The present invention generally relates to munitions, such as for use in penetrating hard targets or as area weapons relying on fragmentation.
Munitions come in any of a wide variety of configurations. Sometimes it is required or advantageous for multiple types of munitions to be configured to mate with standard components and/or standard delivery systems.
In addition, weapons for penetrating hard targets, such as buildings or fortifications having reinforced concrete walls, have generally used steel casings to survive challenging impact conditions against hardened target structures. Using solid steel cased cylindrical wall structures that protect the explosive payload during penetration have been the standard. However, this approach results in relatively low numbers of large naturally formed steel cased fragments upon warhead detonation inside the hardened target.
According to an aspect of the invention, a munition includes: a penetrator warhead and an enclosure around the outside of the penetrator casing, enclosing the penetrator warhead. The penetrator warhead includes: a penetrator casing; and an explosive within the penetrator casing.
In some embodiments the enclosure is a clamshell enclosure.
According to another aspect of the invention, a munition includes a warhead that includes: a casing; and an explosive within the casing. The warhead also includes an enclosure around the outside of the casing, enclosing the warhead. The enclosure includes solid fragments that are propelled outward when the explosive is detonated.
In some embodiments the solid fragments are in openings or pockets within the enclosure.
In some embodiments the solid fragments are enclosed as parts of self-contained fragmentation packs that are located in the openings or pockets.
In some embodiments the fragmentation packs are flexible.
In some embodiments the fragmentation packs include a fragmentation pack casing that contains the fragments.
In some embodiments the fragmentation pack casing is a sealed fragmentation pack casing.
In some embodiments the fragmentation pack casing is a metal and/or plastic fragmentation pack casing.
In some embodiments the fragments are in cast fragment blocks that include multiple of the fragments held together by a binder.
In some embodiments the cast fragment blocks are adhesively secured to the enclosure.
In some embodiments the cast fragment blocks are mechanically secured to the enclosure.
In some embodiments a metallic powder material is within the enclosure.
In some embodiments the metallic powder material includes aluminum, magnesium, zirconium or titanium.
In some embodiments the metallic powder material is an incendiary material.
In some embodiments the metallic powder material is within a flexible bag or casing.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a munition includes an airframe, and a warhead or munition within the airframe. The airframe has openings therein, and there are fragments in the openings.
In some embodiments the penetrator casing has a nose, and an aft section extending back from the nose; the reduced-thickness portions are parts of the aft section; and the nose has a thickest portion that is at least twice the thickness of the portions of the casing that are adjacent the reduced-thickness portions.
In some embodiments the aft section is substantially cylindrical.
In some embodiments the elongate reduced-thickness portions are parallel to one another.
In some embodiments the elongate reduced-thickness portions extend in straight lines.
In some embodiments the elongate reduced-thickness portions extend substantially parallel to a longitudinal axis of the warhead.
In some embodiments the elongate reduced-thickness portions are portions in which the casing has holes therein.
In some embodiments the holes include a series of longitudinal holes therein, separated circumferentially around the penetrator casing.
In some embodiments the elongate reduced-thickness portions are portions in which the casing has grooves therein. The grooves may be on an inside surface of the casing. Alternatively or in addition the grooves may be on an outside surface of the casing.
In some embodiments the warhead includes a lethality-enhancement material located at the reduced-thickness portions of the penetrator casing. The lethality-enhancement material may include solid fragments that are projected by the warhead when the explosive is detonated. The lethality-enhancement material may include an energetic material that releases energy when the explosive is detonated.
In some embodiments the solid fragments include spherical fragments.
In some embodiments the solid fragments include fragments in casings.
In some embodiments the solid fragments include fragments having flat bodies.
In some embodiments fragments having flat bodies are star-shape fragment having a series of protrusions extending from each of the flat bodies.
In some embodiments the protrusions are edged protrusions.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the invention comprises the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims. The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative embodiments of the invention. These embodiments are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed. Other objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
The annexed drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, show various aspects of the invention.
A munition may include a warhead, such as a penetrator warhead, enclosed in airframe. The airframe may enable connection to standard mountings, and/or to standard nose kits or tail kits. The airframe may have preformed fragments in it, packed between the airframe and the warhead. The preformed fragments may be loose, may be packed in a potting material, or may be in flexible bags. The fragments may enhance performance of the munition. The warhead may also contain preformed fragments.
In the following description, a general description of a munition with a penetrator warhead is given first, with the munition including an airframe that encloses the warhead. Details of the airframe and preformed fragments that may located in the airframe are then discussed. It should be understood that the airframe described below may be used in combination with other sorts of warheads (other than penetrator warheads).
Referring initially to
The warhead 12 has a penetrator casing 34 that encloses an explosive 36. There may also be an asphaltic liner between the penetrator casing 34 and the explosive 36. The asphaltic liner serves as a sealing material and protective layer for the explosive 36 during storage, transportation and target penetration. The explosive 36 is detonated by a fuze 38 that is at an aft end of the explosive 36, in a fuzewell 40. The casing 34 has a forward nose 52, and an aft section 56 extending back from the nose 52. In the illustrated embodiment, the forward nose 52 of the penetrator case 34 is solid in nature, a monolithic structure with no cutout or through holes to accommodate forward mounted fuzing such as that used in general purpose bomb cases. The forward nose 52 is thickest at an apex 58 of the nose 52, and has a thickness that reduces the farther back you go along the casing 34, tapering gradually to the thickness of the substantially cylindrical aft section 56. The nose 52 may have a maximum thickness that is at least twice the thickness of the thickest part of the casing 34 in the cylindrical aft section 56.
With reference in addition to
In the illustrated embodiment the reduced-thickness portions 62 are a series of holes 68 that are parallel to a longitudinal axis 70 of the warhead 12. The holes 68 do not intersect with one another, and are distributed circumferentially about the aft section 56. The holes 68 may be substantially evenly distributed in the circumferential direction around the aft section 56, although a non-even distribution is a possible alternative. The use of the holes 68 to produce the reduced-thickness portions 62 is just one possible configuration. Alternatives, such as notches or grooves on the inner and/or outer surfaces of the aft section 56, may also be used. These alternatives are discussed further below.
The reduced-thickness portions 62 in the illustrated embodiment are non-intersecting, and are elongate, having lengths (in the axial or longitudinal direction) that are for example of at least ten times their widths (in the circumferential direction). The reduced-thickness portions 62 may be substantially identical in their lengths, widths, and reduction in thickness of material, although alternatively the reduced-thickness portions 62 may vary from one to another with regard to one or more of these parameters.
The holes 68 may be filled with a lethality-enhancement material 76, to further increase the effectiveness of the warhead 12. In the illustrated embodiment, the holes 68 are filled with preformed fragments 80. The fragments 80 include two types of fragments, with steel preformed fragments 82 alternating with zirconium-tungsten preformed fragments 84, and with the fragments 82 having a different size and shape from the fragments 84. More broadly, the fragments 80 may include fragments with different materials, different shapes, and/or different sizes, although as an alternative all of the fragments may be substantially identical in material, size, and shape. Other materials, such as spacers, may be placed between the hard preformed fragments.
One advantage of the munition 10 is that it provides flexibility and adaptability for fragment sizes, weights, and shapes. These parameters are tailorable in accordance with mission requirements. Smaller fragments, for example the size of pebbles, are more suitable for localized full coverage, while larger fragment sizes allow more observable damages within the target site.
The fragments 80 are projected outward from the warhead 12 when the explosive 36 is detonated. Thus the warhead 12 has the characteristics of both a penetrator weapon and a fragmentation weapon. The penetrator casing 34 remains intact as the warhead 12 strikes a hard target, such as a concrete building, allowing the warhead to penetrate into the hard target, perhaps to an interior space that may be occupied by targeted personnel. Then the fuze 38 detonates the explosive 36. This causes the casing 34, because of the weakness introduced by the reduced-thickness portions 62, to break up into fragments that can do damage within the hard target. In addition the preformed fragments 80 may enhance the fragmentation effect of the warhead 12.
The lethality-enhancement material 76 may alternatively or in addition include energetic materials, such as chemically-reactive materials. For example, the fragments 80 may be spaced apart, with energetic material placed between adjacent of the fragments within the holes 68. The energetic material may be or may include any of a variety of suitable explosives and/or incendiaries, for example hydrocarbon fuels, solid propellants, incendiary propellants, pyroforic metals (such as zirconium, aluminum, or titanium), explosives, oxidizers, or combinations thereof. Detonation of the explosive 36 may be used to trigger reaction (such as detonation) in the energetic material that is located at the reduced-thickness portions 62. This adds further energy to the detonation, and may aid in propelling the fragments 80 and/or in breaking up the penetrator casing 34 into fragments.
Many alternatives are possible for the arrangement and type of materials. The energetic materials may be placed between every adjacent pair of the fragments 80, or next to every second fragment, or every third fragment, etc. In addition, the materials may include substances that could neutralize or destroy chemical or biological agents.
The lethality-enhancement material 76 may be omitted from the holes 68, if desired, with holes 68 just filled with air (for example) or gases, or liquids. Without the lethality-enhancement material 76, the enhanced fragmentation of the warhead 12 comes from the breakup of the penetrator casing 34 into smaller fragments due to the reduced thickness areas of the penetrator casing 34.
The penetrator casing 34 may be made out of a suitable metal, such as a suitable steel (for example 4340 steel) or another hard material, such as titanium. Aluminum and composite materials are other possible alternatives. An example of a suitable material for the explosive 36 is PBXN-109, a polymer bonded explosive.
The holes 68 may be through holes, or may be blind holes that only go to a specific depth. The depth of blind holes may all be the same, or may vary according to achieve some desired effect, or due to system-level requirements such as varying hole length due to aircraft mounting lugs for example. The holes 68 may be made by machining, for example by drilling, or may be made by other suitable processes, such as acid etching. In the illustrated embodiment the holes 68 are only in the aft casing section 56, but as an alternative there may be holes or other reduced-thickness portions of parts of the nose 52.
Lethality may be enhanced by providing fragmentation packs in pockets or openings, such as the bay portions 122-138, in the airframe or enclosure 14. The pockets or openings may be defined longitudinally (forward and aft) by circumferentially-extending ribs of the enclosure, for example with ribs 123 and 125 defining the forward and aft ends of the bay portion 124, and with ribs 133 and 135 defining the forward and aft ends of the bay portion 134. The fragmentation packs 190 may be enclosed packages containing fragments and possibly other lethality enhancement materials, such as explosives, and are shown in
The fragments enclosed in the packs may be similar in material and other aspects to the various fragments 80 (
As an alternative to (or in addition to) the fragmentation packs, fragments may be otherwise placed in the openings or pockets, in order to increase lethality. Fragments that are not prepackaged may be placed in the openings, for example with a potting material or covers to keep the fragments within the openings. The fragments placed in openings may be similar to the fragments within the fragmentation packs, as described above. In addition, other lethality-enhancement material, such as that described above, may also be packed into the openings.
The composition of the cast fragment blocks, such as the cast fragment block 142, may be varied to achieve different effects. Different types fragments or amounts of fragments may be used to achieve different weights. In addition, differences in sizes and/or types of fragments may produce different fragmentation effects.
In
In
The configuration and method shown in
The enhanced fragmentation provided by the munition 10 may allow more effective engagement of both soft and hard targets, as well flexibility in using a single munition in multiple modes, by use of the fuze 38 to control whether detonation occurs at a height above ground, or only after penetration of a hard target. The target selection (the mode of hard versus soft, the fuze delay, and/or the height of bust control setting) may be controlled in any of multiple ways: 1) preset by the ground crew before weapon launch for some systems; 2) controlled from the aircraft or other launcher before weapon launch by the pilot or ground control for some systems; and/or 3) controlled after weapon launch via a data link.
Although the invention has been shown and described with respect to a certain preferred embodiment or embodiments, it is obvious that equivalent alterations and modifications will occur to others skilled in the art upon the reading and understanding of this specification and the annexed drawings. In particular regard to the various functions performed by the above described elements (components, assemblies, devices, compositions, etc.), the terms (including a reference to a “means”) used to describe such elements are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any element which performs the specified function of the described element (i.e., that is functionally equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure which performs the function in the herein illustrated exemplary embodiment or embodiments of the invention. In addition, while a particular feature of the invention may have been described above with respect to only one or more of several illustrated embodiments, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other embodiments, as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 61/938,297, filed Feb. 11, 2014, and to U.S. Provisional Application 61/986,985, filed May 1, 2014. Both of these applications are incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/015420 | 2/11/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/175037 | 11/19/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1006875 | Puff | Oct 1911 | A |
1154437 | Rimailho | Sep 1915 | A |
1300333 | Berry | Apr 1919 | A |
2337765 | Nahirney | Dec 1943 | A |
2972950 | Welanetz | Feb 1961 | A |
3134330 | Batou | May 1964 | A |
3263612 | Throner, Jr. | Aug 1966 | A |
3474731 | Thomanek | Oct 1969 | A |
3489088 | Von Ballmoos | Jan 1970 | A |
3744419 | Hand | Jul 1973 | A |
3815504 | Tieben | Jun 1974 | A |
3820464 | Dixon | Jun 1974 | A |
3981243 | Doris, Jr. | Sep 1976 | A |
4063512 | Davis | Dec 1977 | A |
4106410 | Borcher | Aug 1978 | A |
4327643 | Lasheras Barrios | May 1982 | A |
4353305 | Moreau | Oct 1982 | A |
4430941 | Raech, Jr. | Feb 1984 | A |
4524696 | Altenau | Jun 1985 | A |
4592283 | Hellner et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4648323 | Lawther | Mar 1987 | A |
4664035 | Osofsky | May 1987 | A |
4693317 | Edwards et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4882996 | Bock | Nov 1989 | A |
4896607 | Hall et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5078051 | Amundson | Jan 1992 | A |
H1048 | Wilson | May 1992 | H |
5117759 | Henderson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5131329 | Lips et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5305505 | Ruhlman | May 1994 | A |
5313890 | Cuadros | May 1994 | A |
5535679 | Craddock | Jul 1996 | A |
5565648 | Lindstadt | Oct 1996 | A |
5656792 | Rentzsch et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5698814 | Parsons et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717397 | Ruszkowski, Jr. | Feb 1998 | A |
5852256 | Hornig | Dec 1998 | A |
5939662 | Bootes et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6105505 | Jones | Aug 2000 | A |
6135028 | Kuhns | Oct 2000 | A |
6186072 | Hickerson, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6279482 | Smith | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6374744 | Schmacker et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389977 | Schmacker | May 2002 | B1 |
6484642 | Kuhns et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6523477 | Brooks et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6598534 | Lloyd | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6601517 | Guirguis | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6619210 | Spivak et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6659013 | Kellner | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7066093 | Ronn | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7152532 | Conrad | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7231876 | Kellner | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7614348 | Truitt | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7726244 | Lloyd | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7971533 | Berlin et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8061275 | Gold | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8161884 | Kokodis et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8176849 | Gold et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8191479 | Ruhlman et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8234979 | Falabella et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8387539 | Maines | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8671840 | Scheid et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8701557 | Biggs et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9291437 | Bonnstetter et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9423226 | Cillaut et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9683822 | Kerns | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9816793 | Budy et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20030167956 | Kellner | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172833 | Ronn | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050087088 | Lacy | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050109234 | Lloyd | May 2005 | A1 |
20050115450 | Lloyd | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050223930 | Bootes | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235862 | Gousman | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20080019386 | Chen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100032515 | Geswender et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100199875 | Weihrauch | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110162548 | Berlin et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120017795 | Dryer et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120227609 | Volkmann | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120291651 | Haumann et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140299012 | Odintsov | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160025467 | Botthof et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160377396 | Bootes et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
649627 | May 1985 | CH |
2557676 | Jun 1977 | DE |
1001244 | May 2000 | EP |
1316774 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1367358 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1864960 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2095059 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2910612 | Jun 2008 | FR |
2384291 | Nov 1993 | GB |
2008-261627 | Oct 2006 | JP |
9830863 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9830863 | Jul 1998 | WO |
0203008 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2008089078 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008096069 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009102254 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2011054361 | May 2011 | WO |
2011054361 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2015175036 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015175037 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015175038 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015175039 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015175040 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2016022181 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016022199 | Feb 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action issued in corresponding Korean Application No. 10-2016-7024769 dated Jan. 30, 2018, and the English translation. |
International Search Report for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/015420 dated Feb. 3, 2016. |
Written Opinion for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/015420 dated Feb. 3, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180156586 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61986985 | May 2014 | US | |
61938297 | Feb 2014 | US |