The present invention generally relates to munitions useable for attacking hard targets, such as buildings or fortifications.
Weapons for penetrating hard targets, such as buildings or fortifications having reinforced concrete walls, have generally used steel casings to survive challenging impact conditions against hardened target structures. Using solid steel cased cylindrical wall structures that protect the explosive payload during penetration has been the standard. However, this approach results in relatively low numbers of large naturally formed steel cased fragments upon warhead detonation inside the hardened target.
A warhead for a munition, such as a missile or bomb, has a penetration casing with reduced-thickness portions that selectively weaken parts of the casing. This allows enhanced formation of fragments from the casing when an explosive enclosed by the casing is detonated, such as after the warhead has penetrated a hardened target. The reduced-thickness portions may be non-intersecting portions where the casing has holes therein, or grooves on an outer and/or inner surface of the casing. A lethality-enhancement material, for example including preformed fragments or an energetic material, may be placed at the reduced-thickness portions (e.g., in the holes or the grooves) to further enhance effectiveness.
According to an aspect of the invention, a munition comprising; a penetrator casing; an explosive within the casing; a fuze for detonating the explosive; and a cable coupled to a fuze for providing a detonation signal to the fuze; wherein the penetrator casing has a nose, and an aft section extending back from the nose; wherein the nose has a thickest portion that is at least twice the thickness of the aft section; and wherein the cable interfaces with an interface in the aft section of the penetrator casing.
According to another aspect of the invention, a munition includes: a penetrator casing; an explosive within the casing; a fuze for detonating the explosive; a cable coupled to a fuze for providing a detonation signal to the fuze; and an external electrical harness that electrically couples to the cable. The external electrical harness runs outside of the penetrator casing, forward of the interface. The penetrator casing has a relatively thick nose, and a relatively thin aft section extending back from the nose. The cable interfaces with an interface in the aft section of the penetrator casing.
In some embodiments the cable is connected to a coupling at the opening in the aft section.
In some embodiments the munition includes an external electrical harness that electrically couples to the cable; the external electrical harness runs outside of the penetrator casing, forward of the interface.
In some embodiments the munition includes an enclosure around an outside of the penetrator casing.
In some embodiments the enclosure is a clamshell enclosure.
In some embodiments the munition includes a nose kit forward of the penetrator casing.
In some embodiments the electrical harness is coupled to the nose kit.
In some embodiments the nose kit is coupled to a forward connection of an enclosure around an outside of the penetrator casing.
In some embodiments the munition includes a tail kit aft of the penetrator casing.
In some embodiments the tail kit is coupled to an aft connection of an enclosure around an outside of the penetrator casing.
In some embodiments the casing has a series of non-intersecting elongate reduced-thickness portions, thinner than portions of the casing that are adjacent the reduced-thickness portions.
In some embodiments the penetrator casing has a nose, and an aft section extending back from the nose; the reduced-thickness portions are parts of the aft section; and the nose has a thickest portion that is at least twice the thickness of the portions of the casing that are adjacent the reduced-thickness portions.
In some embodiments the aft section is substantially cylindrical.
In some embodiments the elongate reduced-thickness portions are parallel to one another.
In some embodiments the elongate reduced-thickness portions extend in straight lines.
In some embodiments the elongate reduced-thickness portions extend substantially parallel to a longitudinal axis of the warhead.
In some embodiments the elongate reduced-thickness portions are portions in which the casing has holes therein.
In some embodiments the holes include a series of longitudinal holes therein, separated circumferentially around the penetrator casing.
In some embodiments the elongate reduced-thickness portions are portions in which the casing has grooves therein. The grooves may be on an inside surface of the casing. Alternatively or in addition the grooves may be on an outside surface of the casing.
In some embodiments the munition includes a fuzewell within the penetrator casing.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the invention comprises the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims. The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative embodiments of the invention. These embodiments are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed. Other objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
The annexed drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, show various aspects of the invention.
A munition, such as a warhead, includes a penetrator casing for penetrating hard targets, such as a fortification or reinforced building or other structure. The penetrator casing has a relatively thick nose, and a relatively thin aft section extending back from the nose. A cable interface is in the aft section, and an electrical harness extends from the cable interface, external of the casing, and forward to a nose kit. The penetrator casing may have reduced-thickness portions, to provide weakness points to the casing that facilitate the casing being transformed into fragments of a semi-controlled and desirable size when an explosive within the casing is detonated after the penetration occurs, thus enhancing the effectiveness of the munition.
In what follows, a general description of a munition with a penetrator warhead is given first, with the munition including a penetrator case having a cable interface for connection to a nose kit. Then further details of the cable interface and connection are provided.
Referring initially to
The warhead 12 has a penetrator casing 34 that encloses an explosive 36. The explosive 36 is detonated by a fuze 38 that is at an aft end of the explosive 36, in a fuzewell 40. The casing 34 has a forward nose 52, and an aft section 56 extending back from the nose 52. In the illustrated embodiment, the forward nose 52 of the penetrator case 34 is solid in nature, a monolithic structure with no cutout or through holes to accommodate forward mounted fuzing such as that used in general purpose bomb cases. The forward nose 52 is thickest at an apex 58 of the nose 52, and has a thickness that reduces the farther back you go along the casing 34, tapering gradually to the thickness of the substantially cylindrical aft section 56. The nose 52 may have a maximum thickness that is at least twice the thickness of the thickest part of the casing 34 in the cylindrical aft section 56.
With reference in addition to
In the illustrated embodiment the reduced-thickness portions 62 are a series of holes 68 that are parallel to a longitudinal axis 70 of the warhead 12. The holes 68 do not intersect with one another, and are distributed circumferentially about the aft section 56. The holes 68 may be substantially evenly distributed in the circumferential direction around the aft section 56, although a non-even distribution is a possible alternative. The use of the holes 68 to produce the reduced-thickness portions 62 is just one possible configuration. Alternatives, such as notches or grooves on the inner and/or outer surfaces of the aft section 56, may also be used.
The reduced-thickness portions 62 in the illustrated embodiment are non-intersecting, and are elongate, having lengths (in the axial or longitudinal direction) that are for example of at least ten times their widths (in the circumferential direction). The reduced-thickness portions 62 may be substantially identical in their lengths, widths, and reduction in thickness of material, although alternatively the reduced-thickness portions 62 may vary from one to another with regard to one or more of these parameters.
The aft section 56 may have a thickness of 1.9 to 5.1 cm (0.75 to 2 inches). The holes 68 may have a diameter of about 1.27 cm (0.5 inches), or more broadly from 0.31 to 1.9 cm (0.125 to 0.75 inches). These values are only examples, and a wide variety of other values are possible.
The holes 68 may be filled with a lethality-enhancement material 76, to further increase the effectiveness of the warhead 12. In the illustrated embodiment, the holes 68 are filled with preformed fragments 80. The fragments 80 may include fragments with different materials, different shapes, and/or different sizes, although as an alternative all of the fragments may be substantially identical in material, size, and shape. Other materials, such as spacers, may be placed between the hard preformed fragments.
The fragments 80 may each be 0.3 to 450 grams (5 to 7000 grain weights), for example. The fragments 80 may be spheres, cubes, cylinders, flechetts, parallelepipeds, uncontrolled solidification shapes (such as used in HEVI-SHOT shotgun pellets), to give a few non-limiting examples. The material for the fragments 80 may be one or more of steel, tungsten, aluminum, tantalum, lead, titanium, zirconium, copper, molybdenum, etc. There may be a wide range of the number of the fragments 80 in the munition 10, with as few as 10 fragments for a small warhead, to as many as 1,000,000 for very large munitions.
One advantage of the munition 10 is that it provides flexibility and adaptability for fragment sizes, weights, and shapes. These parameters are tailorable in accordance with mission requirements. Smaller fragments, for example the size of pebbles, are more suitable for localized full coverage, while larger fragment sizes allow more observable damages within the target site.
The fragments 80 are projected outward from the warhead 12 when the explosive 36 is detonated. Thus the warhead 12 has the characteristics of both a penetrator weapon and a fragmentation weapon. The penetrator casing 34 remains intact as the warhead 12 strikes a hard target, such as a concrete building, allowing the warhead to penetrate into the hard target, perhaps to an interior space that may be occupied by targeted personnel. Then the fuze 38 detonates the explosive 36. This causes the casing 34, because of the weakness introduced by the reduced-thickness portions 62, to break up into fragments that can do damage within the hard target. In addition the preformed fragments 80 may enhance the fragmentation effect of the warhead 12.
The lethality-enhancement material 76 may alternatively or in addition include energetic materials, such as chemically-reactive materials. For example, the fragments 80 may be spaced apart, with energetic material placed between adjacent of the fragments within the holes 68. The energetic material may be or may include any of a variety of suitable explosives and/or incendiaries, for example hydrocarbon fuels, solid propellants, incendiary propellants, pyroforic metals (such as zirconium, aluminum, or titanium), explosives, oxidizers, or combinations thereof. Detonation of the explosive 36 may be used to trigger reaction (such as detonation) in the energetic material that is located at the reduced-thickness portions 62. This adds further energy to the detonation, and may aid in propelling the fragments 80 and/or in breaking up the penetrator casing 34 into fragments.
The penetrator casing 34 may be made out of a suitable metal, such as a suitable steel (for example 4340 steel) or another hard material, such as titanium. Aluminum and composite materials are other possible alternatives. An example of a suitable material for the explosive 36 is PBXN-109, a polymer bonded explosive.
The holes 68 may be through holes, or may be blind holes that only go to a specific depth. The depth of blind holes may all be the same, or may vary according to achieve some desired effect, or due to system-level requirements such as varying hole length due to aircraft mounting lugs for example. The holes 68 may be made by machining, for example by drilling, or may be made by other suitable processes, such as acid etching. In the illustrated embodiment the holes 68 are only in the aft casing section 56, but as an alternative there may be holes or other reduced-thickness portions of parts of the nose 52.
With reference now to
The fuze 38 is used to detonate the explosive 36. As discussed earlier, the fuze 38 is located in the fuzewell 40 located at an aft end of the munition 12. The fuze 38 is operably coupled to the nose kit 24, for example to receive from the nose kit 24 a signal to detonate the fuze 38. The nose kit 24 may include a sensor or other device that it is used to provide a signal to trigger the firing of the fuze 38. The triggering event may be the munition 10 reaching a desired height for detonation (height of burst), for example.
The connection between the nose kit 24 and the fuze 38 includes an external electrical harness 92 and an internal electrical line or cord (or cable) 94 that runs through a conduit 96 (
Lethality may be enhanced by providing additional fragments between the airframe 14 and the casing 34. The additional fragments may be loose, may be fragmentation packs in pockets or openings in the airframe 14, or may be in the form of cast fragmentation. Other lethality enhancement materials, such as explosives, may also possibly be included between the casing 34 and the airframe 14.
The enhanced fragmentation provided by the munition 10 may allow more effective engagement of both soft and hard targets, as well flexibility in using a single munition in multiple modes, by use of the fuze 38 to control whether detonation occurs at a height above ground, or only after penetration of a hard target. The target selection (the mode of hard versus soft, the fuze delay, and/or the height of bust control setting) may be controlled in any of multiple ways: 1) preset by the ground crew before weapon launch for some systems; 2) controlled from the aircraft or other launcher before weapon launch by the pilot or ground control for some systems; and/or 3) controlled after weapon launch via a data link. The use of the reduced-thickness portions 62 (
The use of the external electrical 92, and its ability to connect the nose kit 24 to the fuze 38, through the electrical connection 102, enables many of the benefits of the munition 10. In particular, in order to have a hybrid munition that can be used for both target penetration and as an area fragmentation weapon, it is advantageous to not have the connection to the nose kit at the nose of the warhead, as this could compromise the ability to penetrate hard targets.
Although the invention has been shown and described with respect to a certain preferred embodiment or embodiments, it is obvious that equivalent alterations and modifications will occur to others skilled in the art upon the reading and understanding of this specification and the annexed drawings. In particular regard to the various functions performed by the above described elements (components, assemblies, devices, compositions, etc.), the terms (including a reference to a “means”) used to describe such elements are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any element which performs the specified function of the described element (i.e., that is functionally equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure which performs the function in the herein illustrated exemplary embodiment or embodiments of the invention. In addition, while a particular feature of the invention may have been described above with respect to only one or more of several illustrated embodiments, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other embodiments, as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 61/938,297, filed Feb. 11, 2014, and to U.S. Provisional Application 61/986,985, filed May 1, 2014. Both of these applications are incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/015427 | 2/11/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/175039 | 11/19/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1006875 | Puff | Oct 1911 | A |
1300333 | Berry | Apr 1919 | A |
2337765 | Nahirney | Dec 1942 | A |
2972950 | Welanetz | Feb 1961 | A |
3134330 | Batou | May 1964 | A |
3474731 | Thomanek | Oct 1969 | A |
3744419 | Hand | Jul 1973 | A |
3820464 | Dixon | Jun 1974 | A |
3981243 | Doris, Jr. | Sep 1976 | A |
4063512 | Davis | Dec 1977 | A |
4327643 | Lasheras Barrios | May 1982 | A |
4353305 | Moreau et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4524696 | Altenau et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4592283 | Hellner et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4648323 | Lawther | Mar 1987 | A |
4664035 | Osofsky | May 1987 | A |
4693317 | Edwards et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4882996 | Bock et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4896607 | Hall | Jan 1990 | A |
5078051 | Amundson | Jan 1992 | A |
H1048 | Wilson et al. | May 1992 | H |
5117759 | Henderson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5131329 | Lips et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5305505 | Ruhlman | May 1994 | A |
5313890 | Cuadros | May 1994 | A |
5535679 | Craddock | Jul 1996 | A |
5656792 | Rentzsch | Aug 1997 | A |
5698814 | Parsons et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717397 | Ruszkowski, Jr. | Feb 1998 | A |
5852256 | Hornig | Dec 1998 | A |
5939662 | Bootes et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6105505 | Jones | Aug 2000 | A |
6135028 | Kuhns et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6186072 | Hickerson, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6374744 | Schmacker et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389977 | Schmacker et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6484642 | Kuhns et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6523477 | Brooks et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6601517 | Guirguis | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6619210 | Spivak et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6659013 | Kellner | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7152532 | Conrad | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7231876 | Kellner | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7614348 | Truitt et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7971533 | Berlin et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8061275 | Gold | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8161884 | Kokodis et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8176849 | Gold et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8191479 | Ruhlman et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8234979 | Falabella et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8387539 | Maines | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8671840 | Scheid et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8701557 | Biggs et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9291437 | Bonnstetter et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9423226 | Cillaut et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9683822 | Kerns et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9816793 | Budy et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20030167956 | Kellner | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172833 | Ronn et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050087088 | Lacy | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050115450 | Lloyd | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050223930 | Bootes et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235862 | Gousman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20080019386 | Chen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100032515 | Geswender et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100199875 | Weihrauch | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110162548 | Berlin et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120017795 | Dryer et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120227609 | Volkmann | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120291651 | Haumann et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140299012 | Odintsov | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160025467 | Botthof et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160377396 | Bootes et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180156586 | Bootes et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
649627 | May 1985 | CH |
2557676 | Jun 1977 | DE |
1001244 | May 2000 | EP |
1316774 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1367358 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1864960 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2095059 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2910612 | Jun 2008 | FR |
2384291 | Nov 1993 | GB |
2008-261627 | Oct 2006 | JP |
9830863 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9830863 | Jul 1998 | WO |
0203008 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2008089078 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008096069 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009102254 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2011054361 | May 2011 | WO |
2011054361 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2015175036 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015175037 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015175038 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015175039 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015175040 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2016022181 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016022199 | Feb 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/015427 dated Nov. 24, 2015. |
Written Opinon for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/015427 dated Nov. 24, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180156585 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61986985 | May 2014 | US | |
61938297 | Feb 2014 | US |