Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6224162
-
Patent Number
6,224,162
-
Date Filed
Tuesday, July 27, 199925 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, May 1, 200123 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
- Bagnell; David
- Kreck; John
Agents
- Hall, Priddy, Myers & Vande Sande
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 299 16
- 299 17
- 299 361
- 239 172
- 239 251
- 239 159
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
Apparatus for the hydrodemolition of concrete layer including a movable vehicle, a bed having a guideway extending transversely to a direction of movement of the vehicle, a nozzle assembly having a guide slidably engaging the guideway and a plurality of nozzles spaced apart in a direction transverse to the guideway, separate fluid flow controllers coupled between a pressurized source of fluid and respective nozzles, the nozzles being oriented to spray a fluid jet onto the concrete surface and on actuator for moving the nozzle assembly back and forth along the guideway.
Description
FIELD
The present invention relates to a multiple jet hydrodemolition apparatus and method in which multiple hydrodemolition nozzles are operated to cover a greater area in a single pass than a unit with a single nozzle. The term hydrodemolition is sometimes referred to as hydromilling or hydroplaning.
BACKGROUND
Many concrete surfaces whether in parking lots, over bridges, on tunnel walls, building walls or any other concrete surface are frequently accompanied by heavy steel reinforcement. Once cracks in the concrete develop, road salts corrode the steel. This corrosion accelerates the destructive cycle of moisture, salt, freeze-thaw, corrosion, vibration and traffic. Conventional methods of repairing these concrete surfaces involves first the removal of the deteriorated concrete surface around and below the reinforcing steel bars. This removal allows placement of new concrete surface over the reinforcing steel.
Ordinarily concrete removal has been accomplished by jackhammers, but the use of jackhammers is time-consuming, and costly and makes it difficult to achieve complete removal of deteriorated concrete. In addition, the use of a jackhammer causes microcracking of the remaining concrete in surrounding areas. In order to improve the speed and efficiency of concrete removal from bridge decks, highways, substructures and parking garages and, at the same time, avoiding the problems caused by microcracking, contractors began using high pressure water jets to remove the concrete. The use of high pressure water jets, termed hydrodemolition, involves moving an oscillating or rotating nozzle back and forth across a bed for a number of passes and then indexing or advancing a vehicle on which the bed and nozzle are supported to a next position where the process is repeated until a desired depth of concrete deck surface has been removed. The removal leaves clean reinforcing rod which has been descaled but otherwise undamaged and a rough textured concrete surface under the reinforcing rod which is ideal for bonding of new overlay. All deteriorated concrete is removed and entrained chlorides washed away. There is a greatly reduced noise and no vibration or dust.
The conventional equipment used in hydrodemolition has one nozzle which runs over a guide bed and traverses a swath to be treated. After each pass the machine is indexed until a region has been impacted by one traversal. The vehicle is then reversed and the process repeated with the machine moving in indexes in reverse. Again once the swath has been covered the vehicle is moved forward in an indexed manner and traversals of the nozzle are repeated until the swath has been covered three times. Ordinarily three such passes are required to complete the hydrodemolition. Since the cost of a job is directly proportional to the time taken to accomplish it, there is a need for a faster more efficient method of applying hydrodemolition than that currently used. Some conventional equipment will complete a number of passes in a given position before being indexed forward where a like number of passes is then completed.
Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide an improved method and apparatus for applying hydrodemolition. It is a further object to provide a faster method of treating a surface with hydrodemolition than is currently in use.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the invention there is provided an apparatus for hydrodemolition having a movable vehicle, a fluid jet assembly having at least two nozzles, one behind the other, coupled to said vehicle and each oriented to direct a jet of fluid onto an underlying concrete surface, a bed coupled to the vehicle for guiding the nozzles back and forth transverse to a direction of movement of the vehicle, a fluid flow controller coupled to each of the nozzles from a source of high pressure fluid such that the fluid flow to each nozzle is independently controlled and means for moving the nozzles back and forth.
Preferably, the nozzles are one of rotatable and oscillatory and direct fluid at an angle to the vertical so that it can clean around reinforcing steel. Advantageously, the pressure of fluid supplied to each nozzle is independently controllable. Advantageously, a third nozzle is employed behind the last of the two mentioned above.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided a method of hydrodemolition which includes making a first transverse pass across a surface to be treated with a first fluid jet from a first fluid nozzle, and incrementing said first fluid jet forwardly and making transverse passes at each incremental position until a second nozzle reaches the position of the first transverse pass and then turning on the fluid to said second nozzle so that the second fluid nozzle impacts the same region as did the first fluid nozzle during the fist pass. Next the first and second nozzles are incremented repeatedly until the first fluid jet impacts on a last transverse pass after which it is turned off. The second fluid jet is incremented repeatedly until it reaches a position of the last transverse pass. After completing the last transverse pass the second nozzle is turned off.
Preferably, a third nozzle is employed behind the second nozzle.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Further features and advantages will be apparent from the following detailed description, given by way of example, of a preferred embodiment taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1
is a perspective view of a hydrodemolition unit with applicant's invention;
FIG. 2
is a front elevation view showing the orientation of mounting the nozzles;
FIGS.
3
(
a
) to
3
(
g
) are schematic drawings showing the sequence of start up and ending steps by a three nozzle unit; and
FIG. 4
is a variant of
FIG. 1
in which long rotating pipes extend upwardly so that nozzles fitted to distal ends of the pipes can spray a ceiling.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION WITH REFERENCE TO THE DRAWINGS
Referring to
FIG. 1
a self-propelled vehicle
34
tows a hydrodemolition unit
36
over a concrete deck
32
. The hydrodemolition unit
36
has a carriage
35
to which is mounted a guideway
30
and a guide
28
movable along the guideway
30
by means of a lead screw
31
threadedly engaging a threaded hole in the guide
28
. A nozzle assembly
10
is affixed to the guide
28
consisting of three distributor pipes
24
a,
24
b
and
24
c,
coupled to respective electronically actuated valves
12
,
14
and
16
, which, in turn, are coupled to respective exchangers
38
,
39
, and
40
. The valves
12
can also be actuated hydraulically, by air pressure or manually. Exchanger
38
,
39
, and
40
couple the high pressure water to rotating nozzles
18
,
20
, and
22
, respectively. Nozzles
18
,
20
, and
22
are positioned one behind another in the direction of travel of vehicle
34
and are independently controllable and pressurized by three separate pumps
27
to permit fluid under pressure through each of nozzles
18
,
20
, and
22
. The spacing of the nozzles
18
,
20
, and
22
is in the range of ½ inch to 10 inches. However, other spacings could be used. Three hoses
26
couple to respective ones of three pumps
27
. A piston cylinder unit
33
permits vertical adjustment of the nozzle assembly
10
. Alternatively, manual replacement of the nozzle pipe
25
for each of nozzles
18
,
20
,
22
could be used to adjust the nozzle position. Instead of using separate pumps for each nozzle it is possible to use a single large pump for two or more nozzles with one of more splitters to divide the water equally between the nozzles when all are active.
Carriage
35
is attached to vehicle
34
by an articulating hydraulically operated arm (not shown) that can move carriage
35
into a horizontal, vertical or inverted position so that walls and ceilings can be treated as well as floors or decks.
Referring to
FIG. 2
, each nozzle
18
,
20
, and
22
is mounted to a nozzle receptacle at the end of respective rotating pipes
25
a,
25
b,
and
25
c,
respectively, so that each nozzle axis
23
(see
FIG. 2
which shows nozzle
18
as representative of all of the nozzles
18
,
20
and
22
) is at a slight angle to a vertical axis
21
. The nozzles
18
,
20
, and
22
are rotated or oscillated about the vertical axis
21
so that a water jet
19
emitted by each nozzle rotates about the vertical axis
21
producing a blast diameter D. The purpose of this arrangement is to permit the water jet to impact slightly under reinforcing rod (not shown) that is often embedded in the concrete to facilitate removal of any concrete bonded to the rod. The spacing of nozzles
18
,
20
, and
22
is approximately 6 inches but could be shorter or even longer. The blast diameter or amount of concrete removed by a rotating jet depends on the state of the concrete. Concrete that has deteriorated is easier to remove than concrete without any degradation.
Referring to FIGS.
3
(
a
) to
3
(
g
), the method by which a swath
43
of concrete decking, roadway, wall or ceiling is treated. In FIG.
3
(
a
) the process is commenced by turning on the water to the first nozzle
18
and allowing it to traverse a first pass
42
back and forth across the swath
43
of a concrete surface. The first nozzle
18
is moved incrementally forward and subsequent transverse passes are made at each incremental position until the second nozzle
20
reaches the position of the first pass
42
at which time water to the second nozzle
20
is turned on. The second nozzle
20
completes back and forth movement over the first transverse pass and then further incremental movements forward are made. At each incremental position both the first and second nozzles
18
and
20
, respectively, concurrently make a back and forth transverse movement spraying jets of water onto the swath
43
until the third nozzle
22
reaches the position of the first pass
42
. Water is then turned on to the third nozzle
22
which traverses the first pass
42
while nozzles
18
20
concurrently make transverse passes
46
and
48
as shown in FIG.
3
(
f
). Indexing of the transport vehicle
34
continues until the end of swath
43
(see FIG.
3
(
g
)) has been reached. After traversing the last pass
49
, water to the first nozzle
18
is turned off. The vehicle
34
is further moved forward incrementally and a second nozzle
20
is turned off after completing traversal of the last pass
49
. The incremental movement continues until the last nozzle
22
reaches the last pass
49
which it traverses before water to it is shut off. The size of the movement increments of vehicle
34
is normally equal to the blast diameter of the nozzles.
The amount of concrete removed at any one pass is proportional to the dwell time, the pressure and the volume of water. Generally, weakened concrete will be removed preferentially by the current system over good quality concrete.
The rate of water consumption with the present method is greater than with conventional methods, since the speed of processing is considerably greater than with conventional methods. Obviously, the increments of movement are chosen to suit the depth of concrete to be removed.
Referring to
FIG. 4
, long pipes
52
,
54
, and
56
are installed so that they extend upwardly from exchangers
38
,
39
, and
40
which are reoriented upwardly by rotating distributor pipes
24
a,
24
b,
and
24
c
through 180 degrees. Nozzles
58
,
60
, and
62
are installed in nozzle receptacles at the end of respective pipes
52
,
54
, and
56
at an acute angle to the vertical and the pipes
52
,
54
, and
56
rotated by respective exchangers
38
,
39
, and
40
. Pump
27
pressurizes water for nozzle
58
while large pump
70
pressurizes water for nozzles
60
and
62
utilizing a splitter
72
to split the water flow between the two nozzles while maintaining a constant pressure on each. The procedure is otherwise the same as that described for the system of FIG.
1
.
Accordingly, while this invention has been described with reference to illustrative embodiments, this description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications of the illustrative embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to this description. It is therefore contemplated that the appended claims will cover any such modifications or embodiments as fall within the true scope of the invention.
Claims
- 1. Apparatus for the hydrodemolition of a concrete surface, comprising:(a) a vehicle capable of movement along a direction of travel in incremental steps; (b) a bed extending transversely to the direction of travel of said vehicle; (c) a nozzle assembly so constructed to achieve hydrodemolition of said concrete surface having a plurality of nozzles spaced apart in a direction transverse to said bed wherein each nozzle is oriented so as to direct a fluid jet emitted therefrom at said concrete surface having its axis of flow at an acute angle to a notional line coincident to an axis of said nozzle perpendicular to said concrete surface and said nozzles are one of rotatable or oscillatory, whereby each nozzle cuts a swath of concrete by hydrodemolition; and (d) means for moving said nozzle assembly back and forth along said bed.
- 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein a separate fluid pump is provided for each nozzle.
- 3. The apparatus of claim 1, including at least one splitter from a pump operative to split water flow equally between two nozzles.
- 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the number of nozzles is three.
- 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the separation of each nozzle from an adjacent one is in the range of ½ inch to 10 inches.
- 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said nozzles are aligned along a direction of travel of said vehicle and move together transversely.
- 7. The apparatus of claim 1, including a plurality of fluid flow controllers coupled to respective nozzles of said plurality of nozzles operative to control fluid flow to each nozzle independently of all other nozzles.
- 8. A method of hydrodemolition of a swath of a concrete surface, comprising:(a) directing a jet of fluid under pressure emitted from a first nozzle against a first transverse region of said swath and moving said nozzle back and forth across said swath in a direction transverse to the direction of travel of the vehicle; (b) repeatedly moving said first nozzle ahead incrementally in a direction of travel and at each incremental position moving said first nozzle transversely across said swath until a second nozzle spaced rearwardly of said first nozzle overlies said first transverse region; (c) directing fluid from said first and second nozzles against said concrete surface, and moving them back and forth transversely to said direction of travel; (d) repeatedly moving said first and second nozzles ahead incrementally and then directing fluid jets emitted from said first and second nozzles against said concrete surface and moving them back and forth transversely to said direction of travel at each incremental position until a desired swath has been covered by said first nozzle; (e) turning off fluid from said first nozzle and continuing to incrementally move said second nozzle forward, and at each incremental position to move said second nozzle transversely to the direction of travel until the last transverse position of said swath has been transversed by back and forth movement of said swath of said second nozzle; and (f) turning off fluid from said second nozzle.
- 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the amount of incremental movement is substantially equal to the blast diameter of said fluid jets.
- 10. The method of claim 8, including mounting said first and second nozzles at an acute angle to notional lines through an axis of said nozzles and perpendicular to said concrete surface and wherein said first and second nozzles are one of rotating and oscillating.
- 11. A method of hydrodemolition of a swath of a concrete surface, comprising:(a) directing fluid under pressure from a first nozzles of N nozzles spaced by a predetermined amount in a direction of travel along said swath against a first transverse strip of said concrete surface, and moving said first nozzle transversely to the direction of travel back and forth across said swath; (b) repeatedly, incrementally moving said N nozzles ahead in a direction of travel by an incremental distance and at each incremental position and moving said first nozzle transversely to the direction of travel back and forth across said swath until a second nozzle spaced rearwardly of said first nozzle overlies said first transverse strip; (c) directing fluid under pressure from the first and second nozzles against a first and second strip of said concrete surface, and moving them back and forth transversely to said direction of travel; (d) repeatedly moving said N nozzles ahead by the incremental distance and successively directing fluid from the remaining nozzles of said N nozzles and moving the nozzles transversely back and forth until all N nozzles have directed spray over said first transverse strip in turn; (e) repeatedly moving said N nozzles ahead by the incremental distances and directing fluid under pressure from all N nozzles against said concrete surface while all N nozzles make transverse back and forth pass until said first nozzle reaches a last incremental position of said swath; (f) after said first nozzle has moved back and forth transversely spraying said last incremental position, turning off fluid from said first nozzle and moving said N nozzles ahead by the incremental amount; (g) repeatedly incrementing said second nozzle and moving it back and forth at each incremental position until it reaches and traverses the last incremental position of said swath; and (h) turning off fluid from said second nozzle and moving said N nozzles ahead successively by incremental amounts and completing transverse passes across said swath by each of said N nozzles and shutting off water to said each nozzle once it has completed a transverse pass.
- 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the N is three.
- 13. The method of claim 11, wherein said N nozzles are each at an acute angle to respective notional lines through axes of said nozzles and each of said N nozzles is one of rotate and oscillate.
- 14. The method of claim 11, wherein said nozzles are aligned along the direction of travel and move transversely to the direction of travel together.
- 15. The method of claim 11, wherein fluid pressure to each of said nozzles is independently controlled.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
2271371 |
Oct 1999 |
CA |
|
US Referenced Citations (7)
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
3325909 |
Jan 1985 |
DE |