This invention relates generally to engine mounts and, more particularly, to a switchable multistate powertrain mounting system.
Conventional powertrain mounting systems generally operate to provide engine isolation and concurrently control engine motion. One common type of engine mount, the elastomeric engine mount, provides a fairly constant dynamic properties (e.g. elastic (K′) and loss (K″) rates) across the range of frequencies typically encountered in a specified application. The level of damping is generally increased or decreased by preselecting an elastomeric material having different properties and/or dimensions. Once constructed, set damping rate characteristics are provided regardless of the actual operating conditions encountered by the mount.
Hydraulic mounts were developed, in part, due to the desirability of providing a mount having a high damping coefficient for relatively high amplitude inputs and a relatively low damping coefficient for lower amplitude inputs. A typical hydraulic mount includes a pumping chamber enclosed by relatively thick elastomeric walls having an orifice track opening to the chamber and extending to a reservoir that is typically bounded by a flexible diaphragm. The reservoir is typically located on the opposite side of a partition from the pumping chamber. During compression, fluid is pressurized in the pumping chamber and flows through the orifice track to the reservoir. During rebound, fluid is drawn back to the pumping chamber from the reservoir. Mount dynamic stiffness and damping performance are determined by characteristics such as, for example, pumping chamber geometry, chamber wall material, and orifice track properties.
Additional increases in the performance characteristics of hydraulic mounts at selected frequency ranges were achieved by employing electronic control of the dynamic characteristics of the mount. This provided a preprogrammed ability to change the response of the mount to optimize dynamic performance. For example, in one known type of electronically controlled mount, a solenoid varies an orifice to provide fluid flow control between the pumping chamber and the reservoir of the mounts. In addition, engine mounting systems utilizing vacuum-driven switchable liquid-filled engine mounts were developed to provide different dynamic characteristics by selectively introducing into the chambers of the mount either (1) a vacuum from the intake manifold of an engine or (2) atmospheric pressure. Thus far, however, such engine mounts are capable of assuming only two states of dynamic stiffness and damping.
It would therefore be desirable to provide a switchable engine mount capable of providing at least three distinctive states with unique dynamic characteristics for use in an improved switchable powertrain mounting system. Furthermore, it would be desirable to provide a switchable powertrain mounting system that provides at least three selectable distinctive states based on the operating conditions of the vehicle. Other desirable features and characteristics will become apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and the foregoing technical field and background.
An engine mount system is provided for managing vehicular vibrations. A housing has a first end that includes a compliant member a second end coupled to a vehicle structure. An inertia track assembly is coupled within the housing that forms a first fluid chamber with the first compliant member and a second fluid chamber with the second end. The inertia track assembly has at least first and second passageways therethrough for conducting fluid between the first and second fluid chambers. The first passageway has a substantially greater flow resistance than the second passageway. First and second switches coupled to the first and second passageways, respectively, are provided for selectively enabling the first and second switches to control fluid displacement between the first fluid chamber and the second fluid chamber.
An engine mount is provided for managing vehicle vibration. A first four-state engine mount has a first port and a second port. A second four-state engine mount has a third port and a fourth port. A first solenoid valve has an output coupled to the first port and to the third port and has a first input configured to be coupled to a source of pressure and a second input configured to be coupled to atmospheric pressure. A second solenoid valve has an output coupled to the second port and the fourth port and has a first input configured to be coupled to the source of pressure and a second input configured to be coupled to atmospheric pressure. A processor has at least one input indicative of an operational condition and has a first output coupled to an input of the first solenoid valve and has a second output coupled to an input of the second solenoid valve to selectively apply the pressure to the first and third ports and second and fourth ports to achieve four distinct states of stiffness and damping.
The present invention will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the following drawing figures, wherein like numerals denote like elements, and:
The following detailed description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the invention or the application and uses of the invention. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any expressed or implied theory presented in the preceding technical field, background, brief summary or the following detailed description.
The following description refers to elements or features being “connected” or “coupled” together. As used herein, “connected” may refer to one element/feature being directly joined to (or directly communicating with) another element/feature, and not necessarily mechanically. Likewise, “coupled” may refer to one element/feature being directly or indirectly joined to (or directly or indirectly communicating with) another element/feature, and not necessarily mechanically. However, it should be understood that although two elements may be described below, in one embodiment, as being “connected,” in alternative embodiments similar elements may be “coupled,” and vice versa. Thus, although the schematic diagrams shown herein depict example arrangements of elements, additional intervening elements, devices, features, or components may be present in an actual embodiment. It should also be understood that
Within mount 20 is a first fluid chamber (e.g. upper fluid chamber 38) and a second fluid chamber (e.g. lower fluid chamber 40) each filled with a fluid such as liquid glycol. Upper and lower fluid chambers 38 and 40, respectively, are fluidly coupled together by means of an inertia track assembly 42 that comprises a first channel 46 and a second channel 48. A first switch assembly 33 is configured to affect the volumetric dilation of the upper chamber thus opening and closing first channel 46 by means of a control signal applied to input 37. Similarly, a second switch assembly 35 is configured to open and close second channel 48 in response to an appropriate signal at input 39. Inputs 37 and 39 are coupled to a processor as shown. First channel 46 is configured to have a greater resistance to flow than does second channel 48 as is graphically represented by the smaller width of first channel 46. This may be achieved by making channel 48 shorter with a greater cross-section.
The operation of engine mount 20 may be described as follows. In response to engine or road excitation, fluid is pushed by upper compliance 32 from upper fluid chamber 38 to lower fluid chamber 40. As alluded to previously, the degree of dynamic stiffness and damping of engine mount 20 depends, in part, on the ease with which the fluid flows between upper fluid chamber 38 and the lower fluid chamber 40 and the masses of fluid in the first channel 46 and second channel 48. The fluid in first channel 46 or second channel 48 participates in a resonant system having frequency dependent upon the volumetric dilation of the chambers, and fluid volumetric displacements based on such properties as the mass of fluid in the channels and elasticity of compliant elements 32 and 36. Since ease of flow through channels 46 and 48 depends on channel length, cross-section, surface friction, and fluid entry and exit area constrictions and refractions, the channels can also be tuned to provide a differential resistance to flow.
Thus, mount 20 can be configured to exhibit varying levels of dynamic stiffness and damping by independently opening and closing switches 33 and 35 in a programmed fashion. Thus, the mount shown in
It should be clear that the mount shown in
Within mount 20 is a first fluid chamber (e.g. upper fluid chamber 38) and a second fluid chamber (e.g. lower fluid chamber 40) each filled with a fluid such as liquid glycol. Upper and lower fluid chambers 38 and 40, respectively, are fluidly coupled together by means of an inertia track assembly 42 that comprises a resilient decoupler 44 (e.g. a compliant membrane), a first fluid track (e.g. a bounce fluid channel 46), a second fluid track (e.g. an idle fluid channel 48), and a vacuum chamber (e.g. a bounce vacuum chamber 50). An idle track bypass mechanism 52 is positioned within housing 22 proximate idle fluid channel 48 for opening and closing idle fluid channel 48 as will be further described below. Finally, a first vacuum port 54 (e.g. a bounce vacuum port) through housing 22 couples either a first pressure (e.g. atmospheric) or a second pressure (e.g. a vacuum) to bounce vacuum chamber 50, and a second vacuum port 56 (e.g. an idle vacuum port) through housing 22 couples either the first pressure or the second source of pressure to idle track bypass mechanism 52. Vacuum, as used herein is intended to mean a lower pressure (below atmospheric).
The operation of engine mount 20 may be described as follows. In response to engine or road excitation, fluid is pushed by upper compliance 32 from upper fluid chamber 38 to lower fluid chamber 40. As alluded to previously, the degree of dynamic stiffness and damping of engine mount 20 depends, in part, on the ease with which the fluid flows between the upper fluid chamber 38 and the lower fluid chamber 40 and the masses of fluid in the bounce fluid channel 46 and idle fluid channel 48. The fluid in bounce fluid channel 46 or idle fluid channel 48 participates in a resonant system whose frequency is based on such properties as the mass of fluid in the track, elasticity of compliant elements 32 and 36, the volumetric dilation of the chambers, and fluid volumetric displacements. Since ease of flow through channels 46 and 48 depends on track length, cross-section, surface friction, and fluid entry and exit area constrictions and refractions, the tracks can also be tuned to provide a differential resistance to flow.
At speeds less than or equal to a predetermined speed, for example five miles-per-hour (mph) (hereinafter referred to as the idle-in-drive state), the second pressure (e.g. vacuum) is applied to both the bounce vacuum port 54 and the idle vacuum port 56. This causes decoupler 44 to be constrained against a bottom wall of bounce vacuum chamber 50, and idle fluid channel 48 to be opened. Fluid from upper fluid chamber 38 flows through idle fluid channel 48 as indicated by arrows 47 rather than through bounce fluid channel 46 because the dynamic resistance of the fluid column in bounce fluid channel 46 is designed to be greater than that of the fluid column in idle fluid channel 48. For example, idle fluid channel 48 may have a larger cross-sectional area and a smaller flow length than does bounce inertia channel 46. That is, the ratio of the cross-sectional area to the length of the idle inertia track 48 is greater than that of bounce inertia channel 46. Accordingly, the resonant frequency is higher with flow through the idle channel 48 than with flow through the bounce inertia channel 46. This leads to a favorable reduction in the dynamic stiffness at a targeted range of frequencies that can be aligned with disproportional large periodic engine excitation typically encountered during idle operation.
At speeds between about five mph and 50 mph (hereinafter referred to as the driveaway state), the first pressure is applied to both the bounce port 54 and the idle port 56. Thus, decoupler 44 is permitted to breathe in response to external excitations of upper compliance 32, and no fluid flows through idle fluid channel 48. In this case, the mount exhibits a low dynamic stiffness to provide maximum isolation over a frequency range encountered in the vehicle speed range.
At speeds greater than approximately fifty mph (hereinafter referred to as the highway cruise state), the second pressure is applied to the bounce vacuum port 54, but is not applied to the idle vacuum port 56, which remains at the first pressure (atmospheric). Thus, decoupler 44 is fully constrained against a bottom wall of bounce chamber 50, and fluid is prevented from flowing through idle fluid channel 48. Fluid is forced to flow through bounce channel 46 as indicated by arrows 45. Thus, the mount provides very high dynamic stiffness to attenuate smooth road shake on the vehicle floor and at the steering wheel.
Finally, when the second pressure (e.g. vacuum) is applied to idle port 56 but not to the bounce port 54, idle fluid channel 48 is opened and decoupler 44 is not constrained. Thus, decoupler 44 is unconstrained, and fluid is allowed to flow through idle track 48. Therefore, the mount is placed in a fourth state that provides low dynamic stiffness and damping over an extended frequency range.
First and second solenoid valves, 62 and 64 respectively, each have a first input coupled to a vacuum source 66 via tubes 68 and 70 respectively, a second input coupled to a source of atmosphere 67 via tubes 69 and 71 respectively, and a third input coupled to processor 72 via conductors 74 and 76 respectively. A plurality of input signals 78 representative of vehicle operational conditions are processed within processor 72 and thus affect the manner in which processor 72 controls solenoid valves 62 and 64. Processor 72 may comprise one or more processors typically found on a vehicle; for example, a chassis control module. Vacuum source 66 may comprise the vehicle's engine vacuum source.
Solenoid valve 62 selectively communicates either a vacuum from vacuum source 66 or atmospheric pressure from source 67 to the idle ports 80 and 82 of first mount 84 and second mount 86, respectively, by means of tubes 88 and 90. Similarly, solenoid valve 64 communicates a vacuum from vacuum source 66 or atmospheric pressure from source 67 to the bounce ports 92 and 94 of first mount 84 and second mount 86, respectively, via tubes 96 and 98, respectively. First mount 84 and second mount 86 are of the type described above in connection with
Thus, there has been described an engine mount and a powertrain mount system that provides at least three distinct states of damping or stiffness based on vehicular operating conditions. Of course, changes in form and details may be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, while the application of a vacuum has been employed to control decoupler 44 (
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4432441 | Kurokawa | Feb 1984 | A |
4583723 | Ozawa | Apr 1986 | A |
4641817 | Clark et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4650170 | Fukushima | Mar 1987 | A |
4733758 | Duclos et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4789142 | Hoying et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4793599 | Ishioka | Dec 1988 | A |
4901986 | Smith | Feb 1990 | A |
4969632 | Hodgson et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5029677 | Mitsui | Jul 1991 | A |
5116029 | Gennesseaux | May 1992 | A |
5167403 | Muramatsu et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5205546 | Schisler et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5215293 | Muramatsu et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5217211 | Ide et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5353839 | Kordonsky et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5398917 | Carlson et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5462261 | Eckel et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5769402 | Ide et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5927699 | Nakajima et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6036183 | Lee et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6095486 | Ivers et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6176477 | Takeo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6422545 | Baudendistel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6439556 | Baudendistel et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6491290 | Muramatsu et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6612409 | Lun et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6637556 | Lun | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6659436 | Muramatsu et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6698732 | Takashima et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6808168 | Muramatsu et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6902156 | Muramatsu et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7048264 | Anzawa et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7188830 | Kato et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194344 | Gee et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7210674 | Maeno et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7350776 | Muramatsu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7416173 | Tanaka | Aug 2008 | B2 |
8091872 | Koyama et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20040084263 | Kintz et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040150146 | Takeo et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050127586 | Maeno et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060038331 | Ogawa et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070138718 | Muraoka | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070138719 | Ichikawa et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090008195 | Ueki | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007029739 | Mar 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 9, 2011 for Chinese Application No. 200910206188.4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100096789 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |