The invention relates to a muzzle-loading rifle (also known as muzzleloader), i.e. a rifle in which the gunpowder and bullet are loaded and pressed into the barrel manually. More particularly, the invention has to do with the breech plug and the barrel of said rifle.
A muzzle-loading rifle is a rifle that, in structural and functional terms, replicates old-fashioned, traditional rifles and gives the user the feeling that they are firing an antique weapon in accordance with classical hunting techniques. Specifically, a muzzle-loading rifle is mainly characterised in that the gunpowder and the bullet must be manually inserted into the bottom of the barrel and pressed down before the shot can be fired.
After the gunpowder and the bullet have been pressed into the bottom of the barrel (next to the breech plug), the trigger is pulled, the shot happening as follows: the pulling of the trigger causes an ignition at the end of the breech plug opposite the gunpowder and the bullet. Said ignition travels through a relatively narrow internal conduit of the breech plug until it reaches the other side of the breech plug, reaching the gunpowder. The gunpowder then explodes, causing the bullet to be fired.
After a certain number of shots is performed using these rifles, traces of gunpowder usually collect in the connection area between the breech plug and the barrel (a connection area that is generally threaded although it may present other arrangements). These traces of gunpowder make it very difficult to detach the breech plug from the barrel, so much that in some cases it is impossible to detach the breech plug with the traditional tools the user carries with them. In more extreme cases it is impossible to remove the breech plug without damaging it, even when securing the rifle on work benches and using large levering tools. Bearing in mind that the breech plug must be detached from the barrel every day (so that it may be cleaned carefully in order to remove the traces of gunpowder and other impurities that may block the internal conduit), the difficulty or impossibility of separating both members can cause great inconvenience for the user.
Some solutions are known that attempt to solve this problem. One known solution consists of disposing of one or more elastic mechanized rings (shaped like a very closed C-shape, in other words almost in the form of a complete circle) between the breech plug and the barrel, on the end of the breech plug that is closer to the gunpowder and the bullet, with these rings acting as seals. These solutions may work for low-pressure explosions, but it has been found that they are ineffective with regard to the pressures generated in muzzle-loading rifles: muzzle-loading rifles are set up to use new-generation black gunpowder, which is much more powerful than the gunpowder used traditionally. Firstly, as the rings are not completely circular or closed, it has been found that gunpowder can pass through them and reach the connection area between the breech plug and the barrel. Secondly and above all, it has been found that in spite of the ring there is a small area between the breech plug and the barrel where particles of gunpowder are prone to collect. This space is large enough to cause a “sticking” effect that is just as problematic as the gunpowder reaching the connection area.
It is an objective of the invention to provide a design for a muzzle-loading rifle, more particularly for the rifle's breech plug and barrel, which prevents any gunpowder from passing from the gunpowder explosion area to the connection area between the breech plug and the barrel. Thus, the invention aims to facilitate the disconnection of the breech plug from the barrel as much as possible and enable said disconnection to be carried out manually without the help of any tools whatsoever.
In order to achieve the aforementioned objectives the invention proposes a muzzle-loading rifle provided with a breech plug and a barrel, both of them fixed to each other in a connection area, wherein the breech plug comprises a first end further away from the part of the barrel where a bullet is to be housed and a second end closer to said part of the barrel. According to the invention, the second end of the breech plug is provided with a flange that presses internally against a seating surface of the barrel when the breech plug is fitted in the interior of the barrel. Said pressure increases when the gunpowder located near the second end of the breech plug explodes. In other words, the flange expands against the seating surface when the gunpowder explodes, increasing the pressure it exerts on the seating surface and therefore improving the sealing effect.
The flange of the breech plug is continuous, i.e. it does not have any breaks or gaps. Contact between the flange and the seating surface occurs in the area of 360° around the longitudinal axis of the breech plug. This is possible because the flange bends against the seating surface and may thus form a complete ring shape. The continuity enhances the barrier effect against the gunpowder and helps ensure the objectives of the invention are reached.
The invention provides a permanent seal between the breech plug and the barrel thanks to the pressure that the flange always exerts against the seating surface as a result of the breech plug being attached securely (for example, threaded tightly enough) to the barrel. And, above all, it is particularly interesting that because the pressure is exerted from the inside said sealing effect strengthens when the shot is fired, i.e., when the ignition and the powder explosion take place. Therefore, the invention allows achieving a non-constant, adaptive sealing between the breech plug and the barrel, said sealing being greatest when most needed: during the explosion and expansion of the gunpowder.
As a result, no gunpowder whatsoever is able to pass through to the connection area between the breech plug and the barrel (this has been tested in trials producing results that were in fact surprising). The effect is so positive that the breech plug may be manually and softly detached after several shots, with no effort at all.
Details of the invention can be seen in the accompanying non-limiting figures:
In the rifle shown in the figure the shot occurs as follows. Firstly, an ignition occurs in the chamber (8) in the first end (4) of the breech plug (1). Said ignition travels along an internal conduit (9) of the breech plug (1) until it reaches the second end (5) of the breech plug (1). When the ignition reaches the gunpowder (7) an explosion occurs, causing the bullet (6) to be fired in the shot direction (D). The explosion of the gunpowder (7) also results in some traces of gunpowder being projected through gaps between the outer walls of the breech plug (1) and the inner walls of the barrel (2) towards the connection area (3), potentially blocking it. To prevent this some manufacturers provide the rifle with an elastic mechanized ring (10) that acts as a seal between the area where the gunpowder (7) is located and the connection area (3). It has been found that this elastic mechanized ring (10)—and other similar solutions using seals—largely prevent the passage of gunpowder to the connection area (3). However, in this and other similar solutions it has been found that the gunpowder collects in a small area (15) between the breech plug (1) and the barrel (2), which is sufficiently large to cause a “sticking” effect that is just as problematic as the gunpowder reaching the connection area (3).
The flange (11) presses internally on the seating surface (12), as shown in
Preferably, the seating surface (12) on which the flange (11) presses forms an angle other than 90° with the longitudinal axis (13). This embodiment has been proven to multiply (supposing a constant torque setting) the normal force during the explosion between the seating surface (12) and the flange (11) by three. This performance (the sealing effect that does not allow gunpowder to pass) will be optimum the smaller the contact area between the flange (11) and the seating surface (12), because the smaller the contact area, the greater the pressure between the surfaces (supposing a constant normal force).
To ensure that the invention works correctly, it has been found that the flange (11) should have a reduced thickness, the aim being to guarantee a minimum flexibility (if it were completely rigid, it would not be tensioned and a seal would not be created, or alternatively the breech plug (1) would have to be screwed on very tightly to make it sufficiently tensioned, something that the user would find almost impossible). In consequence, the breech plug (1) preferably also comprises a protective projection (14) disposed externally to the flange (11) to protect the flange (11) from being damaged and possibly broken when the user is handling the breech plug while detaching the barrel. Said protective projection (14) is preferably an outer wall concentric to the flange (11), as shown in
The present invention provides for other embodiments different to those shown. For example, the connection between the breech plug (1) and the barrel (2) can be other than the threaded connection shown in the figures.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4222191 | Lee et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4232468 | Chapin | Nov 1980 | A |
5133143 | Knight | Jul 1992 | A |
5639981 | French | Jun 1997 | A |
5706598 | Johnston | Jan 1998 | A |
5782030 | French | Jul 1998 | A |
5860240 | Ball et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5907920 | Laney | Jun 1999 | A |
5915934 | Knight et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6216380 | McGarity, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6311421 | Knight | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6604311 | Laney et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6718677 | Camp | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7140138 | Laney et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7260911 | Davis | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7353631 | Calvete Zumalde | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7526888 | Joyce | May 2009 | B1 |
7621064 | Laney et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7726058 | Richards | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7814694 | Laney et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7954269 | Laney et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20020035800 | Lewis | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20050066566 | Hengstenberg et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060086029 | Kirkpatrick | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070039222 | Lizarralde et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0178284 | Apr 1986 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120137558 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |