1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus of selectively exchanging control and state information (extensible to exchange of upper layer application data) between network devices. The control and state information is exchanged via a frame that is scalable to support many different applications. More specifically, multiple virtual channels are established between network devices by blocking or control of certain data flows, without blocking the flow of other data through the same link, effectively increasing the bandwidth utilization of the link and the throughput of the network device.
2. Description of Related Art
Many types of network devices are necessary to allow a network to function properly. One such network device is commonly referred to as a switch. A switch is defined as a network component that receives incoming data, stores the data temporarily, and sends the data back out on another port. The switching is accomplished by determining a destination address from the incoming data and sending the data to a port or set of ports associated with the destination address. The control and monitoring of a switch is essential in handling the flow of data in high speed networks. The effective functioning of the switch can be enhanced by control of the traffic through the switch, including monitoring and modification of that traffic. One such function is the control of the selective flow of data through the switch in response to congestion, either internal or external to the switch. This function is also illustrative since it involves the exchange of control and state information between network devices.
Ethernet switches generally support two common mechanisms to handle resource congestion inside the switch. The ingress backpressure mechanism enables the switch to flow control the traffic sent by a remote link partner, i.e. another network connected to the switch. This process is illustrated in
In full duplex mode, this back pressure is achieved by sending a MAC (media access control) control frame called a “pause frame.” Upon receiving the pause frame, the remote link partner stops sending further packets until the timer specified in the pause frame expires or the switch explicitly sends resume frame (pause frame with timer=0). Thus, the entire link remains idle until communication resumes. This flow control mechanism on a full duplex port is specified in the IEEE std. 802.3x, in which it has been specified that an ingress port in a full duplex mode should send pause frames for flow control.
In half duplex mode, this back pressure mechanism can be achieved by enabling a jamming signal and thereby preventing any other station from sending the packet. For ports that are in half duplex mode, this prevents any other station from sending packets to the port. The enabling of jamming signal in half duplex is not a standard, but is done by many of the switch vendors.
These techniques help in avoiding losing any packet that was being received and forwarded by the ingress port and it is generally termed as a zero-loss mode of switching, or as a zero packet loss mode of switching. This process has other side effects, however, including an adverse impact on the switch's throughput and wire speed switch rate.
In addition, Ethernet switches also support a mechanism to handle head of line (HOL) blocking avoidance. This mechanism is illustrated in
In a zero-loss mechanism, the switch never drops any packet for any traffic scenario, the worst case being all ingress ports are sending packets to one egress port. In this zero-loss mode, the switch will hit the ingress back pressure threshold before hitting the egress HOL limit, so that it exerts Ingress back pressure rather than dropping packet going to the congested port. As such, there are disadvantages to both types of mechanisms used for controlling the flow of data through a switch.
In terms of providing actual control of the flow of data through a network device, the above processes are often crude with respect to the aspects they allow to be controlled. The present implementations can achieve zero-packet loss but the throughput of the network is often decreased. Alternatively, implementations dealing with HOL blocking can sustain throughput, but the loss of packets increases. Thus, there is a need for a mechanism in a network device that achieves zero-loss processing of data that does not have the detrimental effects on the performance of the network device found in the prior art processes. Additionally, there is also a need for selective flow control mechanism that can also be utilized to allow the flow of data having a certain priority to be unimpeded.
It is an object of this invention to overcome the drawbacks of the above-described conventional network devices and methods. The above control and monitoring of the processes of a network device can be accomplished through the establishment of multiple virtual channels between network devices. These virtual channels allow for the selective control of flows through the network device. The virtual channels also can provide for in-band management of the network device, as well as traffic shaping and rate control. The use of virtual channels facilitates operations, administration, and maintenance functions and simplifies device detection and remote monitoring of the functions of the network device.
According to one aspect of this invention, a method for establishing a virtual channel between network devices is disclosed. In the case of a local network device establishing a virtual channel with a remote network device, a virtual channel request message is sent from the local network device to the remote network device. A virtual channel acknowledgement message and a remote capability list are received and a virtual channel resume message and a local capability list are sent. The virtual channel is then enabled. Similarly, in the case of a remote network device establishing a virtual channel with a local network device, a virtual channel request message sent from a remote network device, is received by a local network device. A virtual channel acknowledgement message and a remote capability list are sent and a virtual channel resume message and a local capability list are received. The virtual channel is then enabled.
Additionally, the virtual channel request message may be an Ethernet frame that is interpreted as a pause frame when the remote network device is not virtual channel capable. Also, a request retry timer may be used to wait for a specified period after the request message is sent and then resent after the specified period when no virtual channel acknowledgement message has been received. A request retry limit value may be used to limit the number of times the request message is sent. Similarly, an acknowledgement retry timer may be used to wait a specified period after the acknowledgement message is sent and then resent after the specified period when no virtual channel resume message has been received. Also, an acknowledgement retry limit value may be used to limit the number of times the acknowledgement message is sent.
Also, the local and remote capability lists can be in the form of link advertisement registers where each bit of the registers refers to specific capabilities of the local and remote network devices, and these registers are sent and received in the steps of the method. Furthermore, the virtual channel request message, the virtual channel acknowledgement message and the virtual channel resume message can each have an Ethernet frame format with a source address and a destination address being one of an address of the local network device and an address of the remote network device.
In addition, the virtual channel may be established through auto-negotiation between the local network device and the remote network device and can use the sending and receipt of next pages to exchange virtual channel data.
In another aspect of the invention, a virtual channel capable network device is disclosed. The device includes means for sending or receiving a virtual channel request message from or to a second network device and means for sending or receiving a virtual channel acknowledgement message and a first capability list. The device also includes means for sending or receiving a virtual channel resume message and a second capability list and means for enabling the virtual channel. When the virtual channel acknowledgement message is sent by the virtual channel capable network device, the first capability list is a capability list for the virtual channel capable network device and when the virtual channel acknowledgement message is received by the virtual channel capable network device, the first capability list is a capability list for the second network device.
Additionally, the network device may include means for sending or receiving an Ethernet frame that is interpreted as a pause frame when the second network device is not virtual channel capable. Also, the device may have one or both of a request retry timer and an acknowledgement retry timer, used to determine the period after which either the request or acknowledgement messages should be resent if the proper reply is not received. The device may also use one or both of a request retry limit value and an acknowledgement retry limit value in determining the number of times a message should be resent.
