The present document pertains to the field of multistage DC-DC converters.
It is often necessary to convert power provided by a voltage source at a first DC voltage into power at a different DC voltage; this is typically done by DC-DC converters. DC-DC converters are commonly used in battery chargers, radios, television receivers, computers, cell phones and other devices. It is desirable that these converters operate with high efficiency. It is also often desirable that these converters be low in cost, since they are often manufactured in very high volumes.
A common DC-DC converter architecture, as illustrate in
Another common DC-DC converter architecture, as illustrated in
Yet another common DC-DC converter architecture, as illustrated in
Buck, boost, and buck-boost converters provide an output power having a ripple component which must be filtered by capacitors 112, 142, 151. In a buck converter as illustrated in
When large output currents are required, it is common to couple multiple DC-DC converter units, such as the buck converter of
It is known that efficiency of parallel DC-DC converter units is enhanced, and ripple reduced, if there is a degree of magnetic coupling between the inductor 106A (representing primary energy storage inductor 106 of a first component buck converter similar to that of
It is also known that perfect coupling between primary energy storage inductors of different phases of paralleled DC-DC converters is undesirable. In various embodiments, these converters may use a transformer formed of coupled inductors having substantial leakage inductance, or a transformer with a separate inductor in series with each winding of the transformer; the term magnetically coupled inductors in this document shall include both configurations.
DC-DC converters having large differences between input and output voltages can potentially have improved efficiency if they include a first-stage converter that converts an input voltage to an intermediate voltage, and a second-stage converter that converts the intermediate voltage to the required output voltage. H. Nakanishi, et al., in A Two-stage Converter with a Coupled-Inductor, 7th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems, 2007, 653-657 (PEDS '07), reported an analysis of a two-stage buck-converter arrangement similar to that illustrated in
A converter as illustrated in
A multiple-output DC-DC converter has at least a first and a second DC-DC sub-converter, each DC-DC subconverter may be a buck, boost, or buck-boost converter having a primary energy-storage inductor. Each DC-DC subconverter drives a separate output of the multiple-output converter and typically has a separate feedback control circuit for controlling output voltage and/or current. The converter has a common timing circuit to maintain a phase offset between the first and second DC-DC subconverters. The primary energy storage inductors of the first and second DC-DC converter are magnetically coupled to raise an effective ripple frequency of the converter and simplify output filtering.
In an alternative embodiment, a multiple-output DC-DC converter has a first subconverter driving an intermediate voltage providing an output of the converter, and providing input to a second subconverter of the multiple output converter.
It has been found that inductors coupled between converters for ripple reduction and efficiency enhancement need not be associated with the same inputs, outputs, or even converters of the same type, for effectiveness at reducing ripple. They do, however, need to operate with appropriately offset timing.
For example, consider the pair of converters illustrated in
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
Since outputs 214, 216 are separate, and may be subject to slightly differing loads, separate feedback control circuits 220, 222 are provided for adjusting on-time of input switch 104 in response to output voltage and/or current changes, 220 for DC-DC converter 206 and 222 for DC-DC converter 210.
In an alternative embodiment, the DC-DC converters 206, 210, are boost converters, in this embodiment the feedback control circuits 220, 222 adjust on-time of switch 134 in response to output voltage and/or current changes.
In a variation of the embodiment of
Another embodiment, as illustrated in
In the embodiment of
Since outputs 264, 266 are separate, and may be subject to differing loads, separate feedback control circuits 270, 272 are provided for adjusting on-time of input switches 104 in response to output voltage and/or current changes, 270 for DC-DC converter 256 and 272 for DC-DC converter 260.
In an alternative embodiment, the DC-DC converters 256, 260, are boost converters, in this embodiment the feedback control circuits 270, 272 adjust on-time of switches 134 in response to output voltage and/or current changes to maintain proper regulation of the output.
Converters 206, 210, 256, 260 may be referred to as subconverters because they form a part of the larger DC-DC conversion system of which they are a part.
It has been estimated that, when operating at full power in both subconverters of
In embodiments similar to those of
Returning to the two stage embodiment of
In an alternative embodiment, resembling that of
Another alternate embodiment, illustrated in
The energy-storage inductor 258 of first converter 256, as well as the energy storage inductor 263 of the phase-A converter 261 and energy storage inductor 383 of the phase-B converter 381, are all magnetically coupled together. As with the embodiments of
Another alternate embodiment, illustrated in
It is known that operation of a buck-type DC-DC converters in discontinuous-conduction mode (DCM) while driving light loads may provide higher efficiency than operation in continuous conduction mode (CCM). With reference to
With reference to
It has also been observed that, in DCM mode with fixed switching frequency, ripple tends to be greater at high load conditions than in low load conditions. Further, sensing output current in buck converters is easily accomplished; in DCM output current is proportional to switching device pulsewidths.
In order to provide high efficiency at low load, while providing the ability to handle heavy loads, converters according to
In order to maximize efficiency while providing optimum ripple reduction, converters according to
In a particular embodiment of a converter according to
In an alternative embodiment, where DCM is sufficient to handle moderate loads, the converter operates according to the following table:
The automatic mode-changing described in the above four paragraphs and tables 1 & 2 is applicable both to embodiments having a feedback controller for each subconverter, and to embodiments having a feedforward controller for one or more subconverters.
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
Intermediate node 566 feeds second-stage DC-DC subconverters 570, 572. A common timing circuit 573 controls timing of controller 564, and feedback controllers 574, 576 of second stage DC-DC subconverters 570, 572 to maintain proper phasing of inductor currents for optimum ripple reduction. Inductor 578 of DC-DC subconverter 570 is magnetically coupled to first-stage inductor 560 through core 580, and inductor 582 of DC-DC subconverter 572 is magnetically coupled to first-stage inductor 562 through core 584.
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
The principles of the present invention are applicable to other converter architectures. For example, a two stage converter having a boost stage and an electrically isolated, push-pull, half-bridge stage is illustrated in
In alternative embodiments, the half-bridge converter 644 of
It has been observed that, in an embodiment similar to that of
It has been found that, where DC-DC converters have a common reference ground as in the embodiment of
In some embodiments, transient suppression capacitors, such as capacitor 219, are added between two, three, or more outputs; such capacitors may be added and can be beneficial in some embodiments resembling those of
Those components illustrated in
Each DC-DC converter, such as DC-DC converters 256, 260, 380, has an output capacitor for filtering ripple on the associated output, such as outputs 264, 266, 386.
A traditional way to filter output voltage transients due to current changes on outputs is to increase capacitance of output capacitors of the DC-DC converters, such as by increasing their values or by adding transient filter capacitors 702, 704, 706. Because of the opposite polarity of induced transients from the initial output transient, transient cancellation capacitors 708, 710, 712 may be added between some or all of outputs 264, 266, 386. Induced transients may vary in magnitude from output to output, depending on factors such as output voltages, degree of magnetic coupling, output currents, and other factors. Further, because outputs with low transient magnitude induce smaller disturbances at other outputs than outputs with high transients magnitude, in some embodiments, transient cancellation capacitors 708, 710 between high 264 and low transient outputs 266, 386 are provided, but transient cancellation capacitors 712 between different low-transient outputs are omitted.
Use of the transient cancellation capacitors, such as capacitors 708, 710, 712 permits operation with reduced values of transient filter capacitors 702, 704, 706 than otherwise required for converters with coupled inductors and independent voltage outputs and may produce a cost savings in a multiple-output converter system.
