The subject matter disclosed herein generally relates to overlay file systems. Specifically, the present disclosure addresses systems and methods to realize multitenancy using an overlay file system.
An overlay file system provides a logical file system that merges two or more physical file systems. Any files that are present in exactly one of the merged file systems are presented unchanged in the resulting logical file system. For files that are presented in more than one of the merged file systems, one of the files is selected by the overlay file system to be presented in the logical file system.
An artifact is a file, such as a Java archive (JAR) file, that includes one or more files for an application. The files within the artifact may be source files, executable files, and description files. A software package comprises one or more artifacts. The source files and executable files of the artifacts are used to execute the software package itself. A description file includes information about the artifact, including dependencies of the artifact. A first artifact is dependent on a second artifact if the first artifact requires the second artifact in order to be used.
Multitenancy is a software architecture in which multiple instances of a software application operate in a shared environment. The instances are logically separated.
Some embodiments are illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings.
Example methods and systems are directed to multitenancy using an overlay file system. Each tenant has one or more users and a tenant layer in the overlay file system. Each user has a user layer in the overlay file system. The overlay file system provides a logical file system to each user based on the user layer, the tenant layer, and a strategy comprising a set of application layers.
A first user shares a file with other users of the same tenant by moving the file from the first user's user layer to the tenant layer. After the file is moved, all users of the tenant have access to the file. The moving of the file is achieved by modifying metadata for the file.
By comparison with existing methods of sharing files among users of a single tenant, the methods and systems discussed herein improve efficiency by avoiding copying of data. Updating the metadata for a file is a faster operation than copying the file from a user area to a tenant area. Accordingly, the performance of the application server is improved. Furthermore, processor cycles involved in file copying are saved. Furthermore, by comparison with prior art solutions in which files are shared by duplication (e.g., by placing the files in multiple user areas instead of in a single tenant area), storage resources are saved.
The client device 140 may provide identifying information to the application server 110, and the identifying information may be used by the application server 110 to determine how to interpret which of the application layers 130A-130D to combine in providing a logical file system to the client device 140.
Any of the machines, databases, or devices shown in
The application server 110 and the client devices 140A-140C are connected by the network 150. The network 150 may be any network that enables communication between or among machines, databases, and devices. Accordingly, the network 150 may be a wired network, a wireless network (e.g., a mobile or cellular network), or any suitable combination thereof. The network 150 may include one or more portions that constitute a private network, a public network (e.g., the Internet), or any suitable combination thereof.
The communication module 210 receives data sent to the application server 110 and transmits data from the application server 110. For example, the communication module 210 may receive, from the client device 140A, a request to share a file stored on a first layer of an overlay file system. The request to share the file is a request to share the file with other client devices 140 of the same tenant and the first layer is a layer accessible by the client device 140A but not to other client devices 140 of the same tenant. The communication module 210 provides the request to the layer module 230. The layer module 230 updates metadata for the file to move the file to a layer corresponding to the tenant. Communications sent and received by the communication module 210 may be intermediated by the network 150.
The user interface module 220 causes presentation of a user interface for the application server 110 on a display associated with the client device 140A, 140B, or 140C. The user interface allows a user to select a file from a list of files, to interact with an application, or any suitable combination thereof.
Each of the rows 330A-330D of the user table 310 includes a user identifier, a tenant identifier, and permissions. The user identifier is a unique identifier of the user. The tenant identifier identifies the tenant of the user (e.g., the business entity that is a customer of the business providing the application server 110). The permissions indicate whether the user has read-only access or all rights (e.g., read-write access) to their own files and to tenant-level files. Using the overlay file system, each user will see a file system comprising files from layers of the strategy of the tenant plus user-specific files.
The layers used in the strategies are identified in the rows 360A-360D of the strategy table 340. Each row includes a strategy identifier, a layer identifier, and a layer order. The rows 360A and 360B together indicate that, for strategy 1, layer 1 is the top layer and layer 2 is a lower layer. The rows 360C and 360D together indicate that, for strategy 2, layer 2 is the top layer and layer 3 is a lower later.
The relationship between the strategies defined in the strategy table 340 and the tenants are defined in the tenant table 370. Each of the rows 390A-390D relates a tenant identifier to a strategy identifier. Thus, when a user connects to the application server 110 using a user identifier, cross-referencing of the tenant identifier in the user table 310 with the tenant identifier in the tenant table 370 identifies the strategy for the user and reference to the strategy table 340 enables the overlay file system to determine the strategy to be used in providing the logical file system to the user.
Each row 430A-430C of the dependency table 410 includes a layer identifier and a dependency list. The dependency list indicates which layers the identified layer is dependent on. Thus, the row 430A indicates that the application on layer 1 is dependent on the application on layer 2. Thus, if a user installs the application on layer 1, adding layer 1 to their strategy, the application server 110 is enabled to automatically add layer 2 to the strategy as well. In this way, applications are (logically) installed with their dependencies, and are able to function without the user being required to install the dependencies manually.
The file table 440 provides name, including a full path, for each file and identifies the layer on which the file is stored. The overlay file system refers to the layer identifier of each file in constructing the logical file system according to the layer strategy of a user account. Thus, by changing the layer identifier for a file in the file table 440, the logical file system is updated for user accounts using the original layer identifier, the changed layer identifier, or both. A user interface may display a list of human-readable file names and layer identifiers to enable a user to select a file to move, select the layer to move the file to, or both.
Each of the tenant views 540A, 540B, and 540C includes a reference to one of the tenant layers 520A-520C and one of the strategies 530A-530B. One tenant view is created for each tenant of the application server 110. Using a tenant view, the overlay file system provides a logical file system in which a tenant layer 520 is overlaid on the logical file system for the underlying strategy. Thus, in the tenant view 540A, the tenant layer 520A is played over the strategy 530A. Since the strategy 530A comprises the application layer 130A over the application layer 130B, the set of layers for the tenant view 540A is the tenant layer 520A, the application 130A, and the application layer 130B. Other examples are shown for the tenant views 540B and 540C.
Each of the user views 560A, 560B, 560C, 560D, and 560E includes a reference to one of the user layers 510A-510E and one of the tenant views 540A-540C. One user view is created for each user of the application server 110. Using a user view, the overlay file system provides a logical file system in which a user layer 510 is overlaid on the logical file system for the underlying tenant. Thus, in the user view 560A, the user layer 510A is played over the tenant view 540A. Since the tenant view 540A comprises tenant layer 520A over the strategy 530A and the strategy 530A comprises the application layer 130A over the application layer 130B, the set of layers for the user view 560A is the user layer 510A, the tenant layer 520A, the application 130A, and the application layer 130B. Other examples are shown for the user views 560B-560E.
In some example embodiments, each user has read-write access to the corresponding user layer 510, configurable access to the corresponding tenant layer 520 (e.g., using the permissions field of the user table 310 of
Since each layer is stored only once in the file system, substantial space savings result in comparison with prior art solutions in which application files, tenant files, or both are duplicated for each user.
In operation 810, the strategy module 240 receives, via a network 150, a first request from a first user device associated with a first user identifier of a tenant to share a file stored in a first layer of an overlay file system of a storage device, the first layer corresponding to the first user identifier. For example, a user logs in using the user device 140A by providing credentials corresponding to the row 330B of the user table 310, associating the device 140A with the user identifier 2. The user device 140A transmits a request via the network 150 to share a file stored in the layer 510B of
In operation 820, in response to the first request, the layer module 230 moves the file from the first layer to a second layer of the overlay files system, the second layer corresponding to the tenant. In this example, the file is moved from the layer 510B to the layer 520B, corresponding to the tenant.
The strategy module 240 receives, via the network 150, a second request from a second user device associated with a second user identifier of the tenant to access the file (operation 830). Continuing with this example, another user logs in using the user device 140B by providing credentials corresponding to the row 330C of the user table 310, associating the user device 140B with the user identifier 3. the user identified in the row 330C of the user table 310 attempts to access the file. The request is made from the client device 140B via the network 150, as shown in
In operation 840, the strategy module 240, in response to the second request and based on the file being on the second layer, provides access to the file to the second user. In this example, the strategy module 240 determines that the file is part of the overlay file system for the second user because the file is on the layer for the tenant of the second user.
In operation 910, the strategy module 240 receives, via a network 150, a first request from a first user device associated with a first user identifier of a tenant to cease sharing a file stored in a second layer of an overlay file system, the second layer corresponding to the tenant. For example, a user device associated with the user identified in the row 330C of the user table 310 requests to cease sharing a file stored in the layer 520B of
In operation 920, in response to the first request, the layer module 230 moves the file from the second layer to a first layer of the overlay file system, the first layer corresponding to the first user identifier. In this example, the file is moved from the layer 520B to the layer 510B, corresponding to the first user identifier. In some example embodiments, user permissions are checked to determine if the first user identifier has permission to modify the second layer. In this example, since the user identified in the row 330C has “user all” and “tenant all” permissions, operation 920 is performed. If the user identifier did not have permissions to modify the second layer, an informative message would be displayed and the method 900 would terminate.
The strategy module 240 receives, via the network 150, a second request from a second user device associated with a second user identifier of the tenant to access the file (operation 930). Continuing with this example, a user device associated with the user identified in the row 330B of the user table 310 attempts to access the file. The request is made from the client device 140B via the network 150, as shown in
In operation 940, the strategy module 240, in response to the second request and based on the file being on the first layer, refrains from providing access to the file to the second user device. In this example, the strategy module 240 determines that the file is not part of the overlay file system for the second user identifier because the file is not on any layer accessible by the second user (in this example, because the file is on the layer for the first user identifier and the layer for the first user identifier is not accessible by the second user identifier).
Thus, the method 900 is the inverse of the method 800. By use of the methods 800 and 900, access to files for users of a tenant can be controlled. In example embodiments that move files from one layer to another by changing an attribute of the file instead of copying the data of the file, performance is improved over prior art file systems that spend processor cycles and storage device access time moving or duplicating data. For example, the layer identifier in the file table 440 may be updated for the file to move the file from one layer to another without copying the file's data.
A method comprising:
The method of example 1, wherein the moving of the file from the first layer to a second layer comprises updating an attribute of the file.
The method of example 1 or example 2, wherein the moving of the file from the first layer to the second layer does not include copying data of the file.
The method of any of examples 1 to 3, wherein the first user identifier has read-write access to the first layer and read-only access to a third layer of the overlay file system.
The method of any of examples 1 to 4, wherein the second layer is unavailable to a third user device associated with a third user identifier of a second tenant.
The method of any of examples 1 to 5, wherein the first layer is unavailable to the second user device associated with the second user identifier.
The method of any of examples 1 to 6, further comprising:
The method of example 7, wherein:
A system comprising
The system of example 9, wherein the moving of the file from the first layer to a second layer comprises updating an attribute of the file.
The system of example 9 or example 10, wherein the moving of the file from the first layer to the second layer does not include copying data of the file.
The system of any of examples 9 to 11, wherein the first user identifier has read-write access to the first layer and read-only access to a third layer of the overlay file system.
The system of any of examples 9 to 12, wherein the second layer is unavailable to a third user device associated with a third user identifier of a second tenant.
The system of any of examples 9 to 13, wherein the first layer is unavailable to the second user device.
The system of any of examples 9 to 14, wherein the operations further comprise:
The system of example 15, wherein:
A non-transitory computer-readable medium that stores instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:
The computer-readable medium of example 17, wherein the moving of the file from the first layer to a second layer comprises updating an attribute of the file.
The computer-readable medium of example 17 or example 18, wherein the moving of the file from the first layer to the second layer does not include copying data of the file.
The computer-readable medium of any of examples 17 to 19, wherein the first user identifier has read-write access to the first layer and read-only access to a third layer of the overlay file system.
The machine 1000 includes a processor 1002 (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU), a digital signal processor (DSP), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a radio-frequency integrated circuit (RFIC), or any suitable combination thereof), a main memory 1004, and a static memory 1006, which are configured to communicate with each other via a bus 1008. The machine 1000 may further include a graphics display 1010 (e.g., a plasma display panel (PDP), a light-emitting diode (LED) display, a liquid crystal display (LCD), a projector, or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). The machine 1000 may also include an alphanumeric input device 1012 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 1014 (e.g., a mouse, a touchpad, a trackball, a joystick, a motion sensor, or another pointing instrument), a storage unit 1016, a signal generation device 1018 (e.g., a speaker), and a network interface device 1020.
The storage unit 1016 includes a machine-readable medium 1022 on which are stored the instructions 1024 embodying any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein. The instructions 1024 may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 1004, within the processor 1002 (e.g., within the processor's cache memory), or both, during execution thereof by the machine 1000. Accordingly, the main memory 1004 and the processor 1002 may be considered as machine-readable media. The instructions 1024 may be transmitted or received over a network 1026 via the network interface device 1020.
As used herein, the term “memory” refers to a machine-readable medium able to store data temporarily or permanently and may be taken to include, but not be limited to, random-access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), buffer memory, flash memory, and cache memory. While the machine-readable medium 1022 is shown, in an example embodiment, to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, or associated caches and servers) able to store instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” shall also be taken to include any medium, or combination of multiple media, that is capable of storing instructions for execution by a machine (e.g., the machine 1000), such that the instructions, when executed by one or more processors of the machine (e.g., the processor 1002), cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies described herein. Accordingly, a “machine-readable medium” refers to a single storage apparatus or device, as well as “cloud-based” storage systems or storage networks that include multiple storage apparatus or devices. The term “machine-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, one or more data repositories in the form of a solid-state memory, an optical medium, a magnetic medium, or any suitable combination thereof.
Throughout this specification, plural instances may implement components, operations, or structures described as a single instance. Although individual operations of one or more methods are illustrated and described as separate operations, one or more of the individual operations may be performed concurrently, and nothing requires that the operations be performed in the order illustrated. Structures and functionality presented as separate components in example configurations may be implemented as a combined structure or component. Similarly, structures and functionality presented as a single component may be implemented as separate components. These and other variations, modifications, additions, and improvements fall within the scope of the subject matter herein.
Certain embodiments are described herein as including logic or a number of components, modules, or mechanisms. Modules may constitute either software modules (e.g., code embodied on a machine-readable medium or in a transmission signal) or hardware modules. A “hardware module” is a tangible unit capable of performing certain operations and may be configured or arranged in a certain physical manner. In various example embodiments, one or more computer systems (e.g., a standalone computer system, a client computer system, or a server computer system) or one or more hardware modules of a computer system (e.g., a processor or a group of processors) may be configured by software (e.g., an application or application portion) as a hardware module that operates to perform certain operations as described herein.
In some embodiments, a hardware module may be implemented mechanically, electronically, or any suitable combination thereof. For example, a hardware module may include dedicated circuitry or logic that is permanently configured to perform certain operations. For example, a hardware module may be a special-purpose processor, such as a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) or an ASIC. A hardware module may also include programmable logic or circuitry that is temporarily configured by software to perform certain operations. For example, a hardware module may include software encompassed within a general-purpose processor or other programmable processor. It will be appreciated that the decision to implement a hardware module mechanically, in dedicated and permanently configured circuitry, or in temporarily configured circuitry (e.g., configured by software) may be driven by cost and time considerations.
