1. Field of the Invention
This disclosure relates generally to firearms and, more particularly, to muzzle-loading firearms having inline ignition systems and a removable breech plug.
2. Related Art
Early in 1968, U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson signed into law the Omnibus Crime Control Bill, which included sundry curbs on handguns, including a ban on the interstate mail-order sale thereof. However, the President did not think that ban went far enough, and so he proposed new gun legislation targeting shotguns and rifles. After prolonged and heated debate, Congress finally enacted the strongest gun control legislation in the nation's history on October 22 of that year. As finally approved, the legislation: outlawed the mail-order sales of all rifles, shotguns, and ammunition, except between licensed dealers, manufacturers, and gun collectors; banned the sale of rifles, shotguns, and handguns to persons under 21 years of age; and banned direct sales of guns to out-of-state residents unless the state involved specifically authorized its citizens to buy guns in adjoining states. Muzzleloading, black-powder firearms, though, were exempted from most of the restrictive legislation.
During the past three decades, muzzleloading firearms have enjoyed a strong resurgence in popularity. Certainly, the federal exemptions from the ban on interstate mail order sales have helped. In addition, because black-powder firearms have significantly less range and are generally less accurate than smokeless, breech-loading firearms, most states have established special seasons for muzzleloader hunting that are more favorable than those allotted to breechloader hunters. However, the most significant factor in the growing popularity of muzzleloader firearms is almost certainly the challenge associated with the use of a single shot rifle during the hunt. Muzzle-loader hunters style themselves as an elite group. A single shot with a weapon of less range, at a quarry likely made wary by other hunters who came before you, has almost irresistible appeal for many. The allure of muzzleloading hunting is the same as that afforded by flyfishing: the greater the challenge, the greater the satisfaction. Today, there are two basic types of muzzleloaders used for hunting: primitive and in-line. Both types require the introduction of a measured powder charge into the gunbarrel, and the ramming of a slug or ball down on top of the charge to load the gun.
Primitive muzzleloaders generally use either a flintlock or a caplock ignition system. The flintlock, popular from the time of the Revolutionary War through the early 1800s, is the more primitive technology. The hammer of the gun holds a piece of flint wrapped in fine leather. Below the hammer is a swinging metal plate known as the frizzen. Below the frizzen is the pan, into which the shooter pours a small amount of fine black powder. Pulling the trigger releases the hammer, which strikes the frizzen, which then folds back, thereby showering the powder in the pan with sparks. The powder ignites, shooting a tongue of flame into the barrel of the gun via a small port. The powder charge in the barrel ignites, expelling the ball or slug that has been rammed down the barrel. The foregoing process is as cumbersome as it sounds. Ignition is neither instantaneous, nor certain. A full second or more may elapse between pulling the trigger and ignition of the measured charge. Flintlock shooters must remain steady for that period.
The caplock ignition system, though the more modern of the primitive technologies, still relies on a side hammer design and the funneling of a flame into a port in the barrel. However, ignition is accomplished through a small nipple seated under the hammer. A copper percussion cap filled with a small amount of priming compound is placed atop the nipple. When the hammer falls, the cap shoots a tiny spurt of hot flame through the nipple and into the port in the barrel, thereby igniting the powder inside and expelling the slug or ball from the barrel. Ignition of the loaded charge is much more direct and rapid than with the flintlock.
The special muzzleloader hunting seasons were originally established for the intended use of primitive percussion or flintlock rifles or shotguns, using black powder and open metal sights. These types of guns have specific limitations. Loading such a gun is considerably more cumbersome and time-consuming than loading cartridges into a breechloader. Thus, the hunter may get only one shot at his game, so he'd better make it count. This necessitates getting close to the quarry, learning to shoot well with open sights, and keeping the powder dry in inclement weather.
An in-line ignition muzzleloader, on the other hand, utilizes a plunger-type hammer, which strikes a nipple centered at the rear of the breech plug. An in-line ignition is quick and reliable because the fire from the cap travels a straight, short distance into the powder charge rather than bouncing around a corner as it does in a side hammer design. In all other respects, an in-line rifle loads and shoots identically to a traditional side hammer percussion muzzleloader. In-line rifles are nothing new. Some flintlocks used in-line ignition as far back as the 1700s, although the lack of sufficiently powerful springs to drive the in-line hammers probably kept them from supplanting side-hammer rifles. In the early 1970s and 1980s a couple of rifles, most notably the Michigan Arms Wolverine, featured an in-line ignition. The Wolverine, however, had a long, heavy octagonal barrel and never caught on with shooters.
Tony Knight, a gunsmith from rural Lancaster, Mo., is generally credited with building the first modern, lightweight, in-line blackpowder rifle. Knight was no traditionalist, and figured that any hunting rifle should be equipped with a tapered 22-inch barrel. Starting with a Numrich Arms barrel, Knight added a removable, friction-securable, threaded breech plug that simplified cleaning and allowed hunters to push an unfired charge out the breech instead of having to fire the rifle or pulling the ball back out of the barrel to unload it. He also incorporated Remington sights, a handmade trigger, and a stock carved from a piece of walnut cut from a tree on his farm. Knight's first in-line design, which he christened MK-85, is considered a milestone in muzzleloader technology.
Knight's new rifle set the standard for in-line models subsequently manufactured by hundreds of competitors, both large and small. The in-line rifle business is booming. One can now purchase a gun that looks and operates very much like a modern sporting rifle. In essence, it is a modern single-shot rifle that is loaded with a ramrod. Many in-line shooters use pelletized powder, such as those produced by Pyrodex®, that can be dropped into the barrel in 50-grain increments, and saboted bullets that are constructed much like a high-powered rifle bullet, but with a plastic sleeve which allows them to be more easily rammed down the barrel. With a shotgun primer, a #11 primer cap, a musket cap, or a primer adapted from a center-fire cartridge securable in the breech to ignite the propellent charge, rain and high humidity are much less problematic, especially if the firearm is fabricated from stainless steel. Many of these modern rifles, which may be fitted with scopes and other optical sights, are capable of groupings of one inch or less at a range of 100 yards.
The use of an in-line rifle, no matter how sophisticated the features, still means single-shot, front-loading, no-mistakes hunting. An in-line hunter accepts the same challenge of placing one well-aimed shot at relatively close range. Granted, a properly loaded, scoped in-line enjoys a big advantage in effective range over an open-sighted rifle shooting round-balls. In a sense, the in-line rifle is to blackpowder what the compound bow is to archery: easier to shoot and harder-hitting than traditional gear, yet subject to the same underlying limitations.
The present disclosure provides several new types of quickly removable breech plugs, as well as a mechanism for both inserting a fresh primer into a recess in the breech plug and extracting a spent primer therefrom. Breech plugs are used to stopper the barrel at the breech end thereof. All muzzleloading firearms do not have removable breech plugs. Early muzzleloading cannon barrels, for example, had the breech plug cast unitary with the barrel. On primitive muzzleloader rifles and pistols, the bore of the barrel does not extend to the breech. Because the combustion of black powder forms highly corrosive deposits in the barrel, frequent cleaning of muzzleloader firearms is essential.
For a muzzleloader having no breech plug, cleaning the barrel and extracting an unfired charge can be quite a chore. A removable breech plug greatly simplifies those tasks, as cleaning of the barrel is most easily effected by removing the plug and running a cleaning rod through the barrel from the muzzle into the breech. One of the problems associated with conventional threaded breech plugs is that removal of the plug requires the use of a wrench or other special tool. Threaded breech plugs typically have either a polygonal socket or shank which can be engaged with a wrench. For socket-type plugs, an appropriately-sized square or hexagonal Allen wrench is used; for shank type plugs, an appropriately-sized socket, box-end or open-end wrench is used. On an in-line rifle, the firing plunger assembly can be disassembled so that the plug may be accessed directly using an extension inserted through the end of the receiver. Although removal of the firing plunger requires the expenditure of additional time and effort, it facilitates removal of the breech plug. A break-open type receiver or falling block action muzzleloader can involve different steps to remove the breech plug, but also present difficulties with respect to removal of the breech plug. Thus, no matter which method is used, removal of a conventional threaded breech plug is, at the very least, a nuisance.
It has been recognized that it would be advantageous to develop a new type of breech plug that may be quickly removed without tools.
Another problem related to black power firearms is the difficulty of removing spent primers (often referred to as primer caps) from the primer recess in the rear end of the breech plug. Most modern black powder rifles now use the readily available #209 shotgun primer. Difficult to manually remove from the recess before they are fired, they must invariably be pried from the recess with a tool after they are fired due to expansion of the brass primer casing. If extreme care is not used during the extraction process, the rifle will sustain some degree of mechanical damage.
It has also been recognized that it would be advantageous to have a mechanism for rapidly extracting a spent primer from the primer recess in the breech plug, which will eliminate any potential for damaging the firearm.
In various embodiments, the present invention provides a breech plug on a muzzleloader firearm that can be removed without tools in about one second. The ease and speed of removal not only facilitates cleaning of the barrel, but enables the shooter to easily expel misfired charges through the breech, rather than attempting to extract it through the muzzle. The present application also provides a mechanism for quickly and safely extracting primers from the primer recess in the breech plug. The primer extractor may be used with breech plugs of both the conventional threaded type and the new quickly-removable type.
The invention requires either a redesign the breech end of the barrel and the breech plug or a redesign of the threaded breech plug to accept an easily-removable breech plug. In one embodiment of the invention, the rifle's receiver is also modified to include a locking aperture on a forward edge of the breech access cutout. The barrel is provided with at least one lug retaining structure that includes an internal annular groove and an internal annular shoulder that is both adjacent the annular groove and positioned between the annular groove and the breech end of the barrel. Each annular shoulder is provided with lug entry cutouts, which are radially spaced about the shoulder. The breech plug is provided with multiple lugs forming at least one crenelated external shoulder. The lugs are spaced and sized so that they align with the lug entry cutouts in the barrel. The number of external shoulders on the breech plug can match the number of internal annular grooves in the barrel. The breech plug is installed in the barrel by aligning the lugs with the lug entry cutouts, and then rotating the plug so that the lugs are no longer aligned with the lug entry cutouts.
In addition to the rotational locking mechanism disclosed in the parent application, several new rotational locking mechanisms are disclosed, any of which may be successfully employed to rotationally lock the breech plug in its closed position. For a first locking mechanism, a ball bearing installed in a first cylindrical recess protrudes from the head of the breech plug and locks into a semi-cylindrical detent recess in the rear end of the barrel when urged into that position by a sliding spring-biased detent rod having a flattened cutout, the detent rod being maintained in a second cylindrical recess, perpendicular to and intersecting with the first, by a set screw that traps the flattened cutout. When the detent rod is depressed, the ball bearing retracts into the first cylindrical recess, thereby permitting the breech plug to be rotated to its open position. For a second locking mechanism, a pin having a 45-degree-angle driven tab intersects a spring-loaded sliding detent pin having a 45-degree-angle drive groove. The spring loading causes the sliding detent pin to urges the pin against the rifle barrel. When the sliding detent pin is depressed, the detent pin retracts the pin from the semi-cylindrical recess in the barrel, thereby permitting the breech plug to be rotated to its open position.
Various embodiments of the invention are shown and described. A first main embodiment utilizes a barrel having pair of lug retaining structures, which are axially positioned within the breech-end of the barrel, one behind the other. For this embodiment, the breech plug has two circular arrays of lugs, with the lugs of one circular array being aligned with those of the other circular array. Each lug retaining structure in the barrel has at least two lug entry cutouts, and each circular array of lugs on the breech plug has a number of lugs which correspond to the number of lug entry cutouts in a single lug retaining structure in the barrel. Lug retaining structures with up to four lug entry cutouts are shown and described. More are certainly possible, but increase the complexity and difficulty of the machining process, with little or no return for the added expenditure of effort. In fact, because radiused cuts are produced by most machine tools, the total amount of surface area available for lugs and lug retaining structures may actually decrease as the number of lugs increases. Although it is conceivable that a single lug entry cutout may be used for a single lug retaining structure, a breech plug having a single lug would be unable to radially distribute the load to the barrel, thereby resulting in a tipping force concentrated at a point on the outer edge of the breech plug. In addition, greater axial rotation of the plug in an arc of up to 180 degrees would be required to achieve an optimum load handling capability. Therefore, although a breech plug having a single lug or multiple longitudinally-aligned lugs has been contemplated, and is covered by the claims of this patent, it is not considered to be a preferred embodiment of the invention, as there are other alternatives that require far less axial rotation and provide balanced radial distribution of the load from a fired charge.
A second main embodiment breech plug and barrel combination is also shown and described, in which the barrel has only a single lug retaining structure and the breech plug has only a single circular array of lugs. As with the first main embodiment of the invention, the circular array may have two or more lugs. A breech plug having four equiangularly-spaced lugs per circular array requires axial rotation of about 45 degrees to provide maximum load distribution within the barrel; with three lugs per circular array, the angle of rotation is about 60 degrees; and with two lugs per circular array, the angle of rotation is about 90 degrees.
Both main embodiments of the breech plug may be used in combination with the various types of ignition systems that are currently used and may be used in the future to ignite the powder charge in the barrel. All embodiments of the lugged breech plug, which is one component of the present invention, may be modified to accept the various types of available primer caps including, but not limited to, #11 caps, musket caps, shotgun primer caps, rifle primer caps and pistol primer caps. Although the design of center-rear portion of the lugged breech plug must be specifically modified to accept the various types of primers, the lugged structure which permits quick removal of the plug is entirely unaffected by such modifications.
Although a detent pin is used to lock the breech plug of the present invention within the rifle barrel, it should be understood that this is only one of many possible mechanisms. For example, a clamping mechanism could be substituted, as could a friction screw lock. The detent pin method is advantageous because it is simple, reliable, and visually verifiable. Movement of the detent pin release lever as the detent pin locks in place provides a verifiable indication of the locked-in-place condition.
In some embodiments of the breech plug the lugs are unitary with a shank portion that has a diameter only slightly less than the barrel bore diameter. This clearance is, ideally, just sufficient to provide a non-interference sliding fit. A circumferential shoulder portion is positioned between and unitary with both the shank portion and a head portion. The circumferential shoulder portion, which fits into a recess at the breech end of the barrel, complicates the exit route of any combustion gases which may escape through the clearances between the breech plug and the barrel by diverting them around two 90-degree corners. The breech end of the barrel is also equipped with an annular lip that fits into a circumferential groove in the head portion of the breech plug, thereby routing any escaping gases around three additional 90-degree corners. Using these techniques, the leakage of combustion gases between the rife bore and the periphery of the breech plug is minimized. Other types of gas seals may also be used. One or more O-ring seals, a compressible metal sealing ring, or a crushable metal sealing ring may also be used in place of, or in combination with escape route diversion seals.
For a lever action rifle, which incorporates action lugs in the receiver which retain and lock the slide before it is fired, a breech plug (at least theoretically) need not be designed to withstand any of the explosive force which propels the bullet. Thus, a single circular array of lugs on the breech plug is more than adequate. In addition, as the action lugs are designed to withstand the explosive force in the barrel, even a single lug breech plug would suffice, as the slide would prevent any tipping of such an asymmetrical breech plug.
For another embodiment of the invention, a conventional threaded breech plug is replaced by a modified primary threaded breech plug, which is intended to remain either permanently or semi-permanently installed within the breech end of the barrel. The modified breech plug is provided with a lug retaining structure, similar to those provided for the breech end of the barrel as heretofore described. A secondary lugged breech plug is then provided which is insertable in the primary breech plug. It may then be rotated 90 degrees or less to lock it in place within the modified primary threaded breech plug.
Other alternative embodiments of a quickly removable breech plug are also disclosed. For one such embodiment, the breech end of the barrel is smaller than the muzzle end. A breech plug is rammed down the muzzle end of the barrel and secured from the breech end thereof with, for example, a snap ring locking pin, or other equivalent retaining device.
A second alternative embodiment of a quickly removable breech plug is insertable from the breech end of the barrel and is held in place by a snap ring accessible through an recess in the breech plug.
A third alternative embodiment of a quickly removable breech plug, which is also insertable from the breech end of the barrel, uses a double-helix Acme thread for rapid insertion. Because of the rotational loads imposed on the plug, the plug's rotational locking device must be able to handle the torque imposed on the plug by firing explosions in the barrel. A stout locking pin braced against an upper edge of the receiver, for example, would be able to withstand the torque.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the detailed description which follows, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which together illustrate, by way of example, features of the invention, and wherein:
Reference will now be made to exemplary embodiments illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will be used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Alterations and further modifications of the inventive features illustrated herein, and additional applications of the principles of the inventions as illustrated herein, which would occur to one skilled in the relevant art and having possession of this disclosure, are to be considered within the scope of the invention.
It should be understood that the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale and are intended to be merely illustrative. The invention should not be considered limited to any particular caliber or even to shoulder-fired weapons. The invention is as applicable to muzzleloader handguns as it is to muzzleloader rifles.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
It is to be understood that the above-referenced arrangements are illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications can be made without departing from the principles and concepts of the invention as set forth in the claims.
The present application claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/817,574, filed on Jun. 28, 2006, and entitled MUZZLELOADER HAVING A BREECH PLUG REMOVABLE WITHOUT TOOLS AND A PRIMER INSERTER/EXTRACTOR.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
26256 | Cochran | Nov 1859 | A |
33530 | Liesen | Oct 1861 | A |
470284 | Canet | Mar 1892 | A |
1300356 | Dawson et al. | Apr 1919 | A |
1388607 | Schneider | Aug 1921 | A |
1695728 | Dawson et al. | Dec 1928 | A |
2115743 | Niblett | May 1938 | A |
2537063 | Kroeger et al. | Jan 1951 | A |
2960916 | Rex | Nov 1960 | A |
4222191 | Lee et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4328633 | Pachmayr et al. | May 1982 | A |
4353282 | Holt | Oct 1982 | A |
4411088 | Wilson | Oct 1983 | A |
4437249 | Brown et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4854065 | French et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
D305030 | Fukushima | Dec 1989 | S |
D305031 | Fukushima | Dec 1989 | S |
4936035 | Reese et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4989357 | Norman et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5307583 | Mahn et al. | May 1994 | A |
5440963 | Szecsei | Aug 1995 | A |
5615507 | French | Apr 1997 | A |
5632109 | Caudle | May 1997 | A |
5639981 | French | Jun 1997 | A |
5680722 | French et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5737863 | Rainey, III | Apr 1998 | A |
5782030 | French | Jul 1998 | A |
5836099 | Pace et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
D405147 | Cash et al. | Feb 1999 | S |
5950864 | Cash et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6055760 | Cuson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6085454 | Caudle | Jul 2000 | A |
6364135 | Sirois et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6405654 | Smith | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6540092 | Sirios | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6604311 | Laney et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
7140138 | Laney et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7621064 | Laney et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20050115129 | Lizarralde et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060248771 | Richards | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070137084 | Laney et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110000118 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60817574 | Jun 2006 | US |