Changes may be made in the above methods and systems without departing from the scope hereof. Therefore, the matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings should be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense. The following claims are intended to cover generic and specific features described herein, as well as all statements of the scope of the present method and system, which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall therebetween.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/040,961 filed Mar. 4, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2170446 | Edwards | Aug 1939 | A |
2298935 | Freeman | Oct 1942 | A |
4531085 | Mesenhimer | Jul 1985 | A |
5003277 | Sokai et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5008794 | Leman | Apr 1991 | A |
5166869 | Hesterman | Nov 1992 | A |
5204809 | Andresen | Apr 1993 | A |
5317496 | Seiersen | May 1994 | A |
5436818 | Barthold | Jul 1995 | A |
5469334 | Balakrishnan | Nov 1995 | A |
6084790 | Wong | Jul 2000 | A |
6304460 | Cuk | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307757 | Porter et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6362986 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6388896 | Cuk | May 2002 | B1 |
6462964 | Porter et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6545450 | Ledenev et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6583992 | Porter et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6590786 | Gurov | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6590791 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6686727 | Ledenev et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6694438 | Porter et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6696823 | Ledenev et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6784644 | Xu et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6838863 | Hazucha et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6856230 | Lu | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6979980 | Hesterman et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6989997 | Xu et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7023186 | Yan | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7026800 | Liu et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7110266 | Porter et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7199695 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7233132 | Dong et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7239530 | Djekic et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7301317 | Mattingly | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7315463 | Schrom et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7317305 | Stratakos | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7352269 | Li et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7423894 | Ilic | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7463498 | Djekic et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7498920 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7504808 | Schrom et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7821375 | Dong et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7859238 | Stratakos et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7880577 | Glaser et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7994888 | Ikriannikov | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8125205 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8179116 | Wei et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8207717 | Uruno et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8233298 | Jang et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8416043 | Ikriannikov | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8547076 | Ikriannikov | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8570009 | Wei et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8716991 | Ikriannikov | May 2014 | B1 |
8937404 | Ferris | Jan 2015 | B1 |
20030102849 | Schiff et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030155894 | Dubhashi et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040201281 | Ma | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060012348 | Zhao et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060197510 | Chandrasekaran | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060226130 | Kooken et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070076453 | Schultz et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070097571 | Dinh et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070175701 | Xu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070176726 | Xu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070247882 | Chen | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080100273 | Uruno et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080150666 | Chandrasekaran | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080169769 | Lee | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080205098 | Xu et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080309299 | Wei et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090001945 | Wickersham et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090146622 | McDonald et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090179723 | Ikriannikov et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090206663 | Liu | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090231081 | Ikriannikov et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237197 | Ikriannikov et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100013304 | Heineman | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100097045 | Chen | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110018669 | Ikriannikov | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110032068 | Ikriannikov | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110035607 | Ikriannikov | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043317 | Ikriannikov | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110285369 | Cuk | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 755 060 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1 632 964 | Mar 2006 | EP |
11 307369 | Nov 1999 | JP |
WO 0217469 | Feb 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Nakanashi, H. et al., “A Two-stage Converter With a Coupled-Inductor,” 7th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems, 2007, 653-657 (PEDS'07). |
Chandrasekaran , S. et al., “Integrated Magnetics for Interleaved DC-DC Boost for Fuel Cell Powered Vehicles,” 35th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conferences, 356-61 (2004). |
Dong et al., Twisted Core Coupled Inductors for Microprocessor Voltage Regulators, Power Electronics Specialists Conference, pp. 2386-2392, Jun. 17-21, 2007. |
Dong et al., The Short Winding Path Coupled Inductor Voltage Regulators, Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, pp. 1446-1452, Feb. 24-28, 2008. |
Dong et al., Evaluation of Coupled Inductor Voltage Regulators, Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, pp. 831-837, Feb. 24-28, 2008. |
Wong, Pit-Leong, et al., Investigating Coupling Inductors in the Interleaving QSW VRM Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2000. APEC 2000. Fifteenth Annual IEEE; Mar. 2000; pp. 973-978. |
Wong, Pit-Leong, et al.; A Novel Modeling Concept for Multi-coupling Core Structures; Center for Power Electronics Systems; IEEE. |
Wong, Pit-Leong, et al.; Performance Improvements of Interleaving VRMs With Coupling Inductors, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics; vol. 16, No. 4; pp. 499-507; Jul. 2001. |
Xu, J., et al; Analysis by Finite Element Method of a Coupled Inductor Circuit Used as Current Injection Interface; IEEE; pp. 147-151; 1996. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/040,961, Non-Final Rejection, issued Dec. 9, 2013, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/040,961, Response to Office Action, filed Mar. 7, 2014, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/040,961, Final Rejection, issued Mar. 20, 2014, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/040,961, Response to Office Action, filed May 1, 2014, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/040,961, Notice of Allowance, issued May 23, 2014, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13040961 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 14324594 | US |