The present invention relates generally to integrated circuits, and more particularly relates to multistage differential amplifiers.
Generally, digital line drivers use multistage differential topologies to increase the output signal swing and the power delivered from a single supply. The use of a single differential amplifier helps reduce the area and power required to deliver a larger output signal swing. In such cases, using a very well known and wide spread frequency compensated multistage nested Miller architecture for amplifiers helps improve the odd-harmonic linearity since there are multiple negative feedback loops that correct for the linearity of a class AB output stage.
However, one problem with using the multistage nested Miller architecture is that the output stage not only has add-order harmonics but also has even-order harmonics. The even-order harmonics contribute to non-linearity. Since the multistage nested Miller architecture uses the differential scheme, the negative feedback loops have no impact on reducing the even-order harmonics. The common-mode feedback amplifier used to set the output common voltage is actually the loop that attenuates the even-order harmonics. The differential scheme helps improve the even-order harmonic performance further. Current solutions for the common mode feedback use a gm/gm amplifier to control the current in the second stage of the differential amplifier which then sets the common mode for the output stage.
The first stage in the differential loop has its own common mode feedback loop. This helps meet the stability requirements of both the common mode loops, but in the process of stabilizing, the first stage makes the gain-bandwidth of the output common mode loop similar to a two stage amplifier. In a three stage differential amplifier the even-order harmonics are attenuated using a two stage amplifier and the odd-order harmonics are attenuated by a three stage amplifier. The line driver's performance in a three stage differential amplifier is limited more by second harmonics than the odd harmonics despite the differential output stage, because the rejection of the even-order harmonics is significantly poor due to large differences in the current in the output stage under a low resistive load. Effectively, the combined rejection of the common mode feedback loop and the differential closed loop is generally not sufficient to reject the even-order harmonics to the same extent as a three stage nested Miller rejection of the odd harmonics.
Therefore, using the multistage differential amplifier for low resistive load applications can result in low second harmonic performance. The first option available to alleviate this problem is to use two single ended amplifiers, but this would significantly increase the power requirement for each of the amplifiers. The second option available is to use three stages in the differential loops for the common mode feedback loop, but this can be a significantly complex solution, since the differential loop is generally designed for handling a complete signal swing and hence can have larger capacitive loads at the internal nodes. The third option available would be to build a very high bandwidth two stage common mode loop to give more attenuation of the even-order harmonics, but this solution can result in requiring significantly more silicon area and power.
The various embodiments of the present invention provide a technique to attenuate even-order harmonics of the third stage of a multistage nested Miller compensation circuit. In one example embodiment, this is accomplished by keeping both the differential and the common mode feedback circuits as multistage nested Miller amplifiers. The common mode feedback circuit uses two of the differential stages of the nested Miller compensation circuit, thereby reducing the power and the silicon area required for the additional two stages of the common mode feedback circuit.
The present subject matter provides a technique to attenuate even-order harmonics of the third stage of a multistage nested Miller compensation circuit. In one example embodiment, this is accomplished by using a separate multistage loop for the common mode feedback loop. The common mode feedback loop is the fourth stage which uses the third stage of the nested Miller compensation circuit to give an effect similar to a third order loop for the attenuation of the even-order harmonics of the third stage.
In the following detailed description of the embodiments of the invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims.
In operation, the first inverting differential amplifier 110 receives an input voltage signal VIN and outputs a first amplified signal. The non-inverting differential amplifier 120 then receives the first amplified signal and outputs a second amplified signal. The second inverting differential amplifier 130 receives the second amplified signal and provides the outputs to drive the load. The resistors and capacitors are used to provide the compensation for the Miller differential amplifier 100 to be stable in the closed loop.
In operation, the common mode differential amplifier 210 receives an input voltage signal VIN and uses the common mode feedback loop 200 to output an amplified signal. The inverting amplifier 220 then receives the amplified signal and outputs an inverted signal to provide the polarity for the common mode feedback loop 200 for operating in a negative feedback environment. The stages 230 and 130 then receive the inverted signal and output a voltage signal VOUT. The compensation capacitor 270 shown in
The various embodiments of the present invention use a separate multi-stage loop for the common mode feedback loop 200, which includes stages 130, 320, and 220, as shown in
Using the last two stages 130 and 310 of the multistage differential amplifier 100 for the common mode feedback loop 200, allows for lower power consumption, lesser silicon area requirement, and a higher linearity performance when used to drive under low resistive loads. The operation of the multistage differential amplifier 100 and the common mode feedback loop 200 are described in more detail with reference to
The first MOS inverting differential stage 110 comprises MOS transistors M0-M7 which form a normal differential amplifier to run off of a 3V supply with its own common mode feedback loop. The MOS non-inverting differential stage 120 includes MOS transistors M24-M29, M30-M37, and M42 which form a folded cascode amplifier with an input arm running-off of the 3V supply and has a floating current source for coupling to the second MOS inverting differential stage 130. The second MOS inverting differential stage 130 comprises MOS transistors M8-M15 and M16-M23, which runs off of a 12V supply with a class AB output using drain or non-drain extended transistors as cascode for the output transistor. In these embodimets, the class AB stage refers to a stage that can have both current souce and current sink capabilities that can generally be higher than quiescent current in an output arm so that it is not limited in the current output capabilities. The differential biasing stage 310 comprises MOS transistors M38-M41 and M43-M46.
As shown in
At 620, the first differential amplified signal is amplified and a second differential amplified signal is outputted. At 630, the second differential amplified signal is amplified and a final differential amplified output signal is outputted. At 640, the final differential amplified output signal is sensed. In some embodiments, the sensing of the final differential amplified output signal includes averaging the final differential amplified output signal and outputting an averaged final amplified output signal. The averaged final amplified output signal is then divided and a lower voltage common mode signal is outputted. The lower voltage common mode signal is then amplified and a differential common mode feedback signal is outputted.
At 650, the final differential amplified output signal is controlled to set an average value of the final differential amplified output signal as a function of the sensed final differential amplified output signal to attenuate the even-order harmonics of the third stage of a multistage nested Miller compensation circuit according to embodiments of the present invention. In some embodiments, the final differential amplified output signal is controlled to set an average value of the final differential amplified output signal as a function of the differential common mode feed back signal. In these embodiments, the lower voltage common mode signal is inverted and an inverted lower voltage common mode signal is outputted to help achieve the required polarity for the overall feedback and compensation of the common mode feed back loop. Each of the above acts is explained in more detail with reference to
Although the method 600 includes acts 610-650 that are arranged serially in the exemplary embodiments, other embodiments of the present subject matter may execute two or more acts in parallel, using multiple processors or a single processor organized in two or more virtual machines or sub-processors. Moreover, still other embodiments may implement the acts as two or more specific interconnected hardware modules with related control and data signals communicated between and through the modules, or as portions of an application-specific integrated circuit. Thus, the exemplary process flow diagrams are applicable to software, firmware, and/or hardware implementations.
The above-described methods and apparatus provide various techniques to attenuate even-order harmonics in a third stage of a multistage nested Miller compensation circuit. It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the subject matter should, therefore, be determined with reference to the following claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
As shown herein, the present invention can be implemented in a number of different embodiments, including various methods, a circuit, a system, and an article comprising a machine-accessible medium having associated instructions.
Other embodiments will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. The elements, algorithms, and sequence of operations can all be varied to suit particular requirements. The operations described above with respect to the method illustrated in
It is emphasized that the Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. ยง 1.72(b) requiring an Abstract that will allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature and gist of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims.
In the foregoing detailed description of the embodiments of the invention, various features are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments of the invention require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the detailed description of the embodiments of the invention, with each claim standing on its own as a separate preferred embodiment.
The above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The scope of the invention should therefore be determined by the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
This application claims priority under 35 USC § 119 (e) (1) of provisional application No. 60/542,282, Filed on Feb. 9, 2004.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60542282 | Feb 2004 | US |