Patent Grant
11957788
The inventions disclosed herein were made pursuant to a joint research agreement between Exicure Inc., now named Exicure Operating Company, and Northwestern University.
This application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted in ASCII format via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Aug. 18, 2021, is named A110770003US3-SEQ-DQB and is 5,636 bytes in size.
The immune system is a complex network of cellular and humoral components that act in concert to recognize foreign and potentially dangerous substances in the body and eliminate them in a highly targeted and controlled fashion. It can generally be divided into the innate and adaptive immune systems. The innate immune system is germline encoded and is designed to respond to conserved motifs present on pathogens. The adaptive immune system develops its antigen specificity repertoire through controlled somatic recombination processes and can respond with exquisite specificity to a wide variety of antigen types. Stimulating innate and adaptive immune responses have been shown to be an effective strategy to treat or prevent a wide variety of diseases in animals, animal disease models, and humans.
The success of immunomodulatory approaches in treating or preventing a variety of infectious diseases has been extraordinary. Despite this, there are potentially many more diseases that could be addressed using an immunotherapy approach. Two critical limitations remain: (1) properly priming innate immune cells with the right signals delivered at the optimal time and in optimal ratios to safely boost their function while also providing a suitable environment for inducing an adaptive immune response, and (2) identifying the right antigen or combination of antigens that should be targeted by the adaptive response.
Current approaches for stimulating an immune response largely depend on mixtures of compounds that are known to be immunomodulatory in isolation. At present, compounds that are used in the clinic are bulk mixtures of immune stimulants, optionally combined with antigens, which have been empirically determined to induce innate and adaptive immune responses, respectively. Despite almost a century of development, conventional approaches have yielded only two FDA approved immune stimulants: (1) alum, which is a combination of aluminum salts, and (2) monophosphoryl lipid A. While alum in particular has an impressive track record of safety and efficacy in infectious diseases, it is becoming increasingly clear that these agents do not appear sufficient to induce effective immune responses to combat more complex diseases, such as intracellular pathogens, cancer, allergies, and allergic diseases, among others. Efforts to develop new immunostimulants have largely been unsuccessful, primarily due to lack of efficacy or due to safety concerns.
The immune system evolved over millennia to respond to pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and helminths. Consequently, most immune cells are optimized to recognize, phagocytose, process, and then respond to motifs present on microorganisms and have receptors that are “tuned” to the ratios typically present on these organisms.
Liposomal spherical nucleic acids that function as multivalent immune modulators are provided according to aspects of the invention. The invention is based, in some aspects, on a nanostructure, comprising a liposomal core having a lipid bilayer, wherein an immune stimulant or an immune suppressor is associated with the lipid bilayer, and oligonucleotides positioned on the exterior of the liposomal core.
In some embodiments the nanostructure comprises a liposomal core having a lipid bilayer, wherein an immune stimulant or an immune suppressor is associated with the lipid bilayer, and oligonucleotides positioned on the exterior of the liposomal core, wherein the oligonucleotides form an oligonucleotide shell.
In other embodiments the nanostructure comprises a liposomal core having a lipid bilayer, wherein an immune stimulant or an immune suppressor is associated with the lipid bilayer, and oligonucleotides positioned on the exterior of the liposomal core, wherein the oligonucleotides form an oligonucleotide shell, wherein the oligonucleotide shell is comprised of at least one pattern recognition receptor modulating oligonucleotide.
In some embodiments the nanostructure comprises a liposomal core having a lipid bilayer, wherein an immune stimulant or an immune suppressor is associated with the lipid bilayer, and oligonucleotides positioned on the exterior of the liposomal core, wherein the oligonucleotides form an oligonucleotide shell, wherein the oligonucleotide shell is comprised of at least one pattern recognition receptor modulating oligonucleotide, wherein the pattern recognition receptor modulating oligonucleotide is a TLR agonist.
In other embodiments the nanostructure comprises a liposomal core having a lipid bilayer, wherein an immune stimulant or an immune suppressor is associated with the lipid bilayer, and oligonucleotides positioned on the exterior of the liposomal core, wherein the oligonucleotides form an oligonucleotide shell, wherein the oligonucleotide shell is comprised of at least one pattern recognition receptor modulating oligonucleotide, wherein the pattern recognition receptor modulating oligonucleotide is a TLR antagonist.
In other embodiments the TLR is selected from the group consisting of TLR3, TLR 7, TLR8, TLR9, and TLR13.
In some embodiments the nanostructure comprises a liposomal core having a lipid bilayer, wherein an immune stimulant or an immune suppressor is associated with the lipid bilayer, and oligonucleotides positioned on the exterior of the liposomal core, wherein the oligonucleotides form an oligonucleotide shell, wherein the oligonucleotide shell is comprised of at least one pattern recognition receptor modulating oligonucleotide, wherein the pattern recognition receptor modulating oligonucleotide is a RIG-I agonist.
In other embodiments the nanostructure comprises a liposomal core having a lipid bilayer, wherein an immune stimulant or an immune suppressor is associated with the lipid bilayer, and oligonucleotides positioned on the exterior of the liposomal core, wherein the oligonucleotides form an oligonucleotide shell, wherein the oligonucleotide shell is comprised of at least one pattern recognition receptor modulating oligonucleotide, wherein the pattern recognition receptor modulating oligonucleotide is a RIG-I antagonist.
In some embodiments the oligonucleotide shell is comprised of oligonucleotides and a carrier molecule.
In other embodiments wherein the oligonucleotide shell is comprised entirely of oligonucleotides.
In some embodiments the oligonucleotides are comprised of single-stranded or double-stranded DNA oligonucleotides.
In other embodiments the oligonucleotides are comprised of single-stranded or double-stranded RNA oligonucleotides.
In other embodiments the oligonucleotides are comprised of chimeric RNA-DNA oligonucleotides.
In another embodiment the oligonucleotides are comprised of combinations of single-stranded or double-stranded DNA, RNA, or chimeric RNA-DNA oligonucleotides.
In another embodiment the oligonucleotides of the oligonucleotide shell have structurally identical oligonucleotides.
In some embodiments the oligonucleotides of the oligonucleotide shell have at least two structurally different oligonucleotides.
In other embodiments the oligonucleotides of the oligonucleotide shell have 2-10 different nucleotide sequences.
In some embodiments the oligonucleotides have at least one phosphorothioate linkage.
In other embodiments the oligonucleotides do not have a phosphorothioate linkage.
In another embodiment the nanostructure comprises a liposomal core having a lipid bilayer, wherein an immune stimulant or an immune suppressor is associated with the lipid bilayer, and oligonucleotides positioned on the exterior of the liposomal core, wherein the oligonucleotides comprise CpG-motif containing oligonucleotides.
In some embodiments the CpG oligonucleotides are selected from the group consisting of A-class, B-class and C-class CpG oligonucleotides.
In another embodiment the nanostructure comprises a liposomal core having a lipid bilayer, wherein an immune stimulant or an immune suppressor is associated with the lipid bilayer, and oligonucleotides positioned on the exterior of the liposomal core, wherein the oligonucleotides comprise immunostimulatory single-stranded or double-stranded RNA.
In some embodiments at least one oligonucleotide has its 5′-terminus exposed to the outside surface of the nanostructure.
In other embodiments all of the oligonucleotides have their 5′-terminus exposed to the outside surface of the nanostructure.
In another embodiment the oligonucleotides are directly linked to the liposomal core.
In some embodiments the oligonucleotides are indirectly linked to the liposomal core through a linker.
In other embodiments the oligonucleotides are indirectly linked to the liposomal core through more than one linker.
In another embodiment the linker is one or more of the following linkers: tocopherols, sphingolipids such as sphingosine, sphingosine phosphate, methylated sphingosines and sphinganines, ceramides, ceramide phosphates, 1-0 acyl ceramides, dihydroceramides, 2-hydroxy ceramides, sphingomyelin, glycosylated sphingolipids, sulfatides, gangliosides, phosphosphingolipids, and phytosphingosines of various lengths and saturation states and their derivatives, phospholipids such as phosphatidylcholines, lysophosphatidylcholines, phosphatidic acids, lysophosphatidic acids, cyclic LPA, phosphatidylethanolamines, lysophosphatidylethanolamines, phosphatidylglycerols, lysophosphatidylglycerols, phosphatidylserines, lysophosphatidylserines, phosphatidylinositols, inositol phosphates, LPI, cardiolipins, lysocardiolipins, bis(monoacylglycero) phosphates, (diacylglycero) phosphates, ether lipids, diphytanyl ether lipids, and plasmalogens of various lengths, saturation states, and their derivatives, sterols such as cholesterol, desmosterol, stigmasterol, lanosterol, lathosterol, diosgenin, sitosterol, zymosterol, zymostenol, 14-demethyl-lanosterol, cholesterol sulfate, DHEA, DHEA sulfate, 14-demethyl-14-dehydrlanosterol, sitostanol, campesterol, ether anionic lipids, ether cationic lipids, lanthanide chelating lipids, A-ring substituted oxysterols, B-ring substituted oxysterols, D-ring substituted oxysterols, side-chain substituted oxysterols, double substituted oxysterols, cholestanoic acid derivatives, fluorinated sterols, fluorescent sterols, sulfonated sterols, phosphorylated sterols, polyunsaturated sterols of different lengths, saturation states, saturated C8-C22 fatty acids, saturated C8-C22 ether derivatives of glycerol, saturated and unsaturated amide derivatives of C8-C22 fatty acids and mono- and 1,2- or 1, 3-di-amino glycerols and derivatives thereof.
In another embodiment the oligonucleotides comprise 2-1,000 oligonucleotides.
In some embodiments the liposomal core is comprised of one or more lipids selected from: sphingolipids such as sphingosine, sphingosine phosphate, methylated sphingosines and sphinganines, ceramides, ceramide phosphates, 1-0 acyl ceramides, dihydroceramides, 2-hydroxy ceramides, sphingomyelin, glycosylated sphingolipids, sulfatides, gangliosides, phosphosphingolipids, and phytosphingosines of various lengths and saturation states and their derivatives, phospholipids such as phosphatidylcholines, lysophosphatidylcholines, phosphatidic acids, lysophosphatidic acids, cyclic LPA, phosphatidylethanolamines, lysophosphatidylethanolamines, phosphatidylglycerols, lysophosphatidylglycerols, phosphatidylserines, lysophosphatidylserines, phosphatidylinositols, inositol phosphates, LPI, cardiolipins, lysocardiolipins, bis(monoacylglycero) phosphates, (diacylglycero) phosphates, ether lipids, diphytanyl ether lipids, and plasmalogens of various lengths, saturation states, and their derivatives, sterols such as cholesterol, desmosterol, stigmasterol, lanosterol, lathosterol, diosgenin, sitosterol, zymosterol, zymostenol, 14-demethyl-lanosterol, cholesterol sulfate, DHEA, DHEA sulfate, 14-demethyl-14-dehydrlanosterol, sitostanol, campesterol, ether anionic lipids, ether cationic lipids, lanthanide chelating lipids, A-ring substituted oxysterols, B-ring substituted oxysterols, D-ring substituted oxysterols, side-chain substituted oxysterols, double substituted oxysterols, cholestanoic acid derivatives, fluorinated sterols, fluorescent sterols, sulfonated sterols, phosphorylated sterols, and polyunsaturated sterols of different lengths, saturation states, saturated C8-C22 fatty acids, saturated C8-C22 ether derivatives of glycerol, and saturated and unsaturated amide derivatives of C8-C22 fatty acids and mono- and 1,2- or 1, 3-di-amino glycerols and derivatives thereof.
In another embodiment the liposomal core is comprised of one type of lipid.
In some embodiments the liposomal core is comprised of 2-10 different lipids.
In other embodiments wherein the immune stimulant is selected from the group consisting of monophosphoryl lipid A, lipid A from bacterial origin, 22:0 trehalose, dimethyldioctadecyl-ammonium, Kdo2 lipid A, inositol phosphates including IP3(1,3,4), IP3(1,3,5), IP3(1,4,5), IPR(1,3,4,5), LPA/S1P receptor selective agonists, PAF and PAF analogs, liponucleotides, cyclic LPA, bioactive ceramides, endocannabinoids, anandamides, lipid oxidation products, diacylglycerol phosphate, bacterial membrane lipids, N-acylglycine lipids, acyl carnitine lipids, mycolic acids, plant lipid extracts, FSL-1, PAM3CSK4, HKLM, LPS, FLA-ST, imiquimod, resiquimod, C12-IE-DAP, L18-MDP toll like receptor agonists, NOD receptor agonists, and pro-inflammatory immune receptor agonists.
In another embodiment the nanostructure further comprises an antigen.
In some embodiments the antigen is mixed together with the nanostructure.
In other embodiments the antigen is linked directly to the oligonucleotide shell.
In some embodiments the antigen is linked indirectly to the oligonucleotide shell through a linker.
In other embodiments the antigen is linked directly to the liposomal core.
In yet another embodiment the antigen is linked indirectly to the liposomal core through a linker.
In another embodiment wherein an antigen-oligonucleotide conjugate is linked to the liposomal core through oligonucleotide hybridization.
In some embodiments the nanostructure comprises a liposomal core having a lipid bilayer, wherein an immune stimulant or an immune suppressor is associated with the lipid bilayer, and oligonucleotides positioned on the exterior of the liposomal core, wherein the immune stimulant is associated with the liposomal core by being embedded within the liposomal core.
In other embodiments the nanostructure comprises a liposomal core having a lipid bilayer, wherein an immune stimulant or an immune suppressor is associated with the lipid bilayer, and oligonucleotides positioned on the exterior of the liposomal core, wherein the immune stimulant is associated with the liposomal core by being linked indirectly to the liposomal core.
In some embodiments the nanostructure comprises a liposomal core having a lipid bilayer, wherein an immune stimulant or an immune suppressor is associated with the lipid bilayer, and oligonucleotides positioned on the exterior of the liposomal core, wherein the immune stimulant is associated with the liposomal core by being linked directly to the liposomal core.
In some embodiments the nanostructure comprises a liposomal core having a lipid bilayer, wherein an immune stimulant or an immune suppressor is associated with the lipid bilayer, and oligonucleotides positioned on the exterior of the liposomal core, wherein the oligonucleotides form an oligonucleotide shell, wherein the oligonucleotides of the oligonucleotide shell are oriented radially outwards.
In other embodiments the linker is selected from the group consisting of tocopherols, sphingolipids such as sphingosine, sphingosine phosphate, methylated sphingosines and sphinganines, ceramides, ceramide phosphates, 1-0 acyl ceramides, dihydroceramides, 2-hydroxy ceramides, sphingomyelin, glycosylated sphingolipids, sulfatides, gangliosides, phosphosphingolipids, and phytosphingosines of various lengths and saturation states and their derivatives, phospholipids such as phosphatidylcholines, lysophosphatidylcholines, phosphatidic acids, lysophosphatidic acids, cyclic LPA, phosphatidylethanolamines, lysophosphatidylethanolamines, phosphatidylglycerols, lysophosphatidylglycerols, phosphatidylserines, lysophosphatidylserines, phosphatidylinositols, inositol phosphates, LPI, cardiolipins, lysocardiolipins, bis(monoacylglycero) phosphates, (diacylglycero) phosphates, ether lipids, diphytanyl ether lipids, and plasmalogens of various lengths, saturation states, and their derivatives, sterols such as cholesterol, desmosterol, stigmasterol, lanosterol, lathosterol, diosgenin, sitosterol, zymosterol, zymostenol, 14-demethyl-lanosterol, cholesterol sulfate, DHEA, DHEA sulfate, 14-demethyl-14-dehydrlanosterol, sitostanol, campesterol, ether anionic lipids, ether cationic lipids, lanthanide chelating lipids, A-ring substituted oxysterols, B-ring substituted oxysterols, D-ring substituted oxysterols, side-chain substituted oxysterols, double substituted oxysterols, cholestanoic acid derivatives, fluorinated sterols, fluorescent sterols, sulfonated sterols, phosphorylated sterols, and polyunsaturated sterols of different lengths, saturation states, saturated C8-C22 fatty acids, saturated C8-C22 ether derivatives of glycerol, saturated and unsaturated amide derivatives of C8-C22 fatty acids and mono- and 1,2- or 1, 3-di-amino glycerols, and derivatives thereof.
In some embodiments the antigen is encapsulated within the liposomal core in an inner aqueous layer.
In other embodiments the antigen is attached non-covalently to the oligonucleotide of the oligonucleotide shell.
In other embodiments the antigen is selected from the group consisting of a cancer antigen, a bacterial antigen, a viral antigen, a parasitic antigen, a hapten, and an allergen.
In some embodiments the nanostructure is a self-assembling nanostructure.
Another aspect of the invention comprises a method for treating a subject, comprising administering to a subject a nucleic acid nanostructure in an effective amount to promote an immune response.
In one embodiment the subject has a disorder and wherein the method is a method for treating the disorder.
In another embodiment the disorder is cancer.
In some embodiments the disorder is infectious disease.
In other embodiments the infectious disease is a viral infection.
In some embodiments the infectious disease is a bacterial infection.
In another embodiment the disorder is allergy.
In some embodiments the disorder is asthma.
In another embodiment the disorder is autoimmune disease.
In some embodiments further comprising administering a therapeutic protocol to the subject.
In another embodiment the therapeutic protocol is surgery.
In some embodiments the therapeutic protocol is radiation.
In other embodiments the therapeutic protocol is a medicament.
In one embodiment the method further comprises administering an adjuvant.
In one embodiment the subject has a disorder and wherein the method is a method for treating the disorder, wherein the nanostructure is associated with a targeting molecule.
In one embodiment the subject has a disorder and wherein the method is a method for treating the disorder, wherein the nanostructure is delivered by a route selected from the group consisting of oral, nasal, sublingual, intravenous, subcutaneous, mucosal, respiratory, direct injection, enema, and dermally.
In another aspect the composition for use in the treatment of disease comprises the nucleic acid nanostructure and embodiments thereof.
Each of the limitations of the invention can encompass various embodiments of the invention. It is, therefore, anticipated that each of the limitations of the invention involving any one element or combinations of elements can be included in each aspect of the invention. This invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying Detailed Description, Examples, Claims, and Figures. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and from the claims.
The accompanying drawings are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the drawings, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in various figures is represented by a like numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every drawing. In the drawings:
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a family of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that trigger activation of innate immune cells, promoting their effector functions and bridging innate and adaptive immunity. Agents that stimulate TLRs are being investigated extensively as potential therapeutic and prophylactic compounds due to the central role these receptors play in coordinating immune responses. Similar to the way that multiple TLRs and immune receptors are stimulated when an immune cell processes a pathogen, it has been shown that stimulation of multiple TLRs with multiple compounds can yield greater efficacy. However, effectively delivering multiple TLR agonists in combination can be quite difficult for a number of reasons: (1) synergy is often observed only in a narrow window of fixed concentration ratios between the two compounds, due to their typically different IC50 or EC50 values, (2) different physicochemical properties such as different size, charge, and hydrophobicity can make attaching them to each other difficult or make them have drastically different PK/PD/ADME properties, (3) the toxic levels of the compounds tend to be different, and (4) the target receptors of one or more of the different compounds may be inaccessible, such as the cytosol, or located in a degradative compartment, such as endosomes or lysosomes.
A novel class of nanostructures having unexpectedly high immune modulating activity have been developed according to the invention. These nanostructures are supra-molecular assemblies, which are immune-modulating liposomal spherical nucleic acids (sometimes referred to as SNAs). These nanostructures can deliver combinations of immune modulating materials in a highly spatiotemporally controlled manner to cells (Examples are shown in
In addition to the above, a method for achieving co-delivery of antigen with the multivalent immune-modulating structures was also developed (Examples are depicted in
Currently, methods used in the clinic to induce immunologic effects generally fall into two categories: 1) compounds that activate or potentiate immune responses, such as vaccines and adjuvants, small molecule agonists of toll-like receptors such as imiquimod and resiquimod, or oligonucleotides such as ISS 1018 (Dynavax Technologies Corporation), among several others, and 2) compounds that act to reduce unwanted immune responses, such as corticosteroids, cyclosporine, and tacrolimus. These compounds have significant limitations known to those in the art.
In general, immune stimulation attempts in the prior art have been limited by a lack of ability to activate robust cellular immune responses to target antigen, leading to failures to develop efficacious and cost-effective vaccines for various infectious diseases, such as HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, dengue, chlamydia, and others. Similarly, various experimental vaccine compounds for cancer have failed to reach their primary end point in late stage clinical trials. A key challenge that does not yet appear to be satisfactorily met is a formulation of antigen and immune stimulant that can achieve superior results. The nanostructure of the invention achieved these goals, producing activation of strong cellular responses to antigen in vivo with evidence of significant (95%) reduction of tumor burden (
The nanostructure of the invention include: (1) a liposomal core having a lipid bilayer, which contains an immune stimulant embedded in or attached to the lipid bilayer, and (2) a layer of oligonucleotides, which may be an oligonucleotide shell, and which have dual function in that they help to target the nanostructure to immune cells and also act to stimulate immune receptors that can recognize nucleic acids (
The nanostructure of the invention includes a liposomal core. A liposomal core as used herein refers to a centrally located core compartment formed by a component of the lipids or phospholipids that form a lipid bilayer. “Liposomes” are artificial, self closed vesicular structure of various sizes and structures, where one or several membranes encapsulate an aqueous core. Most typically liposome membranes are formed from lipid bilayers membranes, where the hydrophilic head groups are oriented towards the aqueous environment and the lipid chains are embedded in the lipophilic core. Liposomes can be formed as well from other amphiphilic monomeric and polymeric molecules, such as polymers, like block copolymers, or polypeptides. Unilamellar vesicles are liposomes defined by a single membrane enclosing an aqueous space. In contrast, oligo- or multilamellar vesicles are built up of several membranes. Typically, the membranes are roughly 4 nm thick and are composed of amphiphilic lipids, such as phospholipids, of natural or synthetic origin. Optionally, the membrane properties can be modified by the incorporation of other lipids such as sterols or cholic acid derivatives.
The lipid bilayer is composed of two layers of lipid molecules. Each lipid molecule in a layer is oriented substantially parallel to adjacent lipid bilayers, and two layers that form a bilayer have the polar ends of their molecules exposed to the aqueous phase and the non-polar ends adjacent to each other, as shown in the diagrams of
“Lipid” refers to its conventional sense as a generic term encompassing fats, lipids, alcohol-ether-soluble constituents of protoplasm, which are insoluble in water. Lipids usually consist of a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic moiety. In water lipids can self organize to form bilayers membranes, where the hydrophilic moieties (head groups) are oriented towards the aqueous phase, and the lipophilic moieties (acyl chains) are embedded in the bilayers core. Lipids can comprise as well two hydrophilic moieties (bola amphiphiles). In that case, membranes may be formed from a single lipid layer, and not a bilayer. Typical examples for lipids in the current context are fats, fatty oils, essential oils, waxes, steroid, sterols, phospholipids, glycolipids, sulpholipids, aminolipids, chromolipids, and fatty acids. The term encompasses both naturally occurring and synthetic lipids. Preferred lipids in connection with the present invention are: steroids and sterol, particularly cholesterol, phospholipids, including phosphatidyl, phosphatidylcholines and phosphatidylethanolamines and sphingomyelins. Where there are fatty acids, they could be about 12-24 carbon chains in length, containing up to 6 double bonds. The fatty acids are linked to the backbone, which may be derived from glycerol. The fatty acids within one lipid can be different (asymmetric), or there may be only 1 fatty acid chain present, e.g. lysolecithins. Mixed formulations are also possible, particularly when the non-cationic lipids are derived from natural sources, such as lecithins (phosphatidylcholines) purified from egg yolk, bovine heart, brain, liver or soybean.
The liposomal core can be constructed from one or more lipids known to those in the art including but not limited to: sphingolipids such as sphingosine, sphingosine phosphate, methylated sphingosines and sphinganines, ceramides, ceramide phosphates, 1-0 acyl ceramides, dihydroceramides, 2-hydroxy ceramides, sphingomyelin, glycosylated sphingolipids, sulfatides, gangliosides, phosphosphingolipids, and phytosphingosines of various lengths and saturation states and their derivatives, phospholipids such as phosphatidylcholines, lysophosphatidylcholines, phosphatidic acids, lysophosphatidic acids, cyclic LPA, phosphatidylethanolamines, lysophosphatidylethanolamines, phosphatidylglycerols, lysophosphatidylglycerols, phosphatidylserines, lysophosphatidylserines, phosphatidylinositols, inositol phosphates, LPI, cardiolipins, lysocardiolipins, bis(monoacylglycero) phosphates, (diacylglycero) phosphates, ether lipids, diphytanyl ether lipids, and plasmalogens of various lengths, saturation states, and their derivatives, sterols such as cholesterol, desmosterol, stigmasterol, lanosterol, lathosterol, diosgenin, sitosterol, zymosterol, zymostenol, 14-demethyl-lanosterol, cholesterol sulfate, DHEA, DHEA sulfate, 14-demethyl-14-dehydrlanosterol, sitostanol, campesterol, ether anionic lipids, ether cationic lipids, lanthanide chelating lipids, A-ring substituted oxysterols, B-ring substituted oxysterols, D-ring substituted oxysterols, side-chain substituted oxysterols, double substituted oxysterols, cholestanoic acid derivatives, fluorinated sterols, fluorescent sterols, sulfonated sterols, phosphorylated sterols, and polyunsaturated sterols of different lengths, saturation states, and their derivatives.
An immune stimulant is associated with the lipid bilayer of the liposomal core. An immune stimulant, as used herein, is a substance that causes stimulation of the immune system such that one or more immune factors, i.e., cytokines, immune cells, antibodies, chemokines are induced or activated. The immune response may comprise a cellular and/or a humoral response. The immune stimulant can be, for example, a small molecule, a nucleic acid, a protein, or a combination thereof. The immune stimulant may also be capable of activating expression of immune stimulatory molecules on cells of a localized microenvironment.
The immune stimulant incorporated into the bilayer can be a wide variety of molecules including but not limited to: monophosphoryl lipid A, lipid A from bacterial origin, 22:0 trehalose, dimethyldioctadecyl-ammonium, Kdo2 lipid A, inositol phosphates including IP3(1,3,4), IP3(1,3,5), IP3(1,4,5), IPR(1,3,4,5), LPA/S1P receptor selective agonists, PAF and PAF analogs, liponucleotides, cyclic LPA, bioactive ceramides, endocannabinoids, anandamides, lipid oxidation products, diacylglycerol phosphate, bacterial membrane lipids, N-acylglycine lipids, acyl carnitine lipids, mycolic acids, plant lipid extracts, FSL-1, PAM3CSK4, HKLM, LPS, FLA-ST, imiquimod, resiquimod, C12-IE-DAP, L18-MDP and other compounds known to those in the art that can stimulate toll like receptors, NOD receptors, and other pro-inflammatory immune receptors that would be productive towards inducing an immune response.
The immune stimulant is associated with the liposomal core. It may be associated with by being embedded within the core or it may be attached or linked, either indirectly (i.e. non-covalently or covalently through other molecules such a linkers) or directly (i.e. covalently).
The nanostructure of the invention also includes an oligonucleotide which is preferably a therapeutic oligonucleotide. An oligonucleotide, as used herein, refers to any nucleic acid containing molecule. The nucleic acid may be DNA, RNA, PNA, LNA, ENA or combinations or modifications thereof. It may also be single, double or triple stranded. A therapeutic oligonucleotide is an oligonucleotide that can function as a therapeutic and or diagnostic agent.
The oligonucleotides are positioned on the exterior of the liposomal core. At least one oligonucleotide is on the exterior. In some embodiments at least 25, 50, 75, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 or 1,000 oligonucleotides or any range combination thereof are on the exterior of the liposomal core. In some embodiments, 1-1000, 10-500, 50-250, or 50-300 oligonucleotides are present on the surface. In some instance the oligonucleotides form an oligonucleotide shell. An oligonucleotide shell is formed when at least 50% of the available surface area of the exterior surface of the liposomal includes an oligonucleotide. In some embodiments at least 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97% 98% or 99% of the available surface area of the exterior surface of the liposomal includes an oligonucleotide. The oligonucleotides of the oligonucleotide shell may be oriented in a variety of directions. In some embodiments the oligonucleotides are oriented radially outwards.
The oligonucleotides may be linked to the core or to one another and/or to other molecules such an antigens either directly or indirectly through a linker. The oligonucleotides may be conjugated to a linker via the 5′ end or the 3′ end. E.g. [Sequence, 5′-3′]-Linker or Linker-[Sequence, 5′-3′]. Some or all of the oligonucleotides of the nanostructure may be linked to one another either directly or indirectly through a covalent or non-covalent linkage. The linkage of one oligonucleotide to another oligonucleotide may be in addition to or alternatively to the linkage of that oligonucleotide to liposomal core. One or more of the oligonucleotides may also be linked to other molecules such as an antigen. The oligonucleotides may be linked to the antigen of the core either directly or indirectly through a covalent or non-covalent linkage.
The oligonucleotide shell can be a wide variety of molecules including but not limited to: single-stranded deoxyribonucleotides, ribonucleotides, and other single-stranded oligonucleotides incorporating one or a multiplicity of modifications known to those in the art, double-stranded deoxyribonucleotides, ribonucleotides, and other double-stranded oligonucleotides incorporating one or a multiplicity of modifications known to those in the art, oligonucleotide triplexes incorporating deoxyribonucleotides, ribonucleotides, or oligonucleotides that incorporate one or a multiplicity of modifications known to those in the art. In another embodiment one or a multiplicity of different oligonucleotides are present on the same surface of a single liposomal nanostructure.
The oligonucleotide shell may be anchored to the surface of the liposomal core through conjugation to one or a multiplicity of linker molecules including but not limited to: tocopherols, sphingolipids such as sphingosine, sphingosine phosphate, methylated sphingosines and sphinganines, ceramides, ceramide phosphates, 1-0 acyl ceramides, dihydroceramides, 2-hydroxy ceramides, sphingomyelin, glycosylated sphingolipids, sulfatides, gangliosides, phosphosphingolipids, and phytosphingosines of various lengths and saturation states and their derivatives, phospholipids such as phosphatidylcholines, lysophosphatidylcholines, phosphatidic acids, lysophosphatidic acids, cyclic LPA, phosphatidylethanolamines, lysophosphatidylethanolamines, phosphatidylglycerols, lysophosphatidylglycerols, phosphatidylserines, lysophosphatidylserines, phosphatidylinositols, inositol phosphates, LPI, cardiolipins, lysocardiolipins, bis(monoacylglycero) phosphates, (diacylglycero) phosphates, ether lipids, diphytanyl ether lipids, and plasmalogens of various lengths, saturation states, and their derivatives, sterols such as cholesterol, desmosterol, stigmasterol, lanosterol, lathosterol, diosgenin, sitosterol, zymosterol, zymostenol, 14-demethyl-lanosterol, cholesterol sulfate, DHEA, DHEA sulfate, 14-demethyl-14-dehydrlanosterol, sitostanol, campesterol, ether anionic lipids, ether cationic lipids, lanthanide chelating lipids, A-ring substituted oxysterols, B-ring substituted oxysterols, D-ring substituted oxysterols, side-chain substituted oxysterols, double substituted oxysterols, cholestanoic acid derivatives, fluorinated sterols, fluorescent sterols, sulfonated sterols, phosphorylated sterols, and polyunsaturated sterols of different lengths, saturation states, and their derivatives. The oligonucleotide may be a nucleic acid that interacts with a molecule or complex of molecules that when stimulated produce an immune response in response to that interaction. The molecule or complex of molecules may be a receptor. In some embodiments the oligonucleotide may be a pattern recognition receptor (PRR) modulating oligonucleotide. PRRs are a primitive part of the immune system composed of proteins expressed by cells of the innate immune system to identify pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which are associated with microbial pathogens or cellular stress, as well as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which are associated with cell components released during cell damage. PRRs include but are not limited to membrane-bound PRRs, such as receptor kinases, toll-like receptors (TLR), and C-type lectin Receptors (CLR) (mannose receptors and asialoglycoprotein receptors); Cytoplasmic PRRs such as RIG-I-like receptors (RLR), RNA Helicases, Plant PRRs, and NonRD kinases; and secreted PRRs. PRR modulating oligonucleotides include but are not limited to TLR agonists, agonists or antagonists of RIG-I, transcription factors, cellular translation machinery, cellular transcription machinery, nucleic-acid acting enzymes, and nucleic acid associating autoantigens. One example of this embodiment is the use of unmethylated 5′-cytosine-phosphate-guanosine-3′ (CpG) motifs. Another is the use of 5′-UUG-3′ or 5′-UUA-3′ motifs. Still another is the use of long double stranded RNA.
A TLR agonist, as used herein is a nucleic acid molecule that interacts with and stimulates the activity of a TLR. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a family of highly conserved polypeptides that play a critical role in innate immunity in mammals. At least ten family members, designated TLR1-TLR10, have been identified. The cytoplasmic domains of the various TLRs are characterized by a Toll-interleukin 1 (IL-1) receptor (TIR) domain. Medzhitov R et al. (1998) Mol Cell 2:253-8. Recognition of microbial invasion by TLRs triggers activation of a signaling cascade that is evolutionarily conserved in Drosophila and mammals. The TIR domain-containing adaptor protein MyD88 has been reported to associate with TLRs and to recruit IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) to the TLRs. The MyD88-dependent signaling pathway is believed to lead to activation of NF-κB transcription factors and c-Jun NH2 terminal kinase (Jnk) mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), critical steps in immune activation and production of inflammatory cytokines. For a review, see Aderem A et al. (2000) Nature 406:782-87.
TLRs are believed to be differentially expressed in various tissues and on various types of immune cells. For example, human TLR7 has been reported to be expressed in placenta, lung, spleen, lymph nodes, tonsil and on plasmacytoid precursor dendritic cells (pDCs). Chuang T-H et al. (2000) Eur Cytokine Netw 11:372-8); Kadowaki N et al. (2001) J Exp Med 194:863-9. Human TLR8 has been reported to be expressed in lung, peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL), placenta, spleen, lymph nodes, and on monocytes. Kadowaki N et al. (2001) J Exp Med 194:863-9; Chuang T-H et al. (2000) Eur Cytokine Netw 11:372-8. Human TLR9 is reportedly expressed in spleen, lymph nodes, bone marrow, PBL, and on pDCs, and B cells. Kadowaki N et al. (2001) J Exp Med 194:863-9; Bauer S et al. (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:9237-42; Chuang T-H et al. (2000) Eur Cytokine Netw 11:372-8.
Nucleotide and amino acid sequences of human and murine TLR7 are known. See, for example, GenBank Accession Nos. AF240467, AF245702, NM_016562, AF334942, NM_133211; and AAF60188, AAF78035, NP_057646, AAL73191, and AAL73192, the contents of all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Human TLR7 is reported to be 1049 amino acids long. Murine TLR7 is reported to be 1050 amino acids long. TLR7 polypeptides include an extracellular domain having a leucine-rich repeat region, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular domain that includes a TIR domain.
Nucleotide and amino acid sequences of human and murine TLR8 are known. See, for example, GenBank Accession Nos. AF246971, AF245703, NM_016610, XM_045706, AY035890, NM_133212; and AAF64061, AAF78036, NP_057694, XP_045706, AAK62677, and NP_573475, the contents of all of which is incorporated herein by reference. Human TLR8 is reported to exist in at least two isoforms, one 1041 amino acids long and the other 1059 amino acids long. Murine TLR8 is 1032 amino acids long. TLR8 polypeptides include an extracellular domain having a leucine-rich repeat region, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular domain that includes a TIR domain.
Nucleotide and amino acid sequences of human and murine TLR9 are known. See, for example, GenBank Accession Nos. NM_017442, AF259262, AB045180, AF245704, AB045181, AF348140, AF314224, NM_031178; and NP_059138, AAF72189, BAB19259, AAF78037, BAB19260, AAK29625, AAK28488, and NP_112455, the contents of all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Human TLR9 is reported to exist in at least two isoforms, one 1032 amino acids long and the other 1055 amino acids. Murine TLR9 is 1032 amino acids long. TLR9 polypeptides include an extracellular domain having a leucine-rich repeat region, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular domain that includes a TIR domain.
As used herein, the term “TLR signaling” refers to any aspect of intracellular signaling associated with signaling through a TLR. As used herein, the term “TLR-mediated immune response” refers to the immune response that is associated with TLR signaling. The level of TLR signaling may be enhanced over a pre-existing level of signaling or it may be induced over a background level of signaling.
A TLR3-mediated immune response is a response associated with TLR3 signaling. TLR3 agonists include but are not limited to dsRNA such as dsRNA having multiple AU motifs.
A TLR7-mediated immune response is a response associated with TLR7 signaling. TLR7-mediated immune response is generally characterized by the induction of IFN-α and IFN-inducible cytokines such as IP-10 and I-TAC. The levels of cytokines IL-1 α/β, IL-6, IL-8, MIP-1α/β and MIP-3a/(3 induced in a TLR7-mediated immune response are less than those induced in a TLR8-mediated immune response. TLR7 ligands include, without limitation, guanosine analogues such as C8-substituted guanosines, mixtures of ribonucleosides consisting essentially of G and U, guanosine ribonucleotides and RNA or RNA-like molecules (PCT/US03/10406), and adenosine-based compounds (e.g., 6-amino-9-benzyl-2-(3-hydroxy-propoxy)-9H-purin-8-ol, and similar compounds made by Sumitomo (e.g., CL-029)).
As used herein, the term “guanosine analogues” refers to a guanosine-like nucleotide (excluding guanosine) having a chemical modification involving the guanine base, guanosine nucleoside sugar, or both the guanine base and the guanosine nucleoside sugar. Guanosine analogues specifically include, without limitation, 7-deaza-guanosine.
Guanosine analogues further include C8-substituted guanosines such as 7-thia-8-oxoguanosine (immunosine), 8-mercaptoguanosine, 8-bromoguanosine, 8-methylguanosine, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanosine, C8-arylamino-2′-deoxyguanosine, C8-propynyl-guanosine, C8- and N7-substituted guanine ribonucleosides such as 7-allyl-8-oxoguanosine (loxoribine) and 7-methyl-8-oxoguanosine, 8-aminoguanosine, 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, 8-hydroxyguanosine, and 7-deaza 8-substituted guanosine.
A TLR8-mediated immune response is a response associated with TLR8 signaling. This response is further characterized by the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ, IL-12p40/70, TNF-α, IL-1α/β, IL-6, IL-8, MIP-1 α/β and MIP-3 α/β. TLR8 ligands include mixtures of ribonucleosides consisting essentially of G and U, guanosine ribonucleotides and RNA or RNA-like molecules (PCT/US03/10406). Additional TLR8 ligands are also disclosed in Gorden et al. J. Immunol. 2005, 174:1259-1268).
As used herein, a “TLR7/8 agonist” collectively refers to any nucleic acid that is capable of increasing TLR7 and/or TLR8 signaling (i.e., an agonist of TLR7 and/or TLR8). Some TLR7/8 ligands induce TLR7 signaling alone (e.g., TLR7 specific agonists), some induce TLR8 signaling alone (e.g., TLR8 specific agonists), and others induce both TLR7 and TLR8 signaling.
A TLR9-mediated immune response is a response associated with TLR9 signaling. This response is further characterized at least by the production/secretion of IFN-γ and IL-12, albeit at levels lower than are achieved via a TLR8-mediated immune response. As used herein, the term “TLR9 agonist” refers to any agent that is capable of increasing TLR9 signaling (i.e., an agonist of TLR9). TLR9 agonists specifically include, without limitation, immunostimulatory nucleic acids, and in particular CpG immunostimulatory nucleic acids.
“Immunostimulatory CpG nucleic acids” or “immunostimulatory CpG oligonucleotides” refers to any CpG-containing nucleic acid that is capable of activating an immune cell. At least the C of the CpG dinucleotide is typically, but not necessarily, unmethylated. Immunostimulatory CpG nucleic acids are described in a number of issued patents and published patent applications, including U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,194,388; 6,207,646; 6,218,371; 6,239,116; 6,339,068; 6,406,705; and 6,429,199.
A TLR13-mediated immune response is a response associated with TLR13 signaling. A TLR13 agonist is bacterial 23S rRNA.
The oligonucleotides may also be retinoic acid inducible gene-I (RIG-I) agonists or antagonists. RIG-I corresponds to GenBank Accession No. AF038963. RIG-I agonists include but are not limited to dsRNA such as Poly(I:C). RIG-I antagonists include short 5′triphosphate DNA or RNA.
An “immunostimulatory oligonucleotide” is any nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) containing an immunostimulatory motif or backbone that is capable of inducing an immune response. An induction of an immune response refers to any increase in number or activity of an immune cell, or an increase in expression or absolute levels of an immune factor, such as a cytokine. Immune cells include, but are not limited to, NK cells, CD4+T lymphocytes, CD8+T lymphocytes, B cells, dendritic cells, macrophage and other antigen-presenting cells. Cytokines include, but are not limited to, interleukins, TNF-α, IFN-α,β and γ, Flt-ligand, and co-stimulatory molecules. Immunostimulatory motifs include, but are not limited to CpG motifs and T-rich motifs.
A non-limiting set of immunostimulatory oligonucleotides includes:
The terms “oligonucleotide” and “nucleic acid” are used interchangeably to mean multiple nucleotides (i.e., molecules comprising a sugar (e.g., ribose or deoxyribose) linked to a phosphate group and to an exchangeable organic base, which is either a substituted pyrimidine (e.g., cytosine (C), thymidine (T) or uracil (U)) or a substituted purine (e.g., adenine (A) or guanine (G)). Thus, the term embraces both DNA and RNA oligonucleotides. The terms shall also include oligonucleosides (i.e., a oligonucleotide minus the phosphate) and any other organic base containing polymer. Oligonucleotides can be obtained from existing nucleic acid sources (e.g., genomic or cDNA), but are preferably synthetic (e.g., produced by nucleic acid synthesis). The oligonucleotides may be single stranded or double stranded. A double stranded oligonucleotide is also referred to herein as a duplex. Double-stranded oligonucleotides of the invention can comprise two separate complementary nucleic acid strands.
As used herein, “duplex” includes a double-stranded nucleic acid molecule(s) in which complementary sequences or partially complementary sequences are hydrogen bonded to each other. The complementary sequences can include a sense strand and an antisense strand. The antisense nucleotide sequence can be identical or sufficiently identical to the target gene to mediate effective target gene inhibition (e.g., at least about 98% identical, 96% identical, 94%, 90% identical, 85% identical, or 80% identical) to the target gene sequence.
A double-stranded oligonucleotide can be double-stranded over its entire length, meaning it has no overhanging single-stranded sequences and is thus blunt-ended. In other embodiments, the two strands of the double-stranded oligonucleotide can have different lengths producing one or more single-stranded overhangs. A double-stranded oligonucleotide of the invention can contain mismatches and/or loops or bulges. In some embodiments, it is double-stranded over at least about 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% of the length of the oligonucleotide. In some embodiments, the double-stranded oligonucleotide of the invention contains at least or up to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, or 15 mismatches.
Oligonucleotides associated with the invention can be modified such as at the sugar moiety, the phosphodiester linkage, and/or the base. As used herein, “sugar moieties” includes natural, unmodified sugars, including pentose, ribose and deoxyribose, modified sugars and sugar analogs. Modifications of sugar moieties can include replacement of a hydroxyl group with a halogen, a heteroatom, or an aliphatic group, and can include functionalization of the hydroxyl group as, for example, an ether, amine or thiol.
Modification of sugar moieties can include 2′-O-methyl nucleotides, which are referred to as “methylated.” In some instances, oligonucleotides associated with the invention may only contain modified or unmodified sugar moieties, while in other instances, oligonucleotides contain some sugar moieties that are modified and some that are not.
In some instances, modified nucleomonomers include sugar- or backbone-modified ribonucleotides. Modified ribonucleotides can contain a non-naturally occurring base such as uridines or cytidines modified at the 5′-position, e.g., 5′-(2-amino)propyl uridine and 5′-bromo uridine; adenosines and guanosines modified at the 8-position, e.g., 8-bromo guanosine; deaza nucleotides, e.g., 7-deaza-adenosine; and N-alkylated nucleotides, e.g., N6-methyl adenosine. Also, sugar-modified ribonucleotides can have the 2′-OH group replaced by an H, alkoxy (or OR), R or alkyl, halogen, SH, SR, amino (such as NH2, NHR, NR2,), or CN group, wherein R is lower alkyl, alkenyl, or alkynyl. In some embodiments, modified ribonucleotides can have the phosphodiester group connecting to adjacent ribonucleotides replaced by a modified group, such as a phosphorothioate group.
In some aspects, 2′-O-methyl modifications can be beneficial for reducing undesirable cellular stress responses, such as the interferon response to double-stranded nucleic acids. Modified sugars can include D-ribose, 2′-O-alkyl (including 2′-O-methyl and 2′-O-ethyl), i.e., 2′-alkoxy, 2′-amino, 2′-S-alkyl, 2′-halo (including 2′-fluoro), 2′-methoxyethoxy, 2′-allyloxy (—OCH2CH═CH2), 2′-propargyl, 2′-propyl, ethynyl, ethenyl, propenyl, and cyano and the like. The sugar moiety can also be a hexose.
The term “alkyl” includes saturated aliphatic groups, including straight-chain alkyl groups (e.g., methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, hexyl, heptyl, octyl, nonyl, decyl, etc.), branched-chain alkyl groups (isopropyl, tert-butyl, isobutyl, etc.), cycloalkyl (alicyclic) groups (cyclopropyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, cycloheptyl, cyclooctyl), alkyl substituted cycloalkyl groups, and cycloalkyl substituted alkyl groups. In some embodiments, a straight chain or branched chain alkyl has 6 or fewer carbon atoms in its backbone (e.g., C1-C6 for straight chain, C3-C6 for branched chain), and more preferably 4 or fewer. Likewise, preferred cycloalkyls have from 3-8 carbon atoms in their ring structure, and more preferably have 5 or 6 carbons in the ring structure. The term C1-C6 includes alkyl groups containing 1 to 6 carbon atoms.
Unless otherwise specified, the term alkyl includes both “unsubstituted alkyls” and “substituted alkyls,” the latter of which refers to alkyl moieties having independently selected substituents replacing a hydrogen on one or more carbons of the hydrocarbon backbone. The term “alkenyl” includes unsaturated aliphatic groups analogous in length and possible substitution to the alkyls described above, but that contain at least one double bond. Unless otherwise specified, the term alkenyl includes both “unsubstituted alkenyls” and “substituted alkenyls,” the latter of which refers to alkenyl moieties having independently selected substituents replacing a hydrogen on one or more carbons of the hydrocarbon backbone.
The term “base” includes the known purine and pyrimidine heterocyclic bases, deazapurines, and analogs (including heterocyclic substituted analogs, e.g., aminoethyoxy phenoxazine), derivatives (e.g., 1-alkyl-, 1-alkenyl-, heteroaromatic- and 1-alkynyl derivatives) and tautomers thereof. Examples of purines include adenine, guanine, inosine, diaminopurine, and xanthine and analogs (e.g., 8-oxo-N6-methyladenine or 7-diazaxanthine) and derivatives thereof. Pyrimidines include, for example, thymine, uracil, and cytosine, and their analogs (e.g., 5-methylcytosine, 5-methyluracil, 5-(1-propynyl)uracil, 5-(1-propynyl)cytosine and 4,4-ethanocytosine). Other examples of suitable bases include non-purinyl and non-pyrimidinyl bases such as 2-aminopyridine and triazines.
In some aspects, the nucleomonomers of a oligonucleotide of the invention are RNA nucleotides, including modified RNA nucleotides.
The term “nucleoside” includes bases which are covalently attached to a sugar moiety, preferably ribose or deoxyribose. Examples of preferred nucleosides include ribonucleosides and deoxyribonucleosides. Nucleosides also include bases linked to amino acids or amino acid analogs which may comprise free carboxyl groups, free amino groups, or protecting groups. Suitable protecting groups are well known in the art (see P. G. M. Wuts and T. W. Greene, “Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis”, 2nd Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1999).
As used herein, the term “linkage” used in the context of an internucleotide linkage includes a naturally occurring, unmodified phosphodiester moiety (—O—(PO2−)—O—) that covalently couples adjacent nucleomonomers. As used herein, the term “substitute linkage” or “modified linkage” or modified internucleotide linkage” includes any analog or derivative of the native phosphodiester group that covalently couples adjacent nucleomonomers. Substitute linkages include phosphodiester analogs, e.g., phosphorothioate, phosphorodithioate, and P-ethyoxyphosphodiester, P-ethoxyphosphodiester, P-alkyloxyphosphotriester, methylphosphonate, and nonphosphorus containing linkages, e.g., acetals and amides. Such substitute linkages are known in the art (e.g., Bjergarde et al. 1991. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:5843; Caruthers et al. 1991. Nucleosides Nucleotides. 10:47). In certain embodiments, non-hydrolizable linkages are preferred, such as phosphorothioate linkages.
In some aspects, oligonucleotides of the invention comprise 3′ and 5′ termini (except for circular oligonucleotides). The 3′ and 5′ termini of a oligonucleotide can be substantially protected from nucleases, for example, by modifying the 3′ or 5′ linkages (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,849,902 and WO 98/13526). Oligonucleotides can be made resistant by the inclusion of a “blocking group.” The term “blocking group” as used herein refers to substituents (e.g., other than OH groups) that can be attached to oligonucleotides or nucleomonomers, either as protecting groups or coupling groups for synthesis (e.g., FITC, propyl (CH2—CH2—CH3), glycol (—O—CH2—CH2—O—) phosphate (PO32−), hydrogen phosphonate, or phosphoramidite). “Blocking groups” also include “end blocking groups” or “exonuclease blocking groups” which protect the 5′ and 3′ termini of the oligonucleotide, including modified nucleotides and non-nucleotide exonuclease resistant structures.
Exemplary end-blocking groups include cap structures (e.g., a 7-methylguanosine cap), inverted nucleomonomers, e.g., with 3′-3′ or 5′-5′ end inversions (see, e.g., Ortiagao et al. 1992. Antisense Res. Dev. 2:129), methylphosphonate, phosphoramidite, non-nucleotide groups (e.g., non-nucleotide linkers, amino linkers, conjugates) and the like. The 3′ terminal nucleomonomer can comprise a modified sugar moiety. The 3′ terminal nucleomonomer comprises a 3′-0 that can optionally be substituted by a blocking group that prevents 3′-exonuclease degradation of the oligonucleotide. For example, the 3′-hydroxyl can be esterified to a nucleotide through a 3′→3′ internucleotide linkage. For example, the alkyloxy radical can be methoxy, ethoxy, or isopropoxy, and preferably, ethoxy. Optionally, the 3′→3′linked nucleotide at the 3′ terminus can be linked by a substitute linkage. To reduce nuclease degradation, the 5′ most 3′→5′ linkage can be a modified linkage, e.g., a phosphorothioate or a P-alkyloxyphosphotriester linkage. Preferably, the two 5′ most 3′→5′ linkages are modified linkages. Optionally, the 5′ terminal hydroxy moiety can be esterified with a phosphorus containing moiety, e.g., phosphate, phosphorothioate, or P-ethoxyphosphate.
In some aspects, oligonucleotides can be chimeric RNA-DNA oligonucleotides which include both DNA and RNA.
The oligonucleotides are preferably in the range of 6 to 100 bases in length. However, nucleic acids of any size greater than 4 nucleotides (even many kb long) are capable of inducing a biological response according to the invention if sufficient stimulatory motifs are present. Preferably the nucleic acid is in the range of between 8 and 100 and in some embodiments between 8 and 50 or 8 and 30 nucleotides in size.
In some embodiments the oligonucleotides have a modified backbone such as a phosphorothioate (PS) backbone. In other embodiments the oligonucleotides have a phosphodiester (PO) backbone. In yet other embodiments oligonucleotides have a mixed or chimeric PO and PS backbone.
The nanostructure may also include an antigen. An antigen as used herein is a molecule capable of provoking an immune response in the body, especially the production of antibodies. Antigens include but are not limited to cells, cell extracts, proteins, polypeptides, peptides, polysaccharides, polysaccharide conjugates, peptide and non-peptide mimics of polysaccharides and other molecules, small molecules, lipids, glycolipids, carbohydrates, viruses and viral extracts and multicellular organisms such as parasites and allergens. The term antigen broadly includes any type of molecule which is recognized by a host immune system as being foreign. Antigens include but are not limited to cancer antigens, microbial antigens, and allergens.
Antigen can be attached to the structures by the externally-facing oligonucleotide through covalent or non-covalent, e.g. Watson/Crick hybridization. Alternatively or additionally the antigen may be incorporated into the liposomal bilayer via conjugation to a hydrophobic moiety (
In one embodiment, antigen is conjugated to the liposomal nanostructure via interactions with the oligonucleotide shell (
A cancer antigen as used herein is a compound, such as a peptide or protein, associated with a tumor or cancer cell surface and which is capable of provoking an immune response when expressed on the surface of an antigen presenting cell in the context of an MHC molecule. Cancer antigens can be prepared from cancer cells either by preparing crude extracts of cancer cells, for example, as described in Cohen, et al., 1994, Cancer Research, 54:1055, by partially purifying the antigens, by recombinant technology, or by de novo synthesis of known antigens. Cancer antigens include but are not limited to antigens that are recombinantly expressed, an immunogenic portion of, or a whole tumor or cancer. Such antigens can be isolated or prepared recombinantly or by any other means known in the art.
A microbial antigen as used herein is an antigen of a microorganism and includes but is not limited to virus, bacteria, parasites, and fungi. Such antigens include the intact microorganism as well as natural isolates and fragments or derivatives thereof and also synthetic compounds which are identical to or similar to natural microorganism antigens and induce an immune response specific for that microorganism. A compound is similar to a natural microorganism antigen if it induces an immune response (humoral and/or cellular) to a natural microorganism antigen. Such antigens are used routinely in the art and are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
Examples of viruses that have been found in humans include but are not limited to: Retroviridae (e.g. human immunodeficiency viruses, such as HIV-1 (also referred to as HDTV-III, LAVE or HTLV-III/LAV, or HIV-III; and other isolates, such as HIV-LP; Picornaviridae (e.g. polio viruses, hepatitis A virus; enteroviruses, human Coxsackie viruses, rhinoviruses, echoviruses); Calciviridae (e.g. strains that cause gastroenteritis); Togaviridae (e.g. equine encephalitis viruses, rubella viruses); Flaviridae (e.g. dengue viruses, encephalitis viruses, yellow fever viruses); Coronoviridae (e.g. coronaviruses); Rhabdoviradae (e.g. vesicular stomatitis viruses, rabies viruses); Filoviridae (e.g. ebola viruses); Paramyxoviridae (e.g. parainfluenza viruses, mumps virus, measles virus, respiratory syncytial virus); Orthomyxoviridae (e.g. influenza viruses); Bungaviridae (e.g. Hantaan viruses, bunga viruses, phleboviruses and Nairo viruses); Arena viridae (hemorrhagic fever viruses); Reoviridae (e.g. reoviruses, orbiviurses and rotaviruses); Birnaviridae; Hepadnaviridae (Hepatitis B virus); Parvovirida (parvoviruses); Papovaviridae (papilloma viruses, polyoma viruses); Adenoviridae (most adenoviruses); Herpesviridae (herpes simplex virus (HSV) 1 and 2, varicella zoster virus, cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes virus; Poxviridae (variola viruses, vaccinia viruses, pox viruses); and Iridoviridae (e.g. African swine fever virus); and other viruses (e.g. the agent of delta hepatitis (thought to be a defective satellite of hepatitis B virus), Hepatitis C; Norwalk and related viruses, and astroviruses).
Both gram negative and gram positive bacteria serve as antigens in vertebrate animals. Such gram positive bacteria include, but are not limited to, Pasteurella species, Staphylococci species, and Streptococcus species. Gram negative bacteria include, but are not limited to, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas species, and Salmonella species. Specific examples of infectious bacteria include but are not limited to, Helicobacter pyloris, Borelia burgdorferi, Legionella pneumophilia, Mycobacteria sps (e.g. M. tuberculosis, M. avium, M. intracellulare, M. kansaii, M. gordonae), Staphylococcus aureus, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitidis, Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A Streptococcus), Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus), Streptococcus (viridans group), Streptococcus faecalis, Streptococcus bovis, Streptococcus (anaerobic sps.), Streptococcus pneumoniae, pathogenic Campylobacter sp., Enterococcus sp., Haemophilus influenzae, Bacillus antracis, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Corynebacterium sp., Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, Clostridium perfringers, Clostridium tetani, Enterobacter aerogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida, Bacteroides sp., Fusobacterium nucleatum, Streptobacillus moniliformis, Treponema pallidium, Treponema pertenue, Leptospira, Rickettsia, and Actinomyces israelli.
Examples of fungi include Cryptococcus neoformans, Histoplasma capsulatum, Coccidioides immitis, Blastomyces dermatitidis, Chlamydia trachomatis, Candida albicans.
Other infectious organisms (i.e., protists) include Plasmodium spp. such as Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale, and Plasmodium vivax and Toxoplasma gondii. Blood-borne and/or tissues parasites include Plasmodium spp., Babesia microti, Babesia divergens, Leishmania tropica, Leishmania spp., Leishmania braziliensis, Leishmania donovani, Trypanosoma gambiense and Trypanosoma rhodesiense (African sleeping sickness), Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas' disease), and Toxoplasma gondii.
Other medically relevant microorganisms have been described extensively in the literature, e.g., see C. G. A Thomas, Medical Microbiology, Bailliere Tindall, Great Britain 1983, the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
As used herein, the terms “cancer antigen” and “tumor antigen” are used interchangeably to refer to antigens which are differentially expressed by cancer cells and can thereby be exploited in order to target cancer cells. Cancer antigens are antigens which can potentially stimulate apparently tumor-specific immune responses. Some of these antigens are encoded, although not necessarily expressed, by normal cells. These antigens can be characterized as those which are normally silent (i.e., not expressed) in normal cells, those that are expressed only at certain stages of differentiation and those that are temporally expressed such as embryonic and fetal antigens. Other cancer antigens are encoded by mutant cellular genes, such as oncogenes (e.g., activated ras oncogene), suppressor genes (e.g., mutant p53), fusion proteins resulting from internal deletions or chromosomal translocations. Still other cancer antigens can be encoded by viral genes such as those carried on RNA and DNA tumor viruses.
The nanostructures of the invention may be delivered to a subject in vivo or ex vivo for therapeutic and/or diagnostic use or may be used in vitro, ex vivo or in vivo for research purposes. Alternatively the nanostructures may be used for the purpose of provoking an immune response for generating reagents such as antibodies or cytokines which can be harvested.
The nanostructures may be administered alone or in any appropriate pharmaceutical carrier, such as a liquid, for example saline, or a powder, for administration in vivo. They can also be co-delivered with larger carrier particles or within administration devices. The nanostructures may be formulated or unformulated. The formulations of the invention can be administered in pharmaceutically acceptable solutions, which may routinely contain pharmaceutically acceptable concentrations of salt, buffering agents, preservatives, compatible carriers, adjuvants, and optionally other therapeutic ingredients. In some embodiments, nanostructures are mixed with a substance such as a lotion (for example, aquaphor) and are administered to the skin of a subject, whereby the nanostructures are delivered through the skin of the subject. It should be appreciated that any method of delivery of nanoparticles known in the art may be compatible with aspects of the invention. The nanostructures may also be sterile.
For use in therapy, an effective amount of the nanostructures can be administered to a subject by any mode that delivers the nanostructures to the desired cell. Administering pharmaceutical compositions may be accomplished by any means known to the skilled artisan. Routes of administration include but are not limited to oral, parenteral, intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous, mucosal, intranasal, sublingual, intratracheal, inhalation, ocular, vaginal, dermal, rectal, and by direct injection.
Thus, the invention in one aspect involves the finding that the nanostructures of the invention are highly effective in mediating immune stimulatory effects. These nanostructures (stimulatory and regulatory) are useful therapeutically and prophylactically for modulating the immune system to treat cancer, infectious diseases, allergy, asthma, autoimmune disease, and other disorders and to help protect against opportunistic infections following cancer chemotherapy.
Thus the nanostructures of the invention are useful as a vaccine for the treatment of a subject at risk of developing or a subject having allergy or asthma, an infection with an infectious organism or a cancer in which a specific cancer antigen has been identified. The nanostructures can also be formulated without an antigen or allergen for protection against infection, allergy or cancer, and in this case repeated doses may allow longer term protection. A subject at risk as used herein is a subject who has any risk of exposure to an infection causing pathogen or a cancer or an allergen or a risk of developing cancer. For instance, a subject at risk may be a subject who is planning to travel to an area where a particular type of infectious agent is found or it may be a subject who through lifestyle or medical procedures is exposed to bodily fluids which may contain infectious organisms or directly to the organism or even any subject living in an area where an infectious organism or an allergen has been identified. Subjects at risk of developing infection also include general populations to which a medical agency recommends vaccination with a particular infectious organism antigen. If the antigen is an allergen and the subject develops allergic responses to that particular antigen and the subject may be exposed to the antigen, i.e., during pollen season, then that subject is at risk of exposure to the antigen.
A subject having an infection is a subject that has been exposed to an infectious pathogen and has acute or chronic detectable levels of the pathogen in the body. The nanostructures can be used with or without an antigen to mount an antigen specific systemic or mucosal immune response that is capable of reducing the level of or eradicating the infectious pathogen. An infectious disease, as used herein, is a disease arising from the presence of a foreign microorganism in the body. It is particularly important to develop effective vaccine strategies and treatments to protect the body's mucosal surfaces, which are the primary site of pathogenic entry.
A subject having a cancer is a subject that has detectable cancerous cells. The cancer may be a malignant or non-malignant cancer. Cancers or tumors include but are not limited to biliary tract cancer; brain cancer; breast cancer; cervical cancer; choriocarcinoma; colon cancer; endometrial cancer; esophageal cancer; gastric cancer; intraepithelial neoplasms; lymphomas; liver cancer; lung cancer (e.g. small cell and non-small cell); melanoma; neuroblastomas; oral cancer; ovarian cancer; pancreas cancer; prostate cancer; rectal cancer; sarcomas; skin cancer; testicular cancer; thyroid cancer; and renal cancer, as well as other carcinomas and sarcomas. In one embodiment the cancer is hairy cell leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, cutaneous T-cell leukemia, multiple myeloma, follicular lymphoma, malignant melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, prostate carcinoma, bladder cell carcinoma, or colon carcinoma.
A subject shall mean a human or vertebrate animal including but not limited to a dog, cat, horse, cow, pig, sheep, goat, turkey, chicken, primate, e.g., monkey, and fish (aquaculture species), e.g. salmon. Thus, the invention can also be used to treat cancer and tumors, infections, autoimmune disease and allergy/asthma in non-human subjects.
As used herein, the term treat, treated, or treating when used with respect to an disorder such as an infectious disease, autoimmune disease, cancer, allergy, or asthma refers to a prophylactic treatment which increases the resistance of a subject to development of the disease (e.g., to infection with a pathogen) or, in other words, decreases the likelihood that the subject will develop the disease (e.g., become infected with the pathogen) as well as a treatment after the subject has developed the disease in order to fight the disease (e.g., reduce or eliminate the infection) or prevent the disease from becoming worse.
The nanostructures of the invention may also be coated with or administered in conjunction with an anti-microbial agent. An anti-microbial agent, as used herein, refers to a naturally-occurring or synthetic compound which is capable of killing or inhibiting infectious microorganisms. The type of anti-microbial agent useful according to the invention will depend upon the type of microorganism with which the subject is infected or at risk of becoming infected. Anti-microbial agents include but are not limited to anti-bacterial agents, anti-viral agents, anti-fungal agents and anti-parasitic agents. Phrases such as “anti-infective agent”, “anti-bacterial agent”, “anti-viral agent”, “anti-fungal agent”, “anti-parasitic agent” and “parasiticide” have well-established meanings to those of ordinary skill in the art and are defined in standard medical texts. Briefly, anti-bacterial agents kill or inhibit bacteria, and include antibiotics as well as other synthetic or natural compounds having similar functions. Antibiotics are low molecular weight molecules which are produced as secondary metabolites by cells, such as microorganisms. In general, antibiotics interfere with one or more bacterial functions or structures which are specific for the microorganism and which are not present in host cells. Anti-viral agents can be isolated from natural sources or synthesized and are useful for killing or inhibiting viruses. Anti-fungal agents are used to treat superficial fungal infections as well as opportunistic and primary systemic fungal infections. Anti-parasite agents kill or inhibit parasites.
The nanostructures of the invention may also be used for regulating the immune response such that the level of some immune factors are decreased. Achieving specific immune downregulation or “tolerance” is a significant challenge, as the prior art, in general, acts by broadly downregulating immune responses. This non-specific approach can lead to a high incidence of side effects, toxicity, and an increased risk of acquiring infectious diseases, among others. No commercially available compounds or structures have demonstrated the ability to induce potent and specific anti-inflammatory effects in the clinic. A challenge is delivery of the appropriate signals to immune cells, such as antigen, in the absence of additional co-stimulatory signals.
The nanostructures of the invention solve some of these problems encountered by the prior art. In some embodiments an antigen can be delivered intracellularly efficiently via conjugation to a nanostructure of the invention in a manner that achieves or promotes tolerance. The methods may involve antagonizing toll-like receptors during the antigen delivery process in order to enhance the ability to induce antigen-specific tolerance. The nanostructures used for these embodiments of the invention include a liposomal core which is attached to an immune suppressor, such as a TLR 4 immune suppressor and oligonucleotides positioned on the exterior of the core.
These regulatory nanostructures are useful for downregulating an immune response or anytime it is desirable to induce tolerance. For instance, they are useful for treating and preventing autoimmune disease, allergy, asthma, or other conditions where a component of the pathology involves an overactive immune response, such as liver fibrosis or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
A subject having an allergy is a subject that has or is at risk of developing an allergic reaction in response to an allergen. An allergy refers to acquired hypersensitivity to a substance (allergen). Allergic conditions include but are not limited to eczema, allergic rhinitis or coryza, hay fever, conjunctivitis, bronchial asthma, urticaria (hives) and food allergies, and other atopic conditions.
An allergen refers to a substance (antigen) that can induce an allergic or asthmatic response in a susceptible subject. The list of allergens is enormous and can include pollens, insect venoms, animal dander dust, fungal spores and drugs (e.g. penicillin). Examples of natural, animal and plant allergens include but are not limited to proteins specific to the following genuses: Canine (Canis familiaris); Dermatophagoides (e.g. Dermatophagoides farinae); Felis (Felis domesticus); Ambrosia (Ambrosia artemiisfolia; Lolium (e.g. Lolium perenne or Lolium multiflorum); Cryptomeria (Cryptomeria japonica); Alternaria (Alternaria alternata); Alder; Alnus (Alnus gultinoasa); Betula (Betula verrucosa); Quercus (Quercus alba); Olea (Olea europa); Artemisia (Artemisia vulgaris); Plantago (e.g. Plantago lanceolata); Parietaria (e.g. Parietaria officinalis or Parietaria judaica); Blattella (e.g. Blattella germanica); Apis (e.g. Apis multiflorum); Cupressus (e.g. Cupressus sempervirens, Cupressus arizonica and Cupressus macrocarpa); Juniperus (e.g. Juniperus sabinoides, Juniperus virginiana, Juniperus communis and Juniperus ashei); Thuya (e.g. Thuya orientalis); Chamaecyparis (e.g. Chamaecyparis obtusa); Periplaneta (e.g. Periplaneta americana); Agropyron (e.g. Agropyron repens); Secale (e.g. Secale cereale); Triticum (e.g. Triticum aestivum); Dactylis (e.g. Dactylis glomerata); Festuca (e.g. Festuca elatior); Poa (e.g. Poa pratensis or Poa compressa); Avena (e.g. Avena sativa); Holcus (e.g. Holcus lanatus); Anthoxanthum (e.g. Anthoxanthum odoratum); Arrhenatherum (e.g. Arrhenatherum elatius); Agrostis (e.g. Agrostis alba); Phleum (e.g. Phleum pratense); Phalaris (e.g. Phalaris arundinacea); Paspalum (e.g. Paspalum notatum); Sorghum (e.g. Sorghum halepensis); and Bromus (e.g. Bromus inermis).
Autoimmune disease is a class of diseases in which an subject's own antibodies react with host tissue or in which immune effector T cells are autoreactive to endogenous self peptides and cause destruction of tissue. Thus an immune response is mounted against a subject's own antigens, referred to as self antigens. Autoimmune diseases include but are not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), autoimmune encephalomyelitis, myasthenia gravis (MG), Hashimoto's thyroiditis, Goodpasture's syndrome, pemphigus (e.g., pemphigus vulgaris), Grave's disease, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura, scleroderma with anti-collagen antibodies, mixed connective tissue disease, polymyositis, pernicious anemia, idiopathic Addison's disease, autoimmune-associated infertility, glomerulonephritis (e.g., crescentic glomerulonephritis, proliferative glomerulonephritis), bullous pemphigoid, Sjögren's syndrome, insulin resistance, and autoimmune diabetes mellitus.
A “self-antigen” as used herein refers to an antigen of a normal host tissue. Normal host tissue does not include cancer cells. Thus an immune response mounted against a self-antigen, in the context of an autoimmune disease, is an undesirable immune response and contributes to destruction and damage of normal tissue, whereas an immune response mounted against a cancer antigen is a desirable immune response and contributes to the destruction of the tumor or cancer. Thus, in some aspects of the invention aimed at treating autoimmune disorders it is not recommended that the nanostructure be formulated with self antigens, particularly those that are the targets of the autoimmune disorder.
In other instances, the nanostructures may include small amounts of self-antigens. A number of animal studies have demonstrated that mucosal administration of low doses of antigen can result in a state of immune hyporesponsiveness or “tolerance.” The active mechanism appears to be a cytokine-mediated immune deviation away from a Th1 towards a predominantly Th2 and Th3 (i.e., TGF-β dominated) response. The active suppression with low dose antigen delivery can also suppress an unrelated immune response (bystander suppression) which is of considerable interest in the therapy of autoimmune diseases, for example, rheumatoid arthritis and SLE. Bystander suppression involves the secretion of Th1-counter-regulatory, suppressor cytokines in the local environment where proinflammatory and Th1 cytokines are released in either an antigen-specific or antigen-nonspecific manner. “Tolerance” as used herein is used to refer to this phenomenon. Indeed, oral tolerance has been effective in the treatment of a number of autoimmune diseases in animals including: experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis, collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. In these models, the prevention and suppression of autoimmune disease is associated with a shift in antigen-specific humoral and cellular responses from a Th1 to Th2/Th3 response.
In another aspect, the present invention is directed to a kit including one or more of the compositions previously discussed. A “kit,” as used herein, typically defines a package or an assembly including one or more of the compositions of the invention, and/or other compositions associated with the invention, for example, as previously described. Each of the compositions of the kit, if present, may be provided in liquid form (e.g., in solution), or in solid form (e.g., a dried powder). In certain cases, some of the compositions may be constitutable or otherwise processable (e.g., to an active form), for example, by the addition of a suitable solvent or other species, which may or may not be provided with the kit. Examples of other compositions that may be associated with the invention include, but are not limited to, solvents, surfactants, diluents, salts, buffers, emulsifiers, chelating agents, fillers, antioxidants, binding agents, bulking agents, preservatives, drying agents, antimicrobials, needles, syringes, packaging materials, tubes, bottles, flasks, beakers, dishes, frits, filters, rings, clamps, wraps, patches, containers, tapes, adhesives, and the like, for example, for using, administering, modifying, assembling, storing, packaging, preparing, mixing, diluting, and/or preserving the compositions components for a particular use, for example, to a sample and/or a subject.
In some embodiments, a kit associated with the invention includes one or more components of the nanostructure. For instance the kit may include liposomes for forming a liposome core, an immune stimulant or TLR4 immune suppressor and or oligonucleotides for the exterior of the nanostructure. A kit can also include one or more antigens and or other therapeutic agents.
A kit of the invention may, in some cases, include instructions in any form that are provided in connection with the compositions of the invention in such a manner that one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that the instructions are to be associated with the compositions of the invention. For instance, the instructions may include instructions for the use, modification, mixing, diluting, preserving, administering, assembly, storage, packaging, and/or preparation of the compositions and/or other compositions associated with the kit. In some cases, the instructions may also include instructions for the use of the compositions, for example, for a particular use, e.g., to a sample. The instructions may be provided in any form recognizable by one of ordinary skill in the art as a suitable vehicle for containing such instructions, for example, written or published, verbal, audible (e.g., telephonic), digital, optical, visual (e.g., videotape, DVD, etc.) or electronic communications (including Internet or web-based communications), provided in any manner.
In order that the invention described herein may be more fully understood, the following examples are set forth. The examples described in this application are offered to illustrate the compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, and methods provided herein and are not to be construed in any way as limiting their scope.
In one embodiment reduced to practice, oligonucleotides of sequence 5′-TCCATGACGTTCCTGACGTT-3′ (SEQ ID NO:1; designated as “CpG 1826”) were 3′-modified with alpha-tocopherol and incorporated into small unilamellar vesicles composed of (92% w/w) 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (DOPC) mixed with (8% w/w) monophosphoryl lipid A (
Liposomal SNA (Nanostructure) Synthesis
25 mg of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (DOPC) dissolved in 4 mL dichloromethane (DCM) was mixed with 1 mg monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) dissolved in 1 mL of chloroform in a glass container. The lipids were then dried onto the walls of the glass container in a thin film by gently drying under argon until all solvent has evaporated. Any residual solvent was removed by overnight lyophilization. The next day, the lipids were reconstituted in 10 mL of liposome buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM HEPES) by vortex and sonication, then passed through 2-5 freeze thaw cycles prior to serial extrusion through 100 nm, 50 nm, then 30 nm extrusion membranes. Following extrusion, 1 umol of oligonucleotide (5′-TCCATGACGTTCCTGACGTT-3′ SEQ ID NO:1) with a 3′-alpha-tocopherol group covalently attached) was mixed with the 26 mg of lipid and incubated overnight at 4 C to form the liposomal SNAs. The following day, the liposomal SNAs were purified by tangential flow filtration using a 300 kDa membrane cutoff filter using >5 volume exchanges of 1×PBS.
Some liposomal SNAs were additionally modified to contain ovalbumin by conjugating the ovalbumin first to an oligonucleotide complementary to CpG 1826 (5′-AACGTCAGGAACGTCATGGA-3′ SEQ ID NO:2). This ovalbumin-oligonucleotide conjugate was then hybridized to the liposomal SNAs by incubating at a 2-fold excess of ovalbumin-oligonucleotide conjugate relative to oligonucleotide on the liposomal SNA for 3 hours at 37 C, followed by overnight incubation at 4 C. Excess ovalbumin-oligonucleotide conjugate was removed by tangential flow filtration.
In Vitro Testing
The compounds were serially diluted 1:4. 20 uL of this mixture was seeded in duplicate in a 96 well plate. RAW Blue cells (InVivoGen), a reporter murine macrophage cell line derived from RAW 264.7 cells containing a NF-kB inducible secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) were seeded at 100k cells/well in 180 uL per well and added to the test compounds on the 96 well plate. Ramos Blue cells (InvivoGen), a reporter human B cell line derived from Ramos cells containing a NF-kB inducible SEAP were seeded at 306k cells/well in 180 uL per well and added to the test compounds on the 96 well plate. Importantly, Ramos Blue cells do not have functional signaling through TLR4. The cells were incubated with the test compound overnight at 37 C, 5% CO2 in a humidified chamber. The following day, the supernatants were probed for SEAP activity using the QuantiBlue reagent (InVivoGen) following the manufacturer recommended protocol. The results show that liposomal SNAs which carry agonists of both TLR4 and TLR9 induce greater activation of the RAW Blue cells that either alone in isolation (
To further profile the response triggered by liposomal SNAs containing both TLR9 and TLR4 agonists, the ability of liposomal SNAs to induce activation of MyD88-dependent and MyD88-independent pathways was tested, as measured by activation levels of TNF and IFN-alpha, respectively. For this, 6 million human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were resuspended at 1 million/mL in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin and seeded at 180k/well with 20 uL of test compound. Following overnight incubation, the supernatant was probed for TNF and IFN-alpha levels by ELISA. The results show that liposomal SNAs that deliver both CpG 1826 and MPLA in a single construct demonstrate elevated TNF and IFN-alpha levels that cannot be replicated either by delivering each in isolation, or by delivering both components in the same well but not on the same construct (
Next, parameters that might modulate the efficacy of the liposomal SNAs were identified. The quantity of MPLA feed into the liposomal formulation step might play a role, as well as the internucleotide linkage chemistry (PO vs PS). Accordingly, liposomal SNAs were developed with increasing MPLA feed from 3.8% (w/w) to 11.5% (w/w) and constructs containing both PO and PS linkages and tested them for activity in RAW Blue cells. In this cell line, it was observed that increasing the MPLA feed up to 7.7% MPLA but not up to 11.5% increased the potency of activation of the liposomal SNA (
Finally, the ability of antigen-conjugated liposomal SNAs to activate immune cells was tested. Ovalbumin loaded liposomal SNAs were incubated as described with RAW Blue cells overnight at the level of SEAP probed by QuantiBlue assay. Conjugation of antigen to the liposomal SNAs appeared to increase their activity (
In Vivo Testing
This form of antigen delivery has been shown to induce more potent induction of immune stimulatory effects in vitro (
C57BL/6 mice (N=4/group) were immunized (2000 μL s.c., 100 μg ovalbumin equivalent dose) with the indicated formulations on day 0 and 21 using ovalbumin as the model antigen (
In another experiment, C57BL/6 mice (N=11/group) were inoculated with 1×106 E.G7-OVA cells (ATCC #CRL-2113) on day 0 then treated with the indicated compounds on days 3, 7, 10 (2000 μL s.c., 100 μg ovalbumin equivalent dose). Tumor volume was calculated by measuring the length and width of the subcutaneous tumor and applying the formula tumor volume=(length)×(width)×(width)/2. The results demonstrate activation of strong cellular responses to antigen in vivo with evidence of significant (95%) reduction of tumor burden (
In the claims articles such as “a,” “an,” and “the” may mean one or more than one unless indicated to the contrary or otherwise evident from the context. Claims or descriptions that include “or” between one or more members of a group are considered satisfied if one, more than one, or all of the group members are present in, employed in, or otherwise relevant to a given product or process unless indicated to the contrary or otherwise evident from the context. The invention includes embodiments in which exactly one member of the group is present in, employed in, or otherwise relevant to a given product or process. The invention includes embodiments in which more than one or all of the group members are present in, employed in or otherwise relevant to a given product or process.
Furthermore, the invention encompasses all variations, combinations, and permutations in which one or more limitations, elements, clauses, and descriptive terms from one or more of the listed claims is introduced into another claim. For example, any claim that is dependent on another claim can be modified to include one or more limitations found in any other claim that is dependent on the same base claim. Where elements are presented as lists, e.g., in Markush group format, each subgroup of the elements is also disclosed, and any element(s) can be removed from the group. It should it be understood that, in general, where the invention, or aspects of the invention, is/are referred to as comprising particular elements and/or features, certain embodiments of the invention or aspects of the invention consist, or consist essentially of, such elements and/or features. For purposes of simplicity, those embodiments have not been specifically set forth in haec verba herein. It is also noted that the terms “comprising” and “containing” are intended to be open and permits the inclusion of additional elements or steps. Where ranges are given, endpoints are included. Furthermore, unless otherwise indicated or otherwise evident from the context and understanding of one of ordinary skill in the art, values that are expressed as ranges can assume any specific value or sub-range within the stated ranges in different embodiments of the invention, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit of the range, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
This application refers to various issued patents, published patent applications, journal articles, and other publications, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. If there is a conflict between any of the incorporated references and the instant specification, the specification shall control. In addition, any particular embodiment of the present invention that falls within the prior art may be explicitly excluded from any one or more of the claims. Because such embodiments are deemed to be known to one of ordinary skill in the art, they may be excluded even if the exclusion is not set forth explicitly herein. Any particular embodiment of the invention can be excluded from any claim, for any reason, whether or not related to the existence of prior art.
Those skilled in the art will recognize or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation many equivalents to the specific embodiments described herein. The scope of the present embodiments described herein is not intended to be limited to the above Description, but rather is as set forth in the appended claims. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that various changes and modifications to this description may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention, as defined in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/569,007, filed Sep. 12, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/315,538, filed Dec. 1, 2016, which is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2015/034226, filed Jun. 4, 2015, which claims the benefit of the filing date priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/007,528, entitled “MULTIVALENT DELIVERY OF IMMUNE MODULATORS BY LIPOSOMAL SPHERICAL NUCLEIC ACIDS FOR PROPHYLACTIC OR THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS” filed on Jun. 4, 2014, the entire contents of each of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4179337 | Davis et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4289872 | Denkewalter et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4469863 | Ts'o et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4476301 | Imbach et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4489055 | Couvreur et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4587044 | Miller et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4605735 | Miyoshi et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4667025 | Miyoshi et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4789737 | Miyoshi et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4828979 | Klevan et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4835263 | Nguyen et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4845205 | Huynh Dinh et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4876335 | Yamane et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4904582 | Tullis | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4958013 | Letsinger | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4981957 | Lebleu et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5008050 | Cullis et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5013830 | Ohtsuka et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5023243 | Tullis | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5034506 | Summerton et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5130302 | Spielvogel et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5134066 | Rogers et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5138045 | Cook et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5177196 | Meyer, Jr. et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5185444 | Summerton et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5188897 | Suhadolnik et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5194599 | Froehler et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5214134 | Weis et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5214136 | Lin et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5216141 | Benner | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5220007 | Pederson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5229490 | Tam | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5235033 | Summerton et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5256775 | Froehler | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5258506 | Urdea et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5262536 | Hobbs, Jr. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264423 | Cohen et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264562 | Matteucci | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264564 | Matteucci | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264618 | Felgner et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5276019 | Cohen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5278302 | Caruthers et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5286717 | Cohen et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5317098 | Shizuya et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5321131 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5359044 | Cook et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5366878 | Pederson et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367066 | Urdea et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5371241 | Brush | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5391723 | Priest | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5393878 | Leumann | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5399676 | Froehler | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5405939 | Suhadolnik et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5414077 | Lin et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5416203 | Letsinger | May 1995 | A |
| 5432272 | Benner | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5434257 | Matteucci et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5446137 | Maag et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5451463 | Nelson et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5453496 | Caruthers et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5455233 | Spielvogel et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5457187 | Gmeiner et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5459255 | Cook et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5466677 | Baxter et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5466786 | Buhr et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5470967 | Huie et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5476925 | Letsinger et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5484908 | Froehler et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5486603 | Buhr | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5489677 | Sanghvi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5491133 | Walder et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5512667 | Reed et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5519126 | Hecht | May 1996 | A |
| 5519134 | Acevedo et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5525711 | Hawkins et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527899 | Froehler | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5536821 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539082 | Nielsen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541306 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541307 | Cook et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5545730 | Urdea et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5547842 | Hogan et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5550111 | Suhadolnik et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5552538 | Urdea et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5552540 | Haralambidis | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5561225 | Maddry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5563253 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5565350 | Kmiec | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5565555 | Froehler et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5567810 | Weis et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571799 | Tkachuk et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5576427 | Cook et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578717 | Urdea et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578718 | Cook et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5587361 | Cook et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5587371 | Sessler et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5587469 | Cook et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5591722 | Montgomery et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5594121 | Froehler et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596086 | Matteucci et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596091 | Switzer | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5597909 | Urdea et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5602240 | De Mesmaeker et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5608046 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5610289 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5610300 | Altmann et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5614617 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618704 | Sanghvi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623070 | Cook et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625050 | Beaton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5627053 | Usman et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5633360 | Bischofberger et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5639873 | Barascut et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5646269 | Matteucci et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5652355 | Metelev et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5658873 | Bertsch-Frank et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5663312 | Chaturvedula | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5670633 | Cook et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5672697 | Buhr et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5677437 | Teng et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5677439 | Weis et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681941 | Cook et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5688941 | Cook et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5700922 | Cook | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5721218 | Froehler | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5750692 | Cook et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5763588 | Matteucci et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5780448 | Davis | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5792608 | Swaminathan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5814666 | Green et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5830653 | Froehler et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5955589 | Cook et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6005096 | Matteucci et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6194328 | Krieg et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6194388 | Krieg et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6207646 | Krieg et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6214806 | Krieg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6218371 | Krieg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6228642 | Baker et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6239116 | Krieg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6271209 | Smith et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6339068 | Krieg et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6361944 | Mirkin et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6406705 | Davis et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6417340 | Mirkin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6429199 | Krieg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6495324 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6506564 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6534062 | Raz et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6582921 | Mirkin et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6610308 | Haensler | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6610491 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6656730 | Manoharan | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6677122 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6677153 | Iversen | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6682895 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6709825 | Mirkin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6720147 | Mirkin et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6720411 | Mirkin et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6750016 | Mirkin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6759199 | Mirkin et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6767702 | Mirkin et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6773884 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6777186 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6812334 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6818753 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6828432 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6849725 | Junghans et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6861221 | Mirkin et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6878814 | Mirkin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 7001616 | Batich et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7038029 | Lopez | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7098320 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7129222 | Van Nest et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7176296 | Agrawal et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7208587 | Mirkin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7223741 | Krieg | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7238472 | Mirkin et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7250403 | Van Nest et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7255868 | Fearon et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7262286 | Kandimalla et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7276489 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7332586 | Franzen et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7354907 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7387271 | Noelle et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7404969 | Chen et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7427405 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7470674 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7514099 | Chen et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7563618 | Gryaznov et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7569553 | Krieg | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7569554 | Kandimalla et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7615539 | Uhlmann et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7628990 | Tuck et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7666674 | Klinman et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7709617 | Kandimalla et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7713535 | Agrawal et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7718622 | Tuck et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7727969 | Farokhzad et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7745606 | Dina et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7776834 | Agrawal et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7786089 | Kandimalla et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7833992 | Vargeese et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7851453 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7875594 | Kandimalla et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7884083 | Van Nest et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7884197 | Kandimalla et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7960362 | Kandimalla et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7964578 | Vargeese et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7993659 | Noelle et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8008266 | Krieg et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8008267 | Kandimalla et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8017591 | Brzezicha et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8058249 | Krieg et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8088388 | Sokoll | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8124590 | Van Nest et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8128944 | Jurk et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8158768 | Dina et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8188254 | Uhlmann et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8188261 | Kandimalla et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8283328 | Krieg et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8304396 | Krieg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8309527 | Krieg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8323686 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8333980 | Van Nest et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8431544 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8470342 | Klinman et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8586555 | Fearon et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8846080 | Biemans et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8853375 | Kandimalla et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8871732 | Dina et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8889181 | Kwon | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8933046 | Machuy et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8940310 | Barrat et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8945590 | Fairman et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8968746 | Baumhof et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9061001 | van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9066978 | Ilyinskii et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9139827 | Mirkin et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9192667 | Hoves et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9200287 | Uhlmann et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9212366 | Wittig et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9216155 | Thaxton et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9308253 | Kim et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9364433 | Andersson et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9421254 | Berzofsky et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9499815 | Schroff et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
| 9506056 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9522958 | Epstein et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9532948 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9549901 | Shi et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9580708 | Uhlmann et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9617541 | Mirkin et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9617547 | Gemba | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9693957 | Lin et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9764031 | Ilyinskii et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9844562 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9868955 | Guiducci et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9889209 | Mirkin et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9901616 | Dhar et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9907845 | Reed et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9907862 | Baumhof et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9919058 | Klinman et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9950063 | Reed et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9968673 | Navarro y Garcia et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9976147 | Kortylewski et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9987355 | Reed et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 9999673 | Rajeev et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10006032 | Schroff et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10029016 | Irvine et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10041074 | Ozsolak | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10078092 | Mutharasan et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10098958 | Mirkin et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10144933 | Gemba et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10149905 | Gemba et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10155950 | Munnes et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10182988 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10196643 | Dina et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10208310 | Mader et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10280424 | Kleuss et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10322173 | Gemba et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10328026 | Thaxton et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10370656 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10391116 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10398784 | Mirkin et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10413565 | Plebanek et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10434064 | Radovic-Moreno et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10456463 | Davis et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10517927 | Thaxton et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10568898 | Thaxton et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10619210 | Ahuja et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10653780 | Hope et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
| 10682400 | Ali et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10704043 | Daniel et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
| 10760080 | Mader et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10792251 | Mirkin et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10837018 | Radovic-Moreno et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10851379 | Munnes et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10894963 | Radovic-Moreno et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 11123294 | Radovic-Moreno et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
| 20020156033 | Bratzler et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020172711 | Martin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020172953 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020197269 | Lingnau et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030026782 | Krieg | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050261 | Krieg et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030091599 | Davis et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030104044 | Semple et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030129251 | Van Nest et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030133988 | Fearon et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030138413 | Vicari et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030147966 | Franzen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030170162 | Nayfeh et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030181412 | Erikson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212026 | Krieg et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040014956 | Woolf et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040053384 | Sligar et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040087534 | Krieg et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092468 | Schwartz | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040131628 | Bratzler et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143112 | Krieg et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040170560 | Fossheim et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040247680 | Farokhzad et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040248099 | Goppelt et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040266719 | McCluskie et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050009773 | Kandimalla et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050089890 | Cubicciotti | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090671 | Chang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096263 | Keay et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050130911 | Uhlmann et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050136258 | Nie et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050169888 | Hartmann et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20060002949 | Glenn et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060003962 | Ahluwalia et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060014713 | Agrawal et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060019916 | Krieg et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060019917 | Guerciolini et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060083781 | Shastri et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060105343 | Zetter et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060140875 | Krieg et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060147456 | Lebecque et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060188560 | Cheresh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060251623 | Bachmann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252037 | Kolesnick et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060275371 | Dai et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060292174 | de los Rios et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070066554 | Krieg et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093439 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070148251 | Hossainy et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070184068 | Renner et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070218501 | Fogelman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070243132 | Russell-Jones et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070243196 | Bruck et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070249555 | Barbaras et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070298257 | Ludwig et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080003232 | Wang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080045473 | Uhlmann et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080057128 | Li et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080124366 | Ohlfest et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080175893 | Huang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080181928 | Hakimi-Mehr et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080194463 | Weller et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080206265 | Kandimalla et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080213177 | Rademacher et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080220072 | Unger et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080274454 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080279785 | Kandimalla et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080306016 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311182 | Ferrari et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090018028 | Lindsay et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090053169 | Castillo et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081157 | Kornbluth et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081244 | Glenn et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090148384 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090155173 | Scherman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090191185 | Selander | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090191188 | Krieg et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090209629 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090286853 | Gryaznov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090317802 | Bhatia et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090322327 | Gao | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090324706 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100003287 | Mills et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100003317 | Akinc et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100092486 | Kandimalla et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100111968 | Branigan et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100136682 | Mirkin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100144848 | Vogel et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100166842 | Lu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100183634 | Luo et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100184844 | Mirkin et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100203142 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100233141 | Polach et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100233270 | Mirkin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100267814 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100303803 | Schroff et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110020242 | Zheng et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110021334 | Maier | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110052680 | Hendrickson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110052697 | Farokhzad et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110111974 | Mirkin et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110158937 | Kandimalla et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110201594 | Murthi et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110201672 | Krieg et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110223257 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110229529 | Irvine et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110237435 | Ryan | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110244026 | Guild et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110256224 | Sigalov | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110262347 | Ruoslahti et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293700 | Bratzler et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293701 | Bratzler et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293723 | Bratzler et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110305734 | Edelson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120082616 | Trawick et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120093804 | Schroff et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120093914 | Schubert | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120107303 | Kandimalla et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120149843 | Chien et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120244230 | Mirkin et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120258126 | Scholler et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120282186 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120301499 | Bachmann et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130004520 | Andersson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130028857 | Gao et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130034599 | Thaxton et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130071403 | Rolland et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130089614 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130095039 | Lu et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130101512 | Mirkin et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130123333 | Mirkin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130149374 | Lee et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130177625 | Kim et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130178611 | Seya et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130196951 | Schoenfisch et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130252852 | Pfeiffer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130287814 | Schroff et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130295129 | Irvine et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130315831 | Shi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140005258 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140010830 | Schroff et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140065425 | Bogdanov | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140199379 | Tartour et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140227327 | Bencherif et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140294927 | Thaxton et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150080320 | Desai | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150086985 | Giljohann et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150104501 | Um et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150118264 | Baumhof et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20160186178 | Radovic-Moreno et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160194642 | Gryaznov et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160237429 | Cubillos-Ruiz et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160274134 | Mutharasan et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310425 | Mirkin et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160339090 | Hacohen et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160348114 | Kleuss et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160375115 | Binder et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170042920 | Bantia | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170130231 | Chae et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170175121 | Gryaznov | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170240960 | Giljohann et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170306331 | Mader et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20180042848 | Gryaznov et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180043023 | Ilyinskii et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180214376 | Giljohann | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20190142739 | Patel et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20200030440 | Bazmorelli et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200069587 | Radovic-Moreno et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200069596 | Wagner | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200188521 | Kang et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200248183 | Nallagatla et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20200255837 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2020 | A9 |
| 20200297867 | Kang et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200308579 | Kang | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200339989 | Daniel et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200339996 | Mader et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20210002640 | Kang et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 070368 | Mar 2010 | AR |
| 2004218696 | Nov 2004 | AU |
| 1357042 | Jul 2002 | CN |
| 1474831 | Feb 2004 | CN |
| 101180400 | May 2008 | CN |
| 102036652 | Apr 2011 | CN |
| 102165061 | Aug 2011 | CN |
| 103212089 | Jul 2013 | CN |
| 1 251 872 | Oct 2002 | EP |
| 1 221 955 | Sep 2005 | EP |
| 1628531 | Mar 2006 | EP |
| 1648913 | Apr 2006 | EP |
| 1768699 | Apr 2007 | EP |
| 1 700 603 | Jun 2007 | EP |
| 1802757 | Jul 2007 | EP |
| 1 889 911 | Feb 2008 | EP |
| 1350262 | Jun 2008 | EP |
| 1991678 | Nov 2008 | EP |
| 2162117 | Mar 2010 | EP |
| 1408110 | Jun 2011 | EP |
| 2391718 | Dec 2011 | EP |
| 2399608 | Dec 2011 | EP |
| 1807094 | Jan 2012 | EP |
| 2563384 | Mar 2013 | EP |
| 2656858 | Oct 2013 | EP |
| 2874651 | May 2015 | EP |
| 2759306 | Apr 2016 | EP |
| 2 360 252 | Feb 2017 | EP |
| 3136858 | Mar 2017 | EP |
| 3137105 | Mar 2017 | EP |
| 2004-315433 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2011-507807 | Mar 2011 | JP |
| 2011-518826 | Jun 2011 | JP |
| 2014-503475 | Feb 2014 | JP |
| 2014-528955 | Oct 2014 | JP |
| 20110039798 | Apr 2011 | KR |
| WO 1989002439 | Mar 1989 | WO |
| WO 1992021330 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| WO 1993007883 | Apr 1993 | WO |
| WO 1993021528 | Oct 1993 | WO |
| WO 1994001550 | Jan 1994 | WO |
| WO 1995006731 | Mar 1995 | WO |
| WO 1996034876 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| WO 1997012896 | Apr 1997 | WO |
| WO 9748715 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 1998004740 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| WO 1998018810 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO 1998039352 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO 1999014226 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO 2000020645 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000042188 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO 2001000876 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001003709 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001022990 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001049869 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001051665 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001073123 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO 2002044321 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO 2002096262 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO 2003008539 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003030941 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003051278 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003086280 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003101386 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004047870 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005030259 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005063201 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005063288 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005116226 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006012695 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006015560 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006080946 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006088833 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006099445 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006110350 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006110350 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006128121 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006138145 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007008463 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2006108405 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007047455 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007055682 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007055704 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007064857 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007089607 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007096134 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007106683 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008014979 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008042156 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008097328 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008098248 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008127789 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009012786 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009061515 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009073984 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009105260 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009131704 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009131931 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009133378 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009120887 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010017152 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010017154 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010060110 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010085959 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010088395 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010091293 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010105209 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010120420 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011017456 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011017690 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| WO 2010147387 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011053940 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011072133 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011079290 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011091065 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011113054 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011143608 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012006634 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012022948 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012055933 | May 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012068470 | May 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012084991 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012097177 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| WO 2013012628 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013049941 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013098813 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013151771 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013177419 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| WO 2014012479 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014025795 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014052188 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014123935 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014169264 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014201245 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2015013673 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015013675 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015153975 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015168379 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015187966 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015195628 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2016057549 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016115320 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016134104 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| WO 2017011662 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017035278 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017136467 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017184427 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017193081 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017193084 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017193087 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2018053508 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO 2019168558 | Sep 2019 | WO |
| WO 2020168005 | Aug 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020219985 | Oct 2020 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Extended European Search Report dated May 15, 2019 in connection with EP 19156455.8. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 13, 2015 for PCT/US2015/034226. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 15, 2016 for PCT/US2015/034226. |
| [No Author Listed] Synthetic CpG ODNs Activate immune cells through the Toll-like receptor (TLR) Pathway. IDT Integrated DNA Technologies. Apr. 11, 2017. 3 pages. |
| [No Author Listed] Modern Pharmaceutical Design. 2006. Chapter 5. p. 273. English language summary. 2 pages. |
| Acton et al., Identification of scavenger receptor SR-BI as a high density lipoprotein receptor. Science. Jan. 26, 1996;271(5248):518-20. |
| Agbasi-Porter et al., Transcription inhibition using oligonucleotide-modified gold nanoparticles, Bioconjugate Chem., 17(5):1178-83 (2006). |
| Agrawal et al., Antisence therapeutics: Is it as simple as complementary base recognition? Mol. Med. Today. 2000; 6: 72-81. |
| Aissaoui et al., Efficient topical delivery of plasmid DNA to lung in vivo mediated by putative triqqered, PEGylated pDNA nanoparticles, J . Control Release. 154:275-84 (2011). |
| Akbarzadeh et al., Liposome: classification, preparation, and applications, Nanoscale Res Lett. Feb. 22, 2013;8(1):102. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-102. |
| Akhter et al., Gold nanoparticles in theranostic oncology: current state-of-the-art. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. Oct. 2012;9(10):1225-43. Epub Aug. 16, 2012. |
| Alemdaroglu et al., DNA Block Copolymer Micelles—A Combinatorial Tool for Cancer Nanotechnology. Advanced Materials. Mar. 2008;20(5)899-902. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200700866l. |
| Ali et al., Vaccines Combined with Immune Checkpoint Antibodies Promote Cytotoxic T-cell Activity and Tumor Eradication. Cancer Immunol Res. Feb. 2016;4(2):95-100. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14/0126. Epub Dec. 15, 2015. |
| Altieri, Survivin, versatile modulation of cell division and apoptosis in cancer. Oncogene 2003; 22: 8581- 9. |
| Andrews et al., Conjugation of Lipid and CpG-Containing Oligonucleotide Yields an Efficient Method for Liposome Incorporation. Bioconjugate Chem. 2011;22:1279-1286. |
| Anton et al., Design and production of nanoparticles formulated from nano-emulsion templates—a review. J. Control Release. 2008; 128(3):185-99. |
| Asthana et al., Mannosylated chitosan nanoparticles for delivery of antisense oligonucleotides for macrophage targeting. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:526391. doi: 10.1155/2014/526391. Epub Jun. 26, 2014. |
| Bae et al., Oil-encapsulating PEO-PPO-PEO/PEG shell cross-linked nanocapsules for target-specific delivery of paclitaxel, Biomacromolecules. 8:650-6 (2007). |
| Bae et al., Targeted drug delivery to tumors: myths, reality and possibility. J Control Release. Aug. 10, 2011;153(3):198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.06.001. Epub Jun. 6, 2011. |
| Ballas et al., Induction of NK activity in murine and human cells by CpG motifs in oligodeoxynucleotides and bacterial DNA. J Immunol. Sep. 1, 1996;157(5):1840-5. |
| Banchelli, M. et al., “Phospholipid Membranes Decorated by Cholesterol-Based Oligonucleotides as Soft Hybrid Nanostructures,” J. Phys. Chem., 2008, 112 (35), 10942-10952. |
| Banerjee et al., Poly(ethylene glycol)-Prodrug Conjugates: Concept, Design, and Applications, J.; Druo De/iv. 2012:103973 (2012). |
| Banga et al., Drug-loaded Polymeric Spherical Nucleic Acids: Enhancing Colloidal Stability and Cellular Uptake of Polymeric Nanoparticles through DNA Surface-functionalization. Biomacromol. Feb. 13, 2017;18(2):483-9. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01563. |
| Banga et al., Liposomal spherical nucleic acids. J Am Chem Soc. Jul. 16, 2014;136(28):9866-9. doi: 10.1021/ja504845f. Epub Jul. 1, 2014. |
| Bardeesy et al., Pancreatic cancer biology and genetics, Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2002;2(12):897-909. |
| Barrat et al., Nucleic acids of mammalian origin can act as endogenous ligands for Toll-like receptors and may promote systemic lupus erythematosus. J Exp Med. Oct. 17, 2005;202(8):1131-9. |
| Berton et al., Highly loaded nanoparticulate carrier using an hydrophobic antisense oligonucleotide complex. Eur. J. Pharma. Sci. 1999;9:163-70. |
| Bhattarai et al., “Enhanced Gene and siRNA Delivery by Polycation-Modified Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Loaded with Chloroquine,” Pharm. Res., 2010, 27, 2556-2568. |
| Birck et al., Mutation and allelic loss of the PTEN/MMAC1 gene in primary and metastatic melanoma biopsies. J. Invest. Dermatol. 114: 277-80. |
| Bisht et al., Polymeric nanoparticle-encapsulated curcumin (“nanocurcumin”): a novel strategy for human cancer therapy. J. Nanobiotechnology. 2007;5:3. 18 pages. |
| Bitounis et al., Optimizing Druggability through Liposomal Formulations: New Approaches to an Old Concept. ISRN Pharm. 2012;2012:738432. doi: 10.5402/2012/738432. Epub Feb. 9, 2012. |
| Bode et al. CpG DNA as a vaccine adjuvant. Expert Rev Vaccines. Apr. 2011;10(4):499-511. doi: 10.1586/erv.10.174. |
| Boudreault et al., Nanoscale tools to selectively destroy cancer cells. Chem Commun. May 14, 2008;(18):2118-20. doi: 10.1039/b800528a. Epub Apr. 7, 2008. |
| Bozzuto et al., Liposomes as nanomedical devices. Int J Nanomedicine. Feb. 2, 2015;10:975- 99. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S68861. |
| Bratu et al., Visualizing the distribution and transport of mRNAs in living cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100: 13308-13. |
| Briley et al., In Nanomaterials for Biomedicine; American Chemical Society. 2012;1119:1-20. |
| Brown et al., Surface treatment of the hydrophobic drug danazol to improve drug dissolution. Int. J. Pharmaceutics. 1998;165:227-37. |
| Bunge et al., Lipophilic Oligonucleotides Spontaneously Insert into Lipid Membranes, Bind Complementary DNA Strands, and Sequester into Lipid-Disordered Domains, Langmuir 2007, vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 4455-4464. |
| Burgess, Liposome preparation—Avanti® Polar Lipids. Sigma-Aldrich. 1998. 3 pages. |
| Cao et al., Reversible Cell-Specific Drug Delivery with Aptamer-Functionalized Liposomes, Anqew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:6494-8. |
| Capaccioli et al., Cationic lipids improve antisense oligonucleotide uptake and prevent degradation in cultured cells and inhuman serum. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993;197(2): 818-25. |
| Castoldi et al., A sensitive array for micro RNA expression profiling (miChip) based on locked nucleic acids (LNA). RNA. 2006;12: 913-20. |
| Cha et al., Hepatocellular carcinoma: current management. Curr. Probl. Surg. 2010;47(1):10-67. |
| Chandaroy et al., Temperature-controlled content release from liposomes encapsulating Pluronic F127. J Control Release. Sep. 11, 2001;76(1-2):27-37. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00429-1. |
| Chari et al., Immunoconjugates containing novel maytansinoids: promising anticancer drugs. Cancer Res. 1992;52(1):127-31. |
| Charreyre et al., Fluorescence energy transfer study of the conformation of oligonucleotides covalently bound to polystyrene latex particles. Langmuir. 1997;13: 3103-10. |
| Chavany, et al., Adsorption of oligonucleotides onto polyisohexylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles protects them against nucleases and increases their cellular uptake. Pharma. Res. 1994;11(9): 1370-8. |
| Chen et al., Ionic strength-dependent persistence lengths of single-stranded RNA and DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:799-804. |
| Chen et al., Kinetics and thermodynamics of DNA hybridization on gold nanoparticles. Nucleic Acids Res. Jun. 2009;37(11):3756-65. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp230. Epub Apr. 20, 2009. |
| Chen et al., Nanoparticle-aptamer: an effective growth inhibitor for human cancer cells. IMECE 2009-11966. Jul. 8, 2010;271-2. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2009-11966. 2 pgs. |
| Cheng et al., Interdigitated phospholipid/alkanethiol bilayers assembled on APTMS-supported gold colloid electrodes. Electroanalysis. 2004;16(1-2):127-31. doi:10.1002/elan.200302929. |
| Cheng et al., Tandem synthesis of core-shell brush copolymers and their transformation to peripherally cross-linked and hollowed nanostructures. J Am Chem Soc. May 31, 2006;128(21):6808-9. Published on web May 6, 2006. |
| Chinnathambi et al., Binding mode of CpG Oligodeoxynucleotides to nanoparticles regulates bifurcated cytokine induction via Toll-like Receptor 9. Sci Reports. 2012;2:1-9. |
| Chirila et al., The use of synthetic polymers for delivery of therapeutic antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Biomaterials. 2002;23: 321-42. |
| Cho et al., Immunostimulatory DNA-based vaccines induce cytotoxic lymphocyte activity by a T-helper cell-independent mechanism. Nat Biotechnol. May 2000;18(5):509-14. |
| Cho et al., Targeted delivery of siRNA-generating DNA nanocassettes using multifunctional nanoparticles. Small. Jun. 10, 2013;9(11):1964-73. doi: 10.1002/smll.201201973. Epub Jan. 6, 2013. |
| Cho et al., Therapeutic nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. Mar. 1, 2008;14(5):1310-6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1441. |
| Choi et al., Mechanism for the endocytosis of spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013;110:7625-7630. |
| Chung et al., Nuclease-resistant DNA aptamer on gold nanoparticles for the simultaneous detection of Pb2+ and Hg2+ in human serum, Biosens. Bioelectron. 41 :827-32 (2013). |
| Cload et al., Polyether tethered oligonucleotide probes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991;113(16): 6324-6. |
| Combadiere et al., Particle-based vaccines for transcutaneous vaccination. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. Mar. 2008;31(2-3):293-315. Epub Oct. 30, 2007. Review. |
| Concise Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, “Polynucleotides,” J. I. Kroschwitz Ed., John Wiley & Sons, pp. 858-859 (1990). |
| Cook, Medicinal chemistry of antisense oligonucleotides—future opportunities, Anti-Cancer Drug Design, 6:585-607 (1991). |
| Cui et al., Topical immunization using nanoengineered genetic vaccines. J Control Release. May 17, 2002;81(1-2):173-84. |
| Cutler et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134:1376-1391 (Year: 2012). |
| Cutler et al., Polyvalent nucleic acid nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:9254. |
| Cutler et al., Polyvalent oligonucleotide iron oxide nanoparticle “click” conjugates. Nano Lett. Apr. 14, 2010;10(4):1477-80. doi:10.1021/n1100477m. |
| Cutler et al., Spherical nucleic acids. J Am Chem Soc. Jan. 25, 2012;134(3):1376-91. doi: 10.1021/ja209351u. Epub Jan. 9, 2012. |
| Dave et al. ACS Nano vol. 5, pp. 1304-1312 (Year: 2011). |
| Dave et al., Programmable assembly of DNA-functionalized liposomes by DNA. ACS Nano. Feb. 22, 2011;5(2):1304-12. doi: 10.1021/nn1030093. Epub Jan. 4, 2011. |
| De Mesmaeker et al., Backbone modifications in oligonucleotides and peptide nucleic acid systems, Curr. Opin. in Struct. Biol., 5: 343-55 (1995). |
| Deering et al., Nucleic acid vaccines: prospects for non-viral delivery of mRNA vaccines. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. Jun. 2014;11(6):885-99. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2014.901308. Epub Mar. 26, 2014. Review. |
| Dessi et al., Role of cholesterol synthesis and esterification in the growth of CEM and MOLT4 lymphoblastic cells. Biochem J. Feb. 1, 1997;321 ( Pt 3):603-8. |
| Dhar et al., Polyvalent oligonucleotide gold nanoparticle conjugates as delivery vehicles for platinum (IV) warheads. J Am Chem Soc. Oct. 21, 2009;131(41):14652-3. doi: 10.1021/ja907182. |
| Diebold et al., Nucleic acid agonists for Toll-like receptor 7 are defined by the presence of uridine ribonucleotides. Eur J Immunol. Dec. 2006;36(12):3256-67. |
| Dikmen et al., Targeting critical steps of cancer metastasis and recurrence using telomerase template antagonists. Biochim Biophys Acta. Apr. 2009;1792(4):240-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.01.018. Epub Feb. 9, 2009. |
| Dua et al., Liposome: Methods of Preparation and Applications. (IJPSR (2012) 3(2):14-20). |
| Durand et al., Circular dichroism studies of an oligodeoxyribonucleotide containing a hairpin loop made of a hexaethylene glycol chain: conformation and stability. Nucl. Acids Res. 1990;18(21): 6353-9. |
| Eckstein, Oligonucleotides and Analogues, 1st Ed. (Oxford University Press, New York) (1991). |
| Elbakry, A. et al., “Layer-by-Layer Assembled Gold Nanoparticles for siRNA Delivery,” Nano Lett., 2009, 9 (5), 2059-2064. |
| Elghanian et al., Selective colorimetric detection of polynucleotides based on the distance-dependent optical properties of gold nanoparticles. Science. 1997;277(5329):1078-81. |
| Eltoukhy et al., Nucleic acid-mediated intracellular protein delivery by lipid-like nanoparticles. Biomaterials. Aug. 2014;35(24):6454-61. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.014. Epub May 13, 2014. |
| Englisch et al., “Chemically Modified Oligonucleotides as Probes and Inhibitors” Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, 30:613-629 (1991). |
| Fan et al., Immunization via hair follicles by topical application of naked DNA to normal skin. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17(9):870-872. doi:10.1038/12856. |
| Fattal et al., Biodegradable polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles for the delivery of oligonucleotides. J. Controlled Release. 1998;53:137-143. |
| Ferentz et al., Disulfide-crosslinked oligonucleotides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991;113(10): 4000-2. |
| Ferrari, Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2005;5: 161-71. |
| Fishwick et al., Phytochemistry vol. 16, Issue 10, 1977, pp. 1507-1510. |
| Forman et al., Toward Artificial Ion Channels: A Lipophilic G-Quadruplex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122(17):4060-4067. DOI: 10.1021/ja9925148. |
| Forsbach et al., Identification of RNA sequence motifs stimulating sequence-specific TLR8-dependent immune responses. J Immunol. Mar. 15, 2008;180(6):3729-38. |
| Freier et al., The ups and downs of nucleic acid duplex stability: structure-stability studies on chemically-modified DNA:RNA duplexes, Nucleic Acids Research, 25:4429-43 (1997). |
| Freier et al., The ups and downs of nucleic acid duplex stability: structure-stability studies on chemically-modified DNA:RNA duplexes. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997;25(22):4429-4443. |
| Ghosh et al., Gold nanoparticles in delivery applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008;60(11):1307-15. |
| Gibson et al., Paclitaxel-functionalized gold nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129(37):11653-61. |
| Giljohann et al., Gene regulation with polyvalent siRNA-nanoparticle conjugates. J Am Chem Soc. Feb. 18, 2009;131(6):2072-3. |
| Giljohann et al., Gold nanoparticles for biology and medicine. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Apr. 26, 2010;49(19):3280-94. doi: 10.1002/anie.200904359. |
| Giljohann et al., Oligonucleotide loading determines cellular uptake of DNA-modified gold nanoparticles. Nano Lett. Dec. 2007;7(12):3818-21. Epub Nov. 13, 2007. |
| Gissot et al., Nucleoside, nucleotide and oligonucleotide based amphiphiles: a successful marriage of nucleic acids with lipids. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008;6:1324-33. |
| Godard, G. et al., “Antisense Effects of Cholesterol-Oligodeoxynucleotide Conjugates Associated with Poly(alkylcyanoacrylate) Nanoparticles,” Eur. J. Biochem., 1995, 232 (2), 404-410. |
| Goncalves et al., Uptake of high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesteryl esters by human acute leukemia cells. Leuk Res. Aug. 2005;29(8):955-9. Epub Feb. 24, 2005. |
| Goodrich et al., Non-coding-RNA regulators of RNA polymerase II transcription. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006;7(8):612-6. |
| Gramzinski et al., Interleukin-12 and gamma interferon-dependent protection against malaria conferred by CpG oligodeoxynucleotide in mice. Infection and Immunity. Mar. 2001:1643-9. |
| Graziani et al., Uptake of a cholesterol-rich emulsion by breast cancer. Gynecol Oncol. Jun. 2002;85(3):493-7. |
| Greish, Enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for anticancer nanomedicine drug tarqetinq, Methods Mal. Biol. 624:25-37 (2010). |
| Grijalvo et al., Oligonucleotide delivery: a patent review (2010-2013). Expert Opin Ther Pat. Jul. 2014;24(7):801-19. doi:10.1517/13543776.2014.915944. Epub May 5, 2014. |
| Gryaznov, Oligonucleotide n3′.fwdarw.p5′ phosphoramidates and thio-phoshoramidates as potential therapeutic agents. Chem Biodivers. Mar. 2010;7(3):477-93. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200900187. Review. |
| Guiducci et al., Properties regulating the nature of the plasmacytoid dendritic cell response to Toll-like receptor 9 activation. J Exp Med. Aug. 7, 2006;203(8):1999-2008. Epub Jul. 24, 2006. |
| Gunnarsson et al., Liposome-Based Chemical barcodes for Single Molecule DNA Detection Using imaging Mass Spectrometry, Nano. Lett. 2010;10:732-37. |
| Gursel et al., Repetitive elements in mammalian telomeres suppress bacterial DNA-induced immune activation. J Immunol. Aug. 1, 2003;171(3):1393-400. |
| Hammond et al., An RNA-directed nuclease mediates post-transcriptional gene silencing in Drosophilia cells. Nature. 2000;404: 293-6. |
| Han et al., Drug and gene delivery using gold nanoparticles. NanoBiotechnology. Mar. 2007;3(1):40-5. |
| Hartmann et al., Delineation of a CpG phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotide for activating primate immune responses in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol. Feb. 1, 2000;164(3):1617-24. |
| Hayashi, Ultrafine particles. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 1987;5(4):1375-1384. |
| He et al., Phospholipid-stabilized Au-nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules. May-Jun. 2005;6(3):1224-5. |
| Hegner et al., Modified DNA immobilized on bioreactive self-assembled monolayer on gold for dynamic force microscopy imaging in aqueous buffer solution. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 1996;14(2):1418-21. |
| Heil et al., Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8. Science. Mar. 5, 2004;303(5663):1526-9. Epub Feb. 19, 2004. |
| Hellstrom et al., Epitaxial growth of DNA-assembled nanoparticle superlattices on patterned substrates. Nano Lett. 2013;13(12):6084-90. doi: 10.1021/n14033654. Epub Nov. 20, 2013. |
| Hill et al., “Controlling the Lattice Parameters of Gold Nanoparticle FCC Crystals with Duplex DNA Linkers,” Nano Lett 8(8): 2341-2344 (2008). |
| Hong et al., Directed Assembly of Nucleic Acid-Based Polymeric Nanoparticles from Molecular Tetravalent Cores, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137:8184-91 (2015). |
| Hope et al., Production of large unilamellar vesicles by a rapid extrusion procedures; characterization of size distribution, trapped volume and ability to maintain a membrane potential. Biochim Biophys Acta. Jan. 10, 1985;812(1):55-65. Abstractonly. |
| Hotz et al., VEGF antisense therapy inhibits tumor growth and improves survival in experimental pancreatic cancer. Surgery. Feb. 2005;137(2):192-9. |
| Houot et al., T-cell modulation combined with intratumoral CpG cures lymphoma in a mouse model without the need for chemotherapy. Blood. Apr. 2009;113(15):3546-52. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-170274. Epub Oct. 21, 2008. |
| Hsu et al., Delivery of siRNA and other macromolecules into skin and cells using a peptide enhancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(38):15816-15821. doi:10.1073/pnas.1016152108. |
| Hurst et al., Maximizing DNA loading on a range of gold nanoparticle sizes, Anal. Chem. 2006;78:8313. |
| Hussain et al., A novel anionic dendrimer for improved cellular delivery of antisense oligonucleotides. J. Controlled Rel. 2004;99: 139-55. |
| Hwu et al., Targeted Paclitaxel by conjugation to iron oxide and gold nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc . . . 2009;131(1):66-8. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 20, 2017 for PCT/US2015/054288. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 31, 2017 for PCT/US2016/018395. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 4, 2016 for PCT/US2014/048291. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 4, 2016 for PCT/US2014/048294. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 12, 2017 for PCT/US2015/038771. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 25, 2018 for PCT/US2016/042291. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 27, 2017 for PCT/US2016/013365. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 13, 2016 for PCT/US2015/024255. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 28, 2017 for PCT/US2016/022579. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 24, 2017 for PCT/US2017/016084. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 25, 2017 for PCT/US2017/031428. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 3, 2016 for PCT/US2016/018395. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 15, 2014 for PCT/US2014/048291. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 17, 2014 for PCT/US2014/048294. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 10, 2017 for PCT/US2017/0274174. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 28, 2017 for PCT/US2017/031419. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 8, 2015 for PCT/US2015/024255. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 16, 2016 for PCT/US2016/013365. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 23, 2016 for PCT/US2016/022579. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 18, 2015 for PCT/US2015/054288. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 6, 2016 for PCT/US2016/042291. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 14, 2017 for PCT/US2017/031423. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 30, 2015 for PCT/US2015/038771. |
| Jackson et al., How do microRNAs regulate gene expression? Sci STKE. 2007(367):rel. |
| Jahn et al., Microfluidic directed formation of liposomes of controlled size. Langmuir. May 22, 2007;23(11):6289-93. ; Epub Apr. 24, 2007. |
| Jain et al., Synthesis of protein-loaded hydrogel particles in an aqueous two-phase system for coincident antigen and CpG oligonucleotide delivery to antigen-presenting cells. Biomacromolecules. Sep.-Oct. 2005;6(5):2590-600. |
| Jakobsen et al., Assembly of liposomes controlled by triple helix formation, Bioconjugate Chem. 2013;24:1485-95. |
| Jaschke et al., Automated incorporation of polyethylene glycol in synthetic oligonucleotides. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993;34: 301-4. |
| Jason et al., Toxicology of antisense therapeutics. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2004;201(1): 66-83. |
| Jayawickramarajah et al., Allosteric control of self-assembly: modulating the formation of guanine quadruplexes through orthogonal aromatic interactions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2007;46(40):7583-6. |
| Jensen et al., Spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates as an RNAi-based therapy for glioblastoma, Sci. Trans. Med., 5:209ra152 (2013). |
| Jeong et al., Novel intracellular delivery system of antisense oligonucleotide by self-assembled hybrid micelles composed of DNA/PEG conjugate and cationic fusogenic peptide. Bioconjugate Chem. 2003;14: 473-9. |
| Jin et al., Radiosensitization of paclitaxel, etanidazole and paclitaxel+etanidazole nanoparticles on hypoxic human tumor cells in vitro. Biomaterials. 2007;28(25):3724-30. |
| Kaczmarek et al., 2,-Linking of lipids and other functions to uridine through 1,2,3-triazoles and membrane anchoring of the amphiphilic products. Eur J Org Chem. Mar. 1, 2010; 2010(8):1579-86. DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.200901073. |
| Kan et al., Role of Kupffer cells in iodized oil embolization. Invest. Radiol. 1994;29(11 ):990-3. |
| Kandimalla et al., Secondary structures in CpG oligonucleotides affect immunostimulatory activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Jul. 11, 2003;306(4):948-53. |
| Kandimalla Immunostimulatory et al., Conjugation of Ligands at the 5′-End of CpG DNA Affects Immunostimulatory Activity. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2002 13 (5), 966-974. DOI: 10.1021/bc0200374. |
| Kanzler et al., Therapeutic targeting of innate immunity with Toll-like receptor agonists and antagonists. Nat Med. May 2007;13(5):552-9. |
| Karathanasis et al., Selective targeting of nanocarriers to neutrophils and monocytes. Ann Biomed Eng. Oct. 2009;37(10):1984-92. doi: 10.1007/s10439-009-9702-5. Epub Apr. 23, 2009. |
| Kasuya et al., Chapter 8—Bio-nanocapsule-liposome conjugates for in vivo pinpoint drug and gene delivery. Methods Enzymol. 2009;464:147-66. |
| Katz et al., Integrated nanoparticle-biomolecule hybrid systems: synthesis, properties, and applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004;43: 6042-108. |
| Katzman et al., Cholesterol-dependent infection of Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines by Epstein-Barr virus. J Gen Virol. Nov. 2003;84(Pt 11):2987-92. |
| Kelly et al., Targeted Liposomal Drug Delivery to Monocytes and Macrophages. J Drug Delivery. 2011;1-11. |
| Kerkmann et al., Immunostimulatory properties of CpG-oligonucleotides are enhanced by the use of protamine nanoparticles. Oligonucleotides. 2006 Winter;16(4):313-22. |
| Khmelinskaia et al., Effect of anchor positioning on binding and diffusion of elongated 3D DNA nanostructures on lipid membranes. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. Apr. 13, 2016;49(19):194001. |
| Kim et al., Cationic solid lipid nanoparticles reconstituted from low density lipoprotein components for delivery of siRNA. Mol Pharm. Jul.-Aug. 2008;5(4):622-31. doi: 10.1021/mp8000233. Epub May 8, 2008. |
| Kim et al., Direct synthesis of polymer nanocapsules with a noncovalently tailorable surface. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2007;46(19):3471-4. |
| Kim et al., Direct synthesis of polymer nanocapsules: self-assembly of polymer hollow spheres through irreversible covalent bond formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132(28):9908-19. |
| Kim et al., Effect of bovine serum albumin on the stability of methotrexate-encapsulated liposomes, Arch. Pharmacal Res. 1991;14:336. |
| Kim, S. et al., “Systemic and Specific Delivery of Small Interfering RNAs to the Liver Mediated by Apolipoprotein A-I,” Mol. Ther., 2007, 15 (6), 1145-1152. |
| Kimura-Suda et al., Base-Dependent Competive Adsorption of Single-Stranded DNA on Gold. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2003;125: 9014-9015. |
| Kloosterman et al., In situ detection of miRNAs in animal embryos using LNA-modified oligonucleotide probes. Nat. Methods. 2006;3: 27-9. |
| Kolarova et al., Preparation of magnetic oligo (dT) particles. Biotechniques. 1996;20: 196-8. |
| Kong et al., Cationic lipid-coated gold nanoparticles as efficient and non-cytotoxic intracellular siRNA delivery vehicles. Pharm Res. Feb. 2012;29(2):362-74. doi: 10.1007/s11095-011-0554-y. Epub Aug. 13, 2011. |
| Krieg et al., CpG motifs in bacterial DNA trigger direct B-cell activation. Nature. Apr. 6, 1995;374(6522):546-9. doi: 10.1038/374546a0. |
| Krieg et al., Sequence motifs in adenoviral DNA block immune activation by stimulatory CpG motifs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct. 13, 1998;95(21):12631-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12631. |
| Krieg. Antiinfective applications of toll-like receptor 9 agonists. Proc Am Thorac Soc. Jul. 2007;4(3):289-94. |
| Krug et al. Identification of CpG oligonucleotide sequences with high induction of IFN-alpha/beta in plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol. Jul. 2001;31(7):2154-63. |
| Krutzfeldt et al., Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with ‘antagomirs’. Nature. 2005;438(7068):685-9. |
| Landfester et al., From polymeric particles to multifunctional nanocapsules for biomedical applications using the miniemulsion process. J. Polymer Sci. Part A.2010; 48(3):493-515. |
| Langer. New methods of drug delivery. Science. Sep. 28, 1990;249(4976):1527-33. |
| Laquini et al., iPreparation, Characterization and Applications of Liposomes: State of the Art. J Colloid Sci and Biotechnol. 2012;1:147-68. |
| Leander, D., “Mixed-Monolayer Gold Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapeutics,” Nanoscape, 2010, 7 (1), 11-14. |
| Lebedeva et al., Antisense oligonucleotides: Promise and reality. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2001;41: 403-19. |
| Lee et al., A DNA-Gold Nanoparticle-Based Colormetric Competition Assay for the Detection of Cysteine. Nano Letter. 2008;8(2):529-533. |
| Lee et al., All-in-one target-cell-specific magnetic nanoparticles for simultaneous molecular imaging and siRNA delivery. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48(23):4174-9. doi:10.1002/anie.200805998. |
| Lee et al., Chip-based scanometric detection of mercuric ion using DNA-functionalized gold nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2008;80(17):6805-8. |
| Lee et al., Colorimetric detection of mercuric ion (Hg2+) in aqueous media using DNA-functionalized gold nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2007;46(22):4093-6. |
| Lee, IH, Kwon HK, an S, Kim D, Kim S, Yu MK, Lee JH, Lee TS, Im SH, Jon S. Imageable antigen-presenting gold nanoparticle vaccines for effective cancer immunotherapy in vivo. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Aug. 27, 2012;51(35):8800-5. doi:10.1002/anie.201203193. |
| Lenert et al., Inhibitory oligonucleotides block the induction of AP-1 transcription factor by stimulatory CpG oligonucleotides in B cells. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 2003;13(3):143-50. |
| Lennox et al., Characterization of modified antisense oligonucleotides in Xenopus laevis embryos. Oligonucleotides. 2006 Spring;16(1):26-42. |
| Leon et al., Alterations in cholesterol regulation contribute to the production of intratumoral androgens during progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer in a mouse xenograft model. Prostate. Mar. 1, 2010;70(4):390-400. doi:10.1002/pros.21072. |
| Lesieur et al., Size analysis and stability study of lipid vesicles by high-performance gel exclusion chromatography, turbidity, and dynamic light scattering. Anal Biochem. Feb. 1, 1991;192(2):334-43. |
| Leslie et al., A new tool for oligonucleotides import into cells. Clin. Chem. 2009;55: 609-10. |
| Lewandowski et al., Topically delivered spherical nucleic acid nanoconjugates targeting TNF improve the psoriatic phenotype. J Invest Dermatol. 2015 135:S71. Abstract 413. |
| Lewis, Controlled release of bioactive agents from lactide/glycolide polymer. pp. 1-41, in Chasin et al. (eds.), Biodegradable Polymers as Drug Delivery Systems, Marcel Dekker (1990). |
| Li et al., “Molecular spherical nucleic acids,” PNAS pp. 1-5 (2018). |
| Li et al., Combination delivery of antigens and CpG by lanthanides-based core-shell nanoparticles for enhanced immune response and dual-mode imaging. Adv Healthc Mater. Oct. 2013;2(10):1309-13. doi:10.1002/adhm.201200364. Epub Mar. 25, 2013. |
| Li et al., Dual-reactive surfactant used for synthesis of functional nanocapsules in miniemulsion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132(23):7823-5. |
| Li et al., Molecular spherical nucleic acids. Proc Nati Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 24, 2018; 115(17):4340-4344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801836115. Epub Apr. 9, 2018. |
| Li et al., Nanofabrication by DNA self-assembly. Materials Today. Elsevier Science. May 1, 2009;12(5)24-32. |
| Li et al., Nucleolin-targeting liposomes guided by aptamer AS1411 for the delivery of siRNA for the treatment of malignant melanomas. Biomaterials. Apr. 2014;35(12):3840-50. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.019. Epub Jan. 31, 2014. |
| Li et al., Reversible and Chemically Programmable Micelle Assembly with DNA Block-Copolymer Amphiphiles, Nano Lett. 2004;4:1055. |
| Li et al., Targeted delivery of antisense oligodeoxynucleotide and small interference RNA into lung cancer cells. Mol Pharm. Sep.-Oct. 2006;3(5):579-88. doi: 10.1021/mp060039w. Publication Date:Jul. 12, 2006. |
| Lin et al., Effector/memory but not naive regulatory T cells are responsible for the loss of concomitant tumor immunity. J. Immunol. 2009;182: 6095-104. |
| Lin et al., Gold nanoparticle delivery of modified CpG stimulates macrophages and inhibits tumor growth for enhanced immunotherapy. PLoS One. May 15, 2013;8(5):e63550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063550. Print 2013. |
| Lin et al., Modeling genomic diversity and tumor dependency in malignant melanoma. Cancer Res. 2003;68: 664-73. |
| Link et al., Size and Temperature Dependence of the Plasmon Absorption of Colloidal Gold Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1999;103(21):4212-7. |
| Linse et al., Temperature-dependent micellization in aqueous block copolymer solutions, Macromolecules. 25:5434-5439 (1992). |
| Liu et al., Argonaute2 is the catalytic engine of mammalian RNAi. Science. 2004;305(5689): 1437-41. |
| Liu et al., Bioconjugated pluronic triblock-copolymer micelle-encapsulated quantum dots for targeted imaging of cancer: in vitro and in vivo studies, Theranostics. 2:705-13 (2012). |
| Liu et al., DNA-based micelles: synthesis, micellar properties and size-dependent cell permeability, Chemistry. 2010;16:3791-7. |
| Liu et al., Membrane anchored immunostimulatory oligonucleotides for in vivo cell modification and localized immunotherapy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Jul. 25, 2011;50(31):7052-5. doi: 10.1002/anie.201101266. Epub Jun. 17, 2011. |
| Liu et al., New Poly(D-glucaramidoamine)s Induce DNA Nanoparticle Formation and Efficient Gene Delivery into Mammalian Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:7422-7423. |
| Liu et al., Structure-based programming of lymph-node targeting in molecular vaccines. Nature. Mar. 27, 2014;507(7493):519-22. doi: 10.1038/nature12978. |
| Liu et al., Synthesis, stability, and cellular internalization of gold nanoparticles containing mixed peptide-poly( ethylene glycol) monolayers. Anal. Chem. 2007;79: 2221-9. |
| Liu, J. et al., Silica Nanoparticle Supported Lipid Bilayers for Gene Delivery, Chem. Commun., 2009, 5100-5102. |
| Ljubimova et al., Nanoconjugate based on polymalic acid for tumor targeting. Chem Biol Interact. Jan. 30, 20080;171(2):195-203. Epub Feb. 8, 2007. |
| Luo et al., Synthetic DNA delivery systems. Nat Biotechnol. Jan. 2000;18(1):33-7. |
| Luthi et al., Nanotechnology for synthetic high-density lipoproteins. Trens Mol Med. Dec. 2010;16(12):553-60. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.10.006. Epub Nov. 17, 2010. |
| Lytton-Jean et al., A thermodynamic investigation into the binding properties of DNA functionalized gold nanoparticle probes and molecular fluorophore probes. J Am Chem Soc. Sep. 21, 2005;127(37):12754-5. |
| Lytton-Jean et al., Highly Cooperative Behavior of Peptide Nucleic Acid-Linked DNA-Modified Gold-Nanoparticle and Comb-Polymer Aggregates, Advanced Materials, 21: 706 (2009). |
| Ma et al., Design and synthesis of RNA miniduplexes via a synthetic linker approach. 2. Generation of covalently closed, double-stranded cyclic HIV-1 TAR RNA analogs with high Tat-binding affinity. Nucl. Acids Res. 1993;21: 2585-9. |
| Ma et al., Design and synthesis of RNA miniduplexes via a synthetic linker approach. Biochemistry. 1993;32(7): 1751-8. |
| Major, M. et al., “Characterisation and Phase Behaviour of Phospholipid Bilayers Adsorbed on Spherical Polysaccharidic Nanoparticles,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1997, 1327, 32-40. |
| Mangsbo et al., Enhanced tumor eradication by combining CTLA-4 or PD-1 blockade with CpG therapy. J Immunother. Apr. 2010;33(3):225-35. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181c01fcb. |
| Manoharan et al., Lipidic nucleic acids. Tetrahedron Letters. May 22, 1995;36(21):3651-4. |
| Marabelle et al. Depleting tumor-specific Tregs at a single site eradicates disseminated tumors, J Clin Invest. 2013; 123(6):2447-2463. |
| Marshall et al., Novel chimeric immunomodulatory compounds containing short CpG oligodeoxyribonucleotides have differential activities in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. Sep. 1, 2003;31(17):5122-33. |
| Martin et al., Ein neur Zugang zu 2′-O-alkylribonucleosiden and Eigenschaften deren oligonucleotide Hely, Chim. Acta, 78:486-504 (1995). |
| Martinson et al., Impact of Class A, B and C CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides on in vitro activation of innate immune cells in human immunodeficiency virus-1 infected individuals. Immunology. 2007;120(4):526-35. |
| Massich et al., Cellular response of polyvalent oligonucleotide-gold nanoparticle conjugates, ACS Nano. 4:5641-6 (2010). |
| Massich et al., Regulating immune response using polyvalent nucleic acid-gold nanoparticle conjugates. Mol Pharm. Nov.-Dec. 2009;6(6):1934-40. |
| Matijevic et al., Fine Particles Part II: Formation Mechanisms and Applications. MRS Bulletin pp. 16-47 (1990). |
| Mayer et al., Nucleic Acid and Peptide Aptamers: Methods and Protocols (Edited by Mayer, Humana Press) Methods in Molecular Bioloav (2009). 404 pages. |
| McAllister et al., Polymeric nanogels produced via inverse microemulsion polymerization as potential gene and antisense delivery agents, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124:15198 (2002). |
| McBain, S. et al., “Polyethyleneimine Functionalized Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as Agents for DNA Deliver and Transfection,” J. Mater. Chem., 2007, 17, 2561-2565. |
| McKay et al., Characterization of a potent and specific class of antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of human protein kinase C-alpha expression. J Biol Chem. Jan. 15, 1999;274(3):1715-22. |
| Mendell, MicroRNAs: critical regulators of development, cellular physiology and malignancy. Cell Cycle. 2005;4(9):1179-84. |
| Ming et al., Albumin-based nanoconjugates for targeted delivery of ; therapeutic oligonucleotides. Biomaterials. Oct. 2013;34(32):7939-49. doi:; 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.066. Epub Jul. 19, 2013. |
| Mohamed et al., Effect of toll-like receptor 7 and 9 targeted therapy to prevent the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. Mar. 2015;35(3):1063-76. doi: 10.1111/liv.12626. Epub Jul. 30, 2014. |
| Monia et al., Nuclease resistance and antisense activity of modified oligonucleotides targeted to Ha-ras. J Biol Chem. Jun. 14, 2014;271(24):14533-40. |
| Mozos et al., The expression of the endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor BiP/GRP78 predicts response to chemotherapy and determines the efficacy of proteasome inhibitors in diffuse large b-cell lymphoma. Am J Pathol. Nov. 2011;179(5):2601-10.doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.07.031. Epub Sep. 9, 2011. |
| Mui et al., Immune stimulation by a CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotide is enhanced when encapsulated and delivered in lipid particles. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. Sep. 2001;298(3):1185-92. |
| Mulas et al., Cholesterol esters as growth regulators of lymphocytic leukaemia cells. Cell Prolif. Aug. 2011;44(4):360-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2011.00758.x. Epub Jun. 6, 2011. |
| Munde et al., Induced fit conformational changes of a “reversed amidine” heterocycle: optimized interactions in a DNA minor groove complex. J Am Chem Soc. May 2, 2007;129(17):5688-98. Epub Apr. 11, 2007. |
| Nam et al., Nanoparticle-based bio-bar codes for the ultrasensitive detection of proteins. Science. Sep. 26, 2003;301(5641):1884-6. |
| Niemeyer, C. et al., “Bifunctional DNA-Gold Nanoparticle Conjugates as Building Blocks for the Self-Assembly of Cross-Linked Particle Layers,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2003, 311 (4), 995-999. |
| Nikolov et al., Bias-dependent admittance in hybrid bilayer membranes. Langmuir Aug. 2006.15;22(17):7156-8. |
| Ohishi et al., Hepatocellular carcinoma detected by iodized oil. Use of anticancer agents. Radiology. 1985;154(1):25-9. |
| Okayasu et al., Selective and persistent deposition and gradual drainage of iodized oil, Lipiodol in the hepatocellular carcinoma after injection into the feeding hepatic artery. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1988;90(5):536-44. |
| Opalinska et al., Nucleic-acid therapeutics: basic principles and recent applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2002;1: 503-14. |
| Opdahl et al., Independent control of grafting density and conformation of single-stranded DNA brushes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 2007;104: 9-14. |
| Osman et al., Morpholino antisense oligonucleotides targeting intronic repressor Element1 improve phenotype in SMA mouse models. Human Molecular Genetics. 2014;23(18):4832-45. |
| Ozpolat et al., Nanomedicine based approaches for the delivery of siRNA in cancer. J. Intern. Med. 2010;267(1):44-53. |
| Parrish et al., Soluble Camptothecin Derivatives Prepared by Click Cycloaddition Chemistry on Functional Aliphatic Polyesters. Bioconjugate Chem. 2006;18: 263-267. |
| Patel et al., Peptide antisense nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov. 11, 2011;105(45):17222-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801609105. |
| Patel et al., Scavenger receptors mediate cellular uptake of polyvalent oligonucleotide-functionalized gold nanoparticles, Bioconj. Chem., 21:2250 (2010). |
| Patil et al., “Evidence for Novel Interdigitated Bilayer Formation of Fatty Acids During Three-Dimensional Self-Assembly on Silver Colloidal Particles,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119 (39), 9281-9282. |
| Patil et al., DNA-based therapeutics and DNA delivery systems: a comprehensive review. AAPS J., 2005;7(1): E61-77. |
| Patwa et al., Hybrid lipid oligonucleotide conjugates: synthesis, self-assemblies and biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:5844-54. |
| Paul, New Way to Kill Lymphoma without Chemotherapy uses Golden Nanoparticles. Feinberg School of Medicine: Northwestern University. Jan. 22, 2013 4 pages. ww.feinberg.northwestern.edu/news/2013/01/lymphoma_nanoparticales.html. |
| Periyasamy et al., Nanomaterials for the local and targeted delivery of osteoarthritis drugs. J Nanomater. 2012:2012:Article 673968. 13 pages. doi:0.1155/2012/673968. |
| Peter et al., Characterization of suppressive oligodeoxynucleotides that inhibit Toll-like receptor-9-mediated activation of innate immunity. Immunology. Jan. 2008;123(1):118-28. Epub Oct. 23, 2007. |
| Pfeiffer et al., Bivalent Cholesterol-Based Coupling of Oligonucleotides to Lipid Membrane Assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:10224-10225. |
| Pfeiffer et al., Quantification of oligonucleotide modifications of small unilamellar lipid vesicles. Anal. Chem. 2006;78:7493-8. |
| Plant et al., Self-assembled phospholipid/alkanethiol biomimetic bilayers on gold. Langmuir. 1993;9:2764-7. |
| Pokholenko et al., Lipid oligonucleotide conjugates as responsive nanomaterials for drug delivery. J of Materials Chemistry B. 2013;5329-34. |
| Polizzi et al., Water-soluble nitric oxide-releasing gold nanoparticles. Langmuir. Apr. 24, 2007;23(9):4938-43. Epub Mar. 22, 2007. |
| Pollard, A guide to simple and informative binding assays. Mol Biol Cell. Dec. 2010;21(23):4061-7. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-08-0683. |
| Ponnappa et al., Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor alpha secretion and prevention of liver injury in ethanol-fed rats by antisense oligonucleotides. Biochem Pharmacol. Feb. 15, 2005;69(4):569-77. Epub Dec. 30, 2004. |
| Prasad et al., Oligonucleotides tethered to a short polyguanylic acid stretch are targeted to macrophages: enhanced antiviral activity of a vesicular stomatitis virus-specific antisense oligonucleotide. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Nov. 1999;43(11):2689-96. |
| Prausnitz et al., Transdermal drug delivery, Nat. Biotechnol., 2008;26: 1261-8. |
| Radovic-Moreno et al., Immunomodulatory spherical nucleic acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar. 31, 2015;112(13):3892-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502850112. Epub Mar. 16, 2015. |
| Rajur et al., Covalent protein-oligonucleotide conjugates for efficient delivery of antisense molecules. Bioconjug Chem. Nov.-Dec. 1997;8(6):935-40. doi: 10.1021/bc970172u. |
| Ramos-Casals et al., Autoimmune diseases induced by TNF-targeted therapies: analysis of 233 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). Jul. 2007;86(4):242-51. |
| Rethore et al., Use of templates to fabricate nanoscale spherical structures for defined architectural control. Small, 2010;6(4):488-98. |
| Rojanasakul et al., Antisense inhibition of silica-induced tumor necrosis factor in alveolar macrophages. J Biol Chem. Feb. 14, 1997;272(7):3910-4. |
| Romanucci et al., Synthesis, biophysical characterization and anti-HIV activity of d(TG3AG) Quadruplexes bearing hydrophobic tails at the 5′-end. Bioorg Med Chem. Feb. 1, 2014;22(3):960-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.12.051. Epub Jan. 4, 2014. |
| Rosi et al., Nanostructures in biodiagnostics, Chem. Rev., 105:1547 (2005). |
| Rosi et al., Oligonucleotide-modified gold nanoparticles for intracellular gene regulation. Science. May 19, 2006;312(5776):1027-30. |
| Rothblat et al., Cell cholesterol efflux: integration of old and new observations provides new insights. J Lipid Res. May 1999;40(5):781-96. |
| Rothrock et al., Synthesis of nitric oxide-releasing gold nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. Jul. 6, 2005;127(26):9362-3. |
| Rubenstein et al., Antisense oligonucleotide intralesional therapy for human PC-3 prostate tumors carried in athymic nude mice. J Surg Oncol. Jul. 1996;62(3):194-200. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199607)62:3<194::AID-JS09>3.0.CO;2-2. |
| Rush et al., Intracellular mRNA regulation with self-assembled locked nucleic acid polymer nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. May 28, 2014;136(21):7615-8. doi: 10.1021/ja503598z. Epub May 14, 2014. |
| Saraiva et al., Nanocarriers for nitric oxide delivery. J Drug Deliv. 2011;2011:936438. doi: 10.1155/2011/936438. Epub Aug. 22, 2011. |
| Schieren et al., Comparison of large unilamellar vesicles prepared by a petroleum ether vaporization method with multilamellar vesicles: ESR, diffusion and entrapment analyses. Biochim Biophys Acta. Aug. 3, 1978;542(1):137-53. |
| Schifferlers et al., Cancer siRNA therapy by tumor selective delivery with ligand-targeted sterically stabilized nanoparticle. Nucl. Acid Res., 2004;32(19): e149. |
| Schmidt, Clinical setbacks for toll-like receptor 9 agonists in cancer. Nat Biotechnol. Aug. 2007;25(8):825-6. Epub Aug. 2, 2007. |
| Schwab et al., An approach for new anticancer drugs: Oncogene-targered antisense DNA. Ann Oncol. 1994;5(Suppl4):S55-8. |
| Seela et al., Oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing 1,3-propanediol as nucleoside substitute. Nucl. Acids Res., 1987;15(7): 3113-29. |
| Seeman, “An Overview of Structural DNA Nanotechnology,” Mol Biotechnol 37(3): 246-257 (2007). |
| Seferos et al., Locked nucleic acid-nanoparticle conjugates, Chem. Bio. Chem., 8:1230 (2007). |
| Seferos et al., Polyvalent DNA nanoparticle conjugates stabilize nucleic acids. Nano Lett. Jan. 2009;9(1):308-11. |
| Senior et al., Stability of small unilamellar liposomes in serum and clearance from the circulation: the effect of the phospholipid and cholesterol components, Life Sci. 30:2123 (1982). |
| Shahzad et al., Targeted delivery of small interfering RNA using reconstituted high-density lipoprotein nanoparticles. Neoplasia. Apr. 2011;13(4):309-19. |
| Sharma et al., Targeting mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase in the mutant (V600E) B-Raf signaling cascade effectively inhibits melanoma lung metastases. Cancer Res., 2006;66: 8200-9. |
| Shin et al., pH-responsive high-density lipoprotein-like nanoparticles to release paclitaxel at acidic pH in cancer chemotherapy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:2805-16. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S29817. Epub Jun. 6, 2012. |
| Shukoor et al., CpG-DNA loaded multifunctional MnO nanoshuttles for TLR9-specific cellular cargo delivery, selective immune-activation and MRI. J. Mater. Chem., 2012,22, 8826-8834. |
| Sigalov, A novel ligand-independent peptide inhibitor of TREM-1 suppresses tumor growth in human lung cancer xenografts and prolongs survival of mice with lipopolysaccharide-induced septic shock. Int Immunopharmacol. Jul. 2014:21(10:208-19. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2014.05.001. Epub May 14, 2014. |
| Sokolova et al., The use of calcium phosphate nanoparticles encapsulating Toll-like receptor ligands and the antigen hemagglutinin to induce dendritic cell maturation and T cell activation. Biomaterials. Jul. 2010;31(21):5627-33. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.067.Epub Apr. 24, 2010. |
| Song et al., Backbone-modified oligonucleotides for tuning the cellular uptake behaviour of spherical nucleic acids. Biomater Sci. Feb. 28, 2017;5(3):412-416. doi: 10.1039/c6bm00792a. |
| Sood, ‘Good cholesterol’ nanoparticles seek and destroy cancer cells. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. 2011. Downloaded Apr. 4, 2011. http://healthorbit.ca/newsdetail.asp?opt=1&nltid=164032911. |
| Stahl et al., Deregulated Akt3 activity promotes development of malignant melanoma. Cancer Res., 2004;64: 7002-10. |
| Stengel et al., Determinants for Membrane Fusion Induced by Cholesterol-Modified DNA Zippers, J. Phys. Chem. B., 112:8264-74 (2008). |
| Stengel et al., DNA-Induced Programmable Fusion of Phospholipid Vesicles, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129:9584-5 (2007). |
| Stephenson et al., Inhibition of Rous sarcoma viral RNA translation by a specific oligodeoxyribonucleotide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1978;75(1): 285-8. |
| Stoeva et al., Multiplexed detection of protein cancer markers with biobarcoded nanoparticle probes. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006;128: 8378-9. |
| Storhoff et al., One-pot colorimetric differentiation of polynucleotides with single base imperfections using gold nanoparticle probes. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998;120:1959-64. |
| Storhoff et al., Sequence-Dependent Stability of DNA-Modified Gold Nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2002;18: 6666-6670. |
| Storhoff et al., What controls the optical properties of DNA-linked gold nanoparticle assemblies? J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000;122: 4640-50. |
| Storz et al., An abundance of RNA regulators. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 2005;74:199-217. |
| Stunz et al., Inhibitory oligonucleotides specifically block effects of stimulatory CpG oligonucleotides in B cells. Eur J Immunol. May 2002;32(5):1212-22. |
| Sugihara et al., One-pot synthesis of biomimetic shell cross-linked micelles and nanocages by ATRP in alcohol/water mixtures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2010;48(20):3500-3. |
| Sulkowski et al., The influence of temperature, cholesterol content and pH on liposome stability, J. Mol. Struct., 744-747: 737 (2005). |
| Sundaram et al., Particle-mediated delivery of recombinant expression vectors to rabbit skin induces high-titered polyclonal antisera (and circumvents purification of a protein immunogen). Nucl. Acids Res., 1996;24(7): 1375-7. |
| Switaj et al., CpG immunostimulatory oligodeoxynucleotide 1826 enhances antitumor effect of interleukin 12 gene-modified tumor vaccine in a melanoma model in mice. Clin Cancer Res. Jun. 15, 2004;10(12 Pt 1):4165-75. |
| Tan et al., Facile synthesis of hybrid silica nanocapsules by interfacial templating condensation and their application in fluorescence imaging. Chem. Commun. (Camb.), Nov. 2009; 7(41):6240-2. |
| Taton et al., Scanometric DNA array detection with nanoparticle probes. Science, 2000;289(5485):1757-60. |
| Thompson et al. Nano Lett. 10, 2690-2693 (Year: 2010). |
| Tincer et al., Immunostimulatory activity of polysaccharide-poly(I:C) nanoparticles. Biomaterials. Jun. 2011;32(18):4275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.028.Epub Apr. 2, 2011. |
| Tiwari et at, Functionalized gold nanoparticles and their biomedical applications. Nanomaterials. 2011;1:31-63. doi: 10.3390/nano1010031. |
| Toh et al. Liposomes as sterile preparations and limitations of sterilisation techniques in liposomal manufacturing, Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (2013) 8(2):88-95. |
| Tondelli et al., “Highly efficient cellular uptake of c-myb antisense oligonucleotides through specifically desianed polymeric nanospheres,” Nucl. Acids Res. 26:5425-5431 (1998). |
| Tondelli, et al., Highly efficient cellular uptake of c-myb antisense oligonucleotides through specifically designed polymeric nanospheres. Nucl. Acids Res. 1998;26:5425-5431. |
| Tran et al., Targeting V600EB-Raf and Akt3 using nanoliposomal-small interfering RNA inhibits cutaneous melanocytic lesion development. Cancer Res. Sep. 15, 2008;68(18):7638-49. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6614. |
| Tripathy et al., High Density Lipoprotein Nanoparticles Deliver RNAi to Endothelial Cells to Inhibit Angiogenesis. Part Part Syst Charact. Nov. 1, 2014;31(11):1141-1150. |
| Trong et al., Mechanisms of micellization and rheology of PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymers with various architectures, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 328:278-87 (2008). |
| Turberfield et al., DNA fuel for free-running nanomachines. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2003;90: 118102. |
| Versluis et al., In situ modification of plain liposomes with lipidated coiled coil forming peptides induces membrane fusion, J. Am. Chem. Soc . . . 135:8057 (2013). |
| Virmani et al., Comparison of two different methods for inoculating VX2 tumors in rabbit livers and hind limbs. J. Vase. Interv. Radial., 2008;19(6):931-6. |
| Vorobjev et al., Nuclease resistance and RNase H sensitivity of oligonucleotides bridged by oligomethylenediol and oligoethylene glycol linkers. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. Apr. 2001;11(2):77-85. |
| Wang et al., Co-delivery of drugs and DNA from cationic core-shell nanoparticles self-assembled from a biodegradable copolymer. Nat Mater. Oct. 2006;5(10):791-6. doi: 10.1038/nmat1737. Epub Sep. 24, 2006. PMID: 16998471. |
| Wang et al., Doxorubicin-tethered responsive gold nanoparticles facilitate intracellular drug delivery for overcoming multidrug resistance in cancer cells. ACS Nano. May 24, 2011;5(5):3679-92. doi: 10.1021/nn200007z. Epub Apr. 12, 2011. |
| Wang, Synthetic CPG ODNs activate immune cells through the Toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway. Integrated DNA Technologies. 2019. |
| Wei et al., Polyvalent immunostimulatory nanoagents with self-assembled CpG oligonucleotide-conjugated gold nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Jan. 27, 2012;51(5):1202-6. doi:10.1002/anie.201105187. Epub Dec. 21, 2011. |
| West et al., Recognition and signaling by toll-like receptors. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006;22:409-37. |
| Whitehead et al., Knocking down barriers: advances in siRNA delivery, Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov., 8:129 (2009). |
| Willis et al., Liposome-Anchored Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aptamers. Bioconjugate Chem. 1998;9(5):573-82. |
| Wilson et al., pH-Responsive nanoparticle vaccines for dual-delivery of antigens and immunostimulatory oligonucleotides. ACS Nano. May 28, 2013;7(5):3912-25. doi: 10.1021/nn305466z. Epub Apr. 30, 2013. |
| Wilton et al. Antisense oligonucleotide-induced exon skipping across the human dystrophin gene transcript. Mol Ther. Jul. 2007;15(7):1288-96. Epub Feb. 6, 2007. |
| Wolfe et al., Modulation of Tetraplex Formation by Chemical Modifications of a G4-Containing Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6301-6302 (Year: 1996). |
| Wolfrum et al., Mechanisms and optimization of in vivo delivery of lipophilic siRNAs. Nat Biotechnol. Oct. 2007;25(10):1149-57. Epub Sep. 16, 2007. |
| Wu et al., DNA aptamer-micelle as an efficient detection/delivery vehicle toward cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jan. 5, 2010;107(1):5-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909611107. Epub Dec. 22, 2009. |
| Wu et al., Intracellular fate of spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates. J Am Chem Soc. May 28, 2014;136(21):7726-33. doi: 10.1021/ja503010a. Epub May 19, 2014. |
| Xia, Nanomaterials at work in biomedical research. Nat. Mater., 2008;7(10):758-60. |
| Xiao et al., Mannosylated bioreducible nanoparticle-mediated macrophage-specific TNF-.alpha. RNA interference for IBD therapy. Biomaterials. Oct. 2013;34(30):7471-82. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.008. Epub Jun. 29, 2013. |
| Xing et al., Selective delivery of an anticancer drug with aptamer-functionalized liposomes to breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, J. Mater. Chem. B., 1:5288 (2013). |
| Xu et al., Thermodynamics of DNA hybridization on gold nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005;127(38): 13227-31. |
| Yamamoto et al., Unique palindromic sequences in synthetic oligonucleotides are required to induce IFN [correction of INF] and augment IFN-mediated [correction of INF] natural killer activity. J Immunol. Jun. 15, 1992;148(12):4072-6. |
| Yang et al., Biomimetic, synthetic HDL nanostructures for lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb. 12, 2013;110(7):2511-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213657110. Epub Jan. 23, 2013. |
| Yang et al., Evidence that processed small dsRNAs may mediate sequence-specific mRNA degradation during RNAi in Drosophila embryos. Curr. Biol., 2000;10: 1191-200. |
| Yang et al., Inhibition of a C-rich oligodeoxynucleotide on activation of immune cells in vitro and enhancement of antibody response in mice. Immunology. Dec. 2010;131(4):501-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03322.x. |
| Yin et al., Supramolecular self-assembled nanoparticles mediate oral delivery of therapeutic TNF-.alpha. siRNA against systemic inflammation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. May 27, 2013;52(22):5757-61. doi: 10.1002/anie.201209991. Epub Apr. 22, 2013. |
| Yin Win et al., Effects of particle size and surface coating on cellular uptake of polymeric nonparticles for oral delivery of anticancer drugs. Biomaterials, 2005;26: 2713-22. |
| Zabner et al., Cellular and molecular barriers to gene transfer by a cationic lipid. J. Biol. Chem., 1995;270: 18997-9007. |
| Zamecnik et al., Inhibition of Rous sarcoma virus replication and cell transformation by a specific oligodeoxynucleotide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1978;75(1): 280-4. |
| Zamore et al., RNAi: double-stranded RNA directs the ATP-dependent cleavage of mRNA at 21 to 23 nucleotide intervals. Cell, Mar. 31, 2000;101: 25-33. |
| Zhang et al., A general approach to DNA-programmable atom equivalents. Nature Materials. Aug. 2013;12(8):741-6. |
| Zhang et al., An extremely stable and orthogonal DNA base pair with a simplified three-carbon backbone. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005;127:74-75. |
| Zhang et al., Antibody-linked spherical nucleic acids for cellular targeting, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134:16488-91 (2012). |
| Zhang et al., Biomimetic nanocarrier for direct cytosolic drug delivery. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48(48):9171-5. |
| Zhang et al., Cationic shell-crosslinked knedel-like nanoparticles for highly efficient gene and oligonucleotide transfection of mammalian cells. Biomaterials, 2009;30(5):968-77. |
| Zhang et al., Informational liposomes: Complexes derived from cholesteryl-conjugated oligonucleotides and liposomes. Tetrahedron Letters. 1996. 37(35):6243-6. |
| Zhang et al., Nanopod formation through gold nanoparticle templated and catalyzed cross-linking of polymers bearing pendant propargyl ethers. J Am Chem Soc. Nov. 3, 2010;132(43):15151-3. |
| Zhang et al., Non-invasive multimodal functional imaging of the intestine with frozen micellar naphthalocyanines, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9:631-8 (2014). |
| Zhang et al., Structure-activity relationships of cationic shell-crosslinked knedel-like nanoparticles: shell composition and transfection efficiency/cytotoxicity, Biomaterials, 31:1805 (2010). |
| Zhang et al., TLR9-mediated siRNA delivery for targeting of normal and malignant human hematopoietic cells in vivo. Blood. Feb. 21, 2013;121(8):1304-15. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-442590. Epub Jan. 3, 2013. |
| Zheng et al., A spherical nucleic acid platform based on self-assembled DNA biopolymer for high-performance cancer therapy. ACS Nano. Aug. 27, 2013;7(8):6545-54. doi: n402344v. Epub Jul. 23, 2013. |
| Zheng et al., Sterically controlled docking of gold nanoparticles on ferritin; surface by DNA hybridization. Nanotechnology. Jul. 8, 2011;22(27):275312. doi:; 10.1088/0957-4484/22/27/275312. Epub May 26, 2011. |
| Zheng et al., Topical delivery of siRNA-based spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates for gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul. 24, 2012;109(30):11975-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118425109. Epub Jul. 6, 2012. |
| Zimmer, Antisense oligonucleotide delivery with polyhexylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles as carriers. Methods, 1999;18: 286-95. |
| Zimmermann, et al., A Novel Silver(1)-Mediated DNA Base Pair. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002; 124:13684-13685. |
| Aryan et al., A New Era of Targeting the Ancient Gatekeepers of the Immune System: Toll-Like Agonists in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology. 2014;164:46-63. Epub May 21, 2014. |
| Bakker et al., Identification of a novel peptide derived from the melanocyte-specific gp100 antigen as the dominant epitope recognized by an HLA-A2.1-restricted anti-melanoma CTL line. Int J Cancer. Jul. 4, 1995;62(1):97-102. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910620118. |
| Chan et al., Lipid-anchored DNA mediates vesicle fusion as observed by lipid and content mixing. Biointerphases. Jun. 2008;3(2):FA17. doi: 10.1116/1.2889062. |
| De Titta et al., Nanoparticle conjugation of CpG enhances adjuvancy for cellular immunity and memory recall at low dose. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec. 3, 2013;110(49):19902-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313152110. Epub Nov. 18, 2013. |
| Eisenhauer et al., New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. Jan. 2009;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. Epub Dec. 22, 2008. |
| Fang et al., Cancer cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for anticancer vaccination and drug delivery. Nano Lett. 2014;14(4):2181-8. Doi: 10.1021/n1500618u. Epub Mar. 28, 2014. |
| Goldberg, Immunoengineering: how nanotechnology can enhance cancer immunotherapy. Cell. Apr. 9, 2015;161(2):201-4. Doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.037. |
| Hirosue et al., Antigen delivery to dendritic cells by poly(propylene sulfide) nanoparticles with disulfide conjugated peptides: Cross-presentation and T cell activation. Vaccine. Nov. 23, 2010;28(50):7897-906. Doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.09.077. Epub Oct. 8, 2010. |
| Israelachvili et al., Physical principles of membrane organization. Q Rev Biophys. May 1980;13(2):121-200. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500001645. |
| Kim et al., pH-responsive biodegradable assemblies containing tunable phenyl-substituted vinyl ethers for use as efficient gene delivery vehicles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. Jun. 26, 2013;5(12):5648-58. Doi: 10.1021/am400977t. Epub Jun. 17, 2013. Author Manuscript, 28 pages. |
| Klinman et al., CpG motifs as immune adjuvants. Vaccine. Jan. 1999;17(1):19-25. Doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(98)00151-0. |
| Krieg et al., Induction of systemic TH1-like innate immunity in normal volunteers following subcutaneous but not intravenous administration of CPG 7909, a synthetic B-class CpG oligodeoxynucleotide TLR9 agonist. J Immunother. Nov.-Dec. 2004;27(6):460-71. doi: 10.1097/00002371-200411000-00006. |
| Krieg, CpG still rocks! Update on an accidental drugj. Nucleic Acid Ther. Apr. 2012;22(2):77-89. doi: 10.1089/nat.2012.0340. Epub Feb. 21, 2012. |
| Liu et al., Structure-based programming of lymph-node targeting in molecular vaccines. Nature. Mar. 27, 2014;507(7493):519-22. Doi: 10.1038/nature12978. Epub Feb. 16, 2014. Author Manuscript, 23 pages. |
| Ming et al., Bioconjugates for targeted delivery of therapeutic oligonucleotides. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. Jun. 29, 2015;87:81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.02.002. Epub Feb. 15, 2015. |
| Perrault et al., Mediating tumor targeting efficiency of nanoparticles through design. Nano Lett. May 2009;9(5):1909-15. Doi: 10.1021/n1900031y. |
| Radovic-Moreno et al., Immunomodulatory spherical nucleic acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A PNAS. Mar. 31, 2015;112(13):3892-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502850112. Epub Mar. 16, 2015. |
| Raouane et al., Lipid conjugated oligonucleotides: a useful strategy for delivery. Bioconjug Chem. Jun. 20, 2012;23(6):1091-104. doi: 10.1021/bc200422w. Epub Mar. 15, 2012. |
| Samadikhah et al., Preparation, characterization, and efficient transfection of cationic liposomes and nanomagnetic cationic liposomes. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:2275-83. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S23074. Epub Oct. 12, 2011. |
| Sharpe, Mechanisms of costimulation. Immunol Rev. May 2009;229(1):5-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00784.x. |
| Thompson et al., Safety and Efficacy of PF-3512676 for the Treatment of Stage IV Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Open-Label, Multicenter Phase I/II Study. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer. Oct. 1, 2009;7(3):E58-65. |
| Townson et al., Re-examining the size/charge paradigm: differing in vivo characteristics of size- and charge-matched mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. Oct. 30, 2013;135(43):16030-3. doi: 10.1021/ja4082414. Epub Oct. 16, 2013. Author Manuscript, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 18/019,857, filed Feb. 6, 2023, Anderson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 18/020,501, filed Feb. 9, 2023, Anderson et al. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220257512 A1 | Aug 2022 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62007528 | Jun 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16569007 | Sep 2019 | US |
| Child | 17405068 | US | |
| Parent | 15315538 | US | |
| Child | 16569007 | US |
