Medical imaging, for example mammography, may use low-energy X-rays as part of a diagnostic and a screening tool to examine patient tissue. Mammography, for example, is used for the detection of breast cancer, typically through detection of characteristic masses contained within the patient tissue. X-ray exposure time, during mammography, may be for several seconds.
Mammography requires that the patient tissue being examined be compressed using a dedicated compression unit (e.g., a parallel-plate compression unit) to even out the thickness of the patient tissue which may increase image quality by reducing a thickness of patient tissue that X-rays have to penetrate. However, compression of patient tissue can be painful for a patient and may result in the patient moving and, in turn, moving the patient tissue during imaging.
When the patient tissue moves during imaging, images acquired by mammography may be blurred and unusable for diagnosing the patient tissue. Since, determining if an image is blurred only occurs after the images are taken, and the images are examined by a technician, a patient may have to endure multiple exposures to X-rays until a clear image is obtained.
Therefore, it would be desirable to design a system and method that allows for determining if an image is blurred while the image is being taken.
According to some embodiments, a method to create a medical image is disclosed. The method comprises receiving a plurality of patient tissue images during an x-ray dose. Furthermore, during the x-ray dose, a determination is made if motion occurred in the plurality of patient tissue images. In a case that no motion is determined, a diagnostic image of the patient tissue comprising the plurality of patient tissue images is created. Other embodiments are associated with systems and/or computer-readable medium storing instructions to perform any of the methods described herein.
The present embodiments, as described herein, may relate to a multi-frame acquisition technique to address the above-mentioned problems. Instead of acquiring a single image after a long x-ray exposure window, the proposed system and method may relate to the acquisition of multiple (e.g., several tens) of images during an exposure window (e.g., a period of time when a patient is exposed to a single dose of X-rays). Patient motion may be detected in real time by tracking the images between successive frames and information associated with each image may be used to make intelligent decisions to control X-ray exposure.
Referring to
The receiver 103 may comprise a detector 106 and a computer system 107. As illustrated, the detector 106 and the computer system 107 may be internal to the receiver 103, however, in some embodiments, the computer system 107 may be external to the receiver 103. The detector 106 may comprise a semiconductor-based detector, such as a Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (“CMOS”) based detector. CMOS is a technology that may be used for X-ray medical imaging detectors because its ultra low electronic noise and fast frame read out capabilities may be used to implement high-performance X-ray detectors.
In some embodiments, the detector 106 may comprise a CMOS X-ray detector that includes an image sensor panel comprising a pixel array. On a top of the image sensor panel a scintillator (not shown) may be disposed. Each pixel in the pixel array may comprise a charge collecting device (e.g., a photodiode) and an electronic circuit to access a signal from the pixel. The pixel array may absorb most of the x-rays and transfer their energy into optical photons that may be efficiently detected by the image sensor underneath. This detection mechanism may be referred to as an “in-direct” mechanism because the X-rays are first converted to optical photons which are in turn detected by the image sensor.
The detector 106 may function as a “camera” that captures X-rays 105. For example, X-ray photons may be converted to electron-hole pairs in the semiconductor based detector and are collected to detect the X-rays 105. The computer system 107 may function as a controller to control the X-ray generator 101 based on input from the detector 106. For example, the detector 106 may determine, during a single dose of X-rays 105, if motion occurred during the capturing of a plurality of patient tissue images and the computer system 107, in response to an input indicating that motion was detected, may manage an X-ray exposure time used to obtain the plurality of patient tissue images as well as manage which of the plurality of patient tissue images to use to create a diagnostic image. For example, in a first case, the computer system 107 may discard images prior to a time when motion is determined by the detector 106 and increase a time of the X-ray dose when the motion is determined at a start of the X-ray dose. In a second case, the computer system 107 may stop the X-ray dose and generate an indication that the X-ray dose was stopped when the motion is determined by the detector 106 at a middle of the X-ray dose. In a third case, the computer system 107 may stop the X-ray dose and discard the images from at time when the motion was determined by the detector 106 when the motion is determined by the detector 106 at an end of the X-ray dose.
Referring to
As stated above, the computer system 107 may function as a controller to control the X-ray generator 101 based on input from the detector 106. When the detector 106 determines that motion occurred during the capturing of a plurality of patient tissue images, the computer processor 203 may determine, during the x-ray dose, when the motion occurred and the exposure module 204 may mange the X-ray generator 101 in response to the detection of motion. The computer processor 203 may discard images prior to a time when motion is determined by the detector 106 when the computer processor determines that the motion was at a start of the X-ray dose. In this case, the exposure module 204 may indicate to the X-ray generator 101 to increase a time of the X-ray dose to compensate for the earlier detected motion. The exposure module 204 may stop the X-ray dose being administered by the X-ray generator 101 and the computer processor 203 may generate an indication that the X-ray dose was stopped when the computer processor 203 determines that the motion determined by the detector 106 was during a middle portion of the X-ray dose. The exposure module 204 may stop the X-ray dose being administered by the X-ray generator 101 and the computer processor 203 may discard the images from a time when the motion was determined by the motion detector 202 when the computer processor 203 determines that the motion occurred at an end of the X-ray dose.
At 310, a plurality of patient tissue images captured during an X-ray dose is received. The plurality of patient images may be received at a receiver, such as receiver 103 as described with respect to
For illustrative purposes, and to aid in understanding features of the specification, three examples will now be introduced. These three examples are not intended to limit the scope of the claims. The first example relates to motion being detected in real time during a start of an X-ray dose. The second example relates to motion being detected in real time during a middle of the X-ray dose. The third example relates to motion being detected in real time during an end of the X-ray dose.
Now referring to
Referring back to
Continuing with the first example, the image at T-0 may be subtracted from the image at T-1. A determination will be made, in real time, if any motion can be detected. Likewise, determinations for the existence of motion will be made for samples associated with the second example and the third example.
At 330, in a case that no motion is determined, a diagnostic image of the patient tissue will be created, the diagnostic image comprising the plurality of patient tissue images. The diagnostic image may comprise a composite of the plurality of images.
However, in a case that motion is detected, a determination will be made as to if the motion occurred at a start of the X-ray dose, a middle portion of the X-ray dose, or at an end of the X-ray dose. In a case that motion is determined at the start of the X-ray dose, the images prior to a time when the motion was determined may be discarded and an amount of time to administer the X-ray dose may be increased. The amount of time to increase the X-ray dose may equal an amount of time when motion was detected at a start of the X-ray dose. For example, if motion was detected at 0.1 second into the X-ray dose, the total exposure time may be extended by 0.1 sec. In a case that motion is determined at the middle of the X-ray dose, the administration of the X-ray dose may be stopped and an indication that the X-ray dose was stopped may be generated and sent to an operator of the X-ray generator. The indication may notify the operator of the X-ray generator that the X-ray exposure may need to be restarted. In a case that motion is determined at the end of the X-ray dose, administration of the X-ray dose may be stopped and the images from at time when the motion was determined may be discarded. In this case, the diagnostic image of the patient tissue may comprise the plurality of patient tissue images taken prior to the time when the motion was determined and a patient may be exposed to less X-rays than conventional systems.
Now referring to
The storage 501 may store information (e.g., including information associated with X-ray exposures). The medium 502 may comprise any computer-readable medium that may store processor-executable instructions to be executed by the processor 503. For example, the medium 502 may comprise a non-transitory tangible medium such as, but is not limited to, a compact disk, a digital video disk, flash memory, optical storage, random access memory, read only memory, or magnetic media.
The processor-executable instructions may be stored in a compressed, uncompiled and/or encrypted format. The processor-executable instructions may furthermore include program elements, such as an operating system, a database management system, and/or device drivers used by the processor 503 to interface with peripheral devices.
The processor 503 may include or otherwise be associated with dedicated registers, stacks, queues, etc. that are used to execute program code and/or one or more of these elements may be shared there between. In some embodiments, the processor 503 may comprise an integrated circuit. In some embodiments, the processor 503 may comprise circuitry to perform a method such as, but not limited to, the method described with respect to
The processor 503 communicates with the storage 501. The storage 501 may comprise any appropriate information storage device, including combinations of magnetic storage devices (e.g., a hard disk drive), optical storage devices, and/or semiconductor memory devices. The storage 501 may store a program for controlling the processor 503. The processor 503 performs instructions of the program, and thereby operates in accordance with any of the embodiments described herein. For example, the processor 503 may determine when motion occurred in a plurality of patient tissue images.