Accordingly, the phrase “hardware module” should be understood to encompass a tangible entity, be that an entity that is physically constructed, permanently configured (e.g., hardwired), or temporarily configured (e.g., programmed) to operate in a certain manner or to perform certain operations described herein. As used herein, “hardware-implemented module” refers to a hardware module. Considering embodiments in which hardware modules are temporarily configured (e.g., programmed), each of the hardware modules need not be configured or instantiated at any one instant in time. For example, where a hardware module comprises a general-purpose processor configured by software to become a special-purpose processor, the general-purpose processor may be configured as respectively different special-purpose processors (e.g., comprising different hardware modules) at different times. Software may accordingly configure a processor, for example, to constitute a particular hardware module at one instant of time and to constitute a different hardware module at a different instant of time.
Hardware modules can provide information to, and receive information from, other hardware modules. Accordingly, the described hardware modules may be regarded as being communicatively coupled. Where multiple hardware modules exist contemporaneously, communications may be achieved through signal transmission (e.g., over appropriate circuits and buses) between or among two or more of the hardware modules. In embodiments in which multiple hardware modules are configured or instantiated at different times, communications between such hardware modules may be achieved, for example, through the storage and retrieval of information in memory structures to which the multiple hardware modules have access. For example, one hardware module may perform an operation and store the output of that operation in a memory device to which it is communicatively coupled. A further hardware module may then, at a later time, access the memory device to retrieve and process the stored output. Hardware modules may also initiate communications with input or output devices, and can operate on a resource (e.g., a collection of information).
The various operations of example methods described herein may be performed, at least partially, by one or more processors that are temporarily configured (e.g., by software) or permanently configured to perform the relevant operations. Whether temporarily or permanently configured, such processors may constitute processor-implemented modules that operate to perform one or more operations or functions described herein. As used herein, “processor-implemented module” refers to a hardware module implemented using one or more processors.
Similarly, the methods described herein may be at least partially processor-implemented, a processor being an example of hardware. For example, at least some of the operations of a method may be performed by one or more processors or processor-implemented modules. Moreover, the one or more processors may also operate to support performance of the relevant operations in a “cloud computing” environment or as a “software as a service” (SaaS). For example, at least some of the operations may be performed by a group of computers (as examples of machines including processors), with these operations being accessible via a network (e.g., the Internet) and via one or more appropriate interfaces (e.g., an application programming interface (API)).
The performance of certain of the operations may be distributed among the one or more processors, not only residing within a single machine, but deployed across a number of machines. In some example embodiments, the one or more processors or processor-implemented modules may be located in a single geographic location (e.g., within a home environment, an office environment, or a server farm). In other example embodiments, the one or more processors or processor-implemented modules may be distributed across a number of geographic locations.
Some portions of the subject matter discussed herein may be presented in terms of algorithms or symbolic representations of operations on data stored as bits or binary digital signals within a machine memory (e.g., a computer memory). Such algorithms or symbolic representations are examples of techniques used by those of ordinary skill in the data processing arts to convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. As used herein, an “algorithm” is a self-consistent sequence of operations or similar processing leading to a desired result. In this context, algorithms and operations involve physical manipulation of physical quantities. Typically, but not necessarily, such quantities may take the form of electrical, magnetic, or optical signals capable of being stored, accessed, transferred, combined, compared, or otherwise manipulated by a machine. It is convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to such signals using words such as “data,” “content,” “bits,” “values,” “elements,” “symbols,” “characters,” “terms,” “numbers,” “numerals,” or the like. These words, however, are merely convenient labels and are to be associated with appropriate physical quantities.
Unless specifically stated otherwise, discussions herein using words such as “processing,” “computing,” “calculating,” “determining,” “presenting,” “displaying,” or the like may refer to actions or processes of a machine (e.g., a computer) that manipulates or transforms data represented as physical (e.g., electronic, magnetic, or optical) quantities within one or more memories (e.g., volatile memory, non-volatile memory, or any suitable combination thereof), registers, or other machine components that receive, store, transmit, or display information. Furthermore, unless specifically stated otherwise, the terms “a” and “an” are herein used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one instance. Finally, as used herein, the conjunction “or” refers to a non-exclusive “or,” unless specifically stated otherwise.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6356915 | Chtchetkine et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
7620948 | Rowe et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7636722 | Bunker et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7769794 | Moore et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
9766881 | Wong | Sep 2017 | B2 |
10169347 | Jayachandran et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10809994 | Fitzer et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
10866938 | Gupta | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10942723 | Fitzer et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10956140 | Fitzer et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20040064589 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064590 | Starr et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040189707 | Moore et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193594 | Moore et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193621 | Moore et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193672 | Samji et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193673 | Samji et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040204941 | Israch et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230599 | Moore et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050246331 | De Vorchik et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060036568 | Moore et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070067349 | Jhaveri et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067497 | Craft et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070245257 | Chan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090157627 | Arthursson | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090305778 | Yu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110119634 | Bhatt et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120011562 | Slater | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120047139 | Fitzer | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120110328 | Pate et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120166488 | Kaushik et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120198559 | Venkata | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140074782 | Green et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140248002 | Thakkar et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150128105 | Sethi et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150261774 | Mcferrin et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150261782 | Mcferrin et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150261971 | Mcferrin et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150268948 | Plate | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160261684 | Khalaf et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160378348 | Uriel | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160378676 | Uriel | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170048079 | Nethi et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170075675 | Babol et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170078094 | Olson | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170206071 | Kirkpatrick | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170344292 | Sterin et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170364342 | Shuster et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180027006 | Zimmermann et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180027070 | Jhanji et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180129479 | Mcpherson et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180129803 | Levin et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180189121 | Jobi et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180196654 | Bo et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180211029 | Ryu et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180293066 | Ali et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180295059 | Gamage | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180341471 | Stefanov et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180351870 | Chen | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180356964 | Morris | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180357068 | Ambichl et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190004779 | Schmidt et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190026474 | Adam et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190042286 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190095179 | Straub | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190146830 | Gerber et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190173949 | Inomata et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190205289 | Kleinpeter | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190227794 | Mercille et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190235900 | Singh et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190272224 | Woods | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190324786 | Ranjan et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190349402 | Shukla et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200019410 | Dima et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200034170 | Chen et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200034745 | Nagpal et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200104385 | Zheng et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200319869 | Fitzer et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200319870 | Fitzer et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200319871 | Fitzer et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200320042 | Fitzer et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210149657 | Fitzer et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Venkatesh, Sunil. Dynamically reconfigurable layered filesystem, (2012), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (Year: 2012). |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,408, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 3, 2020”. |
Heiner, Andreas P., “Secure Software Installation in a Mobile Environment”, (Jul. 18-20, 2007), pp. 155-156. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,305, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2020”. |
Brown, Nigel, “The Overlay File System”, [Online], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://windsock.io/the-overlay-filesystem/>, (May 22, 2015), 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,305, Response filed Apr. 24, 2020 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2020”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,408, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2020”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,408, Response filed May 28, 2020 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2020”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,453, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2020”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,453, Response filed May 27, 2020 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2020”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,408, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jun. 2, 2020”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,453, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jun. 2, 2020”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,305, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jun. 4, 2020”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,305, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 30, 2020”, 7 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. 17/162,529, filed Jan. 29, 2021, Software Installation Through an Overlay File System. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/369,059, filed Jul. 7, 2021, Multitenant Application Server Using a Union File System. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,305, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 24, 2020”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,351, Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 11, 2021”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,351, Examiner Interview Summary dated May 26, 2021”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,351, Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2021”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,351, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 16, 2021”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,351, Response filed Jun. 1, 2021 to Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2021”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,453, Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Dec. 8, 2020”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,453, Examiner Interview Summary dated Oct. 6, 2020”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,453, Final Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2020”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,453, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 28, 2020”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,453, Response filed Oct. 6, 2020 to Final Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2020”, 8 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200320041 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |