means any value that is within a range of ten percent greater than or ten percent less than the numeric value.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a plan view of an optical system 10 according to one embodiment. The optical system 10 includes a lens element 12, which has a right-eye reflective surface 14 and a left-eye reflective surface 16. A display device 18 has a single light-emitting panel 20 (hereinafter “light-emitting panel 20”). The phrase “single light-emitting panel” refers to one light-emitting panel that utilizes a single set of drivers and has a single set of driving electronics, such as, for example, is found in a typical smartphone.


The right-eye reflective surface 14 and the left-eye reflective surface 16 are non-rotationally symmetric surfaces, and, in some embodiments, concave surfaces, that are “mapped” to the light-emitting panel 20. In particular, the right-eye reflective surface 14 comprises a first plurality of different surface elements oriented to reflect and collimate light from corresponding regions of a first portion 22 of the light-emitting panel 20 toward a predetermined right-eye location 24. Similarly, the left-eye reflective surface 16 comprises a second plurality of different surface elements oriented to reflect and collimate light from corresponding regions of a second portion 26 of the light-emitting panel 20 toward a predetermined left-eye location 28. Thus, the right-eye reflective surface 14 comprises a surface that comprises multiple, such as thousands, of different surface elements that are mapped to corresponding regions of the first portion 22 of the light-emitting panel 20. Similarly, the left-eye reflective surface 16 comprises a surface that comprises multiple, such as thousands, of different surface elements that are mapped to corresponding regions of the second portion 26 of the light-emitting panel 20.


Such mapping may be implemented, for example, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,781,794 (hereinafter the '794 Patent), the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein. As disclosed in the '794 Patent, non-symmetrical lens surfaces, such as the right-eye reflective surface 14 can be engineered to, among other advantages, increase a field of view (FOV) 30 of a user, such that imagery presented by the light-emitting panel 20 can be reflected from a desired surface element or surface elements of the right-eye reflective surface 14 toward the predetermined right-eye location 24. Such surface elements may overlap one another. In some embodiments, the optical system 10 can provide a 180-degree FOV 30. Such an engineered surface can also effectively shift imagery presented by the first portion 22 toward the predetermined right-eye location 24 in a manner that prevents skewing or other aberrations to a right eye 32.


The light-emitting panel 20 is configured to concurrently provide right-eye imagery 34 from the first portion 22 of the light-emitting panel 20 and left-eye imagery 36 from the second portion 26 of the light-emitting panel 20. The ability for a single light-emitting panel to provide two sets of imagery can be implemented in a number of different ways, including, by way of non-limiting example, via Pinnacle Studio software, available from Corel Corporation, 1600 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Z 8R7, Canada. The use of two sets of imagery facilitates, for example, 3D imagery being presented by the first portion 22 and the second portion 26. The right-eye reflective surface 14 reflects the 3D imagery presented by the first portion 22 to the right eye 32 of the user, and the left-eye reflective surface 16 reflects the 3D imagery presented by the second portion 26 to a left eye 38 of the user.


Note that a center 40 of the light-emitting panel 20 is preferably aligned with a center region 42 of the single lens element 12, wherein the right-eye reflective surface 14 and the left-eye reflective surface 16 join. Due to the engineered right-eye reflective surface 14, a center 44 of the first portion 22 need not align with a center of the right-eye reflective surface 14, nor with the right eye 32. Similarly, due to the engineered left-eye reflective surface 16, a center 46 of the second portion 26 need not align with a center of the left-eye reflective surface 16, nor with the left eye 38. Similarly, a first distance 48 between a center point of the first portion 22 of the light-emitting panel 20 and a center point of the second portion 26 of the light-emitting panel 20 may be less than a second distance 50 between the predetermined right-eye location 24 and the predetermined left-eye location 28.


As an example of the effect of the engineered left-eye reflective surface 16, light 52 may be emitted from a region of the second portion 26 of the light-emitting panel 20. The light 52 is reflected from a surface element located on the left-eye reflective surface 16 in a direction 54 toward the predetermined left-eye location 28. To the left eye 38, the imagery carried in the light 52 may be perceived to be at a location 56. It will be appreciated that the light 52, although illustrated as striking the particular surface element located on the left-eye reflective surface 16, in fact travels in waves and may strike multiple other surface elements on the left-eye reflective surface 16, and indeed may strike all other surface elements on the left-eye reflective surface 16. However, since such other surface elements are oriented to reflect light received from different regions of the second portion 26, the light 52 will be reflected in a direction other than the predetermined left-eye location 28. For example, light 58 emitted from a region of the first portion 22 of the light-emitting panel 20 may strike a surface element of the left-eye reflective surface 16, and is thus reflected in a direction 60 away from the predetermined left-eye location 28.


In some embodiments, the lens element 12 is partially transparent and partially reflective and comprises, for example, a beam splitter. In some embodiments, the right-eye reflective surface 14 and the left-eye reflective surface 16 may be coated with a material, such as chromium, aluminum, or the like, to provide such partially reflective properties. In such embodiments, the optical system 10 may operate in an augmented reality mode, wherein the eyes 32, 38 can view a mixture of real-world environment through the lens element 12 and imagery from the light-emitting panel 20 via one or both of the left-eye reflective surface 16 and the right-eye reflective surface 14. The lens element 12 may also provide a completely reflective mode, wherein the eyes 32, 38 receive only imagery reflected from the reflective surfaces 14, 16, which facilitates a completely immersive virtual reality experience.


In one embodiment, exterior surfaces 61 of the lens element 12 may be coated with an anti-reflective (AR) coating. The use of an AR coating may substantially reduce double-imaging that may occur in certain circumstances, wherein some light emitted by the light-emitting panel 20 passes through the interior reflective surfaces 14, 16 and is reflected back by the exterior surfaces 61 toward the eyes 32, 38. The use of an AR coating on the exterior surfaces 61 can cause some, or all, of such light to pass through the lens element 12 rather than reflect back toward the eyes 32, 38. The AR coating may comprise any suitable coating, such as, by way of non-limiting example, a dielectric such as silicon dioxide, and the like.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a plan view of an optical system 10-1 according to another embodiment. The optical system 10-1 operates substantially similarly to the optical system 10, except in this embodiment a first lens element 12-1A comprises the right-eye reflective surface 14, and a second lens element 12-1B comprises the left-eye reflective surface 16. The first lens element 12-1A and the second lens element 12-1B may be moved different distances from one another to accommodate different distances 50 between the eyes 32, 38 of different users. This interpupillary distance adjustment can also be facilitated by having different sized lenses computed and constructed for users having different sized heads, and may also be adjusted by shifting the imagery to the left and right in opposite eyes. The imagery may be displaced closer to the nose for users having eyes closer together, or displaced away from the nose for users having wider-spaced eyes.



FIG. 3 is a perspective view illustrating the optical system 10, according to one embodiment. The optical system 10 may include a lens element holder 62 configured to position the lens element 12 with respect to eyes of the user. The optical system 10 may also include a display device holder 64 configured to hold the display device 18 (FIG. 1) having the light-emitting panel 20. The display device holder 64 is configured to maintain the light-emitting panel 20 in a predetermined position and orientation with respect to the lens element 12 to reflect light emitted from the light-emitting panel 20 from the right-eye reflective surface 14 toward the predetermined right-eye location 24 and from the left-eye reflective surface 16 toward the predetermined left-eye location 28. The display device holder 64 may also be configured to maintain the light-emitting panel 20 above and in front of the eyes of the user. The optical system 10 may also include a support 66 that is coupled to the lens element holder 62 and the display device holder 64, which is configured to be mounted on a helmet 68.


The optical system 10 may also include a lens element adjustment mechanism 70 that is configured to alter a distance of the lens element 12 from the light-emitting panel 20, and/or the eyes of the user, for focusing and alignment purposes.



FIG. 4 is a perspective view illustrating an optical system 10-2, according to one embodiment. The optical system 10-2 is substantially similar to the optical system 10-1, except in this embodiment a display device holder 64-1 is configured to receive a portable display device 18-1, such as a smartphone or computing tablet.



FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a side view of the optical system 10, according to one embodiment. The second portion 26 of the light-emitting panel 20 emits light 74-1-74-N from a plurality of different regions 76-1-76-N (generally, regions 76) of the second portion 26. A region 76 may comprise, for example, a pixel, or a group of pixels. Corresponding surface elements 78-1-78-N (generally, surface elements 78) on the left-eye reflective surface 16 (FIG. 1) have each been mapped to the regions 76. A surface element 78 may comprise, for example, a particular area size on the left-eye reflective surface 16.


Each surface element 78 both collimates and reflects the corresponding light 74 toward the predetermined left-eye location 28. While for purposes of illustration only five regions 76 and five surface elements 78 are depicted, it will be appreciated that depending on the imagery, the size of the regions 76, and the size of the surface elements 78, light 74 may be emitted from tens or hundreds of thousands of different regions 76 and collimated and reflected by corresponding tens or hundreds of thousands of different surface elements 78 toward the predetermined left-eye location 28.


While the precise parameters of the optical system 10 may differ depending on the application, or the second distance 50 between the predetermined right- and left-eye locations 24, 28 (FIG. 1), in one embodiment, the display device holder 64 (FIG. 3) maintains the light-emitting panel 20 at an approximately 48-degree angle 80 with respect to horizontal. A distance 82 between a base of the light-emitting panel 20 and the bottom of the lens element 12 is about 62.8 millimeters (mm). A distance 84 between the base of the lens element 12 and a vertical line extending from the base of the light-emitting panel 20 is about 39.8 mm.


Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the preferred embodiments of the disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. An optical system comprising: a lens element;a lens element holder configured to position the lens element with respect to eyes of a user;a display device having a single light-emitting panel;a display device holder configured to hold the display device, the light-emitting panel configured to concurrently provide left-eye imagery from a first portion of the light-emitting panel and right-eye imagery from a second portion of the light-emitting panel;wherein the lens element comprises a right-eye reflective surface and a left-eye reflective surface, the right-eye reflective surface comprising a first plurality of different surface elements oriented to receive light directly from the first portion of the light-emitting panel with no intervening elements between the first portion of the light-emitting panel and the right-eye reflective surface, and to reflect and collimate light from corresponding different regions of the first portion of the light-emitting panel directly to a predetermined right-eye location and the left-eye reflective surface comprising a second plurality of different surface elements oriented to receive light directly from the second portion of the light-emitting panel with no intervening elements between the second portion of the light-emitting panel and the left-eye reflective surface, and to reflect and collimate light from corresponding different regions of the second portion of the light-emitting panel directly to a predetermined left-eye location;wherein a center of the first portion of the light-emitting panel is not aligned with a center of the right-eye reflective surface and neither the center of the first portion of the light-emitting panel nor the center of the right-eye reflective surface are aligned with the predetermined right-eye location, and the first plurality of different surface elements of the right-eye reflective surface is configured to correct for image skew of an image depicted by the first portion of the light-emitting panel and reflected toward the predetermined right-eye location; andwherein the second plurality of different surface elements of the left-eye reflective surface is configured to correct for image skew of an image depicted by the second portion of the light-emitting panel and reflected toward the predetermined left-eye location;wherein a first distance between a center point of the first portion of the light-emitting panel and a center point of the second portion of the light-emitting panel is different from a second distance between the predetermined right-eye location and the predetermined left-eye location.
  • 2. The optical system of claim 1, wherein the display device holder is configured to maintain the light-emitting panel in a predetermined position and orientation with respect to the lens element to reflect light emitted from the light-emitting panel from the right-eye reflective surface toward the predetermined right-eye location and the left-eye reflective surface toward the predetermined left-eye location.
  • 3. The optical system of claim 1, wherein the optical system further comprises a support coupled to the lens element holder and the display device holder, the support configured to be mounted on a helmet.
  • 4. The optical system of claim 3, further comprising the helmet, wherein the support is mounted on the helmet.
  • 5. The optical system of claim 1, wherein the lens element comprises a single lens element.
  • 6. The optical system of claim 1, wherein the right-eye reflective surface and the left-eye reflective surface are each non-symmetrical concave surfaces and join at a center region of the lens element.
  • 7. The optical system of claim 1, wherein the lens element comprises a first lens element and a second lens element that is separate from the first lens element, the first lens element comprising the right-eye reflective surface and the second lens element comprising the left-eye reflective surface.
  • 8. The optical system of claim 1, wherein the second distance is greater than the first distance.
  • 9. The optical system of claim 1, wherein the first plurality of different surface elements oriented to reflect and collimate light from corresponding different regions of the first portion of the light-emitting panel is further oriented to reflect light received from the second portion of the light-emitting panel in a direction other than toward the right eye of the user.
  • 10. The optical system of claim 1, wherein the display device holder is configured to receive a portable display device.
  • 11. The optical system of claim 1, wherein the display device holder is configured to maintain the light-emitting panel above and in front of the eyes of the user.
  • 12. The optical system of claim 1, wherein the optical system further comprises a support coupled to the lens element holder and the display device holder, and further comprising a lens element adjustment mechanism that is configured to, in response to user manipulation, alter a distance of the lens element from the light-emitting panel and the eyes of the user.
  • 13. The optical system of claim 1, wherein the lens element is a partially transparent and partially reflective lens element.
  • 14. The optical system of claim 1, wherein the lens element comprises a beam splitter.
  • 15. The optical system of claim 1, wherein the lens element comprises a right-eye exterior surface and a left-eye exterior surface, and further comprising an anti-reflective coating disposed on the right-eye exterior surface and the left-eye exterior surface.
  • 16. An optical system consisting of: a lens element;a lens element holder configured to position the lens element with respect to eyes of a user;a display device holder configured to hold a display device having a single light-emitting panel;a support coupled to the lens element holder and the display device holder, and further comprising a lens element adjustment mechanism that is configured to, in response to user manipulation, alter a distance of the lens element from the light-emitting panel and the eyes of the user; andwherein the lens element comprises a right-eye reflective surface and a left-eye reflective surface, the right-eye reflective surface comprising a first plurality of different surface elements oriented to reflect and collimate light from corresponding different regions of a first portion of the light-emitting panel directly to a predetermined right-eye location and the left-eye reflective surface comprising a second plurality of different surface elements oriented to reflect and collimate light from corresponding different regions of a second portion of the light-emitting panel directly to a predetermined left-eye location.
US Referenced Citations (233)
Number Name Date Kind
3880509 Herndon Apr 1975 A
4026641 Bosserman et al. May 1977 A
4176468 Marty, Jr. Dec 1979 A
4293196 Hilbert Oct 1981 A
4406532 Howlett Sep 1983 A
H423 Mohon et al. Feb 1988 H
5184250 Lacroix Feb 1993 A
5253116 Lacroix Oct 1993 A
5309169 Lippert May 1994 A
5325386 Jewell et al. Jun 1994 A
5347400 Hunter Sep 1994 A
5388990 Beckman Feb 1995 A
5436763 Chen et al. Jul 1995 A
5561538 Kato et al. Oct 1996 A
5572343 Okamura et al. Nov 1996 A
5581271 Kraemer Dec 1996 A
5641288 Zaenglein, Jr. Jun 1997 A
5699194 Takahashi Dec 1997 A
5701132 Kollin et al. Dec 1997 A
5701202 Takahashi Dec 1997 A
5712649 Tosaki Jan 1998 A
5714967 Okamura et al. Feb 1998 A
5715094 Ansley et al. Feb 1998 A
5754344 Fujiyama May 1998 A
5757544 Tabata et al. May 1998 A
5774268 Takahashi Jun 1998 A
5798738 Yamada Aug 1998 A
5798739 Teitel Aug 1998 A
5803738 Latham Sep 1998 A
5834676 Elliott Nov 1998 A
5844530 Tosaki Dec 1998 A
5936663 Tabata et al. Aug 1999 A
5982343 Iba et al. Nov 1999 A
5999147 Teitel Dec 1999 A
6038387 Machida Mar 2000 A
6140979 Gerhard et al. Oct 2000 A
6140980 Spitzer et al. Oct 2000 A
6160666 Rallison Dec 2000 A
6185045 Hanano Feb 2001 B1
6201646 Togino et al. Mar 2001 B1
6215593 Bruce Apr 2001 B1
6266194 Tanijiri et al. Jul 2001 B1
6347869 Xu et al. Feb 2002 B1
6407724 Waldern et al. Jun 2002 B2
6445362 Tegreene Sep 2002 B1
6504658 Bignolles et al. Jan 2003 B1
6522474 Cobb et al. Feb 2003 B2
6529331 Massof et al. Mar 2003 B2
6549332 Kimura Apr 2003 B2
6611253 Cohen Aug 2003 B1
6633304 Anabuki et al. Oct 2003 B2
6646811 Inoguchi Nov 2003 B2
6704128 Takeyama et al. Mar 2004 B2
6731434 Hua et al. May 2004 B1
6751026 Tomono Jun 2004 B2
6771423 Geist Aug 2004 B2
6788442 Potin et al. Sep 2004 B1
6795042 Nagata et al. Sep 2004 B1
6813085 Richards Nov 2004 B2
6829087 Freese et al. Dec 2004 B2
6873471 Coates et al. Mar 2005 B2
6919866 Kanevsky et al. Jul 2005 B2
6919867 Sauer Jul 2005 B2
6963379 Tomono Nov 2005 B2
7002551 Azuma et al. Feb 2006 B2
7009773 Chaoulov et al. Mar 2006 B2
7016116 Dolgoff Mar 2006 B2
7063256 Anderson et al. Jun 2006 B2
7068444 Nishi Jun 2006 B2
7072096 Holman et al. Jul 2006 B2
7088516 Yagi et al. Aug 2006 B2
7095562 Peng et al. Aug 2006 B1
7110013 Ebersole et al. Sep 2006 B2
7119965 Rolland et al. Oct 2006 B1
7151639 Lung Dec 2006 B2
7295377 Edelmann Nov 2007 B2
7307791 Li et al. Dec 2007 B2
7324081 Friedrich et al. Jan 2008 B2
7339742 Amitai et al. Mar 2008 B2
7385600 Marion Jun 2008 B2
7391573 Amitai Jun 2008 B2
7407106 Yee et al. Aug 2008 B2
7432879 Schonlau Oct 2008 B2
7446941 Fukuda Nov 2008 B2
7499217 Cakmakci et al. Mar 2009 B2
7545571 Garoutte et al. Jun 2009 B2
7547101 Fuziak, Jr. Jun 2009 B2
7573525 Yamasaki Aug 2009 B2
7605773 Janssen Oct 2009 B2
7613356 Uchiyama et al. Nov 2009 B2
7623294 Harada et al. Nov 2009 B2
7626562 Iwasaki Dec 2009 B2
7656585 Powell et al. Feb 2010 B1
7663793 Doucet Feb 2010 B1
7732694 Rosenberg Jun 2010 B2
7751122 Amitai Jul 2010 B2
7765083 Zank et al. Jul 2010 B2
7804507 Yang et al. Sep 2010 B2
7812815 Banerjee et al. Oct 2010 B2
7843403 Spitzer Nov 2010 B2
7928927 Krenz et al. Apr 2011 B1
7949295 Kumar et al. May 2011 B2
7965868 Roberts et al. Jun 2011 B2
8046719 Skourup et al. Oct 2011 B2
8059342 Burke Nov 2011 B2
8320217 Barger et al. Nov 2012 B1
8625200 Smith Jan 2014 B2
8678282 Black et al. Mar 2014 B1
8766879 Fujikawa et al. Jul 2014 B2
8781794 Harrison et al. Jul 2014 B2
8884845 Yamazaki et al. Nov 2014 B2
8928558 Lewis et al. Jan 2015 B2
8964298 Haddick et al. Feb 2015 B2
9384594 Maciocci et al. Jul 2016 B2
9551873 Zalewski Jan 2017 B2
20010033401 Kasai et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010043163 Waldern et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020036649 Kim et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020047987 Massengill et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020094189 Navab et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020163486 Ronzani et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020181115 Massof et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020186179 Knowles Dec 2002 A1