Also, link advertisement registers may be used, where each bit of the registers refers to specific capabilities of the local and remote network devices. The virtual channel request message, the virtual channel acknowledgement message and the virtual channel resume message can each have an Ethernet frame format with a source address and a destination address being one of an address of the virtual channel capable network device and an address of the second network device.
The device may also include means for auto-negotiation (as specified in the IEEE std. 802.3) between the virtual channel capable network device and the second network device to establish communications there between. Also, the device may also incorporate means for sending and receiving next pages used to exchange virtual channel data.
These and other objects of the present invention will be described in or be apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments.
For the present invention to be easily understood and readily practiced, preferred embodiments will now be described, for purposes of illustration and not limitation, in conjunction with the following figures:
The virtual channel (VC) protocol is intended for exchange of proprietary control between network devices such as switches, routers, network interface cards (NICs), cable modems and related devices. The VC protocol, according to an embodiment of the invention, enables value add functions such as selective flow control, operations, administration and maintenance (OAM) functions, in-band management and many other functions between network devices. The VC protocol can be applied to any media between network devices that are so configured.
The VC protocol has many applications, including selective flow control, in-band management, rate control, traffic shaping, device detection, OAM functions, remote monitoring, and remote alarms.
An exemplary application of the virtual channels of the present invention is directed to selective flow control (SFC). The IEEE 802.3 standard defines link level flow control between two Ethernet devices. For example, if a switch port is congested, it can send a flow control frame to the remote end to stop all incoming traffic. However, if the remote is sending both delay sensitive and delivery sensitive traffic, it is desirable to flow control only the delivery sensitive traffic and not the delay sensitive traffic. This is the feature referred to as selective flow control (SFC).
In
Another important application of the VC protocol is in-band management. This functionality permits a management agent to control a device through a port, rather than through a dedicated bus, such as peripheral component interconnect (PCI). In particular, an internal, VC enabled port can provide full access to the register and memory space of the device, as well as provide the ability to set up remote monitoring, RMON-like trap conditions which will generate an alert by sending a VC frame. The device can then be fully managed without the need for a dedicated CPU.
The architectural paradigm for the VC framework is as follows. The framework enables most common applications and has a minimal impact on link bandwidth. The VC is enabled based on a hardware mechanism with optional software control and the VC does not violate any layer standard (IEEE, IETF). The framework is flexible to allow multiple applications and functions, the architecture is scalable for complex applications and enables customer specific applications to provide differentiation among system vendors using VC-capable devices.
Each of the local and remote sides must indicate it is VC capable. This is accomplished by a three-way handshake. Once the local and remote sides are VC aware, a mechanism is necessary to pass application specific information between the local and remote devices. This is accomplished through a VC frame, which contains all the relevant control information.
When a device supporting VC establishes a link, it should determine whether its link partner is VC capable, and, if so, what functionality to activate. Two of the mechanisms are proposed to establish this are: using the three-way VC handshake mechanism and/or using the next page capability of auto-negotiation.
Once the capabilities are exchanged, VC control frames are sent to execute the supported functionalities. The actual triggering of the VC frame is dependent on several factors including the application, the state of the device and implementation dependencies.
VC Handshake
The VC handshake is performed by the exchange of proprietary frames. It has at least two important tasks to perform: 1) to enable the VC mode between the two link partners and 2) to determine common VC capabilities of the two link partners.
The VC handshake mechanism is for full duplex ports and is based on the 802.3x pause control frame used for flow control, as specified in the std. 802.3x. This mechanism has distinct advantages, including being 100% compatible with IEEE standard devices (non-VC mode) and 100% forward compatible with the future VC framework. The mechanism is extensible to new Ethernet standards (10 GE), is independent of media type (copper, fiber, etc.), is a hardware based handshake mechanism and has the flexibility to fine tune the handshake parameters using software.
The VC handshake specification expands upon the MAC pause control frames. It has the following requirements. The handshake should be initiated immediately after link-up, which is after the completion of the auto-negotiation process. The handshake may be initiated by each link partner. It should only be initiated on links in full duplex mode.
The VC handshake is comprised of three steps. To successfully complete the VC handshake, the third step should be completed. The steps are:
For all VC handshake frames, the pause timer field should be set according to the current state of the port. The value used should be the same value that would be used if the port were sending a normal pause frame rather than a VC frame. This ensures that non-VC devices connected to this port will act appropriately.
In general, VC capabilities are asymmetrical and involve sending a specific type of VC control frame and involve obeying that type of VC control frame. In order for VC functionality to be enabled, the VC handshake may be initiated from both link partners. Each device that is capable of generating VC frames may initiate a VC handshake by sending a VC REQUEST frame.
The request phase, initiated by the local device, is an encoded pause frame sent to the remote device on the link with pause timer value determined by the current state of the port. The frame format follows the standard pause control frame with following field settings:
Request phase encoding uses the 6 bytes of “don't care” SA address field of pause control frame (Bit 40 of SA address set to “0” to avoid multicast source address). The frame encodes the VC REQUEST with following bit assignment, also shown in
For the VC signature, an 8-bit checksum is calculated (XOR of bytes in header) and is used as a signature. If this checksum is not correct, the frame should be treated as a normal pause frame. The VC revision ID is an 8-bit VC specification revision ID field. It indicates the VC architectural framework compliance of the local device. This Rev ID is useful for backward compatibility as the VC specification evolves. For first generation devices, the VC revision ID is “1” and up to a maximum of 255 revisions of VC specifications is supported.
The VC vendor ID is an 8-bit vendor ID field. It indicates the vendor ID of the VC silicon. The default value is 0x1. The allocation of the vendor ID is performed when requested by the customer for a unique vendor ID. The intent on providing vendor ID is for system vendors to provide differentiated products and services to their customers. The VC device type is a 16-bit field. It is intended to provide an indication of the capabilities of the device by indicating the family to which it belongs.
The VC negotiation code is an 8-bit field with bit zero always set to “0” (to avoid a source routed frame). The negotiation codes are instrumental in conducting the VC handshake mechanism. Support of up to a maximum of 127 unique negotiation codes is provided. Following are a few example negotiation codes, with others being developed based on future requirements:
The local has an internal REQ retry timer and REQ retry limits (both programmable by software before link up). The REQ timer is based on the standard pause timer mechanism, except that it is within the local device. If the local does not receive any VC ACK response from remote before the timer expires, the local device re-sends another VC request. The number of VC REQUEST retried by local is controlled by the REQ retry limits value. The default for the internal REQ retry timer is 0x1FFF and the default for the internal REQ retry limits is 3.
The ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (ACK) response phase is an encoded pause frame sent from the remote (responder) back to the local (requester) after receiving the initial VC request packet. If the remote device does not support the VC protocol, the remote device enters a pause state as per the standard pause frame. Otherwise, the fields have the following meaning:
With respect to acknowledgement phase encoding, the 6 byte SA field of the remote device VC ACK and the remote VC identification is encoded with exactly the same semantics as the six bytes of SA address field in the VC REQUEST phase. The description of this field is exactly the same as outlined above in the VC REQUEST phase with remote response and shown in
The remote has an internal ACK retry timer and ACK retry limits (both programmable by software). The ACK timer is based on the standard pause timer mechanism, except that it is within the remote device. If the remote does not receive any VC RESUME response from local before the timer expires, the remote device re-sends another VC ACK. The number of VC ACK sent by remote is controlled by the ACK retry limits value. As an example, the default for the internal ACK retry timer is set to 0x1FFF and the default for the internal ACK retry limits is set to 3.
The RESUME response phase, initiated by the local device, is also an encoded pause frame sent to the remote with pause timer value determined by the port's current state. After receiving the ACK from the remote device, the local device sends the local capability list in the resume frame. The 42 bytes of data payload encode the list of VC functions that should be enabled on the link.
The 6 byte SA field of local device VC RESUME and local VC identification is encoded with exactly the same semantics as the six bytes of SA address field in the VC REQUEST phase. The description of this field is exactly the same as outlined in VC REQUEST phase, which is illustrated in
In addition, the VC architecture is also capable of handling special conditions arising during the VC handshake mechanism. One such condition occurs if the VC REQUEST needs to be retried. If the VC ACK response does not come from the remote, the local re-sends another REQUEST, limited to maximum REQ retry limit value. If the REQ retry limit is reached and no ACK has arrived, the local MAC switches to non-VC (standard) mode and supports the standard Ethernet packet flow.
In the case when the VC ACK is retried, i.e. the VC RESUME response does not come from the local, the remote re-sends another ACK, limited to maximum ACK retry limit value. If the ACK retry limit is reached and no RESUME arrived, the remote MAC switches to non-VC (standard) mode.
In addition, a remote device may receive multiple VC REQUEST frames. This can happen if the local device did not receive the VC ACK frame from the remote or the VC ACK frame had CRC errors. The “remote” device should send an ACK frame for each request received. However, the “remote” may send one VC ACK frame if multiple REQUEST frames are received before an ACK is sent by the “remote”. Similarly, a local device may receive multiple VC ACK frames. This could happen if the “remote” did not receive the RESUME frame or the RESUME frame has CRC errors. The local should send an ACK frame for each RESUME frame it receives. However, the local may send one RESUME frame if multiple ACKS are received before a RESUME frame is sent.
Also, if the two VC link partners find during the handshake that the other link partner supports a different version of VC specification, then the two VC devices settle for the lowest common denominator feature set between the two versions.
In general, the pause timer value indicated in the VC handshake frame should be obeyed. In this way, pause may be asserted during the VC handshake if required. If a non-zero pause time is specified by the VC handshake frame, then the receiver of the frame may send further VC handshake frames, but it should not send normal frames until the pause time is elapsed (or until pause has been de-asserted).
In order for VC handshake operation to operate, certain registers need to be set. Guidelines for the design of the VC handshake mechanism in the MAC are provided below, where the following items may entail the use of multiple registers. Control of VC subsystems, such as enabling handshake, forcing renegotiation, determining manner of function enabling (automatic or software) etc., should be supported. Registers devoted to VC status should be supported, including a per port register, indicating successful completion of VC handshake and other necessary status information. Registers for the REQUEST phase timer and the REQUEST retry limit counter, discussed above, need to be included, as well as registers for the ACK phase timer and the ACK retry limit counter.
Additional registers are required in respective devices for capability negotiation. These include read only VC capability registers indicating the capabilities of local and remote devices and VC local and remote advertisement registers. The VC advertisement registers are usually a copy of VC capability, and this is the actual value that is advertised by the local and remote device during the handshake. In this way, software can disable some capabilities in local and/or remote device, if desired.
Since the handshake can be initiated by both the link partners, hardware implementation can provide two advertisement registers per device. For example: 1) VC local client advertisement register (read/write register) containing the values to be advertised in the ACK frame sent during the VC handshake. This register indicates the client functions supported by the local device (which VC frames will be obeyed by the local side). 2) VC local server advertisement register (read/write register) containing the values to be sent in the RESUME frame sent during the VC handshake. It indicates the server functions supported by the local device (which VC frames the local side may generate).
In addition, other registers are not strictly required and are thus optional VC registers. For example, a VC device may implement the VC local and remote advertisement register as separate registers for the ACK (client functions) and RESUME (server functions) phases of the handshake. Thus, the local device may have a VC remote advertisement register initialized with the values indicated in the ACK frame received during the VC handshake. This indicates the client functions supported by the remote device. Similarly, the remote device may have a VC local advertisement register initialized with the values indicated in the RESUME frames received during the VC handshake. This indicates the functions supported by the local device.
A VC functionality enabled register may also be required that indicates what VC functionality is actually enabled. This may be configured by software or as a result of the VC handshake.
Lastly, with respect to the VC handshake triggering, the VC handshake frames are typically the first frames exchanged between the devices involved. The handshake should immediately follow the link up state. Thus, a reliable indication of link up is required.
VC Capability Exchange
The VC handshake mechanism allows the link partners to be VC aware. At the same time, VC capabilities are exchanged between the link partners during the ACK and RESUME phases of the handshake. The link partners participating in the VC handshake must support the VC capability registers, which consist of VC control, local VC capability, local VC advertisement and remote VC advertisement registers. It is noted that each of these may be a set of registers depending on implementation, for example, if the register size of the device is smaller than the number of VC capability bits. Each type is referred to as a single register to emphasize the parallel nature of the sets.
The exchange of the capabilities is done via the VC link advertisement register encoded in the data payload of the VC ACK and RESUME frame. Each bit in this sequence may refer to an individual application op-code or to a collection or related application op-codes. A “1” indicates that a specific capability is enabled and “0” indicates that it is disabled. The intent of VC capability registers is to provide the required configuration settings for the VC applications supported by both local and remote devices. In addition VC devices may implement configuration registers which give overall control to enable/disable hardware functionality. The size of all VC capability registers is recommended to be 32 bits for the initial version.
The bits in each VC capability register can refer to the same functionality. However, the significance depends on whether the register represents the local or remote ability. The following TABLE 1 is an implementation example to show the applications supported in one version of the VC architecture.
Each VC aware device supports the following sets of registers. The local VC capability register is a read only register set. The register defines the set of capabilities of which the local device is capable. The local VC advertisement register is a read/write register set. This register advertises the local VC capability to the remote. It may be initialized in one of two ways: it may be 0 to advertise no abilities by default, and thus software is required to change the register, or it may be copied from the local VC ability register.
The remote VC advertisement register is a read only register set, but its value is determined by the VC negotiation. This register is populated by the local when it receives the ACK frame, and by the remote when it receives the RESUME frame during the handshake.
The VC functionality enabled register is a read/write register set. The purpose of this register is to enable the hardware functionality of the indicated VC operations. The default value of this register may be indicated in one of two ways depending on configuration settings and is determined by the result of the VC Handshake frames. The ability to generate a certain VC frame type (that is, to be a server for this operation) is enabled if the device is capable of this function (as indicated in the Local Ability register) and the corresponding VC Frame obey function is advertised by the remote device (as indicated in the Remote Advertisement register). Alternatively, the ability to obey a certain VC frame type (that is, to be a client for this operation) is enabled if the device is capable of this function (as indicated in the Local Ability register) and the remote device is capable of generating that frame type.
VC Frame Format
The VC frame format has been developed to meet many requirements. Included in these requirements is to provide point-to-point communication, to enable end-to-end communication and enable redirection of packet to a CPU. Other requirements include allowing customer specific functionality, a scalable frame format to allow complex applications, and to enable use of Ethertype for purposes other than VC. The various formats for VC frames are described below.
The source address should be that of the device sending the VC frame. The Ethertype field represents the Ethertype value assigned by IEEE. The protocol field represents the type of application. For VC applications this field MUST be 1. This field permits applications other than VC to use frames with this Ethertype.
The VC tag may have one of the three formats as discussed below. In the VC_TAG_TYPE0 frame format, illustrated in
The 8-bit OPCODE0 field represents the op-code of an application and the associated function. The value of 0xFF is a reserved value, which indicates that the next 8 bits is the op-code value. If the value of OPCODE0 is other than 0xFF, then the fields following the OPCODE0 is a parameter field. The rest of this word may be occupied by parameters for Type 0 op-codes.
In the VC_TYPE_TAG1 VC tag format, illustrated in
In the VC_TYPE_TAG2 VC tag format, illustrated in
Auto-Negotiation
The auto-negotiation function allows a device to advertise enhanced modes of operation it possesses to a device at the remote end of a link segment and to detect corresponding enhanced operational modes that the other device may be advertising. The complete implementation details on auto-negotiation are explained in IEEE802.3 specifications. The virtual channel (VC) capability is established between the two link partners by adding new bits and new registers to the IEEE802.3 specifications.
VC capable devices can use the next-page feature in the standard auto-negotiation arbitration mechanism to allow exchange of VC capabilities. The next page format for VC capability exchange is implementation dependent.
The above-discussed configuration of the invention is, in one embodiment, embodied on a semiconductor substrate, such as silicon, with appropriate semiconductor manufacturing techniques and based upon a circuit layout which would, based upon the embodiments discussed above, be apparent to those skilled in the art. A person of skill in the art with respect to semiconductor design and manufacturing would be able to implement the various modules, interfaces, and components, etc. of the present invention onto a single semiconductor substrate, based upon the architectural description discussed above. It would also be within the scope of the invention to implement the disclosed elements of the invention in discrete electronic components, thereby taking advantage of the functional aspects of the invention without maximizing the advantages through the use of a single semiconductor substrate.
Although the invention has been described based upon these preferred embodiments, it would be apparent to those of skilled in the art that certain modifications, variations, and alternative constructions would be apparent, while remaining within the spirit and scope of the invention. In order to determine the metes and bounds of the invention, therefore, reference should be made to the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/006,968, filed on Jan. 14, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/806,427, filed on May 31, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,116,203, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/173,422, filed on Jun. 18, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,239,636, which in turn makes reference to, claims priority to and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/306,870, filed on Jul. 23, 2001. The subject matter of the earlier filed applications is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3749845 | Fraser | Jul 1973 | A |
4218756 | Fraser | Aug 1980 | A |
4333020 | Maeder | Jun 1982 | A |
4395774 | Rapp | Jul 1983 | A |
4433378 | Leger | Feb 1984 | A |
4445051 | Elmasry | Apr 1984 | A |
4449248 | Leslie et al. | May 1984 | A |
4463424 | Mattson et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4519068 | Krebs et al. | May 1985 | A |
4545023 | Mizzi | Oct 1985 | A |
4590550 | Eilert et al. | May 1986 | A |
4599526 | Paski | Jul 1986 | A |
4649293 | Ducourant | Mar 1987 | A |
4680787 | Marry et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4717838 | Brehmer et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4721866 | Chi et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4727309 | Vajdic et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4737975 | Shafer et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4760571 | Schwarz | Jul 1988 | A |
4761822 | Maile | Aug 1988 | A |
4763319 | Rozenblit | Aug 1988 | A |
4777657 | Gillaspie | Oct 1988 | A |
4791324 | Hodapp | Dec 1988 | A |
4794649 | Fujiwara et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4804954 | Macnak et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4806796 | Bushey et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4807282 | Kazan et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4817054 | Banerjee et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4817115 | Campo et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4821034 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4850009 | Zook et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4890832 | Komaki | Jan 1990 | A |
4894792 | Mitchell et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4905231 | Leung et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4916441 | Gombrich | Apr 1990 | A |
4964121 | Moore et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4969206 | Desrochers | Nov 1990 | A |
4970406 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4977611 | Maru et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4995099 | Davis et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5008879 | Fischer et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5025486 | Klughart et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5029183 | Tymes | Jul 1991 | A |
5031231 | Miyazaki et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5033109 | Kawano | Jul 1991 | A |
5041740 | Smith | Aug 1991 | A |
5055659 | Hendrick et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5055660 | Bertagna et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5079452 | Lain et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5081402 | Koleda | Jan 1992 | A |
5087099 | Stolarczyk et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5115151 | Hull | May 1992 | A |
