Multiple-size support for X-ray window

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8929515
  • Patent Number
    8,929,515
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 6, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 6, 2015
    10 years ago
Abstract
An x-ray window including a support frame with a perimeter and an aperture. A plurality of ribs can extend across the aperture of the support frame and can be supported or carried by the support frame. Openings exist between ribs to allow transmission of x-rays through such openings with no attenuation of x-rays by the ribs. A film can be disposed over and span the ribs and openings. The ribs can have at least two different cross-sectional sizes including at least one larger sized rib with a cross-sectional area that is at least 5% larger than a cross-sectional area of at least one smaller sized rib.
Description
BACKGROUND

X-ray windows can be used for enclosing an x-ray source or detection device. The window can be used to separate air from a vacuum within the enclosure while allowing passage of x-rays through the window.


X-ray windows can include a thin film supported by a support structure, typically comprised of ribs supported by a frame. The support structure can be used to minimize sagging or breaking of the thin film. The support structure can interfere with the passage of x-rays and thus it can be desirable for ribs to be as thin or narrow as possible while still maintaining sufficient strength to hold the thin film. The support structure is normally expected to be strong enough to withstand a differential pressure of around 1 atmosphere without sagging or breaking.


Information relevant to x-ray windows can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,933,557, 7,737,424, 7,709,820, 7,756,251 and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/756,962, 12/783,707, 13/018,667, 61/408,472 all incorporated herein by reference.


SUMMARY

It has been recognized that it would be advantageous to provide a support structure for an x-ray window that is strong but also minimizes attenuation of x-rays. The present invention is directed to an x-ray window that satisfies the need for strength and minimal attenuation of x-rays by providing larger ribs for strength of the overall structure which support smaller ribs. The smaller ribs allow for reduced attenuation of x-rays. The x-ray window can comprise a support frame with a perimeter and an aperture. A plurality of ribs can extend across the aperture of the support frame and can be supported or carried by the support frame. Openings exist between ribs to allow transmission of x-rays through such openings with no attenuation of x-rays by the ribs. A film can be disposed over and span the ribs and openings. The film can be configured to pass radiation therethrough, such as by selecting a film material and thickness for optimal transmission of x-rays. The ribs can have at least two different cross-sectional sizes including at least one larger sized rib with a cross-sectional area that is at least 5% larger than a cross-sectional area of at least one smaller sized rib.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of an x-ray window, showing a thin film supported by a support structure, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a schematic top view of an x-ray window support structure, with some ribs having a larger cross-sectional area and other ribs having a smaller cross-sectional area, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a schematic top view of an x-ray window support structure, with some ribs having a larger cross-sectional area and other ribs having a smaller cross-sectional area, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a schematic top view of an x-ray window support structure, with some ribs having a larger cross-sectional area and other ribs having a smaller cross-sectional area, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a schematic top view of an x-ray window support structure, with some ribs having a larger cross-sectional area and other ribs having a smaller cross-sectional area, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6 is a schematic top view of an x-ray window support structure, with some ribs having a larger cross-sectional area and other ribs having a smaller cross-sectional area, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 7 is a schematic top view of an x-ray window support structure, with some ribs having a larger cross-sectional area and other ribs having a smaller cross-sectional area, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 8 is a schematic top view of an x-ray window support structure, with some ribs having a larger cross-sectional area and other ribs having a smaller cross-sectional area, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 9 is a schematic top view of an x-ray window support structure, with some ribs having a larger cross-sectional area and other ribs having a smaller cross-sectional area, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 10 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of an x-ray detector and x-ray window, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 11 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of an x-ray tube and x-ray window, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 12 is schematic cross-sectional side view of an x-ray window, showing a thin film supported by a support structure, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





DEFINITIONS





    • As used herein, the term “about” is used to provide flexibility to a numerical range or value by providing that a given value may be “a little above” or “a little below” the endpoint.

    • As used herein, the term rib “cross-sectional area” means the rib width times the rib height.

    • As used herein, the term “linear” or “linearly”, as referring to the rib pattern, means that the rib or ribs extends substantially straight, without bends or curves, as the rib extends across the aperture of the support frame. “Non-linear” means that the rib does bend or curve.

    • As used herein, the terms “larger ribs,” “larger rib,” “largest ribs,” and “largest rib” mean larger or largest in cross-sectional area of the ribs, and does not refer to the length of the ribs.

    • As used herein, the terms “smaller ribs,” “smaller rib,” “smallest ribs,” and “smallest rib” mean smaller or smallest in cross-sectional area of the ribs, and does not refer to the length of the ribs.

    • As used herein, the term “substantially” refers to the complete or nearly complete extent or degree of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. For example, an object that is “substantially” enclosed would mean that the object is either completely enclosed or nearly completely enclosed. The exact allowable degree of deviation from absolute completeness may in some cases depend on the specific context. However, generally speaking the nearness of completion will be so as to have the same overall result as if absolute and total completion were obtained. The use of “substantially” is equally applicable when used in a negative connotation to refer to the complete or near complete lack of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will be used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Alterations and further modifications of the inventive features illustrated herein, and additional applications of the principles of the inventions as illustrated herein, which would occur to one skilled in the relevant art and having possession of this disclosure, are to be considered within the scope of the invention.


As illustrated in FIG. 1, an x-ray window 10 is shown comprising a support frame 12 with a perimeter and an aperture 15. A plurality of ribs 11 can extend across the aperture 15 of the support frame 12 and can be supported or carried by the support frame 12. Openings 14 exist between ribs 11 to allow transmission of x-rays through such openings with no attenuation of x-rays by the ribs 11. A film 13 can be disposed over and span the ribs 11 and openings 14. The film 13 can be carried by the ribs 11. The film 13 can contact the ribs 11.


The film 13 can be configured to pass radiation therethrough, such as by selecting a film material and thickness for optimal transmission of x-rays. The ribs 11 can have at least two different cross-sectional sizes including at least one larger sized rib with a cross-sectional area that is at least 5% larger than a cross-sectional area of at least one smaller sized rib. This design with some ribs having a larger cross sectional area and other ribs having a smaller cross sectional area can have high strength provided by the larger ribs while allowing for minimal attenuation of x-rays by use of smaller ribs.


The change in cross-sectional area between larger and smaller ribs can be accomplished by a change in rib width w and/or a change in rib height h. For example, in FIG. 1, rib 11b has a width w2 that is greater than a width w1 of rib 11a, but both ribs have approximately equal heights h1, and thus rib 11b has a greater cross-sectional area than rib 11a. As another example, rib 11c has a height h2 that is greater than a height h1 of rib 11a, but both ribs have approximately equal widths w1, and thus rib 11c has a greater cross-sectional area than rib 11a. As another example, rib 11d has a height h3 that is greater than a height h1 of rib 11a and a width w3 that is greater than a width w1 of rib 11a, and thus rib 11d has a greater cross-sectional area than rib 11a. As another example not shown, one rib may have a greater width, but a lesser height, than another rib. Whichever rib has a greater value of width times height has a greater cross-sectional area.


In the various embodiments described herein, tops of the ribs 11 can terminate substantially in a common plane 16. “Tops of the ribs” is defined as the location on the ribs 11 to which the film 13 is attached. It can be beneficial for tops of the ribs 11 to terminate substantially in a common plane 16 to allow for a substantially flat film 13.



FIGS. 2-9 show schematic top views of x-ray window support structures, with some ribs having a larger cross-sectional area and other ribs having a smaller cross-sectional area. Ribs with a smallest cross-sectional area are designated as 11e, ribs with a larger cross-sectional area than ribs 11e are designated as 11f, ribs with a larger cross-sectional area than ribs 11f are designated as 11g, ribs with a larger cross-sectional area than ribs 11g are designated as 11h, and ribs with a larger cross-sectional area than ribs 11h are designated as 11i. Ribs with larger cross-sectional area are shown with wider lines. A wider line does not necessarily mean that the rib is wider, only that the cross-sectional area is larger, which may be accomplished by a larger width, a larger height, or both, than another rib.


In one embodiment, each larger sized rib can have a cross-sectional area that is at least 5% larger than a cross-sectional area of smaller sized ribs









Area





of





larger





rib

-

Area





of





smaller





rib



Area





of





smaller





rib


>

0.05
.






In another embodiment, each larger sized rib can have a cross-sectional area that is at least 10% larger than a cross-sectional area of smaller sized ribs. In another embodiment, each larger sized rib can have a cross-sectional area that is at least 25% larger than a cross-sectional area of smaller sized ribs. In another embodiment, each larger sized rib can have a cross-sectional area that is at least 50% larger than a cross-sectional area of smaller sized ribs. In another embodiment, each larger sized rib can have a cross-sectional area that is at least twice as large as a cross-sectional area of smaller sized ribs. In another embodiment, each larger sized rib can have a cross-sectional area that is at least four times as large as a cross-sectional area of smaller sized ribs.


Some figures show only two different cross-sectional area size ribs, but more cross-sectional area sizes are within the scope of the present invention and are only excluded from the figures for simplicity. Also, more than the five different cross-sectional area size ribs shown are within the scope of the present invention and are only excluded from the figures for simplicity.


As illustrated in FIG. 2, an x-ray window 20 is shown with ribs 11e-g having at least three different cross-sectional areas. The smallest ribs 11e are formed into repeating hexagonal shapes and define hexagonal-shaped openings. The next larger ribs 11f are formed into repeating structures comprising seven of the small hexagonal shapes. The pattern of the larger ribs 11f can be aligned with the part of the hexagonal pattern of the smaller sized ribs 11e.


Larger ribs 11g can extend across the aperture of the support frame 12 to provide extra strength to the smaller sized ribs 11e-f. The pattern of the larger ribs 11g can be aligned with part of the pattern of the smaller sized ribs 11e-f. The ribs 11e-f can extend non-linearly across the aperture of the support frame 12.


As illustrated in FIG. 3, an x-ray window 30 is shown with ribs 11e-f having at least two different cross-sectional areas. The smallest ribs 11e are formed into repeating hexagonal shapes and define hexagonal-shaped openings. The larger ribs 11f provide extra strength to the smaller sized ribs 11e. The ribs 11e-f can extend non-linearly across the aperture of the support frame 12. The pattern of the larger ribs 11f can be aligned with part of the hexagonal pattern of the smaller sized ribs 11e.


As illustrated in FIG. 4, an x-ray window 40 is shown with ribs 11e-f having at least two different cross-sectional areas. The smallest ribs 11e are formed into repeating hexagonal shapes and define hexagonal-shaped openings. The larger ribs 11f extend across the aperture of the support frame 12, in a cross-shape, to provide extra strength to the smaller sized ribs 11e. The larger-sized ribs 11f, along with the support frame, separate the smaller sized ribs 11e into separate and discrete sections 43a-d. Note that the smaller sized ribs 11e extend non-linearly across the aperture of the support frame 12 while larger sized ribs 11f extend linearly across the support frame 12. A portion of the pattern of the larger sized ribs 11f can be aligned with a portion of a pattern of the smaller sized ribs 11e, such as at location 44. This alignment can optimize strength by continuing with the larger ribs 11f, a portion of a pattern of the smaller ribs 11e.


As illustrated in FIG. 5, an x-ray window 50 is shown with ribs 11e-f having at least two different cross-sectional areas and defining hexagonal-shaped openings. The smallest ribs 11e are formed into repeating hexagonal shapes. The larger ribs 11f extend across the aperture of the support frame 12 to provide extra strength to the smaller sized ribs 11e. The ribs 11e-f can extend non-linearly across the aperture of the support frame 12.


As illustrated in FIG. 6, an x-ray window 60 is shown with ribs 11e-f having at least two different cross-sectional areas. The smallest ribs 11e are formed into repeating hexagonal shapes and define hexagonal-shaped openings. The larger ribs 11f extend across the aperture of the support frame 12 to provide extra strength to the smaller sized ribs 11e. The larger-sized ribs 11f, along with the support frame, separate the smaller sized ribs 11e into separate and discrete sections 63a-c. The ribs 11e-f can extend non-linearly across the aperture of the support frame 12.


As illustrated in FIG. 7, an x-ray window 70 is shown with ribs 11e-f having at least two different cross-sectional areas. The smallest ribs 11e are formed into repeating hexagonal shapes and define hexagonal-shaped openings. The larger ribs 11f extend across the aperture of the support frame 12 to provide extra strength to the smaller sized ribs 11e. The ribs 11e-f can extend non-linearly across the aperture of the support frame 12.


As illustrated in FIG. 8, an x-ray window 80 is shown with substantially parallel ribs 11e-i having at least five different cross-sectional areas. The ribs 11e-i extend linearly from one side of the support frame to an opposing side of the support frame 12. At least one of the larger sized ribs 11i can have a longer length than all smaller sized ribs 11e-h. Also, at least one of the larger sized ribs 11i can span a greater distance across the aperture of the support frame 12 than all smaller sized ribs.


As illustrated in FIG. 9, an x-ray window 90 is shown with ribs 11e-h having at least four different cross-sectional areas. Some of the ribs 11e-h are substantially parallel with respect to each other and some of the ribs 11e-h ribs intersect one another. The intersecting ribs 11e-h can be oriented non-perpendicularly with respect to each other and can define non-rectangular openings 14.


As illustrated in FIG. 10, an x-ray detection system 100 is shown comprising an x-ray window 101 hermetically sealed a mount 102. The x-ray window 101 can be one of the various x-ray window embodiments described herein. An x-ray detector 103 can also be attached to the mount 102. The window 101 can be configured to allow x-rays 104 to impinge upon the detector 103. This may be accomplished by selection of window materials and support structure size to allow for transmission of x-rays and orienting the window 101 and detector 103 such that x-rays 104 passing through the window 101 will impinge upon the detector 103.


As illustrated in FIG. 11, an x-ray source 110 is shown comprising a hermetically sealed enclosure formed by an x-ray window 111, an x-ray tube 114, a cathode 112, and possibly other components not shown. An electron emitter 113 can emit electrons 115 towards the window 111 and the window 111 can be configured to emit x-rays 116 in response to impinging electrons, the x-rays 116 can exit the x-ray source 110. The x-ray window 111 can be one of the various x-ray window embodiments described herein and can have a coating of target material, such as silver or gold, to allow for production of the desired energy of x-rays 116.


As illustrated in FIG. 12, an x-ray window 120 is shown with a portion of the support frame 12 and a portion of the ribs 11 all disposed in a single plane 126. The plane 126 can be substantially parallel with the film 13 and can have a thickness 127 of less than 5 micrometers.


How to Make:


The film 13 can be comprised of a material that will result in minimal attenuation of x-rays and/or minimal contamination of the x-ray signal passed through to an x-ray detector or sensor. The film can be comprised of a polymer, graphene, diamond, beryllium, or other suitable material. The window can have a gas barrier film layer disposed over the film. The gas barrier film layer can comprise boron hydride. The film can be attached to the support structure by an adhesive.


The support structure can be comprised of a polymer (including a photosensitive polymer such as a photosensitive polyimide), silicon, graphene, diamond, beryllium, carbon composite, or other suitable material. The support structure can be formed by pattern and etch, ink jet printer or inkjet technology, or laser mill or laser ablation.


In one embodiment, ribs can have a width w between 25 μm and 75 μm and a height h between 25 μm and 75 μm.


In one embodiment, largest ribs can have a width w between about 50 μm and about 250 μm. In another embodiment, smallest ribs can have a width w between about 8 μm and about 30 μm. In another embodiment, intermediate sized ribs can have a width w between about 20 μm and about 50 μm. All ribs in this described in this paragraph can have the same height h or they can be different heights h. All ribs in this described in this paragraph can have heights h as described in the following paragraph.


In one embodiment, largest ribs can have a height h between about 20 μm and about 300 μm. In another embodiment, smallest ribs can have a height h between about 20 μm and about 60 μm. In another embodiment, intermediate sized ribs can have a height h between about 20 μm and about 100 μm. All ribs in this described in this paragraph can have the same width w or they can be different widths. All ribs in this described in this paragraph can have widths as described in the previous paragraph.


In one embodiment, openings 14 between the ribs 11 can take up about 81% to about 90% of a total area within the aperture of the support frame 12. In another embodiment, openings 14 between the ribs 11 can take up about 71% to about 80% of a total area within the aperture of the support frame 12. In another embodiment, openings 14 between the ribs 11 can take up about 91% to about 96% of a total area within the aperture of the support frame 12. Opening 14 area can be dependent on the width w and height h of the ribs 11, the pattern of the ribs, and the number of different sizes of ribs.


It is to be understood that the above-referenced arrangements are only illustrative of the application for the principles of the present invention. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements can be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. While the present invention has been shown in the drawings and fully described above with particularity and detail in connection with what is presently deemed to be the most practical and preferred embodiment(s) of the invention, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications can be made without departing from the principles and concepts of the invention as set forth herein.

Claims
  • 1. A window for allowing transmission of x-rays, comprising: a) a support frame defining a perimeter and an aperture;b) a plurality of ribs extending across the aperture of the support frame and carried by the support frame;c) openings between the plurality of ribs;d) a film disposed over, carried by, and spanning the plurality of ribs and openings and configured to pass radiation therethrough;e) the plurality of ribs having at least two different cross-sectional sizes including at least one larger sized rib and at least one smaller sized rib;f) the at least one larger sized rib has a widthwise cross-sectional area across the aperture of the support frame that is at least 5% larger than a widthwise cross-sectional area of the at least one smaller sized rib; andg) the window being hermetically sealed to an enclosure configured to enclose an x-ray source or detection device in order to separate air from a vacuum within the enclosure.
  • 2. The window of claim 1, wherein the at least one larger sized rib has a cross-sectional area that is at least 50% larger than a cross-sectional area of the at least one smaller sized rib.
  • 3. The window of claim 1, wherein the at least one larger sized rib has a cross-sectional area that is at least twice as large as a cross-sectional area of the at least one smaller sized rib.
  • 4. The window of claim 1, wherein the plurality of ribs include at least three different sizes and each larger size has a cross-sectional area that is at least 5% larger than a cross-sectional area of a smaller sized rib.
  • 5. The window of claim 1, wherein the plurality of ribs include at least four different sizes and each larger size has a cross-sectional area that is at least 5% larger than a cross-sectional area of a smaller sized rib.
  • 6. The window of claim 1, wherein the plurality of ribs form multiple hexagonal-shaped structures and define hexagonal-shaped openings.
  • 7. The window of claim 1, wherein the plurality of ribs extend from one side of the support frame to an opposing side and are substantially parallel with respect to each other.
  • 8. The window of claim 1, wherein the plurality of ribs intersect one another.
  • 9. The window of claim 8, wherein the plurality of ribs are oriented non-perpendicularly with respect to each other and define non-rectangular openings.
  • 10. The window of claim 1, wherein at least one larger sized rib has a longer length than all smaller sized ribs.
  • 11. The window of claim 1, wherein at least one larger sized rib spans a greater distance across the aperture of the support frame than all smaller sized ribs.
  • 12. The window of claim 1, wherein the plurality of ribs extend non-linearly across the aperture of the support frame.
  • 13. The window of claim 1, wherein the at least one larger sized rib along with the support frame separate the at least one smaller sized rib into separate and discrete sections.
  • 14. The window of claim 1, wherein tops of the plurality of ribs terminate substantially in a common plane.
  • 15. The window of claim 1, wherein a pattern of the at least one larger sized rib is aligned with a portion of a pattern of the at least one smaller sized rib.
  • 16. The window of claim 1, wherein a portion of a pattern of the at least one larger sized rib is aligned with a portion of a pattern of the at least one smaller sized rib.
  • 17. The window of claim 1, wherein the at least one larger sized rib has a larger width than the at least one smaller sized rib.
  • 18. The window of claim 1, wherein a portion of the support frame and a portion of the plurality of ribs are disposed in a single plane, having a thickness of less than 5 micrometers, which is substantially parallel with the film.
  • 19. The window of claim 1, wherein the film contacts the plurality of ribs.
  • 20. The window of claim 1, wherein: a) the window is hermetically sealed to a mount;b) the mount is attached to an x-ray detector; andc) the window is configured to allow x-rays to impinge upon the detector.
  • 21. The window of claim 1, wherein: a) the window is hermetically sealed to an enclosure including an x-ray source, the enclosure being partially formed by the window and an x-ray tube; andb) the window is configured to allow x-rays to exit the x-ray source.
  • 22. The window of claim 1, wherein the cross-section of the at least one larger sized rib extends along an entire length of the at least one larger sized rib.
  • 23. The window of claim 1, wherein a larger cross-section of the at least one larger sized rib is larger than a smaller cross-section of the at least one smaller sized rib along a majority of a length of the at least one smaller sized rib across the aperture of the support frame.
  • 24. The window of claim 1, wherein the at least one smaller sized rib has a smaller cross-section along at least a majority of a length of the at least one smaller sized rib across the aperture of the support frame.
  • 25. A window for allowing transmission of x-rays, comprising: a) a support frame defining a perimeter and an aperture;b) a plurality of ribs extending across the aperture of the support frame and carried by the support frame, the plurality of ribs having openings therebetween;c) the plurality of ribs having tops that terminate substantially in a common plane;d) a film disposed over and spanning the plurality of ribs and openings and configured to pass radiation therethrough;e) the plurality of ribs having at least two different cross-sectional sizes including at least one larger sized rib and at least one smaller sized rib;f) the at least one larger sized rib has a widthwise cross-sectional area across the aperture of the support frame that is at least 50% larger than a widthwise cross-sectional area across the aperture of the support frame of the at least one smaller sized rib;g) the at least one larger sized rib has a longer length than all of the smaller sized ribs;h) the at least one larger sized rib spans a greater distance across an aperture of the support frame than at least one of the smaller sized ribs; andi) the window being hermetically sealed to an enclosure configured to enclose an x-ray source or detection device in order to separate air from a vacuum within the enclosure.
  • 26. A window for allowing transmission of x-rays, the window comprising: a) a support frame defining a perimeter and an aperture;b) a plurality of ribs extending across the aperture of the support frame and carried by the support frame, the plurality of ribs having openings therebetween;c) the plurality of ribs terminate substantially in a common plane;d) a film disposed over and spanning the plurality of ribs and openings and configured to pass radiation therethrough;e) the plurality of ribs having at least two different cross-sectional sizes including at least one larger sized rib and at least one smaller sized rib;f) the at least one larger sized rib has a widthwise cross-sectional area that is at least 5% larger than a widthwise cross-sectional area of the at least one smaller sized rib, a larger widthwise cross-section of the at least one larger sized rib extending across the aperture of the support frame and along an entire length of the at least one larger sized rib, a smaller widthwise cross-section of the smaller sized rib being smaller along at least a majority of a length of the at least one smaller sized rib across the aperture of the support frame; andg) the window being hermetically sealed to a mount, the mount being further hermetically sealed to either an x-ray source or a detector in order to form a hermetically sealed enclosure.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/445,878, filed Feb. 23, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (244)
Number Name Date Kind
1276706 Snook et al. May 1918 A
1881448 Forde et al. Oct 1932 A
1946288 Kearsley Feb 1934 A
2291948 Cassen Aug 1942 A
2316214 Atlee et al. Apr 1943 A
2329318 Atlee et al. Sep 1943 A
2340363 Atlee et al. Feb 1944 A
2502070 Atlee et al. Mar 1950 A
2663812 Jamison et al. Mar 1950 A
2683223 Hosemann Jul 1954 A
2952790 Steen Sep 1960 A
3397337 Denholm Aug 1968 A
3538368 Oess Nov 1970 A
3665236 Gaines et al. May 1972 A
3679927 Kirkendall Jul 1972 A
3691417 Gralenski Sep 1972 A
3741797 Chavasse, Jr. et al. Jun 1973 A
3751701 Gralenski et al. Aug 1973 A
3801847 Dietz Apr 1974 A
3828190 Dahlin et al. Aug 1974 A
3873824 Bean et al. Mar 1975 A
3882339 Rate et al. May 1975 A
3962583 Holland et al. Jun 1976 A
3970884 Golden Jul 1976 A
4007375 Albert Feb 1977 A
4075526 Grubis Feb 1978 A
4160311 Ronde et al. Jul 1979 A
4163900 Warren et al. Aug 1979 A
4178509 More et al. Dec 1979 A
4184097 Auge Jan 1980 A
4250127 Warren et al. Feb 1981 A
4293373 Greenwood Oct 1981 A
4368538 McCorkle Jan 1983 A
4393127 Greschner et al. Jul 1983 A
4443293 Mallon et al. Apr 1984 A
4463257 Simpkins et al. Jul 1984 A
4463338 Utner et al. Jul 1984 A
4521902 Peugeot Jun 1985 A
4532150 Endo et al. Jul 1985 A
4573186 Reinhold Feb 1986 A
4576679 White Mar 1986 A
4584056 Perret et al. Apr 1986 A
4591756 Avnery May 1986 A
4608326 Neukermans et al. Aug 1986 A
4645977 Kurokawa et al. Feb 1987 A
4675525 Amingual et al. Jun 1987 A
4679219 Ozaki Jul 1987 A
4688241 Peugeot Aug 1987 A
4696994 Nakajima Sep 1987 A
4705540 Hayes Nov 1987 A
4777642 Ono Oct 1988 A
4797907 Anderton Jan 1989 A
4818806 Kunimune et al. Apr 1989 A
4819260 Haberrecker Apr 1989 A
4862490 Karnezos et al. Aug 1989 A
4870671 Hershyn Sep 1989 A
4876330 Higashi et al. Oct 1989 A
4878866 Mori et al. Nov 1989 A
4885055 Woodbury et al. Dec 1989 A
4891831 Tanaka et al. Jan 1990 A
4933557 Perkins et al. Jun 1990 A
4939763 Pinneo et al. Jul 1990 A
4957773 Spencer et al. Sep 1990 A
4960486 Perkins et al. Oct 1990 A
4969173 Valkonet Nov 1990 A
4979198 Malcolm et al. Dec 1990 A
4979199 Cueman et al. Dec 1990 A
5010562 Hernandez et al. Apr 1991 A
5063324 Grunwald et al. Nov 1991 A
5066300 Isaacson et al. Nov 1991 A
5077771 Skillicorn et al. Dec 1991 A
5077777 Daly Dec 1991 A
5090046 Friel Feb 1992 A
5105456 Rand et al. Apr 1992 A
5117829 Miller et al. Jun 1992 A
5153900 Nomikos et al. Oct 1992 A
5161179 Suzuki et al. Nov 1992 A
5173612 Imai et al. Dec 1992 A
5196283 Ikeda et al. Mar 1993 A
5217817 Verspui et al. Jun 1993 A
5226067 Allred et al. Jul 1993 A
RE34421 Parker et al. Oct 1993 E
5258091 Imai et al. Nov 1993 A
5267294 Kuroda et al. Nov 1993 A
5302523 Coffee et al. Apr 1994 A
5343112 Wegmann Aug 1994 A
5391958 Kelly Feb 1995 A
5392042 Pellon Feb 1995 A
5400385 Blake et al. Mar 1995 A
5422926 Smith et al. Jun 1995 A
5428658 Oettinger et al. Jun 1995 A
5432003 Plano et al. Jul 1995 A
5465023 Garner Nov 1995 A
5469429 Yamazaki et al. Nov 1995 A
5469490 Golden et al. Nov 1995 A
5478266 Kelly Dec 1995 A
5521851 Wei et al. May 1996 A
5524133 Neale et al. Jun 1996 A
5561342 Roeder et al. Oct 1996 A
RE35383 Miller et al. Nov 1996 E
5571616 Phillips et al. Nov 1996 A
5578360 Viitanen Nov 1996 A
5602507 Suzuki Feb 1997 A
5607723 Plano et al. Mar 1997 A
5621780 Smith et al. Apr 1997 A
5627871 Wang May 1997 A
5631943 Miles May 1997 A
5673044 Pellon Sep 1997 A
5680433 Jensen Oct 1997 A
5682412 Skillicorn et al. Oct 1997 A
5696808 Lenz Dec 1997 A
5706354 Stroehlein Jan 1998 A
5729583 Tang et al. Mar 1998 A
5740228 Schmidt et al. Apr 1998 A
5774522 Warburton Jun 1998 A
5812632 Schardt et al. Sep 1998 A
5835561 Moorman et al. Nov 1998 A
5870051 Warburton Feb 1999 A
5898754 Gorzen Apr 1999 A
5907595 Sommerer May 1999 A
6002202 Meyer et al. Dec 1999 A
6005918 Harris et al. Dec 1999 A
6044130 Inazura et al. Mar 2000 A
6062931 Chuang et al. May 2000 A
6063629 Knoblauch May 2000 A
6069278 Chuang May 2000 A
6073484 Miller et al. Jun 2000 A
6075839 Treseder Jun 2000 A
6097790 Hasegawa et al. Aug 2000 A
6129901 Moskovits et al. Oct 2000 A
6133401 Jensen Oct 2000 A
6134300 Trebes et al. Oct 2000 A
6184333 Gray Feb 2001 B1
6205200 Boyer et al. Mar 2001 B1
6277318 Bower Aug 2001 B1
6282263 Arndt et al. Aug 2001 B1
6288209 Jensen Sep 2001 B1
6307008 Lee et al. Oct 2001 B1
6320019 Lee et al. Nov 2001 B1
6351520 Inazaru Feb 2002 B1
6385294 Suzuki et al. May 2002 B2
6388359 Duelli et al. May 2002 B1
6438207 Chidester et al. Aug 2002 B1
6477235 Chornenky et al. Nov 2002 B2
6487272 Kutsuzawa Nov 2002 B1
6487273 Takenaka et al. Nov 2002 B1
6494618 Moulton Dec 2002 B1
6546077 Chornenky et al. Apr 2003 B2
6567500 Rother May 2003 B2
6645757 Okandan et al. Nov 2003 B1
6646366 Hell et al. Nov 2003 B2
6658085 Sklebitz Dec 2003 B2
6661876 Turner et al. Dec 2003 B2
6740874 Doring May 2004 B2
6778633 Loxley et al. Aug 2004 B1
6799075 Chornenky et al. Sep 2004 B1
6803570 Bryson, III et al. Oct 2004 B1
6816573 Hirano et al. Nov 2004 B2
6819741 Chidester Nov 2004 B2
6838297 Iwasaki Jan 2005 B2
6852365 Smart et al. Feb 2005 B2
6866801 Mau et al. Mar 2005 B1
6876724 Zhou Apr 2005 B2
6900580 Dai et al. May 2005 B2
6956706 Brandon Oct 2005 B2
6962782 Livache et al. Nov 2005 B1
6976953 Pelc Dec 2005 B1
6987835 Lovoi Jan 2006 B2
7035379 Turner et al. Apr 2006 B2
7046767 Okada et al. May 2006 B2
7049735 Ohkubo et al. May 2006 B2
7075699 Oldham et al. Jul 2006 B2
7085354 Kanagami Aug 2006 B2
7108841 Smally Sep 2006 B2
7130380 Lovoi et al. Oct 2006 B2
7130381 Lovoi et al. Oct 2006 B2
7189430 Ajayan et al. Mar 2007 B2
7203283 Puusaari Apr 2007 B1
7206381 Shimono et al. Apr 2007 B2
7215741 Ukita May 2007 B2
7224769 Turner May 2007 B2
7233071 Furukawa et al. Jun 2007 B2
7233647 Turner et al. Jun 2007 B2
7286642 Ishikawa et al. Oct 2007 B2
7305066 Ukita Dec 2007 B2
7358593 Smith et al. Apr 2008 B2
7382862 Bard et al. Jun 2008 B2
7399794 Harmon et al. Jul 2008 B2
7410603 Noguchi et al. Aug 2008 B2
7428298 Bard et al. Sep 2008 B2
7448801 Oettinger et al. Nov 2008 B2
7448802 Oettinger et al. Nov 2008 B2
7486774 Cain Feb 2009 B2
7526068 Dinsmore Apr 2009 B2
7529345 Bard et al. May 2009 B2
7618906 Meilahti Nov 2009 B2
7634052 Grodzins Dec 2009 B2
7649980 Aoki et al. Jan 2010 B2
7650050 Haffner et al. Jan 2010 B2
7657002 Burke et al. Feb 2010 B2
7680652 Giesbrecht et al. Mar 2010 B2
7684545 Damento et al. Mar 2010 B2
7693265 Hauttmann et al. Apr 2010 B2
7709820 Decker et al. May 2010 B2
7737424 Xu et al. Jun 2010 B2
7756251 Davis et al. Jul 2010 B2
20020075999 Rother Jun 2002 A1
20020094064 Zhou Jul 2002 A1
20030096104 Tobita et al. May 2003 A1
20030152700 Asmussen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030165418 Ajayan et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040076260 Charles, Jr. et al. Apr 2004 A1
20050018817 Oettinger et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050141669 Shimono et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050207537 Ukita Sep 2005 A1
20060073682 Furukawa et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060098778 Oettinger et al. May 2006 A1
20060233307 Dinsmore Oct 2006 A1
20060269048 Cain Nov 2006 A1
20070025516 Bard et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070087436 Miyawaki et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070111617 Meilahti May 2007 A1
20070133921 Haffner et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142781 Sayre Jun 2007 A1
20070165780 Durst et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070176319 Thostenson et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070183576 Burke et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080199399 Chen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080296479 Anderson et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080296518 Xu et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080317982 Hecht Dec 2008 A1
20090085426 Davis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090086923 Davis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090173897 Decker et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100096595 Prud'Homme et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100126660 O'Hara May 2010 A1
20100140497 Damiano, Jr. et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100239828 Cornaby et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100243895 Xu et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100248343 Aten et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100285271 Davis et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100323419 Aten et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110017921 Jiang et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110089330 Thoms Apr 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (36)
Number Date Country
1030936 May 1958 DE
4430623 Mar 1996 DE
19818057 Nov 1999 DE
0297808 Jan 1989 EP
0330456 Aug 1989 EP
0400655 May 1990 EP
0676772 Mar 1995 EP
1252290 Nov 1971 GB
57082954 Aug 1982 JP
S6074253 Jan 1985 JP
S6089054 May 1985 JP
3170673 Jul 1991 JP
05066300 Mar 1993 JP
5135722 Jun 1993 JP
06119893 Jul 1994 JP
6289145 Oct 1994 JP
6343478 Dec 1994 JP
8315783 Nov 1996 JP
2001179844 Jul 2001 JP
2003007237 Jan 2003 JP
2003088383 Mar 2003 JP
2003510236 Mar 2003 JP
20033211396 Jul 2003 JP
4171700 Jun 2006 JP
2006297549 Nov 2006 JP
10-2005-0107094 Nov 2005 KR
WO 96-19738 Jun 1996 WO
WO 9965821 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0009443 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0017102 Mar 2000 WO
WO 03076951 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2008052002 May 2008 WO
WO 2009009610 Jan 2009 WO
WO 2009045915 Apr 2009 WO
WO 2009085351 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2010107600 Sep 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (77)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 13/018,667, filed Feb. 1, 2011; Robert C. Davis;; office action issued Apr. 26, 2012.
Anderson et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/756,962, filed Jun. 1, 2007.
Barkan et al., “Improved window for low-energy x-ray transmission a Hybrid design for energy-dispersive microanalysis,” Sep. 1995, 2 pages, Ectroscopy 10(7).
Blanquart et al.; “XPAD, a New Read-out Pixel Chip for X-ray Counting”; IEEE Xplore; Mar. 25, 2009.
Chen, Xiaohua et al., “Carbon-nanotube metal-matrix composites prepared by electroless plating,” Composites Science and Technology, 2000, pp. 301-306, vol. 60.
Comfort, J. H., “Plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition of in situ doped epitaxial silicon at low temperatures,” J. Appl. Phys. 65, 1067 (1989).
Das, D. K., and K. Kumar, “Chemical vapor deposition of boron on a beryllium surface,” Thin Solid Films, 83(1), 53-60.
Das, K., and Kumar, K., “Tribological behavior of improved chemically vapor-deposited boron on beryllium,” Thin Solid Films, 108(2), 181-188.
Flahaut, E. et al, “Carbon Nanotube-metal-oxide nanocomposites; microstructure, electrical conductivity and mechanical properties,” Acta mater., 2000, pp. 3803-3812.Vo. 48.
Gevin, et al IDe-XV1.0: Performances of a New CMOS Multi channer Analogue Readout ASIC for Cd (Zn) Te Detectors; IEEE 2005.
Grybos et al.; “DEDIX—Development of Fully Integrated Multichannel ASIC for High Count Rate Digital X-ray Imagining systems”; IEEE 2006; Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.
Grybos, “Pole-Zero Cancellations Circuit With Pulse Pile-Up Tracking System for Low Noise Charge-Sensitive Amplifiers”; Mar. 25, 2009; from IEEE Xplore.
Grybos, et al “Measurements of Matching and High Count Rate Performance of Multichannel ASIC for Digital X-Ray Imaging Systems”; IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 54, No. 4, 2007.
Hanigofsky, J. A., K. L. More, and W. J. Lackey, “Composition and microstructure of chemically vapor-deposited boron nitride, aluminum nitride, and boron nitride + aluminum nitride composites,” J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 74, 301 (1991).
http://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/xraytubescollidge/MachelettCW250.htm, 1999, 2 pgs.
Hutchison, “Vertically aligned carbon nanotubes as a framework for microfabrication of high aspect ration mems,” 2008, pp. 1-50.
Jiang, et al; “Carbon nanotubes-metal nitride composites: a new class of nanocomposites with enhanced electrical properties”; Jun. 25, 2004 ; J. Mater. Chem, 2005.
Jiang, Linquin et al., “Carbon nanotubes-metal nitride composites; a new class of nanocomposites with enhanced electrical properties,” J. Mater. Chem., 2005, pp. 260-266, vol. 15.
Komatsu, S., and Y. Moriyoshi, “Influence of atomic hydrogen on the growth reactions of amorphous boron films in a low-pressure B.sub.2 H.sub.6 +He+H.sub.2 plasma”, J. Appl. Phys. 64, 1878 (1988).
Komatsu, S., and Y. Moriyoshi, “Transition from amorphous to crystal growth of boron films in plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition with B.sub.2 H.sub.6 +He,” J. Appl. Phys., 66, 466 (1989).
Komatsu, S., and Y. Moriyoshi, “Transition from thermal-to electron-impact decomposition of diborane in plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition of boron films from B.sub.2 H.sub.6 +He,” J. Appl. Phys. 66, 1180 (1989).
Lee, W., W. J. Lackey, and P. K. Agrawal, “Kinetic analysis of chemical vapor deposition of boron nitride,” J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 74, 2642 (1991).
Li, Jun et al., “Bottom-up approach for carbon nanotube interconnects,” Applied Physics Letters, Apr. 14, 2003, pp. 2491-2493, vol. 82 No. 15.
Lines, U.S. Appl. No. 12/352,864, filed Jan. 13, 2009.
Lines, U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,120, filed Mar. 17, 2010.
Ma. R.Z., et al., “Processing and properties of carbon nanotubes-nano-SIC ceramic”, Journal of Materials Science 1998, pp. 5243-5246, vol. 33.
Maya, L., and L. A. Harris, “Pyrolytic deposition of carbon films containing nitrogen and/or boron,” J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 73, 1912 (1990).
Michaelidis, M., and R. Pollard, “Analysis of chemical vapor deposition of boron,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 1757 (1985).
Micro X-ray Tube Operation Manual, X-ray and Specialty Instruments Inc., 1996, 5 pages.
Moore, A. W., S. L. Strong, and G. L. Doll, “Properties and characterization of codeposited boron nitride and carbon materials,” J. Appl. Phys. 65, 5109 (1989).
Nakamura, K., “Preparation and properties of amorphous boron nitride films by molecular flow chemical vapor deposition,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 1757 (1985).
Panayiotatos, et al., “Mechanical performance and growth characteristics of boron nitride films with respect to their optical, compositional properties and density,” Surface and Coatings Technology, 151-152 (2002) 155-159.
Peigney, et al., “Carbon nanotubes in novel ceramic matrix nanocomposites,” Ceramics International, 2000, pp. 677-683, vol. 26.
Perkins, F. K., R. A. Rosenberg, and L. Sunwoo, “Synchrotronradiation deposition of boron and boron carbide films from boranes and carboranes: decaborane,” J. Appl. Phys. 69,4103 (1991).
Powell et al., “Metalized polyimide filters for x-ray astronomy and other applications,” SPIE, pp. 432-440, vol. 3113.
Rankov. A. “A Novel Correlated Double Sampling Poly-Si Circuit for Readout System in Large Area X-Ray Sensors”, 2005.
Roca i Cabarrocas, P., S. Kumar, and B. Drevillon, “In situ study of the thermal decomposition of B.sub.2 H.sub.6 by combining spectroscopic ellipsometry and Kelvin probe measurements,” J. Appl. Phys. 66, 3286 (1989).
Satishkumar B.C., et al. “Synthesis of metal oxide nanorods using carbon nanotubes as templates,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2000, pp. 2115-2119, vol. 10.
Scholze et al., “Detection efficiency of energy-dispersive detectors with low-energy windows” X-Ray Spectrometry, X-Ray Spectrom, 2005: 34: 473-476.
Sheather, “The support of thin windows for x-ray proportional counters,” Journal Phys,E., Apr. 1973, pp. 319-322, vol. 6, No. 4.
Shirai, K., S.-I. Gonda, and S. Gonda, “Characterization of hydrogenated amorphous boron films prepared by electron cyclotron resonance plasma chemical vapor deposition method,” J. Appl. Phys. 67, 6286 (1990).
Tamura, et al “Developmenmt of ASICs for CdTe Pixel and Line Sensors”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 52, No. 5, Oct. 2005.
Tien-Hui Lin et al., “An investigation on the films used as teh windows of ultra-soft X-ray counters.” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 276-283, May 1978, abstract only.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,154, filed Dec. 17, 2009, Krzysztof Kozaczek.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,120, filed Mar. 17, 2010, Michael Lines.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/783,707, filed May 20, 2010, Steven D. Liddiard.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/899,750, filed Oct. 7, 2010, Steven Liddiard.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/018,667, filed Feb. 1, 2011, Lei Pei.
Vandenbulcke, L. G., “Theoretical and experimental studies on the chemical vapor deposition of boron carbide,” Indust. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 24, 568 (1985).
Viitanen Veli-Pekka et al., Comparison of Ultrathin X-Ray Window Designs, presented at the Soft X-rays in the 21st Century Conference held in Provo, Utah Feb. 10-13, 1993, pp. 182-190.
Wagner et al, “Effects of Scatter in Dual-Energy Imaging: An Alternative Analysis”; IEEE; Sep. 1989, vol. 8. No. 3.
Winter, J., H. G. Esser, and H. Reimer, “Diborane-free boronization,” Fusion Technol. 20, 225 (1991).
www.moxtek,com, Moxtek, Sealed Proportional Counter X-Ray Windows, Oct. 2007, 3 pages.
www.moxtek.com, Moxtek, AP3 Windows, Ultra-thin Polymer X-Ray Windows, Sep. 2006, 2 pages.
www.moxtek.com, Moxtek, DuraBeryllium X-Ray Windows, May. 2007, 2 pages.
www.moxtek.com, Moxtek, ProLine Series 10 Windows, Ultra-thin Polymer X-Ray Windows, Sep. 2006, 2 pages.
www.moxtek.com, X-Ray Windows, ProLINE Series 20 Windows Ultra-thin Polymer X-ray Windows, 2 pages. Applicant believes that this product was offered for sale prior to the filed of applicant's application.
Yan, Xing-Bin, et al., Fabrications of Three-Dimensional ZnO-Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Hybrids Using Self-Assembled CNT Micropatterns as Framework, 2007. pp. 17254-17259, vol. III.
Nakajima et al.; “Trial use of carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic as a non-Bragg window material of x-ray transmission”; Rev. Sci. Instrum 60 (7), Jul. 1989.
Coleman, et al.; “Small but strong: A review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube-polymer composites”; Carbon 44 (2006) 1624-1652.
Najafi, et al.; “Radiation resistant polymer-carbon nanotube nanocomposite thin films”; Department of Materials Science and Engineering . . . Nov. 21, 2004.
Wang, et al.; “Highly oriented carbon nanotube papers made of aligned carbon nanotubes”; Tsinghua-Foxconn Nanotechnology Research Center and Department of Physics; Published Jan. 31, 2008.
Xie, et al.; “Dispersion and alignment of carbon nanotubes in polymer matrix: A review”; Center for Advanced Materials Technology; Apr. 20, 2005.
Wu, et al.; “Mechanical properties and thermo-gravimetric analysis of PBO thin films”; Advanced Materials Laboratory, Institute of Electro-Optical Engineering; Apr. 30, 2006.
Coleman, et al.; “Mechanical Reinforcement of Polymers Using Carbon Nanotubes”; Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 689-706.
Zhang, et al.; “Superaligned Carbon Nanotube Grid for High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy of Nanomaterials”; 2008 American Chemical Society.
Hu, et al.; “Carbon Nanotube Thin Films: Fabrication, Properties, and Applications”; 2010 American Chemical Society Jul. 22, 2010.
NEYCO, “SEM & TEM: Grids”; catalog; http://www.neyco.fr/pdf/Grids.pdf#page=1.
Hexcel Corporation; “Prepreg Technology” brochure; http://www.hexcel.com/Reso2882urces/DataSheets/Brochure-Data-Sheets/Prepreg—Technology.pdf.
Chakrapani et al.; Capillarity-Driven Assembly of Two-Dimensional Cellular Carbon Nanotube Foams; PNAS; Mar. 23, 2004; pp. 4009-4012; vol. 101; No. 12.
Nakajima et al; Trial Use of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Plastic as a Non-Bragg Window Material of X-Ray Transmission; Rev. Sci. Instrum.; Jul. 1989; pp. 2432-2435; vol. 60, No. 7.
Vajtai ; Building Carbon Nanotubes and Their Smart Architecture; pp. 691-698; 2002.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/307,579, filed Nov. 30, 2011, Dongbing Wang.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,531, filed Dec. 6, 2011, Steven Liddiard.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/899,750, filed Oct. 7, 2010; Steven Liddiard; office action dated Oct. 15, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/018,667, filed Feb. 1, 2011; Robert C. Davis; office action dated Oct. 2, 2012.
PCT application EP12167551.6; filed May 10, 2012; Robert C. Davis; European search report mailed Nov. 21, 2013.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120213336 A1 Aug 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61445878 Feb 2011 US