20020196554 Cobb et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030184868 Geist Oct 2003 A1
20040008157 Brubaker et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040070839 Yagi et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040130783 Solomon Jul 2004 A1
20040174599 Dietrich Sep 2004 A1
20050046953 Repetto et al. Mar 2005 A1
20060072215 Nishi Apr 2006 A1
20060103590 Divon May 2006 A1
20060227067 Iwasaki Oct 2006 A1
20060281061 Hightower et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070020587 Seymore et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070097277 Hong et al. May 2007 A1
20070132785 Ebersole, Jr. et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070177275 McGuire, Jr. Aug 2007 A1
20070219760 Yang et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070236800 Cakmakci et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070242131 Sanz-Pastor et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070243916 Lee Oct 2007 A1
20070248283 Mack et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070273983 Hebert Nov 2007 A1
20080007181 Pickering Jan 2008 A1
20080063400 Hudson et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071559 Arrasvuori Mar 2008 A1
20080123049 Volk May 2008 A1
20080130309 Condon et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080198459 Fergason Aug 2008 A1
20080204731 Williams Aug 2008 A1
20080309586 Vitale Dec 2008 A1
20090002574 Sorek et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090015735 Simmonds Jan 2009 A1
20090040308 Temovskiy Feb 2009 A1
20090112469 Lapidot et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090122385 Hilton May 2009 A1
20090153437 Aharoni Jun 2009 A1
20090173788 Moraites et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090174589 Moraites Jul 2009 A1
20090190003 Park et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090228251 Cakmakci et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090238378 Kikinis et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100002154 Hua Jan 2010 A1
20100018285 Murphy et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100020643 Barger et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100060551 Sugiyama et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100103075 Kalaboukis et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100103196 Kumar et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100149073 Chaum et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100165430 Buschbeck Jul 2010 A1
20100171680 Lapidot et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100175685 Campbell et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100214635 Sasaki et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100238161 Varga et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100245387 Bachelder et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100254001 Jang Oct 2010 A1
20100277575 Ismael et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100279255 Williams, II Nov 2010 A1
20100321409 Komori et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110018903 Lapstun et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110057863 Sugihara et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110130636 Daniel et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110202306 Eng et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110213664 Osterhout et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110214082 Osterhout et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110216060 Weising et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110221656 Haddick et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110221657 Haddick et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110221658 Haddick et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110221659 King, III et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110221668 Haddick et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110221669 Shams et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110221670 King, III et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110221671 King, III et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110221672 Osterhout et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110221793 King, III et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110221896 Haddick et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110221897 Haddick et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110222745 Osterhout et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110225536 Shams et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110227812 Haddick et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110227813 Haddick et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110227820 Haddick et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110228403 Masuda et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110231757 Haddick et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110250962 Feiner et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110283865 Collins Nov 2011 A1
20110289810 D'Souza et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120050144 Morlock Mar 2012 A1
20120068913 Bar-Zeev et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120120498 Harrison et al. May 2012 A1
20120120499 Harrison et al. May 2012 A1
20120123742 Harrison May 2012 A1
20120154920 Harrison et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120204307 De Maffei et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120212400 Border et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120242695 Martin Sep 2012 A1
20120274775 Reiffel Nov 2012 A1
20120326948 Crocco et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130016123 Skarulis Jan 2013 A1
20130021224 Fujikawa et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130163090 Yu Jun 2013 A1
20140002677 Schinker Jan 2014 A1
20140104274 Hilliges et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140152531 Murray Jun 2014 A1
20140182659 Davis et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140266987 Magyari Sep 2014 A1
20150103152 Qin Apr 2015 A1
20150177516 Blonde et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150178992 Bhuruth Jun 2015 A1
20150260474 Rublowsky et al. Sep 2015 A1
20160187969 Larsen et al. Jun 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (43)
Number Date Country
2750287 Nov 2011 CA
2750287 Nov 2011 CA
103261944 Aug 2013 CN
102007009828 Sep 2008 DE
1418458 Dec 2004 EP
2624238 Jul 2013 EP
2461907 Jan 2010 GB
55-164801 Dec 1980 JP
02-032301 Feb 1990 JP
05-303054 Nov 1993 JP
H07134266 May 1995 JP
H07225790 Aug 1995 JP
H07244246 Sep 1995 JP
H08190072 Jul 1996 JP
08-278476 Oct 1996 JP
10-080575 Mar 1998 JP
10-206786 Aug 1998 JP
2000047138 Feb 2000 JP
2002287077 Oct 2002 JP
2006039359 Feb 2006 JP
2006091477 Apr 2006 JP
2008058461 Mar 2008 JP
2008529064 Jul 2008 JP
2009069364 Apr 2009 JP
2009232133 Oct 2009 JP
2010019874 Jan 2010 JP
2010020065 Jan 2010 JP
2010517090 May 2010 JP
2011133633 Jul 2011 JP
10-0292015 Mar 2001 KR
I244318 Nov 2005 TW
201326895 Jul 2013 TW
9722964 Jun 1997 WO
2005017729 Feb 2005 WO
2008051578 May 2008 WO
2009066408 May 2009 WO
2009094643 Jul 2009 WO
2010047212 Apr 2010 WO
2010123934 Oct 2010 WO
2011114149 Sep 2011 WO
2012052980 Apr 2012 WO
2012052981 Apr 2012 WO
2012083042 Jun 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (209)
Entry
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180067287.4, dated Feb. 4, 2015, 11 pages.
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180067287.4, dated Oct. 10, 2015, 9 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 11806088.8, dated Oct. 27, 2015, 3 pages.
Notification of Reason(s) for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2013-544784, dated Aug. 17, 2015, 9 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Jun. 15, 2015, 23 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Sep. 21, 2015, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217, dated May 21, 2015, 12 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217, dated Oct. 8, 2015, 15 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217, dated Jan. 4, 2016, 3 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Feb. 2, 2016, 15 pages.
Unknown, “Optical head-mounted display,” Wikipedia, last modified Feb. 25, 2016, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_head-mounted_display, 18 pages.
Hua, Hong, “Past and future of wearable augmented reality displays and their applications,” SPIE Proceedings, vol. 9186, Oct. 20, 2014, SPIE, pp. 91860O-1 to 91860O-12.
Olwal, Alex, et al., “ASTOR: An Autostereoscopic Optical See-through Augmented Reality System,” Proceedings of be Fourth IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Oct. 5-8, 2005, Vienna, Austria, IEEE, pp. 24-27.
Rolland, Jannick, P., “Wide-angle, off-axis, see-through head-mounted display,” Optical Engineering, vol. 39, Issue 7, Jul. 1, 2000, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, pp. 1760-1767.
Notice of Allowance and Search Report for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 100148681, dated Mar. 14, 2016, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/055918, dated Jan. 27, 2016, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,444, dated Jul. 3, 2017, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/884,975, dated Jul. 12, 2017, 45 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated Jun. 26, 2017, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/142,380, dated Jun. 27, 2017, 19 pages.
Decision to Grant a Patent for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-534454, dated Oct. 18, 2017, 6 pages.
Notification of Reexamination for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180067287.4, dated Sep. 5, 2017, 10 pages.
Decision to Grant a Patent for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-544784, dated Oct. 18, 2017, 6 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/058,739, dated Sep. 13, 2017, 16 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/020444, dated Sep. 14, 2017, 8 pages.
Amery, John G., et al., “Flight Simulation Visual Requirements and a New Display System,” Cockpit Displays VI: Displays for Defense Applications, Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 3690, Aug. 16, 1999, 16 pages.
Author Unknown, “ABI Research Anticipates ‘Dramatic Growth’ for Augmented Reality via Smartphones,” Human-Machine Technology Research Service, ABI Research, Oct. 22, 2009, 1 page.
Author Unknown, “VST-2200FL Flight Simulator,” Virtual SimTech, 2013, http://www.virtualsimtech.com/flightsimulators.htm, 2 pages.
Author Unknown, “Head Mounted Displays from INITION,” Retrieved from http://www.inition.co.uk/3D-Technologies/productsection/31, Accessed on Dec. 30, 2011, 4 pages.
Author Unknown, “Immersive Displays: Powerwall, CAVE, Headmounted Displays (HMD),” InterSense Applications, Downloaded at http://www.intersense.com/categories/11/, Accessed on Mar. 7, 2011, InterSense Incorporated, 3 pages.
Author Unknown, “Lumus—Consumer Market Products,” Retrieved from http://www.lumus-optical.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9&1temid=15, Accessed on Dec. 30, 2011, Lumus Ltd., 4 pages.
Author Unknown, “SEOS Ultra Wide Field-of-View Head Mounted Display,” SEOS HMD 120/40, Product Specifications, Retrieved from http://cgsd.com/SEOSHMD/, Accessed on Oct. 31, 2013, SEOS Displays Ltd., 3 pages.
Author Unknown, “Vuzix High Resolution Video Eyewear: The Future of Big Screen Viewing on the Gol,” Vuzix Products, Retrieved from http://www.vuzix.com/consumer, Retrieved Dec. 30, 2011, Vuzix, 2 pages.
Ayras et al., “Near-To-Eye Display Based on Retinal Scanning and a Diffractive Exitpupil Expander,” Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Apr. 12-15, 2010, vol. 7723, No. 77230V, SPIE, 8 pages.
Azuma et al., “Improving Static and Dynamic Registration in an Optical See-through HMD,” Computer Graphics: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1994, Annual Conference Series, Orlando, Florida, Jul. 24-29, 1994, pp. 197-204.
Bayer et al., “Chapter 3: Introduction to Helmet-Mounted Displays,” Excerpt from Helmet-Mounted Displays: Sensation, Perception and Cognition Issues, U.S. Army Medical Department, Medical Research and Material Command, USAARL, 2009, 65 pages.
Billinghurst et al., “Collaboration with Tangible Augmented Reality Interfaces,” Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Aug. 2001, vol. 1, 5 pages.
Cakmakci et al., “Meshfree Approximation Methods for Free-Form Surface Representation in Optical Design With Applications to Head-Worn Displays,” Proceedings of the SPIE, Aug. 2008, vol. 7061, SPIE, 15 pages.
Cakmakci et al., “Optical Free-Form Surfaces in Off-Axis Head-Worn Display Design,” Mixed and Augmented Reality, 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium, Mar. 2008, pp. 29-32.
Dejong, C. Dean, “Full-Color, See-Through, Daylight-Readable, Goggle-Mounted Display,” Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Apr. 28, 2011, vol. 8041, SPIE, 13 pages.
Feiner, Steven, et al., “MARS—Mobile Augmented Reality Systems,” Columbia University, Computer Graphics and User Interfaces Lab, Downloaded at http://graphics.cs.columbia.edu/projects/mars/, Accessed on Mar. 7, 2011, 4 pages.
Ferscha et al., “Wearable Displays-for Everyone!”, Pervasive Computing, Jan.-Mar. 2010, vol. 9, No. 1, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 7-10.
Haun, Bzur, “Gartner: Mobility market will reach $1 trillion by 2014,” Mobility Management News and Blogs, Visage Mobile, Oct. 21, 2010, 2 pages.
Hastings, A., “Eye Box Performance Parameters for Non Pupil Forming. Head/Helmet Mounted Displays,” Tutorial, OPT 521, Dec. 6, 2006, www.optics.arizona.edu/optomech/ .. ./tutorials/HastingsTutorial1.doc, 6 pages.
Henderson, Steve, et al., “Augmented Reality for Maintenance and Repair (ARMAR),” Columbia University, Computer Graphics and User Interfaces Lab, Downloaded at http://graphics.cs.columbia.edu/projects/armar/, Jul. 2007, 4 pages.
Holden, Windsor, “A New Reality for Mobile,” Whitepaper, Juniper Research Limited, Feb. 2011, 5 pages.
Hopkins et al., “Simple Thin Lens Optical Systems,” US Department of Defense, Military Standardization Handbook: Optical Design, MIL-HDBK-141, Oct. 5, 1962, FSC-6650, Section 7, http://www.optics.arizona.edu/opti510I/references/mil-hdbk-141 /ch7_12.pdf, 20 pages.
Jeon et al., “Mosaicing a Wide Geometric Field of View for Effective Interaction in Augmented Reality,” Mixed and Augmented Reality, 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium, Mar. 2007, pp. 265-266.
Kato et al., “Marker Tracking and HMD Calibration for a Video-based Augmented Reality Conferencing System,” Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality, Oct. 1999, San Francisco, California, 10 pages.
Kato et al., “Virtual Object Manipulation on a Table-Top AR Environment,” 2000, 9 pages.
Kiyokawa, Kiyoshi, “A Wide Field-of-View Head Mounted Projective Display Using Hyperbolic Half-Silvered Mirrors,” IEEE, Nov. 16, 2007, Cybermedia Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Klepper, Sebastian, “Augmented Reality—Display Systems,” Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany, Jul. 4, 2007, http://campar.in.tum.de/twiki/pub/Chair/TeachingSs07 ArProseminar/1_Display- Systems_Klepper_Report.pdf.
Kurze et al., “Smart Glasses: An Open Environment for AR Apps,” 2010 9th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Science & Technology Papers, Oct. 13-16, 2010, Seoul, South Korea, p. 313.
Lingley et al., “A Single-Pixel Wireless Contact Lens Display,” J. Micromech. Microeng., 21 (2011) 125014 (8pp); doi:1 0.1 088/0960-1317/21/12/125014; Nov. 22, 2011, Received Jun. 9, 2011, in final form Sep. 19, 2011.
Liu et al., “An Optical See-Through Head Mounted Display with Addressable Focal Planes,” IEEE Int'l Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Sep. 15-18, 2008, Cambridge, UK.
Livingston et al., “An Augmented Reality System for Military Operations in Urban Terrain,” Proc of I/ITSEC '02, Orlando, FL, Dec. 2-5, 2002.
McClernon, Chris et al., “PC-Based Desktop Display versus Immersive Head-Mounted Display Flight Simulator Performance,” Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), Dec. 2006, http://www.iitsecdocs.com, 7 pages.
Melzer et al., “Guidelines for HMD Design,” in Helmet-Mounted Displays: Sensation, Perception and Cognition Issues, C. E. Rash et al., ed., U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, Fort Rucker, AL, 2009, Chapter 17, http://www.usaarl.army.mil/publications/hmd_book09/files/Section%2026%20-%20Chapter17%20Guidelines%20for%20HMD%20design.pdf.
Melzer, James E., “Head-Mounted Displays,” The Avionics Handbook, Cary R. Spitzer, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton Florida, 2001, Chapter 5, http://www.davi.ws/avionics/TheAvionicsHandbook_Cap_5.pdf.
Mori et al., “A Wide-View Parallax-Free Eye-Mark Recorder with a Hyperboloidal Half-Silvered Mirror and Appearance-Based Gaze Estimation,” Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions, Aug. 26, 2010, p. 1, vol. PP, No. 99.
Mukawa et al., “A Full Color Eyewear Display Using Holographic Planar Waveguides,” IDW'08—Proceedings of the 15th International Display Workshops, Dec. 3-5, 2008, vol. 1, pp. 259-262, Inst. of Image Information and Television Engineers.
Mukawa et al., “A Full-Color Eyewear Display Using Planar Waveguides with Reflection Volume Holograms,” Journal of the Society for Information Display, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 185-193, Mar. 2009, Society for Information Display.
Nagahara et al., “Super Wide Viewer Using Catadioptric Optics,” Proc. ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST2003), Oct. 2003, pp. 169-175, Osaka, Japan.
Nagahara et al., “Wide Field of View Catadioptrical Head-Mounted Display,” Proc. of 2003 IEEE/RSJ, Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Las Vegas NV, Oct. 2003, pp. 3738-3743.
Nagahara et al., “Wide Field of View Head Mounted Display for Tele-Presence with an Omnidirectional Image Sensor,” Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, Jun. 16-22, 2003, vol. 7, 6 pages.
Okuma et al., “An Augmented Reality System Using a Real-Time Vision Based Registration,” Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Aug. 16-20, 1998, p. 1226, vol. 2.
Parviz, Babak A., “Augmented Reality in a Contact Lens,” IEEE Spectrum, Sep. 2009, http://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/bionics/augmented-reality-in-a-contact-lens/0.
Perey, Christine, et al., “Where's the Money? Mobile AR Revenue Streams,” Mobile AR Summit Position Paper, Downloaded at http://www.perey.com/MobileARSummit/PEREY-Mobile%20AR-Revenue-Streams.pdf, Feb. 9, 2010, 4 pages.
Pratt, P. D., “Advanced Helmet Sight Reticle Assembly (AHRA),” Jul. 1976, p. 364, Honeywell Inc., Minneapolis Minn. Systems and Reresearch Div.
Rolland et al., “Development of Head-Mounted Projection Displays for Distributed, Collaborative, Augmented Reality Applications,” Oct. 2005, Presence, vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 528-549.
Rolland et al., “Invited Paper: Head-Worn Displays—Lens Design,” 48th Annual SID Symposium, Seminar, and Exhibition 2010, Display Week 2010, May 23-28, 2010, vol. 2, pp. 855-858, Society for Information Display.
Rose, Melinda, “Microdisplays: Coming Soon to an Eye Near You?”, Photonics Spectra, Sep. 2008, vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 68-69, Laurin Publishing Co. Inc.
Schonlau et al., “Personal Viewer: A Wide-Field Low-Profile See-Through Eyewear Display,” Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Apr. 14-16, 2004, vol. 5443, No. 1, pp. 277-287, Orlando, FL, SPIE—Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.
Schwald et al., “An Augmented Reality System for Training and Assistance to Maintenance in the Industrial Context,” Journal of WSCG, Feb. 3-7, 2003, vol. 11, No. 1, Plzen, Czech Republic.
Spitzer et al., “Video I/0 Interface for Wearable Computers,” Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 3689, pp. 278-283, 1999, Conference: Helmet-and Head-Mounted Displays IV, Apr. 5-6, 1999, Orlando, FL, SPIE—Int. Soc. Opt. Eng, USA.
Debevec, Paul, et al., “A Lighting Reproduction Approach to Live-Action Compositing,” Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH), Jul. 21-26, 2002, San Antonio, Texas, ACM, pp. 1-10.
Waese, Jamie, “SIGGRAPH paper: Infrared Chroma Key,” waese.com/infrared-chroma-key/, 2015, Jamie Waese, pp. 1-3.
Decision of Final Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-534453, dated Jul. 26, 2016, 5 pages.
Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Patent Application No. 2015249168, dated Jun. 27, 2016, 3 pages.
Notification of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-534454, dated Jun. 1, 2016, 13 pages.
Notification of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-544784, dated May 31, 2016, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/884,975, dated Sep. 9, 2016, 30 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/501,509, dated Jul. 15, 2016, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/020444, dated Jun. 14, 2016, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/303,607, dated Mar. 20, 2014, 23 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/303,607, dated Oct. 9, 2014, 27 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/304,780 dated Jan. 30, 2013, 13 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/304,780, dated Aug. 15, 2013, 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/304,780, dated Nov. 8, 2013, 15 pages.
Second Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/004453, dated Jan. 19, 2017, 6 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2011/055820, dated May 2, 2013, 8 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 11806088.8, dated Dec. 7, 2016, 5 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/884,975, dated Feb. 8, 2017, 36 pages.
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/057731, dated Dec. 19, 2016, 12 pages.
Decision of Final Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-534454, dated Mar. 31, 2017, 11 pages.
Decision of Final Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-544784, dated Mar. 31, 2017, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Mar. 28, 2017, 4 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/884,975, dated Apr. 21, 2017, 3 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/058,739, dated May 23, 2017, 9 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/055918, dated Apr. 27, 2017, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217, dated Mar. 24, 2017, 12 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 11815631.4, dated Apr. 13, 2016, 11 pages.
Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180067287.4, dated Apr. 12, 2016, 10 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Jul. 11, 2016, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217, dated Jun. 2, 2016, 18 pages.
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/004453, dated Oct. 12, 2016, 3 pages.
Notice of Acceptance for Australian Patent Application No. 2015249168, dated Nov. 4, 2016, 2 pages.
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/004454, dated Oct. 12, 2016, 3 pages.
Decision of Rejection for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180067287.4, dated Oct. 17, 2016, 14 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Nov. 7, 2016, 3 pages.
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Nov. 17, 2016, 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Nov. 23, 2016, 9 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217, dated Nov. 30, 2016, 24 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/884,975, dated Dec. 11, 2017, 45 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/058,739, dated Nov. 30, 2017, 8 pages.
Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/058,739, dated Dec. 7, 2017, 5 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated Dec. 22, 2017, 17 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/142,380, dated Nov. 3, 2017, 27 pages.
Notification of Reason for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-229136, dated Oct. 30, 2017, 5 pages.
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,815,461, dated Oct. 26, 2017, 4 pages.
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,821,401, dated Oct. 17, 2017, 4 pages.
Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-701735, dated Oct. 30, 2017, 10 pages.
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,815,452, dated Oct. 31, 2017, 4 pages.
Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7013039, dated Dec. 18, 2017, 9 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 11815630.6, dated Dec. 13, 2017, 6 pages.
Takeda et al., “Design and Implementation of a Wide Field-of-View Head Mounted Projective Display,” Journal of the Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, Jun. 2009, pp. 794-800, vol. 63, No. 6, Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, Osaka, Japan.
Takeda et al., “Poster: A Virtual Walkthrough System with a Wide Field-of-View Stereo Head Mounted Projective Display,” 3D User Interfaces, IEEE Symposium, Mar. 14-15, 2009, p. 149, Lafayette, LA.
Upton et al., “Eyeglass Head-Up Display [Vibrating Fiber Optic Assembly,” 1981 SID International Symposium, Digest of Papers, Apr. 28-30, 1981, vol. XII, pp. 48-49, New York, NY, SID, Los Angeles, CA.
Vanden Brook, T., “Device Helps Pinpoint Snipers: Technology is Critical for U.S. Combat Troops,” USA Today, Wednesday, Mar. 2, 2011.
Von Waldkirch et al., “Spectacle-Based Design of Wearable See-Through Display for Accommodation-Free Viewing,” Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing, (Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. vol. 3001 ), Apr. 18-23, 2004, pp. 106-123, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
Wang, Robert Y. et al., “Real-time hand-tracking with a color glove,” retrieved Dec. 16, 2014 from http://people.csail.mit.edu/rywang/hand/, 3 pages.
Yang et al., “Hybrid Diffractive-Refractive 67 degree-Diagonal Field of View Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Display,” Institute of Modem Optics, Aug. 17, 2005, pp. 351-355, vol. 116, No. 7, Optik—Internat, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Yavrucuk, I. et al., “A Low Cost Flight Simulator Using Virtual Reality Tools,” IEEE Aerospace and Electronics Systems Magazine, vol. 26, Issue 4, Apr. 2011, IEEE, pp. 10-14.
International Search Report for PCT/IB2011/055824 dated May 16, 2012, 4 pages.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/IB2011/055824 dated May 2, 2013, 5 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/IB2011/055824 dated May 2, 2013, 7 pages.
Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2011319480 dated Oct. 27, 2014, 3 pages.
Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2011319481 dated Oct. 23, 2014, 3 pages.
Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2011343660 dated Oct. 31, 2014, 3 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/IB2011/055820 dated May 21, 2012, 4 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/065201 dated Mar. 7, 2012, 14 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/065201 dated Jun. 27, 2013, 11 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/IB2011/055826 dated Sep. 14, 2012, 4 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/IB2011/055826 dated May 2, 2013, 11 pages.
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180060659.0, dated Nov. 3, 2014, 10 pages.
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180060662.2, dated Nov. 2, 2014, 13 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365 dated Oct. 24, 2012, 12 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365 dated Feb. 22, 2013, 15 pages.
Non-final Office Action and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365 dated Jun. 14, 2013, 18 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365 dated Oct. 18, 2013, 22 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365 dated Apr. 22, 2014, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Aug. 8, 2014, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,365, dated Jan. 12, 2015, 20 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,372 dated Nov. 21, 2012, 9 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,372 dated Mar. 7, 2013, 12 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,372 dated Aug. 1, 2013, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,372 dated Sep. 6, 2013, 8 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,389 dated Feb. 26, 2013, 21 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,389 dated Jul. 12, 2013, 25 pages.
Notice of Allowance and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,389 dated Sep. 19, 2013, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,389 dated Jan. 6, 2014, 8 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217 dated Jan. 17, 2014, 14 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217 dated Jul. 31, 2014, 13 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,217 dated Nov. 5, 2014, 3 pages.
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/006722, dated Dec. 8, 2014, 7 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 11815630.6, dated Nov. 20, 2015, 4 pages.
Notification of Reason(s) for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-534453, dated Dec. 22, 2015, 9 pages.
Patent Examination Report No. 2 for Australian Patent Application No. 2011343660, dated Oct. 22, 2015, 3 pages.
Notice of Acceptance for Australian Patent Application No. 2011319481, dated Oct. 12, 2015, 3 pages.
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180060659.0, dated Jun. 30, 2015, 6 pages.
Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180060659.0, dated Dec. 15, 2015, 6 pages.
Notification of Reason(s) for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2013-534454, dated Sep. 17, 2015, 7 pages.
Office Action and Search Report for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 100148694, dated Dec. 1, 2015, 18 pages.
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180060662.2, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 7 pages.
Office Action and Search Report for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 100148681, dated Oct. 5, 2015, 15 pages.
Decision to Grant a Patent for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-229136, dated May 8, 2018, 6 pages.
Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 1121/MUMNP/2013, dated Apr. 26, 2018, 7 pages.
Grant of Patent for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7017315, dated Apr. 26, 2018, 5 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/057731, dated May 3, 2018, 9 pages.
Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 957/MUMNP/2013, dated Jun. 6, 2018, 5 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,444, dated Apr. 18, 2018, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,444, dated Jul. 3, 2018, 15 pages.
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated Jul. 9, 2018, 4 pages.
First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 959/MUMNP/2013, dated Jul. 31, 2018, 6 pages.
Notice of Final Rejection for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7013039, dated Jul. 20, 2018, 5 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 11815631.4, dated Jun. 11, 2018, 6 pages.
Grant of Patent for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7013038, dated Aug. 22, 2018, 3 pages.
Examiner's Answer for U.S. Appl. No. 14/884,975, dated Jul. 18, 2018, 23 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,444, dated Jan. 16, 2018, 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/142,380, dated Feb. 7, 2018, 5 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/884,975, dated Feb. 23, 2018, 3 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated Apr. 5, 2018, 23 pages.
Decision of Reexamination for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180067287.4, dated Feb. 11, 2018, 23 pages.
First Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7013038, dated Mar. 5, 2018, 9 pages.
Office Action for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 104134259, dated Jan. 16, 2019, 9 pages.
Quayle Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,444, dated Feb. 5, 2019, 5 pages.
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated Jan. 22, 2019, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,444, dated Jul. 3, 2019, 8 pages.
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated Apr. 17, 2019, 5 pages.
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated May 20, 2019, 6 pages.
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 16858143.7, dated Jul. 3, 2019, 9 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,733, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 6 pages.
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,444, dated Aug. 13, 2019, 5 pages.
Preliminary Office Action for Brazilian Patent Application No. 112013009856-2, dated Oct. 15, 2019, 6 pages.
Grant of Patent for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7013039, dated Sep. 5, 2018, 2 pages.
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,444, dated Oct. 25, 2019, 5 pages.
Decision on Appeal for U.S. Appl. No. 14/884,975, dated Nov. 25, 2019, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Pat. No. 14,884,975, dated Feb. 10, 2020, 14 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170108696 A1 Apr 2017 US