The main memory 505 may comprise any type of memory for storing data, such as, but not limited to, a Secure Digital (SD) card, a micro SD card, a Single Data Rate Random Access Memory (SDR-RAM), a Double Data Rate Random Access Memory (DDR-RAM), or a Programmable Read Only Memory (PROM). The main memory 505 may comprise a plurality of memory modules.
It is to be understood that not necessarily all such advantages described above may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the systems and techniques described herein may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
While only certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4647956 | Shrivastava et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
5081664 | Lie et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5125018 | Asahina | Jun 1992 | A |
5224141 | Yassa | Jun 1993 | A |
5400383 | Yassa | Mar 1995 | A |
5467380 | De Jonge et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5528043 | Spivey | Jun 1996 | A |
5530266 | Yonehara | Jun 1996 | A |
5625210 | Lee et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5777335 | Mochizuki et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5801385 | Endo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5859892 | Dillen | Jan 1999 | A |
5881184 | Guidash | Mar 1999 | A |
5903021 | Lee et al. | May 1999 | A |
5917883 | Khutoryansky | Jun 1999 | A |
5929499 | Kuhlmann et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5949061 | Guidash et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5986297 | Guidash et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6064431 | Ueno | May 2000 | A |
6069377 | Prentice et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075256 | Kaifu et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6100556 | Drowley et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107655 | Guidash | Aug 2000 | A |
6127697 | Guidash | Oct 2000 | A |
6160281 | Guidash | Dec 2000 | A |
6177293 | Netzer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6218656 | Guidash | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218692 | Guidash | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6259124 | Guidash | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6292528 | Wieczorek et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295336 | Aach | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297070 | Lee et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307195 | Guidash | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320617 | Gee et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323476 | Guidash et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6365926 | Guidash | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388245 | Lee | May 2002 | B1 |
6429718 | Lauter et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459765 | Ganin | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466265 | Lee et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466266 | Guidash et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476395 | Boerner et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6486504 | Guidash | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501064 | Kole | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6504195 | Guidash | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6510195 | Chappo et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6552323 | Guidash et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6586296 | Watt | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6587146 | Guidash | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597025 | Lauter et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6624850 | Guidash | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627896 | Hashimoto | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633334 | Sakurai | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657665 | Guidash | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661459 | Koizumi | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671347 | Tashiro et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6707066 | Morishita | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6710804 | Guidash | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714239 | Guidash | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721008 | Lee et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730897 | Guidash | May 2004 | B2 |
6744526 | McDermott et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763129 | Honda | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6800836 | Hamamoto et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6856670 | Hoheisel | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6906332 | Tashiro et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921948 | Watt | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7015479 | Haas et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7053354 | Luo et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7075061 | Spahn | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7102117 | Hopper et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7105830 | Nagano et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113096 | Spahn | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7129979 | Lee | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7136452 | Spartiotis | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7151287 | Scheffer et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7180073 | Tetsuo | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180075 | Brabec et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7199410 | Dierickx | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7202481 | Spahn et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7238948 | Fritzler et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7241983 | Spahn | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7253019 | Dierickx | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266177 | Spahn | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7271391 | Kameshima | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7304673 | Erhardt et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313225 | Mertelmeier | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315027 | Okada et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326934 | Dorscheid et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7326935 | Klausmann et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7327823 | Matsuura | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336763 | Spartiotis | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7340034 | Hayashida | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7356119 | Anno | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359482 | Schmitt | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365016 | Ouellet et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7408195 | Meynants | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7408238 | Shibayama | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421061 | Boese | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7435966 | Vogtmeier et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7436927 | Hempel | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7471767 | Spahn | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7480082 | Liang | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7489760 | Hemmendorff | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7498650 | Lauxtermann | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7507971 | Shibayama et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514686 | Ogawa et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7525097 | Dorscheid et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7550728 | Spahn | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7566169 | Jakob | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7589325 | Spahn | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7608837 | Roizin et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7622719 | Spahn | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627086 | Vogtmeier | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7634308 | Ogawa | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7659517 | Scheffer | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663115 | Korthout et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663117 | Wittmann | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7675097 | Adkisson et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7705317 | Miyaguchi | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7705911 | Kameshima | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7718945 | Sugiyama et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7728277 | Stevens et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7728303 | Mori et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742559 | Iordache | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7755689 | Stevens | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7776638 | Lavine | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783000 | Kotooka | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7800667 | Mizuno et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7808022 | Dierickx | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7838994 | Shibayama et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7858915 | McCarten et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7888626 | Slinger | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899223 | Boese | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7952058 | Nomura et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8018067 | Steadman et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8049256 | Guidash | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067743 | Ishii et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8097904 | Eminoglu et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8193501 | Rutten | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8203111 | Reshef | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8207485 | LePage | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8253214 | Guidash | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260025 | Walimbe | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8288733 | Herrmann | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306181 | Spartiotis | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8358739 | Lu | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8368027 | Ishii | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8368028 | Mori | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8396188 | Liu | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8483358 | Allison | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8483456 | Nagatsuka | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8513612 | Levene | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8542794 | Miyamoto | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8546859 | Maes | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8633572 | Vogtmeier | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8693632 | Allison | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8710448 | Luhta | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8729652 | Heringa | May 2014 | B2 |
8772727 | Ruetten | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8779366 | Wieczorek | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8822938 | Freund | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8859975 | Tokura | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8866098 | Hayatsu | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9000388 | Tokura | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9053538 | Takahashi | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9082182 | Sebok | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9087755 | Frach | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9117289 | Matsumoto | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9198628 | Shimada | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9201150 | Ruetten | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9320485 | Brenner | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20020131626 | Vogtmeier et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040000630 | Spartiotis et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040079865 | Hoshi | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050218353 | Liang | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060011853 | Spartiotis et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060203114 | Xu | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060203959 | Spartiotis et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070069144 | Kameshima | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071171 | Hayashida et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070176108 | Such et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070236590 | Harris | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080042231 | Maes et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080217546 | Steadman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090090846 | Stevens et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090095912 | Slinger et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090096046 | Heringa et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121146 | Luhta et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090230289 | Lepage | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090321643 | Rutten et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100034340 | Spartiotis et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100074396 | Schmand et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100127314 | Frach | May 2010 | A1 |
20100140491 | Herrmann et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100237228 | Reshef et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100294940 | Wieczorek | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100329421 | Ruetten et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110135057 | Mori et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110168892 | Steadman et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110240868 | Ruetten et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120033868 | Ren et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120037809 | Levene et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120057678 | Lu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120097857 | Hayatsu et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120189099 | Liu et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20140192960 | Sakaguchi | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4025427 | Feb 1992 | DE |
4420603 | Jun 1995 | DE |
10024489 | Nov 2001 | DE |
10331522 | Feb 2005 | DE |
102005005903 | Aug 2006 | DE |
102005017944 | Oct 2006 | DE |
102005057538 | Nov 2006 | DE |
102005049228 | Apr 2007 | DE |
102006033716 | Feb 2008 | DE |
102008063309 | Jul 2010 | DE |
0530972 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0899946 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0948056 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1073265 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1119188 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1152471 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1237198 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1492168 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1530162 | May 2005 | EP |
1724828 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1870937 | Dec 2007 | EP |
1894246 | Mar 2008 | EP |
2002477 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2554119 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2001135268 | May 2001 | JP |
2002344809 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2004241298 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2007105480 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2009240656 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2010034520 | Feb 2010 | JP |
0158144 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2002061456 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2008045356 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008073247 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2009072056 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009138400 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2011129132 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011129133 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011135486 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2013031667 | Mar 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bonnet et al., “Dynamic X-Ray Computed Tomography”, Proceedings of IEEE, Volume No. 91, Issue No. 10, pp. 1574-1587, Oct. 2003. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with corresponding Application No. US2015/043118 on Oct. 14, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160066875 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |