The present invention relates to the design of iron type golf club heads, and more particularly, to muscle-back iron type club heads.
Cavity-back iron type club heads, also known as perimeter weighted irons, are known to have a concentration of mass about the periphery of a rear surface of the club head. This concentration of mass is in a raised, rib-like, perimeter weighting element that substantially surrounds a rear cavity, which comprises a major portion of the rear surface of the club head. In addition to locating a substantial amount of mass away from the center of the club head behind the club face, the rib-like perimeter weighting element acts as a structural stiffener, which compensates for reduction in face thickness in the cavity region.
Cavity-back clubs are quite forgiving when a ball is struck away from the optimal impact point, or sweet spot, of the club face, in part due to increased moment of inertia provided by the perimeter weighting element. On such off-center hits, distance lost due to head rotation, resulting from the ball striking force being applied distal from the sweet spot, is minimized. Further, harsh vibrations transmitted through the shaft to the hands of the golfer are also minimized.
Therefore, cavity-back clubs permit a golfer to strike the ball anywhere within a significant area on the clubface without realizing significant negative physical effects or performance losses. For this reason cavity-back clubs are well suited to inexperienced or less skilled golfers, who struggle to consistently and accurately strike a golf ball at the sweet spot of the club head. Skilled golfers, who consistently strike a golf ball at the sweet spot of their club heads have found that cavity-back clubs generally provide less feel because they are designed for maximum forgiveness. To these golfers, cavity-back clubs may not provide the feedback or ball control required for shaping their shots (commonly referred to as “working” the ball) to accommodate a variety of playing conditions.
Muscle-back or blade irons are characterized by a thick lower portion known as the “muscle”, which extends along the entire length of the head. A thin upper portion extends upwardly from the muscle and behind the face of the club, and is commonly referred to as the blade portion. The blade portion has no reinforcement ribs or perimeter weighting, the only concentration of mass being in the muscle of the club, behind its sweet spot. Typically, a muscle-back club head is smaller than a cavity-back head, due to the solid muscle portion having substantial mass. This configuration provides excellent feel when a ball is struck at the sweet spot, but typically yields a harsher sensation as well as greater distance loss associated with off-center shots in comparison to similar shots hit with cavity-back irons. For these reasons, muscle-back clubs are generally better suited to skilled golfers who consistently strike the ball within close proximity of the sweet spot. Muscle-back clubs therefore are more difficult to hit, but provide skilled golfers with desired control and shot shaping ability, or workability.
The benefits of cavity-back irons are best realized in the lower numbered irons, or long irons, which are known to be the most challenging to hit effectively for many golfers of all skill levels. By comparison, higher numbered short irons, even those of the muscle-back type, are generally perceived as being substantially easier to hit effectively. For this reason, golfers of all skill levels generally forfeit the forgiveness benefits of cavity-back clubs when they select the shorter irons in a set, for example wedges with typical lofts from about 44 to about 66 degrees, in exchange for the workability and feel of muscle-back clubs.
Although it is generally easier effectively to strike a short, muscle-back iron than a long, muscle-back iron, a need nonetheless exists for improvements in the feel and forgiveness of muscle-back irons.
The present invention comprises a muscle-back iron golf club head having improved feel and forgiveness characteristics. In one embodiment of the invention, the club head includes a planar front surface, a top surface, a sole surface, a heel surface, a toe surface, and a rear surface having a first contour. The club head has a blade-like upper mass and a muscle-like lower mass defined by the rear surface, planar front surface, top surface, sole surface, heel surface, and toe surface. A recess is provided in the rear surface, the recess having a first portion and a second portion, where the first portion is formed in the blade-like upper mass and the second portion is formed in the muscle-like lower mass.
An insert may be provided in the recess. The insert may substantially fill the recess and may include a back surface having a second contour which does not follow the first contour of the club head rear surface.
The invention is further explained in conjunction with the following figures illustrating the present invention.
a) is a perspective sectional view of another insert for use with a club head in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, depicting a first two piece insert configuration;
b) is a rear view of the insert of
c) is a perspective view of a first piece of the insert of
d) is a perspective view of a second piece of the insert of
a) is a perspective sectional view of an insert for use with a club head in accordance with yet another embodiment of the present invention, depicting a second two piece insert configuration;
b) is a rear view of the insert of
c) is a perspective view with a perspective sectional view of a first piece of the insert of
a) is a perspective view of an insert for use with a club head in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention;
b) is a sectional view of the insert of
c) is a section view of a first piece of the insert of
d) is a section view of a second piece of the insert of
e) is a sectional view of the insert of
f) is a sectional view of a first piece of the insert of
g) is a sectional view of a second piece of the insert of
h) is a sectional view of the insert of
i) is an exploded sectional view of the insert of
j) is a sectional view of the insert of
k) is an exploded sectional view of the insert of
a) is an exploded perspective view of a two-piece insert configuration;
b) is a side view of a portion of the insert of
c) is an exploded perspective view of yet another two-piece insert configuration;
For purposes of illustration the figures herein are not necessarily drawn to scale. In all of the figures, like components are designated by like reference numerals.
Throughout the following description, specific details are stated to provide a more thorough understanding of the invention. However, the invention may be practiced without these particulars. In other instances, well known elements have not been expressly shown or described. Accordingly the detailed description and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Referring to
The muscle portion may be generally separated from the blade portion transition line 121, represented by a phantom line. If there is no distinct boundary separating the muscle and blade portions, such as in the case of the embodiment shown in the figures, the transition between the muscle and blade portions may occur via a gradual surface curvature, for example at the perigee defined by blade portion 120 and muscle portion 130.
Referring to
Referring now to
The geometric shapes defined by perimeter wall 142 and the perimeter of rear surface 115 are dissimilar. Otherwise, the recess can define any generally planar shape, e.g. square, ellipsoidal, circular, or any other desired geometric shape. Preferably, the shape of recess 140 is nearly symmetrical along any number of axes, preferably at least one. In one embodiment of the invention, recess 140 has a geometric shape that is nearly symmetrical about two axes, a first axis 171 and a second axis 172 (see
Recess 140 preferably penetrates into the blade portion 120 a distance less than about half the thickness of blade portion 120. As such, the majority of the material removed in forming the recess is taken from muscle portion 130. The total mass of the material removed is redistributed to the toe and heel areas of the muscle portion to increase forgiveness on off-center shots. Redistributing the mass may be accomplished in a number of ways, for example by increasing the volume of the heel and toe regions of the muscle, resulting in sole width dimensions greater than those found in traditional muscle-back irons and wedges. Referring to
As shown in
To illustrate the impact of the above described mass distribution method on club head geometry, a comparison of sole widths wh, wt, and wc for a known line of wedges and an exemplary set of wedges in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention is presented in the tables below. These known wedges have traditionally shaped muscle-back heads, and are known to have muscle portion volumes that are already approximately 30 percent greater than normal. Therefore, the widths measured from their soles are representative of the maximums in known traditional wedges.
In an alternate embodiment of the invention shown in
In providing the aforementioned configurations, club head 100 has increased forgiveness on off-center hits, as well as superior feel at impact on such off-center hits. In addition, the advantages of traditional muscle-back irons and wedges previously discussed have not been lost. Club head 100 may be made from any material previously used for iron-type golf club heads. However, preferred materials include the ductile or gray irons disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/787,899, filed on Feb. 27, 2004, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Referring now to an alternate embodiment of the invention shown in
In addition to serving as lightweight filler for recess 140, insert 150 provides vibration attenuation when the club head strikes a golf ball, resulting in favorable feel characteristics. These favorable characteristics are most evident when resilient materials are used for insert 150. Resilient materials further provide the user with a tactile sensation of softness when handling the club head, which inspires confidence and generally causes the user to associate the tactile softness with soft feel when striking a ball with the club.
Insert 150 may also be made of, for example, a low density resilient polymer having a specific gravity ranging from about 0.95 to about 1.7, and Shore hardness of about 25 A to about 95 A. Examples of such materials can be found among the many different types of Silicones, Thermo Plastic Elastomers (TPE)/Thermo Plastic Rubbers (TPR), Thermo Plastic Ester Elastomers (TPEE), Thermo Plastic Olefins (TPO), Thermo Plastic Vulcanates (TPV), Melt Processible Rubbers (MPR), Thermo Plastic Sterenics (TPS), Flexible PVCs (F-PVC), Ethelyne Vinyl Acetates (EVA), Ionomer Resins (IR), and Thermo Plastic Polyurethanes (TPU).
An exemplary material of the silicone type is GE Silicones' Tufel® II 94605 series silicone. An exemplary TPV material is RTP Company's 2800B series, which is available in a variety of Shore hardnesses within the exemplary range given above.
In one embodiment, the specific location and shape of the recess 140, as well as a prominent contour of rear surface 153 of insert 150 causes the resilient material to protrude from the rear surface of the head in such a way that the user's palm and/or fingers are most likely to come into contact with the insert when handling the club head. Therefore, the volume of the insert 150 may be generally larger than the volume of recess 140, whereby the contour of rear surface 153 of the insert does not follow the contour of rear surface 115 of the club head so that the insert protrudes from the rear surface of the head. The volume of recess 140 corresponds to the volume of head material that would need to be removed from club head 100 to form recess 140 if the contour of rear surface 115 were extended over recess 140.
In a further embodiment of the invention, insert 150 may include a captive member 155 with insignia thereon contained within or formed in a resilient member 154. The outer portion of resilient member or body 154 bounds captive member 155, resilient body 154 (see
In still another combination, the various club head geometries of the present invention, as described in this application, may be used in combination with a vibration absorptive structure, instead of a resilient member as described herein. Such vibration absorptive structures are described in Hutin et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,316,298, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in the present application. Such vibration absorptive plaques or structures are typically adhered to a bottom surface of the rear cavity or recess in an iron type golf club head.
It is desirable to provide a plurality of bounce or bounce angle configurations for each loft in which the iron-type club heads according to various embodiments of the present invention are made. For example, high bounce may be achieved by club heads having a bounce angle in the range of about ten to about eighteen degrees, while low bounce may be achieved by a bounce angle in the range of about zero to about ten degrees. Each individual configuration varies the volume of head material in the sole region to create the desired bounce angle. To maintain proper swing weighting without significantly modifying the overall head shape for each bounce configuration, mass may be added or subtracted from bottom surface 141 or perimeter wall(s) 142 of the recess. Referring to
Thus, a positive or negative step 143 is formed in recess 140 by adding or subtracting material from bottom surface 141 (as shown in
To reduce the number of required components, a single insert can be used for a variety of club head configurations by providing an indentation on either perimeter wall 152 or forward surface 153 to accommodate any additional material which may be added to any of the corresponding recess surfaces with which insert 150 mates.
The insert may be secured within recess 140 using any known techniques to secure inserts within a golf club head, including, but not limited to, adhesives, forming or curing or vulcanizing the insert within the recess, plastic deformation of the club head material surrounding the insert, press fitting, providing retention elements on the club head within recess 140 or on insert 150, or both.
The above-described embodiments of the club head are given only as examples. Therefore, the scope of the invention should be determined not solely by the disclosed illustrations, but by their equivalents and the appended claims.
The present application claims priority to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/590,907, filed Jul. 26, 2004, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1139985 | Legh | May 1915 | A |
2846228 | Reach | Aug 1958 | A |
3079157 | Turner | Feb 1963 | A |
3810631 | Braly | May 1974 | A |
D246328 | Tanner | Nov 1977 | S |
D247383 | Adkins | Feb 1978 | S |
4621808 | Orchard et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4798383 | Nagasaki et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4811950 | Kobayashi | Mar 1989 | A |
4848747 | Fujimura et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4852880 | Kobayashi | Aug 1989 | A |
4883274 | Hsien | Nov 1989 | A |
4884812 | Nagasaki et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4928972 | Nakanishi et al. | May 1990 | A |
4955610 | Creighton et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5082278 | Hsien | Jan 1992 | A |
5104457 | Viljoen et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
D336758 | Jossey | Jun 1993 | S |
5242167 | Antonious | Sep 1993 | A |
5290036 | Fenton et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5316298 | Hutin et al. | May 1994 | A |
5333872 | Manning et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5423546 | Manning et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425535 | Gee | Jun 1995 | A |
5429353 | Hoeflich | Jul 1995 | A |
D361813 | Guibaud et al. | Aug 1995 | S |
D363962 | Smith | Nov 1995 | S |
D368754 | Blough et al. | Apr 1996 | S |
5522593 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5540436 | Boone | Jul 1996 | A |
5586947 | Hutin | Dec 1996 | A |
5588923 | Schmidt et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5595548 | Beck | Jan 1997 | A |
5637045 | Igarashi | Jun 1997 | A |
5643106 | Baird | Jul 1997 | A |
5643111 | Igarashi | Jul 1997 | A |
5649872 | Antonious | Jul 1997 | A |
5658208 | Shimasaki | Aug 1997 | A |
5674133 | Chang et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5692972 | Langslet | Dec 1997 | A |
5697855 | Aizawa | Dec 1997 | A |
5707302 | Leon et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
D392707 | Frazetta | Mar 1998 | S |
D393676 | Frazetta | Apr 1998 | S |
D393677 | Frazetta | Apr 1998 | S |
5749794 | Kobayashi et al. | May 1998 | A |
5810682 | Carruthers | Sep 1998 | A |
5823887 | Mikame et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5899821 | Hsu et al. | May 1999 | A |
5924939 | Grace et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5997414 | Dalton | Dec 1999 | A |
6030293 | Takeda | Feb 2000 | A |
6030295 | Takeda | Feb 2000 | A |
6042486 | Gallagher | Mar 2000 | A |
6045456 | Best et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6080069 | Long | Jun 2000 | A |
D434462 | Reed et al. | Nov 2000 | S |
6159109 | Langslet | Dec 2000 | A |
6186903 | Beebe et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200228 | Takeda | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200229 | Grace et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206790 | Kubica et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210290 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6273831 | Dewanjee | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290607 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290608 | Gates | Sep 2001 | B2 |
6379263 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
D458328 | Solheim et al. | Jun 2002 | S |
6409612 | Evans et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6482104 | Gilbert | Nov 2002 | B1 |
D466960 | Imamoto | Dec 2002 | S |
D470554 | Truesdale | Feb 2003 | S |
D473605 | Petersen et al. | Apr 2003 | S |
6554722 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6592468 | Vincent et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592469 | Gilbert | Jul 2003 | B2 |
D479568 | Rodgers et al. | Sep 2003 | S |
6683152 | Wu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6688989 | Best | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695714 | Bliss et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6709345 | Iwata | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719641 | Dabbs et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6835144 | Best | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6902495 | Pergande et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921344 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
20010007834 | Gates | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010029208 | Takeda | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020004429 | Wu et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020098910 | Gilbert | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020128088 | Yializis et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030022729 | Pergande et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030119602 | Kennedy, III et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139225 | Rife | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030203764 | Dabbs et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030236134 | Nishitani | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040058745 | Clausen | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040214657 | Hou | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050239572 | Roach et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080058120 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60590907 | Jul 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11188665 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 11976819 | US |