Patent Application
20220411536
The present invention relates to a multispecific antibody comprising at least one domain specifically binding to a tumor-associated immune checkpoint antigen with low affinity, at least one domain specifically binding to a tumor-associated antigen (TAA), and optionally at least one domain specifically binding to an immune cell antigen. Additionally, the present invention relates to specific domains for use in said multispecific antibody, and pharmaceutical compositions and methods of use thereof. The present invention further relates to a nucleic acid encoding said multispecific antibody or specific domains thereof, a vector comprising said nucleic acid, a host cell comprising said nucleic acid or said vector, and a method of producing said multispecific antibody or specific domains thereof.
Cancer continues to pose a major unmet medical need, despite the considerable progress made in its treatment. Some of the most substantial progress made in cancer treatment in recent years has come with the advent of immunotherapies of various molecular classes, including, but not limited to: monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), bispecific antibodies (bsAbs), recombinant proteins, and chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T cell) therapies. Such therapies induce anti-tumor immunity by: a) actively directing immune-effector cells to tumor-resident cells and/or b) stimulating immune-effector cells and/or c) relieving tumor-mediated immune-suppression. These immunotherapies commonly exploit the overexpression—as compared to extratumoral loci—of specific antigens by tumor-resident cells (e.g., malignant cells, cells of the tumor vasculature, stromal cells, immune cells, etc.) to target their pharmacological activity to tumors. Among these antigens, tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) comprise cell-surface proteins selectively overexpressed by malignant cells. By binding to TAAs with high affinity, immunotherapies can, to a degree, restrict their immunomodulatory activity to immunological synapses between tumor cells and immune effector cells.
A common class of TAA-binding immunotherapies are mAbs that elicit anti-tumor immunity by opsonizing tumor-cells and triggering antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) by Fcγ receptor (FcγR)-expressing cells, primarily natural killer (NK) cells. Other TAA-binding immunotherapies leverage cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) to induce targeted depletion of malignant cells, such as CAR-T cells as well as bsAbs that simultaneously engage the T cell antigen, CD3 (TAA/CD3 bsAbs). While the therapeutic utility of TAA-(re)directed CTLs has been clinically validated, such utility can be limited in instances when tumor-mediated immune-suppression impairs the activation/stimulation of CTLs. Even in tumors where tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are abundant (i.e., “inflamed” or “hot” tumors), tumor immune-evasion can be induced by a variety of means, such as through the expression of immune-checkpoint ligands/receptors (e.g., PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4) as well as the recruitment of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs).
Immune checkpoints are regulators of the immune system and are involved in processes such as self-tolerance or immune suppression in cancer.
PD-L1 (CD274, B7-H1) is a 40 kDa type I transmembrane protein. PD-L1 is a surface glycoprotein ligand for PD-1, a key immune checkpoint receptor expressed by activated T and B cells and mediates immunosuppression. PD-L1 is implicated in the suppression of immune system responses during chronic infections, pregnancy, tissue allografts, autoimmune diseases, and cancer. PD-L1 is found on both antigen-presenting cells and human cancer cells, such as squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, melanoma, and brain tumor, thyroid, thymus, esophagus, lung, breast, gastrointestinal tract, colorectum, liver, pancreas, kidney, adrenal cortex, bladder, urothelium, ovary, and skin (Katsuya Y, et al., Lung Cancer. 88(2):154-159 (2015); Nakanishi J, et al., Cancer Immunol Immunother. 56(8):1173-1182 (2007); Nomi T, et al., Clin Cancer Res. 13(7):2151-2157 (2007); Fay A P, et al., J Immunother Cancer. 3:3 (2015); Strome S E, et al., Cancer Res. 63(19):6501-6505 (2003); Jacobs J F, et al. Neuro Oncol. 11(4):394-402 (2009); Wilmotte R, et al. Neuroreport. 16(10):1081-1085 (2005)). PD-L1 is rarely expressed on normal tissues but inducibly expressed on tumor site (Dong H, et al., Nat Med. 8(8):793-800 (2002); Wang et al., Onco Targets Ther. 9: 5023-5039 (2016)). PD-L1 downregulates T cell activation and cytokine secretion by binding to PD-1 (Freeman et al., 2000; Latchman et al, 2001). PD-1, activated by PD-L1, potentially provides an immune-tolerant environment for tumor development and growth. PD-L1 also negatively regulates T-cell function through interaction with another receptor, B7.1 (B7-1, CD80).
Inhibition of the PD-L1/PD-1 interaction allows for potent anti-tumor activity. A number of antibodies that disrupt the PD-1 signaling have entered clinical development. These antibodies belong to the following two main categories: those that target PD-1 (nivolumab, Bristol-Myers Squibb; pembrolizumab, Merck, Whitehouse Station, N.J.; pidilizumab, CureTech, Yavne, Israel) and those that target PD-L1 (MPDL3280A, Genentech, South San Francisco, Calif.; MED14736, Medimmune/AstraZeneca; BMS-936559, Bristol-Myers Squibb; MSB0010718C, EMD Serono, Rockland, Mass.) (for review see Postow M A et al., J Clin Oncol. June 10; 33(17):1974-82 (2015)). Targeting PD-L1 versus targeting PD-1 may result in different biologic effects. PD-1 antibodies prevent interaction of PD-1 with both its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. PD-L1 antibodies do not prevent PD-1 from interacting with PDL2, although the effect of this interaction remains unknown. PD-L1 antibodies however prevent interaction of PD-L1 with not only PD-1, but also B7-1 (Butte M J, et al., Immunity 27:111-122, (2007)), which is believed to exert negative signals on T cells. Blocking PD-L1 has demonstrated promising early data, and currently, four clinical anti-PD-L1 mAbs are in the testing: atezolizumab and MED14736 (both are Fc null variants of human IgG1), MSB001078C (IgG1), and BMS-936559 (IgG4) (Chester C., et al., Cancer Immunol Immunother October; 65(10):1243-8 (2016)).
New and emerging treatments frequently combine TAA-targeting immunotherapies with one or more additional immunotherapies that target immune-checkpoint pathways in an effort to further relieve, or overcome, tumor-mediated immune-suppression. Monoclonal antibodies that block immune-suppressive antigens, such as CTLA-4 (e.g., ipiliumumab), PD-1 (e.g., nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and PD-L1 (e.g., avelumab, atezolizumab), have elicited impressive response rates in patients exhibiting a variety of tumor histologies. Initial results of combined treatment with immune-checkpoint modulators and TAA-binding immunotherapies have been encouraging. As an example, the HER2-targeting mAb, trastuzumab (Herceptin®, Genentech), is currently being clinically evaluated (phase II) in combination with nivolumab (Opdivo®, Bristol-Myers Squibb) as well as in combination with both nivolumab and ipilimumab (Yervoy®, Bristol-Myers Squibb), National Clinical Trial (NCT) 03409848. Similarly, the CD19/CD3 bsAb, blinatumomab (Blincyto®, Amgen), is currently being clinically evaluated (phase I/II) in combination with pembrolizumab (Keytruda®, Merck) as well as in a phase I trial as part of a triple immunotherapy combination with both nivolumab and ipilimumab, NCT03512405 and NCT02879695, respectively.
Additionally, combinations of targeting immune checkpoints and T-cell co-stimulatory receptors have been evaluated. The combination of anti-PD-L1 and anti-CD137 antibodies increased overall survival and enhanced T-cell effector function in the ID-8 ovarian adenocarcinoma model (Duraiswamy J, et al., Cancer Res 73:6900-6912 (2013)). The combination of urelumab (anti-CD137) with nivolumab (anti-PD-1) in both solid tumors and B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is being tested in a phase I/II trial (NCT02253992), while PF-05082566 (anti-CD137) is being tested in a phase I trial with pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in patients with solid tumors (NCT02179918) (Chester C., et al., Cancer Immunol Immunother October; 65(10):1243-8 (2016)).
Recently, the effect of multivalent and multispecific fusion polypeptides that bind PD-L1 and CD137 has been evaluated in vitro on T-cell activation and proliferation. Using an autologous in vitro co-culture system implementing immature DC and donor matched T-cells, it has been demonstrated that INBRX-105, a multispecific and multivalent polypeptide having two PD-L1 binding domains, two CD137 binding domains and an Fc region, is superior in stimulating interferon-gamma production, when compared to the monospecific PD-L1 sd-Ab-Fc fusion protein, the CD137 sdAb-Fc fusion protein, the combination of the two, the anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab, the anti-CD137 antibody utomilumab (PF-05082566), or the anti-PD-L1 antibody prembrolizumab, and combinations thereof, at inducing IFNγ or mediating CD8+ T-cell proliferation and activation (WO 2017/123650). Additionally, WO 2016/149201 discloses certain antibodies directed against PD-L1 and suggests creating bispecific antibody constructs further comprising a T-cell engaging antibody, with CD137 being contained in a non-exclusive list of more than 20 potential T-cell targets.
While immunotherapy combinations have demonstrated their potential to enhance anti-tumor responses through additive or synergistic activity, they are beset with two consistent limitations: 1) clinical development challenges due to the complexity of adjusting the doses of multiple component therapies across various patient cohorts, and 2) reliance on two or more separate manufacturing processes for component therapies, with the attendant implication of high cost of goods sold (COGS) and treatment-pricing. These limitations are even more severe when the number of immunotherapies included in combination regimens increases. Additionally, even for treatment regimens that include only a single immunotherapy, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) often preclude administration at maximally effective doses (MEDs) or lead to discontinuation of treatment, resulting in limited efficacy. Unfortunately, similar to their anti-tumor activity, the drug-related toxicities elicited by each component immunotherapy in combination regimens also tend to be additive or synergistic.
Thus, despite the promising opportunities offered by inhibiting the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1, the applications described above have often resulted in toxicities caused by binding of anti-PD-L1 antibodies to PD-L1 expressed on non-target cells (for a review, see Wang et al., Cancer J. 24 (2018) 36-40).
The exact pathways by which such DLTs arise can vary, but the risk of immunotherapy-related toxicities can typically be minimized, or eliminated, by enhancing the tumor-localization of pharmacological activity. Extratumoral activity of immunotherapies results in the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines in healthy tissues, which can result in undesirable safety profiles. Leveraging T cell-engaging bsAbs that require binding to a TAA to elicit immunomodulatory activity is a promising strategy to restrict such cytokine release to cytolytic/immunological synapses between tumor-resident cells and T cells. However, conventional TAA/CD3 bsAbs are also commonly associated with toxicities, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), putatively due to excessive activity of anti-CD3 domains. Additionally, while TAA/CD3 bsAbs potently deplete TAA-overexpressing cells, they do so by recruiting and stimulating CTLs whether or not such cells express a T cell receptor (TCR) that recognizes a tumor-antigen(s) (i.e., tumor-reactive T cell). Therefore, rather than stimulating, or reactivating, the host's native anti-tumor immunity, TAA/CD3 bsAbs somewhat indiscriminately stimulate CTLs, potentially posing safety risks and leading to insufficient anti-cancer immune-memory formation.
In addition to CD3, T cell co-stimulatory receptors (e.g., 4-1BB, OX40, ICOS, GITR) are currently being clinically evaluated as targets for therapeutic stimulation of T cells in cancer. One putative advantage of anti-tumor T cell stimulation via such targets is that they are transiently expressed upon TCR signaling. As such, their expression tends to be selectively heightened in inflamed TMEs, particularly on tumor-reactive T cells, whose TCRs are receiving consistent stimulation by dint of abundant interactions with major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) expressed by malignant cells and antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Therefore, targeting costimulatory receptors with, e.g., mAbs and bsAbs, should more selectively stimulate, and expand, pre-existing anti-tumor T cells than CD3-targeting approaches, potentially rendering such biologics safer and their effects more durable.
Among costimulatory receptors, 4-1 BB (CD137, TNF-receptor superfamily 9, TNFRSF9) has emerged as especially promising due to its expression profile and its role as a multipotent mediator of anti-tumor immunity (Bartkowiak and Curran 2015; Yonezawa et al. 2015). 4-1 BB is an inducible T cell costimulatory receptor. Its expression is activation-dependent and encompasses a broad subset of immune cells, including activated CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, NK and NKT cells, Tregs, dendritic cells (DC) including follicular DC, stimulated mast cells, differentiating myeloid cells, monocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils (Wang et al, Immunol Rev. 229(1): 192-215 (2009)), and activated B cells (Zhang et al, J Immunol. 184(2):787-795 (2010)). In addition, 4-1 BB expression has also been demonstrated on tumor vasculature (Broil K et al., Am J Clin Pathol. 115(4):543-549 (2001); Seaman et al, Cancer Cell 11(6):539-554 (2007)) and atherosclerotic endothelium (Olofsson et al, Circulation 117(10): 1292 1301 (2008)).
4-1 BB costimulates T cells to carry out effector functions such as eradication of established tumors, broadening primary CD8+ T cell responses, and enhancing the memory pool of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. In vivo efficacy studies in mice have revealed that 4-1 BB-agonistic mAbs, administered as both a monotherapy and as a component of combination regimens, leads to anti-tumor protective T cell memory responses and tumor regression in multiple tumor models. Additionally, two 4-1 BB-agonistic mAbs are currently in the clinic: urelumab (Bristol-Myers Squibb), a fully humanized IgG4 mAb, and utomilumab (PF-05082566, Pfizer), a fully human IgG2 mAb (Chester C., et al., Cancer Immunol Immunother October; 65(10):1243-8 (2016)). Although utilization of 4-1BB-agonistic mAbs is a very promising treatment strategy, clinical data collected thus far suggest that an mAb-based approach to 4-1BB stimulation results in a trade-off between efficacy and safety. Namely, highly active 4-1 BB-agonistic mAbs elicit DLTs that attenuate treatment efficacy, whereas weakly active 4-1 BB-agonistic mAbs are well tolerated but do not seem to be highly efficacious, including at their predicted MED.
Highly active 4-1BB-agonistic mAbs lead to alterations in the immune system and organ function, increasing risks of toxicities. High doses of such mAbs in naïve and tumor-bearing mice have been reported to induce T cell-infiltration to the liver and elevations of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, consistent with liver inflammation (Niu L, et al. J Immunol 178(7):4194-4213 (2007); Dubrot J, et al., Int J Cancer 128(1):105-118 (2011)). Initial clinical studies into the human therapeutic use of 4-1 BB-agonistic mAbs have also demonstrated elevations of liver enzymes and increased incidence of hepatitis (Sznol M., et al., J Clin Oncol 26(115S):3007 (2008); Ascierto P A, et al., Semin Oncol 37(5):508-516 (2010); Chester C., et al., Cancer Immunol Immunother October; 65(10):1243-8 (2016)). Potentially fatal hepatitis was observed in a Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) phase II anti-CD137 study for previously treated stage III/IV melanoma, National Clinical Trial (NCT) 00612664. This study and several others (NCT00803374, NCT00309023, NCT00461110, NCT00351325) were terminated due to adverse events (Chester C., et al., Cancer Immunol Immunother October; 65(10):1243-8 (2016)). Such adverse events are most probably due to systemic overstimulation of T cells.
Similar to TAA/CD3 bsAbs, TAA/4-1 BB bsAbs are designed to selectively agonize 4-1 BB in the context of immunological synapses between tumor-resident cells and immune-effector cells, thereby preventing the toxicities associated with extratumoral T cell stimulation. As an example, the 5T4/4-1 BB bsAb (APV-527) being co-developed by Aptevo Therapeutics and Alligator Biosciences (WO2017182672 A1) is designed to elicit targeted costimulation of T cells by anchoring to 5T4, a TAA expressed by a variety of solid tumors. APV-527 pre-clinical data suggest that conditionally stimulating 4-1 BB in the presence of 5T4 effectively tumor-localizes T cell costimulation, leads to considerable enhancement of T cell activation in the TME and inhibits tumor growth in 5T4+ tumor models. This same tumor-localizing strategy can conceivably leverage a variety of clinically validated TAAs, for which therapeutic targeting has been demonstrated to be both efficacious and safe.
HER2 has been established as a TAA that can be targeted effectively and safely to address HER2+ cancers. The most notable HER2-targeted therapies approved for use in patients with HER2+ tumors are the mAbs, trastuzumab (Herceptin®, Genentech) and pertuzumab (Perjeta®, Genentech). While trastuzumab and pertuzumab are similar insofar as they act, in part, by opsonizing HER2+ cells and triggering ADCC, the two antibodies are dissimilar in the means by which they prevent pro-proliferative HER2-signaling. In the case of trastuzumab, binding to its epitope prevents HER2 homodimerization and thereby inhibits HER2-signaling. However, in a subset of patients, compensatory HER3 overexpression, and the formation of HER2/HER3 heterodimers, leads to heightened signaling, rendering such patients refractory to treatment with trastuzumab. By contrast, pertuzumab binds to an epitope that prevents HER2/HER3 heterodimerization, likewise inhibiting pro-proliferative signaling. Due to this mechanism of action (MoA) complementarity, pertuzumab and trastuzumab are synergistic, and their combination has been approved for the treatment of HER2+ breast cancer.
While combined inhibition of HER2-signaling and ADCC-mediated depletion of HER2+ cells has been effective for many patients, many other patients exhibit a HER2+ tumor phenotype that very weakly responds to treatment with conventional antibodies. In some cases, this is because the particular HER2+ tumor does not rely on HER2-signaling for proliferation, rendering the primary MoA of trastuzumab/pertuzumab ineffective. This has engendered the hypothesis that a targeted cytotoxic approach that is more potent than ADCC could be of considerable benefit. Validation of this concept has somewhat emerged with the market approval of the ADC trastuzumab-emtansine (Kadcyla®, Genentech). In that same vein, multiple companies are currently developing HER2/CD3 bsAbs to stimulate redirected T cells to induce potent, targeted cytotoxicity. Additionally, in several patients exhibiting primary or secondary non-responsiveness to HER2-targeting mAbs, the HER2+ tumor phenotype includes heightened expression of ligands/receptors (e.g., PD-L1) that actively suppress anti-tumor immune-responses. Predictably, this has led to the combination of HER2-targeting mAbs with immune-checkpoint-modulating mAbs, which have achieved some success in clinical settings. TAAs that are almost exclusively expressed on cancer cells, such as oncofetal tumor antigens, are referred to as clean TAAs. TAA that are also expressed on normal, non-cancer cells—typically at lower level compared to cancer cells—are non-clean TAAs. Due to the very high potency of TAA/CD3 bsAbs approaches, non-clean TAAs are a challenge as they lead to the depletion of non-tumor cells also expressing the TAA. A well-known example of a non-clean TAA is HER2, which is not only expressed on tumor cells but—at a lower level—also in various other tissues. Therefore, novel therapies that improve the selectivity of TAA/CD3 bsAbs approaches for tumor tissues are needed.
There is precedent, as well, for the use of HER2 as a target to tumor-localize 4-1 BB stimulation by a bispecific molecule. Pieris Pharmaceuticals has initiated clinical trials to evaluate a HER2/4-1 BB bispecific fusion protein (PRS-343) (NCT03330561). PRS-343 comprises an IgG4 variant of trastuzumab fused to a bivalent 4-1 BB-binding anticalin. Preclinical and clinical evidence supporting: 1) the potential benefits of PD-(L)1 blockade and 4-1 BB stimulation, 2) the benefits of combining HER2-targeting immunotherapies with PD-(L)1-blocking immunotherapies, and 3) the synergy of trastuzumab and pertuzumab, suggests a potential benefit to combining such a HER2/4-1 BB bispecific molecule with as many as two additional immunotherapies in a single treatment. In fact, PRS-343 is also currently being clinically evaluated in combination with the PD-L1-blocking mAb, atezolizumab (Tecentriq®, Genentech) (NCT03650348).
As mentioned previously, an inevitable drawback of combination therapies, particularly as the number of component therapies increases, is that their clinical development can be burdensomely complex and therefore expensive. The requirement to develop multiple manufacturing processes adds further up the development cost and multiplies COGS. The inclusion of more than two specificities in a single molecule (e.g., tri- or tetra-specific antibodies) could theoretically address many of the foregoing limitations with respect to safety, efficacy and cost. Tri-/tetra-specific molecules that are TAA-targeted are theoretically capable of eliciting highly tumor-localized, and synergistic, anti-tumor modulation of multiple immune-checkpoint pathways, which could provide safer and more effective therapies for a variety of cancers. Additionally, such molecules would further limit the need for co-administration of additional immunotherapies to boost patient responses, supporting ease-of-development and minimizing treatment costs. However, implementation of tri-/tetra-specific antibodies for therapeutic use has been complicated due to issues with their molecular architecture, the properties of their component antigen-binding domains and/or poor biophysical properties. Therefore, there remains a clear need for novel tri-/tetra-specific antibodies that elicit tumor-localized, synergistic immunomodulation and that have biophysical properties rendering them suitable for pharmaceutical development.
In addition, despite the fact that numerous antibodies already exist that are specific for tumor-associated immune checkpoint antigens, TAAs and/or T cell co-stimulatory receptor, the complex and specific requirements of such tri- or tetraspecific antibodies require the development of novel antibody domains with tailor-made properties.
Thus, in spite of numerous treatment options for patients suffering from cancer, there remains a need for effective and safe therapeutic agents and a need for their preferential use in a more targeted manner. Immune-modulating biologics offer promising approaches in treatment of cancers due to their modes of actions, however global immunostimulation and lack of any restriction of this immunomodulation to pathologically relevant cells and sites causes numerous side effects and significant toxicities, which potentially may lead to increased morbidity and mortality of patients. It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a medicament to improve treatment of a proliferative disease, particularly a cancer.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a medicament to improve treatment of a proliferative disease, particularly a cancer. The present invention addresses the need for precision therapeutics for immuno-oncology that target only the disease-related cells.
In one aspect, the present invention relates to a multispecific antibody comprising at least a first domain specifically binding to a tumor-associated immune checkpoint antigen with low affinity, and at least a second domain specifically binding to a tumor-associated antigen (TAA).
The present invention further relates to a multispecific antibody comprising at least a first domain specifically binding to a tumor-associated immune checkpoint antigen with low affinity, at least a second domain specifically binding to a tumor-associated antigen (TAA), and at least a third domain specifically binding to an immune cell antigen, in particular wherein said immune cell antigen is present on T cell or NK cell.
More specifically, the present invention relates to a multispecific antibody wherein said first domain specifically binding to PD-L1 comprises a VH sequence of SEQ ID NO: 11 and a VL sequence of SEQ ID NO: 16.
The present invention further relates to a combination comprising (i) the multispecific antibody of the present invention and (ii) a second compound selected from (iia) an antibody directed at a TAA, in particular an antibody directed at HER2, in particular wherein the antibody is trastuzumab, (iib) a modulator of an immune checkpoint antigen, in particular wherein said immune checkpoint antigen is not a tumor-associated immune checkpoint antigen, and/or in particular wherein said immune checkpoint antigen is present on T cell or NK cell, and (iic) a modulator of angiogenesis.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to a pharmaceutical composition comprising the multispecific antibody of the invention and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides the multispecific antibody of the invention or the pharmaceutical composition of the invention for use as a medicament.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides the multispecific antibody of the invention or the pharmaceutical composition of the invention for use in treatment of cancer in a subject in need thereof.
In one aspect, the present invention provides use of the multispecific antibody of the invention or the pharmaceutical composition of the invention for treating cancer in a subject in need thereof.
In one aspect, the present invention provides use of the multispecific antibody of the invention or the pharmaceutical composition of the invention in the manufacture of a medicament for treatment of a cancer, in a subject in need thereof.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method of treating a cancer in a subject in need thereof comprising administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of the multispecific antibody of the invention or the pharmaceutical composition of the invention.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding the multispecific antibody of the invention. In a further aspect, the present invention provides a vector comprising said nucleic acid. In a further aspect, the present invention provides a host cell comprising said nucleic or said vector.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method of producing the multispecific antibody of the invention or a binding domain thereof or a fragment thereof, the method comprising the step of culturing a host cell comprising a nucleic acid or a vector encoding the multispecific antibody of the invention or a binding domain thereof or a fragment thereof.
The aspects, advantageous features and preferred embodiments of the present invention summarized in the following items, respectively alone or in combination, further contribute to solving the object of the invention:
Even though utilization of therapeutic antibodies inhibiting interaction of a tumor-associated immune checkpoint antigen, such as PD-L1, which its cognate ligand, such as PD-1, is a very promising treatment strategy, it is coupled to such difficulties as high toxicities and adverse events. There is thus a need in the medical field for novel approaches of inhibiting the interaction of a tumor-associated immune checkpoint antigen which its cognate ligand, which have lower rate of dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events than the currently available approaches.
The present invention provides a multispecific antibody comprising: at least a first domain specifically binding to a tumor-associated immune checkpoint antigen with low affinity, and at least a second domain specifically binding to a tumor-associated antigen (TAA)). The multispecific antibody of the present disclosure are capable of binding to a target cell displaying said TAA by virtue of said first domain specifically binding to said TAA, and of simultaneous binding of said low affinity binding domain, due to avidity effects, to said tumor-associated immune checkpoint antigen present on the same target cell, so that interaction of said tumor-associated immune checkpoint antigen is inhibited. Due to the low affinity of said first domain, specific binding to non-target cells displaying only said tumor-associated immune checkpoint antigen, but not said TAA, is not occurring to any relevant extent. Thus, the multispecific antibody of the present invention due to its ability to mediate, e.g. agonize, potent signaling of said tumor-associated immune checkpoint antigen on said target cells without interacting with non-target cells, so that the treatment with the multispecific antibody of the present invention does not lead to depletion of cells not expressing the TAA.
In addition, it has been surprisingly found that, the multispecific antibody of the present disclosure comprising (a) at least said first domain, (b) at least said second domain, and (c) at least a third domain specifically binding to an immune cell antigen demonstrated further beneficial properties as shown in the Examples and accompanying figures. Furthermore, the optional addition of a half-life-extending anti-HSA domain not only enables convenient dosing, but also should promote delivery of the molecule to tumor microenvironments.
The multispecific antibodies of the present invention thus provide distinct therapeutic advantages over conventional compositions and therapies.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains.
The terms “comprising” and “including” are used herein in their open-ended and non-limiting sense unless otherwise noted. With respect to such latter embodiments, the term “comprising” thus includes the narrower term “consisting of”.
The terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar references in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. For example, the term “a cell” includes a plurality of cells, including mixtures thereof. Where the plural form is used for compounds, salts, and the like, this is taken to mean also a single compound, salt, or the like.
In one aspect, the present invention relates to a multispecific antibody comprising at least a first domain specifically binding to a tumor-associated immune checkpoint antigen with low affinity, and at least a second domain specifically binding to a tumor-associated antigen (TAA).
The term “antibody” and the like, as used herein, includes whole antibodies or single chains thereof; and any antigen-binding fragment (i.e., “antigen-binding portion”) or single chains thereof; and molecules comprising antibody CDRs, VH regions or VL regions (including without limitation multispecific antibodies). A naturally occurring “whole antibody” is a glycoprotein comprising at least two heavy (H) chains and two light (L) chains inter-connected by disulfide bonds. Each heavy chain is comprised of a heavy chain variable region (abbreviated herein as VH) and a heavy chain constant region. The heavy chain constant region is comprised of three domains, CH1, CH2 and CH3. Each light chain is comprised of a light chain variable region (abbreviated herein as VL) and a light chain constant region. The light chain constant region is comprised of one domain, CL. The VH and VL regions can be further subdivided into regions of hypervariability, termed complementarity determining regions (CDR), interspersed with regions that are more conserved, termed framework regions (FR). Each VH and VL is composed of three CDRs and four FRs arranged from amino-terminus to carboxy-terminus in the following order: FR1, CDR1, FR2, CDR2, FR3, CDR3, FR4. The variable regions of the heavy and light chains contain a binding domain that interacts with an antigen. The constant regions of the antibodies may mediate the binding of the immunoglobulin to host tissues or factors, including various cells of the immune system (e.g., effector cells) and the first component (Clq) of the classical complement system.
The terms “binding domain”, “antigen-binding fragment thereof”, “antigen binding portion” of an antibody, and the like, as used herein, refer to one or more fragments of an intact antibody that retain the ability to specifically bind to a given antigen (e.g., CD137, PD-L1, HSA). Antigen binding functions of an antibody can be performed by fragments of an intact antibody. In some embodiments, a binding domain of a multispecific antibody of the present invention is selected from the group consisting of a Fab fragment, a monovalent fragment consisting of the VL, VH, CL and CH1 domains; a F (ab)2 fragment, a bivalent fragment comprising two Fab fragments linked by a disulfide bridge at the hinge region; an Fd fragment consisting of the VH and CH1 domains; an Fv fragment consisting of the VL and VH domains of a single arm of an antibody; a single domain antibody (dAb) fragment (Ward et al., 1989 Nature 341:544-546), which consists of a VH domain; an isolated complementarity determining region (CDR), dsFv, a scAb, STAB, a single domain antibody (sdAb or dAb), a single domain heavy chain antibody, and a single domain light chain antibody, a VHH, a VNAR, single domain antibodies based on the VNAR structure from shark, and binding domains based on alternative scaffolds including but limited to ankyrin-based domains, fynomers, avimers, anticalins, fibronectins, and binding sites being built into constant regions of antibodies (e.g. f-star technology (F-star's Modular Antibody Technology™)). Suitably, a binding domain of the present invention is a single-chain Fv fragment (scFv) or single antibody variable domains. In a preferred embodiment, a binding domain of the present invention is a single-chain Fv fragment (scFv).
The term “Complementarity Determining Regions” (“CDRs”) are amino acid sequences with boundaries determined using any of a number of well-known schemes, including those described by Kabat et al. (1991), “Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest,” 5th Ed. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. (“Kabat” numbering scheme), Al-Lazikani et al., (1997) JMB 273, 927-948 (“Chothia” numbering scheme), ImMunoGenTics (IMGT) numbering (Lefranc, M.-P., The Immunologist, 7, 132-136 (1999); Lefranc, M.-P. et al., Dev. Comp. Immunol., 27, 55-77 (2003) (“IMGT” numbering scheme) and numbering scheme described in Honegger & Pluckthun, J. Mol. Biol. 309 (2001) 657-670 (“AHo” numbering). For example, for classic formats, under Kabat, the CDR amino acid residues in the heavy chain variable domain (VH) are numbered 31-35 (HCDR1), 50-65 (HCDR2), and 95-102 (HCDR3); and the CDR amino acid residues in the light chain variable domain (VL) are numbered 24-34 (LCDR1), 50-56 (LCDR2), and 89-97 (LCDR3). Under Chothia the CDR amino acids in the VH are numbered 26-32 (HCDR1), 52-56 (HCDR2), and 95-102 (HCDR3); and the amino acid residues in VL are numbered 24-34 (LCDR1), 50-56 (LCDR2), and 89-97 (LCDR3). By combining the CDR definitions of both Kabat and Chothia, the CDRs consist of amino acid residues 26-35 (HCDR1), 50-65 (HCDR2), and 95-102 (HCDR3) in human VH and amino acid residues 24-34 (LCDR1), 50-56 (LCDR2), and 89-97 (LCDR3) in human VL. Under IMGT the CDR amino acid residues in the VH are numbered approximately 26-35 (HCDR1), 51-57 (HCDR2) and 93-102 (HCDR3), and the CDR amino acid residues in the VL are numbered approximately 27-32 (LCDR1), 50-52 (LCDR2), and 89-97 (LCDR3) (numbering according to “Kabat”). Under IMGT, the CDRs of an antibody can be determined using the program IMGT/DomainGap Align.
In the context of the present invention, the numbering system suggested by Honegger & Pluckthun (“AHo) is used (Honegger & Pluckthun, J. Mol. Biol. 309 (2001) 657-670), unless specifically mentioned otherwise. Furthermore, the following residues are defined as CDRs according to AHo numbering scheme: LCDR1 (also referred to as CDR-L1): L24-L42; LCDR2 (also referred to as CDR-L2): L58-L72; LCDR3 (also referred to as CDR-L3): L107-L138; HCDR1 (also referred to as CDR-H1): H27-H42; HCDR2 (also referred to as CDR-H2): H57-H76; HCDR3 (also referred to as CDR-H3): H108-H138. For the sake of clarity, the numbering system according to Honegger & Pluckthun takes the length diversity into account that is found in naturally occurring antibodies, both in the different VH and VL subfamilies and, in particular, in the CDRs, and provides for gaps in the sequences. Thus, in a given antibody variable domain usually not all positions 1 to 149 will be occupied by an amino acid residue.
The term “binding specificity” as used herein refers to the ability of an individual antibody to react with one antigenic determinant and not with a different antigenic determinant. As use herein, the term “specifically binds to” or is “specific for” refers to measurable and reproducible interactions such as binding between a target and an antibody, which is determinative of the presence of the target in the presence of a heterogeneous population of molecules including biological molecules. For example, an antibody that specifically binds to a target (which can be an epitope) is an antibody that binds this target with greater affinity, avidity, more readily, and/or with greater duration than it binds to other targets. In its most general form (and when no defined reference is mentioned), “specific binding” is referring to the ability of the antibody to discriminate between the target of interest and an unrelated molecule, as determined, for example, in accordance with a specificity assay methods known in the art. Such methods comprise, but are not limited to Western blots, ELISA, RIA, ECL, IRMA, SPR (Surface plasmon resonance) tests and peptide scans. For example, a standard ELISA assay can be carried out. The scoring may be carried out by standard colour development (e.g. secondary antibody with horseradish peroxide and tetramethyl benzidine with hydrogen peroxide). The reaction in certain wells is scored by the optical density, for example, at 450 nm. Typical background (=negative reaction) may be about 0.1 OD; typical positive reaction may be about 1 OD. This means the ratio between a positive and a negative score can be 10-fold or higher. In a further example, an SPR assay can be carried out, wherein at least 10-fold, preferably at least 100-fold difference between a background and signal indicates on specific binding. Typically, determination of binding specificity is performed by using not a single reference molecule, but a set of about three to five unrelated molecules, such as milk powder, transferrin or the like.
Suitably, the antibody of the invention is an isolated antibody. The term “isolated antibody”, as used herein, refers to an antibody that is substantially free of other antibodies having different antigenic specificities (e.g., an isolated antibody that specifically binds PD-L1 and HER2 is substantially free of antibodies that specifically bind antigens other than PD-L1 and HER2, e.g., an isolated antibody that specifically binds PD-L1, HER2 and human serum albumin is substantially free of antibodies that specifically bind antigens other than PD-L1, HER2 and human serum albumin). Moreover, an isolated antibody may be substantially free of other cellular material and/or chemicals.
Suitably, the antibody of the invention is a monoclonal antibody. The term “monoclonal antibody” or “monoclonal antibody composition” as used herein refers to antibodies that are substantially identical to amino acid sequence or are derived from the same genetic source. A monoclonal antibody composition displays a binding specificity and affinity for a particular epitope, or binding specificities and affinities for specific epitopes.
Antibodies of the invention include, but are not limited to, the chimeric, human and humanized.
The term “chimeric antibody” (or antigen-binding fragment thereof) is an antibody molecule (or antigen-binding fragment thereof) in which (a) the constant region, or a portion thereof, is altered, replaced or exchanged so that the antigen binding site (variable region) is linked to a constant region of a different or altered class, effector function and/or species, or an entirely different molecule which confers new properties to the chimeric antibody, e.g., an enzyme, toxin, hormone, growth factor, drug, etc.; or (b) the variable region, or a portion thereof, is altered, replaced or exchanged with a variable region having a different or altered antigen specificity. For example, a mouse antibody can be modified by replacing its constant region with the constant region from a human immunoglobulin. Due to the replacement with a human constant region, the chimeric antibody can retain its specificity in recognizing the antigen while having reduced antigenicity in human as compared to the original mouse antibody.
The term “human antibody” (or antigen-binding fragment thereof), as used herein, is intended to include antibodies (and antigen-binding fragments thereof) having variable regions in which both the framework and CDR regions are derived from sequences of human origin. Furthermore, if the antibody contains a constant region, the constant region also is derived from such human sequences, e.g., human germline sequences, or mutated versions of human germline sequences. The human antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof of the invention may include amino acid residues not encoded by human sequences (e.g., mutations introduced by random or site-specific mutagenesis in vitro or by somatic mutation in vivo). This definition of a human antibody specifically excludes a humanized antibody comprising non-human antigen-binding residues. Human antibodies can be produced using various techniques known in the art, including phage-display libraries (Hoogenboom and Winter, J. Mol. Biol, 227:381 (1991); Marks et al, J. Mol. Biol, 222:581 (1991)). Also available for the preparation of human monoclonal antibodies are methods described in Cole et al, Monoclonal Antibodies and Cancer Therapy, Alan R. Liss, p. 77 (1985); Boemer et al, J. Immunol, 147(I):86-95 (1991). See also van Dijk and van de Winkel, Curr. Opin. Pharmacol, 5: 368-74 (2001). Human antibodies can be prepared by administering the antigen to a transgenic animal that has been modified to produce such antibodies in response to antigenic challenge, but whose endogenous loci have been disabled, e.g., immunized xenomice (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,075,181 and 6,150,584 regarding XENOMOUSE™ technology). See also, for example, Li et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103:3557-3562 (2006) regarding human antibodies generated via a human B-cell hybridoma technology.
A “humanized” antibody (or antigen-binding fragment thereof), as used herein, is an antibody (or antigen-binding fragment thereof) that retains the reactivity of a non-human antibody while being less immunogenic in humans. This can be achieved, for instance, by retaining the non-human CDR regions and replacing the remaining parts of the antibody with their human counterparts (i.e., the constant region as well as the framework portions of the variable region). Additional framework region modifications may be made within the human framework sequences as well as within the CDR sequences derived from the germline of another mammalian species. The humanized antibodies of the invention may include amino acid residues not encoded by human sequences (e.g., mutations introduced by random or site-specific mutagenesis in vitro or by somatic mutation in vivo, or a conservative substitution to promote stability or manufacturing). See, e.g., Morrison et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 81:6851-6855, 1984; Morrison and Oi, Adv. Immunol., 44:65-92, 1988; Verhoeyen et al., Science, 239: 1534-1536, 1988; Padlan, Molec. Immun., 28:489-498, 1991; and Padlan, Molec. Immun., 31: 169-217, 1994. Other examples of human engineering technology include, but are not limited to, Xoma technology disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,766,886.
The term “recombinant humanized antibody” as used herein, includes all human antibodies that are prepared, expressed, created or isolated by recombinant means, such as antibodies isolated from a host cell transformed to express the humanized antibody, e.g., from a transfectoma, and antibodies prepared, expressed, created or isolated by any other means that involve splicing of all or a portion of a human immunoglobulin gene, sequences to other DNA sequences.
Suitably, the antibody of the invention or antigen-binding fragment thereof is humanized. Suitably, the antibody of the invention or antigen-binding fragment thereof is humanized and comprises rabbit-derived CDRs.
The term “multispecific antibody” as used herein, refers to an antibody that binds to two or more different epitopes on at least two or more different targets (e.g., PD-L1 and HER2). The term “multispecific antibody” includes bispecific, trispecific, tetraspecific, pentaspecific and hexaspecific. The term “bispecific antibody” as used herein, refers to an antibody that binds to two different epitopes on at least two different targets (e.g., PD-L1 and HER2). The term “trispecific antibody” as used herein, refers to an antibody that binds to three different epitopes on at least three different targets (e.g., PD-L1, HER2 and HSA).
The term “epitope” means a protein determinant capable of specific binding to an antibody. Epitopes usually consist of chemically active surface groupings of molecules such as amino acids or sugar side chains and usually have specific three-dimensional structural characteristics, as well as specific charge characteristics. “Conformational” and “linear” epitopes are distinguished in that the binding to the former but not the latter is lost in the presence of denaturing solvents.
The term “conformational epitope” as used herein refers to amino acid residues of an antigen that come together on the surface when the polypeptide chain folds to form the native protein.
The term “linear epitope” refers to an epitope with all of the points of interaction between the protein and the interacting molecule (such as an antibody) occurring linearly along the primary amino acid sequence of the protein (continuous).
The term “distal epitope” refers to an epitope which is comprised in the region of the extracellular part of a cell-bound antigen that is distant from the cell surface.
The term “recognize” as used herein refers to an antibody antigen-binding fragment thereof that finds and interacts (e.g., binds) with its conformational epitope.
As used herein, the term “affinity” refers to the strength of interaction between antibody and antigen at single antigenic sites. Within each antigenic site, the variable region of the antibody “arm” interacts through weak non-covalent forces with antigen at numerous sites; the more interactions, the stronger the affinity.
“Binding affinity” generally refers to the strength of the sum total of non-covalent interactions between a single binding site of a molecule (e.g., of an antibody) and its binding partner (e.g., an antigen). Unless indicated otherwise, as used herein, “binding affinity”, “bind to”, “binds to” or “binding to” refers to intrinsic binding affinity that reflects a 1:1 interaction between members of a binding pair (e.g., an antibody fragment and antigen). The affinity of a molecule X for its partner Y can generally be represented by the dissociation constant (KD). Affinity can be measured by common methods known in the art, including those described herein.
Low-affinity antibodies generally bind antigen slowly and tend to dissociate readily, whereas high-affinity antibodies generally bind antigen faster and tend to remain bound longer. A variety of methods of measuring binding affinity are known in the art, any of which can be used for purposes of the present invention. Specific illustrative and exemplary embodiments for measuring binding affinity, i.e. binding strength are described in the following.
The term “Kassoc”, “Ka” or “Kon”, as used herein, is intended to refer to the association rate of a particular antibody-antigen interaction, whereas the term “Kdis”, “Kd” or “Koff”, as used herein, is intended to refer to the dissociation rate of a particular antibody-antigen interaction. In one embodiment, the term “KD”, as used herein, is intended to refer to the dissociation constant, which is obtained from the ratio of Kd to Ka (i.e. Kd/Ka) and is expressed as a molar concentration (M). The “KD” or “KD value” or “KD” or “KD value” according to this invention is in one embodiment measured by using surface-plasmon resonance assays. Affinity to PD-L1 was determined by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) measurements as described in section [0185]. Binding affinities of multi-specific constructs towards recombinant human CD3E ECD, recombinant human IL-23R and recombinant human Her2 ECD were measured by SPR as described in section [0198]. Affinity of molecules to human serum albumin (HSA) and mouse serum albumin (MSA) was determined by SPR measurements as described in section [0199].
Suitably, the multispecific antibody of the present invention is monovalent, bivalent or multivalent for PD-L1 specificity. In one embodiment, the multispecific antibody of the present invention is bivalent for PD-L1 specificity. In a preferred embodiment, the multispecific antibody of the present invention is monovalent for PD-L1 specificity.
Suitable PD-L1-BDs for use in the multispecific antibody of the invention are binding domains provided in the present disclosure. The PD-L1-BDs of the invention include, but are not limited to, the humanized monoclonal antibodies whose sequences are listed in Table 1.
Suitably, the multispecific antibody of the present invention is monovalent, bivalent or multivalent for HER2 specificity. In one embodiment, the multispecific antibody of the present invention is bivalent for HER2 specificity. In a preferred embodiment, the multispecific antibody of the present invention is monovalent for HER2 specificity.
Suitable HER2-BDs for use in the multispecific antibody of the invention are binding domains provided in the present disclosure. The HER2-BDs of the invention include, but are not limited to, the humanized monoclonal antibodies whose sequences are listed in Table 2.
The term “multivalent antibody” refers to a single binding molecule with more than one valency, where “valency” is described as the number of antigen-binding moieties that binds to epitopes on identical target molecules. As such, the single binding molecule can bind to more than one binding site on a target molecule. Examples of multivalent antibodies include, but are not limited to bivalent antibodies, trivalent antibodies, tetravalent antibodies, pentavalent antibodies, and the like.
The term “monovalent antibody”, as used herein, refers to an antibody that binds to a single epitope on a target molecule, such as PD-L1. Also, the term “binding domain” or “monovalent binding domain”, as used herein, refers to a binding domain that binds to a single epitope on a target molecule such as PD-L1.
The term “bivalent antibody” as used herein, refers to an antibody that binds to two epitopes on at least two identical target molecules, such as PD-L1target molecules.
The inventors of the present invention have now surprisingly found that addition of the tri-specific molecule PRO1678 (anti-HSA×PDL1×HER2) resulted in a significantly reduced tumor growth in a HCC1954 xenograft NOG mouse model when compared to an equipotent dose (same activity as determined in vitro) of nivolumab. A five-time lower dose of PRO1678 led to the same reduction of tumor growth in this model (see
The term “tumor-associated immune checkpoint antigen” refers to a transmembrane protein expressed by the tumor that suppresses the activity of immune cells, particularly to an antigen taken from the group of: PD-L1, PD-L2, CD80, CD86, CD276 (B7-H3), and VTCN1 (B7-H4), more particularly PD-L1.
The term “low affinity” refers to a binding domain that binds to its cognate target with a dissociation constant (KD) of between 50 nM and 2000 nM, preferably between 100 nM and 1000 nM.
The term “tumor-associated antigen (TAA)” refers to an antigen that is expressed on the surface of a tumor cell. In particular embodiments, a TAA is an antigen that is preferentially expressed on a tumor cell when compared to non-tumor cells, particularly wherein expression of the TAA on a tumor cell is at least more than 5 fold, at least more than 10 fold, at least more than 20 fold, at least more than 50 fold, or at least more than 100 fold higher than on non-tumor cells from the same organism or patient. In particular, the TAA is taken from the group of: EGFRvIII, mesothelin, GD2, Tn antigen, sTn antigen, Tn-O-Glycopeptides, sTn-O-Glycopeptides, PSMA, CD97, TAG72, CD44v6, CEA, EPCAM, KIT, IL-13Ra2, leguman, GD3, CD171, IL-11 Ra, PSCA, MAD-CT-1, MAD-CT-2, VEGFR2, LewisY, CD24, PDGFR-beta, SSEA-4, folate receptor alpha, ERBBs (e.g., ERBB2), Her2/neu (HER2), MUC1, EGFR, NCAM, Ephrin B2, CAIX, LMP2, sLe, HMWMAA, o-acetyl-GD2, folate receptor beta, TEM1/CD248, TEM7R, FAP, Legumain, HPV E6 or E7, ML-IAP, CLDN6, TSHR, GPRC5D, ALK, Polysialic acid, Fos-related antigen, neutrophil elastase, TRP-2, CYP1B1, sperm protein 17, beta human chorionic gonadotropin, AFP, thyroglobulin, PLAC1, globoH, RAGE1, MN-CA IX, human telomerase reverse transcriptase, intestinal carboxyl esterase, mut hsp 70-2, NA-17, NY-BR-1, UPK2, HAVCR1, ADRB3, PANX3, NY-ESO-1, GPR20, Ly6k, OR51E2, TARP, and GFRalpha4.
The term “immune cell antigen” refers to an antigen present in an immune cell, particularly an immune cell selected from a T cell, an NK cell, and myeloid cells. In particular, the term relates to a protein, which is a stimulatory or co-stimulatory molecule of said immune cell.
In the context of the present invention, the term “stimulatory molecule of said immune cells” relates to molecules such as CD3 and CD16.
In the context of the present invention, the term “co-stimulatory molecule of said immune cells” relates to molecules such as the molecules comprised in the group of molecules consisting of CD137, CD28, ICOS, HVEM, CD27, OX40, DR3, GITR, CD30, SLAM, CD2, 2B4, TIM1, TIM2, and CD226.
In particular embodiments, the multispecific antibody of the present invention furthermore comprises (i) a binding domain for CD3, or (ii) a binding domain for CD137.
Suitable CD3-BDs for use in the multispecific antibody of the invention are binding domains provided in the present disclosure. The CD3-BDs of the invention include, but are not limited to, the humanized monoclonal antibodies whose sequences are listed in Table 3.
Suitable CD137-BDs for use in the multispecific antibody of the invention are binding domains provided in the present disclosure. The CD137-BDs of the invention include, but are not limited to, the humanized monoclonal antibodies whose sequences are listed in Table 5.
Suitably, the multispecific antibody of the invention has two different specificities (PD-L1 and HER2). Suitably, the multispecific antibody of the invention is a bispecific antibody. The multispecific antibody of the present invention may comprise a further specificity (trispecific) or specificities (tetraspecific, pentaspecific or hexaspecific antibody). In one embodiment, the multispecific antibody is trispecific. In another embodiment, the multispecific antibody is tetraspecific
In one embodiment, the multispecific antibody of the invention comprises an immunoglobulin Fc region polypeptide. The term “Fc region” herein is used to define a C-terminal region of an immunoglobulin heavy chain, including native-sequence Fc regions and variant Fc regions. Suitable native-sequence Fc regions include human IgG1, IgG2 (IgG2A, JgG2B), IgG3 and IgG4. “Fc receptor” or “FcR” describes a receptor that binds to the Fc region of an antibody. The preferred FcR is a native sequence human FcR. Moreover, a preferred FcR is one which binds an IgG antibody (a gamma receptor) and includes receptors of the FcγRI, FcγRII, and FcγRIII subclasses, including allelic variants and alternatively spliced forms of these receptors, FcγRII receptors include FcγRIIA (an “activating receptor”) and FcγRI IB (an “inhibiting receptor”), which have similar amino acid sequences that differ primarily in the cytoplasmic domains thereof. Activating receptor FcγRIIA contains an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) in its cytoplasmic domain. Inhibiting receptor FcγRIIB contains an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif (ITIM) in its cytoplasmic domain, (see M. Daeron, Annu. Rev. Immunol. 5:203-234 (1997). FcRs are reviewed in Ravetch and Kinet, Annu. Rev. Immunol. 9: 457-92 (1991); Capet et al, Immunomethods 4: 25-34 (1994); and de Haas et al, J. Lab. Clin. Med. 126: 330-41 (1995). Other FcRs, including those to be identified in the future, are encompassed by the term “FcR” herein. The term “Fc receptor” or “FcR” also includes the neonatal receptor, FcRn, which is responsible for the transfer of maternal IgGs to the fetus. Guyer et al., J. Immunol. 117: 587 (1976) and Kim et al., J. Immunol. 24: 249 (1994). Methods of measuring binding to FcRn are known (see, e.g., Ghetie and Ward, Immunol. Today 18: (12): 592-8 (1997); Ghetie et al., Nature Biotechnology 15 (7): 637-40 (1997); Hinton et al., J. Biol. Chem. TJI (8): 6213-6 (2004); WO 2004/92219 (Hinton et al). Binding to FcRn in vivo and serum half-life of human FcRn high-affinity binding polypeptides can be assayed, e.g., in transgenic mice or transfected human cell lines expressing human FcRn, or in primates to which the polypeptides having a variant Fc region are administered. WO 2004/42072 (Presta) describes antibody variants which improved or diminished binding to FcRs. See also, e.g., Shields et al., J. Biol. Chem. 9(2): 6591-6604 (2001).
In another embodiment, the antibody of the invention does not comprise an immunoglobulin Fc region polypeptide.
In order to increase the number of specificities/functionalities at the same or lower molecular weight, it is advantageous to use antibodies comprising antibody fragments, such as Fv, Fab, Fab′ and F(ab′)2 fragments and other antibody fragments. These smaller molecules retain the antigen binding activity of the whole antibody and can also exhibit improved tissue penetration and pharmacokinetic properties in comparison to the whole immunoglobulin molecules. Whilst such fragments appear to exhibit a number of advantages over whole immunoglobulins, they also suffer from an increased rate of clearance from serum since they lack the Fc domain that imparts a long half-life in vivo (Medasan et al., 1997, J. Immunol. 158:2211-2217). Molecules with lower molecular weights penetrate more efficiently into target tissues (e.g. solid cancers) and thus hold the promise for improved efficacy at the same or lower dose.
The inventors have surprisingly found that an addition of human serum albumin binding domain (HSA-BD) to the multispecific antibody of the invention does not interfere with the ability of the other binding domains to bind to their respective targets This finding is insofar surprising as it cannot a priori be expected that all four binding domains remain functional without sterically or otherwise inhibiting each other in a complex multi-target, multi-cell in vivo situation.
Suitably, the multispecific antibody of the present invention may comprise a further binding domain having specificity to human serum albumin. In one embodiment, the multispecific antibody comprises: (i) at least one PD-L1-BD; (ii) at least one HER2-BD; and (iii) at least one HSA-BD. Suitably, the multispecific antibody of the present invention comprises: (i) one PD-L1-BD; (ii) at least one HER2-BD, preferably one PD-L1-BD or two PD-L1-BDs, more preferably one PD-L1-BD; and (iii) at least one HSA-BD, preferably one HSA-BD.
The term “HSA” refers in particular to human serum albumin with UniProt ID number P02768. Human Serum Albumin (HSA) is 66.4 kDa abundant protein in human serum (50% of total protein) composing of 585 amino acids (Sugio, Protein Eng, Vol. 12, 1999, 439-446). Multifunctional HSA protein is associated with its structure that allowed to bind and transport a number of metabolizes such as fatty acids, metal ions, bilirubin and some drugs (Fanali, Molecular Aspects of Medicine, Vol. 33, 2012, 209-290). HSA concentration in serum is around 3.5-5 g/dL. Albumin binding antibodies and fragments thereof may be used for example, for extending the in vivo serum half-life of drugs or proteins conjugated thereto.
In some embodiments, the HSA-BD is derived from a monoclonal antibody or antibody fragment.
Suitable HSA-BDs for use in the multispecific antibody of the invention are binding domains provided in the present disclosure. The HSA-BDs of the invention include, but are not limited to, the humanized monoclonal antibodies whose sequences are listed in Table 4.
In particular, the HSA-BDs of the invention specifically bind to human serum albumin. The HSA-BDs of the invention comprise a VH CDR having an amino acid sequence of any one of the VH CDRs listed in Table 4. In particular, the invention provides HSA-BDs comprising (one, two, three, or more VH CDRs having an amino acid sequence of any of the VH CDRs listed in Table 4.
The invention also provides HSA-BDs comprising a VL CDR having an amino acid sequence of any one of the VL CDRs listed in Table 4. In particular, the invention provides HSA-BDs comprising one, two, three or more VL CDRs having an amino acid sequence of any of the VL CDRs listed in Table 4.
In a further embodiment, the invention provides an HSA-BD that specifically binds human serum albumin, wherein said binding domain comprises a VH domain and a VL domain.
Another suitable HSA-BD for use in the multispecific antibody of the invention comprises or is derived from an antibody selected from the group consisting of: (i) polypeptides that bind serum albumin (see, for example, Smith et al., 2001, Bioconjugate Chem. 12:750-756; EP0486525; U.S. Pat. No. 6,267,964; WO 2004/001064; WO 2002/076489; and WO 2001/45746); (ii) anti-serum albumin binding single variable domains described in Holt et al., Protein Engineering, Design & Selection, vol 21, 5, pp 283-288, WO 2004/003019, WO 2008/096158, WO 2005/118642, WO 2006/0591056 and WO 2011/006915; (iii) anti-serum albumin antibodies described in WO 2009/040562, WO 2010/035012 and WO 2011/086091.
In particular embodiments, the multispecific antibodies of the invention comprise an HSA binding domain having the CDR sequences as defined in SEQ ID NOs: 61 to 66 and VH/VL sequences as defined in SEQ ID NOs: 67 to 70.
These HSA-BDs exhibit particular advantageous properties, in particular a high stability and cross-reactivity to cynomolgus serum albumin (CSA) and mouse serum albumin (MSA), to further improve the already advantageous properties of the multispecific antibodies of the invention. More specifically, said HSA-BDs are characterized by one or more of the following parameters:
Other variable domains of the invention include amino acids that have been mutated, yet have at least 60, 70, 80, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98 or 99 percent identity in the CDR regions with the CDR regions depicted in the sequences described in Tables 1 to 5. Other variable domains of the invention include mutant amino acid sequences wherein no more than 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 amino acids have been mutated in the CDR regions when compared with the CDR regions depicted in the sequence described in Tables 1 to 5.
Suitably, the VH domains of the binding domains of the invention belong to a VH3 or VH4 family. In one embodiment, a binding domain of the invention comprises a VH domain belonging to the VH3 family. In the context of the present invention, the term “belonging to VHx family (or VLx family)” means that the framework sequences FR1 to FR2 show the highest degree of homology to said VHx family (or VLx, respectively). Examples of VH and VL families are given in Knappik et al., J. Mol. Biol. 296 (2000) 57-86, or in WO 2019/057787. A specific example of a VH domain belonging to VH3 family is represented by SEQ ID NO: 142, and a specific example of a VH domain belonging to VH4 family is represented by SEQ ID NO: 143. In particular, framework regions FR1 to FR4 taken from SEQ ID NO: 142 belong to VH3 family (Table 7, regions marked in non-bold). Suitably, a VH belonging to VH3 family, as used herein, is a VH comprising FR1 to FR4 having at least 85%, preferably at least 90%, more preferably at least 95% sequence identity to FR1 to FR4 of SEQ ID NO: 142. Alternative examples of VH3 sequences, and examples of VH4 sequences, may be found in Knappik et al., J. Mol. Biol. 296 (2000) 57-86 or in WO 2019/057787. Suitably, the HSA-BD of the invention comprises: VK frameworks FR1, FR2 and FR3, particularly VK1 or VK3 frameworks, preferably VK1 frameworks FR1 to 3, and a framework FR4, which is selected from a VK FR4, particularly VK1 FR4, VK3 FR4, and a Vλ FR4. Suitable VK1 frameworks FR1 to 3 are set forth in SEQ ID NO: 144 (Table 7, FR regions are marked in non-bold). Alternative examples of VK1 sequences, and examples of VK2, VK3 or VK4 sequences, may be found in Knappik et al., J. Mol. Biol. 296 (2000) 57-86. Suitable VK1 frameworks FR1 to 3 comprise the amino acid sequences having at least 60, 70, 80, 90 percent identity to amino acid sequences corresponding to FR1 to 3 and taken from SEQ ID NO: 144 (Table 7, FR regions are marked in non-bold). Suitable Vλ FR4 are as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 145 to SEQ ID NO: 152. In one embodiment, the VL domains of the present invention comprises Vλ FR4 comprising the amino acid sequence having at least 60, 70, 80, 90 percent identity to an amino acid sequence selected from any of SEQ ID NO: 145 to SEQ ID NO: 152, preferably to SEQ ID NO: 146 or 152.
The binding domains of the invention comprises a VH domain listed in Tables 1 to 5. Suitably, a binding domain of the invention comprises a VH amino acid sequence listed in one of Tables 1 to 5, wherein no more than about 10 amino acids in a framework sequence (for example, a sequence which is not a CDR) have been mutated (wherein a mutation is, as various non-limiting examples, an addition, substitution or deletion). Suitably, a binding domain of the present invention comprises a VH amino acid sequence listed in one of Tables 1 to 5, wherein no more than about 20 amino acids in a framework sequence (for example, a sequence which is not a CDR) have been mutated (wherein a mutation is, as various non-limiting examples, an addition, substitution or deletion). Other binding domains of the invention include amino acids that have been mutated, yet have at least 60, 70, 80, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98 or 99 percent identity in the VH regions with the VH regions depicted in the corresponding sequences described in one of Tables 1 to 5.
In particular, a binding domain of the invention comprises a VL domain listed in one of Tables 1 to 5. Suitably, a binding domain of the invention comprises a VL amino acid sequence listed in one of Tables 1 to 5, wherein no more than about 10 amino acids in a framework sequence (for example, a sequence which is not a CDR) have been mutated (wherein a mutation is, as various non-limiting examples, an addition, substitution or deletion). Suitably, a binding domain of the invention comprises a VL amino acid sequence listed in one of Tables 1 to 5, wherein no more than about 20 amino acids in a framework sequence (for example, a sequence which is not a CDR) have been mutated (wherein a mutation is, as various non-limiting examples, an addition, substitution or deletion). Other binding domains of the invention include amino acids that have been mutated, yet have at least 60, 70, 80, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98 or 99 percent identity in the VL regions with a VL region depicted in the sequences described in Tables 1 to 5.
In the context of the present invention, the term “binding domain of the present invention” relates both to a binding domain a such, i.e. independent of a multispecific context, and, in particular, to a binding domain comprised in a multispecific construct, e.g. one of the binding domains comprised in a bispecific, trispecific or tetraspecific construct.
Suitably, a binding domain of the invention is selected from the group consisting of: a Fab, an Fv, an scFv, dsFv, a scAb, and STAB.
Suitably, a binding domain of the invention is an scFv antibody fragment.
The multispecific antibody of the invention may be in any suitable format.
Suitably, the binding domains of the multispecific antibody are operably linked. The binding domains of the multispecific antibody of the invention are capable of binding to their respective antigens or receptors simultaneously.
In one embodiment, the multispecific antibody of the invention comprises at least one PD-L1-BD, at least one HER2-BD, wherein: (i) said PD-L1-BD and said HER2-BD are both operably linked to each other. In one embodiment, the multispecific antibody of the invention comprises at least one PD-L1-BD, at least one HER2-BD, at least one HSA-BD, wherein: (i) said PD-L1-BD and said HER2-BD are both operably linked to said HSA-BD; or (ii) said PD-L1-BD and said HSA-BD are both operably linked to said HER2-BD; or (iii) said HER2-BD and said HSA-BD are both operably linked to said PD-L1-BD. In a preferred embodiment, the multispecific antibody of the invention comprises at least one PD-L1-BD, at least one HER2-BD, at least one HSA-BD, wherein said PD-L1-BD and said HSA-BD are both operably linked to said HER2-BD.
The term “operably linked”, as used herein, indicates that two molecules (e.g., polypeptides, domains, binding domains) are attached so as to each retain functional activity. Two molecules can be “operably linked” whether they are attached directly or indirectly (e.g., via a linker, via a moiety, via a linker to a moiety). The term “linker” refers to a peptide or other moiety that is optionally located between binding domains or antibody fragments of the invention. A number of strategies may be used to covalently link molecules together. These include, but are not limited to, polypeptide linkages between N- and C-termini of proteins or protein domains, linkage via disulfide bonds, and linkage via chemical cross-linking reagents. In one aspect of this embodiment, the linker is a peptide bond, generated by recombinant techniques or peptide synthesis. Choosing a suitable linker for a specific case where two polypeptide chains are to be connected depends on various parameters, including but not limited to the nature of the two polypeptide chains (e.g., whether they naturally oligomerize), the distance between the N- and the C-termini to be connected if known, and/or the stability of the linker towards proteolysis and oxidation. Furthermore, the linker may contain amino acid residues that provide flexibility.
In the context of the present invention, the term “polypeptide linker” refers to a linker consisting of a chain of amino acid residues linked by peptide bonds that is connecting two domains, each being attached to one end of the linker. The polypeptide linker should have a length that is adequate to link two molecules in such a way that they assume the correct conformation relative to one another so that they retain the desired activity. In particular embodiments, the polypeptide linker has a continuous chain of between 2 and 30 amino acid residues (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, or 30 amino acid residues). In addition, the amino acid residues selected for inclusion in the polypeptide linker should exhibit properties that do not interfere significantly with the activity of the polypeptide. Thus, the linker peptide on the whole should not exhibit a charge that would be inconsistent with the activity of the polypeptide, or interfere with internal folding, or form bonds or other interactions with amino acid residues in one or more of the monomers that would seriously impede the binding of receptor monomer domains. In particular embodiments, the polypeptide linker is non-structured polypeptide. Useful linkers include glycine-serine, or GS linkers. By “Gly-Ser” or “GS” linkers is meant a polymer of glycines and serines in series (including, for example, (Gly-Ser)n, (GSGGS)n (GGGGS)n and (GGGS)n, where n is an integer of at least one), glycine-alanine polymers, alanine-serine polymers, and other flexible linkers such as the tether for the shaker potassium channel, and a large variety of other flexible linkers, as will be appreciated by those in the art. Glycine-serine polymers are preferred since both of these amino acids are relatively unstructured, and therefore may be able to serve as a neutral tether between components. Secondly, serine is hydrophilic and therefore able to solubilize what could be a globular glycine chain. Third, similar chains have been shown to be effective in joining subunits of recombinant proteins such as single chain antibodies.
Suitably, the multispecific antibody is in a format selected from any suitable multispecific, e.g. bispecific, format known in the art, including, by way of non-limiting example, formats based on a single-chain diabody (scDb), a tandem scDb (Tandab), a linear dimeric scDb (LD-scDb), a circular dimeric scDb (CD-scDb), a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE; tandem di-scFv), a tandem tri-scFv, a tribody (Fab-(scFv)2) or bibody (Fab-(scFv)1), Fab, Fab-Fv2, Morrison (IgG CH3-scFv fusion (Morrison L) or IgG CL-scFv fusion (Morrison H)), triabody, scDb-scFv, bispecific Fab2, di-miniantibody, tetrabody, scFv-Fc-scFv fusion, scFv-HSA-scFv fusion, di-diabody, DVD-Ig, COVD, IgG-scFab, scFab-dsscFv, Fv2-Fc, IgG-scFv fusions, such as bsAb (scFv linked to C-terminus of light chain), Bs1Ab (scFv linked to N-terminus of light chain), Bs2Ab (scFv linked to N-terminus of heavy chain), Bs3Ab (scFv linked to C-terminus of heavy chain), Ts1Ab (scFv linked to N-terminus of both heavy chain and light chain), Ts2Ab (dsscFv linked to C-terminus of heavy chain), Bispecific antibodies based on heterodimeric Fc domains, such as Knob-into-Hole antibodies (KiHs) (bispecific IgGs prepared by the KiH technology); an Fv, scFv, scDb, tandem-di-scFv, tandem tri-scFv, Fab-(scFv)2, Fab-(scFv)1, Fab, Fab-Fv2, COVD fused to the N- and/or the C-terminus of either chain of a heterodimeric Fc domain or any other heterodimerization domain, a MATCH (described in WO 2016/0202457; Egan T., et al., mAbs 9 (2017) 68-84) and DuoBodies (bispecific IgGs prepared by the Duobody technology) (MAbs. 2017 February/March; 9(2):182-212. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2016.1268307). Particularly suitable for use herein is a single-chain diabody (scDb) or scDb-scFv.
In one embodiment, the multispecific antibody of the invention is in a format selected from the list consisting of scDb (diabody), scDb-scFv, triabody, and tribody. Particularly suitable for use herein is a single-chain diabody (scDb), in particular a bispecific monomeric scDb. Also, particularly suitable for use herein is a scDb-scFv, in particular wherein said CD137-BD and said PD-L1-BD are in the form of a scDb and said HSA-BD is an scFv operably linked to said scDb.
The term “diabodies” refers to antibody fragments with two antigen-binding sites, which fragments comprise a VH connected to VL in the same polypeptide chain (VH-VL). By using a linker that is too short to allow pairing between the two domains on the same chain, the domains are forced to pair with the complementary domains of another chain to create two antigen-binding sites. Diabodies may be bivalent or bispecific. Diabodies are described more fully in, for example, EP404097, WO 93/01161, Hudson et al., Nat. Med. 9:129-134 (2003), and Hollinger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 6444-6448 (1993). Triabodies and tetrabodies are also described in Hudson et al., Nat. Med. 9:129-134 (2003).
The bispecific scDb, in particular the bispecific monomeric scDb, particularly comprises two variable heavy chain domains (VH) or fragments thereof and two variable light chain domains (VL) or fragments thereof connected by linkers L1, L2 and L3 in the order VHA-L1-VLB-L2-VHB-L3-VLA, VHA-L1-VHB-L2-VLB-L3-VLA, VLA-L1-VLB-L2-VHB-L3-VHA, VLA-L1-VHB-L2-VLB-L3-VHA, VHB-L1-VLA-L2-VHA-L3-VLB, VHB-L1-VHA-L2-VLA-L3-VLB, VLB-L1-VLA-L2-VHA-L3-VHB or VLB-L1-VHA-L2-VLA-L3-VHB, wherein the VLA and VHA domains jointly form the antigen binding site for the first antigen, and VLB and VHB jointly form the antigen binding site for the second antigen.
The linker L1 particularly is a peptide of 2-10 amino acids, more particularly 3-7 amino acids, and most particularly 5 amino acids, and linker L3 particularly is a peptide of 1-10 amino acids, more particularly 2-7 amino acids, and most particularly 5 amino acids. In particular embodiments, the linker L1 and/or L3 comprises one or two units of four (4) glycine amino acid residues and one (1) serine amino acid residue (GGGGS)n, wherein n=1 or 2, preferably n=1.
The middle linker L2 particularly is a peptide of 10-40 amino acids, more particularly 15-30 amino acids, and most particularly 20-25 amino acids. In particular embodiments, said linker L2 comprises one or more units of four (4) glycine amino acid residues and one (1) serine amino acid residue (GGGGS)n, wherein n=1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8, preferably n=4.
In one embodiment, the multispecific antibody of the invention is a scDb-scFv. The term “scDb-scFv” refers to an antibody format, wherein a single-chain Fv (scFv) fragment is fused by a flexible Gly-Ser linker to a single-chain diabody (scDb). In one embodiment, said flexible Gly-Ser linker is a peptide of 2-40 amino acids, e.g., 2-35, 2-30, 2-25, 2-20, 2-15, 2-10 amino acids, particularly 10 amino acids. In particular embodiments, said linker comprises one or more units of four (4) glycine amino acid residues and one (1) serine amino acid residue (GGGGS)n, wherein n=1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8, preferably n=2.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the multispecific antibody of the invention is in a MATCH format described in WO 2016/0202457; Egan T., et al., mAbs 9 (2017) 68-84.
The multispecific antibody of the invention can be produced using any convenient antibody manufacturing method known in the art (see, e.g., Fischer, N. & Leger, O., Pathobiology 74 (2007) 3-14 with regard to the production of bispecific constructs; Hornig, N. & Fsrber-Schwarz, A., Methods Mol. Biol. 907 (2012)713-727, and WO 99/57150 with regard to bispecific diabodies and tandem scFvs). Specific examples of suitable methods for the preparation of the bispecific construct of the invention further include, inter alia, the Genmab (see Labrijn et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 (2013) 5145-5150) and Merus (see de Kruif et al., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 106 (2010) 741-750) technologies. Methods for production of bispecific antibodies comprising a functional antibody Fc part are also known in the art (see, e.g., Zhu et al., Cancer Lett. 86 (1994) 127-134); and Suresh et al., Methods Enzymol. 121 (1986) 210-228).
These methods typically involve the generation of monoclonal antibodies, for example by means of fusing myeloma cells with the spleen cells from a mouse that has been immunized with the desired antigen using the hybridoma technology (see, e.g., Yokoyama et al., Curr. Protoc. Immunol. Chapter 2, Unit 2.5, 2006) or by means of recombinant antibody engineering (repertoire cloning or phage display/yeast display) (see, e.g., Chames & Baty, FEMS Microbiol. Letters 189 (2000) 1-8), and the combination of the antigen-binding domains or fragments or parts thereof of two or more different monoclonal antibodies to give a bispecific or multispecific construct using known molecular cloning techniques.
The multispecific molecules of the invention can be prepared by conjugating the constituent binding specificities, using methods known in the art. For example, each binding specificity of the bispecific molecule can be generated separately and then conjugated to one another. When the binding specificities are proteins or peptides, a variety of coupling or cross-linking agents can be used for covalent conjugation. Examples of cross-linking agents include protein A, carbodiimide, N-succinimidyl-5-acetyl-thioacetate (SATA), 5,5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB), o-phenylenedimaleimide (oPDM), N-succinimidyl-3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate (SPDP), and sulfosuccinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohaxane-I-carboxylate (sulfo-SMCC) (see e.g., Karpovsky et al., 1984 J. Exp. Med. 160: 1686; Liu, M A et al., 1985 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:8648). Other methods include those described in Paulus, 1985 Behring Ins. Mitt. No. 78, 118-132; Brennan et al., 1985 Science 229:81-83), and Glennie et al., 1987 J. Immunol. 139: 2367-2375). Conjugating agents are SATA and sulfo-SMCC, both available from Pierce Chemical Co. (Rockford, 111).
When the binding specificities are antibodies, they can be conjugated by sulfhydryl bonding of the C-terminus hinge regions of the two heavy chains. In a particular embodiment, the hinge region is modified to contain an odd number of sulfhydryl residues, for example one, prior to conjugation.
Alternatively, two or more binding specificities can be encoded in the same vector and expressed and assembled in the same host cell. This method is particularly useful where the bispecific molecule is a mAb X mAb, mAb X Fab, Fab X F (ab′)2 or ligand X Fab fusion protein. A multispecific antibody of the invention can be a single chain molecule comprising one single chain antibody and a binding determinant, or a single chain multispecific antibody comprising two binding determinants. Multispecific antibody may comprise at least two single chain molecules. Methods for preparing multispecific antibodies and molecules are described for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,260,203; 5,455,030; 4,881,175; 5,132,405; 5,091,513; 5,476,786; 5,013,653; 5,258,498; and 5,482,858.
Binding of the multispecific antibodies to their specific targets can be confirmed by, for example, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), radioimmunoassay (REA), FACS analysis, bioassay (e.g., growth inhibition), or Western Blot assay. Each of these assays generally detects the presence of protein-antibody complexes of particular interest by employing a labeled reagent (e.g., an antibody) specific for the complex of interest.
In a further aspect, the invention provides a nucleic acid encoding the multispecific antibody of the invention or fragments thereof or binding domains thereof. Such nucleic acid sequences can be optimized for expression in mammalian cells.
The term “nucleic acid” is used herein interchangeably with the term “polynucleotide(s)” and refers to one or more deoxyribonucleotides or ribonucleotides and polymers thereof in either single- or double-stranded form. The term encompasses nucleic acids containing known nucleotide analogs or modified backbone residues or linkages, which are synthetic, naturally occurring, and non-naturally occurring, which have similar binding properties as the reference nucleic acid, and which are metabolized in a manner similar to the reference nucleotides. Examples of such analogs include, without limitation, phosphorothioates, phosphoramidates, methyl phosphonates, chiral-methyl phosphorates, 2-O-methyl ribonucleotides, peptide-nucleic acids (PNAs). Unless otherwise indicated, a particular nucleic acid sequence also implicitly encompasses conservatively modified variants thereof (e.g., degenerate codon substitutions) and complementary sequences, as well as the sequence explicitly indicated. Specifically, as detailed below, degenerate codon substitutions may be achieved by generating sequences in which the third position of one or more selected (or all) codons is substituted with mixed-base and/or deoxyinosine residues (Batzer et al., Nucleic Acid Res. 19:5081, 1991; Ohtsuka et al., J. Biol. Chem. 260:2605-2608, 1985; and Rossolini et al., Mol. Cell. Probes 8:91-98, 1994).
The invention provides substantially purified nucleic acid molecules which encode polypeptides comprising segments or domains of the multispecific antibody described above. When expressed from appropriate expression vectors, polypeptides encoded by these nucleic acid molecules are capable of exhibiting antigen binding capacity or capacities of the multispecific antibody of the present invention.
Also provided in the invention are polynucleotides which encode at least one CDR region and usually all three CDR regions of the binding domains of the multispecific antibody of the present invention set forth in Tables 1 to 4. Because of the degeneracy of the code, a variety of nucleic acid sequences will encode each of the immunoglobulin amino acid sequences.
The polynucleotide sequences can be produced by de novo solid-phase DNA synthesis or by PCR mutagenesis of an existing sequence (e.g., sequences as described in the Examples below) encoding the multispecific antibody of the invention or fragments thereof or binding domains thereof. Direct chemical synthesis of nucleic acids can be accomplished by methods known in the art, such as the phosphotriester method of Narang et al., 1979, Meth. Enzymol. 68:90; the phosphodiester method of Brown et al., Meth. Enzymol. 68: 109, 1979; the diethylphosphoramidite method of Beaucage et al., Tetra. Lett., 22: 1859, 1981; and the solid support method of U.S. Pat. No. 4,458,066. Introducing mutations to a polynucleotide sequence by PCR can be performed as described in, e.g., PCR Technology: Principles and Applications for DNA Amplification, H. A. Erlich (Ed.), Freeman Press, NY, N.Y., 1992; PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Innis et al. (Ed.), Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., 1990; Mattila et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 19:967, 1991; and Eckert et al., PCR Methods and Applications 1:17, 1991.
Also provided in the invention are expression vectors and host cells for producing the multispecific antibody of the invention or fragments thereof or binding domains thereof.
The term “vector” is intended to refer to a polynucleotide molecule capable of transporting another polynucleotide to which it has been linked. One type of vector is a “plasmid”, which refers to a circular double stranded DNA loop into which additional DNA segments may be ligated. Another type of vector is a viral vector, wherein additional DNA segments may be ligated into the viral genome. Certain vectors are capable of autonomous replication in a host cell into which they are introduced (e.g., bacterial vectors having a bacterial origin of replication and episomal mammalian vectors). Other vectors (e.g., non-episomal mammalian vectors) can be integrated into the genome of a host cell upon introduction into the host cell, and thereby are replicated along with the host genome.
Moreover, certain vectors are capable of directing the expression of genes to which they are operatively linked. Such vectors are referred to herein as “recombinant expression vectors” (or simply, “expression vectors”). In general, expression vectors of utility in recombinant DNA techniques are often in the form of plasmids. In the present specification, “plasmid” and “vector” may be used interchangeably as the plasmid is the most commonly used form of vector. However, the invention is intended to include such other forms of expression vectors, such as viral vectors (e.g., replication defective retroviruses, adenoviruses and adenoassociated viruses), which serve equivalent functions. In this particular context, the term “operably linked” refers to a functional relationship between two or more polynucleotide (e.g., DNA) segments. Typically, it refers to the functional relationship of a transcriptional regulatory sequence to a transcribed sequence. For example, a promoter or enhancer sequence is operably linked to a coding sequence if it stimulates or modulates the transcription of the coding sequence in an appropriate host cell or other expression system. Generally, promoter transcriptional regulatory sequences that are operably linked to a transcribed sequence are physically contiguous to the transcribed sequence, i.e., they are cis-acting. However, some transcriptional regulatory sequences, such as enhancers, need not be physically contiguous or located in close proximity to the coding sequences whose transcription they enhance.
Various expression vectors can be employed to express the polynucleotides encoding the multispecific antibody chains or binding fragments. Both viral-based and nonviral expression vectors can be used to produce the antibodies in a mammalian host cell. Nonviral vectors and systems include plasmids, episomal vectors, typically with an expression cassette for expressing a protein or RNA, and human artificial chromosomes (see, e.g., Harrington et al., Nat Genet. 15:345, 1997). For example, nonviral vectors useful for expression of the CD137-binding polynucleotides and polypeptides in mammalian (e.g., human) cells include pThioHis A, B and C, pcDNA3.1/His, pEBVHis A, B and C, (Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.), MPS V vectors, and numerous other vectors known in the art for expressing other proteins. Useful viral vectors include vectors based on retroviruses, adenoviruses, adenoassociated viruses, herpes viruses, vectors based on SV40, papilloma virus, HBP Epstein Barr virus, vaccinia virus vectors and Semliki Forest virus (SFV). See, Brent et al., supra; Smith, Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 49:807, 1995; and Rosenfeld et al., Cell 68: 143, 1992.
The choice of expression vector depends on the intended host cells in which the vector is to be expressed. Typically, the expression vectors contain a promoter and other regulatory sequences (e.g., enhancers) that are operably linked to the polynucleotides encoding a multispecific antibody chain or a fragment. In one embodiment, an inducible promoter is employed to prevent expression of inserted sequences except under inducing conditions. Inducible promoters include, e.g., arabinose, lacZ, metallothionein promoter or a heat shock promoter. Cultures of transformed organisms can be expanded under noninducing conditions without biasing the population for coding sequences whose expression products are better tolerated by the host cells. In addition to promoters, other regulatory elements may also be required or desired for efficient expression of a multispecific antibody chain or a fragment. These elements typically include an ATG initiation codon and adjacent ribosome binding site or other sequences. In addition, the efficiency of expression may be enhanced by the inclusion of enhancers appropriate to the cell system in use (see, e.g., Scharf et al., Results Probl. Cell Differ. 20: 125, 1994; and Bittner et al., Meth. Enzymol., 153:516, 1987). For example, the SV40 enhancer or CMV enhancer may be used to increase expression in mammalian host cells.
The expression vectors may also provide a secretion signal sequence position to form a fusion protein with polypeptides encoded by inserted the multispecific antibody of the invention or fragments thereof or binding domains thereof sequences. More often, the inserted the multispecific antibody of the invention or fragments thereof or binding domains thereof sequences are linked to signal sequences before inclusion in the vector. Vectors to be used to receive sequences encoding binding domains of the multispecific antibody light and heavy chain variable domains sometimes also encode constant regions or parts thereof. Such vectors allow expression of the variable regions as fusion proteins with the constant regions thereby leading to production of intact antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof. Typically, such constant regions are human.
The term “recombinant host cell” (or simply “host cell”) refers to a cell into which a recombinant expression vector has been introduced. It should be understood that such terms are intended to refer not only to the particular subject cell but to the progeny of such a cell. Because certain modifications may occur in succeeding generations due to either mutation or environmental influences, such progeny may not, in fact, be identical to the parent cell, but are still included within the scope of the term “host cell” as used herein.
The host cells for harboring and expressing the multispecific antibody of the invention or fragments thereof or binding domains thereof can be either prokaryotic or eukaryotic. E. coli is one prokaryotic host useful for cloning and expressing the polynucleotides of the present invention. Other microbial hosts suitable for use include bacilli, such as Bacillus subtilis, and other enterobacteriaceae, such as Salmonella, Serratia, and various Pseudomonas species. In these prokaryotic hosts, one can also make expression vectors, which typically contain expression control sequences compatible with the host cell (e.g., an origin of replication). In addition, any number of a variety of well-known promoters will be present, such as the lactose promoter system, a tryptophan (trp) promoter system, a beta-lactamase promoter system, or a promoter system from phage lambda. The promoters typically control expression, optionally with an operator sequence, and have ribosome binding site sequences and the like, for initiating and completing transcription and translation. Other microbes, such as yeast, can also be employed to express CD137-binding polypeptides of the invention. Insect cells in combination with baculovirus vectors can also be used.
In one embodiment, mammalian host cells are used to express and produce the multispecific antibody of the invention or fragments thereof or binding domains thereof. For example, they can be either a hybridoma cell line expressing endogenous immunoglobulin genes or a mammalian cell line harboring an exogenous expression vector. These include any normal mortal or normal or abnormal immortal animal or human cell. For example, a number of suitable host cell lines capable of secreting intact immunoglobulins have been developed including the CHO cell lines, various Cos cell lines, HeLa cells, myeloma cell lines, transformed B-cells and hybridomas. The use of mammalian tissue cell culture to express polypeptides is discussed generally in, e.g., Winnacker, FROM GENES TO CLONES, VCH Publishers, N.Y., N.Y., 1987. Expression vectors for mammalian host cells can include expression control sequences, such as an origin of replication, a promoter, and an enhancer (see, e.g., Queen, et al., Immunol. Rev. 89:49-68, 1986), and necessary processing information sites, such as ribosome binding sites, RNA splice sites, polyadenylation sites, and transcriptional terminator sequences. These expression vectors usually contain promoters derived from mammalian genes or from mammalian viruses. Suitable promoters may be constitutive, cell type-specific, stage-specific, and/or modulatable or regulatable. Useful promoters include, but are not limited to, the metallothionein promoter, the constitutive adenovirus major late promoter, the dexamethasone-inducible MMTV promoter, the SV40 promoter, the MRP pollil promoter, the constitutive MPS V promoter, the tetracycline-inducible CMV promoter (such as the human immediate-early CMV promoter), the constitutive CMV promoter, and promoter-enhancer combinations known in the art.
Methods for introducing expression vectors containing the polynucleotide sequences of interest vary depending on the type of cellular host. For example, calcium chloride transfection is commonly utilized for prokaryotic cells, whereas calcium phosphate treatment or electroporation may be used for other cellular hosts. (See generally Sambrook, et al., supra). Other methods include, e.g., electroporation, calcium phosphate treatment, liposome-mediated transformation, injection and microinjection, ballistic methods, virosomes, immunoliposomes, polycation/nucleic acid conjugates, naked DNA, artificial virions, fusion to the herpes virus structural protein VP22 (Elliot and O'Hare, Cell 88:223, 1997), agent-enhanced uptake of DNA, and ex vivo transduction. For long-term, high-yield production of recombinant proteins, stable expression will often be desired. For example, cell lines which stably express the multispecific antibody of the invention or fragments thereof or binding domains thereof can be prepared using expression vectors of the invention which contain viral origins of replication or endogenous expression elements and a selectable marker gene. Following the introduction of the vector, cells may be allowed to grow for 1-2 days in an enriched media before they are switched to selective media. The purpose of the selectable marker is to confer resistance to selection, and its presence allows growth of cells which successfully express the introduced sequences in selective media. Resistant, stably transfected cells can be proliferated using tissue culture techniques appropriate to the cell type. The present invention thus provides a method of producing the antibody of the invention or antigen-binding fragment thereof, wherein said method comprises the step of culturing a host cell comprising a nucleic acid or a vector encoding the antibody of the invention or antigen-binding fragment thereof, whereby said antibody of the disclosure or a fragment thereof is expressed.
In one aspect, the present invention relates to a method of producing the multispecific antibody of the invention or a binding domain thereof or a fragment thereof, the method comprising the step of culturing a host cell expressing a nucleic acid encoding the multispecific antibody of the invention or a binding domain thereof or a fragment thereof.
In a further aspect, the present invention relates to a pharmaceutical composition comprising the multispecific antibody of the invention, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Pharmaceutically acceptable carriers enhance or stabilize the composition, or facilitate preparation of the composition. Pharmaceutically acceptable carriers include solvents, dispersion media, coatings, antibacterial and antifungal agents, isotonic and absorption delaying agents, and the like that are physiologically compatible.
A pharmaceutical composition of the invention can be administered by a variety of methods known in the art. The route and/or mode of administration vary depending upon the desired results. Administration can be intravenous, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, or subcutaneous, or administered proximal to the site of the target. The pharmaceutically acceptable carrier should be suitable for intravenous, intramuscular, subcutaneous, parenteral, spinal or epidermal administration (e.g., by injection or infusion). Depending on the route of administration, the active compound, i.e., the multispecific antibody of the invention, may be coated in a material to protect the compound from the action of acids and other natural conditions that may inactivate the compound.
Pharmaceutical compositions of the invention can be prepared in accordance with methods well known and routinely practiced in the art. See, e.g., Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, Mack Publishing Co., 20th ed., 2000; and Sustained and Controlled Release Drug Delivery Systems, J. R. Robinson, ed., Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1978. Pharmaceutical compositions are preferably manufactured under GMP conditions. Typically, a therapeutically effective dose or efficacious dose of the multispecific antibody of the invention is employed in the pharmaceutical compositions of the invention. The multispecific antibodies of the invention are formulated into pharmaceutically acceptable dosage forms by conventional methods known to those of skill in the art. Dosage regimens are adjusted to provide the optimum desired response (e.g., a therapeutic response). For example, a single bolus may be administered, several divided doses may be administered over time or the dose may be proportionally reduced or increased as indicated by the exigencies of the therapeutic situation. It is especially advantageous to formulate parenteral compositions in dosage unit form for ease of administration and uniformity of dosage. Dosage unit form as used herein refers to physically discrete units suited as unitary dosages for the subjects to be treated; each unit contains a predetermined quantity of active compound calculated to produce the desired therapeutic effect in association with the required pharmaceutical carrier.
Actual dosage levels of the active ingredients in the pharmaceutical compositions of the invention can be varied so as to obtain an amount of the active ingredient which is effective to achieve the desired therapeutic response for a particular patient, composition, and mode of administration, without being toxic to the patient. The selected dosage level depends upon a variety of pharmacokinetic factors including the activity of the particular compositions of the present invention employed, or the ester, salt or amide thereof, the route of administration, the time of administration, the rate of excretion of the particular compound being employed, the duration of the treatment, other drugs, compounds and/or materials used in combination with the particular compositions employed, the age, sex, weight, condition, general health and prior medical history of the patient being treated, and like factors.
The multispecific antibody of the invention is usually administered on multiple occasions. Intervals between single dosages can be weekly, monthly or yearly. Intervals can also be irregular as indicated by measuring blood levels of the multispecific antibody of the invention in the patient. Alternatively, the multispecific antibody of the invention can be administered as a sustained release formulation, in which case less frequent administration is required. Dosage and frequency vary depending on the half-life of the antibody in the patient. In general, humanized antibodies show longer half-life than that of chimeric antibodies and nonhuman antibodies. The dosage and frequency of administration can vary depending on whether the treatment is prophylactic or therapeutic. In prophylactic applications, a relatively low dosage is administered at relatively infrequent intervals over a long period of time. Some patients continue to receive treatment for the rest of their lives. In therapeutic applications, a relatively high dosage at relatively short intervals is sometimes required until progression of the disease is reduced or terminated, and preferably until the patient shows partial or complete amelioration of symptoms of disease. Thereafter, the patient can be administered a prophylactic regime.
In one aspect, the present invention relates to the multispecific antibody of the invention or the pharmaceutical composition of the invention for use as a medicament. In a suitable embodiment, the present invention provides the multispecific antibody or the pharmaceutical composition for use in treatment of a proliferative disease, in particular a cancer in a subject in need thereof.
In another aspect, the present invention provides the multispecific antibody or the pharmaceutical composition for use in a manufacture of a medicament for treatment of a proliferative disease, in particular a cancer.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to use of the multispecific antibody or the pharmaceutical composition for treating a proliferative disease, in particular a cancer in a subject in need thereof.
In a further aspect, the present invention relates to use of the multispecific antibody or the pharmaceutical composition in the manufacture of a medicament for treatment of a proliferative disease, in particular a cancer, in a subject in need thereof.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to a method of treating a subject comprising administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of the multispecific antibody of the present invention. In a suitable embodiment, the present invention relates to a method of treating a proliferative disease, in particular a cancer in a subject comprising administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of the multispecific antibody of the present invention.
The term “subject” includes human and non-human animals. Non-human animals include all vertebrates, e.g., mammals and non-mammals, such as non-human primates, sheep, dog, cow, chickens, amphibians, and reptiles. Except when noted, the terms “patient” or “subject” are used herein interchangeably.
The terms “treatment”, “treating”, “treat”, “treated”, and the like, as used herein, refer to obtaining a desired pharmacologic and/or physiologic effect. The effect may be therapeutic in terms of a partial or complete cure for a disease and/or adverse effect attributable to the disease or delaying the disease progression. “Treatment”, as used herein, covers any treatment of a disease in a mammal, e.g., in a human, and includes: (a) inhibiting the disease, i.e., arresting its development; and (b) relieving the disease, i.e., causing regression of the disease.
The term “therapeutically effective amount” or “efficacious amount” refers to the amount of an agent that, when administered to a mammal or other subject for treating a disease, is sufficient to effect such treatment for the disease. The “therapeutically effective amount” will vary depending on the agent, the disease and its severity and the age, weight, etc., of the subject to be treated.
In one embodiment, the proliferative disease is a cancer. The term “cancer” refers to a disease characterized by the rapid and uncontrolled growth of aberrant cells. Cancer cells can spread locally or through the bloodstream and lymphatic system to other parts of the body. The terms “tumor” and “cancer” are used interchangeably herein, e.g., both terms encompass solid and liquid, e.g., diffuse or circulating, tumors. As used herein, the term “cancer” or “tumor” includes premalignant, as well as malignant cancers and tumors. The term “cancer” is used herein to mean a broad spectrum of tumors, including all solid and haematological malignancies. Examples of such tumors include, but are not limited to: a benign or especially malignant tumor, solid tumors, brain cancer, kidney cancer, liver cancer, adrenal gland cancer, bladder cancer, breast cancer, stomach cancer (e.g., gastric tumors), oesophageal cancer, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, colon cancer, rectum cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, lung cancer (e.g. non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer), vaginal cancer, thyroid cancer, melanoma (e.g., unresectable or metastatic melanoma), renal cell carcinoma, sarcoma, glioblastoma, multiple myeloma or gastrointestinal cancer, especially colon carcinoma or colorectal adenoma, a tumor of the neck and head, endometrial cancer, Cowden syndrome, Lhermitte-Duclos disease, Bannayan-Zonana syndrome, prostate hyperplasia, a neoplasia, especially of epithelial character, preferably mammary carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia (e.g., Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (e.g., Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, plasma cell myeloma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, a leukemia, and any combination thereof. In a preferred embodiment, the cancer is a lung cancer, preferably non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In another embodiment, said cancer is a colorectal cancer.
The multispecific antibody of the present invention, or the composition of the present invention, inhibits the growth of solid tumors, but also liquid tumors. In a further embodiment, the proliferative disease is a solid tumor. The term “solid tumor” especially means a breast cancer, ovarian cancer, colon cancer, rectum cancer, prostate cancer, stomach cancer (especially gastric cancer), cervical cancer, lung cancer (e.g., non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer), and a tumor of the head and neck. Further, depending on the tumor type and the particular combination used, a decrease of the tumor volume can be obtained. The multispecific antibody of the present invention, or the composition of the present invention, is also suited to prevent the metastatic spread of tumors and the growth or development of micrometastases in a subject having a cancer.
In one embodiment, said cancer is PD-L1-positive, preferably wherein said cancer expresses high levels of PD-L1 in comparison to a healthy tissue, in particular wherein said cancer expresses PD-L1 (mRNA or protein) at least 2 times, at least 3 times, at least 4 times, at least 5 times, at least 6 times, at least 7 times, at least 8 times, at least 9 times, at least 10 times, at least 15 times, at least 20 times, at least 30 times, at least 40 times, at least 50 times, at least 60 times, at least 70 times, at least 80 times, at least 90 times, at least 100 times higher level in comparison to PD-L1 expression (mRNA or protein respectively) in a healthy tissue. In some embodiments, said cancer is malignant. In some embodiments, said cancer is benign. In some embodiments, said cancer is primary. In some embodiments, said cancer is secondary. In one embodiment, said cancer is lung cancer, preferably non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In another embodiment, said cancer is colorectal cancer.
In one aspect, the present invention relates to a kit comprising the multispecific antibody of the invention or the pharmaceutical composition of the invention. The kit can include one or more other elements including: instructions for use; other reagents, e.g., a label, a therapeutic agent, or an agent useful for chelating, or otherwise coupling, an antibody to a label or therapeutic agent, or a radioprotective composition; devices or other materials for preparing the antibody molecule for administration; pharmaceutically acceptable carriers; and devices or other materials for administration to a subject. In a specific embodiment, the kit comprises the multispecific antibody of the invention in a pharmaceutically effective amount. In a further embodiment, the kit comprises a pharmaceutically effective amount of the multispecific antibody of the invention in lyophilized form and a diluent and, optionally, instructions for use. Said kit may further comprise a filter needle for reconstitution and a needle for injecting
R
P
FGT
Throughout the text of this application, should there be a discrepancy between the text of the specification (e.g., Tables 1 to 6) and the sequence listing, the text of the specification shall prevail.
It is appreciated that certain features of the invention, which are, for clarity, described in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the invention, which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable sub-combination. All combinations of the embodiments pertaining to the invention are specifically embraced by the present invention and are disclosed herein just as if each and every combination was individually and explicitly disclosed. In addition, all sub-combinations of the various embodiments and elements thereof are also specifically embraced by the present invention and are disclosed herein just as if each and every such sub-combination was individually and explicitly disclosed herein.
The present invention is not to be limited in scope by the specific embodiments described herein. Indeed, various modifications of the invention in addition to those described herein will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
To the extent possible under the respective patent law, all patents, applications, publications, test methods, literature, and other materials cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference.
The following Examples illustrates the invention described above, but is not, however, intended to limit the scope of the invention in any way. Other test models known as such to the person skilled in the pertinent art can also determine the beneficial effects of the claimed invention.
The goal of the project is to identify a low affinity anti-PD-L1 antibody fragment that neutralizes the interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1. Ultimately, this domain will be combined in a multispecific molecule with a high affinity domain against a selected tumor associated antigen (TAA) coexpressed with PD-L1 on tumor cells, allowing the targeting and neutralization of PD-L1 specifically on those cancer cells. Two groups of long acting molecules, corresponding to two projects, were designed. Each group of molecules is mainly differing in the number of specificities (3 or 4) as well as in their format. Both groups of molecules contain a Her2 domain as TAA, a low affinity PD-L1 domain and a human serum albumin binding domain for half-life extension, but one group contains in addition an anti-CD3E binding domain in order to trigger T cell activation. This example describes the production and characterization of the low affinity domains as well as of the multispecific molecules that were designed in these projects.
Design and Production of scFv
In order to generate a low affinity PD-L1 antibody that neutralizes the interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1, single alanine substitutions were introduced in the CDR regions of a high affinity neutralizing anti-PD-L1 domain previously identified, clone 33-03-G02. As a first step each amino acid of the CDR3 region (highest amino acid variability) of the high affinity domain were mutated to alanine resulting in 21 mutants. In comparison to the original domain, the affinity to PD-L1 was reduced by more than 100-fold for three single mutants. Therefore, single mutations were combined go generate two double mutants. In parallel, nine additional single mutants of the most variable residues of the CDR1 and CDR2 regions were designed as well as two mutants containing combination of other single mutations of the CD3 region which only slightly reduced the affinity of the parental domain but are presumably exposed residues. Furthermore, three mutants containing up to three alanine substitutions of predicted exposed residues were expressed in addition. Data obtained for the five most interesting molecules with a 100-fold to 6′500-fold reduced affinity are presented below.
scFv Production
Heterologous expression of the proteins was performed in E. coli as insoluble inclusion bodies by induced overnight expression in small scale (as indicated in Table 8 below). Inclusion bodies were isolated from the homogenized cell pellet by a centrifugation protocol that included several washing steps to remove cell debris and other host cell impurities. The purified inclusion bodies were solubilized in a denaturing buffer and the scFvs were refolded by a scalable refolding protocol that generated milligram amounts of natively folded, monomeric scFv. At this point a standardized protocol was employed to purify the scFvs. The product after refolding was captured by an affinity chromatography to yield the purified scFvs. Table 8 summarizes manufacture of scFv molecules. Expression of mammalian constructs was performed in CHO-S cells using CHOgro transient transfection kit (Mirus) (see in Table 8). Cultures were harvested after 5-7 days (cell viability <70%) of expression at 37° C. by centrifugation and proteins were purified from clarified culture supernatants by Protein L affinity chromatography followed, if needed, by a polishing step by size-exclusion chromatography. For the quality control of the manufactured material standard analytical methods, such as SE-HPLC, UV280 and SDS-PAGE were used.
Compatibility of the top performing scFv molecules was assessed with respect to freeze-thawing (F/T) cycles (colloidal stability). For the F/T stability assessment the same analytical methods (SE-HPLC, UV absorbance at 280 nm) and parameters as for the storage stability study were applied to monitor the quality of the molecules over multiple F/T cycles. As no dedicated freeze-thaw study was performed, freeze-thaw data was extracted from −80° C. samples of storage stability study which was acquired over 28 days (up to 7 d storage in between F/T cycles).
The midpoint of transition for the thermal unfolding of the scFv constructs was determined by Differential Scanning Fluorimetry using the fluorescence dye SYPRO® Orange. Samples were prepared at a final protein concentration of 50 μg/mL in final buffer (50 mM NaCiP, 150 mM NaCl, pH6.4) containing a final concentration of 5×SYPRO® Orange in a total volume of 100 μl. Twenty-five microliters of prepared samples were added in triplicate to white-walled AB gene PCR plates. The assay was performed in a qPCR machine used as a thermal cycler, and the fluorescence emission was detected using the software's custom dye calibration routine. The PCR plate containing the test samples was subjected to a temperature ramp from 25° C. to 96° C. in increments of 1° C. with 30 s pauses after each temperature increment. The total assay time was about two hours. The Tm was calculated by the software GraphPad Prism using a mathematical second derivative method to calculate the inflection point of the curve. The reported Tm is an average of three measurements.
Affinity to PD-L1 was determined by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) measurements using a Biacore T200 device (GE Healthcare). All measurements were performed at 25° C. In this experiment, Fc-tagged human PD-L1 extracellular domain (ECD, SinoBiological, cat. 10084-H02H) was captured using the Human Antibody Capture kit from GE Healthcare (cat. BR-1008-39). After each analyte injection cycle, the anti-human Fc-specific IgG was regenerated, and new antigen was captured. For affinity determination, the scFvs were injected as analyte using a dose response multi-cycle kinetic assay with concentrations of the analyte ranging from 6.86 to 5000 nM (three-fold dilutions steps) diluted in running buffer (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05% Tween 20, pH 7.4). Association and dissociation time were set to 300 s and 720 s, respectively. The apparent dissociation (kd) and association (ka) rate constants and the apparent dissociation equilibrium constant (KD) were calculated with the Biacore analysis software (BIAevaluation, GE Healthcare) using one-to-one Langmuir binding model and quality of the fits was monitored based on Chi2 and U-value, which is a measure for the quality of the curve fitting. In addition to the kinetic measurement, the value of the KD was obtained by fitting a plot of response at equilibrium against the concentration (steady-state affinity measurement).
As shown in Table 9, binding to human PD-L1 was confirmed for the humanized scFvs tested. Affinity to PD-L1 was reduced by 6,500-fold for PRO1434 compared to the parental scFv PRO830.
CHO-K1 (control cells that do not express PD-L1) and CHO-PD-L1 (Amsbio) with a high PD-L1 expression level were harvested and cell number was determined. Cell suspensions were centrifuged for 5 min at 400×g and 100 μl of cell suspensions (10′000 cells) diluted in PBS-EB (1×DPBS, 2% BCS H.I., 2 mM EDTA) were added to designated wells in a non-binding plate. After three washing steps with PBS-EB, cells were centrifuged and washing buffer was aspirated. 100 μl of the serial dilutions of samples to be tested as well as the positive control were then directly added to the plate. Positive control samples (PRO830, 33-03-G02) were diluted in PBS-EB with concentrations ranging from 3500 to 0.22 ng/ml and samples dilutions ranged from 1000 to 0.064 μg/ml. After incubation at 4° C. for 1 h, plates were washed three times using 100 μl of PBS-EB. Cell pellets were re-suspended with 100 μl Protein L-APC at a concentration of 2 μg/ml and incubated for 1 h at 4° C. Next, cells were washed again three times using 100 μl of PBS-EB. The cell pellets were re-suspended with 50 μl PBS-EB and analyzed with NovoCyte 2060 flow cytometer device. Fluorescence intensity of APC for 5′000 events was recorded for each sample and the geometric mean of fluorescence intensity MFI was calculated. The data were corrected for unspecific antibody binding (blank and CHO-K1 cell binding).
Potency to bind cells expressing PD-L1 was assessed using flow cytometry as described above. Serial dilutions of the respective molecules to be tested as well as the reference PRO830, were added to the plates. Individual IC50 values on each plate were calibrated against the IC50 of the reference molecule PRO830 (high affinity PD-L1 domain) that was taken along on each plate (relative EC50:EC50, PRO830/IC50, test scFv). Potencies are summarized in Table 10 which shows that PRO1434 and PRO1494 have the weakest binding. Dose-response curves obtained for PRO1434 and PRO1494 are presented in
The ability of the scFvs to neutralize the PD-L1/PD-1 interaction when both interacting molecules were expressed on the cell surface was tested using CHO/PD-L1/TCR (T cell receptor) activator and Jurkat/PD-1 cells. In this assay, CHO cells stably expressing PD-L1 and a TCR activator are incubated with Jurkat T cells stably expressing PD-1 and as a reporter gene to monitor T cell activation, firefly luciferase under the control of the NFAT response elements. Upon binding of the TCR activator on CHO cells to the Jurkat T cells, TCR signaling triggers NFAT-induced expression of firefly luciferase. The interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1 however negatively regulates such TCR signaling and thus diminishes firefly luciferase expression. Therefore, blockade of the PD-L1/PD-1 interaction in this system restores luciferase activity.
35′000 CHO/PDL1/TCR activator cells in 100 μl of cell culture medium (DMEM/F12, 10% FCS) were added to the inner wells of a white cell culture plate and incubated for 16-20 h at 37° C. and 5% CO2. Next day, cell culture medium was removed from each well and 50 μl of 2-fold concentrated serial dilutions of the respective molecules to be tested (final concentrations from 162 to 0.025 μg/ml) and the reference molecule avelumab (final concentrations from 3′000 to 0.46 ng/ml) were added. Then, 50 μl of effector Jurkat cells diluted at 400′000 cell/ml in assay buffer (RPM11640 with 10% FCS) were added to each well and plates were incubated for 6 h at 37° C. and 5% CO2. Finally, 50 μL luciferase substrate (BPS Bioscience) prepared according to manufacturer's protocol, was added per well and plates were incubated for 30 min in the dark, luminescence was measured using Flexstation III multi-mode microplate reader.
Potency to neutralize PD-L1 binding to PD-1 was assessed in the cell-based reporter gene assay as described above. Serial dilutions of the respective molecules to be tested as well as the reference avelumab, were added to the plates. Individual IC50 values on each plate were calibrated against the IC50 of the reference molecule avelumab (high affinity PD-L1 domain) that was taken along on each plate (relative IC50: IC50, avelumab/IC50, test scFv). Potencies are summarized in Table 11 which shows that PRO1434 and PRO1494 have the lowest potencies. Titration curves obtained for PRO1434 and PRO1494 are presented
Humanized scFvs were subjected to stability studies such as a four-week stability study, in which the scFvs were formulated in an aqueous buffer (final buffer, 50 mM NaCiP, 150 mM NaCl, pH 6.4) at 10 mg/ml and stored at −80° C., 4° C. and 40° C. for four weeks. At the minimum, protein concentration by measurement of UV absorbance at 280 nm was measured and the fraction of monomers and oligomers in the formulation were evaluated by integration of SE-HPLC peak areas after one week, two weeks and at the end of each study. Parameters, such as % monomer content, % monomer loss, content and % content loss were recorded over time.
Table 12 and 13 compare d0, d7, d14 and endpoint measurements obtained at d28 of the study at 4° C. and 40° C. At 4° C. all molecules show less than 10% loss of monomeric content over 28 days except PRO1075 and PRO1076. At 40° C. only two molecules showed a monomeric content above 85% after 28 days, PRO1434 (86%) and PRO1494 (90%).
This approach is directed at a next generation multi-specific immuno-oncology program targeting HER2-expressing malignant tumors. HER2 is a clinically validated target in several cancer types with unmet medical need, most prominently breast and gastric cancer. However, the spectrum of tumors (over-) expressing HER2 is much broader but—for mechanistic reasons—not accessible to conventional antibodies like trastuzumab while amenable for the present approach, which is designed to not only effectively mediate T cell-induced lysis of HER2-expressing tumors but at the same time to avoid tumor immune-escape by concomitant blockade of immune-suppressive PD-L1 signaling. The local restriction of the two additive, likely simultaneously acting mechanisms of action to tumor tissue, is expected to provide compounds in accordance with the present approach a substantially expanded efficacy profile with anticipated clinical efficacy even in HER2 expressing tumors primarily or secondarily refractory to standard anti-HER2 therapies. The present approach should lead to i) at least as potent, and more selective blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction than avelumab/Bavencio®. Specifically, compounds in accordance with the present approach should efficiently block PD-1 binding to PD-L1 on HER2/PD-L1 co-expressing target cells, while blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction on cells not expressing Her2 should be much less potent than with avelumab/Bavencio®, ii) at least as potent and more selective lysis of HER2/PD-L1 co-expressing cells by peripheral blood mononuclear cells, when compared to trastuzumab/Herceptin®, avelumab/Bavencio® and the combination of the two. More specifically, compounds in accordance with the present approach should potently lyse cells co-expressing HER2 and PD-L1 while no lysis of cells expressing PD-L1 only should occur.
A description of the different formats (Tribody, DVD-Tribody and MATCH-4) designed within the present approach is presented in
indicates data missing or illegible when filed
Expression of Tribodies, DVD-Tribodies and MATCH-4 constructs was performed in CHO-S cells using CHOgro transient transfection kit (Mirus). Cultures were harvested after 5-7 days (cell viability <70%) of expression at 37° C. by centrifugation and proteins were purified from clarified culture supernatants by Protein L affinity chromatography followed, if needed, by a polishing step by size-exclusion chromatography. For the quality control of the manufactured material standard analytical methods, such as SE-HPLC, UV280 and SDS-PAGE were used.
Affinity to PD-L1 was determined by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) measurements using a Biacore T200 device (GE Healthcare) as described above. The apparent dissociation (kd) and association (ka) rate constants and the apparent dissociation equilibrium constant (KD) were calculated with the Biacore analysis software (BIAevaluation, GE Healthcare) using one-to-one Langmuir binding model. The quality of the fits was monitored based on Chi2 and U-value. In addition to the kinetic measurement, the value of the KD was obtained by fitting a plot of response at equilibrium against the concentration (steady-state affinity measurement).
Binding affinities of multi-specific constructs towards recombinant human CD3E ECD (SinoBiological, cat. 10977-H08H), recombinant human IL-23R (custom-made by Trenzyme) and recombinant human Her2 ECD (SinoBiological, cat. 10004-HCCH) were measured by SPR using a Biacore T200 instrument. All measurements were performed at 25° C. The different proteins were immobilized on a sensor chip (CM5 sensor chip, GE healthcare) by amine-coupling to reach an immobilization level of approximately 100 response units (RUs). Serial dilutions of the multi-specific molecules ranging from 0.35 to 90 nM (two-fold dilutions steps) in running buffer were injected into the flow cells at a flow rate of 30-50 μl/min for 5-7 min. Dissociation of the multispecific constructs from the CD3s, IL-23R and Her2 on the CM5 chip was allowed to proceed for 12 min. After each injection cycle, surfaces were regenerated with one injection of 10 mM glycine HCl, pH 2. Obtained binding curves were double-referenced (empty reference channel and zero analyte injection) and the values of kd, ka and KD were calculated with the Biacore analysis software using one-to-one Langmuir binding model and quality of the fits was monitored based on Chi2 and U-value. Since the fits using the one-to-one Langmuir binding model showed suboptimal quality of curve fitting for CD3s, the KD was in addition calculated using a two-state reaction model. This model describes a 1:1 binding of analyte to immobilized ligand followed by a conformational change that stabilizes the complex.
Affinity of molecules to human serum albumin (HSA) and mouse serum albumin (MSA) was determined by SPR measurements using a Biacore T200 device (GE Healthcare). SA was directly coupled to a CM5 sensor chip (GE Healthcare) using amine coupling chemistry. After performing a regeneration scouting and surface performance test to find best assay conditions, a dose response of the molecules of interest with concentrations ranging from 0.7 to 180 nM was tested. The assay was run in a PBS-Tween buffer at pH 5.5. Association and dissociation time were set to 180 s and 720 s, respectively. Obtained binding curves were double-referenced (empty reference channel and zero analyte injection) and fitted using BiaEvaluation software (GE Healthcare) and the 1:1 Langmuir binding model. Retrieved kinetic parameters were used to calculate the apparent dissociation equilibrium constant (KD).
As shown in Table 15 and Table 16, binding to CD3s, human and mouse serum albumin was similar for all molecules tested, and molecules containing the anti-IL23R domain showed comparable affinities to IL23R. Affinity determination by SPR of low affinity domains is very difficult due to the high amount of protein that has to be injected in order to cover the concentration range corresponding to the affinity of the molecules. Therefore, a reliable measurement of the affinity to PD-L1 could not be obtained for some molecules. In addition, in case of low affinity domains steady state analysis of the SPR measurement might be more adequate due to the high bulk shifts observed, which introduce artefacts in the kinetic analysis. Affinity measurement for human PD-L1 was valid for only one Tribody, PRO1498. For the MATCH-4 molecules, valid measurements were obtained using the steady state analysis. The lowest affinities to PD-L1 were around 900 nM for PRO1544, PRO1545 and PRO1547. PRO1543 and PRO1546 showed similar affinities around 300 nM. MATCH-4 proteins carrying the lambda capped trastuzumab G100C/G172C mutant anti-Her2 domain (PRO1543, PRO1544, PRO1557 and PRO1558) showed similar affinities to Her2 (300 to 400 pM), which again is comparable to the affinities of trastuzumab anti-Her2 domain incorporated in Tribody (PRO1497) and DVD-Tribody (PRO1547 and PRO1548).
# Maximum binding level achieved normalized to theoretical Rmax
These assays were conducted to assess the ability of the multi-specific low affinity PD-L1x/Her2 constructs to neutralize the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 expressed on HCC1954 cells, which also express Her2. Specifically, the molecules should efficiently block PD-1 binding to PD-L1 on Her2/PD-L1 co-expressing target cells (HCC1954), while blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction on cells not expressing Her2 (HCC827) should be much less potent than with avelumab/Bavencio© or nivolumab/Opdivo©. Blockade of PD-1 binding to the cells was analyzed by FC and compared to the reference IgG avelumab. Moreover, HCC827 cells were used as an additional control as these cells express PD-L1 at comparable levels than HCC1954 cells but lack significant expression of Her2.
HCC1954 and HCC827 cells were stimulated with 10 ng/ml human IFNγ for 24 h to further induce the expression of PD-L1. Next day, HCC827 and HCC1954 cells were detached, centrifuged for 4 min with 200 g, re-suspended in PBS/2% FCS/2 mM EDTA (staining buffer) and seeded into 96 well PP microplates (50 μl/well). Dilution series of three-fold steps of the multi-specific molecules and of avelumab starting at 20 μg/ml and 5 μg/ml, respectively, were prepared in staining buffer containing 500 ng/ml biotinylated PD 1. Plates of HCC827 and HCC1954 were centrifuged for 4 min with 200 g and the dilution series were added to the cells (100 μl/well) and incubated for 30 min at RT. Next, plates were washed once with 150 μl staining buffer and Streptavidin-PE solution was added to the cells (100 μl/well) and incubated for 30 min at 4° C. As a next step, cells were washed again as indicated above and then cells were re-suspended in 100 μl of staining buffer. Re-suspended cells were then processed for fluorescence measurement using NovoCyte flow cytometer (ACEA Bioscience Inc.). Mean fluorescence intensity of PE-labeled PD-1 was reported and data were fitted using sigmoidal 4PL fit (GraphPad Prism). Individual IC50 values on each plate were calibrated against the IC50 of the reference molecule avelumab that was taken along on each plate (relative IC50:IC50, avelumab/IC50, test molecule). In addition, the ratio between the relative IC50 values found on high Her2 expressing HCC1954 and low Her2 expressing HCC827 cells was calculated.
Obtained potencies of constructs according to the present approach to neutralize PD-1/PD-L1 interaction are summarized in Table 17. On HCC1954 cells expressing high levels of Her2 and PD-L1, the Tribody PRO1454 carrying the single alanine mutant PD-L1 domain (33-03-G02 G109A) showed a similar potency as avelumab whereas on cells expressing only PD-L1 (HCC827) the potency of PRO1454 was 14-fold lower. The Tribody PRO1497 carrying the double alanine mutant 33-03-G02 Q108A/G109A neutralized PD-1/PD-L1 interaction on Her2/PD-L1 positive cells (HCC1954) almost as efficient as PRO1454 as shown by similar relative IC50 values (PRO1454: 0.66, PRO1497: 0.38). However, in contrast to PRO1454, PRO1497 demonstrated only very weak neutralization potency on PD-L1 expressing cells (HCC827) (
All MATCH-4 molecules containing trastuzumab anti-Her2 domain and the anti-PD-L1 domain carrying both mutations (Q108A/G109A) had similar potencies (rel. IC50 values, PRO1543: 0.28, PRO1544: 0.24) when compared to the Tribody PRO1497. Titration curves obtained for PRO1543 and PRO1546 are presented in
T-cell activation was tested in an NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T-cells) assay to assess simultaneous effects of the molecules on CD3 cross-linking and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Specifically, the molecules should efficiently induce CD3 activation and block PD-1 binding to PD-L1 on HER2/PD-L1 co-expressing target cells (HCC1954), while CD3 activation and blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction on cells not expressing Her2 (CHO-PD-L1) should be much less potent. The Jurkat PD-1 NFAT reporter T cell line expresses the luciferase reporter gene under control of the NFAT response elements from the IL-2 promoter. The transcription factor NFAT is activated upon cross-linking of CD3e and induces a number of genes involved in T cell activation. In this system, cross-linking of CD36 induces expression of the luciferase reporter gene. In addition, the interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1 negatively regulates such CD3e signaling and thus diminishes firefly luciferase expression. Therefore, blockade of the PD-L1/PD-1 interaction in this system leads to increased luciferase activity. HCC1954 cells stimulated for 24 h with 10 ng/ml IFNy to increase PD-L1 expression and PD-L1 expressing CHO-K1 cells (clone A2) were used as target cells and seeded at 25′000 cells per well in 50 μl on 96-well culture plates. Serial dilutions of the molecules to be tested were prepared in assay medium containing 50 mg/ml HSA and 25 μl were added to the cells (final concentrations range from 250 nM to 0.026 pM). PD-1 expressing Jurkat NFAT reporter cells were prepared in assay medium containing HSA at 50 mg/ml and added at a cell density of 50′000 cells per well. Luciferase expression was detected by addition of Luciferase reagent and was read by a luminescence reader 5 or 22 h after addition of Jurkat PD-1 NFAT reporter cells. Relative luminescence units (RLU) are presented. Potency of PRO1497 which is a HER2×PD-L1high KD×CD3 scDb-scFv was used as a reference for calculation of the relative potency of the extended half-life molecules.
Potency to trigger CD3 activation and PD-L1/PD-1 interaction blockade concomitantly was assessed by NFAT reporter gene assay and the results are presented in Table 18. Serial dilutions of the respective molecules to be tested as well as the reference scDb-scFv Her2×CD3×PD-L1low affinity (PRO1497) were added to the plates. Individual IC50 values and maximal activation were normalized to the IC50 and maximal activation of the reference molecule PRO1497 in presence of Her2 and PD-L1 expressing cells HCC1954 (relative IC50 or Max. act.: IC50 or Max. Act., PRO1497 on HCC1954/IC50 or Max act., test molecule). In the presence of PD-1/Her2 expressing cells (HCC1954), Tribodies PRO1454, PRO1497 and PRO1456 activated CD3 signaling in Jurkat cells with similar EC50 but the maximal activation was higher for PRO1454 and PRO1497, i.e. for molecules carrying the low affinity anti-PD-L1 domain, compared to PRO1456 containing an anti-IL-23R dummy domain instead of the anti-PD-L1 domain (
$Max. activation, PRO1497 on HCC1954 (RLU)/Max. activation, test molecule (RLU)
$$Max. activation, PRO1454 on HCC1954 (RLU)/Max. activation, test molecule (RLU)
$$$Max. activation, PRO1543 on HCC1954 (RLU)/Max. activation, test molecule (RLU)
To assess the ability of the compounds of the present approach to selectively direct T cells to Her2 and PD-L1 co-expressing cells, a cytotoxicity assay using Her2 and PD-L1 positive cell lines (HCC1954) were performed, in the presence of human PBMCs. Simultaneous binding to both targets by the compounds of the present approach lead to cross-linking of CD38 on T cells and activated a signaling cascade that triggers T cell activation (CD69 upregulation, cytokine secretion) and the release of cytotoxic granules, which ultimately resulted in target cell killing. In contrast to the combination of avelumab/Bavencio© and trastuzumab/Herceptin©, the compounds of the present approach should selectively lyse cells co-expressing PD-L1 and HER2 while no lysis of cells solely expressing PD-L1 (CHO.PD-L1 transfectants) should be observed.
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from fresh blood of healthy volunteers using the lymphocyte separation medium Lymphoprep (Stemcell technologies) according to manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, blood was diluted 1:2 with human PBMC isolation buffer (PBS, 2% FCS, 2 mM EDTA) or cynomolgus PBMCs isolation buffer (PBS, 5% FCS, 2 mM EDTA) and applied to Leucosep tubes containing recommended amount of Lymphoprep medium. LeucoSep tubes were centrifuged 30 min at 800 g (human blood) or 2000 g (cynomolgus blood) without brakes at RT. Then, the cell layer containing PBMCs was collected and washed twice with human PBMCs isolation buffer and red blood cells were lysed using red blood cells lysis buffer for 5 min at RT. Isolated human cells were then washed once with their respective isolation buffer and once with assay medium (RPMI-1640, 10% FCS). After platelet removal, isolated PBMCs were resuspended in assay medium at a density of 3×106 viable cells per ml.
Two cell lines were used as target cells, HCC1954 (co-expressing high levels of HER2 and PD-L1) and HCC827 cells (co-expressing low levels of HER2 and PD-L1) stimulated for 24 h with 10 ng/ml IFNy to increase PD-L1 expression as well as CHO-PD-L1 (no Her2 and high PD-L1) and CHO-K1 cell line used as negative control cell line. 5′000 viable target cells previously labelled with PKH67 and diluted in 75 μl of assay medium (RPMI-1640, 10% FCS) were added to 96-well plates. 25 μl of 6 times concentrated test proteins diluted in assay medium were added to appropriate wells. 150′000 viable effector cells (PBMCs) diluted in 50 μl assay medium were added to each well (E:T ratio of 30:1) and plates were mixed on a nutating mixer at RT prior to their incubation at 37° C., 5% C02. After 16 h or 40 h, cells were trypsinized, resuspended in staining buffer (PBS, 2% BCS, 2 mM EDTA) and transferred into non-binding plates.
Cells were stained for different markers such as CD69, CD8, CD4, CD11c and Annexin-V. For analysis, the focus was on apoptotic and dead target cells and activated CD8+ T cells. Thereby, target cells were identified by green fluorescence (PKH67) and their viability was analyzed by Annexin-V APC. Effector cells (CD8+ cells) were identified by detecting CD8 on their surface (anti-CD8 PerCP-Cy5.5). Activation of CD8+ T cells was finally detected by quantification of CD69 expression (anti-CD69 PE). CD4 was used to better discriminate CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. CD11c was used to stain monocytes and dendritic cells. For each marker except Annexin-V antibodies were incubated 30 min at RT under gentle agitation. Cells were washed once with staining buffer, once with Annexin binding buffer and Annexin-V staining was carried on for 30 min at RT under agitation. Cells were washed once with Annexin-V binding buffer and flow cytometry analysis was done on a Novocyte Flow Cytometer.
The percentage of specific target cells lysis was calculated according to the following equation:
The percentage of activated CD8+ T cells corresponds to the proportion of CD69+ CD8+ T cells.
The percentage of viable CD4+, CD8+ T cells and CD11c+ cells correspond to the proportion of Annexin-V negative cells within the different cell populations.
Cytotoxic potential of the selected MATCH-4 molecules PRO1543 and PRO1895 was assessed using the flow cytometry-based cytotoxicity assay. Data obtained are presented in Table 19 and titration curves for PRO1543 and PRO1895 and control molecule PRO2290 are presented in
CD4+ and CD8+ T cell viability was analyzed after 16 and 40 h. This gives a safety read-out as activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are expressing PD-L1 but not Her2 and might be targeted as well by PRO1543. As summarized in Table 21 and illustrated in
Same method as in the example above was used. Four cell lines were used as target cells, HCC1954 (co-expressing high levels of HER2 and PD-L1), HCC1827 (expressing very low levels of HER2 and high levels of PD-L1) stimulated for 24 h with 10 ng/ml IFNy to increase PD-L1 expression, MCF-7 (expressing low levels of HER2 and very low PD-L1 levels) as well as CHO-PD-L1 (no Her2 and high PD-L1, purchased at BPS Bioscience. Please note that this cell line expresses PD-L1 at a about 9 times lower level compared to the CHO-PD-L1 clone A2 cell line used for the experiments shown in Tables 18 and 19,
The results of the cytotoxicity assay are shown in Table 22 and in
The anti-tumor activity of the compounds of the present approach was compared to anti-PD-1 therapy and anti-PD-1 anti-Her2 combined therapy in human HCC1954 ductal breast carcinoma xenografts using the immunodeficient NOG mice strain from Taconic and allogeneic human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Effects of PRO1678 (scMATCH3) and PRO1543 (MATCH4) on tumor volume were compared to treatment with the anti-PD-1 antibody (nivolumab) and the nivolumab/anti Her2 antibody (trastuzumab) combo. An irrelevant IgG palivizumab was used as a control IgG. Animal body weight was followed as well.
Female NOG mice received unilateral injections of 5×106 HCC1954 cells. Cells were injected in a mixture of 50% cell suspension in PBS and 50% Matrigel in a total injection volume of 100 μl. After injection of tumor cells into NOG mice and successful tumor engraftment (median group tumor volume of 80-100 mm3), mice were substituted with 5×106 human PBMCs by intravenous injection. On the day of randomization, four mice of each group were reconstituted with PBMCs of donor A and another four mice with PBMCs of donor B. Treatment will start 1-2 hours after the injection of PBMCs and were applied as follows.
Body weights (Table 24) and tumor volume by caliper measurement (Table 23 and
A description of the MATCH-4 molecules designed within this part of the current approach is shown in
Expression of MATCH4 constructs was performed in CHO-S cells using CHOgro transient transfection kit (Mirus). Cultures were harvested after 5-7 days (cell viability <70%) of expression at 37° C. by centrifugation and proteins were purified from clarified culture supernatants by Protein L affinity chromatography followed, if needed, by a polishing step by size-exclusion chromatography. For the quality control of the manufactured material standard analytical methods, such as SE-HPLC, UV280 and SDS-PAGE were used.
Assessment of the CD137 agonistic effect of anti-Her2×CD137×HSA×PD-L1(low affinity) MATCH4 molecules by using a cell-based assay of transgenic NF-kB Jurkat reporter cell line expressing CD137
In this assay the activation of CD137 signaling in Jurkat cells was assessed. The activity of CD137 signaling is reported by measurement of Luciferase expression which is driven by CD137 induced NF-kB activation in a Jurkat reporter cell line. The expression of Luciferase directly correlates with the activity of CD137. Moreover, clustering of CD137, which is required for activation of the signal pathway, is facilitated via the formation of an immunological synapse between the Jurkat cells and a Her2 expressing cell line. Therefore, Her2 expression is needed for clustering and activation of CD137 on the reporter cell line.
Cancer cell lines HCC1954 (high levels of expression for Her2 and PD-L1) and HCC827 (low levels of expression for Her2 but high levels for PD-L1) were seeded at 25′000 cells per well on 96-well culture plates. Then, seeded cells were either stimulated with 10 ng/ml IFNy for 24 h or left unstimulated. Next, serial dilutions of MATCH4 molecules of interest as well as the internal reference molecules PRO1186 or PRO1430 (both anti-CD137×HSA×PD-L1(high affinity) scMATCH3) were prepared and added to the cells. After addition of molecules of interest, Jurkat reporter cells were prepared in assay medium containing HSA at 25 mg/ml and added at a cell density of 40′000 cells per well. Luciferase expression was detected by addition of Luciferase reagent and was read by a luminescence reader 24 h after addition of Jurkat cells. Data were presented by plotting the relative luminescence units (RLU) of the test samples as a function of test sample concentration and fitted using a sigmoidal 4PL fit (GraphPad Prism).
As shown in
$rel. to PRO1430
$$rel. to PRO1186
These assays were conducted to assess the ability of the multi-specific low affinity PD-L1x/Her2 constructs to neutralize the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 expressed on HCC1954 cells, which also express Her2. Specifically, the molecules should efficiently block PD-1 binding to PD-L1 on HER2/PD-L1 co-expressing target cells (HCC1954), while blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction on cells not expressing Her2 (HCC827) should be much less potent than with avelumab/Bavencio® or nivolumab/Opdivo®. Blockade of PD-1 binding to the cells was analyzed by flow cytometry in presence of human SA as described above. Serial dilutions of the respective molecules to be tested as well as the reference avelumab were added to the plates. Individual IC50 values on each plate were calibrated against the IC50 of the reference molecule avelumab that was taken along on each plate (relative IC50:IC50, avelumab/IC50, test molecule). In addition, the ratio between the relative IC50 values found on high Her2 expressing HCC1954 and low Her2 expressing HCC827 cells was calculated.
Potencies of MATCH4 constructs of the present approach are summarized in Table 27. PD-L1 inhibition curve obtained for PRO1993 is shown in
Design and Production of scDb-scFv:
A description of the different scDb-scFv (scMATCH3) molecules designed within this aspect of the present approach is shown in
Expression of scDb-scFv constructs was performed in CHO-S cells using CHOgro transient transfection kit (Mirus). Cultures were harvested after 5-7 days (cell viability <70%) of expression at 37° C. by centrifugation and proteins were purified from clarified culture supernatants by Protein L affinity chromatography followed, if needed, by a polishing step by size-exclusion chromatography. For the quality control of the manufactured material standard analytical methods, such as SE-HPLC, UV280 and SDS-PAGE were used.
Affinity to human PD-L1, Her2 and human and mouse serum albumin (SA) was determined by SPR using a Biacore T200 device (GE Healthcare) as described above.
Obtained SPR sensorgrams were double-referenced (empty reference channel and zero analyte injection) and fitted using BiaEvaluation software (GE Healthcare) and the 1:1 Langmuir binding model. Quality of the fits was monitored based on Chi2 and U-value (Biacore). Retrieved kinetic parameters were used to calculate the apparent dissociation equilibrium constant (KD). In addition to the kinetic measurement, the value of the KD for the low affinity PD-L1 measurements was obtained by fitting a plot of response at equilibrium against the concentration (steady-state affinity measurement).
As shown in Table 29, binding to Her2 and human SA was similar for all molecules tested. Affinity to PD-L1 could be determined only for the molecules PRO1678 and PRO1679 using the steady state analysis and for both proteins, the affinity found was comparable (KD values, PRO1678: 156 nM, PRO1679: 122 nM).
The assay was conducted to assess the ability of the multi-specific low affinity PD-L1x/Her2 constructs to neutralize the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 expressed on HCC1954 cells, which also express Her2. Specifically, the molecules should efficiently block PD-1 binding to PD-L1 on Her2/PD-L1 co-expressing target cells (HCC1954), while blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction on cells not expressing Her2 (HCC827) should be much less potent than with avelumab/Bavencio® or nivolumab/Opdivo®. Blockade of PD-1 binding to the cells was analyzed by flow cytometry in presence of human SA as described above. Individual IC50 values on each plate were calibrated against the IC50 of the reference molecule avelumab that was taken along on each plate (relative IC50:IC50, avelumab/IC50, test molecule). In addition, the ratio between the relative IC50 values found on high Her2 expressing HCC1954 and low Her2 expressing HCC827 cells was calculated.
Potencies of scMATCH3 constructs of the present approach are summarized in Table 30.
SK-OV3 cells (from ATCC, cat. HTB-77, human ovarian adenocarcinoma cells that express very high levels of HER2 and very low PD-L1 levels), MCF-7 (human breast cancer cells that express low levels of HER2 and very low PD-L1 levels) and CHO PD-L1 (from Amsbio, control cells that express high levels of PD-L1 and do not express human Her2) were harvested and cell number was determined. Cell suspensions were centrifuged for 5 min at 400×g and 100 μl of cell suspensions (50′000 cells) diluted in PBS-EB (1×DPBS, 2% BCS H.I., 2 mM EDTA) were added to designated wells in a non-binding plate. After three washing steps with PBS-EB, cells were centrifuged and washing buffer was aspirated. 100 μl of serial dilutions starting at a concentration of 50 nM of samples to be tested (MATCH4 molecules: anti-HER2 trastuzumab-based PRO1543 and anti-HER2 pertuzumab-based PRO1895) as well as the reference antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab were then directly added to the plate. After incubation at 4° C. for 1 h, plates were washed three times using 100 μl of PBS-EB. Cell pellets incubated with MATCH4 molecules were re-suspended with 100 μl of Numab's framework specific detection antibody which subsequentially was detected by the addition of anti-rabbit IgG antibody labeled with APC at a concentration of 2 μg/ml and incubated for 1 h at 4° C. Cell pellets incubated with reference antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab molecules were re-suspended with 100 μl of anti-human Fc antibody labeled with RPE at a concentration of 5 μg/ml and incubated for 1 h at 4° C.
Next, cells were washed again three times using 100 μl of PBS-EB. The cell pellets were re-suspended with 50 μl PBS-EB and analyzed with NovoCyte 2060 flow cytometer device. Fluorescence intensity of APC and RPE channel for 5,000 events was recorded for each sample and the geometric mean of fluorescence intensity MFI was calculated. The data were single-referenced (subtracted for fluorescence intensity found on cells incubated with buffer and detection antibody only) and obtained concentration-response curves were fitted using a 4-PL fit (GraphPad prism software).
The apparent binding affinity to bind SK-OV3, MCF-7 and CHO PD-L1 was assessed using flow cytometry. Individual EC50 values on each plate were calibrated against the EC50 of the respective reference molecule (i.e. trastuzumab for PRO1543 and pertuzumab for PRO1895). Obtained EC50 and relative EC50 as well as maximum binding in flow cytometry are shown in Table 31. Concentration-response curves are depicted in
As shown in Table 31, MATCH4 molecules bound to SK-OV3 cells expressing high levels of HER2 with an apparent binding affinity comparable to the clinical stage antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab. This result indicates that MATCH4 molecules can catch up with the apparent binding affinity of bivalent anti-HER2 antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab when binding to cells that express high levels of HER2 and PD-L1 (even if the expression is very low) is tested due to avidity effects (binding to HER2 and PD-L1).
On the other hand, the apparent binding affinity of MATCH4 is inferior to the binding affinity of clinical stage antibodies when binding to cells is assessed that express both antigens at very low levels (e.g. MCF-7 cells) caused by the lack of avidity of MATCH4 molecules. Residual binding to CHO PD-L1 cells was found for pertuzumab and pertuzumab-based MATCH4 molecule PRO1895, which contrasts with non-binding of trastuzumab and trastuzumab-based MATCH4 molecule PRO1543. One might speculate that pertuzumab is able to binds to hamster HER2 whereas trastuzumab, which binds to a different epitope, cannot. In any case, these data indicate that the low affinity anti-PD-L1 moiety incorporated in MATCH4 molecules is not able to bind to cells that express PD-L1 only.
Assessment of the apparent affinity of PRO1543 and PRO1895 as well as clinical stage anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab and pertuzumab to bind HCC1954 (high levels of expression for Her2 and PD-L1) and HCC827 (low levels of expression for Her2 but high levels for PD-L1) was done in flow cytometry. HCC827 and HCC1954
cells were stimulated with IFNy for 24 h to further increase PD-L1 expression and were then tested in flow cytometry experiment as described above with the exception the dilution series of proteins started at 150 nM.
Individual EC50 values on each plate were calibrated against the EC50 value of the respective reference molecule (i.e. trastuzumab for PRO1543 and pertuzumab for PRO1895). Obtained EC50 and relative EC50 as well as maximum binding in flow cytometry are shown in Table 32. Concentration-response curves are depicted in
As shown in Table 32, MATCH4 molecules bound to IFNy-stimulated HCC827 cells expressing high levels of PD-L1 and low levels of HER2 with an apparent binding affinity comparable to the clinical stage antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab. On the other hand, the apparent binding affinity of MATCH4 is inferior to the binding affinity of clinical stage antibodies when binding to cells is assessed that express both antigens at high levels (IFNy-stimulated HCC1954 cells).
The ability of MATCH4 molecules to bind to HER2-expressing SK-OV3 cells in presence of saturating concentration of trastuzumab and pertuzumab was assessed by flow cytometry. Instead of testing a serial dilution of trastuzumab and pertuzumab, a high concentration of the antibodies that resulted in saturated binding to SK-OV3 cells (50 nM) was added to the cells prior the addition of MATCH4 molecules. After the incubation of cells with trastuzumab or pertuzumab for 1 h at 4° C., serial dilution of MATCH4 molecules starting at 50 nM were added to the cells.
Plasmamembranous binding of MATCH4 molecules PRO1543 and PRO1895 was then assessed by flow cytometry as described above.
Individual EC50 values on each plate were calibrated against the EC50 value of the respective control (i.e. binding of MATCH4 molecules without the addition of anti-HER2 antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab). Obtained EC50 and relative EC50 as well as maximum binding in flow cytometry are shown in Table 33. Concentration-response curves are depicted in
As shown in Table 33 and in
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19206959.9 | Nov 2019 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2020/080941 | 11/4/2020 | WO |