5117501 | Childress et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119502 | Kallin et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5121408 | Cai et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5122689 | Barre | Jun 1992 | A |
5123029 | Bantz et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5128938 | Borras et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5134347 | Koleda | Jul 1992 | A |
5142573 | Umezawa | Aug 1992 | A |
5149992 | Allstot | Sep 1992 | A |
5150361 | Wieczorek et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152006 | Klaus et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5153878 | Krebs et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5162674 | Allstot et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5175870 | Mabey et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5177378 | Nagasawa | Jan 1993 | A |
5179721 | Comroe et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5181200 | Harrison | Jan 1993 | A |
5196805 | Beckwith et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5216295 | Hoang | Jun 1993 | A |
5230084 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239662 | Danielson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241542 | Natarajan et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241691 | Owen | Aug 1993 | A |
5247656 | Kabuo et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249220 | Moskowitz et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249302 | Metroka et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5265238 | Canova et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5265270 | Stengel et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5274666 | Dowdell et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5276680 | Messenger | Jan 1994 | A |
5278831 | Mabey et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5289055 | Razavi | Feb 1994 | A |
5289469 | Tanaka | Feb 1994 | A |
5291516 | Dixon et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5293639 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5296849 | Ide et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297144 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301196 | Ewen | Apr 1994 | A |
5304869 | Greason | Apr 1994 | A |
5315591 | Brent et al. | May 1994 | A |
5323392 | Ishii et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329192 | Wu | Jul 1994 | A |
5331509 | Kikinis | Jul 1994 | A |
5345449 | Buckingham et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349649 | Iijima et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5361397 | Wright et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5363121 | Freund | Nov 1994 | A |
5373149 | Rasmussen | Dec 1994 | A |
5373506 | Tayloe et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5390206 | Rein et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392023 | D—Avello et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5394402 | Ross | Feb 1995 | A |
5406615 | Miller et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5406643 | Burke et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5418837 | Johansson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420529 | Guay et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423002 | Hart | Jun 1995 | A |
5426637 | Derby et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428636 | Meier | Jun 1995 | A |
5430845 | Rimmer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5434518 | Sinh et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437329 | Brooks et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5440560 | Rypinski | Aug 1995 | A |
5455527 | Murphy et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5457412 | Tamba et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459412 | Mentzer | Oct 1995 | A |
5465081 | Todd | Nov 1995 | A |
5473607 | Hausman et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5481265 | Russell et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5481562 | Pearson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488319 | Lo | Jan 1996 | A |
5502719 | Grant et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5510734 | Sone | Apr 1996 | A |
5510748 | Erhart et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5519695 | Purohit et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519707 | Subramanian | May 1996 | A |
5521530 | Yao et al. | May 1996 | A |
5533029 | Gardner et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5535373 | Olnowich et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544222 | Robinson | Aug 1996 | A |
5548230 | Gerson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5548238 | Zhang et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550491 | Furuta | Aug 1996 | A |
5574724 | Bales et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5576644 | Pelella | Nov 1996 | A |
5579487 | Meyerson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5583456 | Kimura | Dec 1996 | A |
5583859 | Feldmeier | Dec 1996 | A |
5584048 | Wieczorek et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5600267 | Wong et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603051 | Ezzet | Feb 1997 | A |
5606268 | Van Brunt | Feb 1997 | A |
5619497 | Gallagher et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625308 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628055 | Stein et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630061 | Richter et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640356 | Gibbs | Jun 1997 | A |
5640399 | Rostoker | Jun 1997 | A |
5668809 | Rostoker et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675583 | Bales et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5675584 | Jeong et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5675585 | Bonnot et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680038 | Fiedler | Oct 1997 | A |
5680633 | Koenck et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5689644 | Chou | Nov 1997 | A |
5724361 | Fiedler | Mar 1998 | A |
5726588 | Fiedler | Mar 1998 | A |
5732346 | Lazaridis et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740366 | Mahany et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742604 | Edsall et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744366 | Kricka et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744999 | Kim et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748612 | Stoevhase et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748631 | Bergantino et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754549 | DeFoster et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757770 | Lagoutte et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758078 | Kurita et al. | May 1998 | A |
5767699 | Bosnyak et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778414 | Winter et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796727 | Harrison et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798658 | Werking et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802258 | Chen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802287 | Rostoker et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802465 | Hamalainen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802576 | Tzeng et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805927 | Bowes et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821809 | Boerstler et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826027 | Pedersen et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828653 | Goss et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829025 | Mittal | Oct 1998 | A |
5831985 | Sandorfi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839051 | Grimmett et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844437 | Asazawa et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848251 | Lomelino et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859669 | Prentice | Jan 1999 | A |
5861881 | Freeman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5875465 | Kilpatrick et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877642 | Takahashi | Mar 1999 | A |
5887146 | Baxter et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887187 | Rostoker et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892382 | Ueda et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892922 | Lorenz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893150 | Hagersten et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893153 | Tzeng et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903176 | Westgate | May 1999 | A |
5905386 | Gerson | May 1999 | A |
5907553 | Kelly et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908468 | Hartmann | Jun 1999 | A |
5909127 | Pearson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5909686 | Muller et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914955 | Rostoker et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5937169 | Connery et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940771 | Gollnick et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945847 | Ransijn | Aug 1999 | A |
5945858 | Sato | Aug 1999 | A |
5945863 | Coy | Aug 1999 | A |
5951637 | Kuzma et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961631 | Devereux et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969556 | Hayakawa | Oct 1999 | A |
5974508 | Maheshwari et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977800 | Iravani | Nov 1999 | A |
5978379 | Chan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5978849 | Khanna et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987507 | Creedon et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002279 | Evans et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008670 | Pace et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014041 | Somasekhar et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014705 | Koenck et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6025746 | So | Feb 2000 | A |
6026075 | Linville et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028454 | Elmasry et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037841 | Tanji et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6037842 | Bryan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038254 | Ferraiolo et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061351 | Erimli et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061747 | Ducaroir et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064626 | Stevens et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081162 | Johnson | Jun 2000 | A |
6094074 | Chi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097722 | Graham et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6098064 | Pirolli et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104214 | Ueda et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111425 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111859 | Godfrey et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114843 | Olah | Sep 2000 | A |
6118776 | Berman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122667 | Chung et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128305 | Hjalmtysson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151662 | Christie et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157623 | Kerstein et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6178159 | He et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185185 | Bass et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188339 | Hasegawa | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194950 | Kibar et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202125 | Patterson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202129 | Palanca et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209020 | Angle et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215497 | Leung | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218878 | Ueno | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222380 | Gerowitz et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223239 | Olarig | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226680 | Boucher et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232844 | Talaga, Jr. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243386 | Chan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259312 | Murtojärvi | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265898 | Bellaouar | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266797 | Godfrey et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269427 | Kuttanna et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279035 | Brown et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6310501 | Yamashita | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324181 | Wong et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332179 | Okpisz et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344571 | Wiegerinck et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6349098 | Parruck et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349365 | McBride | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356944 | McCarty | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363011 | Hirose et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366583 | Rowett et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6373846 | Daniel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374311 | Mahany et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377571 | Tai | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385201 | Iwata | May 2002 | B1 |
6396832 | Kranzler | May 2002 | B1 |
6396840 | Rose et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6424194 | Hairapetian | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424624 | Galand et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427171 | Craft et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434620 | Boucher et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438651 | Slane | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459681 | Oliva | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463092 | Kim et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470029 | Shimizu | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484224 | Robins et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490622 | Nagami et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496479 | Shionozaki | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6535518 | Hu et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538486 | Chen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6563827 | Brueckheimer et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6564267 | Lindsay | May 2003 | B1 |
6597689 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606321 | Natanson et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614791 | Luciani et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6614796 | Black et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6630135 | Cagle et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6631351 | Ramachandran et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633936 | Keller et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636485 | Fijolek et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636947 | Neal et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640248 | Jorgensen | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6658599 | Linam et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665759 | Dawkins et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6681283 | Thekkath et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6757291 | Hu | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757746 | Boucher | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6766389 | Hayter et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6771601 | Aydemir et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788686 | Khotimsky et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6788704 | Lindsay | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6810040 | Lee et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816932 | Cho et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822940 | Zavalkovsky et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6845403 | Chadalapaka | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850521 | Kadambi et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6859435 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862296 | Desai | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6862621 | Takada | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6865158 | Iwamoto | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6874054 | Clayton et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6897697 | Yin et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6904519 | Anand et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911855 | Yin et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912221 | Zadikian et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6912603 | Kanazashi | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6927606 | Kocaman | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937080 | Hairapetian | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6938092 | Burns | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6957269 | Williams et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6971006 | Krishna et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6976205 | Ziai et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6982583 | Yin et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7007103 | Pinkerton et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009985 | Black et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7062568 | Senevirathne et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7068601 | Abdelilah et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7181531 | Pinkerton et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190676 | Anderson, Sr. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7212534 | Kadambi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7239636 | Kadambi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7346701 | Elzur et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7362769 | Black et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366190 | Black et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376755 | Pandya | May 2008 | B2 |
7382790 | Warren et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7385972 | Black et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7397788 | Mies et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7397800 | Elzur | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7400639 | Madukkarumukumana et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7411959 | Elzur | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7411960 | Langley et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7430171 | Black et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433326 | Desai et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7515612 | Thompson | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7586850 | Warren et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7633949 | Zadikian et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
8116203 | Kadambi et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20010026553 | Gallant et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032265 | Tanaka | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037397 | Boucher et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020078265 | Frazier | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020085562 | Hufferd et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087723 | Williams et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089927 | Fischer et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089931 | Takada et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095519 | Philbrick et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103988 | Dornier | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020110087 | Zelig et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130692 | Hairapetian | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020174253 | Hayter et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020190770 | Yin et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194400 | Porterfield | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001646 | Hairapetian | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016628 | Kadambi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021229 | Kadambi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030038809 | Peng | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046330 | Hayes | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046418 | Raval et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061505 | Sperry et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067337 | Yin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079033 | Craft et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084185 | Pinkerton | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105977 | Brabson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030107996 | Black et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108050 | Black et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108058 | Black et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108060 | Black et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108061 | Black et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030118040 | Black et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030140124 | Burns | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030169753 | Black et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172342 | Elzur | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174720 | Black et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174721 | Black et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174722 | Black et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030198251 | Black et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204631 | Pinkerton et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204634 | Pinkerton et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227908 | Scoggins et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019652 | Freimuth et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040042458 | Elzur | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040042464 | Elzur et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040042483 | Elzur et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040042487 | Ossman | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044798 | Elzur et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062245 | Sharp | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040062275 | Siddabathuni | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081186 | Warren et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085972 | Warren et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040085994 | Warren et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093411 | Elzur et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040133713 | Elzur | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040227544 | Yin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050027911 | Hayter et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050160139 | Boucher et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165980 | Clayton et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050184765 | Hairapetian | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185654 | Zadikian et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050216597 | Shah et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050278459 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060165115 | Warren et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176094 | Hairapetian | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070170966 | Hairapetian | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171914 | Kadambi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070237163 | Kadambi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080025315 | Elzur | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080095182 | Elzur et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080151922 | Elzur et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080205421 | Black et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080276018 | Hayter et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298369 | Elzur | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090074408 | Black et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090128380 | Hairapetian | May 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0465090 | Apr 1996 | EP |
1039718 | Sep 2000 | EP |
0692892 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1345382 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1357721 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1460804 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1460805 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1460806 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1280302 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1280302 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1206075 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1537695 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2725573 | Apr 1996 | FR |
19940012105 | Mar 2012 | FR |
1188301 | Jan 1984 | JP |
8331124 | Dec 1996 | JP |
H10283153 | Oct 1998 | JP |
10313314 | Nov 1998 | JP |
3237553 | Dec 2001 | JP |
9728505 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9900948 | Jan 1999 | WO |
0056013 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0056113 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0186910 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0235784 | May 2002 | WO |
03079612 | Sep 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Plaintiff Broadcom Corporation's Opening Markman Brief, United States Districk Court, Central District of California, Southern Division, Broad com Corporation v. Elulex Corporation, Case No. SACV09-01 058 JVS (ANx), SACV10-03963-JVS (ANx), dated Oct. 18, 2010. |
Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Emulex Corporation's Opening Claim Construction Brief, United States District Court, Central District of California, Broadcom Corporation v. Emulex Corporation, Case No. SACV09-1058-JVS (ANx) consilidated with CV 10-3963 JVS (ANx), dated Oct. 18, 2010. |
Plaintiff Broadcom Corporation's Reply Markman Brief, United States District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division, Broadcom Corporation v. Emu lex Corporation, Case No. SACV09-01058 JVS (ANx), SACV 1003963-JVS (ANx), dated Nov. 8, 2010. |
Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Emulex Corporation's Reply Claim Construction Brief, United States District Court, Central District of California, Broad com Corporation v. Emu lex Corporation, Case No. SACV 09-1 058-JVS (ANx) consolidated with CV 10-3963 JVS (ANx), dated Nov. 8, 2010. |
Order Regarding Markman/Ciaim Construction Hearing, United States District Court, Central District of California, Broadcom Corporation v. Emulex Corporation, Case No. SACV 09-01058-JVS (ANx) consolidated SACV 10-03963JVS (Anx), dated Dec. 17, 2010. |
Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Patent L.R. 4-3, United States District Court, Central District, Southern Division, Broadcom Corporation v. Emulex Corporation, Case No. SACV09-1058 JVS (ANx), SACV 1 0-03963-Jvs (ANx), Sep. 24, 2010. |
Exhibit A: Disputed Terms, Proposed Constructions, and Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evidence, Broadcom Corporation v. Emulex Corporation, Case No. 8:09-CV-01058-JVS-AN, Sep. 2010. |
JK Roussos et al., Congestion Control Protocols for Interconnected LANs Supporting Voice and Data Traffic, Computer Communications, Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands, vol. 17, No. 1 Dec. 1994, pp. 25-34, XP000415044. |
M. Aydemir et al., Flow Control in GBS Ethernet Networks, IEEE Exec Study Group on QOS and Flow Control, Nov. 11, 1998, pp. 1-31, XP002258501. |
Lucent Technologies, 3GPP TSG-SA2 Drafting Session, S2-002211, Nov. 29-30, 2000, p. 1. |
3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; IP Multimedia (IM) Subsystem—Stage 2 (3G TS 23.228 version 1.4.0), Nov. 2000, clean text version, pp. 1-102. |
3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; IP Multimedia (IM) Subsystem—Stage 2 (3G TS 23.228 version 1.4.0), Nov. 2000, diff-marked text version, pp. 1-116. |
3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; IP Multimedia (IM) Subsystem—Stage 2 (3G TS 23.228 version 1.7.0), Feb. 2001, marked text version, pp. 1-132. |
3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; IP Multimedia (IM) Subsystem—Stage 2 (3G TS 23.228 version 5.0.0) Apr. 2001, pp. 1-126. |
Index of /flp/Specs/archive/23—series/23.228, date retrieved Oct. 19, 2009, document available at http://www.3gpp.org!flp/Specs/archive/23—series/23.228/ . |
Ewen, “Single-Chip 1062 Mbaud CMOS Transceiver for Serial Data Communication,” 1995 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Digest of Technical Papers, First Edition, Feb. 1995, pp. 1-2,6013, 32-33,36, IEEE Catalog No. 95CH35753, Publisher: John H. Wuorinen, Castine, ME 04421. |
Fiedler, “A 1.0625Gbps Transceiver with 2x-Oversampling and Transmit Signal Pre-Emphasis”, Dec. 1997 IEEE International Solid-Slate Circuits Conference, Digest of Technical Papers, ISSCC97, Session 15, Serial Data Communications, Paper FP 15.1, pp. 238-239, 464. |
Fujimori, “A 90-dB SNR 2.5 MHz Output-Rate ADC Using Cascaded Mullibil Delta-Sigma Modulation at 8x Oversampling Ratio”, IEEE Journal of Solid-Slate Circuits, vol. 35, No. 12, Dec. 2000, pp. 1820-1828. |
Corner, “A CMOS Phase Detector for Mixed Signal ASIC Application”, IEEE Dec. 1993, pp. 232-234. |
Fiedler, “A CMOS Pulse Density Modulator for High-Resolution AID Converters”, IEEE Journal of Solid-Slate Circuits, vol. sc-19, No. 6, Dec. 1984, pp. 995-996. |
Momtaz, “A Fully Integrated SONET OC-48 Transceiver in Standard CMOS”, IEEE Journal of Solid-Slate Circuits, vol. 36, No. 12, Dec. 2001, pp. 1964-1973. |
Hairapetian, “An 81-MHz IF Receiver in CMOS”, IEEE Journal of Solid-Slate Circuits, vol. 31, No. 12, Dec. 1996, pp. 1981-1986. |
Fischer, “CiNIC—Calpoly Intelligent NIC”, A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, Jun. 2001, pp. i-xi, 1-137, Dec. 2001. |
Allstot, “Current-Mode Logic Techniques for CMOS Mixed-Mode ASIC's”, IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, Dec. 1991, pp. 25.1.1-25.2.4. |
Shivam, “EMP: Zero-Copy OS-bypass NIC-Driven Gigabit Ethernet Message Passing”, SC1 001 Nov. 2001, Denver, CO. |
Nayfeh, “Exploring the Design Space for a Shared-Cache Multiprocessor”, Computer Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, IEEE, Dec. 1994, pp. 166-175. |
Fibre Channel Arbitration Loop (FC-AL), X3.262-199x, X3T11/Project 960D/Rev. 4.5, working draft proposal, American National Standard for Information Technology, Jun. 1, 1995, pp. i-x, 1-92. |
Fibre Channel Physical and Signaling Interface (FC-PH), X3.230-199x, X3T11 Project 755D/Rev. 4.3, working draft proposal, American National Standard for Information Systems, Jun. 1, 1994, pp. i-xxxiv, 1-338, Index. |
Yeh, “Introduction to TCP/IP Offload Engine (TOA)”, 10 Gigabit Ethernet Alliance, Version 1.0, Apr. 2002. |
Sanchez, “Iterations in TCP/IP—Ethernet Network Optimization”, A Master's Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California, Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, Jun. 1999, pp. i-xiii, 1-156. |
Allam, “Low Power CMOS Logic Families”, IEEE, Dec. 1999, pp. 419-422. |
Hairaperian, “Low-Temperature Mobility Measurements on CMOS Devices”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 36, No. 8, Aug. 1448-1455, Aug. 1998. |
Cao, “OC-192 Transmitter and Receiver in Standard 0.18-um CMOS”, IEEE Journal of Solid-Slate Circuits, vol. 37, No. 12, Dec. 2002, pp. 1768-1780. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems, Infrastructure of Audiovisual Services—Services and Terminal Equipment for Audiovisual Services; Visual Telephone Systems and Equipment for Local Area Networks Which Provide a Non-Guaranteed Quality of Services, ITU-T Recommendation H.323, Superseded by a more recent version, Nov. 1996, pp. i-v, 1-71, 1. |
Pinkerton, “The Case for RDMA”, May 29, 2002, pp. 1-27. |
Pope, “Tip of the Week: Net-Interface Accelerators Can Help or Hinder”, Network System Design Line, Feb. 26, 2007, http://www.networksystemdesignline.com, pp. 1-2. |
Dally, “Virtual-Channel Flow Control”, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 3, No. 2, Mar. 1992, pp. 194-205. |
R. Seifert, Gigabit Ethernet (Addison-Wesley Dec. 1998). |
H. Frazier, “The 802.3z Gigabit Ethernet Standard”, LAN MAN Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society (May/Jun. 1998). |
Kadambi et al., Gigabit Ethernet: Migrating to High-Band LANs (Pretice Hall Dec. 1999). |
K. Yoshigoe and K. Christensen, “RATE Control for Bandwidth Allocated Services in IEEE 802.3 Ethernet,” LCN archive—Proceedings of the 26th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (Dec. 2001). |
J. Dunlop, “Techniques for the Integration of Packet Voice and Data on IEEE 802.3 LANs,” Computer Communications vol. 12, Issue 5 (Oct. 1989). |
IEEE Link Task Force Autodetect, “Spedification for Nway Autodetect,” Version 1.0 (Apr. 10, 1994). |
R. Cummings et al., “Fiber Channel Physical and Signaling Interface (FC-PH) Rev. 4.3,” American National Standard for Information Systems (Jun. 1, 1994). |
W. Rickard, Fibre Channel As a Network Backbone, WESCON/94, Idea/Microelectronics, Conference Record (Sep. 27-29, 1994). |
I. Crayford, “Fast Ethernet Gets Plug-and-Play,” Westcon Conference, IEEE Center, Hoes Lane, US, pp. 354-359 (Nov. 7, 1995). |
Newman et al., “Flow Labeled IP A Connectionless Approach to ATM,” INFOCOM '96, Fifteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer Societies, Networking the Next Generation, IEEE Proceedings (Dec. 1996). |
IEEE Standard 802.3x-1997, “Specification for 802.3 Full Duplex Operation”. |
E. Varvarigos and V. Sharma, “The Ready-to-Go Virtual Circuit Protocol: A Loss Free Protocol for Multigigabit Networks Using FIFO Buffers,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 5, issue 5 (1997). |
P. Montessoro and D. Pierattoni, “A New Approach for Future Network Architecture Design,” Proceedings of SSGRR 2001 (Aug. 2001). |
W. Noureddine and F. Tobagi, “Selective Back-Pressure in Switched Ethernet LASs”, Global Telecommunications Conference, GLOBECOM '99 (1999), pp. 1256-1263, vol. 1 (1999). |
J. Kurose and K. Ross, Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (Addison-Wesley 2001). |
M. Ragagopal et al., “IP and ARP over Fibre Channel,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 2625 (Jun. 1999). |
K.S. Teow, “Definitions of Managed Objects for the Fabric Element in Fibre Channel Standard,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 2837 (May 2000). |
M. Seaman et al., Integrated Service Mappings on IEEE 802 Networks Working Group, Request for Comments: 2815 (May 2000). |
3rd Generation Partnership Project: Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; IP Multimedia (1M) System—Stage 2; (3G TS 23,228 version 2.0.0) (2001) |
IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Supplements to Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMAICD) Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications—Specifications for 802.3 Full Duplex Operation and Physical Layer Specification for 100 Mb/s Operation on Two Pairs of Category 3 or Better Balanced Twisted Pair Cable (100 BASE-T2) IEEE Std. 802.3x-1997 and IEEE Std. 802.3y-1997, Supplements to ISO IEC 8802.3; 1996 [ANS/IEEE Std. 802.3, 1996 Edition]. |
Defendant Emu lex Corporation's Disclosure of Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, with Exhibit A, Broadcom Corporation vs. Emulex Corporation, Case No, SACV 09-1058-JVS (ANx), Jun. 28, 2010. |
Defendant Emu lex Corporation's First Amended Disclosure of Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, with Exhibit A, Broadcom Corporation vs. Emulex Corporation, Case No. SACV 09-1058-JVS (ANx), Aug. 30, 2010. |
Emulex Corporation's Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims, Demand for Jury Trial, Broadcom Corporation vs. Emulex Corporation, Case No. SACV 09-1058-JVS (ANx), Nov. 4, 2009. |
Excerpts from EP02014915 File History as cited in Emu lex Corporation's Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims, Demand for Jury Trial, Broadcom Corporation vs. Emu lex Corporation, Case No. SACV 09-1 058-JVS (ANx), Nov. 4, 2009. |
Non-Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/173,422, mailed on Jun. 28, 2006, 25 pages. |
Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. 10/173,422, mailed on Oct. 24, 2006, 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance Received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/173,422, mailed on Mar. 7, 2007, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance Received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/173,421, mailed on Dec. 29, 2006, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 11/806,427, mailed on Jul. 20, 2009, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130301410 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60306870 | Jul 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13006968 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 13943291 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11806427 | May 2007 | US |
Child | 13006968 | US | |
Parent | 10173422 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 11806427 | US |